Real-Life Data on the Outcome of Daratumomab-Refractory Myeloma Patients: Multi-Center Experience

Abstract Introduction: The survival of double refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients was poor in the pre- monoclonal antibody era, with a median overall survival (OS) of 9 months only. Daratumumab used as a single agent has shown significant efficacy resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 30%, and OS of 20 months in patients, failing immunomodulatory drugs (IMIDs) and proteosome inhibitors (PIs). Daratumumab combined with pomalidomide and dexamethasone has yielded ORR of 60% and median OS of 17.5 months in such patients. Daratumumab has been recently introduced to the early relapsed MM setting, providing significant improvement in progression-free survival when administered in combination with IMIDs or PIs. The current retrospective study has evaluated the characteristics and outcome of MM patients who had progressed while being receiving daratumumab, aiming to define prognostic factors and optimal therapeutic approaches for this patient population. Methods: MM patients treated with daratumumab alone or in combinations in 11 Israeli centers between 01.2014 and 07.2018, all experiencing disease relapse/progression were included. Data including demographics, disease-related parameters at diagnosis [MM type, extramedullary disease (EMD), ISS (International Scoring System), LDH level high-risk cytogenetics], prior treatment regimens, response duration to the last pre-daratumumab therapy, treatment and outcomes post-daratumumab failure were analyzed. Results: One hundred consecutive patients progressing on daratumumab were included in the study. Patient characteristics are presented in table 1. Daratumumab was used in 2nd-3rd line therapy in 17 patients (17%), 4th in 22 patients (22%) and 5th-9th line therapy in 61 patients (61%). Sixty four patients (64%) were refractory to at least 3 novel agents before starting a daratumumab combination; 36 (36%) of them were quadrate refractory to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and pomalidomide. Forty five patients (45%) received daratumumab as a single agent and 55 (55%) as a combination therapy (table 1). Median duration of response to the last pre-daratumumab therapy was 5 months, with duration of ³6 months predicting response to daratumumab (P=0.019). Fifty seven percent of patients achieved stable disease or better with daratumumab combinations, with an ORR of 38% [partial response (PR) or better] and 15% achieved very good PR (VGPR) or complete response. Median time to progression on daratumumab was 3.1 months. It was shorter in patients treated with daratumumab as a single agent than in those receiving a combination therapy (2.5 vs 4.7 months, p=0.012). Progression (n=13) or de novo (n=19) EMD was recorded in 32 patients (32%). At time of relapse/progression, daratumumab was stopped in 45 patients (45%), and continued in combination with other agents in 33 patients (33%). Data regarding actions taken post-daratumumab failure were unavailable for 22 individuals. In 58 patients, for whom data regarding response to a post-daratumumab regimen were available, the ORR was 34%. Median follow-up after daratumumab failure was 8 months (0 -33.5 months), with a median OS of 5.3 months; 25% of the patients survived <2.2 months and another 25% - >14.1 months. Notably, daratumumab given in combination with chemotherapy was associated with a worse prognosis (HR=2.7, P=0.007). No OS difference was found between those who stopped daratumumab at time of failure and those who continued it. Age, gender, high-risk cytogenetics and lines of previous therapies did not affect OS in this patient group. Longer duration of response to both pre-daratumumab and daratumumab therapy was found to be associated with a prolonged OS after daratumumab failure (HR=0.929, P=0.006 and HR=0.872, P=0.024, respectively). Conclusions: The prognosis of double refractory MM patients, failing daratumumab therapy, is poor, with a median OS of 5.3 months. Post-failure continuation of daratumumab in a different anti-myeloma combination has not improved OS. Durable responses to both pre-daratumumab and daratumumab therapy are both associated with a superior OS in patients progressing on daratumumab, most probably reflecting a more favorable disease biology. Given that most patients in this study have been heavily pretreated, further evaluation of treatment strategies in patients who fail daratumumab combinations at earlier disease stages is warranted. Disclosures Cohen: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tadmor:ABBVIE: Consultancy; JNJ: Consultancy; NOVARTIS: Consultancy; PFIEZER: Consultancy; ROCHE: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of a Combination of 5-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide in High-Risk MDS or AML Patients with Del(5q) Cytogenetic Abnormalities – Results of the “AZALE” Trial,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3799.3799 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3799-3799 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Uwe Platzbecker ◽

Christina Ganster ◽

Jürgen Neesen ◽

Andrea Kuendgen ◽

Katharina Götze ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dna Methyltransferase ◽

De Novo ◽

Single Agent ◽

High Risk Patient ◽

P53 Mutations ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities

Abstract Abstract 3799 Lenalidomide (LEN) has shown single agent activity in patients (pts) with low-risk MDS and a del(5q) cytogenetic abnormality although mutations of p53 have been recently associated with treatment failure. Further, the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine (AZA) is able to achieve responses in up to 50% of high-risk MDS (IPSS INT-2 or HIGH) and AML pts with a low rate of extramedullary toxicity compared to conventional induction chemotherapy (IC). Nevertheless, del(5q) abnormalities especially when part of a complex aberrant karyotype are associated with lower response rates compared to other cytogenetic aberrations. Therefore, studies combining both compounds are of interest in this population. We report results of a phase I clinical trial within the German MDS study group (GMDS-SG) evaluating the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of LEN in combination with AZA in pts with either high-risk MDS, refractory/relapsed AML or de novo AML not eligible for conventional IC with del(5q) cytogenetic abnormalities. Given the mechanism of action of both drugs a sequential approach was chosen. To determine the MTD, a standard “3+3” design was used. In fact, induction therapy consisted of AZA (75mg/m2 days 1–5) followed by increasing doses (10, 15, 20 and 25mg) of LEN (starting with 10mg p.o., days 6–19). In pts achieving a complete remission (CR) this was followed by a combined maintenance therapy every 8 weeks until disease progression. Of 20 pts enrolled, median age was 69 years (range, 45 to 79 years), interval from MDS or AML diagnosis was 8 months (range, 1 to 100 months). IPSS categories were INT-2 (n = 5) or HIGH (n = 9) whereas 6 pts were included with advanced AML. Prior therapies included IC only (n=1), allogeneic HSCT (n=3), AZA (n=6), LEN (n=2) and/or low-dose cytarabine (n=2) while 10 pts had received supportive care only prior to study entry. It is of note, that the majority of pts (n=15, 75%) had a complex aberrant karyotype including a del(5q) abnormality. Further, p53 mutations could be detected in 7 (47%) out of 15 pts analyzed so far. A median of 2 induction cycles were administered within the 4 dose cohorts. The MTD of LEN was determined to be 20mg. DLTs were either infectious complications (n=2), thrombosis (n=1) or incomplete hematologic recovery (n=1). In fact, therapy-induced grade 3–4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurred in 12 (60%) pts, respectively. Out of the 19 pts evaluable for response 6 pts (32%) achieved a hematologic (CR: n=2, CRi: n=2, PR: n=1, HI: n=1) and 7 pts (36%) a cytogenetic (CR: n=3, PR: n=4) response while 13 pts (68%) had stable disease. Interestingly, 5 out of 7 pts with p53 mutations responded to combination therapy. The combination of AZA and LEN is feasible and seems to be effective even in a very high risk patient group with advanced MDS or AML and a del(5q). Disclosures: Platzbecker: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kuendgen:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Götze:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giagounidis:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hofmann:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Germing:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Haase:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Improved Clinical Outcome of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Progressing after Hypomethylating Agent: In the Era of Novel Therapies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150626 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3688-3688

Author(s):

Ahmad Ghorab ◽

Aref Al-Kali ◽

Michelle A. Elliot ◽

Mithun V. Shah ◽

Jeanne M. Palmer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Clinical Outcome ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Novel Therapies ◽

High Risk Patients ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Very High

Abstract Introduction: Historically, clinical outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), progressing on hypomethylating agents (HMA; azacitidine or decitabine) has been dismal with median overall survival (OS) of less than 6 months (Jabbour et al. Cancer 2010). With recent approval of venetoclax based combinations for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and CPX-351 for AML with MDS related changes (primary or secondary), clinical outcome has improved in sub-set of high-risk patients compared to historical cohorts. Hence, we analyzed clinical outcome of MDS patients progressing on HMA, in the current era of novel therapies. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcome of 43 MDS patients who progressed on HMA-based therapy and treated at the Mayo Clinic between February 2015 and February 2021. We describe clinical characteristics of these patients, therapies received after progressing on HMA-based therapy, duration of response attained after 1st line therapy post HMA-based therapy and OS from time of HMA failure till death or last follow up. We also performed Cox regression multivariate analysis for OS after progression on HMA-based therapy. Results: Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1.The median age of the patients were 69 years (range [R], 48-93). R-IPSS score in this cohort of patients was very low (2[5%]), low (5[12%]), intermediate (5 [12%]), high (11[26%]) and very high (20 [46.5%]). Forty-nine percent of patients had complex cytogenetics. Most commonly occurring mutations (≥ 5%) were TP53 (42%), splicing mutation (SRSF2/SF3B1/ or U2AF1) (16%), ASXL1 (12%), RUNX1 (7%), DNMT3A (5%) and IDH1/ or IDH2 (5%). The HMA-based therapy patients received were azacitidine (40%), decitabine (30%) and HMA plus venetoclax (30%). The median time to progression from time of initiation of HMA-based therapy was 5 months (R= 1-30). Sixty-three percent (n= 27) of patients progressed to AML after HMA-based therapy. The most common 1 st line therapies post HMA was venetoclax-based (12 [28%]), CPX-351 (12 [28%]), and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) (4 [9%]). Fifteen (45.5%) patients achieved CR/CRi, 17 (51.5%) patients progressed and 1 (3%) patient had stable disease. The percentage of patients received venetoclax with HMA, 1 st and 2 nd line therapy post HMA were 26%, 28% and 10%, respectively. Overall, 11 (25%) patients received SCT in this cohort of patients. The median duration of response after 1 st line therapy post HMA was not reached (NR; 66% progression free at 1 year) (Figure 1A). The median OS after HMA failure was 12.7 months (95% CI: 3.1-22.2) (Figure 1B). In the univariate analysis for OS after HMA failure, SCT at any time point (p = 0.01) and achieving CR/CRi after 1 st line therapy post HMA (p= <0.001) showed favorable significance for OS. Whereas, R-IPSS high/very high (p= 0.35), treatment with CPX-351 on AML progression (p=0.33), venetoclax-based therapy (p= 0.59) did not show statistical significance. Subsequently, in multivariate analysis, only achievement of CR/CRi after 1 st line therapy post HMA retained significance for favorable OS (HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04-0.86, p= 0.03). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report analyzing outcome of MDS patients progressing on HMA in the recent era. Acknowledging the limitations of retrospective analysis, our report suggests improved outcome of these high-risk patients compared to historical data. Utilizing venetoclax plus HMA combination earlier in patients with high-risk MDS as being evaluated in VERONA trial and consolidation therapy with SCT in eligible patients have potential to improve long term outcome of this group of high-risk patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Al-Kali: Astex: Other: Research support to institution; Novartis: Research Funding. Palmer: PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Protagonist: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding. Murthy: CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding. Litzow: Pluristem: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Omeros: Other: Advisory Board; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee. Foran: pfizer: Honoraria; takeda: Research Funding; trillium: Research Funding; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; syros: Honoraria; sanofi aventis: Honoraria; revolution medicine: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; bms: Honoraria; certara: Honoraria; abbvie: Research Funding; OncLive: Honoraria; gamida: Honoraria; taiho: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; aptose: Research Funding; actinium: Research Funding; kura: Research Funding; h3bioscience: Research Funding; aprea: Research Funding; sellas: Research Funding; stemline: Research Funding. Badar: Pfizer Hematology-Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Determinants of Choice of Front-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for Chronic Phase CML: A Study from the "Registro Italiano LMC & Campus CML"

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-135972 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 35-36

Author(s):

Mario Tiribelli ◽

Roberto Latagliata ◽

Massimo Breccia ◽

Isabella Capodanno ◽

Maria Cristina Miggiano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Front Line ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Concomitant Medications

Introduction : therapy of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in virtually all patients. Three TKIs are approved for first-line therapy in Italy: imatinib and two second-generation (2G) TKIs, dasatinib and nilotinib. Choice of the front-line TKI is based on a combined evaluation of patient's and disease characteristics, age, risk, comorbidities and concomitant medications. Treating physician's preference and, in some cases, economic considerations, particularly after the advent of generic imatinib, may play a role in TKI selection. However, to date, few data are available on TKI use in a whole nation and on the possible drivers of treatment choice. Aim of the present work was to analyse the use of front-line TKI therapy in a large, unselected cohort of Italian CP-CML patients, correlating patient's features to drug choice. Methods: in the framework of the national Campus CML program, we retrospectively evaluated 1422 patients with CP-CML diagnosed from 2012 and 2019 in 21 haematologic Centres, mostly in academic and/or tertiary hospitals, widespread through the entire Italian territory and treated frontline with imatinib, dasatinib or nilotinib. Results: median age at diagnosis was 59.9 years [interquartile range (IQR) 47.1 - 71.7], with 317 (22.3%) patients under 45 years, 552 (38.8%) between 45 and 65 years and 553 (38.9%) older than 65 years; 821 (57.7%) patients were males. Among 1364 evaluable patients, CML risk according to Sokal score was low in 540 (39.6%), intermediate in 610 (44.7%) and high in 214 (15.7%) patients respectively; the number at low, intermediate or high risk according to the novel ELTS score among 1325 evaluable patients was 759 (57.3%), 402 (30.3%) and 164 (12.4%) respectively. Considering comorbidities, 1003 (70.6%) patients had at least one active disease at the time of CML diagnosis, the most common being hypertension (n=547, 38.5%), previous neoplasms (n=185, 13.0%), diabetes (n=150, 10.6%), chronic bronchopulmonary diseases (n=114, 8.0%), acute myocardial infarction (n=95, 6.7%), previous stroke (n=36, 2.5%) and other vascular diseases (n=98, 6.9%). Among 1335 evaluable patients, 813 (60.9%) were taking at least one concomitant medication, with 280 (21.0%) taking 3-5 drugs and 140 (10.5%) taking 6+ drugs at time of TKI start. As to the frontline therapy, 794 (55.8%) received imatinib and 628 (44.2%) were treated with 2G-TKIs, (226 dasatinib and 402 nilotinib) respectively. According to age, 2G-TKIs were chosen for majority of patients aged <45 (69.1%) while imatinib was used in 76.9% of patients over 65 (p<0.001). There was a predominance of imatinib use across all Sokal (51.1% in low, 61.3% in intermediate and 51.4% in high) and ELTS (50.3% in low, 60.4% in intermediate and 66.5%) risk categories. We observed a prevalent use of 2G-TKIs in patients presenting with higher WBC counts (55.1% if WBC >100,000/mm3 vs 38.2% if WBC <100,000/mm3; p<0.001), lower Hb (53.8% if Hb <10 g/dl vs 41.9 if Hb >10 g/dl; p=0.001) and bigger spleen (65.1% if spleen >5 cm vs 44.8% if spleen 1-5 cm vs 37.3% if spleen not palpable; p<0.001). There was a decreasing use of 2G-TKIs with higher number of concomitant drugs: 64.4% for 0, 47.7% for 1-2, 27.0% for 3-5 and 13.6% for >5 drugs, respectively (p<0.001). Concordantly, there was a significant higher use of imatinib in patients with hypertension (69.8%), diabetes (70.0%), COPD (73.7%), previous neoplasms (73.0%), AMI (86.3%) or stroke (97.2%) history (p<0.001 for all conditions). Lastly, we observed a wider use of imatinib (61.1%) in patients diagnosed in years 2018-19, compared to those of the period 2012-17 (53.7%; p=0.01). In multivariable analysis, factors correlated with imatinib use were age > 45 years, intermediate or high Sokal risk, presence of some comorbidities (2nd neoplasia and stroke) and number of concomitant medications. Conclusions: preliminary results of this observational study on almost 1500 patients show that around 55% of newly diagnosed Italian CP-CML patients receive imatinib as front-line therapy, and that the use of 2G-TKI is prevalent in the younger patients and in those with no concomitant clinical conditions. The counterintuitive finding of imatinib prevalence as frontline treatment in high risk patients might be explained by the older age of these patients. Introduction of the generic formulation in 2018 seems to have fostered the use of imatinib. Figure Disclosures Breccia: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cavazzini:Pfize: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Saglio:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine (BST-236) as a single-agent, first-line therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia unfit for standard chemotherapy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.7007 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 7007-7007

Author(s):

Jessica K. Altman ◽

Jamie Koprivnikar ◽

James K. McCloskey ◽

Vamsi Kota ◽

Olga Frankfurt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

De Novo ◽

Single Agent ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

First Line ◽

Standard Chemotherapy ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

De Novo Aml

7007 Background: Aspacytarabine (BST-236) is a prodrug of cytarabine, the backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) standard of care chemotherapy, associated with toxicity which precludes its administration in older patients and patients with comorbidities. Aspacytarabine is inactive in its intact prodrug form until cytarabine is gradually released at pharmacokinetics which decrease the systemic exposure to peak toxic cytarabine levels, resulting in reduced systemic toxicity and relative sparing of normal tissues, enabling therapy with high cytarabine doses to patients otherwise unfit to receive it. Methods: A phase 2b open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a first-line single-agent therapy in newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard chemotherapy (NCT03435848). Aspacytarabine is administrated at 4.5 g/m2/d (containing 3 g/m2/d cytarabine) in 1-2 induction and 1-3 consolidation courses, each consisting of 6 daily 1-hour infusions. Patients with secondary AML, prior hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy, and therapy-related AML, are eligible. Results: To date, in the ongoing study, 46 newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard chemotherapy (median age 75 years) were treated with aspacytarabine and completed 1-4 courses of 4.5 g/m2/d aspacytarabine, including 26 patients (63%) with de novo AML and 17 (37%) with secondary AML. Six patients (13%) were previously treated with HMA (median 12 courses). The baseline median bone marrow blasts was 52%, and 54% and 29% of patients had adverse or intermediate European LeukemiaNet (ELN) score, respectively. Twenty (43%) patients had ECOG 2. Aspacytarabine is safe and well-tolerated in repeated-course administration. Grade > 2 drug-related adverse events include mainly hematological events and infections. The 30-day mortality rate is 11%. Of 43 patients evaluable for efficacy analysis to date, 15 patients (35%) reached a complete remission (CR) following 1 (13 patients) or 2 (2 patients) induction courses, all with complete hematological recovery (median 27.5 days, range 22-39 days). The CR rates in de novo AML patients and patients with adverse ELN score are 46% and 33%, respectively. Of the 11 patients evaluable to date for minimal residual disease (MRD) flow cytometry test, 8 are MRD negative (73%). While aspacytarabine treatment consists of a limited number of courses, median duration of response and median overall survival for responders are not reached at 12 and 24 months, respectively (end of follow up). Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The cumulative clinical data suggest that aspacytarabine, a time-limited single-agent treatment, is safe and efficacious as a first-line therapy for patients who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy, which may establish it as a new tolerable AML chemotherapy backbone. Clinical trial information: NCT03435848.

Download Full-text

Patterns of treatment and outcome with 500-mg fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-life multicenter Italian experience

Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology ◽

10.1177/1758835919833864 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

pp. 175883591983386 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Raffaella Palumbo ◽

Federico Sottotetti ◽

Erica Quaquarini ◽

Anna Gambaro ◽

Antonella Ferzi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Liver Metastasis ◽

Hormone Receptor ◽

De Novo ◽

Large Population ◽

Single Agent ◽

Real Life ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Hormone Receptor Positive

Background: Fulvestrant 500 mg (F500) is the most active endocrine single agent in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Few data are available regarding the effectiveness of the drug in a real-world setting. Patients and methods: This prospective, multicenter cohort study aimed to describe the patterns of treatment and performance of F500 in a large population of unselected women with MBC, focusing on potential prognostic or predictive factors for disease outcome and response. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical benefit rate. Results: From January 2011 to December 2015, 490 consecutive patients treated with F500 were enrolled. Overall, three different cohorts were identified and analyzed: the first received F500 after progression from previous chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy; the second received the drug for de novo metastatic disease; and the third was treated as maintenance following disease stabilization or a response from a previous CT line. Median overall survival (OS) in the whole population was 26.8 months, ranging from 32.4 in first line to 22.0 and 13.7 months in second line and subsequent lines, respectively. Both the presence of liver metastasis and the treatment line were significantly associated with a worse PFS, while only the presence of liver metastasis maintained its predictive role for OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: The effectiveness of F500 was detected in patients treated both upon disease progression and as maintenance. The relevant endocrine sensitivity of 80% of patients included in the study could probably explain the good results observed in terms of outcome.

Download Full-text

A Retrospective Comparison of Matched Elderly Patients Treated with Laromustine (Cloretazine®) or Best Supportive Care or Low Dose Ara-C in the LRF AML14 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.2960.2960 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 2960-2960 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Robert Hills ◽

Susan O’Brien ◽

Verena Karsten ◽

Alan K. Burnett ◽

Francis Giles

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Supportive Care ◽

Low Dose ◽

De Novo ◽

Performance Status ◽

Single Agent ◽

Best Supportive Care ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Retrospective Comparison ◽

De Novo Aml

Abstract Background : A substantial proportion of older patients with AML are considered unlikely to benefit from an intensive treatment approach. They often receive either best supportive care (BSC), low dose treatment such as Low Dose Ara-C (LDAC), or clinical trials of novel agents. In one of the few randomised studies where patients were prospectively considered likely to be unfit for intensive therapy, LDAC was superior to BSC with 18% v 1% patients achieving CR. No patients with high risk cytogenetics (Grimwade 1998), achieved CR (Burnett 2007). Laromustine (Cloretazine®) is a novel sulfonylhydrazine alkylating agent which preferentially targets the O6 position of guanine resulting in DNA cross-links. Laromustine has previously shown clinical activity in patients with de novo AML and high risk MDS (Giles et al. JCO 2007). A confirmatory phase II study of single agent laromustine was conducted in previously untreated patients ≥ 60 years old with de novo AML, prospectively considered likely to be unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Patients had at least one poor risk factor, defined by age ≥70, performance status 2, unfavorable cytogenetics, or cardiac, pulmonary or hepatic dysfunction. Eighty-five patients received induction therapy with 600 mg/m2 laromustine. Second induction cycles were administered in 14 patients after partial response or hematologic improvement. Eighteen patients received at least one consolidation cycle of cytarabine 400 mg/m2/day CIV for 5 days. Methods: A retrospective non-randomised comparison was performed between the 85 patients treated with laromustine, and 121 patients satisfying the same entry criteria, treated in the AML 14 trial with either BSC or LDAC. Outcomes were compared using Mantel-Haenszel and logrank methods for unadjusted comparisons, and regression methods for adjusted analyses. Results : Patients in AML14 were slightly older than those treated with laromustine (median age 75 v 73), and tended to have higher white blood cell counts; by contrast, there were significantly fewer cardiac or respiratory comorbidities reported in the AML14 population. Other important risk factors such as performance status and cytogenetics were similar between the groups. Responses overall (CR/CRp) were seen in 33% (28/85) of patients treated with laromustine, compared with 2% (1/60) and 23% (14/61) in patients treated with BSC and LDAC (p<0.0001, p=0.2, respectively). In particular, 1 patient with −5/del(5q), and 3 patients with −7/del(7q) cytogenetics experienced a CR with laromustine; patients in AML 14 with adverse cytogenetics saw no remissions. Survival was significantly improved in the laromustine group compared to BSC (1 year survival 20% v 8%, unadjusted HR 0.58 [0.40–0.84] p=0.004), and roughly comparable to that of LDAC (1 year survival 20% v 25%, HR 1.04 [0.73–1.49] p=0.8). Analyses adjusted for differences in baseline demographics, and using propensity scores gave consistent figures. Conclusions: Retrospective comparison of unrandomised data has significant limitations even though care has been taken to match for factors known to be predictive for survival. Laromustine was able to achieve a higher CR rate than LDAC or BSC, and produced remissions in groups where no remissions have previously been seen with LDAC or BSC. Laromustine gave significantly better survival than BSC, and demonstrated similar survival to LDAC.

Download Full-text

Combination Therapy with Entinostat (MS-275) and GM-CSF to Enhance Differentiation In Myeloid Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3312.3312 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3312-3312 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Cho Eunpi ◽

William Matsui ◽

Jeanne Kowalski ◽

Hua-Ling Tsai ◽

Richard J. Jones ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Allogeneic Bone ◽

Differentiation Potential ◽

Appreciable Change ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Gm Csf

Abstract Abstract 3312 Background: Histone actylases (HAC and histone deacetylases (HDAC) are two important enzymes in epigenetic control that can affect transcription of important regulatory transcription factors. Entinostat is a HDAC inhibitor that has been shown in vivo and in vitro to have anti-proliferative effects on many cancer cell types (Abujamra Leukemia Res 2009). When administered at low concentration to leukemic cell lines, entinostat induced p21-mediated growth arrest and expression of differentiation markers; higher concentrations led to marked increase in reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial damage, caspase activation and apoptosis (Rosato Cancer Res 2003). A Phase I study using entinostat as a single agent in relapsed and refractory leukemia showed in vivo differentiation potential with several patients showing significant increases in their mature granulocyte population and increased acetylation of the CD34+ blast population (Gojo Blood 2006). GM-CSF has been shown to enhance the differentiation potential of various agents such as interferon-alpha, all-trans-retinoic acid, bryostatin, and numerous other anti-neoplastic agents. The effects of combination therapy with GM-CSF and entinostat in patients with high-risk MDS or refractory and/or relapsed AML are presented here. Methods: A Phase II study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with GM-CSF and entinostat in patients with high-risk MDS and relapsed or refractory AML who are not eligible for allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT). The combination of entinostat and GM-CSF was administered in 6-week (42 day) cycles for at least 2 cycles. Entinostat was originally give at 8 mg/m2 weekly but was eventually adjusted to 4 mg/m2 weekly for the first 4 out of 6 weeks due to toxicity. GM-CSF was given at a single dose of 125 micrograms/m2/day for days 1–35 in the cycles 1, 2, 4 and 6 and days 1–42 in cycles 3 and 5. Patients who tolerated two cycles of 4 mg/m2 were assessed for response through measurements of peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirate and biopsies. Transfusion requirements and adverse events (AE) were recorded on all subjects throughout the study period. Clinical responses for AML and MDS were measured according to International Working Group definitions of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), hematologic improvement, and progressive disease (PD). Results: A total of 24 patients met the eligibility criteria for response assessment. Median age was 71 (range 52–84) years and 15 (63%) were male. Of the 19 patients with AML, 8 had relapsed/refractory disease, 7 had AML arising from MDS, 3 had therapy-related AML, and 1 had de novo AML. The remaining 5 patients had a primary diagnosis of MDS. 10 patients (42%) completed 2 or more cycles at the 4 or 6 mg/m2 dose of MS-275. These patients completed a total of 33 cycles, 1 resulting in CR, 4 in PR, 24 in SD, and 4 in PD. In addition to these standard endpoints, improvements were also noted in peripheral neutrophil counts (p<0.019) and platelet counts (p<0.001), without an appreciable change in blast count as a result of treatment (p<0.50). These results were achieved with few toxicities at the noted dosing. A total of 38 cycles at the 4-mg/m2-dose were analyzed for Grade 3 or 4 toxicities, which included febrile neutropenia (n=3), neutropenic infection (n=3), bone pain (n=2), fatigue (n=1), pericardial effusion (n=1), and weakness (n=1). Conclusion: Although treatment with entinostat and GM-CSF did not result in durable remissions, there were notable improvements in absolute neutrophil and platelet counts without negatively impacting the blast percentage. These findings suggests that therapy with entinostat and GM-CSF differentially promotes growth of mature myeloid cells and appears associated with better marrow function by minimizing the need for platelet transfusions. Such strategies may be most effective when applied to patients with low disease burdens or as maintenance therapy for patients with high risk disease in remission. Disclosures: Matsui: Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Infinity Phamaceuticals: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Geron Corporation: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Ibrutinib In Combination With Rituximab (iR) Is Well Tolerated and Induces a High Rate Of Durable Remissions In Patients With High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): New, Updated Results Of a Phase II Trial In 40 Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.675.675 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 675-675 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Jan A. Burger ◽

Michael J. Keating ◽

William G. Wierda ◽

Julia Hoellenriegel ◽

Ghayathri Jeyakumar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Subdural Hematoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Tp53 Mutation ◽

Single Agent ◽

Infectious Complications ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

High Rate ◽

Grade 3

Abstract The Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib is a promising new targeted therapy for patients with mature B cell malignancies, especially CLL and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Single agent ibrutinib induces an overall response rate (ORR) of 71% in relapsed CLL, based on the Phase 1/2 experience. To accelerate and improve responses to ibrutinib in high-risk CLL, ibrutinib was combined with rituximab; we update this Phase 2 single-center clinical trial with a median follow-up of 14 months. Methods Patients were treated with ibrutinib 420 mg PO daily continuously throughout the study Rituximab (375 mg/m2) was administered weekly for the first four weeks (cycle 1), then monthly until cycle 6.at which point patients continued on ibrutinib monotherapy. Study inclusion required high-risk disease (del17p or TP53 mutation [treated or untreated]), PFS < 36 months after frontline chemo-immunotherapy, or relapsed CLL with del11q. Results Characteristics of the 40 patients enrolled included median age of 65 (range 35–82) with a median of 2 prior therapies. There were14 female and 26 male patients. 20 patients had del17p or TP53 mutation (4 without prior therapy), and 13 patients had del11q. 32 patients had unmutated IGHV, only one patient mutated IGHV, the remaining patients had inconclusive IGHV results. The median β2 microglobulin was 4.2 mg/L (2.2 – 12.3), At a median follow up of 14 months, 32 of 40 patients continue on therapy (16 out of 20 with del17p or TP53 mutation) without disease progression. 39 patients were evaluable for response assessment per 2008 IWCLL guidelines; 34 (87%) achieved partial remission (PR), and three (8%) complete remission (CR), accounting for an ORR of 95%. One CR was negative for MRD by flow cytometry, The ORR in the 20 patients with del17p or TP53 mutation was 90% (16 PR, 2 CR). Among the 8 patients that came off study, 3 patient died from unrelated infectious complications (2 cases of sepsis, 1 case of pneumonia), and 1 died from unrelated respiratory and cardiovascular failure. Two patients came off study because of possibly ibrutinib-related toxicity (one subdural hematoma, one grade 3 mucositis), one patient had progressive disease, and one proceeded to stem cell transplantation. Treatment generally was well tolerated, with infectious complications (6 cases of pneumonia and 3 cases of upper respiratory infections) being the most common complication. There were two Grade 3, possibly related AEs: mucositis (n=1), and peripheral neuropathy (n=1). Milder toxicities included Grade 1-2 bruising (n=7), Grade 1 subdural hematoma (n=1), fatigue (n=2), bone pain, myalgias, and arthralgia (n=5), or diarrhea (n=1). Questionnaires revealed significantly improved overall health and quality of life (QOL) after 6 months, based on the EORTC-QOL-v.3 questionnaire, which coincided with a significant weight gain at 3 and 6 months. Conclusion Ibrutinib in combination with rituximab is a safe, well tolerated regimen for high-risk CLL patients, which induces high rates of durable responses. Responses were associated with significant improvements in QOL. Compared to ibrutinib monotherapy, the redistribution lymphocytosis resolves more rapidly and completely (see Figure), and consequently the ORR is higher. Whether the addition of rituximab to ibrutinib therapy translates into longer progression-free and overall survival will be addressed in an upcoming larger, randomized trial of ibrutinib versus iR in relapsed/refractory CLL. Disclosures: Burger: Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) for treatment of high-risk CLL patients. O'Brien:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Sequential Intensified Conditioning Regimen Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients with High-Risk AML in Complete Remission: A Survey from the ALWP of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3105.3105 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3105-3105

Author(s):

Florent Malard ◽

Myriam Labopin ◽

Gernot Stuhler ◽

Johanna Tischer ◽

Joerg Thomas Bittenbring ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multivariate Analysis ◽

High Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Antithymocyte Globulin ◽

De Novo ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Secondary Aml ◽

Off Label ◽

Advisory Boards ◽

De Novo Aml

Abstract Introduction. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is an established treatment modality that is potentially curative for many patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The development of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allows performing HCT in elderly and/or in heavily pretreated patients and in those with comorbidities precluding the use of standard myeloablative conditioning. Post-transplant relapse remains a challenge after RIC, particularly in patients with adverse prognosis factors.The so-called "sequential" transplant approach (e.g. FLAMSA regimen combining both intensive chemotherapy and RIC HCT within the same procedure) initially developed in patients with refractory AML, could be a promising strategy to improve disease control and decrease the risk of relapse in high-risk AML patients in complete remission (CR). Patients and methods. In the current study we analyzed transplantation outcomes in a cohort of 411 adults AML patients in CR at time of transplant, treated between 2002 and 2013. Patients received a "sequential" conditioning regimen based on Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d, high-dose aracytine 1-2 g/m2/d, amsacrine 100 mg/m2/d for 5 days and after a 3 days rest, total body irradiation (TBI) 4Gy, cyclophosphamide 50-120 mg/kg, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for 2 to 3 days (TBI group, n=269 [65%]). In 142 (35%) patients, TBI was substituted by IV Busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/d for 2 days, or orally equivalent dose (Bu group). 323 patients (79%) had de-novo AML and 88 (21%) had a secondary AML (with prior myelodysplastic syndrome). At time of transplant, 300 (73%) patients were in CR1 and 111 (27%) in CR2. Cytogenetic study in de novo AML was favorable in 19 patients (6%), intermediate in 102 (32%) and poor in 41 (13%). Cytogenetic data were missing in 161 (50%). 104 (25%) patients received matched related donors (MRD) and 307 (75%) unrelated donor (URD) HCT. Majority of patients (94%) received mobilized peripheral blood stem cells graft. Results. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 28 months and median age at transplant was 54 years (18-76). ANC>500/μL was achieved at a median of 17 (range, 9-74) days after HCT. Sixteen patients (4%) failed to engraft. Two year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 22% (95%CI, 18-26%) and 22% (95%CI, 18-27%), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 2 years were 59% (95%CI, 54-65%) and 56% (95%CI, 50-61%), respectively. Acute GVHD (grade II-IV) occurred in 109 (28%) patients. The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 31% (95%CI, 26-36), extensive in 17% (95%CI, 12-21). Two years RI, NRM, LFS and OS in TBI vs. Bu patients were 21.8% vs 21.7% (p=0.69), 29.4% vs 18.3% (p=0.008), 48.8% vs 59.6% (p=0.045) and 51.2% vs 64.0% (p=0.013), respectively. In multivariate analysis adjusted for variable with different distribution between Bu and TBI groups, the type of conditioning (TBI vs Bu) has no impact on RI, NRM, LFS and OS. Age over 55 at transplant was an independent adverse prognostic factor in multivariate analysis for NRM (hazard ratio (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.00-2.61, p=0.05)), LFS (HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.00-1.92, p=0.05) and OS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.11-2.18, p=0.01). Being treated in an experienced center (defined as having including 10 or more transplants in the study) was associated with a significant lower RI (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93, p=0.001) and better LFS (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98, p=0.01) and OS (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98, p=0.02). Finally, transplantation from an URD was associated with a significant increase in NRM (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.14-3.91, p=0.02). Of note, CR1 vs. CR2 and de novo vs. secondary AML had no impact on patients' outcome. Conclusions. These results in a rather large cohort of patients with AML suggest that a FLAMSA "sequential" regimen provided an efficient disease control in high-risk AML patients including in CR2 and secondary AML. Furthermore Busulfan and TBI based FLAMSA "sequential" regimens provide a similar outcome. These results should be confirmed in a multicenter well design randomized study. Disclosures Off Label Use: off-label drug use: antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for allo-SCT conditioning. Tischer:Sanofi-Aventis: Other: advisory board. Schmid:Neovii: Consultancy; Janssen Cilag: Other: Travel grand. Mayer:Janssen: Research Funding. Hallek:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; Boehringher Ingelheim: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase I/II Trial of Ixazomib (Ix), Pomalidomide (POM), and Dexamethasone (DEX), in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: Responses in Double/Triple Refractory Myeloma and Poor Risk Cytogenetics

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3316.3316 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3316-3316 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Amrita Krishnan ◽

Prashant Kapoor ◽

Joycelynne Palmer ◽

Ni-Chun Tsai ◽

Shaji Kumar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Phase I ◽

Research Funding ◽

Standard Dose ◽

Single Agent ◽

Median Number ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Refractory Disease ◽

Poor Risk

Abstract Triplet regimens combining an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), and a steroid are used to treat newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Although ixazomib (Ix), an oral PI with single agent activity, can be combined with lenalidomide (LEN), patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM are often LEN-refractory. Pomalidomide (POM) has single agent activity in LEN-refractory disease, and both POM and Ix also show activity in poor cytogenetic risk pts. Methods: Primary objectives: 1) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Ix in combination with standard dose POM and dexamethasone (DEX), and 2) evaluate the anti-tumor activity of the triplet. The treatment regimen included two dose levels (3 mg and 4 mg) of Ix on days 1, 8, 15; POM 4 mg days 1-21; and DEX 40 mg days 1, 8, 15, 22, of a 28 day cycle. Eligibility: R/R MM after >1 prior therapy, LEN-refractory, and ≤ grade(gr) 1 peripheral neuropathy (PN). Pts were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Design: Phase I study utilizing a standard 3+3 design; dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) defined during cycle 1. Results: 32 pts treated, 31 evaluable for toxicity and response. Pts received a median 4 cycles (range 1-13); median follow-up is 5.5 months (range 1.8-21.1). Six pts treated on DL1, 25 treated on DL2, the MTD/Phase II dose (P2D). Median age: 62 years (range 38-84); median time from diagnosis: 3.7 years (range 1.0-8.9); median number prior therapies: 3 (range 1-5); prior transplant: n = 23 (74%); double (LEN/Bortezomib[BOR]) or triple (LEN/BOR/Carfilzomib[CFZ]) refractory: 19 (61%). Phase I: DL1 expanded to n=6 after 1/3 pts experienced DLT (gr3 lung infection); no further DLT seen on DL 1 or 2. Adverse events (AEs) related to POM and/or Ix: ANC decrease Gr1/2 n=11 (35%), Gr3/4 n=10 (32%), platelet decrease Gr1/2 n=9 (29%), lymphocyte decrease Gr1/2 n=8 (26%), Gr3/4 n=11 (35%), PN Gr1/2 n=9 (29%), no Gr3/4. Response: Phase I and II, n=31 pts treated. ORR: 45% (6 VGPR, 8 PR); Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): 81% (6 VGPR, 8 PR, 3 MR, 8 SD). In the pts with high risk cytogenetics (7[23%] 1q, 3[10%] 17p, 2[6%] t(4;14)) an ORR of 58% (3 VGPR, 4 PR) was seen, and the CBR was 83%. In the double or triple refractory pts, an ORR of 26% and CBR of 79% (1 VGPR, 4 PR, 3 MR, 7 SD) were observed. Conclusions: Ix/POM/DEX is a well-tolerated oral combination therapy, and responses were seen even at DL1 and in high risk patients, including those with poor-risk cytogenetics or advanced refractory disease. Disclosures Kapoor: Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kumar:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lonial:Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Nathwani:Carevive Systems, Inc.: Research Funding. Forman:Mustang Therpapeutics: Other: Construct licensed by City of Hope. Berdeja:Abbvie, Acetylon, Amgen, Bluebird, BMS, Calithera, Celgene, Constellation, Curis, Epizyme, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kesios, Novartis, Onyx, Takeda, Tragara: Research Funding.

Download Full-text