scholarly journals A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Primary Prophylaxis with Weekly Alendronate Against Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Lymphoma Patients Treated with Steroid-Containing Chemotherapy.

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 456-456
Author(s):  
Paw Jensen ◽  
Lasse H. Jakobsen ◽  
Martin Bøgsted ◽  
Joachim Baech ◽  
Simon Lykkeboe ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Many lymphoma patients receive high doses of glucocorticoids as part of standard therapy, and several recent observational studies have highlighted a possible risk of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) and excess bone fracture risk. As a substantial fraction of lymphoma patients become long-term survivors, studies that focus on mitigating the negative effects of treatment toxicities on survivorship are important. The objective of the SIESTA trial was to determine if primary prophylaxis with oral alendronate (ALN) is safe and effective against (GIO) in lymphoma patients. Methods: SIESTA was a single-center randomized and double-blinded phase 2 study performed at the Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, enrolling lymphoma patients that were planned for glucocorticoid-containing chemotherapy regimens such as (R-)CVP and all variants of (R)-CHOP. Patients were randomized to weekly oral ALN 70mg or placebo with a treatment duration of 52 weeks. Study assessments included bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at baseline, after completion of chemotherapy at 4-6 months (EOT), and after 12 months, as well as vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) at baseline and at 12 months. The primary study endpoint was change in lumbar spine T-score from baseline to 12 months. Key secondary endpoints were change in T-score from baseline to 12 months at total hip and femoral neck levels, vertebral compression fractures and early T-score changes. Biomarker analyses were exploratory. The target recruitment was 60 patients in a three-year period. Results: A total of 59 patients (36 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 15 follicular lymphoma, 8 other) were enrolled with 22 of 30 patients in the ALN arm and 23 of 29 patients in the placebo arm completing the study (efficacy group). Patient characteristics in the two arms were balanced with exception of more advanced stage diseases (Ann Arbor stage III-IV) in the ALN arm (70·0% vs 41·4%), and a lower median baseline T-score at the lumbar spine in the ALN arm (median T-score -0·6 vs 1·0). Patients in the ALN group received a median of 3,291 mg prednisone versus 3,398 mg for the placebo group. Median change in T-score from baseline to 12 months at the lumbar spine level (primary endpoint) was +0·2 for the ALN arm and -0·2 for the placebo arm (P=0·013) (figure 1), with stronger effect for female patients (median change; ALN +0·25; placebo -0·25) (figure 2). ALN had no effect on BMD for total hip (P=0·30) and femoral neck (P=0·58) at 12 months (figure 1). ALN had no significant early effects on BMD for any measured sites (4-6 months). No new fractures were observed. Nine patients experienced AEs related to the upper gastro-intestinal (GI) system (7 grade 1-2, 2 grade 3-4) with 5 AEs being assessed as related to the study treatment (3 in the ALN group and 2 in the placebo group). One patient (placebo group) discontinued study treatment due to upper GI AE (bleeding ulcer). Biomarker analyses (C-terminal telopeptide cross links (CTX) as marker of bone resorption and N-terminal propeptides of collagen type 1 (P1NP) as marker for bone formation) showed reduced bone resorption for ALN treated patients opposed to the placebo treated patients. From baseline to EOT the mean change in CTX was -0.17 in the ALN group and 0.10 in the placebo group respectively (P<0.001). From baseline to 12 months the mean change in CTX was -0.19 in the ALN group and 0.00 in the placebo group respectively (P=0.002). Interpretation: ALN was a safe and effective primary prophylaxis against GIO in lymphoma patients planned for glucocorticoid-containing chemotherapy regimens. The treatment effects were clinically meaningful across all patient subgroups, but the largest effect size was observed in females. Biomarker analyses supported reduced bone resorption for ALN treated patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Vestergaard: Novo Nordisk Foundation: Other: Head of Research at Steno Diabetes Center North Jutland funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Research Funding. El-Galaly: Abbvie: Other: Speakers fee; ROCHE Ltd: Ended employment in the past 24 months.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4282-4282
Author(s):  
Gian Luca Forni ◽  
Silverio Perrotta ◽  
Caterina Borgna Pignatti ◽  
Domenico Giuseppe D'Ascola ◽  
Bruno Nobili ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4282 A high percentage (90%) of patients with β- Thalassemia Major suffers from osteopenia or osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of NE on Thalassemia-induced osteoporosis. NE is an aminobisphosfonate which has been proved to inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. It has been already used in the treatment of several bone disorders such as Paget's disease and Osteogenesis Imperfecta. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. NTC01140321. Male and female patients (> 18 years) with transfusion dependent β- Thalassemia who had a BMD Z score <-2 at the level of the femoral neck or of the lumbar column and received regular transfusions in order to maintain pre-transfusional Hb values >9 g/dl were eligible. Exclusion criteria were: Thalassemia Intermedia if not regularly transfused; pregnancy and breast feeding; impaired renal function (creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl); neoplastic disease; mean levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 300 U/l and variations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or AST of 300% within the year before randomization (at least 4 assessments over 12 months); systemic cardiovascular, renal, hepatic disease which would prevent the patient from undergoing the study treatment; hypoparathyroidism; Thalassemia Intermedia occasionally transfused; known hypersensibility to bisphosphonates. If di-bisphosphonates iv within the past 2 years or of bisphosphonates per os had been administered, a wash out period (1 year if >8 weeks <48 weeks; 6 months if > 2 weeks and <8 weeks) was necessary before entering the trial. The trial was approved by the Coordinating Centre Ethics Committee (EC) at E.O. Ospedali Galliera in Genoa, Italy and the local EC at each participating Centre. All participants gave written informed consent before entering the study. 118 patients (51 males and 67 females) were randomized in two groups: group A (n=54) treated with NE 100 mg iv every 90 days plus 500 mg of calcium/400 UI of vitamin D daily; group B (n=64) treated with 500 mg of calcium/400 UI of vitamin D daily. The 2 groups were homogeneous at baseline with respect to age and gender. Efficacy and safety of NE were monitored via monthly Blood Cells Count, creatinine, BUN, AST, ALT, Ca, P, proteins electrophoresis, total protein readings. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck was performed at baseline and at month 6 and 12. Serum levels of bone alkaline phosphatase (bALP) and C-telopeptide of collagen type-I (CTX) and pain scores (questions 7 and 8 of SF-36 Questionnaire) were assessed at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after the start of the treatment. The mean increase of the lumbar spine BMD after 12 months was 3.3 % in group A and 0.2 % in group B, with an highly significant difference (p=0.003). After 6 months, the mean changes in lumbar spine BMD were 3.2 % and 0.1 % in group A and B respectively (p<0.001). The comparison between group A and group B showed a significant mean percent increase of the BMD in total hip and in the femoral neck (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively). Changes in bALP and CTX became significant as early as 3 months after the first administration in group A (p=0.015 and p<0.001, respectively), while in group B there was a borderline significance only for CTX (p = 0.048) after 3 months. Concerning question 7 of the SF-36 (physical pain in the last 4 weeks), the reduction was statistically significant after 6 months in group A (p=0.008). This result was confirmed after 12 months (p=0.001). Question 8 (pain that has hindered the usual work in the last 4 weeks) showed earlier significant reduction from the third month. One patient of group A dropped out after 6 months because of multiple fractures as a result of a traffic accident. Finally, hematologic and haematochemical and biochemical analyses did not show any clinically relevant variations. Statistically significant changes, although within the normal range, were reported for PTH, calcemia and calciuria in group A, and PTH and BUN in group B. This is the largest randomized trial designed to treat Thalassemia induced osteoporosis. NE, at the dose of 100 mg, iv, every 3 months was shown to be safe and effective both in reducing bone resorption and increasing BMD. Moreover it was shown to be effective in reducing back pain and it has a clinically manageable safety profile at a very affordable price and, being administered once every three months does not interfere with the life of patients already burdened with many treatments. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-141
Author(s):  
Samira Sharmin ◽  
Mabubul Haque ◽  
Syedur Rahman Miah ◽  
Md Mahbub Ur Rahman ◽  
Jasmine Ara Haque ◽  
...  

Objectives: Low bone mass is a common disorder in elderly population which predisposes to fracture with minimal trauma. This study was performed to find out the association between the Body Mass Index (BMI) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in postmenopausal women.Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out at Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences Comilla and Mitford, Dhaka over a period of 12 months from January 2013 to December 2013. A total 93 postmenopausal women were enrolled for this study. All postmenopausal women underwent a BMD scan of femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae using a Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA). Participants were categorized into three groups according to their age and BMI. BMD were expressed base on T-score according to WHO criteria. The relation among BMI, age and BMD were assessed.Results: The results of this study showed that the mean age of the study group was 57.13±7.49 years with range of 46 to 75 years. The most postmenopausal women were in age group 55-65years. The mean BMI of the study subjects were 24.18±5.08 kg/m2 with a range of 15.62 to 36.20 kg/m2. Among 93 subjects osteopenia was greater at lumbar spine (45.2%) with T-score mean±SD-1.83±0.33 and osteoporosis at femoral neck (51.6%) with T-score mean ±SD-3.36±-0.67. Pearson’s correlation coefficient test showed inverse relationship between age and BMD both lumbar spine (r = -0.301, p = 0.003) and femoral neck (r = -0.303, p=0.003) whereas the positive relation between BMI and BMD both at lumbar spine (r=0.338, p=0.001) and femoral neck (r =0.343, p=0.001). These showed that with advancing age, BMD decreases and the risk of osteoporosis increases and with increasing BMI, BMD increases and risk of osteoporosis decreases.Conclusion: The findings of this study portrait that aging and low BMI are risk factors associated with bone loss. So preventive measure should be taken for high risk post menopausal women.Bangladesh J. Nuclear Med. 17(2): 138-141, July 2014


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Yamaguchi ◽  
Takayoshi Morita ◽  
Atsushi Kumanogoh

Abstract Objective Prevention of steroidal osteoporosis is an important issue. There is no clear consensus on the impact of anti-RANKL antibody (denosumab) on BMD in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of denosumab on BMD loss in patients with GIO. Methods A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar were used to search for original studies reported about BMD in patients with GIO treated with denosumab. In meta-analysis of BMD, the mean difference in the rate of change from baseline and the 95% CI were calculated using the random effects model. The mean differences in patients treated with denosumab were compared with those in patients treated with bisphosphonates. Results Out of 713 studies identified, seven studies met the selection criteria for the meta-analysis. At 6 and 12 months of denosumab therapy, increases in BMD were observed in the lumbar spine (2.99% [95% CI 2.71, 3.28] and 4.59% [95% CI 4.17, 5.01]), total hip (1.34% [95% CI 0.64, 2.04] and 2.16% [95% CI 2.05, 2.27]) and femoral neck (0.12% [95% CI −0.38, 0.62] and 1.55% [95% CI 0.45, 2.65]). Additionally, denosumab resulted in significant increases in BMD in the lumbar spine and femoral neck at 12 months compared with bisphosphonate therapy. Conclusion Patients with GIO experienced significant increases in BMD in response to treatment with denosumab that were detected in the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck at 12 months.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonori Kobayakawa ◽  
Akiko Miyazaki ◽  
Makoto Saito ◽  
Takako Suzuki ◽  
Yukio Nakamura ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Denosumab and romosozumab, the recently approved new drug, are effective and widely known molecular-targeted drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment. However, no studies have directly compared their therapeutic effects or safety in postmenopausal osteoporosis. We believe the data evaluating the efficacy of each drug might be strong ground for further osteoporosis treatment. METHODS This retrospective observational registry study compared the efficacy of 12-month denosumab or romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. The primary outcome was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine. Secondary outcomes included BMD changes at the total hip and femoral neck, changes in bone turnover markers, and adverse events. Propensity score matching was employed to assemble patient groups with similar baseline characteristics. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients each received either denosumab or romosozumab for 12 months. The mean 12-month percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD was 7.2% in the denosumab group and 12.5% in the romosozumab group, indicating a significant difference between the groups. The percentage changes in BMD at both the total hip and femoral neck were also significantly higher at 12 months in the romosozumab group than in the denosumab group. In denosumab patients, bone formation and bone resorption markers were significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months from baseline. In the romosozumab group, the bone formation marker was significantly increased at 6 months and then returned to baseline, while the bone resorption marker was significantly decreased at both time points. Adverse events were few and predominantly minor in both groups. CONCLUSION Romosozumab showed a higher potential for improving BMD than denosumab in this clinical study of postmenopausal osteoporosis patient treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1179.1-1179
Author(s):  
C. Plurien ◽  
D. Mulleman ◽  
D. Chu Miow Lin ◽  
E. Salame ◽  
P. Goupille ◽  
...  

Background:Bone fragility is frequent in patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for severe liver disease, leading to a high prevalence of fractures, particularly vertebral ones. During the year following OLT, there is an early decrease in bone density and a high incidence of new vertebral fractures (VF).Objectives:To determine the prevalence of VF due to bone fragility during the year after OLT in a large population of patients.Methods:We conducted a cohort, prospective, descriptive, monocentric study including all the patients with severe chronic liver disease and awaiting OLT. Patients were seen during the pre-transplant period and one year after OLT. At each visit demographic, clinical, biological (including bone remodeling markers) and bone mineral density (BMD) data with VFA (Vertebral fracture Assessment) were collected. We estimated the incidence of VF after OLT. We compared biological and morphological data.Results:We have seen 272 patients before OLT (median age 59 years [Interquartile Range IQR: 53; 64], 75% male). Hepatopathy was due to alcoholic disease for 187 patients (69%). Before OLT, 12% had T-score<-2.5 SD (Standard Deviation) at lumbar spine site, 10% at total hip site and 10% at femoral neck site. Among the 272 patients, 31 had at least one VF (for a total of 49 VF). After OLT, we have seen 101 patients (median of 14 months [IQR: 5; 40] after OLT). For those 101 patients seen before and after OLT: we noted 18 VF for 12 patients (11.8%) before OLT and 29 VF for 18 patients (17.8%) after OLT on VFA. The VF incidence was 8.8 for 100 patients-years. During the year following OLT, there was a significant decrease of T-score at femoral neck and total hip sites. The number of osteoporotic patients was 13/101 (12.8%) at femoral neck and 14/101 (13.8%) at total hip. There was no significant change at the lumbar spine. Bone remodeling markers were significantly higher after OLT than before: CTX (μg/L) from 0.350 [IQR: 0.260; 0.501] before OLT to 0.490 [IQR: 0.279; 0.762] after OLT and osteocalcin (mg/mL) from 17 [IQR: 12; 22] to 30 [IQR: 19; 43], p<0.001. Fifteen of those 101 patients had an anti-osteoporotic drug prescribed before OLT despite being justified for 30 patients.Conclusion:Despite bone fragility and a high fracture risk, patients undergoing OLT are not enough treated for osteoporotic disease. It seems justified to offer a systematic rheumatology visit to detect bone damage before OLT and 6 months after OLT when the damage is the most significant. The drug prescription should be systematically proposed in a situation of fracture before OLT and/or in case of low bone parameters after OLT.References:[1]Krol CG, et al. Longitudinal Changes in BMD and Fracture Risk in Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients Not Using Bone-Modifying Treatment. J Bone Miner Res 2014;29(8):1763‑9.[2]Butin S, et al. High incidence of vertebral osteoporotic fracture within the first year after liver transplantation. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2017;35(6):913‑8.Acknowledgments:Elsa Cattelain-Lopez; Fabienne Chalier; Nelly Jaccaz-ValleeDisclosure of Interests:Chloe Plurien: None declared, Denis Mulleman Grant/research support from: Non-governmental organisation Lions Club Tours Val de France, French Society for Rheumatology., Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis., Delphine Chu Miow Lin: None declared, Ephrem Salame: None declared, Philippe Goupille Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Isabelle Griffoul: None declared


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4989-4989
Author(s):  
Tamara Berno ◽  
Kenneth Boucher ◽  
Fenghuang Zhan ◽  
Guido J. Tricot ◽  
Benjamin Mughal ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4989 Background: Bone disease is present at diagnosis in almost all patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and can impact substantially on patient morbidity and quality of life. Decreased bone mineral density is also observed not only in MM but also in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). The pathogenesis of bone disease in MM is complex. The activity of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has been linked to increased bone formation and osteoblastic activation. Evidence from the available clinical data indicates that bortezomib has a positive impact on bone health in MM and demonstrates a bone anabolic effect. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively 53 patients with MM and 16 with MGUS who have completed bone density at least at diagnosis. 21 patients have completed two bone density (3 MGUS and 18 MM). The bone density was obtained in all patients at baseline and in 16 patients repeated after bortezomib treatement with a median time of bortezomib exposure of 6 months. We analyzed T-score values at lumbar spine and at femoral neck. Results: With a median age of 66 years, 41 male and 28 female were analyzed. At baseline the mean lumbar spine T-score of all subjects and of 16 MM treated with bortezomib was -0.50 and -0.76 respectively. At baseline the mean femoral neck T-score for all subjects and for 16 MM treated with Bortezomib was -1.56 and -1.31 respectively. The baseline mean lumbar spine T-score for MGUS and MM was -0.71 and -0.43 respectively. The baseline mean femoral neck T-score of MGUS and MM was -1.61 and -1.54 respectively. In the group of 16 patients treated with Bortezomib we observed from baseline a change in lumbar bone mineral density T-score of 0.36 and at femoral neck bone density T-score of 0.25. Conclusion: These data show that patients treated with proteasome inhibitor showed moderate increment in bone mineral density at lumbar spine and at femoral neck. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonori Kobayakawa ◽  
Akiko Miyazaki ◽  
Makoto Saito ◽  
Takako Suzuki ◽  
Jun Takahashi ◽  
...  

AbstractDenosumab and romosozumab, a recently approved new drug, are effective and widely known molecular-targeted drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment. However, no studies have directly compared their therapeutic effects or safety in postmenopausal osteoporosis. This retrospective observational registry study compared the efficacy of 12-month denosumab or romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. The primary outcome was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine. Secondary outcomes included BMD changes at the total hip and femoral neck, changes in bone turnover markers, and adverse events. Propensity score matching was employed to assemble patient groups with similar baseline characteristics. Sixty-nine patients each received either denosumab or romosozumab for 12 months. The mean 12-month percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD was 7.2% in the denosumab group and 12.5% in the romosozumab group, indicating a significant difference between the groups. The percentage changes in BMD at both the total hip and femoral neck were also significantly higher at 12 months in the romosozumab group than in the denosumab group. In denosumab patients, bone formation and bone resorption markers were significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months from baseline. In the romosozumab group, the bone formation marker was significantly increased at 6 months and then returned to baseline, while the bone resorption marker was significantly decreased at both time points. Adverse events were few and predominantly minor in both groups, with no remarkable difference in the incidence of new vertebral fractures. Romosozumab showed a higher potential for improving BMD than denosumab in this clinical study of postmenopausal osteoporosis patient treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1343.1-1343
Author(s):  
A. R. Halidou ◽  
K. Nassar ◽  
S. Janani

Background:Bisphosphonates (BF) are used in the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget’s disease of bone, hypercalcemia and in patients with cancer. When used to treat osteoporosis, the optimal duration of treatment is 3 to 5 years; however, their long-term use has been rarely associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw.Objectives:To assess the risk of developing osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients followed for osteoporosis and on bisphosphonates (BP).Methods:Type of study: retrospective study conducted at the rheumatology department of the IBN ROCHD CHU in Casablanca.Duration: from October 2013 to October 2020 (7 years).Inclusion criteria: all patients followed for osteoporosis in the weakening osteopathies unit of the bone and treated with oral or intravenous bisphosphonates.Exclusion criteria: patients followed for other than osteoporosis.Results:896 patients were treated during this period. The average age was 62.74 years (28 to 90 years), of which 85.16% were women and 14.84% were men, for a sex ratio (F / M) of 5.74. As a history, 18.75% of patients are diabetic, 26.56% followed for breast neoplasm, 14.06% of patients had received long-term corticosteroid therapy for various pathologies such as chronic inflammatory rheumatism. Osteoporosis was postmenopausal in 687 patients, ie 76.67% of cases, 14.06% after long-term corticosteroid therapy, 8.15% following hormone therapy (anti-aromatases) and 6.92% following chemotherapy; note that 18.16% of these patients were found in at least two of the situations. The mean bone mineral density (BMD), T-score pair considered in all [T-score (BMD)] is -3 (0.736) in the lumbar spine (L1-L4), -2.9 (0.658) at the femoral neck, -2.6 (0.804) at the total hip before the start of treatment. 69.97% of the patients were put on Alendronic acid, 12.50% on Residronic acid, 10.93% on Zolidronic acid, 3.46% on Pamidronic acid and 3.14% received Strontium Ranelate, note that before the start of the treatment all the patients benefited from a dental consultation followed by care of any lesions, the bisphosphonates were only introduced after having ruled out all their dental contraindications, the average duration of treatment for all the molecules was 4.71 years (2 to 5 years) and no patient developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. The change in control BMD on average after 2 years of treatment was -2.7 (0.782) at the lumbar spine, -2.6 (0.749) at the femoral neck and -2.4 (0.713) at the hip total, after 5 years -2.4 (0.874) at the spine, -2.1 (0.809) at the femoral neck and -1.93 (861) at the total hip.Conclusion:The occurrence of ONJ in the treatment of osteoporosis with the use of BFs is rare, and appears to be unpredictable; but maintaining therapeutic caution, consisting in diagnosing and treating any dental lesions before starting treatment, can considerably reduce or even cancel the risk of occurrence; especially in patients treated with long-term intravenous pamidronate.References:[1]Dr Halidou Idrissa Abdoul-Rahamane, Pr Kawtar Nassar, PR Saadia Janani.[2]Rheumatology department of the IBN ROCHD CHU in CASABLANCA. Casablanca Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy. Hassan II University. MoroccoDisclosure of Interests:None declared.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. E4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffery D. St. Jeor ◽  
Taylor J. Jackson ◽  
Ashley E. Xiong ◽  
Aamir Kadri ◽  
Brett A. Freedman ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe goal of this study was to compare different recognized definitions of osteoporosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery to determine which patient population should be considered for preoperative optimization.METHODSA retrospective review of patients in whom lumbar spine surgery was planned at 2 academic medical centers was performed, and the rate of osteoporosis was compared based on different recognized definitions. Assessments were made based on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), CT Hounsfield units (HU), trabecular bone score (TBS), and fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). The rate of osteoporosis was compared based on different definitions: 1) the WHO definition (T-score ≤ −2.5) at total hip or spine; 2) CT HU of < 110; 3) National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) guidelines; and 4) “expanded spine” criteria, which includes patients meeting NBHA criteria and/or HU < 110, and/or “degraded” TBS in the setting of an osteopenic T-score. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with a DXA scan of the total hip and/or spine performed within 1 year and a lumbar spine CT scan within 6 months of the physician visit.RESULTSTwo hundred forty-four patients were included. The mean age was 68.3 years, with 70.5% female, 96.7% Caucasian, and the mean BMI was 28.8. Fracture history was reported in 53.8% of patients. The proportion of patients identified with osteoporosis on DXA, HUs, NBHA guidelines, and the authors’ proposed “expanded spine” criteria was 25.4%, 36.5%, 75%, and 81.9%, respectively. Of the patients not identified with osteoporosis on DXA, 31.3% had osteoporosis based on HU, 55.1% had osteoporosis with NBHA, and 70.4% had osteoporosis with expanded spine criteria (p < 0.05), with poor correlations among the different assessment tools.CONCLUSIONSLimitations in the use of DXA T-scores alone to diagnose osteoporosis in patients with lumbar spondylosis has prompted interest in additional methods of evaluating bone health in the spine, such as CT HU, TBS, and FRAX, to inform guidelines that aim to reduce fracture risk. However, no current osteoporosis assessment was developed with a focus on improving outcomes in spinal surgery. Therefore, the authors propose an expanded spine definition for osteoporosis to identify a more comprehensive cohort of patients with potential poor bone health who could be considered for preoperative optimization, although further study is needed to validate these results in terms of clinical outcomes.


2002 ◽  
pp. 531-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Flohr ◽  
A Lutz ◽  
EM App ◽  
H Matthys ◽  
M Reincke

OBJECTIVE: With increasing life span osteoporosis becomes a more recognized problem in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The aim of this cross-sectional study in 75 adult patients with CF (mean age 25.3 years) was to assess the prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and, for the first time, by quantitative ultrasound (QUS), and to identify predicting factors. DESIGN AND METHODS: Bone status was assessed at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and the femoral neck by DEXA, and at the calcaneus by QUS (stiffness index). These data were correlated with a variety of clinical and anthropomorphic variables. Biochemical markers of bone turnover such as osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, crosslinks in urine, 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OH vitamin D), parathyroid hormone, calcium and free testosterone were determined by standard assays. RESULTS: The mean BMD T score (+/-s.e.m.) was -1.4+/-0.17 at the lumbar spine, and -0.54+/-0.16 at the femoral neck. The mean T score of the calcaneal stiffness index was -0.83+/-0.19. Based on a lumbar spine T score <-2.5 by DEXA, 27% of the patients had osteoporosis. Multiple regression analysis showed that the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the use of oral glucocorticoids were independent predictors of low lumbar spine BMD, whereas body mass index (BMI) and the use of oral glucocorticoids were independent predictors of low femoral neck BMD. The stiffness index correlated moderately with BMD (0.49-0.62, P<0.0001). QUS had a sensitivity and specificity of only 57% and 89% respectively for diagnosing 'osteoporosis' (based on a femoral neck T score <-2.5 by DEXA). Positive and negative predictive values were 36% and 95% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Low BMD is frequent in adults with CF and is most strongly correlated with disease severity (BMI, FEV1) and the use of glucocorticoids. Calcaneal QUS might help to screen out patients with a normal BMD, but sensitivity and specificity were not sufficiently high to replace DEXA in these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document