scholarly journals Inferior Survival with Use of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant As Second-Line Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2026-2026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara A. Rosenbaum ◽  
Danny Luan ◽  
Paul J Christos ◽  
Roger Pearse ◽  
Danielle Guarneri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Delayed Group

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable with eventual relapse and death occurring despite multiple lines of chemotherapy. Standard frontline therapy for MM has traditionally consisted of combinations of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and dexamethasone followed by consolidation with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). A randomized trial using IMiD and PI-based induction demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with upfront ASCT in consolidation compared to ASCT in second-line at relapse, but no OS benefit (Attal et al, NEJM, 2017). Delay of ASCT to second-line or beyond may in part be due to the aforementioned lack of OS benefit shown with upfront ASCT and increase of sustained deep responses, including MRD negativity, to novel frontline 3 and 4-drug regimens and continuation of therapy in the frontline. We performed a chart review comparing PFS1, PFS2, and overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent upfront ASCT as consolidation to those who received ASCT in the second-line after one relapse ('delayed ASCT'). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Weill Cornell Medical College. Methods: 124 MM patients who underwent ASCT either as consolidation in first-line or delayed ASCT after relapsing on one prior treatment between 2010-2016 were included. Demographics and clinical parameters were extracted from the electronic medical record. PFS1, PFS2, and OS were calculated from date of diagnosis to first relapse, second relapse, and death, respectively. Patients were censored if lost to follow-up prior to experiencing the relevant event. PFS1, PFS2, and OS of patients receiving upfront ASCT were compared to those of patients receiving delayed ASCT. Log-rank tests were used to statistically evaluate differences between Kaplan-Meier PFS/OS curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) using upfront ASCT as the reference treatment. Results: Among the 124 patients, 93 underwent upfront ASCT as consolidation and 31 underwent delayed ASCT after relapsing on one prior line of therapy (Table 1). Induction regimens and pre-transplant therapies received are detailed in Table 1. Of the delayed group patients, 6 underwent ASCT directly without second-line induction and 25 as consolidation after second-line therapy. Patients receiving upfront ASCT had significantly longer median PFS1 compared to patients who received delayed ASCT (6.45 vs 1.25 years; P<0.001), with a HR of 0.18 (95% CI, 0.11-0.29) (Figure 1A). Median PFS2 in the upfront ASCT group was likewise significantly longer than in the delayed group (9.19 vs 3.69 years; P<0.001), with a HR of 0.31 (95% CI, 0.18-0.55) (Figure 1B). With a median follow-up of 6.0 and 5.8 years in the upfront and delayed groups, respectively, median OS was not reached in either group but trended towards prolonged survival with upfront ASCT (P=0.052), with a HR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.20 to 1.03) (Figure 1C). Conclusions: In this cohort of 124 MM patients undergoing ASCT as consolidation in the upfront setting or delayed ASCT in second-line after relapse, upfront ASCT was associated with significantly improved PFS1 and PFS2, similar to findings by Attal et al. However, in that study, no difference in OS was seen between upfront and delayed groups, while our data, with longer follow-up, showed median OS trending towards significance. This has important implications as with use of novel induction regimens and maintenance therapy, ASCT is more commonly being delayed to early relapse in second-line or beyond. If transplant is intended to be used in the first few lines of therapy, our data show that delaying ASCT even to second-line has a significant negative impact on PFS. In addition, a shorter OS with delayed transplant was suggested although did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to small numbers or more patients with high-risk MM in the delayed group. It is also important to note the lack of daratumumab-based regimens which may have improved PFS/OS in either or both arms. Thus, our findings should be prospectively validated in a larger trial of ASCT as consolidation in first-line vs second-line or beyond using novel, monoclonal antibody-based regimens. Disclosures Rosenbaum: Janssen: Research Funding; Honoraria Akcea: Other: Accordant Health. Coleman:Gilead, Bayer, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau. Van Besien:Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Niesvizky:Takeda, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

The Outcome of Different Types of Second-Line Therapy in Multiple Myeloma Patients Relapsing After Uniform Front-Line Treatment with High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2892-2892
Author(s):  
Claudia Crippa ◽  
Samantha Ferrari ◽  
Monica Drera ◽  
Marinella Calarco ◽  
Antonio Regazzoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Abstract 2892 Poster Board II-868 Background and aim. While multiple myeloma (MM) still remains largely incurable, therapeutic options for patients with MM are expanding. However the best way to use the different effective regimens, either in combination or in sequence, during the course of MM in the single patient is still unknown. Data from controlled studies rarely report the treatments received before and after the enrollment of patients in the clinical trial, which may significantly impact on response and survival. As an example, the best treatment for patients relapsing after first-line high-dose melphalan (HD-Mel) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is not standardized. To this end we have retrospectively analyzed an uniform cohort of such patients treated at our Institution, comparing their outcome according to the type of second-line and further consolidation treatment received. Patients and methods. In 156 patients affected by MM and treated between 1997 and 2008 with HD-Mel and ASCT as first line therapy, relapse has occurred in 92 (59%). Females were 39 (42%), males 53 (58%), median age was 60 (range 34-75). As induction therapy before ASCT, 89 (97%) had received VAD regimen, and only 3 (3%) thalidomide/bortezomib-based regimen. Sixty-one patients (66%) had received a single ASCT and 31 a double ASCT (34%). A second-line therapy was given to 87/92 patients. They were subdivided in 3 subgroups according to the type of second-line treatment received: 1) thalidomide-based regimens (THAL) were given to 55 pts (63%) followed by a consolidation ASCT in 13 (24%) 2) bortezomib-based regimens (BORT) were used in 13 (15%) and subsequent ASCT in 3 of them (23%) 3) chemotherapy and/or steroids (CHEMO) were used in 19 (22%) followed by ASCT in 15 (79%). Median follow-up from diagnosis was 57 (13-145) in THAL, 39 (17-140) in BORT and 59 months (25-113) in CHEMO respectively. The baseline characteristics, including age, of the three subgroups were similar as well as the CR/VGPR and ORR rates obtained after first-line treatment (THAL 47% and 87%; BORT 69% and 100%; CHEMO 53% and 100%, respectively). The subgroups also did not differ in median duration of first response, which ranged from 13 to 15 months and median time to second treatment, which was 26 months in all subgroups. The proportion of patients receiving a double ASCT were significantly higher in BORT (69%) compared to THAL (34%) (P=0.03) and CHEMO (5%) (p=0.002), and in THAL (34%) compared to CHEMO (5%) (p=0.015). Results. After second line therapy the ORR (CR+VGPR+ PR) of the three subgroups was: THAL 60%, BORT 77% and CHEMO 58%. (p=NS). The second CR/VGPR rate was non significantly higher after BORT (46%) than after THAL (25%) or CHEMO (21%) (p=0.17). Moreover, when considering patients not undergoing second-line consolidation ASCT, the ORR was significantly better in THAL and BORT subgroups compared to CHEMO (50%, 70% and 0%, respectively p=0.03). After a median follow-up from second-line treatment of 28 months (range 1-99), the 2-y PFS was 38% after THAL (median 18 months), 34% after BORT (median 16 months) and 17% after CHEMO (median 12 months) (p=NS). The 2-y OS was 78% (median 49 months), 70% (median not reached), and 70% (median 33 month) after THAL, BORT and CHEMO, respectively (p=NS). However when considering patients not undergoing second-line consolidation ASCT, the 2-y OS was significantly better after THAL and BORT than after CHEMO (p=0.024). Conclusion. In spite of having frequently received a first-line double ASCT, BORT patients seemed to achieve responses of better quality. However, in patients relapsing after first-line HD-Mel and ASCT, the choice of THAL, BORT or CHEMO-based regimens as second-line therapy did not seem to impact on overall response rates and survival, provided that patients treated with CHEMO could be consolidated with a second ASCT. Hence newer drugs may be reserved for those patients not fit for ASCT, preserving them for effective third-line treatment in the other patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Cytarabine plus mitoxantrone versus cytarabine plus clofarabine as second-line therapy in AML.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18001-e18001
Author(s):  
Zartash Gul ◽  
Asheesh Jain ◽  
Stacey A. Slone ◽  
Ali Raufi ◽  
Emily Marie Van Meter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Bridging Strategy

e18001 Background: There are no comparative studies that can provide guidance about the choice of second line therapy in AML patients (pts). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 30 consecutive pts who underwent reinduction chemotherapy for AML with mitoxantrone and cytarabine (ACM) or cytarabine and clofarabine (ACC). Results: Baseline characteristics of the pts are described in the Table. Ten pts achieved remission after initial induction therapy in ACM group and 4 pts in ACC group (P=0.71). Median length of remission was 314 days (d) (81-874 d) in ACM group and 178.5 d (57-232 d) in ACC group (P=0.13).After reinduction in ACM and ACC groups 9 and 3 patients achieved remission respectively (P=0.4).One pt in each group underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant. After a median follow-up of 11.2 m (ACM) and 10.5m (ACC), 9 and 6 pts had died in ACM and ACC groups respectively. Causes of death were progression (ACM=2pts, ACC= 1pt), end organ failure (3 pts each) and unknown (ACM=4pts, ACC=2 pts). Median Overall survival (OS) was 18.4 months (m) in ACM and 13.1 m in ACC group (P=0.49). After reinduction therapy OS was 8.3 and 6.9 m in ACM and ACC groups (P=0.72). In our patient cohort we did not find any baseline characteristics that were associated with OS or achievement of remission after reinduction therapy. Conclusions: In our pt cohort both ACM and ACC regimens demonstrated the ability to induce remission as a possible bridging strategy to allogeniec stem cell transplant. Larger studies are needed to compare these two regimens as well as evaluate any baseline characteristics which correlate with OS or achievement of remission. [Table: see text]

Use of Alkylating Agents Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma in a National Registry, 2006-2008.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4941-4941
Author(s):  
Carla M Van Bennekom ◽  
Theresa E Anderson ◽  
Noopur Raje ◽  
Kenneth C Anderson ◽  
David W Kaufman
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Abstract 4941 Background While alkylating agents were among the earliest treatments for multiple myeloma, newer therapies have been available for several years. Here we describe patterns of use and effectiveness of alkylators in the modern landscape of myeloma treatment, based on a nationwide registry of recently diagnosed patients. Methods The “Patient Registries at Slone: Myeloma” is a national disease-based observational registry conducted by Boston University. All patients with myeloma diagnosed within 4 months of enrollment were eligible for inclusion. Subjects enrolled by mail or over the internet; information on treatment, clinical events, and quality of life was obtained by questionnaire and from medical record review at baseline and at six-month intervals. There were 342 patients with multiple myeloma residing in 43 states who were enrolled from June 2006-October 2008 and completed at least a baseline questionnaire. The median length of follow-up was 8 months after diagnosis (range 0.5-24). Results Alkylators were used as initial treatment in 26 patients (8%), as second-line treatment in 14 (4%), and as part of a transplant regimen in 76 (22%). Patients who received alkylators as initial or second-line therapy tended to be older (median age, 69 vs. 60 years, p<0.0005), and the combined prevalence of use was 17% among patients who did not have prescription drug insurance, compared with 11% among those who did (p=0.36). The prevalence of first-line use was 12% among patients diagnosed in 2006, 9% in 2007, and 4% in 2008 (p=0.09). Further results are confined to 34 of the 40 first or second-line alkylator recipients for whom medical records were available. The regimens used are shown in the table; the majority of patients received regimens that included melphalan. The median duration of initial therapy was 3 months (range 0.5-15); 6 patients (24%) had at least a partial response. Ten patients were still on treatment at the end of follow-up; in 15 (60%), alkylator therapy was changed to another regimen (11) or stopped without new therapy during the follow-up period (4), including 3 due to insufficient response and 5 due to toxicity. The new regimens were thalidomide-based in 2 patients, bortezomib-based in 3, bortezomib+lenalidomide in 1, dexamethasone without novel agents in 2, and 3 patients went directly to autologous stem-cell transplant. Second-line therapy with alkylators was initiated due to insufficient response from the previous regimen in 2 patients, because of side effects in 5, and for cost reasons in 2. The median duration was 2 months (range 0.5-12, with 4 patients still on treatment), and 4 (44%) had a partial or better response. The immediately preceding regimen was thalidomide-based in 5 patients, lenalidomide-based in 1, and bortezomib-based in 3; the median number of previous regimens was 2 per patient (range, 1-4). The median duration of previous therapy was 4 months (range 0.5-9). Conclusions The present population-based results indicate that in the modern era of myeloma treatment, the most prevalent use of alkylating agents is as conditioning for stem cell transplants; the drugs are also still used for initial treatment, mostly in combination with novel agents, although the prevalence was low overall and continued to decline during 2006-2008. Patients who received alkylators for initial or second-line therapy were older and the agents appeared to be somewhat more commonly used among those who did not have prescription drug insurance. The data suggest that there continues to be a useful role for alkylating agents as initial therapy, particularly for myeloma patients who are not transplant candidates, and occasionally as an early replacement for novel agents that prove ineffective or excessively toxic in individual patients. With a relatively short duration of follow-up, there was little information on the use of alkylators in the relapsed setting, where their high level of anti-myeloma activity might be expected to lead to more use. Disclosures Van Bennekom: Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Anderson:Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Raje:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kaufman:Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation For Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis Of The IFM 2005-02 Trial

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 406-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Attal ◽  
Valérie Lauwers-Cances ◽  
Gérald Marit ◽  
Denis Caillot ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line

Abstract Methods and Patients This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial investigated the efficacy of lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance after transplantation for multiple myeloma. Patients, under 65 years of age, with non-progressive disease after a first-line autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) were randomized to receive maintenance with placebo or LEN (10 to 15 mg/d) until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. From July 2006 to August 2008, 614 patients were randomized. In January 2011, the DSMB recommended to stop LEN due to the increased incidence of second primary malignancies (SPMs). The median duration of maintenance treatment with LEN was 2 years (IQ range= 1-3). We previously reported this trial with a median follow-up of 45 months (Attal et al, N Engl J Med 2012). Results As of May 2013, median follow-up was 70 months from diagnosis and 60 months from randomization. LEN maintenance improved the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) post randomization: 42%, versus 18% with placebo (p<0.0001), respectively. Overall, 403 patients had disease progression and 364 have started a second line therapy. The median 2nd PFS for the treated patients (time from progression in first-line to the second progression or last follow-up or death) was 10 months within the LEN arm versus 18 months within the placebo arm (p<0.0001), respectively. The median 2nd PFS in the LEN and placebo groups were 9 and 8 months (NS) for patients treated with a bortezomib-based regimen, 8 months and 18 months (p<0.01) for patients treated with an IMiD-based regimen, 14 months and 28 months (p=0.03) for patients treated with a regimen without new agents or with a second line ASCT, respectively. The 5-year post randomization overall survival (OS) was similar in the 2 groups: 68% in the LEN group versus 67% in the placebo group (HR=1). In the multivariate analysis, the OS was significantly related to age (p=0.001), International Staging System (p=0.03), and poor cytogenetics (t(4;14) or chromosome 17 deletion; p=0.008). The median survival after the first progression was 29 months in the LEN group versus 48 months in the placebo group (p< 0.0001). An increased incidence of SPMs was observed in the LEN group: 44 SPMs (hematologic: 20, non-hematologic: 24) in 35 patients were reported in the LEN group versus 28 SPMs (hematologic: 6, non-hematologic: 22) in 20 patients in the placebo group. The incidence of SPMs (excluding non melanoma skin cancers) was 2.3 per 100 patient-years in the LEN group versus 1.3 in the placebo group (p=0.03). Conclusion This new analysis confirms that lenalidomide is an effective treatment to prolong PFS after transplantation for multiple myeloma patients. However, this impressive benefit is not currently associated with an improved overall survival, due to a shorter survival after the first progression. Disclosures: Attal: CELGENE: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: FRONTLINE THERAPY WITH CARFILZOMIB IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA. Facon:JANSSEN: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hulin:JANSSEN: Honoraria; CELGENE: Honoraria. Moreau:JANSSEN: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Roussel:JANSSEN: Honoraria; CELGENE: Honoraria. Avet-Loiseau:JANSSEN: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Lenalidomide Maintenance Does Not Negatively Impact Overall and Progression Free Survival Using Lenalidomide-Based Regimens for Multiple Myeloma in First Relapse

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5643-5643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Cherniawsky ◽  
Zack M. Breckenridge ◽  
Irwindeep Sandhu ◽  
Michael P. Chu ◽  
Joanne D. Hewitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Aggressive Disease ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BACKGROUND Outcomes in multiple myeloma have improved dramatically over the last decade however, optimal sequencing of therapy remains unknown. Specifically, in an era where post-transplant lenalidomide (L) maintenance is now as established standard of care, questions remain around the utility of full dose L-based regimens in second line therapy. In this series, we sought to evaluate the impact of different regimens used at first relapse in patients who received autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in the frontline setting treated with and without lenalidomide maintenance (LM). We focused on the impact of L-based therapies in patients relapsing on LM. METHODS Using our prospectively maintained institutional MM database we retrospectively analyzed patients treated at the Cross Cancer Institute from January, 2005 to January, 2016 to ensure 2 years of follow-up for surviving patients. 4 categories were identified based on 2 variables: receipt of LM following 1st line therapy (yes or no) and receipt of L-based 2nd line therapy (yes or no). The primary endpoint was 2nd PFS defined as time of initiation of second line therapy to relapse, death or last follow-up. OS was defined as time of initiation of first line induction therapy to death or last follow-up. Second OS was defined as time of initiation of second line therapy to death or last follow-up. Survival statistics were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method with SPSS software. A p - value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS 213 patients received standard bortezomib-based induction and ASCT of which 132 (62%) received LM. Median follow up for the LM patients was 48 months compared to 74.6 months in non-LM patients. 103 patients (48%) required treatment with second line therapy. Forty-four percent patients were treated with LM while 56% were not. Sixty-nine percent received L-based therapy at relapse, 21% received PI-based therapy and 8% were treated with a PI-IMID combination (table 1). Focusing on the cohort of relapsed patients who received LM (n=44), the median 2nd PFS was 9.3 months in those that received L-based second line therapy vs 4.1 months in those that did not (p = 0.28, figure 1b]. In patients who did not receive LM (n = 55) the median 2nd PFS was 14.0 months in those who received L-based second line therapy vs 6.9 months in those who did not (p = 0.19, figure 1a. Examining all patients who received L-based therapy at relapse there was no difference in 2nd PFS based on whether LM was given (p = 0.42). The median 2nd OS was not statistically significant between the groups (p = 0.39, figure 1b. Patients on LM had a median 2nd OS of 34 months with L-based therapy at relapse compared to 39.2 months without. The median 2nd OS in non-LM patients was 34.5 months in those receiving L-based therapy at first relapse and 23.4 months in those that did not (p=0.10). There was no statistically significant differences in median OS between the 4 groups (p = 0.83). For patients who received LM the median OS was not reached in those receiving L-based therapies at relapse and was 78.1 months in patients who did not. In patients who did not receive LM the median OS was 78.0 months in those receiving L-based therapies at relapse and 69.3 months in those who did not. CONCLUSION Our data suggests that receiving LM does not negatively impact survival outcomes after receiving full dose L-based therapy at relapse. Both median 2nd PFS and 2nd OS were similar with L-based therapies regardless of prior LM. While the 2nd PFS at relapse does fall short of recently published trials in relapsed MM there are some notable confounders here. Firstly, this real-world data includes frailer patients with potentially greater co-morbidities possibly influencing choice and duration of therapy as well as reflect more aggressive disease biology. Secondly, given the relatively short median follow-up of the relapsed LM patients to date, the cohort may be enriched with "early" relapsers (< 2-years) also potentially indicative of biologically more aggressive disease. As such, this may underestimate the true impact of L-based therapies in patients relapsing on LM. Larger series with longer follow-up are necessary to formally examine whether multi-agent L-based regimens confer additional benefit over L-Dexamethasone or non-L based regimens. Real world registries will be useful as prospective trials are unlikely to be done. Disclosures Sandhu: Novartis: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Venner:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Is a Feasible Treatment For Older Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3408-3408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hillary Glick ◽  
Connie Lee ◽  
Craig S. Sauter ◽  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Matthew J. Matasar
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Relapsed Disease ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Background Relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma in younger patients is routinely treated with platinum-based salvage chemotherapy and response is consolidated with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT). Age >45y has been associated with inferior outcomes with first-line therapy, attributable to more aggressive biology, comorbid illnesses, reduced physiologic reserve, and heightened sensitivity to toxicities of therapy. Optimal management of older patients with relapsed or refractory HL is uncertain, as the safety and efficacy of consolidative HDT/ASCT have not been well described in this population. Patient and Methods We systematically reviewed all patients age ≥50 who underwent HDT/ASCT between January 1995 and August 2013 at MSKCC for relapsed or refractory HL; age 50 was selected to enrich for higher-risk patients. All patients had achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to second-line therapy, defined by CT and either gallium or 18FDG-PET. Center standard routinely requires adequate hepatic, renal, and cardiopulmonary reserve (left ventricular ejection fraction >50%, hemoglobin-adjusted diffusion capacity >50% predicted). Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier curves, and toxicity through day 100 was assessed by chart abstraction. Toxicities were graded according to the CTCAE version 4. Results 42 patients age ≥50y were identified in a retrospective chart review of patients with relapsed or refractory HL treated with HDT/ASCT. Median age was 54.9y at transplant (range, 50.1-66.4 years old). Ten (24%) patients were ≥60y, 32 (76%) were 50-60y. At initial diagnosis, 24 patients (57%) had stage I-II disease and 18 patients (43%) had stage III-IV disease. All patients had classical HL histology. 38% of patients had primary refractory disease, 48% patients were in first relapse, and 14% had multiply relapsed disease. The most common second-line therapy was ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (78%). 32 patients (76%) had a CR to second-line therapy and proceeded to HDT/ASCT. 9 patients (21%) achieved a PR to second-line chemotherapy; of these, 2 converted to a CR with additional systemic therapy, 5 received definitive involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT), and 2 proceeded to HDT/ASCT in a PR. Patients required a mean of 2.4 days (range, 1-4) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. 18 (43%) of patients were conditioned with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and carmustine (CBV), 17 (40%) with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and total or subtotal lymphoid irradiation, 6 (14%) with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan, and 1 (2%) with melphalan and etoposide. 55% of patients also received pre-transplant a hyperfractionated IFRT boost to the site of relapsed disease. At a median follow up of 46 months post-transplant, OS and EFS were 71% and 66%, respectively. Mean transplant admission duration was 17 days with 22% of patients requiring readmission within 100 days post-transplant. Mean time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days, and mean time to platelet engraftment was 24 days; 22% of patients had delayed platelet recovery beyond 30 days post-transplant. 4 patients (10%) required intensive care for sepsis. The most common toxicities were gastrointestinal, including a combination of grade 2-3 mucositis, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea in 98% of patients. 17 pts (40%) experienced grade 3 or 4 hypoxia during the transplant admission, but persistent pneumonitis did not occur in any pt. Bacteremia occurred in 16 pts (38%), but there were no deaths due to sepsis. Transplant related mortality was 2%, with one death prior to day 100 from respiratory failure and thromboembolic stroke. Assessment of the subgroup of 10 pts >60y showed similar OS and EFS outcomes to the cohort as a whole (P=NS). Conclusions In our single center experience treating patients age ≥50y with relapsed or refractory HL, HDT/ASCT is adequately tolerated and achieves outcomes comparable to our prior published outcomes in younger patients with similar second-line therapy and conditioning regimens (patients of median age 27 experienced an OS of 83% and EFS of 68% following HDT/ASCR, at a median follow-up of 43 months). HDT/ASCT should be routinely offered to older patients with relapsed or refractory HL who are otherwise suitable candidates for autotransplantation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Effect of Autologous Transplantation on PFS2 in Myeloma Patients Receiving Front-Line Bird (clarithromycin, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5778-5778
Author(s):  
Ekta Aneja ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
Tomer M Mark ◽  
David Jayabalan ◽  
Roger Pearse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Progression Of Disease

Abstract Background: BiRd (clarithromycin, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) combination therapy yields >90% overall response rates in newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). Long term follow up of the phase II BiRd study revealed 49% of patients went on to receive autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplants (ASCT), either as consolidation or salvage. Here we evaluate progression free survival 2 (PFS2) and overall survival (OS) in our cohort of patients, and assess the impact of ASCT. Methods: Seventy-two patients with newly diagnosed MM were enrolled on the BiRd trial between Dec 2004 and Nov 2006. BiRd is lenalidomide 25mg PO daily (d1-21), clarithromycin 500mg PO BID, dexamethasone 40mg PO weekly, for 28 day cycle. Patients remained on BiRd until progression of disease, consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), or unacceptable toxicity, and all continued to be monitored through subsequent lines of therapy. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients enrolled in the BiRd trial. PFS2 was defined as the time elapsed from start of BiRd until progression of disease on 2nd line therapy. Results: With over 8 years of follow up, 6 patients remain on continuous BiRd, 28 received ASCT consolidation, and another 6 received ASCT as salvage. Nine patients died on induction therapy and the remaining patients received second line chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by no ASCT, consolidation ASCT and salvage ASCT. Median PFS2 was 98 months, 94 months, and 53 months, respectively (p<0.22). Twenty-three patients died during second line therapy. Median OS was not reached, 102 months, and 55 months respectively (p<0.92). Discussion: Advances in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma over the past decade have introduced increasing numbers of therapeutic options, improving survival considerably. While multiple myeloma is still considered an incurable disease, patients today will likely receive several lines of therapy. The contribution and timing of each option must be considered. In our cohort of patients, receiving ASCT in the salvage setting trended toward shorter PFS, however failed to reach statistical significance. Consolidation with ASCT in our patient cohort did not translate into survival advantage. The optimal timing and utility of ASCT in the era of novel agents and increasing treatment options warrants further review, and is an area of active investigation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Rossi: celgene: Speakers Bureau; millenium: Speakers Bureau. Mark:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pekle:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Coleman:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Characteristics, treatment patterns, and economic burden of patients with metastatic cervical cancer receiving systemic anticancer therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-51
Author(s):  
Xiaoyun Pan ◽  
Lincy S. Lal ◽  
John White ◽  
Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour ◽  
Christian Valencia
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Line Therapy

51 Background: In 2021, 14,480 patients are estimated to be diagnosed with cervical cancer in the US; 16% of patients are expected to have metastatic disease for whom the 5-year survival rate is 17.6% per SEER estimates. Patients with metastatic cervical cancer (mCC) are treated mainly with systemic therapy. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, demographics, treatment patterns, and economic burden of patients with mCC receiving systemic therapy. Methods: Eligible women had been diagnosed with cervical cancer, as evidenced by >2 outpatient or >1 inpatient claim in the Optum Research Database from January 2014 through January 2020. Patients were included if they had metastasis within 6 months before or after cervical cancer diagnosis, with evidence of systemic treatment on or after the latter of a claim date for cervical cancer disease or metastatic disease. The index date was the first-line treatment initiation date. Patients were required to have ≥6 months of pre-index continuous enrollment. The top 3 treatment regimens and median treatment duration by line of therapy were described. All-cause per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs (2019 US dollars), including plan and patient paid amounts, were reported for full follow-up period from first-line and second-line therapy initiation. Results: The study sample consisted of 778 patients (mean age, 59 years; commercial, 58%; Medicare Advantage, 42%). The mean (median) follow-up period was 14 (9) months. Top baseline comorbidities were diseases of the urinary system (71%) and diseases of the female genital organs (70%), and the median Charlson comorbidity index was 7. In the first line, 80% of patients received platinum-based therapy and 23% received bevacizumab (bev). Of 778 patients, only 294 (38%) received second-line therapy, with 34% receiving bev. Top first-line treatment regimens were carboplatin + paclitaxel (27%), cisplatin (21%), and bev + carboplatin + paclitaxel (10%); the median (95% CI) duration of treatment was 3.4 (3.1-3.7) months. Top second-line treatment regimens were bev + carboplatin + paclitaxel (13%), carboplatin + paclitaxel (11%), and pembrolizumab (6%); the median duration of treatment was 3.8 (3.1-4.2) months. Mean all-cause total PPPM costs were $19,519 from first-line and $22,660 second-line therapy initiation (table). Conclusions: This study indicates that real-world mCC patients have short treatment durations and significant economic burden with first-line and second-line therapy. Novel therapies associated with greater clinical benefits in patients with mCC may provide economic benefit.[Table: see text]

Efficacy of Cyclosporine Treatment in Patients with MDS.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4608-4608
Author(s):  
Alina Kokhno ◽  
Elena Parovitchnikova ◽  
Elena Mikhailova ◽  
Yulia Olshanskaya ◽  
Irina Kaplanskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Bone Marrow Failure ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) represents a heterogenous group of myeloid neoplasms characterized by abnormal differentiation and maturation of myeloid cells, bone marrow failure and genetic instability. The recent clinical and laboratory investigations suggest that MDS is closely related to diseases in which the bone marrow failure is mediated at least in part by the immune system. The are few studies concerning the of efficacy of treatment of MDS pts with cyclosporine A (CSA) but they are limited to the group of pts with bone marrow hypoplasia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of CSA treatment in MDS pts as first line or second line therapy. 48 pts with different forms of MDS were included in study. The group of first line CSA treatment included 30 pts, male-18/female-12, RA-3, RARS-1, RCMD-18, RAEB-7, RAEBt-1, 20-normal karyotype, 10-different abberations including: 5q−, 16q+, −7, 12q+, −Y, [11p+,7q−] and complex abb. Hypoplastic bone marrow was revealed in 15 pts, hyperplastic-8 pts, hypo/hyper-7 pts. Second line therapy group included 18 pts, male-9/female-9, RCMD-11, RARS-1, RAEB-5, RAEBt-1, normal karyotype-3, cytogenetic anomalies-13 (+8, 5q−,−7, +8 and complex abb.). Hypoplastic bone marrow was revealed in 12 pts, hyperplastic-4 pts, hypo/hyper-4 pts. The first line therapy consited of splenectomy in 8 pts, low doses of Ara-C-3, interferon-α-3, chemotherapy-2 and ATG-2 pts. CSA was applied at 5–10 mg/kg/day initially and then adjusted according to blood levels and toxicity. The maintenance dose was 1–3 mg/kg/day. Minimum time to response evaluation was one month. Complete response (CR) was defined as normal PB counts, BM aspirate; partial response-improvement of PB counts to 50% of normal and freedom from transfusions; stabilization-decrease of transfusion requirements and stabilization of PB counts for more then 1 month. Total response rate in first group was 60% (18 pts) with median follow up of 10 months (2–134). CR was estimated in 20% (6pts), median follow-up 72 months (44–134). 2 pts with CR are in clonal remission. 2 pts from response group developed acute leukemia (AL). 40% of pts showed no response.58% of pts without response developed RAEB or AL. 42% of pts were in stable disease and were treated with another modalities. The response rate in second group was 61% (11 pts) with median follow-up of 7 months (1–78). 22% (4 pts) achieved CR, median follow-up 60 months (43–78). 39% of pts showed no response. 71% from these pts (5) transformed to RAEB or AL. 2 pts remained in stable disease. In both groups response was registrated from 1 to 4 months from treatment initiation (median 3 months). CR was achieved in the majority of pts after 1 year of treatment. Response was achieved in 77% of pts with hypo/hyper and hypoplastic bone marrow and in 12% of pts with hyperplastic bone marrow. Overall survival was decreased in pts with more the 5% blasts in bone marrow (p=0,02 for 1st line group, p=0,075 for 2nd line group), and increased for pts with hypo and hypo/hyper bone marrow cellularity (p=0,002 for 1st line group). There was no impact of cytogenetics. We may conclude, that CSA demonstrates good efficacy in therapy of MDS pts, especially for pts with RA, RARS and RCMD with hypo and hypo/hypercellular bone marrow and reactive lymphoid nodules in bone marrow. It can be initiated as 1st or 2nd line therapy and should be continued at least for 3 months before evaluating of response.

Lenalidomide Treatment For Lower Risk Non-Deletion 5q Myelodysplastic Syndromes Patients Yields Higher Response Rates When Used Prior To Azanucleosides

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1507-1507
Author(s):  
Rami S Komrokji ◽  
Maria G. Corrales-Yepez ◽  
Najla H Al Ali ◽  
Eric Padron ◽  
Jeffrey E Lancet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Lenalidomide (LEN) is the standard of care for treatment of transfusion dependent lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with chromosome 5q deletion (del 5q). In the MDS-002 study, 26% of lower risk transfusion dependent MDS patients became red blood cell transfusion independent after LEN treatment. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical guidelines list LEN as a second line treatment alternative for transfusion dependent anemia in lower risk non-del 5q MDS after azanucleosides failure. The response rate to LEN after azanucleosides failure, however, is not known given that the MDS-002 study preceded FDA approval of azanucleosides. To address the best sequence of LEN to optimize response potential in lower risk MDS, we examined the response rates to LEN in non-del 5q lower risk MDS when offered as first line after (erythroid stimulating agents) ESA's or after azacitidine failure. Methods This was a retrospective study conducted using the Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) MDS database. We identified patients with lower risk MDS who received both LEN and azacitidine as first or second line therapy after erythroid stimulating agents. Lower risk MDS was defined according to the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) Low or intermediate-1 (int-1) risk groups. The primary endpoint was to compare rates of erythroid hematological improvement (HI-E) between the group of patients who received LEN as first line therapy followed by azacitidine as second line (LEN 1st line group) and those who received LEN as second line therapy after azacitidine (LEN 2nd line group). HI was defined according to international working group criteria (IWG 2006). Chi- square test was used for categorical variables, T-test was used for continuous variables, and Kaplan Meier estimates for overall survival. All analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software (IBM version 21) Results We identified 63 patients who received both azacitidine and LEN as first and second line where 37 patients were in group 1 (LEN 1st line) and 26 patients were in group 2 (LEN 2nd line). Baseline characteristics between the two groups are summarized in Table-1. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of mean age at diagnosis, gender, WHO subtype, revised IPSS, or mean blood counts. The majority of patients had refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD) and had low risk revised IPSS . The rate of HI-E was 38% (n=14) among LEN 1st line group compared to 12% (n=3) in LEN 2nd line group. (p=0.04). There was no difference in overall survival (OS) among the two groups with a median OS of 104 months and 87 months, respectively, p=0.55. There was no difference in AML transformation rate, 5.4% (n=2) and 11% (n=3) among the two groups, respectively, p=0.33. There were no differences in response rates to azacitidine among the two groups. Among the Len 1st line group response to 2nd line azacitidine was 38% (n=14) compared to 35% (n=9) among those who received azacitidine as first line followed by LEN as 2nd line. (p=0.69). Conclusion LEN yields a higher rate of HI-E in non-del 5q lower risk MDS when used as first line therapy. If validated in a larger cohort, LEN should be considered for 1st line therapy after ESAs rather than after azacitidine failure. Responses to azacitidine were similar among the two groups, indicating no adverse effect of LEN on azacitidine response. Disclosures: Komrokji: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: use of lenalidomide in non del 5q. Lancet:Celgene: Research Funding. List:Celgene: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document