The Efficacy of the Web ABC Program on Improving Coping, Self-Competence, and Quality of Life in Chinese American Adolescents

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-151
Author(s):  
Jyu-Lin Chen ◽  
Bruce Cooper
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0243329
Author(s):  
Tanja E. Hamm-Faber ◽  
Yvonne Engels ◽  
Kris C. P. Vissers ◽  
Dylan J. H. A. Henssen

Background The clinical outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) therapy in patients with a Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) is mostly done by standardized pain and quality of life measurements instruments and hardly account for personal feelings and needs as a basis for a patient-centred approach and shared decision making. Objectives The objective of this study is to explore perspectives on personal health and quality of life (QoL) in FBSS patients concerning their physical-, psychological and spiritual well-being prior to receiving an SCS system. Methods We performed face-to-face, semi-structured, in-depth interviews to obtain descriptive and detailed data on personal health, guided by the Web diagram of Positive Health (Huber et al.) and a topic list. The following main topics were assessed qualitatively: 1) Bodily functioning, 2) Mental function and perception 3) Spiritual dimension, 4) Quality of life, 5) Social and societal participation and 6) Daily functioning. Results Seventeen FBSS patients (eight male, nine female) were included from April–November 2019 at the department of pain medicine in the Albert Schweitzer Hospital in the Netherlands. Median age 49 years; range 28 to 67 years, and patients underwent between one and five lumbar surgical operations. The duration of their chronic pain was between four and 22 years. After analyzing the interviews, three themes emerged: 1) dealing with chronic pain, 2) the current situation regarding aspects of positive health, and 3) future perspectives on health and quality of life. These themes arose from eleven categories and a hundred ninety codes. Conclusion This qualitative study explored FBSS patients ‘views on their health and the ability to adapt to daily life having complex chronic pain, and showed that patients experienced shortcomings in daily life within the six dimensions of the Web diagram of Positive Health before the SCS implant.


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1442-1448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Barrett ◽  
Alice Chu ◽  
Jack Chen ◽  
Kin Yui Lam ◽  
Russell Portenoy ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1162-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang-yu Chou ◽  
Marylin Dodd ◽  
Donald Abrams ◽  
Geraldine Padilla

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hicran Bektas ◽  
Hasan Senol Coskun ◽  
Fatma Arikan ◽  
Keziban Ozcan ◽  
Aysel Tekeli ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose This study aims to develop a web-based education program among cancer patients undergoing treatment of systemic chemotherapy and to evaluate the effect of the program on symptom control, quality of life, self-efficacy, and depression. Methods A web-based education program was prepared in line with patient needs, evidence-based guidelines, and expert opinions and tested with 10 cancer patients. A single-blind, randomised controlled study design was applied at a medical oncology unit of a university hospital. Pretests were applied to 60 cancer patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy, and the patients (intervention:30, control: 30) were randomized. The intervention group used the web-based education program for three months, and they were allowed to communicate with researchers 24/7 via the website. The effectiveness of the web-based education program at baseline and after 12 weeks was evaluated. The CONSORT 2010 guideline was performed. Results Expert opinions were found to be compatible with each other (Kendall's Wa = 0.233, p=0.008). The difference between symptom control (p=0.026) and quality of life (p=0.001) during the three-month follow-up of the groups were statistically significant, and there was no difference between the groups in terms of self-efficacy and depression levels (p˃0.05). Conclusion The web-based education program was found to be effective in remote symptom management and improving the quality of life of cancer patients. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT05076916 (12 October 2021, retrospectively registered)


10.2196/17497 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. e17497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Morton ◽  
Sharon HJ Hou ◽  
Oonagh Fogarty ◽  
Greg Murray ◽  
Steven Barnes ◽  
...  

Background Quality of life (QoL) is considered a key treatment outcome in bipolar disorder (BD) across research, clinical, and self-management contexts. Web-based assessment of patient-reported outcomes offer numerous pragmatic benefits but require validation to ensure measurement equivalency. A web-based version of the Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD) questionnaire was developed (QoL Tool). Objective This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of a web-based QoL self-report questionnaire for BD (QoL Tool). Key aims were to (1) characterize the QoL of the sample using the QoL Tool, (2) evaluate the internal consistency of the web-based measure, and (3) determine whether the factor structure of the original version of the QoL.BD instrument was replicated in the web-based instrument. Methods Community-based participatory research methods were used to inform the development of a web-based adaptation of the QoL.BD instrument. Individuals with BD who registered for an account with the QoL Tool were able to opt in to sharing their data for research purposes. The distribution of scores and internal consistency estimates, as indicated by Cronbach alpha, were inspected. An exploratory factor analysis using maximum likelihood and oblique rotation was conducted. Inspection of the scree plot, eigenvalues, and minimum average partial correlation were used to determine the optimal factor structure to extract. Results A total of 498 people with BD (349/498, 70.1% female; mean age 39.64, SD 12.54 years; 181/498, 36.3% BD type I; 195/498, 39.2% BD type II) consented to sharing their QoL Tool data for the present study. Mean scores across the 14 QoL Tool domains were, in general, significantly lower than that of the original QoL.BD validation sample. Reliability estimates for QoL Tool domains were comparable with that observed for the QoL.BD instrument (Cronbach alpha=.70-.93). Exploratory factor analysis supported the extraction of an 11-factor model, with item loadings consistent with the factor structure suggested by the original study. Findings for the sleep and physical domains differed from the original study, with this analysis suggesting one shared latent construct. Conclusions The psychometric properties of the web-based QoL Tool are largely concordant with the original pen-and-paper QoL.BD, although some minor differences in the structure of the sleep and physical domains were observed. Despite this small variation from the factor structure identified in the QoL.BD instrument, the latent factor structure of the QoL Tool largely reproduced the original findings and theoretical structure of QoL areas relevant to people with BD. These findings underscore the research and clinical utility of this instrument, but further comparison of the psychometric properties of the QoL Tool relative to the QoL.BD instrument is warranted. Future adaptations of the QoL Tool, including the production of an app-based version of the QoL Tool, are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document