scholarly journals TRANSCEND: Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (liso-cel; JCAR017) Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3545-3545 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lia Palomba ◽  
Jacob Garcia ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Christine Dehner ◽  
Karen C. Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Hospital Days

Abstract Background: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL is associated with high healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and cost (Danese 2017). Patients with R/R DLBCL have poor outcome with median OS <10 months (Van den Neste 2015). As transformative therapies are being developed for these patients, resource utilization may become an issue. Liso-cel is an investigational defined composition, CD19-directed 4-1BB CAR T cell product administered at a precise dose of CD8 and CD4 CAR T cells in a multicenter, seamless design Phase 1 pivotal trial of (R/R) DLBCL (TRANSCEND NHL 001; NCT02631044). In a recent analysis with 6 months follow-up, liso-cel treatment demonstrated a best overall response rate of 75% (55% CR) with low rates of severe cytokine release syndrome (1%) and neurologic events (13%) (Abramson 2018). The objective of this analysis is to characterize HRU, including site of care, associated with liso-cel in an interim analysis of the TRANSCEND pivotal trial. Methods: Eligible patients with R/R DLBCL, PMBCL, FL grade 3B, or MCL (≥18 years who received ≥2 lines of therapy) and adequate organ function (no minimum ALC requirement for apheresis) received lymphodepletion (LD) with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, followed by a single flat-dose infusion of liso-cel at one of two dose levels (DL1, 5 × 107 cells; DL2, 1 × 108 cells). Clinical site of care for liso-cel infusion was not protocol-defined. HRU was collected at all sites. Results: 94 patients (91 patients in the efficacy database and 3 patients from the safety database that were not in the electronic clinical as of data cut) were included in the preliminary site of care analysis. 86 patients received liso-cel in the inpatient setting and 8 patients in the outpatient setting. Mean (SD) number of hospital days was 15.6 (9.6) and 9.3 (11.9) among patients receiving inpatient and outpatient liso-cel infusion, respectively, reflecting a 40% lower duration in mean hospital days. The median time to hospitalization following outpatient infusion was 5 days (range: 4-22). No patients infused in the outpatient setting required subsequent ICU care or received corticosteroids, and only one received tocilizumab for cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Of all treated patients in the efficacy database (n=91), 12% (11/91) of patients required ICU care for management of toxicity, including 10% (9/91) for CRS or neurotoxicity and 3% (3/91) for management of acute respiratory events. Rates of hemofiltration and ventilation for patients in this cohort were 2% (2/91) and 7% (6/91), respectively. Outcomes based on site of administration will be presented (based on longer follow-up). Conclusions: CAR T cell therapy represents an additional treatment option for patients with R/R DLBCL. Liso-cel has been infused in both the inpatient and outpatient setting. Outpatient infusion was associated with 40% lower mean hospital days compared with infusions administered in the inpatient setting. As enrollment is ongoing, updated data will be reported. Disclosures Palomba: Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Garcia:Juno Therapeutics, a fully owned subsidiary of Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Juno Therapeutics, a fully owned subsidiary of Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dehner:Juno Therapeutics, a fully owned subsidiary of Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chung:Juno Therapeutics, a fully owned subsidiary of Celgene: Employment. Maloney:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria.

The Economic Burden of Short-Term Adverse Events Associated with the CHOP Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Lymphoproliferative Disorders in the United States: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5826-5826
Author(s):  
Crystal Watson ◽  
Arie Barlev ◽  
Jodie Worrall ◽  
Steve Duff ◽  
Rachel Beckerman
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
The United States ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Comprehensive Literature Review ◽  
Equity Ownership

Objectives: CHOP (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisone, doxorubicin) is a treatment option for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) following solid organ transplant, an aggressive and potentially fatal disease. The most common and impactful CHOP-related adverse events (AEs) are febrile neutropenia (FN), chemotherapy-induced (CI) peripheral neuropathy (PN), infection, CI-anemia (A), and CI-nausea and vomiting (NV). These CHOP-related AEs have a large humanistic burdensignificant impact to quality of life (QoL) of patients, especially shortly after treatment. The evidence for a positive QoL benefit associated with some AE treatments (e.g., erythropoietin stimulating agents [ESA], granulocyte colony stimulating factors) is inconsistent and many patients likely remain with QoL deficits even after treatment. The impact of these short-term CHOP-related AEs is likely to be accompanied by an increase in healthcare resource utilization and costs. The objective of this study was to explore the economic burden of short-term CHOP-associated AEs in PTLD patients. Since PTLD is a rare disease with limited available data, we expanded our search to include all patients with lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD). Methods: Short-term (within several months after treatment) AEs associated with CHOP with an incidence of >4% in patients with LPDs were determined and sourced from the published literature and cancer websites. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE to identify economic burden studies published from 2010 to 2018 of the AEs associated with CHOP and its components in the United States (US). Studies incorporating rituximab alongside CHOP (CHOP + R) were also included as this is a valid treatment option for PTLD patients. Economic burden was defined as the management costs and resource utilization associated with treating CHOP-emergent adverse events. The conduct of this comprehensive literature review was guided by the PRISMA protocol wherein the research question (using the PICOS format), search strategy, target short-term AEs, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were pre-specified in detail. Results: Overall, 3,946 non-duplicate citations were screened, 39 studies were included for abstraction and no studies included patients with PTLD. Studies were methodologically heterogenous, with approximately half (56%) based on some form of retrospective analysis or prospective observational study. FN was the AE most commonly encountered, followed by CIA, infection, CI-nausea and vomiting, and CIPN. FN was an important driver of hospitalization (proportion of FN patients with hospitalization was up to 83.2%) and extended length of stay (LOS) was substantial for several AEs (LOS range in days: infection, 8.4-23.6; FN, 7.9-19.7). Mean LOS was longer in FN patients with multiple hospitalizations as well as in FN patients with comorbidities. Rates of transfusion in CI-anemia patients varied dramatically, from 10.8% to 47.4%. Transfusion rates were attenuated by ESA use in LPD patients, although a significant proportion of anemic cancer patients receiving ESAs still required transfusions. Total management costs were highly variable, ranging from nominal for events such as CIPN to over $197,000 in hospitalization costs per infection discharge per patients complicated with clostridium difficile. One recent study showed the inpatient costs attributable to FN were $33,006 per patient per episode. Studies identified CINV as a top reason for unplanned service use, but no studies were identified assessing its economic impact in LPD patients. Outpatient care costs for each AE varied but tended to have a low to moderate economic impact. The costs attributable to several AEs (FN, infection) were highest in the first cycle of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Several common short-term AEs due to CHOP in the LPD population were associated with substantial healthcare resource utilization and costs that were primarily driven by increased hospitalization and length of inpatient stays. Costs for FN and infections associated with CHOP ranged from $33,000 to over $197,000, demonstrating the high economic burden to the US healthcare system. No PTLD-specific studies were found, highlighting the absence of published data addressing the economic burden associated with chemotherapy in PTLD patients and the need for effective and tolerable therapies. Disclosures Watson: Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barlev:Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Worrall:Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc: Consultancy. Duff:Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc: Consultancy. Beckerman:Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc: Consultancy.

The Economic Burden of Pleural Effusions (PE) In Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3841-3841
Author(s):  
Eric Qiong Wu ◽  
Annie Guerin ◽  
Vamsi Bollu ◽  
Denise Williams ◽  
Amy Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Medical Cost ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Total Medical Cost ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3841 Background: Ph+ CML patients may develop PE, as an adverse event of some tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) drug therapy. PE is characterized by an excessive accumulation of fluid in the fluid-filled space that surrounds the lungs. PE requires medical care, may compromise the course of CML treatment, and have economic consequence beyond the costs of treating PE. Aim: To compare healthcare resource utilization and costs between CML patients treated with a TKI who developed PE and their matched PE-free controls. Methods: MarketScan and Ingenix Impact databases (2001-2009) were combined to identify adult CML patients (ICD-9CM code 205.1×) who received ≥1 prescription of imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib before the index date and had continuous enrollment ≥6 months prior to and after the index date. The index date was defined as 30 days before the first PE diagnosis (ICD-9CM code 511.9×) for patients with PE and was randomly selected among all the eligible calendar dates (i.e., following a prescription for a TKI and a diagnosis for CML) for the PE-free controls. Patients were followed for 6 months after the index date. PE and PE-free patients were matched on a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. PE-related (i.e., medical claims with a PE diagnosis) resource utilization (inpatient [IP], outpatient [OP], emergency room [ER] and other medical visits) and costs were estimated for PE patients. To estimate the overall incremental impact of PE, all-cause and CML-related (i.e., medical services associated with a diagnosis code of 205.1×) resource utilization and costs were compared between PE and PE-free controls. All costs were reported in 2009 US dollars. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for healthcare resource utilization were estimated by Poisson regression models. Incremental costs were estimated using generalized linear models or two-part models. Multivariate regression models controlled for age, gender, treatment duration with tyrosine kinase inhibitor, other chemotherapy, bone marrow or stem cell transplant, CML complexity, Charlson comorbidity index, adverse events, and comorbidities. Results: The study included 179 matched pairs. On average, patients were 63.4 and 63.8 years old with 41% and 49% of the population being female for PE-free and PE patients, respectively. During the study period, PE patients were estimated to have an average of 0.62 PE-related IP admissions, 8.43 IP days, 0.06 ER admissions, and 1.76 OP visits. Compared to PE-free patients, PE patients had more than 7 times as many IP days (IRR=7.23; p<.01), almost 3 times as many IP admissions (IRR=2.96; p<0.01), almost twice as many OP visits (IRR=1.98; p<.01) and ER visits (IRR=1.77; p<.01). Especially, PE patients had almost 10 times as many CML-related IP days (IRR=9.91; p<.01), more than 3 times as many CML-related IP admissions (IRR=3.95; p<0.01), twice as many CML-related OP visits (IRR=2.16; p<.01), and almost 6 times as many CML-related ER visits (IRR=5.60; p<.01). On average, PE-related medical costs were estimated at $11,015 per patient, where 84.2% was accounted for by IP costs. Total costs for all-cause related medical services were estimated at $37,566 for PE patients and $14,841 for PE-free patients. After adjusting for confounding factors, the incremental total medical cost of PE patients was $22,299 (p<.01), mostly due to the incremental OP cost ($12,931; p<.01) and IP cost ($8,737; p<.01). Similarly, PE patients incurred higher CML-related medical costs compared to PE-free patients, with a $15,859 (p<.01) incremental cost. Conclusion: Compared to PE-free patients, PE patients have a substantial economic burden with higher PE-related costs, CML-related costs, and total medical cost. Disclosures: Wu: Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Guerin:Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Bollu:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Williams:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ponce de Leon Barido:Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Yu:Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Associated with Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence in Patients with Cancer

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4734-4734
Author(s):  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Keith R. McCrae ◽  
Dejan Milentijevic ◽  
Jonathan Fortier ◽  
François Laliberté ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Abstract Introduction: Patients with cancer are not only at a high risk for developing primary but also recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). These events lead to increased burden of cancer management and healthcare costs. It was estimated that all-cause health care costs for cancer patients with VTE were $30,538/patient higher than in those without VTE (Khorana, 2013). To our knowledge, very little information exists on cost of VTE recurrence among cancer patients. The objective of this study was to analyze resource utilization and costs of patients with cancer experiencing a VTE recurrence using a large claims database. Methods: Medical and pharmacy claims from the Humana Database between 1/1/2013 and 05/31/2015 were analyzed. Newly diagnosed cancer patients with a first VTE diagnosis occurring after their first cancer diagnosis and with ≥1 dispensing of an anticoagulant agent within 7 days after their VTE diagnosis, were selected. Baseline characteristics were evaluated during the 6 month period prior to the index VTE. VTE recurrences were defined as hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of VTE. Patients were classified into two groups: patients who experienced a VTE recurrence and patients who did not. Resource utilization and costs were evaluated for the entire follow up period, starting with the initiation of the anticoagulant therapy until whichever was earlier, end of eligibility or end of data. Healthcare resource utilization evaluated included number of hospitalizations, hospitalization days, emergency room (ER) visits, and outpatient visits. All-cause and VTE-related healthcare resource utilization was evaluated. Comparisons between patients with a VTE recurrence and patients without a VTE recurrence were performed using rate ratios (RR) and statistical differences between groups as well as 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] were calculated using Poisson regression models. All-cause and VTE-related healthcare costs were evaluated in per-patient-per-year (PPPY) and compared using mean cost difference. Results: A total of 2,428 newly diagnosed cancer patients who developed VTE and were treated with anticoagulants were identified. Of these, 413 (17.1%) experienced recurrent VTE during the follow up period. Patients who developed recurrent VTE and those who did not were similar in terms of age, gender, race, and region. No statistically significant differences between groups were observed in Charlson comorbidity index or in selected comorbidities during the 6 month baseline period. However, more patients with recurrent VTE recurrence had their index VTE documented during a hospitalization (61.3% vs. 55.4%, p=0.03). Patients with a VTE recurrence had significantly more ER and outpatient visits at baseline compared to those without recurrence, but no statistically significant difference was observed in baseline total healthcare costs ($29,352 vs. $27,955, p=0.44, respectively). The mean follow-up was similar between groups: 9.6 months for patients experiencing a VTE recurrence and 9.3 months for patients without a VTE recurrence (p=0.4059). Patients with a VTE recurrence had higher all-cause resource utilization rates (RRs; 95% CI) compared to patients without a VTE recurrence (hospitalization [2.37; 2.23 - 2.52], hospitalization days [2.64; 2.57 - 2.72], ER visits [1.62; 1.48 - 1.76], and outpatient visits [1.26; 1.24 - 1.28]). The rates of VTE-related hospitalization and VTE-related hospitalization days were close to $30,000 higher in patients with a VTE recurrence (Figure 1). The all-cause healthcare costs were $84,708 PPPY in patients with a VTE recurrence compared to $44,903 in patients without a VTE recurrence. The difference was mainly explained by lower VTE-related hospitalization costs (Figure 2). Conclusion: This real-world claims analysis showed that cancer patients with recurrent VTE consume significantly more healthcare resources. Total healthcare costs were nearly 2-fold higher in cohort with than in cohort without VTE recurrence. Close to 75% of the total cost difference was associated with VTE recurrence. VTE-related costs were ~4-fold higher in cohort with than in cohort without VTE recurrence. Reducing VTE recurrence in patients with cancer could lead to substantial healthcare cost savings. Figure 1 VTE-Related Healthcare Resource Utilization Figure 1. VTE-Related Healthcare Resource Utilization Figure 2 VTE-Related Healthcare Costs, PPPY Figure 2. VTE-Related Healthcare Costs, PPPY Disclosures Khorana: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Halozyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. McCrae:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Milentijevic:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fortier:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Laliberté:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Crivera:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lefebvre:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Schein:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Own in excess of $10,000 of J&J stock.

scholarly journals Healthcare Resource Utilization with Rasburicase in the Management of Patients with Tumor Lysis in the Outpatient Setting: Results from a Community Oncology Cohort

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3401-3401
Author(s):  
Ali McBride ◽  
Melissa Hagan ◽  
Mei Xue ◽  
Robert E Smith
Keyword(s):  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Tumor Lysis ◽  
Chemotherapy Group ◽  
Community Oncology

BACKGROUND and OBJECTIVE: Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), a potentially fatal oncologic complication, can have a significant clinical and economic impact to patients and the healthcare system. The aim of this analysis was to examine healthcare resource utilization in patients treated with rasburicase for the management of tumor lysis in the outpatient versus inpatient setting. METHODS: Adult patients were selected from the Integra Connect Database (IC) if they were treated with rasburicase between January 1, 2017 and March 31, 2019. The IC database comprises clinical and financial records for more than 750,000 community oncology patients, including 25,000 active Oncology Care Model participants representing approximately 20% of the unique beneficiaries in this Medicare model. Patients treated in the outpatient setting were divided into 3 groups: Primary Prophylaxis- treatment with rasburicase administered days 0-2 of chemotherapy (Group A), Early Reactive- rasburicase administered days 3-5 of chemotherapy (Group B), and Late Reactive- rasburicase administered after day 5 of chemotherapy (Group C). Inpatients were divided into 2 groups: Inpatient TLS Treatment- patients admitted and treated for TLS with rasburicase and who had not received rasburicase as part of their outpatient chemotherapy regimen (Group D) and Inpatient Chemotherapy- patients admitted for chemotherapy who were given rasburicase (Group E). Demographic, clinical characteristics including tumor types, lab values, and dose information were collected. Total cost of rasburicase was calculated as mean drug cost per patient. All variables were summarized descriptively as mean (SD), median (min and max) or counts (percentages). RESULTS: A total of 265 patients treated with rasburicase were included in the analysis. Of those, 189 patients received rasburicase in the outpatient setting vs 76 in the inpatient setting. None of the 189 patients in Groups A, B, and C who received outpatient rasburicase required admission due to TLS. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as rasburicase utilization, were similar between cohorts (Table 1 and Table 2). Our results show that while 54% of patients in Groups B, C, and D were initially treated with allopurinol, these patients were switched to rasburicase, indicating failure of allopurinol alone. The total cost of rasburicase trended lower in the outpatient vs inpatient setting ($9,287 vs $11,959). However, a more appropriate comparator to this cost is the published data for charges incurred for inpatient treatment of TLS, shown to be $151,9171 CONCLUSIONS: TLS continues to impact patients with diagnoses and chemotherapy regimens at intermediate and high risk for development of this syndrome. This study demonstrates that allopurinol is frequently inadequate and replacement with rasburicase is needed. We found rasburicase to be effective from both a clinical and a cost perspective in preventing TLS-related hospitalization. While rasburicase is most efficiently employed as primary prevention, close monitoring of patients allows effective reactive utilization evidenced by none of the outpatients in this study who received rasburicase were admitted for TLS. This study highlights the opportunity for greater utilization of rasburicase in the outpatient setting, as a means to lower the total cost of care. 1. Pathak et al. Blood. 2017; 130:3390 Disclosures McBride: teva: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy.

scholarly journals VTE-Related Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Associated with Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients Treated with Anticoagulants

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3524-3524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Streiff ◽  
Dejan Milentijevic ◽  
Keith R. McCrae ◽  
Jonathan Fortier ◽  
François Laliberté ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Outpatient Visits ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Care Costs

Abstract Introduction: The standard of care for treatment of cancer-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a low molecular heparin (LMWH). In our previous claimsbased analysis, we showed that besides LMWH oral anticoagulants, warafrin and rivaroxaban are widely prescribed in clinical practice (Khorana, 2015). The objective of this study is to compare VTE-related healthcare resource utilization and costs of cancer patients treated with anticoagulant therapies. Methods: Medical and pharmacy claims from the Humana Database between 1/1/2013 and 05/31/2015 were analyzed. Newly diagnosed cancer patients with a first VTE diagnosis occurring after their first cancer diagnosis and with ≥1 dispensing of an anticoagulant agent within 7 days after their VTE diagnosis, were selected. Based on the first anticoagulant agent received, patients were classified into one of the following cohorts: LMWH, warfarin, and rivaroxaban. Inverse probability of treatment weights based on propensity score was used to adjust for differences between treatment cohorts. Baseline characteristics were evaluated during the 6 month period prior to the index VTE. VTE-related resource utilization and costs were identified with a primary or secondary diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and were evaluated for the entire follow up period, starting from the initiation of the anticoagulant therapy until the earliest either end of enrollment or end of data availability (05/31/2015). Resource utilization components included: number of hospitalizations, hospitalization days, emergency room (ER) visits, and outpatient visits. Comparisons between the different treatment cohorts were performed using rate ratios (RR) and statistical differences between groups as well as 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] were calculated using Poisson regression models. Healthcare costs were evaluated in per-patient-per-year (PPPY) and compared using mean cost difference. Results: A total of 2,428 patients (LMWH: n=660; warfarin; n=1,061; rivaroxaban: n=707) were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced across the treatment cohorts including hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, and outpatient visits. Compared to patients treated with LMWH, patients treated with rivaroxaban had significantly fewer VTE-related hospitalizations, hospitalization days, ER visits, and outpatient visits (Figure 1). This resulted in significantly higher VTE-related health care cost difference of $12,000 for LMWH relative to rivaroxaban treatment cohort (Table 1). Patients treated with rivaroxaban had significantly lower VTE-related resource utilization compared to patients treated with warfarin (Figure 1). The total VTE-related costs were however similar between two cohorts (Table 1). The higher drug costs ($1,519) were offset by significantly lower outpatient (-$1,039) and hospitalization costs (-$522) in rivaroxaban relative to warfarin cohort. Conclusion: Healthcare resource use and costs associated with VTE treatment in cancer patients are the highest with LMWH relative to warfarin and rivaroxaban treatments. Healthcare resources use and costs are significantly higher in warfarin relative to rivaroxaban cohort but these resource costs were offset by higher drug costs of rivaroxaban. These results are in line with previous study in cancer patients that found fewer re-hospitalizations related to VTE recurrences in patients treated with rivaroxaban compared to patient treated with LMWH or warfarin (Streiff, 2016). Figure 1 VTE-Related Healthcare Resource Utilization Figure 1. VTE-Related Healthcare Resource Utilization Table VTE-Related Health Care Costs, PPPY Table. VTE-Related Health Care Costs, PPPY Disclosures Streiff: Roche: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding. Milentijevic:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. McCrae:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fortier:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Laliberté:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Lefebvre:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Schein:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Own in excess of $10,000 of J&J stock. Khorana:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Halozyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Analysis of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs after the Initiation of Biologic Treatment in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease

10.36469/9791 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Perera ◽  
Shibing Yang ◽  
Marni Stott-Miller ◽  
Joanne Brady
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Outpatient Visits ◽  
Ed Visits

Background: This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe and quantify healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) following initiation of biologic therapy. Methods: Resource utilization and costs were analyzed at baseline and 1- and 2-years after initiating a biologic. Data were extracted from a US administrative health insurance claims database for adults ≥18 years. Eligible patients were continuously enrolled in a health plan with medical and pharmacy benefits for ≥12 months prior to, and 12 months (primary analysis) or 24 months (secondary analysis) after index date (biologic initiation). Results: In total, 4864 and 2692 patients with UC, and 8910 and 5227 patients with CD were identified in the 1- and 2-year follow-up cohorts, respectively. Of 1-year follow-up cohort patients, 45% received the same biologic initiated at index for ≥1 year. Infliximab and adalimumab were the most commonly initiated biologics in patients with UC or CD. The highest proportion of patients who continued with the same biologic after 1-and 2-years had initiated therapy with infliximab for both indications (although at the 1-year follow-up for CD, the highest proportion continued to use natalizumab, but this was a small sample [n=15]). Generally, the proportion of patients having inpatient admissions and emergency department (ED) visits decreased after receiving the same biologic for 1 year compared with baseline, although the proportion having outpatient visits did not change. Mean per patient all-cause costs for inpatient hospitalizations, ED visits and outpatient visits decreased for patients with UC or CD who received the same biologic for 1 year, while mean pharmacy costs per patient increased. Conclusions; This descriptive analysis shows that although biologics effectively reduced inpatient and ED resource utilization and corresponding costs in patients with UC and CD, total management costs increased, driven by increased pharmacy costs.

scholarly journals 2374. Healthcare Resource Use, Costs, and Recurrences in Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Real-world Data Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S819-S819
Author(s):  
Winnie Nelson ◽  
Laura Stong ◽  
Naomi Sacks ◽  
Alexandria Portelli ◽  
Bridget Healey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Resource Use ◽  
Diagnosis Code ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Ed Visits

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), especially recurrent CDI (rCDI), is associated with high morbidity and resource use and imposes a significant burden on the US healthcare system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the burden of rCDI on healthcare resource utilization. Methods A retrospective study analyzed commercial claims data from patients aged 18–64 years old in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus™ database. CDI episodes required an inpatient stay with CDI diagnosis code (ICD-9-CM 008.45; ICD-10-CM A04.7, A04.71, A04.72), or an outpatient medical claim with CDI diagnosis code plus a CDI treatment, and index episodes occurred from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2017. Only patients who were observable 6 months before and 12 months after the index CDI episode were included. Each CDI episode was followed by a 14-day claim-free period after the end of treatment. rCDI was defined as another CDI episode within an 8-week window immediately after the claim-free period. Number of CDI and rCDI episodes, healthcare resource use, and costs were calculated over 12-month follow-up and stratified by number of rCDI episodes. Costs were adjusted to 2018 dollars. Results 46,571 patients with an index CDI episode were included, with 3,129 (6.7%) who had 1 rCDI, 472 (1.0%) who had 2 rCDI, and 134 (0.3%) who had 3+ rCDI episodes. Mean age was 47.4 years, and 62.4% were female. In the 12-month follow-up, the mean (SD) numbers of inpatient visits were 1.4 (2.1) for those with no rCDI, 2.7 (3.4) for those with 1 rCDI, 3.7 (3.9) for those with 2 rCDI, and 5.8 (6.0) for those with 3+ rCDI episodes. Emergency department (ED) visits had a similar trend, with mean (SD) number of visits of 1.5 (3.5), 2.5 (6.0), 3.7 (7.0), and 4.6 (13), respectively for the four study groups. All-cause costs after the index CDI were $71,980 for those with no rCDI, $131,953 for those with 1 rCDI, $180,574 for those with 2 rCDI, and $207,733 for those with 3+ rCDI. Conclusion CDI and rCDI are associated with substantial healthcare resource utilization and direct medical costs. During the 12 months after an index CDI episode, the number of inpatient admissions and ED visits increased substantially for patients with an rCDI episode. Direct medical costs for patients with rCDI also increased with number of recurrences. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Healthcare Resource Utilization Trends over Time with Continuous Lenalidomide Treatment (Tx) in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1326-1326
Author(s):  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Dan T. Vogl ◽  
Michel Delforge ◽  
Kevin Song ◽  
Meletios Dimopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Medical Utilization ◽  
Fixed Duration ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematologic condition that is associated with high Tx costs. Resource consumption is driven by hospitalization and medical utilization, which is highest during periods of uncontrolled disease, such as after diagnosis and during relapses (De Portu 2013). In the pivotal phase 3 FIRST trial, continuous Tx with lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) was compared with fixed-duration Rd (Rd18) or fixed-duration combination Tx with melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT), each for 18 months (mos), in NDMM pts who were ineligible for stem cell transplantation. Continuous Rd extended progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (interim analysis) vs. MPT. However, it is still unclear whether extending Tx duration with Rd adversely affects healthcare resource utilization. This analysis quantifies the rates of hospitalizations and medical utilization with continuous Rd over time based on data collected in the FIRST trial. Methods: The FIRST trial (N = 1,623) was a pivotal multinational, randomized, open-label study with a median follow up of 37 mos. Non-protocol-driven resource-use data was collected until subjects discontinued study Tx. To assess whether continuous Rd increases healthcare resource utilization over time, the rates of resource utilization for subjects treated with continuous Rd (N = 535) were plotted for up to 48 mos. In addition, hospitalization and medical utilization rates during the Tx period (18 mos) were estimated and compared between the 2 fixed-duration Tx arms. Results: Resource utilization amongst pts treated with continuous Rd declined over time (Figure). The annualized hospitalization rate in the first 3 mos was 3.2 times higher than the average rate for the remaining 45 mos of follow-up (2.02 vs. 0.62), and 4.2 times higher for medical utilization (5.66 vs. 1.34). After 4 years (yrs) of continuous Rd Tx, hospitalization and medical utilization rates were estimated to be 83% and 84% lower than those observed in the first 3 mos of Tx, reflecting the long-term disease control observed with continuous Rd in the FIRST trial. The highest hospitalization rates were associated with infections (0.20 per patient year), cardiovascular disorders (0.06), and respiratory and thoracic disorders (0.05). The mean (standard deviation) length of stay per admission was 14.08 (21.19) days. The highest medical utilization rates were associated with blood transfusions (0.76 interventions per patient year), general imaging procedures (0.21), respiratory and thoracic imaging procedures (0.20), and therapeutic interventions (0.09).The hospitalization rates for the fixed dose Tx arms were 0.91 (Rd18) and 0.79 (MPT) per patient year of follow-up during the Tx period of 18 mos, resulting in a rate ratio (RR) of 1.15 (1.01–1.30). The equivalent rates for medical utilization were 3.00 (Rd18) and 2.86 (MPT) medical interventions per patient year (RR = 1.05 [0.98–1.12]). Conclusions: The rates of resource utilization among pts treated with continuous Rd dropped substantially after the first 3 mos of Tx, and then gradually declined as Tx duration increased. The findings suggest that continuous Tx with Rd does not further increase resource utilization in hospitalizations and medical utilization compared to fixed-duration Tx. A comparison between the 2 fixed arms showed a 15% increase in hospitalization with Rd18 vs. MPT, and no differences in medical utilization between the 2 arms. A limitation of this analysis is that the resources were collected only while pts were receiving their respective Txs. Future analysis should include all costs generated by healthcare resources throughout pts Tx, including Tx-free intervals, and the costs associated with relapses. Figure 1: Hospitalization and medical utilization rates per patient year for patients treated with continuous Rd Figure 1:. Hospitalization and medical utilization rates per patient year for patients treated with continuous Rd Disclosures Weisel: BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Noxxon: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide used in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Vogl:Amgen: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Delforge:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Song:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dimopoulos:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cavenagh:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Hulin:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Foá:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Oriol:Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Guo:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Monzini:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Van Oostendorp:Celgene: Employment. Ervin-Haynes:Celgene: Employment. Facon:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

O2-11-04: Effect of Dementia Care Management on Healthcare Resource Utilization and Cost: One-year follow-Up Results of the Delphi Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. P255-P255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Michalowsky ◽  
Jochen René Thyrian ◽  
Diana Wucherer ◽  
Tilly Eichler ◽  
Johannes Hertel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Costs of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin Treatment Among Morbidly Obese Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2537-2537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽  
Veronica Ashton ◽  
Yen-Wen Chen ◽  
Bingcao Wu ◽  
Eric D. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Warfarin Treatment ◽  
Inpatient Hospitalizations ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background: Use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m2) patients for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment is not fully understood. Current International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidelines do not recommend DOAC use in morbidly obese patients due to limited clinical data in this patient population. Objective: Compare risk of recurrent VTE, major bleeding, healthcare resource utilization, and costs between morbidly obese VTE patients initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin treatment. Methods: This is a retrospective 1:1 propensity score matched cohort study. VTE patients initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin were identified from Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental database (12/1/2011-12/31/2016). An ICD-9/ICD-10 diagnosis code for morbid obesity was required during the 12 months pre- or 3 months post-initiation. Patients were followed ≥3 months. Analyses were conducted during the entire follow-up period regardless of discontinuation as well as on-treatment prior to discontinuation of index treatment. Major bleeding was assessed using the validated claims-based algorithm developed by Cunningham et al. 2011. Conditional logistic regression and generalized linear models were used to compare recurrent VTE and major bleeding risks, all-cause healthcare resource utilization, and per patient per year (PPPY) costs. Results: Among 5,780 rivaroxaban or warfarin treated patients (2,890 in each matched cohort), mean age was 53 ±13 years; 60% were female; mean follow-up time was 10.0 months and 10.5 months, respectively. Mean time between VTE diagnosis and treatment start was 14 days. Risk of recurrent VTE was similar for both cohorts in the intent-to-treat analysis (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.85-1.14, p=0.844). Major bleeding risk was numerically lower for the rivaroxaban cohort but did not reach statistical significance in the on-treatment analysis (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.47-1.19, p=0.227). Rivaroxaban treated patients utilized fewer all-cause healthcare resources, specifically inpatient hospitalizations (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.96, p=0.006) and outpatient visits (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.10-0.56, p=0.001) compared to warfarin (Table). Rivaroxaban patients incurred an average $2,829 lower total medical costs PPPY, ($34,824 vs $37,653, p=0.020), mainly driven by hospitalization costs. Total healthcare costs (including pharmacy) showed a numerical $1,531 reduction for rivaroxaban patients, not reaching statistical significance ($43,034 vs. $44,565, p=0.237). Conclusions: Our study showed that morbidly obese VTE patients treated with rivaroxaban had similar risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding compared to warfarin. Treatment with rivaroxaban yielded less all-cause healthcare resource utilization (i.e. inpatient hospitalizations and outpatient visits) and reduced total medical costs. Disclosures Spyropoulos: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy. Ashton:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment. Chen:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment. Wu:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment. Peterson:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document