scholarly journals The effect of medical and urologic disorders on the survival of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628722110433
Author(s):  
Juan José Serrano Domingo ◽  
Teresa Alonso Gordoa ◽  
Javier Lorca Álvaro ◽  
Javier Molina-Cerrillo ◽  
Arantzazu Barquín García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Neurological Disorders ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Urological Complications ◽  
History Of

Introduction: Androgenic deprivation therapies have been linked to the development of metabolic syndrome (MS) and cardiovascular diseases, which may lead to a poorer survival in patients with metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to analyze whether some cardiovascular or neurological disorders, together with other medical and urological complications, may have an effect on survival outcomes, at baseline and during treatment from patients treated with androgen pathway inhibitors (API). Material and Methods: A retrospective study of a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with mCRPC between 2010 and 2018 treated with API in the first line setting in a single center. Results: Seventy-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Baseline prognostic factors associated with worse survival were diabetes mellitus (DM) with insulin needs compared to patients without DM [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.19, p = 0.025], hypertension (HTN) (HR = 0.46, p = 0.035), and a history of stroke (HR = 0.16, p < 0.001). However, previous history of hypercholesterolemia, arrythmias, and cognitive disorders did not result in a significant worsening on survival. During treatment, patients who developed de novo HTN had the best progression free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.38, p = 0.048) and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.08, p = 0.012) compared with patients with previous HTN. Other factors related to worse outcomes included the presence of heart failure (HR = 0.31, p = 0.001), the requirement for major opioids for pain relief (HR = 0.33, p = 0.023), and the presence of bilateral ureterohydronephrosis (HR = 0.12, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Some comorbidities may be strongly involved in patient outcomes when receiving API for mCRPC. In this sense, collaborative networking between specialists and caregivers treating prostate cancer (PC) patients should be recommended, focusing on MS features, cardiovascular and neurological disorders in order to anticipate medical and surgical complications.

Metabolic syndrome in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 213-213
Author(s):  
Vincenza Conteduca ◽  
Orazio Caffo ◽  
Lisa Derosa ◽  
Antonello Veccia ◽  
Elisabetta Petracci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hormonal Therapies ◽  
The Impact

213 Background: The presence and the impact of metabolic syndrome (MS) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) men treated with novel hormonal therapies, as abiraterone, has not still been studied. The study aims to assess the impact of MS on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from time starting abiraterone. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of metastatic CRPC patients treated with abiraterone after docetaxel failure. MS, as defined by modified Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III criteria, was assessed at the time of initiation of abiraterone, during treatment and follow-up. Cox regression model was used to evaluate the role of MS on the two end-points. Results: One hundred seventy eight patients had sufficient data to assess the presence of MS. Mean age (± SD) at start of abiraterone was 74.0 ± 7.7 years. Seventy out of 178 patients (39.5%) met MS criteria at baseline, before abiraterone initiation, whereas for eleven patients this occurred during treatment. Median PFS was equal to 5 months for patients with MS versus 9 months for those without MS. Patients with MS had a 2-fold increased risk of progression or death for all causes than patients without MS (HR=1.9, 95% CI [1.3-2.7], P<0.001). Median OS was 16 months and 22 months in patients with and without MS, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, MS resulted not significantly associated to OS (HR=1.2, 95% CI [0.8-1.9], P=0.340). Conclusions: MS may represent a complication of patients treated with abiraterone. The presence of MS appears to be a risk factor for shorter PFS in patients with CRPC treated with abiraterone, even if it does not show any impact on OS, so it needs a further prospective evaluation.

Efficacy of sequential therapy comprising of docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and cabazitaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 239-239
Author(s):  
Akiyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Masashi Kato ◽  
Toyonori Tsuzuki ◽  
Momokazu Gotoh ◽  
Yushi Naito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
The Other ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

239 Background: The sequence of use of life-prolonging therapy (docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and cabazitaxel) is unclear in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods: We retrospectively identified a total of 316 patients diagnosed with CRPC from September 2003 to April 2019 at Nagoya University and its affiliated hospitals. All patients were treated with >2 life-prolonging therapies. We divided these patients into four groups based on the sequence of drug administration. The group of patients who were treated using the sequence of abiraterone to enzalutamide or enzalutamide to abiraterone was termed as AA. The group treated using the sequence of abiraterone or enzalutamide to docetaxel was termed as AD. The group treated using the sequence of docetaxel to abiraterone or enzalutamide was termed as DA. Lastly, the group treated using the sequence of docetaxel to cabazitaxel was termed as DC. We investigated the overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis of CRPC. In addition, we estimated combined progression-free survival (combined PFS) defined as the sum of the PFS of each agent. Results: The number of patients in AA, AD, DA, and DC was 106, 69, 130, and 11, respectively. Regarding AA, AD, DA, and DC, the median ages were 72, 70, 68, and 64 years, respectively. The proportion of patients who had de novo distant metastasis was 66%, 65%, 58%, and 73% in AA, AD, DA, and DC, respectively. Further, the median OS was 68.7, 54.5, 68.6, and 22.0 months for AA, AD, DA, and DC, respectively. Notably, no significant differences related to OS were observed between AA and AD ( p = 0.06), AA and DA ( p = 0.24), as well as AD and DA ( p = 0.46). The median combined PFS was 8.6, 10.1, 13.9, and 5.6 months for AA, AD, DA, and DC, respectively. In terms of combined PFS, a significant difference was observed between AA and DA ( p < 0.001) as well as AD and DA ( p = 0.003). OS and combined PFS were significantly poor in DC compared with those in the other groups. Conclusions: No significant differences related to OS were observed regarding the sequence of use of docetaxel, abiraterone, and enzalutamide. Notably, combined PFS was comparatively better in DA than in any other group.

Safety and clinical outcome of a cohort of patients (pts) with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) in a named patient program (NPP): Updated results of a retrospective study from an Italian cooperative group.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 253-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orazio Caffo ◽  
Lucia Fratino ◽  
Giovanni Lo Re ◽  
Umberto Basso ◽  
Alessandro D'Angelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Clinical Records

253 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) provided a survival advantage compared to placebo in patients (pts) with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who had received docetaxel (de Bono JS et al, NEJM 2011). The present retrospective study is aimed to assess safety and clinical outcome in an unselected CRPC population which received AA in a named patient program (NPP). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of all pts treated with AA for CRPC by NPP in our institutions. All pts have been previously treated with a docetaxel-based first-line chemotherapy and received the standard AA dose of 1,000 mg daily plus prednisone 10 mg daily. For each pt we recorded the pre- and post-AA clinical history, the AA treatment details toxicities and clinical outcomes. Results: To date we have collected a consecutive series of 245 pts from 18 Italian hospitals. The median age was 73 (range 45 to 91). The median baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 100 ng/ml (range 0.33->100.000); 79% of the pts had bone metastases, while nodal, lung and liver metastases were observed in 52%, 9%, and 7% of the pts, respectively. The median duration of AA treatment was 5 months (range, 1 to 26). Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were anemia (11 pts), fatigue (nine pts), bone pain (four pts), constipation (two pts), thrombocytopenia (two pts), nausea (one pt), diarrhea (one pt), dyspnea (one pt), edema (one pt), hypertension (one pt), hyperbilirubinemia (one pt), and hypokaliemia (one pt). A PSA reduction of more than 50% was observed in 50.9% of the pts. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6 months and 15 months, respectively; the 1 year PFS and OS rates were 24.3% and 56.9%, respectively. Conclusions: Our results have confirmed the safety and efficacy of AA in an unselected population of pts with pre-treated CRPC outside clinical trials and provided further support concerning the good safety profile of the drug.

scholarly journals Changing the History of Prostate Cancer with New Targeted Therapies

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Susana Hernando Polo ◽  
Diana Moreno Muñoz ◽  
Adriana Carolina Rosero Rodríguez ◽  
Jorge Silva Ruiz ◽  
Diana Isabel Rosero Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Therapeutic Landscape ◽  
Important Benefit ◽  
History Of ◽  
Repair Genes

The therapeutic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is changing due to the emergence of new targeted therapies for the treatment of different molecular subtypes. Some biomarkers are described as potential molecular targets different from classic androgen receptors (AR). Approximately 20–25% of mCRPCs have somatic or germline alterations in DNA repair genes involved in homologous recombination. These subtypes are usually associated with more aggressive disease. Inhibitors of the enzyme poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARPi) have demonstrated an important benefit in the treatment of these subtypes of tumors. However, tumors that resistant to PARPi and wildtype BRCA tumors do not benefit from these therapies. Recent studies are exploring drug combinations with phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) or protein kinase B (AKT) inhibitors, as mechanisms to overcome resistance or to induce BRCAness and synthetic lethality. This article reviews various different novel strategies to improve outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.

Sex Hormones and Prostate Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Auchus ◽  
Nima Sharifi
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
History Of ◽  
Prostate Cancer Research ◽  
Prostate Cancers ◽  
Androgen Independent ◽  
Transition Studies

The prostate is an androgen-dependent organ that develops only in male mammals. Prostate cancer is the most common nonskin malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer deaths. Metastatic prostate cancer initially retains its androgen dependence, and androgen-deprivation therapy often leads to disease control; however, the cancer inevitably progresses despite treatment as castration-resistant prostate cancer, the lethal form of the disease. Although it was assumed that the cancer became androgen independent during this transition, studies over the last two decades have shown that these tumors evade treatment via mechanisms that augment acquisition of androgens from circulating precursors, increase sensitivity to androgens and androgen precursors, bypass the androgen receptor, or a combination of these mechanisms. This review summarizes the history of prostate cancer research leading to the contemporary view of androgen dependence for prostate cancers and the current treatment approaches based on this modern paradigm.

scholarly journals Combined CTLA-4 and PD-L1 blockade in patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is associated with increased myeloid and neutrophil immune subsets in the bone microenvironment

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e002919
Author(s):  
Sumit K Subudhi ◽  
Bilal A Siddiqui ◽  
Ana M Aparicio ◽  
Shalini S Yadav ◽  
Sreyashi Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Microenvironment ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Measurable Disease

BackgroundImmune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has low response rates in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), in part due to few T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) promotes intratumoral T cell infiltration but induces upregulation of PD-1 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) within the prostate TME. Combined anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 can partly overcome this adaptive resistance and was recently shown to augment responses in patients with mCRPC with measurable disease. Although bone is the most common site of metastasis in prostate cancer, patients with bone-predominant disease are frequently excluded from trials because they lack measurable disease, which limits assessment of disease progression and tissue sampling. We therefore designed this study to investigate combined ICT in mCRPC to bone.HypothesisCombined anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) plus anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) is safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone.Patients and methodsIn this single-arm pilot study, men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone received tremelimumab (75 mg intravenous) plus durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous) every 4 weeks (up to four doses), followed by durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous) maintenance every 4 weeks (up to nine doses). The primary endpoint was incidence of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and maximal PSA decline.ResultsTwenty-six patients were treated between August 8, 2017 and March 28, 2019. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 11 patients (42%), with no grade 4 or 5 events. TRAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in three patients (12%). PSA decline ≥50% occurred in three patients (12%). Six patients (24%) achieved stable disease for >6 months. At a median follow-up of 43.6 months, median rPFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.9 to 5.7), and median overall survival was 28.1 months (95% CI: 14.5 to 37.3). Post-treatment evaluation of the bone microenvironment revealed transcriptional upregulation in myeloid and neutrophil immune subset signatures and increased expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints.ConclusionsTremelimumab plus durvalumab was safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone, with potential activity in a small number of patients as measured by rPFS. Combination of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 blockade with therapies targeting the myeloid compartment or other inhibitory immune receptors may be necessary to overcome mechanisms of resistance within prostate bone microenvironment.Trial registration numberNCT03204812.

Prognostic impact of prior local therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikifumi Koura ◽  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Shohei Ueda ◽  
Takashi Matsumoto ◽  
Satoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Objective This study aimed to reveal the prognostic values of prior local therapy in first-line therapy using androgen receptor-axis targeting agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) or docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods The study included 303 patients treated with first-line therapy for non-metastatic and metastatic CRPC. The association between prior local therapy and therapeutic outcome including progression-free survival and overall survival was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses as well as propensity score-matched analysis. Results In univariate analysis, local prior therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.79; P = 0.0009). Overall survival, but not progression-free survival, was better among patients with prior local therapy compared with patients without prior local therapy even after multivariate analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusions This study robustly indicated that prior local treatment was prognostic for overall survival among patients with CRPC. This finding is useful to predict patient prognosis in CRPC.

Phase II trial of opaganib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing on abiraterone or enzalutamide (NCT04207255).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS191-TPS191
Author(s):  
Omer Kucuk ◽  
Charles Smith ◽  
Terry Plasse ◽  
Besim Ogretmen ◽  
Shikhar Mehrotra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Immune Modulation ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Trafficking ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Sphingosine 1 Phosphate

TPS191 Background: Opaganib (Yeliva, ABC294640) is a first-in-class, sphingosine kinase-2 (SK2) selective inhibitor, with anticancer, anti-inflammatory and anti-viral activities. SK2, a lipid kinase catalyzes formation of the lipid signaling molecule sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P). S1P promotes cancer growth, and proliferation and pathological inflammation, including inflammatory cytokine production. Specifically, by inhibiting the SK2 enzyme, opaganib blocks the synthesis of S1P which regulates fundamental biological processes such as cell proliferation, migration, immune cell trafficking and angiogenesis, and are also involved in immune-modulation and suppression of innate immune responses from T cells. Opaganib is a sphingosine-competitive inhibitor of SK2 and also inhibits dihydroceramide desaturase. Opaganib has antitumor activity against human and murine prostate cancer cell lines, and in xenograft (LNCaP) and syngeneic (MycCAP, TRAMP-C1) murine tumor models. In addition to its target effect of reducing sphingosine-1-phosphate, opaganib reduces both MYC and AR proteins through its kinase-blocking and desaturase-inhibiting properties, respectively. Methods: The study is open to patients with mCRPC who have been treated with at least one newer androgen antagonist (abiraterone or enzalutamide) and no prior chemotherapy for castration-resistant disease. Patients who are failing either abiraterone or enzalutamide may enroll, with the addition of opaganib. The trial design includes brief safety lead-in cohort 1a (abiraterone + opaganib 250 mg Q 12hr, 3/3 enrolled) and 1b (enzalutamide + opaganib 250 mg Q 12hr, 3/3 enrolled). These cohorts have been completed without any DLTs. We are now enrolling cohort 2 (abiraterone + opaganib 500 mg Q 12hr, 0/27 enrolled) and cohort 3 (enzalutamide + opaganib 500 mg Q 12hr, 8/27 enrolled). A total of 60 patients will be enrolled and response will be evaluated after 4 cycles (28 days/cycle) using a composite metric based on PSA, bone scan and RECIST measurements per PCWG3 criteria. Safety and tolerability will be monitored, and dose modifications will be allowed. Primary endpoint is disease control (stable disease or better) after 4 cycles. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, radiographic progression-free survival and PSA progression-free survival. Correlative studies include assessment of quality of life (QOL), circulating MDSCs, immune cells and clones with amplified AR or MYC. Supported by NIH grant P01 CA203628. Clinical trial information: NCT04207255.

scholarly journals Cabazitaxel for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Retrospective Data Analysis from an Indian Centre

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 506-515
Author(s):  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Vamshi Krishna Muddu ◽  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Kumar Prabhash
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Retrospective Data Analysis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Named Patient Programme

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients from the named patient programme (NPP) at our centre. Methods: mCRPC patients who progressed on docetaxel were given cabazitaxel intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Overall survival, progression-free survival, prostate-specific antigen response, quality of life (QOL) changes, and safety were reported. Results: Nine men received cabazitaxel (median: 7 cycles; range: 1–27) under the NPP and were followed until death. Median survival was 14.07 months (1.07–23.80) and progression-free survival was 2.67 months (1.07–20.27). QOL was stable for most patients. Common adverse events (grade ≥3) were neutropenia (n = 8), anaemia (n = 4), and leucopenia (n = 4). Conclusion: These data from 9 patients are consistent with the results reported in the TROPIC study with a manageable safety profile.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document