scholarly journals Assessment of the Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form Using Item Response Theory

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 147470492110441
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Nebl ◽  
Mark G. McCoy ◽  
Garett C. Foster ◽  
Michael J. Zickar

The mate retention inventory (MRI) has been a valuable tool in the field of evolutionary psychology for the past 30 years. The goal of the current research is to subject the MRI to rigorous psychometric analysis using item response theory to answer three broad questions. Do the individual items of the MRI fit the scale well? Does the overall function of the MRI match what is predicted? Finally, do men and women respond similarly to the MRI? Using a graded response model, it was found that all but two of the items fit acceptable model patterns. Test information function analysis found that the scale acceptably captures individual differences for participants with a high degree of mate retention but the scale is lacking in capturing information from participants with a low degree of mate retention. Finally, discriminate item function analysis reveals that the MRI is better at assessing male than female participants, indicating that the scale may not be the best indicator of female behavior in a relationship. Overall, we conclude that the MRI is a good scale, especially for assessing male behavior, but it could be improved for assessing female behavior and individuals lower on overall mate retention behavior. It is suggested that this paper be used as a framework for how the newest psychometrics techniques can be applied in order to create more robust and valid measures in the field of evolutionary psychology.

Politics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M Van Hauwaert ◽  
Christian H Schimpf ◽  
Flavio Azevedo

Recent research in the populism literature has devoted considerable efforts to the conceptualisation and examination of populism on the individual level, that is, populist attitudes. Despite rapid progress in the field, questions of adequate measurement and empirical evaluation of measures of populist attitudes remain scarce. Seeking to remedy these shortcomings, we apply a cross-national measurement model, using item response theory, to six established and two new populist indicators. Drawing on a cross-national survey (nine European countries, n = 18,368), we engage in a four-folded analysis. First, we examine the commonly used 6-item populism scale. Second, we expand the measurement with two novel items. Third, we use the improved 8-item populism scale to further refine equally comprehensive but more concise and parsimonious populist measurements. Finally, we externally validate these sub-scales and find that some of the proposed sub-scales outperform the initial 6- and 8-item scales. We conclude that existing measures of populism capture moderate populist attitudes, but face difficulties measuring more extreme levels, while the individual information of some of the populist items remains limited. Altogether, this provides several interesting routes for future research, both within and between countries.


Assessment ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 107319111986465
Author(s):  
Maria Anna Donati ◽  
Elisa Borace ◽  
Edoardo Franchi ◽  
Caterina Primi

The Multidimensional State Boredom Scale (MSBS) is widely used, but evidence regarding its psychometric properties among adolescents is lacking. In particular, the functioning of the scale across genders is unknown. As a result, we used item response theory (IRT) to investigate gender invariance of the Short Form of the MSBS (MSBS-SF) among adolescents. Four hundred and sixty-six Italian high school students (51% male; M = 16.7, SD = 1.44) were recruited. A confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated the unidimensionality of the scale, and IRT analyses indicated that the scale was sufficiently informative. Differential item functioning (DIF) across genders showed that only one item had DIF that was both nonuniform and small in size. Additionally, relationships with negative/positive urgency and present/future-oriented time perspectives were found. Overall, this study offers evidence that the MSBS-SF is a valuable and useful scale for measuring state boredom among male and female adolescents.


Mindfulness ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1299-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floria H. N. Chio ◽  
Mark H. C. Lai ◽  
Winnie W. S. Mak

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 670-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Calamia ◽  
Kristian Markon ◽  
Natalie L. Denburg ◽  
Daniel Tranel

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1099-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne E. Mueller ◽  
Daniel L. Segal ◽  
Brandon Gavett ◽  
Meghan A. Marty ◽  
Brian Yochim ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackground:The Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS; Segal et al. (Segal, D. L., June, A., Payne, M., Coolidge, F. L. and Yochim, B. (2010). Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 709–714. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.002) is a self-report measure of anxiety that was designed to address unique issues associated with anxiety assessment in older adults. This study is the first to use item response theory (IRT) to examine the psychometric properties of a measure of anxiety in older adults.Method:A large sample of older adults (n = 581; mean age = 72.32 years, SD = 7.64 years, range = 60 to 96 years; 64% women; 88% European American) completed the GAS. IRT properties were examined. The presence of differential item functioning (DIF) or measurement bias by age and sex was assessed, and a ten-item short form of the GAS (called the GAS-10) was created.Results:All GAS items had discrimination parameters of 1.07 or greater. Items from the somatic subscale tended to have lower discrimination parameters than items on the cognitive or affective subscales. Two items were flagged for DIF, but the impact of the DIF was negligible. Women scored significantly higher than men on the GAS and its subscales. Participants in the young-old group (60 to 79 years old) scored significantly higher on the cognitive subscale than participants in the old-old group (80 years old and older).Conclusions:Results from the IRT analyses indicated that the GAS and GAS-10 have strong psychometric properties among older adults. We conclude by discussing implications and future research directions.


PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e12100
Author(s):  
Marco Tullio Liuzza ◽  
Rocco Spagnuolo ◽  
Gabriella Antonucci ◽  
Rosa Daniela Grembiale ◽  
Cristina Cosco ◽  
...  

Background There has recently been growing interest in the roles of inflammation in contributing to the development of anxiety in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). Patient-reported outcome measures can facilitate the assessment of physical and psychological functioning. The National Institutes of Health (NIH)’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) is a set of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) that cover physical appearance, mental health, and social health. The PROMIS has been built through an Item Response Theory approach (IRT), a model-based measurement in which trait level estimates depend on both persons’ responses and on the properties of the items that were administered. The aim of this study is to test the psychometric properties of an Italian custom four-item Short Form of the PROMIS Anxiety item bank in a cohort of outpatients with IMIDs. Methods We selected four items from the Italian standard Short Form Anxiety 8a and administered them to consecutive outpatients affected by Inflammatory Bowel disease (n = 246), rheumatological (n = 100) and dermatological (n = 43) diseases, and healthy volunteers (n = 280). Data was analyzed through an Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis in order to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian adaptation of the PROMIS anxiety short form. Results Taken together, Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Exploratory Factor analysis suggest that the unidimensionality assumption of the instrument holds. The instrument has excellent reliability from a Classical Theory of Test (CTT) standpoint (Cronbach’s α = 0.93, McDonald’s ω = 0.92). The 2PL Graded Response Model (GRM) model provided showed a better goodness of fit as compared to the 1PL GRM model, and local independence assumption appears to be met overall. We did not find signs of differential item functioning (DIF) for age and gender, but evidence for uniform (but not non-uniform) DIF was found in three out of four items for the patient vs. control group. Analysis of the test reliability curve suggested that the instrument is most reliable for higher levels of the latent trait of anxiety. The groups of patients exhibited higher levels of anxiety as compared to the control group (ps < 0.001, Bonferroni-corrected). The groups of patients were not different between themselves (p = 1, Bonferroni-corrected). T-scores based on estimated latent trait and raw scores were highly correlated (Pearson’s r = 0.98) and led to similar results. Discussion The Italian custom four-item short form from the PROMIS anxiety form 8a shows acceptable psychometric properties both from a CTT and an IRT standpoint. The Test Reliability Curve shows that this instrument is mostly informative for people with higher levels of anxiety, making it particularly suitable for clinical populations such as IMID patients.


Author(s):  
Abdul Wahab Ibrahim

The study used statistical procedures based on Item Response Theory to detect Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in polytomous tests. These were with a view to improving the quality of test items construction. The sample consisted of an intact class of 513 Part 3 undergraduate students who registered for the course EDU 304: Tests and Measurement at Sule Lamido University during 2017/2018 Second Semester. A self-developed polytomous research instrument was used to collect data. Data collected were analysed using Generalized Mantel Haenszel, Simultaneous Item Bias Test, and Logistic Discriminant Function Analysis. The results showed that there was no significant relationship between the proportions of test items that function differentially in the polytomous test when the different statistical methods are used.  Further, the three parametric and non-parametric methods complement each other in their ability to detect DIF in the polytomous test format as all of them have capacity to detect DIF but perform differently. The study concluded that there was a high degree of correspondence between the three procedures in their ability to detect DIF in polytomous tests. It was recommended that test experts and developers should consider using procedure based on Item Response Theory in DIF detection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Medianta Tarigan ◽  
Fadillah Fadillah

Intelligence as one of the individual abilities that is widely used in everyday life has been extensively studied and measured using psychological measurement tools. One of them is the Intelligenz Structure Test (IST). However, at this time IST has leakage through discussions made by many parties. Moreover, the process of IST adaptation to the Indonesian version which tends to translate each word allegedly results in a bias of meaning that can affect the validity of this measurement tools. Therefore, this study is aimed to evaluating the current quality of IST by testing the feasibility of the Indonesian version of IST items for verbal ability, namely SE (Satzergaenzung), WA (Wortauswahl), and AN (Analogien). Item Response Theory (IRT) is used as a research method. The data were collected from 2.064 participants who live in Bandung. The results of the analysis revealed that the SE, WA, and AN subtest are still valid. Based on 60 items analyzed, 71.67% of the items have good quality, i.e. 43 of the 60 items have estimation of discriminant (a) parameter is acceptable. In addition, based on the fit item statistics it was also known that 78.33% of significant items followed the IRT model. Furthermore, based on statistics of item fit, it is also known that 78.33% of items fit the IRT model. This shows that the Indonesian version of IST is still valid to be used particularly in measuring verbal comprehension (V) through 3 subtests (SE, WA, and AN). However, it is necessary to revise the items that have been infected with DIF, in which 25% of items were declared to have a gender bias. Inteligensi sebagai salah satu kemampuan individu yang banyak berperan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari telah banyak diteliti dan diukur menggunakan alat ukur psikologi. Salah satunya adalah Intelligenz Struktur Test (IST). Namun, saat ini IST telah mengalami kebocoran melalui pembahasan yang dibuat oleh banyak pihak. Selain itu, proses adaptasi IST ke bahasa Indonesia yang cenderung menerjemahkan setiap kata secara langsung diduga mengakibatkan terjadinya bias makna yang dapat mempengaruhi keabsahan alat ukur ini. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengevaluasi kualitas terkini IST dengan menguji kelayakan butir soal IST Bahasa Indonesia untuk kemampuan verbal, yaitu SE (Satzergaenzung), WA (Wortauswahl), dan AN (Analogien). Item Response Theory (IRT) digunakan sebagai metode penelitian ini. Data penelitian ini diperoleh dari 2.064 partisipan yang berdomisili di kota Bandung. Adapun penelitian ini menunjukkan hasil bahwa subtes SE, WA, dan AN masih tergolong valid. Berdasarkan 60 item yang dianalisis, 71,67% item memiliki kualitas yang cukup baik, yaitu 43 dari 60 item memiliki estimasi daya beda yang dapat diterima. Selain itu, berdasarkan statistik item fit juga diketahui 78,33% item signifikan mengikuti model IRT. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa IST Bahasa Indonesia masih valid untuk digunakan terutama dalam mengukur verbal comprehension (V) melalui 3 subtes (SE, WA, dan AN). Namun, perlu dilakukan revisi terhadap item soal yang terjangkit DIF, di mana 25% butir soal dinyatakan mempunyai bias jenis kelamin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document