Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Is a Feasible Treatment For Older Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3408-3408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hillary Glick ◽  
Connie Lee ◽  
Craig S. Sauter ◽  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Matthew J. Matasar
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Relapsed Disease ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Background Relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma in younger patients is routinely treated with platinum-based salvage chemotherapy and response is consolidated with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT). Age >45y has been associated with inferior outcomes with first-line therapy, attributable to more aggressive biology, comorbid illnesses, reduced physiologic reserve, and heightened sensitivity to toxicities of therapy. Optimal management of older patients with relapsed or refractory HL is uncertain, as the safety and efficacy of consolidative HDT/ASCT have not been well described in this population. Patient and Methods We systematically reviewed all patients age ≥50 who underwent HDT/ASCT between January 1995 and August 2013 at MSKCC for relapsed or refractory HL; age 50 was selected to enrich for higher-risk patients. All patients had achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to second-line therapy, defined by CT and either gallium or 18FDG-PET. Center standard routinely requires adequate hepatic, renal, and cardiopulmonary reserve (left ventricular ejection fraction >50%, hemoglobin-adjusted diffusion capacity >50% predicted). Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier curves, and toxicity through day 100 was assessed by chart abstraction. Toxicities were graded according to the CTCAE version 4. Results 42 patients age ≥50y were identified in a retrospective chart review of patients with relapsed or refractory HL treated with HDT/ASCT. Median age was 54.9y at transplant (range, 50.1-66.4 years old). Ten (24%) patients were ≥60y, 32 (76%) were 50-60y. At initial diagnosis, 24 patients (57%) had stage I-II disease and 18 patients (43%) had stage III-IV disease. All patients had classical HL histology. 38% of patients had primary refractory disease, 48% patients were in first relapse, and 14% had multiply relapsed disease. The most common second-line therapy was ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (78%). 32 patients (76%) had a CR to second-line therapy and proceeded to HDT/ASCT. 9 patients (21%) achieved a PR to second-line chemotherapy; of these, 2 converted to a CR with additional systemic therapy, 5 received definitive involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT), and 2 proceeded to HDT/ASCT in a PR. Patients required a mean of 2.4 days (range, 1-4) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. 18 (43%) of patients were conditioned with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and carmustine (CBV), 17 (40%) with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and total or subtotal lymphoid irradiation, 6 (14%) with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan, and 1 (2%) with melphalan and etoposide. 55% of patients also received pre-transplant a hyperfractionated IFRT boost to the site of relapsed disease. At a median follow up of 46 months post-transplant, OS and EFS were 71% and 66%, respectively. Mean transplant admission duration was 17 days with 22% of patients requiring readmission within 100 days post-transplant. Mean time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days, and mean time to platelet engraftment was 24 days; 22% of patients had delayed platelet recovery beyond 30 days post-transplant. 4 patients (10%) required intensive care for sepsis. The most common toxicities were gastrointestinal, including a combination of grade 2-3 mucositis, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea in 98% of patients. 17 pts (40%) experienced grade 3 or 4 hypoxia during the transplant admission, but persistent pneumonitis did not occur in any pt. Bacteremia occurred in 16 pts (38%), but there were no deaths due to sepsis. Transplant related mortality was 2%, with one death prior to day 100 from respiratory failure and thromboembolic stroke. Assessment of the subgroup of 10 pts >60y showed similar OS and EFS outcomes to the cohort as a whole (P=NS). Conclusions In our single center experience treating patients age ≥50y with relapsed or refractory HL, HDT/ASCT is adequately tolerated and achieves outcomes comparable to our prior published outcomes in younger patients with similar second-line therapy and conditioning regimens (patients of median age 27 experienced an OS of 83% and EFS of 68% following HDT/ASCR, at a median follow-up of 43 months). HDT/ASCT should be routinely offered to older patients with relapsed or refractory HL who are otherwise suitable candidates for autotransplantation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Cytarabine plus mitoxantrone versus cytarabine plus clofarabine as second-line therapy in AML.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18001-e18001
Author(s):  
Zartash Gul ◽  
Asheesh Jain ◽  
Stacey A. Slone ◽  
Ali Raufi ◽  
Emily Marie Van Meter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Bridging Strategy

e18001 Background: There are no comparative studies that can provide guidance about the choice of second line therapy in AML patients (pts). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 30 consecutive pts who underwent reinduction chemotherapy for AML with mitoxantrone and cytarabine (ACM) or cytarabine and clofarabine (ACC). Results: Baseline characteristics of the pts are described in the Table. Ten pts achieved remission after initial induction therapy in ACM group and 4 pts in ACC group (P=0.71). Median length of remission was 314 days (d) (81-874 d) in ACM group and 178.5 d (57-232 d) in ACC group (P=0.13).After reinduction in ACM and ACC groups 9 and 3 patients achieved remission respectively (P=0.4).One pt in each group underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant. After a median follow-up of 11.2 m (ACM) and 10.5m (ACC), 9 and 6 pts had died in ACM and ACC groups respectively. Causes of death were progression (ACM=2pts, ACC= 1pt), end organ failure (3 pts each) and unknown (ACM=4pts, ACC=2 pts). Median Overall survival (OS) was 18.4 months (m) in ACM and 13.1 m in ACC group (P=0.49). After reinduction therapy OS was 8.3 and 6.9 m in ACM and ACC groups (P=0.72). In our patient cohort we did not find any baseline characteristics that were associated with OS or achievement of remission after reinduction therapy. Conclusions: In our pt cohort both ACM and ACC regimens demonstrated the ability to induce remission as a possible bridging strategy to allogeniec stem cell transplant. Larger studies are needed to compare these two regimens as well as evaluate any baseline characteristics which correlate with OS or achievement of remission. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Delineation of the timing of second-line therapy post–autologous stem cell transplant in patients with AL amyloidosis

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (13) ◽  
pp. 1578-1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi L. Hwa ◽  
Rahma Warsame ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Francis K. Buadi ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Key Points

Key Points Organ progression at second-line therapy predicated inferior survival. Patients relapsing from >VGPR had a longer time to develop organ progression.

scholarly journals Inferior Survival with Use of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant As Second-Line Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2026-2026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara A. Rosenbaum ◽  
Danny Luan ◽  
Paul J Christos ◽  
Roger Pearse ◽  
Danielle Guarneri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Delayed Group

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable with eventual relapse and death occurring despite multiple lines of chemotherapy. Standard frontline therapy for MM has traditionally consisted of combinations of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and dexamethasone followed by consolidation with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). A randomized trial using IMiD and PI-based induction demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with upfront ASCT in consolidation compared to ASCT in second-line at relapse, but no OS benefit (Attal et al, NEJM, 2017). Delay of ASCT to second-line or beyond may in part be due to the aforementioned lack of OS benefit shown with upfront ASCT and increase of sustained deep responses, including MRD negativity, to novel frontline 3 and 4-drug regimens and continuation of therapy in the frontline. We performed a chart review comparing PFS1, PFS2, and overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent upfront ASCT as consolidation to those who received ASCT in the second-line after one relapse ('delayed ASCT'). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Weill Cornell Medical College. Methods: 124 MM patients who underwent ASCT either as consolidation in first-line or delayed ASCT after relapsing on one prior treatment between 2010-2016 were included. Demographics and clinical parameters were extracted from the electronic medical record. PFS1, PFS2, and OS were calculated from date of diagnosis to first relapse, second relapse, and death, respectively. Patients were censored if lost to follow-up prior to experiencing the relevant event. PFS1, PFS2, and OS of patients receiving upfront ASCT were compared to those of patients receiving delayed ASCT. Log-rank tests were used to statistically evaluate differences between Kaplan-Meier PFS/OS curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) using upfront ASCT as the reference treatment. Results: Among the 124 patients, 93 underwent upfront ASCT as consolidation and 31 underwent delayed ASCT after relapsing on one prior line of therapy (Table 1). Induction regimens and pre-transplant therapies received are detailed in Table 1. Of the delayed group patients, 6 underwent ASCT directly without second-line induction and 25 as consolidation after second-line therapy. Patients receiving upfront ASCT had significantly longer median PFS1 compared to patients who received delayed ASCT (6.45 vs 1.25 years; P<0.001), with a HR of 0.18 (95% CI, 0.11-0.29) (Figure 1A). Median PFS2 in the upfront ASCT group was likewise significantly longer than in the delayed group (9.19 vs 3.69 years; P<0.001), with a HR of 0.31 (95% CI, 0.18-0.55) (Figure 1B). With a median follow-up of 6.0 and 5.8 years in the upfront and delayed groups, respectively, median OS was not reached in either group but trended towards prolonged survival with upfront ASCT (P=0.052), with a HR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.20 to 1.03) (Figure 1C). Conclusions: In this cohort of 124 MM patients undergoing ASCT as consolidation in the upfront setting or delayed ASCT in second-line after relapse, upfront ASCT was associated with significantly improved PFS1 and PFS2, similar to findings by Attal et al. However, in that study, no difference in OS was seen between upfront and delayed groups, while our data, with longer follow-up, showed median OS trending towards significance. This has important implications as with use of novel induction regimens and maintenance therapy, ASCT is more commonly being delayed to early relapse in second-line or beyond. If transplant is intended to be used in the first few lines of therapy, our data show that delaying ASCT even to second-line has a significant negative impact on PFS. In addition, a shorter OS with delayed transplant was suggested although did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to small numbers or more patients with high-risk MM in the delayed group. It is also important to note the lack of daratumumab-based regimens which may have improved PFS/OS in either or both arms. Thus, our findings should be prospectively validated in a larger trial of ASCT as consolidation in first-line vs second-line or beyond using novel, monoclonal antibody-based regimens. Disclosures Rosenbaum: Janssen: Research Funding; Honoraria Akcea: Other: Accordant Health. Coleman:Gilead, Bayer, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau. Van Besien:Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Niesvizky:Takeda, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Outcomes and Treatments of Relapsed AL Amyloidosis Following Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1858-1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahma Warsame ◽  
Soo-Mee Bang ◽  
Shaji K. Kumar ◽  
Martha Q Lacy ◽  
Francis K Buadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Abstract 1858 Systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) is a condition where clonal plasma cells produce misfolded insoluble immunoglobulin light chains that deposit in various organs causing progressive organ dysfunction. Chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) when eligible is the standard treatment options for patients with AL amyloidosis. There are several studies who report long term outcomes of patient post ASCT. However, there is a paucity of literature describing the outcomes of patients who have received ASCT but have relapsed. We performed a retrospective study to assess the outcomes and treatment regimens employed following relapse after ASCT. Between 1996 and 2009, 410 patients received ASCT at the Mayo Clinic as first line therapy. Of those 410 patients 42 patients died within 3 months of transplant, 64 patients died without documented relapse, 158 patients were alive without documented progression, and 146 patients had documented progression. Those 146 patients are the subject of our study. The median time to hematologic relapse was 2 years (range: 0.2–15.5 years). At relapse, 59 patients were treated with IMiD based therapy, 36 with alkylator based therapy, 24 with bortezomib, 15 with steroids, and 5 with second ASCT. The respective hematologic response rates were 58%, 33%, 50%, 53%, and 60%. The remaining six patients were not evaluable for response for one other following reasons: organ transplants; no further therapy; inevaluable disease. With a median post relapse follow up of 3.6 years, the median overall survival (OS) from the first post ASCT relapse was 4.6 years. The median post transplant follow up was 6.1 years, the median OS for these patients was 7.3 years from the time of transplant. These data provide novel information about outcomes after SCT relapse, which should be useful not only for patients and doctors but also for investigators designing studies for salvage therapies post-transplant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Practice Patterns of Re-Initiation of Therapy at Time of Relapse or Progression Post- Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) Among Patients with AL Amyloidosis

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3444-3444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi L. Hwa ◽  
Rahma Warsame ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Francis K Buadi ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background: Among patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, there is little consensus on when reinstitution of chemotherapy should occur (Milani and Dispenzieri, International Society of Amyloidosis 2016). AL amyloidosis patients who are treated with high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) are a relatively low-risk and homogenous population, making them an ideal group to study practice patterns. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the patterns of relapse or progression and the timing of re-initiation of therapy among 146 patients who were initially treated with ASCT at Mayo Clinic between 1996 and 2009 and who received second-line therapy between 7/9/1997 and 4/12/2012. Results: The median time from ASCT to second-line therapy was 23.6 months and the median follow up post ASCT was 57.5 months. The indications for second-line treatment were: 1) both hematologic and organ progression 24.7% (36 patients); 2) organ progression only 41.1% (60); 3) hematologic relapse only 34.2% (50). The median dFLC at the time of starting second-line therapy was 10.5 mg/dL (1.6 - 59.5 mg/dL), which was 44.9% (13.8-167.2%) of dFLC level at diagnosis. Increase in proteinuria by > 50% from nadir (that was also at least 1g/24 hours, i.e. renal progression) was present in 35.8%. Increase in NT proBNP by >30% from nadir and minimum of 300 pg/mL was present in 48.9% of patients. The respective 4 years overall survival rates from the time of ASCT were 87.8%, 63.9%, and 56.7% (p=0.0016) for patients who had hematologic relapse, organ progression only and both organ and hematologic progression. Comparisons of laboratory markers at diagnosis, nadir of post ASCT and initiation of second-line therapy are listed in the table. Conclusions: Our study investigated the patterns of relapse / progression following upfront ASCT. This provides some insights on practice patterns of when physicians re-initiate therapy. Table Table. Disclosures Gertz: NCI Frederick: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Med Learning Group: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Research to Practice: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Prothena Therapeutics: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Sandoz Inc: Honoraria; Ionis: Research Funding; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Annexon Biosciences: Research Funding. Kumar:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kesios: Consultancy. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; pfizer: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Life after Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, & Rituximab (FCR) - the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Who Receive Salvage Treatment after Frontline FCR.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2090-2090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantine S. Tam ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Susan Lerner ◽  
Issa F Khouri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract The FCR regimen is the most active treatment program in CLL, with 72% of frontline patients achieving a complete remission (CR) lasting a median of 7 years. However, most patients are not cured and will eventually relapse with CLL. In order to evaluate how these patients should be subsequently managed, we analyzed our institutional experience with 300 patients treated with frontline FCR (Blood 112:975). After a median follow-up of 6 years, 116 patients (39%) had failed FCR therapy with 13 primary refractory disease and 103 relapses from partial remission (PR), nodular PR (nPR) or CR. Compared with patients in ongoing remission, relapsed/refractory patients had more adverse baseline characteristics including a greater proportion with performance status ≥ 1 (71% vs 53% p=0.002), elevated β2m (54% vs 36% p=0.002), white cell count ≥ 150 x 10^9/L (25% vs 12% p=0.003), unmutated IgVH (81% vs 44% p&lt;0.001) and ZAP-70 positivity (78% vs 49% p&lt;0.001). The aim of the current analysis was to determine the duration of survival (OS) following second-line therapy in 97 patients who had completed salvage treatment. The median follow-up was 32 (range 3 – 69) months, and the median OS (mOS) was 32 months. Characteristics associated with favorable OS were: (1) previous best response to FCR of nPR/CR lasting ≥ 18 months (mOS 47 months, vs 13 months for primary refractory disease, PR or nPR/CR lasting &lt;18 months p=0.002); (2) β2m &lt; 3.0 mg/L (mOS not reached, vs 17 months p=0.0003) and (3) platelets ≥ 100x10^9/L (mOS 47 months, vs 15 months p=0.004). Poor risk cytogenetic abnormalities were common at FCR failure: among 38 assessable patients, 7 (18%) had 17p- and 18 (47%) had 11q- by conventional karyotyping and/or FISH. Although patients with 17p- or 11q- had an inferior survival, this survival disadvantage was confined entirely to those who also had an elevated β2m ≥ 3.0 mg/L. Surprisingly, patients relapsing after durable FCR remissions (≥ 5 years) and patients with slowly progressive relapse (time to salvage ≥ 12 months after FCR failure) had similar OS as their more adverse counterparts (p=0.76 and 0.86 respectively). A prognostic model comprising β2m and platelet count effectively divided patients into low, intermediate and high risk categories with mOS of &gt;45, 32 and 13 months respectively (p&lt;0.0001). Patients received treatment chosen at the discretion of individual treating physicians and the CR rate of second-line therapy were: FCR (n=30), 17%; rituximab (n=25), 4%; alemtuzumab ± rituximab (n=16), 31%; FCR & alemtuzumab (CFAR, n=9), 56%; lymphoma-type chemotherapy (n=5), 0%; other treatment (n=12), 0%. The CR rate for CFAR was significantly higher than that of FCR (p=0.03), although the median remission duration (30 vs 20 months) and OS (44 vs 32 months) were similar (p=0.87 and 0.51 respectively). None of the regimens showed a significant survival benefit. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) was performed in 27 (28%) patients at a median of 15 months after first salvage. Patients receiving SCT had a significantly superior OS than those who did not undergo SCT (not reached vs 30 months, p=0.03). Of the 14 patients surviving for more than four years, 11 (79%) had undergone a SCT. Patients who fail FCR therapy had high risk disease features including elevated β2m, unmutated IgVH and ZAP-70 positivity, and most had adverse cytogenetic findings at relapse. Results of salvage therapy in this group were poor with a median survival of less than three years. The majority of long-term survivors had received allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Relapsed and Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Keeping Pace With Novel Agents and New Options for Salvage Therapy

2019 ◽  
pp. 477-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison J. Moskowitz ◽  
Alex F. Herrera ◽  
Anne W. Beaven
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

The management of relapsed and refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has changed substantially since the approval of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab. For patients progressing after frontline treatment, second-line therapy followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the standard of care; however, although traditional combination chemotherapy regimens previously represented the only options for salvage, BV is now routinely incorporated into second-line therapy, and studies are evaluating checkpoint inhibitors in this setting as well. After ASCT, BV maintenance improves progression-free survival for patients at higher-risk, and studies are evaluating the role of post-ASCT maintenance with checkpoint inhibitors. Management of HL that progresses after ASCT remains a challenge. Although many patients achieve prolonged disease control with checkpoint inhibitors, the majority eventually progress and require additional therapy. Newer approaches, including CD30-directed chimeric antigen receptor–T-cell therapy, appear promising. Furthermore, allogeneic stem cell transplant remains an important consideration. Altogether, BV and checkpoint inhibitors have improved survival for patients with relapsed and refractory HL. However, the ideal place for these drugs in the treatment course of HL is still under investigation. Ongoing studies testing novel combinations and assessing for prognostic and predictive markers will ultimately define the optimal setting for these drugs in the treatment of relapsed and refractory HL.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Daratumumab Containing Regimens Post Lenalidomide Maintenance in Transplant Eligible Patients: Real-World Experience from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 26-27
Author(s):  
Hira S Mian ◽  
Christine Eisfeld ◽  
Christopher P. Venner ◽  
Victor Jimenez-Zepeda ◽  
Cyrus Khandanpour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Group ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line

Introduction Lenalidomide maintenance following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a standard of care among transplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Many previous clinical trials done in patients following one prior line of therapy either excluded patients progressing on lenalidomide or included a very small proportion of these patients. Given the paucity of data in this setting, the optimal management of patients progressing on lenalidomide maintenance remains unknown. Daratumumab-containing triplet regimens have recently been introduced for these patients, typically in combination with pomalidomide (DPd), lenalidomide (DRd), or bortezomib (DVd). To our knowledge, there is no prospective data to allow comparison of the efficacy of these three regimens in patients progressing on lenalidomide maintenance, which is an increasingly common clinical scenario. Understanding the comparative efficacy, tolerability and toxicity of these regimens in patients progressing on lenalidomide maintenance in the 'real-world' is needed in order to help clinicians make appropriate decisions and guide future studies. Methods The Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database (formerly known as the Myeloma Canada Research Network Database, MCRN-DB) is a prospectively maintained disease specific database with over 7000 patients enrolled from 14 academic sites across Canada with legacy data collected from 2007. The Munster Myeloma database collects myeloma specific information in a German academic center and currently contains data from 800 patients collected from 2005. All consecutive patients treated with daratumumab based regimens in second line following relapse on lenalidomide maintenance were included in the analysis from the two databases analyzed up to 30/06/2020. Results A total of 1380 NDMM patients on lenalidomide maintenance post autologous stem cell transplant were identified in the two databases. From them, 73 patients were included in this analysis as they were treated with daratumumab containing regimen in second line. Specifically, 18 (24.7%) of these patients were treated with DPd, 32 (43.8%) patients with DRd, and 23 (31.5%) patients with DVd. The baseline characteristics, maintenance details, post-maintenance response rates and toxicity for each regimen are shown in Table 1. The median follow-up for the cohort from the time of daratumumab initiation was 8.3 months (range 0.4 - 40.0). Although, a higher proportion of patients in the DPd arm obtained a CR/VGPR compared to DRd or DVd, it did not reach statistical significance (p-value 0.06). The median PFS of the entire cohort was 16.96 months (95% CI 11.47-23.44). The median PFS of the individual regimens was as follows: DPd 17.65 months, DRd not reached and DVd 11.47 months as demonstrated in Figure 1 (p-value =0.46). Conclusion In summary, our results show that daratumumab-based regimens are effective among patients progressing on lenalidomide maintenance in the real world. Despite the small sample size, the results presented here are in line with recent sub-analyses of phase III studies examining the common daratumumab-based regimens used in this setting (CASTOR with median PFS of DVd between 7.8 months in all lenalidomide refractory patients and 27 months in all patients in first relapse; MM014 with median PFS of DPd after lenalidomide refractoriness of 21.8 months). The efficacy of DRd, in which daratumumab is added to an increased dose of lenalidomide, is notable and warrants further evaluation to identify which patients are most likely to benefit. Additional studies with longer follow-up are required to assess the optimal daratumumab-based regimen to be used in this growing population of patients relapsing after lenalidomide maintenance. Disclosures Mian: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy. Venner:Celgene, Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Sanofi, Takeda, Amgen: Honoraria. Jimenez-Zepeda:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria. McCurdy:Sanofi: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sebag:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Song:Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria. Leblanc:Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene Canada; Janssen Inc.; Amgen Canada; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. White:Karyopharm: Honoraria; Antengene: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Stakiw:Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Louzada:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kotb:Karyopharm: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Reece:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding.

The Outcome of Different Types of Second-Line Therapy in Multiple Myeloma Patients Relapsing After Uniform Front-Line Treatment with High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2892-2892
Author(s):  
Claudia Crippa ◽  
Samantha Ferrari ◽  
Monica Drera ◽  
Marinella Calarco ◽  
Antonio Regazzoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Abstract 2892 Poster Board II-868 Background and aim. While multiple myeloma (MM) still remains largely incurable, therapeutic options for patients with MM are expanding. However the best way to use the different effective regimens, either in combination or in sequence, during the course of MM in the single patient is still unknown. Data from controlled studies rarely report the treatments received before and after the enrollment of patients in the clinical trial, which may significantly impact on response and survival. As an example, the best treatment for patients relapsing after first-line high-dose melphalan (HD-Mel) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is not standardized. To this end we have retrospectively analyzed an uniform cohort of such patients treated at our Institution, comparing their outcome according to the type of second-line and further consolidation treatment received. Patients and methods. In 156 patients affected by MM and treated between 1997 and 2008 with HD-Mel and ASCT as first line therapy, relapse has occurred in 92 (59%). Females were 39 (42%), males 53 (58%), median age was 60 (range 34-75). As induction therapy before ASCT, 89 (97%) had received VAD regimen, and only 3 (3%) thalidomide/bortezomib-based regimen. Sixty-one patients (66%) had received a single ASCT and 31 a double ASCT (34%). A second-line therapy was given to 87/92 patients. They were subdivided in 3 subgroups according to the type of second-line treatment received: 1) thalidomide-based regimens (THAL) were given to 55 pts (63%) followed by a consolidation ASCT in 13 (24%) 2) bortezomib-based regimens (BORT) were used in 13 (15%) and subsequent ASCT in 3 of them (23%) 3) chemotherapy and/or steroids (CHEMO) were used in 19 (22%) followed by ASCT in 15 (79%). Median follow-up from diagnosis was 57 (13-145) in THAL, 39 (17-140) in BORT and 59 months (25-113) in CHEMO respectively. The baseline characteristics, including age, of the three subgroups were similar as well as the CR/VGPR and ORR rates obtained after first-line treatment (THAL 47% and 87%; BORT 69% and 100%; CHEMO 53% and 100%, respectively). The subgroups also did not differ in median duration of first response, which ranged from 13 to 15 months and median time to second treatment, which was 26 months in all subgroups. The proportion of patients receiving a double ASCT were significantly higher in BORT (69%) compared to THAL (34%) (P=0.03) and CHEMO (5%) (p=0.002), and in THAL (34%) compared to CHEMO (5%) (p=0.015). Results. After second line therapy the ORR (CR+VGPR+ PR) of the three subgroups was: THAL 60%, BORT 77% and CHEMO 58%. (p=NS). The second CR/VGPR rate was non significantly higher after BORT (46%) than after THAL (25%) or CHEMO (21%) (p=0.17). Moreover, when considering patients not undergoing second-line consolidation ASCT, the ORR was significantly better in THAL and BORT subgroups compared to CHEMO (50%, 70% and 0%, respectively p=0.03). After a median follow-up from second-line treatment of 28 months (range 1-99), the 2-y PFS was 38% after THAL (median 18 months), 34% after BORT (median 16 months) and 17% after CHEMO (median 12 months) (p=NS). The 2-y OS was 78% (median 49 months), 70% (median not reached), and 70% (median 33 month) after THAL, BORT and CHEMO, respectively (p=NS). However when considering patients not undergoing second-line consolidation ASCT, the 2-y OS was significantly better after THAL and BORT than after CHEMO (p=0.024). Conclusion. In spite of having frequently received a first-line double ASCT, BORT patients seemed to achieve responses of better quality. However, in patients relapsing after first-line HD-Mel and ASCT, the choice of THAL, BORT or CHEMO-based regimens as second-line therapy did not seem to impact on overall response rates and survival, provided that patients treated with CHEMO could be consolidated with a second ASCT. Hence newer drugs may be reserved for those patients not fit for ASCT, preserving them for effective third-line treatment in the other patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Characteristics, treatment patterns, and economic burden of patients with metastatic cervical cancer receiving systemic anticancer therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-51
Author(s):  
Xiaoyun Pan ◽  
Lincy S. Lal ◽  
John White ◽  
Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour ◽  
Christian Valencia
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Line Therapy

51 Background: In 2021, 14,480 patients are estimated to be diagnosed with cervical cancer in the US; 16% of patients are expected to have metastatic disease for whom the 5-year survival rate is 17.6% per SEER estimates. Patients with metastatic cervical cancer (mCC) are treated mainly with systemic therapy. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, demographics, treatment patterns, and economic burden of patients with mCC receiving systemic therapy. Methods: Eligible women had been diagnosed with cervical cancer, as evidenced by >2 outpatient or >1 inpatient claim in the Optum Research Database from January 2014 through January 2020. Patients were included if they had metastasis within 6 months before or after cervical cancer diagnosis, with evidence of systemic treatment on or after the latter of a claim date for cervical cancer disease or metastatic disease. The index date was the first-line treatment initiation date. Patients were required to have ≥6 months of pre-index continuous enrollment. The top 3 treatment regimens and median treatment duration by line of therapy were described. All-cause per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs (2019 US dollars), including plan and patient paid amounts, were reported for full follow-up period from first-line and second-line therapy initiation. Results: The study sample consisted of 778 patients (mean age, 59 years; commercial, 58%; Medicare Advantage, 42%). The mean (median) follow-up period was 14 (9) months. Top baseline comorbidities were diseases of the urinary system (71%) and diseases of the female genital organs (70%), and the median Charlson comorbidity index was 7. In the first line, 80% of patients received platinum-based therapy and 23% received bevacizumab (bev). Of 778 patients, only 294 (38%) received second-line therapy, with 34% receiving bev. Top first-line treatment regimens were carboplatin + paclitaxel (27%), cisplatin (21%), and bev + carboplatin + paclitaxel (10%); the median (95% CI) duration of treatment was 3.4 (3.1-3.7) months. Top second-line treatment regimens were bev + carboplatin + paclitaxel (13%), carboplatin + paclitaxel (11%), and pembrolizumab (6%); the median duration of treatment was 3.8 (3.1-4.2) months. Mean all-cause total PPPM costs were $19,519 from first-line and $22,660 second-line therapy initiation (table). Conclusions: This study indicates that real-world mCC patients have short treatment durations and significant economic burden with first-line and second-line therapy. Novel therapies associated with greater clinical benefits in patients with mCC may provide economic benefit.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document