scholarly journals Redirecting T cells to hematological malignancies with bispecific antibodies

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mireya Paulina Velasquez ◽  
Challice L. Bonifant ◽  
Stephen Gottschalk

Abstract There is a need to improve outcomes for patients with recurrent and/or refractory hematological malignancies. Immunotherapy holds the promise to meet this need, because it does not rely on the cytotoxic mechanism of conventional therapies. Among different forms of immunotherapy, redirecting T cells to hematological malignancies with bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) is an attractive strategy. BsAbs are an “off-the-shelf” product that is easily scalable in contrast to adoptive T-cell therapies. Among these, the bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab has emerged as the most successful BsAb to date. It consists of 2 single-chain variable fragments specific for CD19 present on B-cell malignancies and CD3 expressed on almost all T cells. Blinatumomab has shown potent antitumor activity as a single agent, particularly for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, resulting in its US Food and Drug Administration approval. However, although successful in inducing remissions, these are normally short-lived, with median response durations of <1 year. Nevertheless, the success of blinatumomab has reinvigorated the BsAb field, which is bustling with preclinical and clinical studies for not only B-cell–derived lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma but also acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma. Here, we will review the successes and challenges of T-cell–targeted BsAbs for the immunotherapy of hematological malignancies with special focus on conducted clinical studies and strategies to improve their efficacy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Schmidts ◽  
Marc Wehrli ◽  
Marcela V. Maus

Adoptive transfer of T cells modified with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR-T cells) has changed the therapeutic landscape of hematological malignancies, particularly for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and large B cell lymphoma, where two different CAR-T products are now considered standard of care. Furthermore, intense research efforts are under way to expand the clinical application of CAR-T cell therapy for the benefit of patients suffering from other types of cancers. Nevertheless, CAR-T cell treatment is associated with toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome, which can range in severity from mild flu-like symptoms to life-threatening vasodilatory shock, and a neurological syndrome termed ICANS (immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome), which can also range in severity from a temporary cognitive deficit lasting only a few hours to lethal cerebral edema. In this review, we provide an in-depth discussion of different types of CAR-T cell–associated toxicities, including an overview of clinical presentation and grading, pathophysiology, and treatment options. We also address future perspectives and opportunities, with a special focus on hematological malignancies. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 72 is January 27, 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aamir Ahmad ◽  
Shahab Uddin ◽  
Martin Steinhoff

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is an exciting development in the field of cancer immunology, wherein immune T-cells from patients are collected, engineered to create ‘CAR’-T cells, and infused back into the same patient. Currently, two CAR-T-cell-based therapies, Tisagenlecleucel and Axicabtagene ciloleucel, are approved by FDA for the treatment of hematological malignancies, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and large B-cell lymphomas. Their approval has been a culmination of several phase I and II clinical studies, which are the subject of discussion in this review article. Over the years, CAR-T cells have evolved to be significantly more persistent in patients’ blood, resulting in a much-improved clinical response and disease remission. This is particularly significant given that the target patient populations of these therapies are those with relapsed and refractory disease who have often progressed on multiple therapies. Despite the promising clinical results, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed. Of particular note are the associated toxicities exemplified by cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the neurotoxicity. CRS has been addressed by an FDA-approved therapy of its own—tocilizumab. This article focuses on the progress related to CAR-T therapy: the pertinent clinical studies and their major findings, their associated adverse effects, and future perspective.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (584) ◽  
pp. eabd3595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Paul ◽  
Alexander H. Pearlman ◽  
Jacqueline Douglass ◽  
Brian J. Mog ◽  
Emily Han-Chung Hsiue ◽  
...  

Immunotherapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and bispecific antibodies redirect healthy T cells to kill cancer cells expressing the target antigen. The pan-B cell antigen–targeting immunotherapies have been remarkably successful in treating B cell malignancies. Such therapies also result in the near-complete loss of healthy B cells, but this depletion is well tolerated by patients. Although analogous targeting of pan-T cell markers could, in theory, help control T cell cancers, the concomitant healthy T cell depletion would result in severe and unacceptable immunosuppression. Thus, therapies directed against T cell cancers require more selective targeting. Here, we describe an approach to target T cell cancers through T cell receptor (TCR) antigens. Each T cell, normal or malignant, expresses a unique TCR β chain generated from 1 of 30 TCR β chain variable gene families (TRBV1 to TRBV30). We hypothesized that bispecific antibodies targeting a single TRBV family member expressed in malignant T cells could promote killing of these cancer cells, while preserving healthy T cells that express any of the other 29 possible TRBV family members. We addressed this hypothesis by demonstrating that bispecific antibodies targeting TRBV5-5 (α-V5) or TRBV12 (α-V12) specifically lyse relevant malignant T cell lines and patient-derived T cell leukemias in vitro. Treatment with these antibodies also resulted in major tumor regressions in mouse models of human T cell cancers. This approach provides an off-the-shelf, T cell cancer selective targeting approach that preserves enough healthy T cells to maintain cellular immunity.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 228-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangyou Liu ◽  
Biping Deng ◽  
Jing PAN ◽  
Zhichao Yin ◽  
Yuehui Lin ◽  
...  

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most prominent and potentially life-threatening toxicity caused by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, therefore, effectively controlling severe CRS is critical to ensure patient safety. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, has been widely used to treat CRS, whereas it is not clear if corticosteroids could be as another optimal choice for managing CRS. We applied corticosteroids instead of tocilizumab as the first-line agent to control CRS in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia during CAR-T therapy. The impacts of steroids on treatment efficiency and kinetics of CAR-T cells were assessed by comparing two groups of patients who did (42 cases) or did not (26 cases) receive steroids. Patients followed up less than one month (went to other hospitals for transplantation or died within one month) were excluded. Treatment effects were evaluated on day 30 after T-cell infusion and then monthly in follow-up patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was detected by multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM) and quantitative PCR for fusion genes. The dynamic monitoring of CAR-T cells was performed through flow cytometric quantitation of FITC+CD3+ T cells. B-cell aplasia (BCA) was assayed by FCM. Dexamethasone or methylprednisolone or both (alternately) were administrated. Dexamethasone was used in most cases especially for patients with neurologic symptoms; methylprednisolone was preferred for patients with pulmonary or liver dysfunction, and patients accepting high dose steroids. Steroids started with low dose and could be increased if symptoms were not resolved, for severe CRS, steroids would be escalated up to dexamethasone 20mg/m2/d or more higher up to methylprednisolone 10mg/kg/d. Once CRS was improved, steroids were rapidly reduced and stopped. A total of 68 patients (28 adults and 40 children younger than 18 years) were included, 22 (32.4%) presented with extramedullary diseases (EMD), bone marrow blasts in patients without EMD varied between 5%-96.5%, 31 (45.6%) patients had an allogeneic transplantation, 54 (79.4%) cases received CD19-specific and 14 (20.6%) received CD22-specific CAR-T therapy. Forty-two (61.8%) cases, including all (10) of grade III CRS, 68.2% (30/44) of grade II CRS and 2 patients with no CRS but with GVHD (1 case) or neurotoxicity (1 case), were administered steroids, among them, 23/42 (54.8%) received high dose steroids (&gt;10mg/m2/d dexamethasone or equivalent), the duration of steroid use was 1-16 days (78.6% &lt;= 7 days); whereas 26 (38.2%) patients were not given any steroids but the supportive care. We found that there was no difference either in complete remission (CR) rate (95.2% vs 92.3%, p=.344) or in MRD negative CR rate (80.0% vs 79.2%, p=.249) between steroid and non-steroid group, verified that corticosteroids even high dose steroids did not influence the treatment response. Furthermore, we investigated the dynamics of CAR-T cells. Firstly, the expansion of CAR-T cells in peripheral blood (PB) was evaluated, the average CAR-T cell counts in steroid group were significantly higher than those in non-steroid group on D11 (p=.0302), D15 (p=.0053), D20 (p=.0045) and D30 (p=.0028), except for D7 when CAR-T cells began to expand (p=.9815), this demonstrated that steroids did not suppress the proliferation of CAR-T cells in PB. Secondly, the percentages of patients with detectable CAR-T cells in bone marrow (BM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were compared between steroid and non-steroid group, there were no differences both in BM (85.2% vs 78.6%, p=.923) and in CSF (68.6% vs 57.9%, p=.433), which implied steroids did not influence the trafficking of T-cells to BM and CSF. Thirdly, we monitored B-cell aplasia (BCA) in part of patients followed-up more than 2 months without further treatments, the percentages of patients with BCA in steroid group had no significant differences compared to non-steroid group at 2-month (p=.086) and 3-month (p=.146). Later, although limited cases left, in the steroid group, 100% of patients (4-month, 7/7; 5-month, 7/7; 6-month, 5/5) still maintained BCA and CR, indicating that corticosteroids did not impact the duration of functional CAR-T cells. In conclusion, corticosteroids do not compromise the treatment efficacy and kinetics of CAR-T cells, could be as a feasible and effective approach to manage CAR-T associated CRS. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 810-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiying Qin ◽  
Sang M Nguyen ◽  
Sneha Ramakrishna ◽  
Samiksha Tarun ◽  
Lila Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Treatment of pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) using chimeric antigen receptor expressing T cells (CART) targeting CD19 have demonstrated impressive clinical results in children and young adults with up to 70-90% complete remission rate in multiple clinical trials. However, about 30% of patients relapse due to loss of the targeted epitope on CD19 or CART failure. Our CD22-targeted CAR trial has generated promising results in relapsed/refractory ALL, including CD19 antigen negative ALL, but relapse associated with decreased CD22 site density has occurred. Thus, developing strategies to prevent relapses due to changes in antigen expression have the potential to increase the likelihood of durable remissions. In addition, dual targeting of both CD19 and CD22 on pre-B ALL may be synergistic compared to targeting a single antigen, a potential approach to improve efficacy in patients with heterogeneous expression of CD19 and CD22 on leukemic blasts. We describe the systematic development and comparison of the structure and therapeutic function of three different types (over 15 different constructs) of novel CARs targeting both CD19 and CD22: (1) Bivalent Tandem CAR, (2) Bivalent Loop CAR, and (3) Bicistronic CAR. These dual CARs were assembled using CD19- and CD22-binding single chain fragment variable (scFv) regions derived from clinically validated single antigen targeted CARs. They are structurally different in design: both tandem and loop CARs have the CD19 and CD22 scFv covalently linked in the same CAR in different orders, whereas, bicistronic CARs have 2 complete CAR constructs connected with a cleavable linker. The surface expression on the transduced T cell of the CD19/CD22 dual CARs was detected with CD22 Fc and anti-idiotype of CD19 and compared to single CD19 or CD22 CARs. Activities of dual CARs to either CD19 or CD22 were evaluated in vitro with cytotoxicity assays or killing assays against K562 cells expressing either CD19 or CD22 or both antigens and also tested against a leukemia CD19+/CD22+ cell line, NALM6, and NALM6 with CRISPER/CAS9 knockout of CD19 or CD22 or both antigens. Therapeutic function of the top candidates of the dual CARs was then validated in vivo against these NALM6 leukemia lines. Some of these dual CARs were also further tested against patient-derived xenografts. Finally, we tested the dual targeting CARs in an artificial relapse model in which mice were co-injected with a mix of CD19 knockout and CD22 knockout NALM6 leukemia lines. From these studies, we established that the order of the scFv, size of the linker, type of leader sequence, and co-stimulatory domain in the CAR constructs all impact the efficacy of the dual targeting CARs. Tandem, Loop, and Bicistronic CARs all demonstrate some levels of in vitro and in vivo activities, but the bicistronic CAR was most effective at clearing leukemia and preventing relapse. In the CD19+/CD22+ NALM6 model, bicistronic CAR treated mice remain disease free while CD19 CAR or CD22 CAR treated mice already died or relapsed on day 27. In the relapse model, as expected, CD19 or CD22 single CAR T cell treatment resulted in progression of the corresponding antigen-negative NALM6. Treatment with dual targeted bicistronic CARs resulted in clearance of both CD19 and CD22 negative ALL with durable remission. In summary, we described novel CD19/CD22 dual targeting CARs with robust pre-clinical activity against pre-B cell ALL, and validated this approach in the prevention of resistance to single-antigen targeted CARs in preclinical models. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Antibodies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Vladimir Voynov ◽  
Paul J. Adam ◽  
Andrew E. Nixon ◽  
Justin M. Scheer

T-cell Engaging bispecific antibodies (TcEs) that can re-direct cytotoxic T-cells to kill cancer cells have been validated in clinical studies. To date, the clinical success with these agents has mainly been seen in hematologic tumor indications. However, an increasing number of TcEs are currently being developed to exploit the potent mode-of-action to treat solid tumor indications, which is more challenging in terms of tumor-cell accessibility and the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Of particular interest is the potential of TcEs as an immunotherapeutic approach for the treatment of non-immunogenic (often referred to as cold) tumors that do not respond to checkpoint inhibitors such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies. This has led to considerable discovery efforts for, firstly, the identification of tumor selective targeting approaches that can safely re-direct cytotoxic T-cells to cancer cells, and, secondly, bispecific antibodies and their derivatives with drug-like properties that promote a potent cytolytic synapse between T-cells and tumor cells, and in the most advanced TcEs, have IgG-like pharmacokinetics for dosing convenience. Based on encouraging pre-clinical data, a growing number of TcEs against a broad range of targets, and using an array of different molecular structures have entered clinical studies for solid tumor indications, and the first clinical data is beginning to emerge. This review outlines the different approaches that have been taken to date in addressing the challenges of exploiting the TcE mode-of-action for a broad range of solid indications, as well as opportunities for future discovery potential.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 4303
Author(s):  
Aamir Ahmad

CAR-T therapy has revolutionized the treatment of select hematological malignancies, namely, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and large B-cell lymphomas [...]


Blood ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. 3531-3540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo A. Cardoso ◽  
J. Pedro Veiga ◽  
Paolo Ghia ◽  
Hernani M. Afonso ◽  
W. Nicholas Haining ◽  
...  

We have previously shown that leukemia-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTL) can be generated from the bone marrow of most patients with B-cell precursor acute leukemias. If these antileukemia CTL are to be used for adoptive immunotherapy, they must have the capability to circulate, migrate through endothelium, home to the bone marrow, and, most importantly, lyse the leukemic cells in a leukemia-permissive bone marrow microenvironment. We demonstrate here that such antileukemia T-cell lines are overwhelmingly CD8+ and exhibit an activated phenotype. Using a transendothelial chemotaxis assay with human endothelial cells, we observed that these T cells can be recruited and transmigrate through vascular and bone marrow endothelium and that these transmigrated cells preserve their capacity to lyse leukemic cells. Additionally, these antileukemia T-cell lines are capable of adhering to autologous stromal cell layers. Finally, autologous antileukemia CTL specifically lyse leukemic cells even in the presence of autologous marrow stroma. Importantly, these antileukemia T-cell lines do not lyse autologous stromal cells. Thus, the capacity to generate anti–leukemia-specific T-cell lines coupled with the present findings that such cells can migrate, adhere, and function in the presence of the marrow microenvironment enable the development of clinical studies of adoptive transfer of antileukemia CTL for the treatment of ALL.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2956-2956
Author(s):  
Maria Monne ◽  
Giovanna Piras ◽  
Antonella Uras ◽  
Marco Murineddu ◽  
Angelo D. Palmas ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2956 Poster Board II-932 Background. The B-cell leukemia 11A gene (BCL11A/Evi9/CTIP1) is essential for normal lymphoid development and genetic association studies have shown its potential regulator effect in blood related phenotypes. BCL11A encodes a Krüppel-like zinc-finger protein and functions as a transcriptional repressor through its interaction with several proteins including BCL6. The corresponding mouse gene is a common site of retroviral integration in myeloid leukemia, and may function as a leukemia oncogene. It is down-regulated during hematopoietic cell differentiation and abnormalities involving this gene have been detected in a variety of B-cell malignancies in humans. We genotyped SNP rs11886868 in the BCL11A gene, which has been previously associated with HbF production, in patients with hematological malignancies from Sardinia to investigate a possible contribution of this gene in determining genetic susceptibility to onco-hematological diseases. Patients and Methods. We screened a total of 325 patients with hematological malignancies for rs11886868 SNP at the BCL11A locus using the TaqMan allelic discrimination assay: 51 B-cell Non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), 27 Hodgkin's disease (HD), 42 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), 52 Multiple Myeloma, 35 Cutaneous T-cell Lymphomas (CTCL), 11 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), 19 Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), 31 Acute Non Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ANLL), 36 Philadelphia negative Myeloproliferative Disorders (MPD), 21 Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. Fifty–four DNAs from healthy individuals were used as population controls. Both patients and controls originated from central Sardinia. The frequencies comparisons between controls and cases were performed using chi-square test and Odds Ratio (OR) analysis with Cornfield 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. Allele frequencies for BCL11A rs11886868 were 22% for the “C” allele and 78% for the “T” allele. No statistically significant difference was observed between cases and controls. All genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for both patients and controls groups. The genotype frequencies were 65% (T/T), 26% (C/T) and 9% (C/C) in controls and 53% (T/T), 40.5% (C/T), and 6.5% (C/C) in hematological malignancies. When compared with the genotype frequencies reported for Caucasian and healthy controls from Sardinia no statistically significant difference was observed (p=0.4). However, the C/T genotype was more frequent in cases than controls (41% vs 26%) conferring an increased risk for hematological malignancies with an estimated OR=1,9 (95%CI 1.08-3.6; p=0.03). In detail, statistically significant differences in genotype distribution were observed in CTCL (p< 0.0001), MPD (p=0.0006), NHL (p=0.008), HD (p=0.002) and ALL patients (p=0.02). The C/C genotype was not observed in CTCL and HD patients, while heterozygousity conferred an increased risk of 4.2 (2.3-7.7; p value <0.0001) and 2.6 (1.6-4.7; p value <0.002), respectively. The C/T genotype was also overrepresented in MPD with an estimated OR of 3.2 (1.7-5.8; p value= 0.0001) and NHL with OR of 2.7 (1.5-4.9; p value <0.001). Stratification for clinical and biological parameters showed that among CLLs, the C/C genotype was present in 4/27 (15%) of the CD38-negative patients and in none of the CD38-positive subgroup. By contrast, the homozygousity for the ancestral “T” allele was not observed in Mantle Cell and Marginal Zone Lymphomas. Conclusions. We found genetic association of BCL11A gene in several blood disorders with the strongest association for Cutaneous T-cell Lymphomas and Myeloproliferative disorders suggesting a possible role of BCL11A in both lymphoid and myeloid lineages. Specific BCL11A genotypes have been associated with different BCL11A expression levels that influence HbF production. We speculate that BCL11A sequence variants may influence expression of different isoforms that may have effect on cell pathways involved in oncogenetic events as well as in globin gene regulation. This work was supported by Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie e Linfomi (AIL) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 380-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan A. Grupp ◽  
Shannon L Maude ◽  
Pamela Shaw ◽  
Richard Aplenc ◽  
David M. Barrett ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND CARs combine a single chain variable fragment (scFv) of an antibody with intracellular signaling domains. We have previously reported on CTL019 cells expressing an anti-CD19 CAR. Infusion of these cells results in 100 to 100,000x in vivo proliferation, durable anti-tumor activity, and prolonged persistence in pts with B cell tumors, including sustained CRs in adults and children with ALL (Grupp et al., NEJM 2013, Maude et al., NEJM 2014). We now report on outcomes and longer follow up of the first 30 pts with relapsed, refractory ALL treated on our pilot trial in pediatric ALL. METHODS T cells were lentivirally transduced with a CAR composed of anti-CD19 scFv/4-1BB/CD3ζ, activated/expanded ex-vivo with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads, and then infused into children with relapsed or refractory CD19+ ALL. 26/30 pts received lymphodepleting chemotherapy the week prior to CTL019 infusion. The targeted T cell dose range was 107 to 108 cells/kg with a transduction efficiency of 11-45%. T cells for manufacturing were collected from the pt regardless of prior SCT status, not allo donors. RESULTS 30 children median age 10y (5-22y) with CD19+ ALL were treated. 25/30 pts had detectable disease on the day before CTL019 cell infusion, while 5 were MRD(-). A median of 3.6x106 CTL019 cells/kg (1.1-18x106/kg) were infused over 1-3 days. There were no infusional toxicities >grade 2, although 9 pts developed fevers within 24 hrs of infusion and did not receive a planned 2nd infusion of CTL019 cells. 27 pts (90%) achieved a CR, including a patient with T cell ALL aberrantly expressing CD19+. 3 did not respond. MRD measured by clinical flow cytometry was negative in 23 responding pts and positive at 0.1% (negative at 3 mo), 0.09%, 0.22%, and 1.1% in 4 pts. With median follow up 8 mo (1-26 mo), 16 pts have ongoing CR, with only 3 patients in the cohort receiving subsequent treatment such as donor lymphocyte infusion or SCT, 6-month EFS measured from infusion is 63% (95% CI, 47-84%), and OS is 78% (95% CI, 63-95%). CTL019 cells were detected in the CSF of 17/19 pts and 2 pts with CNS2a disease experienced a CR in CSF. 10 pts with a CR at 1 mo have subsequently relapsed, half with CD19(-) blasts. 2/5 pts who relapsed with CD19(-) disease had previously been refractory to CD19-directed blinatumomab and subsequently went into CR with CTL019. Figure 1 Figure 1. All responding pts developed grade 1-4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) at peak T cell expansion. Detailed cytokine analysis showed marked increases of IL6 and IFNγ (both up to 1000x), and IL2R. Treatment for CRS was required for hemodynamic or respiratory instability in 37% of patients and was rapidly reversed in all cases with the IL6-receptor antagonist tocilizumab, together with corticosteroids in 5 pts. Although T cells collected from the 21 pts who had relapsed after allo SCT were median 100% donor origin, no GVHD has been seen. Grade 4 CRS was strongly associated with high disease burden prior to infusion and with elevations in IL-6, ferritin (suggesting macrophage activation syndrome) and C reactive protein after infusion. Persistence of CTL019 cells detected by flow cytometry and/or QPCR, and accompanied by B cell aplasia, continued for 1-26 months after infusion in pts with ongoing responses. QPCR showed very high levels of CTL019 proliferation, with all patients achieving peak levels >5000 copies/ug gDNA and 26 patients with peak levels >15,000 copies/ug gDNA. B cell aplasia has been treated with IVIg without significant infectious complications. Probability of 6-mo CTL019 persistence by flow was68% (95% CI, 50-92%) andrelapse-free B cell aplasia was 73% (95% CI, 57-94%). CONCLUSIONS: CTL019 cells can undergo robust in-vivo expansion and can persist for 2 years or longer in pts with relapsed ALL, allowing for the possibility of long-term disease response without subsequent therapy such as SCT. This approach also has promise as a salvage therapy for patients who relapse after allo-SCT with a low risk of GVHD. CTL019 therapy is associated with a significant CRS that responds rapidly to IL-6-targeted anti-cytokine treatment. CTL019 cells can induce potent and durable responses for patients with relapsed/refractory ALL; however, recurrence with cells that have lost CD19 is an important mechanism of CLT019 resistance. CTL019 therapy has received Breakthrough Therapy designation from the FDA in both pediatric and adult ALL, and phase II multicenter trials have been initiated. Disclosures Grupp: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Barrett:Novartis: Research Funding. Chew:Novartis: Research Funding. Lacey:Novartis: Research Funding. Levine:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Melenhorst:Novartis: Research Funding. Rheingold:Novartis: Consultancy. Shen:Novartis: Employment. Wood:Novartis Pharma: Employment. Porter:Novartis: managed according to U Penn Policy Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. June:Novartis: Research Funding, Royalty income Patents & Royalties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document