scholarly journals The Influence of Tramadol on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time and Sexual Satisfaction Score in Treating Patients With Premature Ejaculation: A Network Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 155798832110577
Author(s):  
Youyi Lu ◽  
Zhongbao Zhou ◽  
Xiaoyi Zhang ◽  
Yuanshan Cui ◽  
Yong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Sexual Satisfaction ◽  
Premature Ejaculation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Satisfaction Score ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Latency Time ◽  
Ejaculatory Latency ◽  
Safety Assessments

This network meta-analysis aimed at assessing the influence of tramadol on the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and sexual satisfaction score (SSS) in treating patients with premature ejaculation (PE). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases (until July 2021), and original references of the included articles was systematically retrieved. The PRISMA checklist was followed. Finally, 14 articles including 1971 patients were included in this analysis. The results indicated that patients who were treated with tramadol (50 mg, 62 mg, 89 mg, and 100 mg) were superior to those treated with placebo in terms of IELT ( p = .003, p < .00001, p < .00001, and p < .00001, respectively), but 25 mg tramadol did not show a significant advantage ( p = .06). Patients who were treated with tramadol (50 mg and 100 mg) had a better efficacy than who were treated with 25 mg tramadol in the IELT ( p < .00001 and p < .00001), but the effect of 50 mg tramadol and 100 mg tramadol were not significantly different ( p = .17). The tramadol group had the better effect than the placebo group in the SSS ( p < .0001). And 50 mg tramadol showed a significant improvement compared with 20 mg paroxetine, as assessed by the IELT ( p = .03) and SSS ( p = .03). Safety assessments including adverse events suggested that tramadol was well tolerated. Tramadol showed a better improvement of IELT and SSS than placebo or paroxetine, and 50 mg tramadol may be a more reasonable therapeutic dose for patients with PE.

Efficacy and Safety of PEGPH20 in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Solipuram ◽  
Harish Gopalakrishna ◽  
Gayatri Naira ◽  
Akhila Mohan
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive tumor that had an estimated 57,600 new cases and 47,050 deaths in 2020 in the US alone. Recent studies have targeted tumor microenvironment (TME) for better delivery of systemic chemotherapy like PEGPH20, which degrades hyaluronic acid in the extracellular matrix (ECM). A meta-analysis of these Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to test the efficacy of PEGPH20 was performed. Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library without language limitations from inception to July 30, 2020. A total of 59 articles was identified, and 3 RCTs were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), deaths from adverse events, thromboembolic events, serious adverse events (SAE), and febrile neutropenia. Results: There was no statistically significant improvement in PFS (HR= 0.94; 95%CI (0.79, 1.11)) in the PEGPH20 group when compared to the standard treatment/placebo group. There was no significant difference among OS (HR= 0.99, 95%CI (0.83, 1.17), deaths from adverse events (RR=0.97; 95%CI (0.54, 1.73)), thromboembolic events (RR= 1.49; 95%CI (0.92, 2.44)), and febrile neutropenia (RR= 0.88; 95%CI (0.45, 1.72), however, there was statistically significant increase in SAE (RR = 1.59; 95%CI (1.01, 2.52) in the PEGPH20 group compared to the placebo group. Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that PEGPH20 did not improve the PFS or OS. Moreover, there is an increased incidence of serious adverse events with the use of PEGPH20 compared to standard therapies.

scholarly journals Observational study on the effects of a topical formulation in patients with premature ejaculation

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Quarto ◽  
Luigi Castaldo ◽  
Giovanni Grimaldi ◽  
Alessandro Izzo ◽  
Raffaele Muscariello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Dysfunction ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Sexual Satisfaction ◽  
Premature Ejaculation ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Diagnostic Approach ◽  
Latency Time ◽  
Topical Formulation ◽  
Ejaculatory Latency

Premature ejaculation (PE) has been defined as the inability to control or delay ejaculation, resulting in dissatisfaction or distress of the patient. Although PE is the most frequent sexual dysfunction, it is still underdiagnosed. An accurate clinical history is the best diagnostic approach that, in the majority of cases, is enough to differentiate between primary and acquired PE. Nowadays, treatment is not curative but is effective in increasing the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), improving the sexual satisfaction of the couple [...].

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of finerenone in diabetic kidney disease

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaning Zheng ◽  
Sheng Ma ◽  
Qiaomu Huang ◽  
Yu Fang ◽  
Hongjin Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Diabetic Kidney Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Diabetic Kidney

Background: The Phase III clinical trial of the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone (BAY 94-8862) has been completed, aiming to investigate renal and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in type 2 diabetes (T2D) with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the efficacy and safety of finerenone in renal function remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of finerenone in treating the patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Methods: Databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on patients with DKD receiving finerenone treatment from inception to September 2021. Data including patient characteristics and interested outcomes were extracted, and the dichotomous data and continuous variables were evaluated using risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs, respectively. Results: A total of 4 RCTs involving 13945 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Analysis results demonstrated that patients receiving finerenone showed a significant decrease in changing urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline (MD: ﹣0.30; 95%CI [﹣0.33, ﹣0.27] P=0.46, I2=0%) (P＜0.05). The number of patients with ≥40% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline in the finerenone group was significantly smaller than that in the placebo group (RR: 0.85; 95%CI [0.78, 0.93] P=0.60, I2=0%) (P＜0.05). No difference was found in adverse events between the finerenone and placebo groups (RR: 1.00; 95%CI [0.98, 1.01] P = 0.94, I2=0%) (P=0.65). The incidence of hyperkalemia was higher in the finerenone group than that in the placebo group (RR: 2.03; 95%CI [1.83, 2.26] P = 0.95, I2=0%) (P＜0.05). Conclusion: Finerenone contributes to the reduction of UACR and can ameliorate the deterioration of renal function in patients with T2D and CKD. The higher risk of hyperkalemia was found in the finerenone group compared with placebo, however, there was no difference in the risk of overall adverse events.

scholarly journals Premature Ejaculation – From Physiology to Treatment

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mário Pereira-Lourenço ◽  
Duarte Vieira e Brito ◽  
Bruno Jorge Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Dysfunction ◽  
Sexual Satisfaction ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Diagnostic Method ◽  
Premature Ejaculation ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Latency Time ◽  
Ejaculatory Latency

Objective: To review in literature about the concept of premature ejaculation from physiology to treatment. Materials and methods: A literature search conducted with Pubmed and Cochrane. Results: An accurate clinical history is the best diagnostic method, and in the majority of the cases it is enough to differentiate between primary and acquired premature ejaculation. Nowadays the treatment is not curative but is effective in increasing the Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time, improving the couple’s sexual satisfaction. Conclusion: Although PE is the most frequent sexual dysfunction, it is still sub-diagnosed. Combining behavioural techniques with pharmacotherapy is the best way of treatment.

scholarly journals The association between immune-related adverse events and the prognosis of solid cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592098054
Author(s):  
Huilin Xu ◽  
Ximing Xu ◽  
Wei Ge ◽  
Jinju Lei ◽  
Dedong Cao
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Good Survival ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Early Effect ◽  
Overall Response

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and reported to be associated with good survival. This study evaluated the association between onset timing of irAEs and survival of cancer patients treated with ICIs. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched to retrieve clinical studies assessing the relationship between irAEs and survival in cancer patients with ICIs. The overall response rate for treatment response and hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using RevMan 5.3. Subgroup analysis in terms of cancer type, ICIs type, region, specific irAEs, accordingly. Results: A total of 34 studies were included. The HRs for OS and PFS in cancer patients with versus without irAEs were 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.74; p < 0.0001], and 0.50 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.67; p < 0.00001), respectively. The odds ratio for overall response in cancer patients with irAEs was 4.72 (95% CI: 3.48, 6.40; p < 0.00001) compared with those without irAEs. Subgroup analyses suggested that the prognostic role of irAEs was associated with cancer types and region, but not irAEs types. The landmark analysis of OS revealed that there is a non-proportional (early) effect of irAEs on OS in ICI-treated cancer patients (landmark >12 weeks, HROS = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.30; p = 0.46). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the occurrence of irAEs could be a prognostic factor for cancer patients who were treated with ICIs.

Inhaled Levodopa (CVT-301) for the Treatment of Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001143
Author(s):  
Glenardi Glenardi ◽  
Tutwuri Handayani ◽  
Jimmy Barus ◽  
Ghea Mangkuliguna
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Motor Fluctuation ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Improve Motor Function

ABSTRACTPurposeof Review: To investigate the efficacy and safety of CVT-301 for motor fluctuation in Parkinson’s disease (PD).Recent Findings:This study demonstrated that the CVT-301 group had a higher proportion of patients achieving an ON state than the placebo group (OR=2.68; 95% CI: 1.86-3.86; p<0.00001). Moreover, CVT-301 had also shown to improve motor function by UPDRS-III score (SMD=3.83; 95% CI: 2.44-5.23; p<0.00001) and promote an overall improvement of PD by PGIC self-rating (OR=2.95; 95% CI: 1.78-4.9; p<0.00001). The most common adverse events encountered were respiratory symptoms (OR=12.18; 95% CI: 5.01-29.62; p<0.00001) and nausea (OR=3.95; 95% CI: 1.01-15.41; p=0.05).Summary:CVT-301 had the potential to be an alternative or even a preferred treatment for motor fluctuation in PD patients.

scholarly journals Nervous and Muscular Adverse Events after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 939
Author(s):  
Jiaxin Chen ◽  
Yuangui Cai ◽  
Yicong Chen ◽  
Anthony P. Williams ◽  
Yifang Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label

Background: Nervous and muscular adverse events (NMAEs) have garnered considerable attention after the vaccination against coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, the incidences of NMAEs remain unclear. We aimed to calculate the pooled event rate of NMAEs after COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on the incidences of NMAEs after COVID-19 vaccination was conducted. The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched from inception to 2 June 2021. Two independent reviewers selected the study and extracted the data. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and generated with random or fixed effects models. The protocol of the present study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021240450). Results: In 15 phase 1/2 trials, NMAEs occurred in 29.2% vs. 21.6% (p < 0.001) vaccinated participants and controls. Headache and myalgia accounted for 98.2% and 97.7%, and their incidences were 16.4% vs. 13.9% (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.28–3.06, p = 0.002) and 16.0% vs. 7.9% (OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.05–5.35, p < 0.001) in the vaccine and control groups, respectively. Headache and myalgia were more frequent in the newly licensed vaccines (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.28–3.06, p = 0.02 and OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.05–5.35, p < 0.001) and younger adults (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.12–1.75, p = 0.003 and OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.20–1.96, p < 0.001). In four open-label trials, the incidences of headache, myalgia, and unsolicited NMAEs were 38.7%, 27.4%, and 1.5%. Following vaccination in phase 3 trials, headache and myalgia were still common with a rate of 29.5% and 19.2%, although the unsolicited NMAEs with incidence rates of ≤ 0.7% were not different from the control group in each study. Conclusions: Following the vaccination, NMAEs are common of which headache and myalgia comprised a considerable measure, although life-threatening unsolicited events are rare. NMAEs should be continuously monitored during the ongoing global COVID-19 vaccination program.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e047344
Author(s):  
Qingwu Wu ◽  
Lianxiong Yuan ◽  
Huijun Qiu ◽  
Xinyue Wang ◽  
Xuekun Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and to identify evidence gaps that will guide future research on omalizumab for CRSwNP.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesA comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library on 13 October 2020.Eligibility criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing omalizumab with placebo, given for at least 16 weeks in adult patients with CRSwNP.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent authors screened search results, extracted data and assessed studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were pooled using the inverse-variance method and expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed by the χ2 test and the I2 statistic.ResultsA total of four RCTs involving 303 participants were identified. When comparing omalizumab to placebo, there was a significant difference in Nasal Polyps Score (MD=−1.20; 95% CI −1.48 to −0.92), Nasal Congestion Score (MD=−0.67; 95% CI −0.86 to −0.48), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (MD=−15.62; 95% CI −19.79 to −11.45), Total Nasal Symptom Score (MD=−1.84; 95% CI −2.43 to −1.25) and reduced need for surgery (risk ratio (RR)=5.61; 95% CI 1.99 to 15.81). Furthermore, there was no difference in the risk of serious adverse events ((RR=1.40; 95% CI 0.29 to 6.80), adverse events (RR=0.83; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.15) and rescue systemic corticosteroid (RR=0.52; 95% CI 0.17 to 1.61).ConclusionsThis was the first meta-analysis that identified omalizumab significantly improved endoscopic, clinical and patient-reported outcomes in adults with moderate to severe CRSwNP and it was safe and well tolerated.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020207639.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document