scholarly journals A Comprehensive Summary of Systematic Reviews on Sports Injury Prevention Strategies

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712110357
Author(s):  
Samuel D. Stephenson ◽  
Joseph W. Kocan ◽  
Amrit V. Vinod ◽  
Melissa A. Kluczynski ◽  
Leslie J. Bisson
Keyword(s):  
Injury Prevention ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Sports Injury ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Musculoskeletal Injuries ◽  
Ice Hockey ◽  
Prevention Strategies ◽  
Evidence Level ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background: A large volume of systematic reviews and meta-analyses has been published on the effectiveness of sports injury prevention programs. Purpose: To provide a qualitative summary of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have examined the effectiveness of sports injury prevention programs on reducing musculoskeletal injuries. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for systematic reviews and meta-analyses that evaluated the effectiveness of sports injury prevention programs. We excluded published abstracts, narrative reviews, articles not published in English, commentaries, studies that described sports injury prevention strategies but did not assess their effectiveness, studies that did not assess musculoskeletal injuries, and studies that did not assess sports-related injuries. The most relevant results were extracted and summarized. Levels of evidence were determined per the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, and methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews, revised version). Results: A total of 507 articles were retrieved, and 129 were included. Articles pertaining to all injuries were divided into 9 topics: sports and exercise in general (n = 20), soccer (n = 13), ice hockey (n = 1), dance (n = 1), volleyball (n = 1), basketball (n = 1), tackle collision sports (n = 1), climbing (n = 1), and youth athletes (n = 4). Articles on injuries by anatomic site were divided into 11 topics: general knee (n = 8), anterior cruciate ligament (n = 34), ankle (n = 14), hamstring (n = 11), lower extremity (n = 10), foot (n = 6), groin (n = 2), shoulder (n = 1), wrist (n = 2), and elbow (n = 1). Of the 129 studies, 45.7% were ranked as evidence level 1, and 55.0% were evidence level 2. Based on the AMSTAR-2, 58.9% of the reviews reported a priori review methods, 96.1% performed a comprehensive literature search, 47.3% thoroughly described excluded articles, 79.1% assessed risk of bias for individual studies, 48.8% reported a valid method for statistical combination of data (ie, meta-analysis), 45.0% examined the effect of risk of bias on pooled study results, and 19.4% examined the risk for publication bias. Conclusion: This comprehensive review provides sports medicine providers with a single source of the most up-to-date publications in the literature on sports injury prevention.

11.361 sports injuries in a 15-year survey of a Level I emergency trauma department reveal different severe injury types in the 6 most common team sports

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (02) ◽  
pp. 111-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Krutsch ◽  
Volker Krutsch ◽  
Franz Hilber ◽  
Christian Pfeifer ◽  
Florian Baumann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Prevention ◽  
Team Sports ◽  
Sports Injury ◽  
Ice Hockey ◽  
American Football ◽  
Prevention Strategies ◽  
Team Handball ◽  
Body Regions ◽  
Multiple Injured ◽  
Level I

Abstract Introduction Severe sports-related injuries are a common affliction treated in Level I trauma departments. Detailed knowledge on injury characteristics from different medical settings is essential to improve the development of injury prevention strategies in different team sports. Methods Team sport injuries were retrospectively analysed in a Level I trauma department registry over 15 years. Injury and treatment data were compared with regard to competition and training exposure. Injury data such as “time of visitation”, “type of injury”, “multiple injured body regions” and “immediate hospitalisation” helped to define the severity level of each team sports injury. Results At the Level I trauma department, 11.361 sports-related injuries were seen over 15 years, of which 34.0 % were sustained during team sports. Soccer injuries were the most common injuries of all team sports (71.4 %). The lower extremity was the most affected body region overall, followed by the upper extremity. Head injuries were mainly seen in Ice hockey and American football and concussion additionally frequently in team handball. Slight injuries like sprains or contusions occurred most frequently in all team sports. In soccer and team handball, injuries sustained in competition were significantly more severe (p < 0.001) than those sustained in practice.Volleyball and basketball had a trend to higher rate of severe injuries sustained during practice sessions. Conclusion Depending on the specific injury profile of each team sports, injury prevention strategies should address competitive as well as training situations, whichmay need different strategies.

scholarly journals Injury prevention protocols in male soccer players: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Barrera ◽  
◽  
Antonio J. Figueiredo ◽  
Filipe Manuel Clemente ◽  
José Afonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Injury Prevention ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Review Question ◽  
Meta Analyses

Review question / Objective: This article synthesizes the findings of systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyzes (SRMA) available on injury prevention programs in male soccer players and their effectiveness. Condition being studied: The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the systematic reviews and meta-analyzes published up to now, on injury prevention programs and their effectiveness in male soccer players, trying to find a broader vision on the strategies most used for this. problem that affects so many clubs and athletes. Additionally, this research will allow a better understanding of the spread of summary effects, heterogeneity, evidence of bias, and the quality of the findings.

Does prevention pay off? Economic aspects of sports injury prevention: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. bjsports-2021-104241
Author(s):  
Christoph Lutter ◽  
Christophe Jacquet ◽  
Evert Verhagen ◽  
Romain Seil ◽  
Thomas Tischer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Injury Prevention ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Sports Injury ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Prevention Strategies ◽  
Level Of Evidence

ObjectiveTo identify, summarise and critically assess economic evaluation studies on sports injury prevention strategies.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesPubMed, SportDiscuss.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesThe current literature was searched following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Economic analyses published since 2010 were checked for inclusion. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Oxford Level of Evidence for economic and decision analysis; underlying randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were rated according to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale, and risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.ResultsTen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The quality assessment revealed limited data quality. For trial-based analysis, underlying RCTs were of good quality and had a low risk of bias. Prevention concepts for general injury reduction showed effectiveness and cost savings. Regarding specific injury types, the analysis of the studies showed that the best data are available for ankle, hamstring and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Measures using specific training interventions were the predominant form of prevention concepts; studies investigating these concepts showed cost-effectiveness with total cost savings between €24.82 and €462 per athlete.ConclusionInjury prevention strategies that were studied are cost-effective. However, estimates and outcomes vary throughout the included studies, and precluded pooling of existing data. Knowledge about the cost-effectiveness of evaluated prevention measures will help improve the acceptance and application of prevention initiatives.

scholarly journals The development of a new generic risk-of-bias measure for systematic reviews of surveys

Methodology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-298
Author(s):  
Gabriel Nudelman ◽  
Kathleen Otto
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Interrater Agreement ◽  
Bias Measure ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Initial List

It is important to evaluate risk of bias of the primary studies included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Since tools pertinent to surveys are scarce, the goal of the current research was to develop a measure to address this need. In Study 1, an initial list of 10 relevant topics was compiled from previous measures. In Study 2, the list was refined into an eight-item risk-of-bias measure via discussion and a pilot study. In Study 3, experienced researchers used the measure to asses 70 studies, demonstrating high interrater agreement (weighted Kappa = .82). Inexperienced raters also utilized the measure to code 26 different studies included in a prior meta-analysis, which resulted in adequate interrater agreement (weighted Kappa = .64) and excellent convergent validity (r = .66). Thus, the new measure, designed to be accessible and flexible, can increase standardization of risk-of-bias evaluations and contribute to the interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analytic findings.

scholarly journals Processed Meat Consumption and the Risk of Cancer: A Critical Evaluation of the Constraints of Current Evidence from Epidemiological Studies

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 3601
Author(s):  
Mina Nicole Händel ◽  
Jeanett Friis Rohde ◽  
Ramune Jacobsen ◽  
Berit Lilienthal Heitmann
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Meat Products ◽  
Meat Consumption ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
Processed Meat Consumption

Based on a large volume of observational scientific studies and many summary papers, a high consumption of meat and processed meat products has been suggested to have a harmful effect on human health. These results have led guideline panels worldwide to recommend to the general population a reduced consumption of processed meat and meat products, with the overarching aim of lowering disease risk, especially of cancer. We revisited and updated the evidence base, evaluating the methodological quality and the certainty of estimates in the published systematic reviews and meta-analyses that examined the association between processed meat consumption and the risk of cancer at different sites across the body, as well as the overall risk of cancer mortality. We further explored if discrepancies in study designs and risks of bias could explain the heterogeneity observed in meta-analyses. In summary, there are severe methodological limitations to the majority of the previously published systematic reviews and meta-analyses that examined the consumption of processed meat and the risk of cancer. Many lacked the proper assessment of the methodological quality of the primary studies they included, or the literature searches did not fulfill the methodological standards needed in order to be systematic and transparent. The primary studies included in the reviews had a potential risk for the misclassification of exposure, a serious risk of bias due to confounding, a moderate to serious risk of bias due to missing data, and/or a moderate to serious risk of selection of the reported results. All these factors may have potentially led to the overestimation of the risk related to processed meat intake across all cancer outcomes. Thus, with the aim of lowering the risk of cancer, the recommendation to reduce the consumption of processed meat and meat products in the general population seems to be based on evidence that is not methodologically strong.

Auriculoterapia para o tratamento da ansiedade em estudantes universitários: revisão sistemática

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Lara dos Santos Silva
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Tecnología Educativa

A ansiedade está entre os transtornos mentais de maior prevalência na população mundial, sendo a segunda causa de incapacidade mental no mundo. Dentre a população suscetível à ansiedade, destacam-se os estudantes universitários, em decorrência das situações vivenciadas no âmbito acadêmico. Os tratamentos da ansiedade podem estar pautados em recursos medicamentosos e não medicamentosos. Dentre os não medicamentosos, destacam-se as Práticas Integrativas e Complementares em Saúde e, dentre estas, a auriculoterapia. O objetivo geral deste estudo foi s intetizar as evidências disponíveis na literatura científica sobre o uso da auriculoterapia no tratamento da ansiedade em estudantes universitários. Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática da literatura, realizada em 16 bases de dados, com início em 20 de janeiro e revisão até 27 de março de 2021. Todo o processo de busca e seleção dos artigos foi feito de modo independente e pareado, e, quando necessário, um terceiro pesquisador com experiência na temática auxiliava como ad hoc na resolução dos conflitos. O relato da revisão pautou-se na diretriz Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, e o protocolo da revisão foi cadastrado na plataforma International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registro No CRD42020205968). Utilizou-se as diretrizes Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture, Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool, e escala de JADAD para avaliação dos artigos. A amostra final foi composta por cinco artigos. A análise dos mesmos mostrou que a auriculoterapia contribuiu para tratar a ansiedade de estudantes universitários. O uso desta intervenção deve ser considerado pelas instituições formadoras para promoção da saúde mental nesta população, e pode contribuir para a melhora do desempenho acadêmico, redução das taxas de evasão, e melhora da qualidade de vida aos universitários. O estudo também possibilitou a elaboração de uma tecnologia educativa no formato de cartilha, com o objetivo de esclarecer aos estudantes universitários sobre a ansiedade como um problema de saúde relevante na população, bem como apresentar a auriculoterapia como uma possibilidade terapêutica. Pretende-se que, em momento oportuno, a mesma seja divulgada em formato eletrônico para toda a comunidade acadêmica. Palavras-chave: Auriculoterapia. Terapia auricular. Ansiedade. Estudantes.

scholarly journals When poorly conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses can mislead: a critical appraisal and update of systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining the effects of probiotics in the treatment of functional constipation in children

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca G Harris ◽  
Elizabeth P Neale ◽  
Isabel Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Weighted Mean Difference ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Functional Constipation ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Defecation Frequency ◽  
Meta Analyses

ABSTRACT Background Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of functional constipation in children have yielded conflicting results. Objectives The aim of this study was to critically review and update the evidence in this field by mapping all the steps involved against those reported in previous reviews, in an attempt to understand the nature of their conflicting results. Methods Four literature databases, trial registries, and citations were searched through December 1, 2018. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of probiotics compared with placebo or treatment as usual on defecation frequency [bowel movements (BMs)/wk] or treatment success rates in children with functional constipation. Independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed risk of bias in each RCT. Data were pooled with (inverse variance) random-effects models. Results We identified 17 RCTs, of which 14 and 11 provided sufficient data to enable meta-analysis of the effects of probiotics compared with control on defecation frequency (n = 965) or treatment success (n = 835), respectively. When compared to (any) control intervention, probiotics did not significantly increase defecation frequency [weighted mean difference (WMD): 0.28 BMs/wk; 95% CI: −0.12, 0.69; P = 0.165] but were more efficacious in achieving treatment success (RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.50; P = 0.024). These effects did not differ by type of control (i.e., active or inactive) intervention. However, in analyses confined to the RCTs that were free of high risk of bias (only 5), probiotics did not confer any beneficial effects on defecation frequency (WMD: −0.55 BMs/wk; 95% CI: −1.37, 0.26; P = 0.185) and achievement of treatment success (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.13; P = 0.873), compared with control interventions. Conclusions The current evidence thus does not support the use of probiotics as a single or coadjuvant therapy for treatment of functional constipation in children and refutes recently published reviews reporting favorable effects of probiotics. Conflicting findings of previous reviews resulted from methodologic errors, highlighting the susceptibility of evidence synthesis to oversights in study selection, quality assessments, and data extraction and collation. This review was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42019119109.

High Risk of Bias and Low Transparency in “How Effective are F-MARC Injury Prevention Programs for Soccer Players? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Thorborg ◽  
Kasper Krommes ◽  
Ernest Esteve ◽  
Mikkel Bek Clausen ◽  
Else Marie Bartels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Injury Prevention ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Soccer Players

Is grey literature essential for a better control of publication bias in psychiatry? An example from three meta-analyses of schizophrenia

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 550-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luis R. Martin ◽  
Víctor Pérez ◽  
Montse Sacristán ◽  
Enric Álvarez
Keyword(s):  
Publication Bias ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Medical Databases ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Heterogeneous Nature ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Literature Material

AbstractSystematic reviews in mental health have become useful tools for health professionals in view of the massive amount and heterogeneous nature of biomedical information available today. In order to determine the risk of bias in the studies evaluated and to avoid bias in generalizing conclusions from the reviews it is therefore important to use a very strict methodology in systematic reviews. One bias which may affect the generalization of results is publication bias, which is determined by the nature and direction of the study results. To control or minimize this type of bias, the authors of systematic reviews undertake comprehensive searches of medical databases and expand on the findings, often undertaking searches of grey literature (material which is not formally published). This paper attempts to show the consequences (and risk) of generalizing the implications of grey literature in the control of publication bias, as was proposed in a recent systematic work. By repeating the analyses for the same outcome from three different systematic reviews that included both published and grey literature our results showed that confusion between grey literature and publication bias may affect the results of a concrete meta-analysis.

Injury Prevention: Avoiding One of Golf's More Painful Hazards

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 129-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M Lindsay ◽  
Theo H Versteegh ◽  
Anthony A Vandervoort
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Injury Prevention ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Musculoskeletal Injuries ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Prevention Strategies

Although the sport of golf may be mistakenly perceived as a benign physical activity, there are in fact patterns of problems such as strains to the upper limb and low-back pain that have the potential to interfere with the professional golfer's livelihood and recreational golfer's enjoyment. In this article, a summary of the literature has been provided outlining the nature and extent of common musculoskeletal injuries that golfers deal with as well as some of the risk factors that may increase injury susceptibility. A detailed overview of prevention strategies to minimize the risk of suffering a golf injury has also been provided. Since many injuries arise from poor swing biomechanics, taking instruction with a knowledgeable golf instructor can be an important first step towards injury prevention. However, if a golfing client already has an injury which originated or is aggravated by playing or practicing, then the personalized help of a physician or physiotherapist experienced in golf biomechanics is also warranted. Proper attention to prevention will ensure a lifetime of enjoyable golf “par”ticipation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document