scholarly journals The Prognostic Significance of the Stage of Reaching MRD-Negative for Patients with Multiple Myeloma Received ASCT

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3945-3945
Author(s):  
Qian Sun ◽  
Juan Li
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Objective: To explore the prognostic significance of the stage of reaching MRD-negative for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 186 NDMM patients who received "induction therapy-ASCT-maintenance therapy" in our center and reached MRD-negative, according to the stage when the patient's MRD status turned negative (induction therapy, 3 months after ASCT, maintenance therapy) is divided into three stages, A, B, and C (Figure 1). We compared the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients in the three stages. Results: The median time to progress (TTP) of 186 patients was not reached, the median overall survival (OS) was 113.8 months, and the median follow-up time was 67.6 months; the number of cases in the three stages of A, B, and C was 73 (39.2%), 42 (22.6%), and 71 (38.2%), respectively (Figure 2). The median TTP of the patients in the three stages was not reached (P=0.013), and the median OS was not reached, not reached, and 71.2 months, respectively (P=0.026). Among the 124 standard-risk cytogenetics patients, the median TTP of the three stages of patients was not reached (P=0.121), and the median OS was not reached, not reached, and 99.6 months, respectively (P=0.091) (Figure 3). Among the 38 high-risk cytogenetics patients, the median TTP of patients in the three stages were unreached, 53.9 months, and 35.8 months (P=0.060), and the median OS was not reached, 71.2 months, and 60.2 months (P=0.625) (Figure 4). Among the 157 R-ISS Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients, the median TTP of the three stages was not reached (P=0.174), and the median OS was not reached, not reached, and 99.6 months (P=0.186) (Figure 5). Among 29 cases of R-ISS Ⅲ, the median TTP of the 3 stage patients was unreached, unreached, and 35.1 months (P<0.001), and the median OS was unreached, unreached, and 48.5 months, respectively (P=0.020) (Figure 6). Conclusion: For the same patients with MRD negative, the prognosis of patients reaching MRD-negative at different stages is different. The stage of reaching MRD-negative can predict the prognosis of patients with R-ISS stage Ⅲ, but cannot predict the prognosis of patients with R-ISS Ⅰ-Ⅱ. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Novel Insight into Multi-Hit Multiple Myeloma Based on "Two-Hit" Theory of Cancer Causation

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 47-48
Author(s):  
Chenxing Du ◽  
Xue-Han Mao ◽  
Jiahui Liu ◽  
Huishou Fan ◽  
Weiwei Sui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Drug Induction ◽  
Double Hit ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Standard Risk

Background: Current definition of multi-hit multiple myeloma (MM) is based upon the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CA). But we may overlook the influence of standard-risk CA and different concurrent patterns. In fact, standard-risk t(11;14) and del(13q) may bring extra danger when concurrent with other CA. And the concurrency of two secondary CA may do more harm to patients than that of one secondary CA with one primary CA. This study is to answer whether CA number or pattern exert an impact on outcomes of MM patients. Methods: This study was carried out based on the prospective, non-randomized clinical trial BDH 2008/02. 537 MM patients with complete cytogenetic data were enrolled, of whom 64% (341/537) patients were treated with bortezomib-based three-drug induction therapy, and the remaining patients with thalidomide-based therapy. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was recommended post induction therapy in transplant-eligible patients, and all patients received maintenance therapy for two years. CA were divided into primary CA [pCA: any type of IgH breakage], and secondary CA [sCA: del(17p), del(13q), gain(1q) (≥3 copies)] Results: In the era of novel agents, patients with pCA only did not have outcomes different from those patients without any FISH abnormality. Patients with s1 CA or s1+p CA had hazard ratio for PFS or OS of 1.5-2.0. Patients with s2 CA or s2+p CA had hazard ratio for PFS or OS of 2.0-3.0. Patients with concurrent del(13q), del(17p) and gain(1q) (s3 CA) had hazard ratio for PFS of 3.11 and for OS of 3.00. Patients with s3+p CA had hazard ratio for PFS of 4.65 and for OS of 6.16. Based on these results, we divided patients into four subgroups: no CA or only pCA, s1 CA in the presence or absence of pCA, s2 CA in the presence or absence of pCA, and s3 CA in the presence or absence of pCA. Both the PFS and OS decreased in a stepwise fashion with the accumulation of CA (Figure 1). Therefore, we defined double-hit MM as any one sCA in the presence or absence of pCA. Triple-hit MM referred to two sCA plus pCA or not, and quadra-hit MM referred to three sCA plus pCA or not. Furthermore, we confirmed the prognostic independence of CA pattern in the multivariant analysis with International Staging System (ISS) and LDH (Table 1). Conclusion: In this study, we found that the primary CA as a whole lost its adverse effect when treated by bortezomib-based regimens. CA subtype conferred a prognostic value. In details, secondary CA imposed an accumulative risk to patients. For the first time, we indicated that double-hit or triple-hit MM should be defined upon the number of secondary CA. This definition coincides with the "Two-Hit" theory of cancer causation and fits well with MM evolution model. The prognostic significance of CA pattern needs validation in further prospective trials. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Bortezomib Induction Followed by ASCT in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Achievement of Response After Induction and Achieving CR Post-ASCT Are Both Important Prognostic Markers

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1866-1866
Author(s):  
Min Kyoung Kim ◽  
Chang-Ki Min ◽  
Myung Soo Hyun ◽  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 1866 Background: In multiple myeloma (MM), the association between the response to induction before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and long-term outcome is less clear but the situation may change with the introduction of novel agents. We therefore assessed the clinical relevance of response of bortezomib induction treatment or post-ASCT response for patients who received bortezomib-combined induction chemotherapy followed by ASCT. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 183 MM patients who received bortezomib-containing induction therapy (BTZ-IT) followed by ASCT in 24 institutions throughout Korea between 2003 and 2010. Records of these patients were reviewed using the Korean Myeloma Registry database (www.myeloma.or.kr). Each institution was requested to reconfirm the data using additional case report forms. Patients who had overt MM based on International Myeloma Working Group diagnostic criteria were selected. Results: One-hundred seventy eight patients were eligible. Their median age was 56 years (range, 28–69 years) and 96 (53.9%) were male. Forty nine (27.5%) received bortezomib as front-line therapy and 129 (72.5%) as second-line treatment. All patients underwent ASCT and 22 (12.4%) were treated with tandem ASCT. Ninety-seven (54.5%) patients were treated with maintenance therapy after ASCT. After BTZ-IT, the response rates in this selected series of patients were 37.6% CR, 12.4% VGPR, 41.0% PR, 7.3% SD and 1.7% PD (Figure 1A, 1B, 1C); the corresponding post-ASCT rates were 69.2% CR, 14.0% VGPR, 11.0% PR, 2.9% SD and 2.9% PD. At a median follow-up of 46.6 months, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were 70.0% and 31.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that factors independently predictive of OS and EFS included achievement of BTZ-IT response °Ã PR (P=0.025 and P=0.014, respectively) and the treatment with maintenance therapy (P=0.048 and P=0.001, respectively). Post-ASCT CR vs. °Â VGPR was also an independent prognostic factor for OS and EFS (P=0.0001 and P=0.002, respectively). Conclusion: At least PR to BTZ-IT and CR after ASCT were predictive of survival. These findings suggest that patients who responded to BTZ-IT may benefit from ASCT due to an enhanced quality of response. Maintenance therapy can also affect patient outcomes. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Impact of proteasome inhibitor vs. IMiD maintenance therapy on outcomes of patients with high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20557-e20557
Author(s):  
Eric Leon Tam ◽  
David Joseph Iberri ◽  
Michaela Liedtke ◽  
Lori S. Muffly ◽  
Parveen Shiraz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Standard Risk

e20557 Background: The ideal choice of maintenance therapy in patients with HRMM high-risk multiple myeloma remains unknown. We analyzed the outcomes of patients with HRMM undergoing transplant receiving different maintenance approaches. Methods: Patients with MM undergoing their first ASCT from 2012-19 within 1 year of diagnosis were identified from the prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing ASCT. HRMM was defined as having t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del17p13, or gain 1q detected on fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Results: Of the 412 patients undergoing ASCT within 1 year of diagnosis, 333 had FISH data available and of these, 37% (124/333) patients had high-risk cytogenetics. Distribution of HR cytogenetics was as follows: deletion 17p: 37% (n = 46), t(4;14): 27% (n = 34), t(14;16) or t(14;20): 12% (n = 26), gain1q: 31% (n = 41). 9% (n = 12) had more than one HR abnormality. In patients with HRMM, median age at transplant was 59 years (range: 39 to 73), and 61% (n = 103) were males. 64% (n = 107) of high-risk patients received post-transplant maintenance therapy. Maintenance therapy in this group included a proteasome inhibitor (PI) in 34% (n = 29), immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) in 59% (n = 51), or both in 7% (n = 6). There was no difference in baseline characteristics of HRMM patients receiving PI vs. IMiD maintenance, except that patients with del17p were more likely to receive PI maintenance therapy (55% vs 28%, p = 0.01). (Table) After a median follow-up of 3.1 years from diagnosis, patients with HRMM had inferior PFS compared to patients with standard risk disease, with median PFS of 3 vs. 4.8 years, p < 0.001. Amongst the 86 HRMM patients receiving maintenance therapy, median PFS in patients receiving PI vs. IMiD vs. both PI + IMiD maintenance was 3 vs. 3.2 vs. 2.2 years, respectively, log-rank p = 0.7. In the sub-group of patients with 17p deletion, median PFS in the three groups was 3 vs. 2.9 vs. 2.2 years, respectively, log-rank p = 0.7. Conclusions: Patients with HRMM have inferior PFS compared to patients with standard risk disease. We observed similar outcomes in HRMM patients post-transplant regardless of the choice of maintenance therapy. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Carfilzomib-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone (KPD) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients - an Institutional Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5572-5572
Author(s):  
Pallavi Mehta ◽  
Neha Yadav ◽  
Mohan Bhaarat ◽  
Sumeet Prakash Mirgh ◽  
Vishvdeep Khushoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Haematological Toxicity ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Response Status

Introduction Multiple myeloma has relished the emergence of various novel agents in last few decades. Unfortunately,relapses are still an inevitable part and at each relapse, treatment choice becomes a complex decision making process as these patients usually have exhausted conventional therapeutic regimens.Carfilzomib is a second-in class Proteosome Inhibitor (PI) and has been approved for patientsrefractory to minimum 2 lines of prior therapies. We are, hereby, presenting our initial experience with this novel combination (KPD)in RRMM patients at our centre. Methodology Retrospective study of RRMM patients who received KPD therapy from August 2017 till October 2018. Responses were assessed as per International Myeloma Working Group. Study was approved by Institutional Review Board. Results Total 39 patients were treated with KPD regimen during study period. Median age was 56 (32-74 years) with male ratio of 51.2% (n=20). At baseline presentation, bone disease {n=32 (82%)} was the most common presenting complaint followed by anemia {n=21 (53.8%)} and renal failure {n=16 (41%)}. Most common ISS staging was ISS-3 {n=18(46.1%)} and subtype was Light chain myeloma {n=15 (38.3%)} followed by IgG {n=13 (33.3%)}.Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) was available in {n= 10 (25%)} and it was positive for del13q (n=1/10) and del17p (n=1/10) and t(11;14) (n=1/10). (Table-1) Median number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 3(1-15). Thirty-six (91%) patients were relapsed/refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide whereas n=3(9%) were relapsed/refractory to bortezomib only. Eleven (30.5%) patients underwent SCT pre KPD therapy including 2/11 patients received double SCT. Pre KPD 25 (64.1%) patients had progressive disease (PD), 10 (25%) had relapse and 4 (11.1%) patients had stable disease (SD). Median number of KPD cycles were 3(1-8). Median number of KPD cycles after which response assessment was donewas 3 (2-8). Median time to treatment response was 3 (2-7) months. ORR was 51.2% {CR-n=5 (12.8%); VGPR-n=5 (12.8%), PR-n=10 (25.6%)} whereas 2 (5.1%) patient had SD and 10 (25.6%) patients had PD at 2-8 cycles. Two (5.1%) patients are yet to be assessed. (Table-1) Common hematological toxicities seen were anemia (n=8), thrombocytopenia (n=13){grade-3/4=30.7%; n=4/13} and neutropenia(n=14){grade3/4=21.4%; n=3/14}.Non haematological toxicity such as cardiac toxicity was not observed in our patients. Pre KPD 2D-ECHO was available for 13 patients and which was normal in all patients. Post 2-4 cycles of KPD, 2D-ECHO was available for 7 patients and all patients had normal ECHO. Carfilzomib induced hypertension was seen in 20 patientsand could be well controlled with antihypertensives. Peripheral neuropathy (grade1/2) was seen in 10 patients. We also observedCarfilzomib induced hyponatremia in one patient.Febrile neutropenia(bacterial =6, viral=4, possible fungal=5) was seen in 14 patients.(Table-2) Twelve (20.5%) patients proceeded to either maintenance therapy or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Eight patients opted only for maintenance (carfilzomib=5, pomalidomide-dexamethasone=2 and pomalidomide =1). Remaining n=4/12(16%) patients received SCT. Pre SCT response status was VGPR n=2; PR n=1 and SD=1. Post SCT response status was VGPR (n=3) &PR (n=1). Post SCT, 3 patients were started on maintenance therapy as Bortezomib/pomalidomide=1, Pomalidomide/dexamethasone=2. One patient has been continued on KPD as a consolidation therapy. At a median follow-up of 10 months (1-14 months), relapse rate was 12.8% (n=5). Ten (25.6%) patients had PD.Mortality rate was 8.3% (n=3), commonest cause being progressive disease. The estimated mean PFS, OS and EFS of entire cohort was 11.9 months (95% C.I. 10.8- 13 months) (figure-1 a), 13 months (95% C.I. 11.9-14 months) (figure-1 b) and 7.9 months (95% C.I. 6.5-9.3 months) (figure - 1 c) respectively. Conclusion KPD is a well-tolerated regimen for patients with RRMM who have exhausted frontline myeloma regimen, however at the cost of significant side effects like infections and hypertension. It seems to be a convincing regimen as a bridge to ASCT but warrants further studies with longer follow-up to validate our results. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals The Prognostic Significance of Minimal Residual Disease Detection after Induction and ASCT to the Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4956-4956
Author(s):  
Weiqin Yao ◽  
Zhu Mingqing ◽  
Yao Feirong ◽  
Lingzhi Yan ◽  
Song Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Objective: In the last decade the outcome in multiple myeloma in CHINA has greatly improved due to the new, effective therapies including PIs and Imids. But responses to treatment and survival remains heterogeneous because of patient characteristic, disease biology and mechanisms of drug resistance. More and more studies have established the link between depth of response and improved PFS and OS. multiparameter-flow cytometry (MFC) is a main method to detect minimal residual disease(MRD) in myeloma. Sensitivity will be at least at 10-4 to 10-5 by 10-color MFC. Imaging techniques such as PET-CT are important for EMD and bone MRD detection. whole body DWI-MRI is a new imaging technique by mean of the apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) which can qualify the depth of response to antineoplastic treatment. This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic significance of MRD by 10-color MFC and imaging to the MM patients after induction.Methods: 102 patients with newly diagnosed MM were enrolled at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from July 2015 to July 2017. All patients were diagnosed and the response were assessed by IMWG criteria. The median of age was 58 (31-75).There were 46 patients with IgG type , 24 IgA , 14 light chain, 18 others. 34 Patients in ISS stageⅠ,34 in stage Ⅱ, 30 in stage Ⅲ. All patients received 4-6 cycles of triplet bortezomib based or lenalidomide based induction therapy. Transplantation available patients received APBSCT with BUCY condition followed by 4-6 cycles of bortezomib based or lenalidomide based consolidation which were given to transplantation unavailable patients too. Lenalidomide and thalidomide were used for over 2y of maintenance therapy. Bone marrow aspirates for MRD imaging MRD assessment were obtained at the end of induction and 1year after ASCT.The median of follow-up was 13 (2-29) months.Results: According to MRD by MFC and imaging after induction therapy and 1 year after ASCT, the patients were divided into different groups. MFC negativity was 33%(29/88) after induction therapy compared with 63%(32/51) after ASCT (X2=11.636,P=0.001). After induction therapy, the median PFS was 22 months for MRD positive group compared with not reached with MRD negative group by MFC (P=0.042) in patients with very good partial remission(VGPR) and above. The 2 years PFS was 100% for those with MRD negative compared with 60% for MRD positive by imaging. The 2 years PFS was 80% for those have multiclonal normal plasma cells compared with 52.6% for those without. The median PFS was not reached for MFC MRD negative patients 1 year after ASCT compared with 20 months for positive patients. (P=0.002). Multivariate analysis including high risk cytogenetics(17p-, t(4;14), t(14;16)), sex, age, ISS, chemotherapy, ASCT, CR/VGPR, normal PCs showed that the MFC MRD and ASCT were independent prognostic factor.Conclusions: Patients with MFC MRD negative after induction therapy or ASCT is a better prognostic marker than CR or even the best marker. Imaging MRD negativity and the appearance of normal plasma cells in the bone marrow suggests a better prognosis.We will have a try to do more research on overall survival(OS),include longer follow-up and a larger number of patients enrolled. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Long Term Survival Analysis of Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Induction Therapy+ Autologous STEM CELL Trasplantation, Comparing Velcade-Dexametasone to Alkylating Polichemotherapy As Induction Therapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5764-5764
Author(s):  
Sara Caceres ◽  
Rocio Cardesa ◽  
Carmen Cabrera ◽  
M. Helena Bañas ◽  
Fatima Ibañez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Bone Marrow ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease. In young patients, autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) remains a cornerstone treatment after induction therapy. Induction therapy has varied during time, from alkylating polychemotherapy (VBAD,VCMP) or VAD chemotherapy (AVAD) to Velcade-Dexametasone based regimens (VD). We present results of follow-up of a large cohort of patients treated with ABMT. We described overall survival (OS; from transplant to death by any cause) and progression free survival (PFS; from transplant to death by any case or progressive disease defined by reappearance by inmunofixation, or duplication of monoclonal peak after ABMT) , and the impact of induction therapy regiments. Patients: 183 patients transplanted from 2002 to 2017. The median age of the patients was 59 years (33-72). Before 2008 all the patients were treated in alkylating based chemotherapy (42 patients). After 2008 patients were treated with VD based regimens (141patients). Only 12 patients received maintenance therapy based in PETHEMA trials 2005 and 2012. No one patient received a planed second transplant; only 32 patients received a second transplant after relapse as consolidation therapy. Results: Median follow-up of patients still alive is 3.65 years (0.15-14.77). Median OS of all patients was 9.12 years (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.28-NR); Median PFS was 3.02 years(95% CI: 2.46-3.76). At 13 years only 2% of patients remains progression free (CI: 0.00-17%). There were significant differences between patients treated before and after VD regimens. The median OS of patients treated with APVAD was significantly shorter compared to VD (6.22 years, CI[3.39-12] vs. NR, CI[6.28-NR], p=0.025) (HR=0.49, p=0.01). Conclusions: VD schemes of induction before ABMT have improved remarkably OS inpatients with Myeloma; nonetheless, plateau is not observed in EFS. Further analysis must address if EFS could represent a strong indicator of OS, mainly due to novel effective salvage therapies after relapse/refractoriness could be a confounding factor. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Redefining the Prognostic Significance of t(11;14) Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Susan Bal ◽  
Smith Giri ◽  
Kelly N. Godby ◽  
Luciano J. Costa
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Standard Risk

Background In the era prior to introduction of novel agents, multiple myeloma (MM) harboring t(11;14) was characterized as standard risk. More recently, its unique biology, predictive ability and the prospect of targeted therapeutic agents have renewed interest in t(11;14) MM. Using a large, contemporary real-world database, we investigated the characteristics and outcomes of t(11;14) MM. Methods We used the Flatiron Health Electronic Health Record (EHR)-derived de-identified database to source patients (pts) with newly diagnosed MM from 1/2011 to 2/2020 with available Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) results documented within 90 days of diagnosis. We compared characteristics of t(11;14)+ patients [without additional high-risk FISH abnormalities: del(17p), Ch1 abnormality (Ch1a), t(4;14), t(14;16) or t(14;20)] vs. t(11;14)- patients (without additional high risk FISH) vs. del(17p) (irrespective of other abnormality) vs. Ch1a (Ch1a without additional high-risk FISH) vs. high-risk translocations [t(4;14), t(14;16) or t(14;20) without del(17p)]. We subsequently compared real-world progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) across these five subsets. Additionally, we assessed the impact of t(11;14) as additional FISH abnormality in patients with del(17p) and in patients with Ch1a. We used Kaplan Meier methods with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression model for survival analysis with date of diagnosis as the index date for follow-up. Results 6039 patients in the database met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 83.6% of patients received initial therapy with immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) and/or proteasome inhibitor (PI); of these 40.3% received combination of IMiD and PI. Overall, 27.1% received autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Median follow up was 2.1 years (IQR 0.8-4.0). There were 637 pts in t(11;14)+ group, 3173 in t(11;14)- group, 587 in del(17p), 1205 in Ch1a and 437 with high-risk translocations. The t(11;14)+ group had a higher proportion of men, IgM and light-chain isotype, as well as a higher proportion of patients with serum creatinine ³ 2mg/dl (Table). Patients in t(11;14)+ group had worse PFS (mPFS 3.1 vs. 3.3 years, p=0.02) and worse OS (mOS 5.9 vs. 6.5 years , p=0.04) compared to t(11;14)-, but better PFS and OS than the other three high-risk groups (Figure panels A and B). Worse PFS for t(11;14)+ was demonstrable even after adjustment for sex, age, race/ethnicity, immunoglobulin isotype, stage, comorbidities, and treatment received (adjusted HR=0.87, 95% C.I. 0.77-0.98, P=0.027). We subsequently analyzed the impact of presence of t(11;14) in MM with del(17p) or Ch1a.. The presence of t(11;14) in addition to del(17p) resulted in worse OS compared to del 17p without t(11;14) (mOS 2.8y vs. 3.7y; p=0.04). Indeed, the impact of t(11;14) on del(17p) was comparable to the impact of t(4;14) (Figure, Panel C). There was no difference in survival with concomitant presence of t(11;14) with Ch1a (Figure, Panel D). Conclusion MM with t(11;14) has distinct features at presentation and even when treated with modern therapy carries worse prognosis than otherwise standard-risk MM. The concomitant presence of t(11;14) portends a negative prognostic impact to MM with del(17p) but does not appear to impact MM with Ch1a. When present alongside del17p, t(11;14) behaves like a high-risk translocation and identifies a subset of MM in greatest need of newer therapies. Figure 1 Disclosures Costa: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy.

Thalidomide-Interferon Vs. Interferon Maintenance Therapy After Thal-Dex Vs. MP Induction Therapy in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2891-2891
Author(s):  
Heinz Ludwig ◽  
Zdenek Adam ◽  
Elena Tóthová ◽  
Roman Hajek ◽  
Boris Labar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Logrank Test ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Abstract 2891 Poster Board II-867 Thalidomide maintenance therapy after completion of induction therapy plus ASCT and also after conventional therapy yielded conflicting results with some trials showing improvement in overall survival and others not. This study evaluates the efficacy of Thalidomide plus Interferon a2b (Thal-IFN) in comparison to interferon a2b (IFN) as maintenance therapy in elderly pts with multiple myeloma. For induction therapy, 289 pts had been randomized to either Thalidomide-Dexamethasone or to Melphalan-Prednisolone; results of this part of the study had been reported previously (BLOOD, 113, 3435-3442, 2009). 137 pts who had completed 9 cycles of induction therapy and had achieved stable disease or better were eligible for maintenance treatment, and 128 (median age 72 years, range 54 - 86 years) had finally been randomized to either Thal (starting dose: 200mg/day) in combination with IFN-a2b (Schering-Plough, 3 Mega U, TIW) or IFN a2b (IFN) at the same dose/schedule only. All pts were scheduled for zoledronate 4mg, q 4 weeks. Median follow up from randomization to maintenance: 35 mos. Median duration of maintenance therapy: 13.2 mos and 8.3 mos for pts randomized to Thal-IFN or to IFN, respectively (logrank test p=0.20). Maintenance therapy with Thal-IFN resulted in an improvement in the depth of response from PR to VGPR or CR in 5 (8%) and with IFN in 2 (3%) pts, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the Thal-IFN (27.7 mos) compared to the IFN only maintenance group (13.2 mos), (HR, 0.55; 95% 95% CI, 0.36-0.86; log-rank test, p=0.0068). Analysis of PFS by either Thal-Dex or MP induction therapy showed a significantly shorter PFS in pts started on Thal-Dex and subsequently randomized to IFN maintenance only (7.8 mos, log-rank test, p=0.037). PFS was 27.7 mos in pts started on Thal-Dex followed by Thal-IFN, 20.2 mos in those with MP induction therapy followed by IFN, and 27.6 mos in pts with Thal-IFN maintenance after MP induction therapy. Overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups (Thal-IFN 52.6 mos and IFN 51.4 mos, HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.53-1.66, log-rank test; p=0.81). OS by induction therapy did not vary significantly between the four treatment groups (logrank test, p=0.99). No significant difference in OS was seen between pts younger than 75 years and those aged 75 years or older (logrank test, p=0.39). Survival after progression of disease tended to be longer in pts who received IFN maintenance therapy only compared to those started on Thal-IFN (HR: 1.75, 95% CI, 0.97 – 3.14, logrank test: 0.056), while OS was similar between both groups when analyzed from termination of maintenance therapy (HR: 1.20, 95% CI, 0.65 – 2.20, log rang test 0.57). Baseline scores of the EORTC QLQ C30 items general health (Thal-IFN, mean 56; IFN, mean 59) and overall quality of life (Thal-IFN, mean 58; IFN, mean 60) were markedly below the score obtained in an healthy population (mean 75.3 and 73.3 respectively), but did neither differ at baseline between both groups nor did they vary significantly during the course of the maintenance (statistics will be provided). Cytogenetic data were available in 66 pts. PFS tended to be longer in pts with adverse FISH findings [t (4; 14), t (14; 20) Del 17p and abnormalities of 1q21] compared to the standard risk group, but differences were not significant (median: 31.5 vs. 21.6 mos, HR: 1.69, 95% CI, 0.13 – 3.07, log-rank test 0.084). The median of OS was 72.3 mos in those with standard risk and 39.6 mos in those with high risk features (HR: 1.94, 95% CI 0.91-4.13, log rank test: 0.082). In multivariate analysis (Cox model) only Thal-IFN maintenance therapy was shown to correlate significantly with PFS (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.89, p=0.04) while for poor performance status, low hemoglobin, and low albumin a statistically non-significant correlation with survival was noted. Hematologic toxicity was similar between both groups. Pts on Thal-IFN maintenance experienced significantly more neuropathy (p=0.0024), constipation (p=0.0007) and skin toxicity (p=0.0063) and increase in renal impairment (p=0.037). In addition, there was a tendency for more dyspnea (p=0.40) and more fatigue (p=0.11) in pts on Thal-IFN maintenance therapy. Other non-hematological toxicities were similarly distributed in both therapy arms. In conclusion, Thal-IFN maintenance therapy resulted in increased PFS compared IFN maintenance treatment only, but OS was similar between both groups. Disclosures: Ludwig: Celgene: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; AMGEN: Honoraria; Ortho-Biotech : Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Hajek:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Kuhn:Schering-Plough: Employment.

Persistent Benefit of VTD (Bortezomib/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone) As Pretransplant Induction Therapy for Multiple Myeloma: Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomized Phase 3 Pethema/GEM Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3457-3457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Rosiñol ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Ana Isabel Teruel ◽  
Dolores Hernandez ◽  
M Jesús Blanchard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Background: The randomized PETHEMA/GEM phase III trial GEM05menos65 (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00461747) demonstrated that pretransplant induction therapy with VTD resulted in a significantly higher CR rate both, pretransplant and postransplant and in a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) when compared with thalidomide/dexamethasone (TD) and combination chemotherapy plus bortezomib (VBMCP/VBAD/B) (Rosiñol et al, Blood 2012). We report here the long-term results of the trial, five years after the last patient was included. Methods: From April 6, 2006 to August 5, 2009, 386 patients younger than 65 years with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) were randomized to receive three different induction regimens: six 4-week cycles of TD (thalidomide 200 mg daily; dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4 and 9-12) vs. six 4-week cycles of VTD (TD at identical doses plus i.v. bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11) vs. combination chemotherapy plus bortezomib (4 cycles of alternating VBMCP and VBAD chemotherapy followed by two cycles of i.v. bortezomib at the usual dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1,4,8,11 every 3 weeks). The duration of the induction therapy was 24 weeks in all arms. All patients were planned to undergo ASCT with high-dose melphalan at 200 mg/m2 followed by maintenance therapy with thalidomide/bortezomib (TV) vs. thalidomide (T) vs. alfa-2b-interferon (alfa2-IFN) for 3 years. One-hundred and thirty patients were allocated to VTD, 127 to TD and 129 to VBMCP/VBAD/B. Seventy out of the 330 patients (21%) with cytogenetic studies had high-risk cytogenetics [t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or 17p deletion]. Patient characteristics at diagnosis and prognostic factors such as ISS, cytogenetics and maintenance arm were similarly distributed in the 3 arms. Results: After a median follow-up of 70.6 months, VTD resulted in a significantly longer PFS when compared with TD and VBMCP/VBAD/B (56.1 vs 29.2 vs 39.9 months, p=0.005) (Figure 1). The estimated overall survival (OS) at 8 years was 60% with no significant differences among the 3 arms. In the overall series, the PFS was significantly shorter in patients with high-risk cytogenetics compared with patients with standard-risk (15.7 vs. 44.3 months, p=0.003). In the TD and in the VBMCP/VBAD/B arm patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a significantly shorter PFS than patients with standard-risk (8.9 vs 32.8 months, p=0.04 in TD group; 14.1 vs. 43.3 months, p=0.05 in VBMCP/VBAD/B group). However, there was no significant difference in the VTD arm (23.6 vs 56.1 months, p=0.2). Patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a significantly shorter OS in the overall series (median 42.1 months vs not reached, p=0.00001) and this was observed in the three treatment arms: VTD median 37.1 months vs not reached (p=0.001), TD median 54.2 months vs not reached (p=0.06), VBMCP/VBAD/B median 30.2 months vs not reached (p=0.007). The achievement of a deeper response at the end of induction was associated with a longer PFS and OS. Thus, patients achieving CR at the end of induction had a significantly longer PFS than patients achieving a lower degree of response (median 62 vs. 28 months, p=0.00001), irrespective of the treatment arm. Furthermore, on an intention to treat basis, patients who were in postrasplant CR had a significantly longer PFS (p<0.00001) and OS (p<0.00001) than those who did not reach CR after ASCT (p<0.001). In the overall series the OS after progression was 30.5 months and was not significantly different among the 3 arms (VTD 25.4 months, TD 50 months, VBMCP/VBAD/B 30.2 months, p=0.4). Patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a significantly shorter OS after relapse in the overall series (13.3 months vs. 37.5 months, p=0.001), in the VTD arm (13.3 vs 33.9, p=0.01) and in the VBMCP/VBAD/B arm (8.5 vs 38 months, p=0.01). Conclusions: Our long-term results confirm that induction with VTD results in a significantly longer PFS when compared with TD and VBMCP/VBAD/B. Patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a worse outcome even with the use of novel drugs. Finally, the PFS of 56 months achieved with VTD is the longest ever reported in the first line treatment of younger patients with MM elegible for ASCT and support the use of VTD as the standard of care for pretransplant induction therapy. Figure 1: PFS according to the induction arm Figure 1:. PFS according to the induction arm Disclosures Rosiñol: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. De La Rubia:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Gutierrez:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Martinez-Lopez:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Alegre:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. San Miguel:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Successful Management of Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Multiple Myeloma By Using a Biweekly or Longer Modified Bortezomib Schedule As Interval Maintenance therapy

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5758-5758
Author(s):  
Michihide Tokuhira ◽  
Yuta Kimura ◽  
Tatsuki Tomikawa ◽  
Yasuyuki Takahashi ◽  
Morihiko Sagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Clinical Response Rate ◽  
Molecular Response

Abstract Background: Substantial efficacy has been demonstrated with bortezomib (Bor)-containing regimens for the treatment of refractory/relapsed (RR) patients with transplant-ineligible (TI) multiple myeloma (MM). However, the dosing schedules for induction therapy and the significance of maintenance therapy using Bor in clinical settings have yet to be standardized. Discontinuations and dose reduction of Bor owing to severe adverse events (AEs) such as peripheral neuropathy (PN) and infection are frequent causes of adjustments to the standard 9 cycles of Bor/dexamethasone (BD) therapy used for induction in clinical practice. We have previously demonstrated that a change in Bor administration to a schedule of weekly or longer intervals had similar or greater efficacy for patients with RR-MM including transplant-eligible (Tokuhira M, et al. Leuk Res. 35:591-7, 2011). To investigate the efficacy of this modified Bor dosing schedule in the treatment focusing of TI-RR-MM, we retrospectively analyzed 22 patients receiving weekly-BD induction followed by a modified schedule of biweekly or longer intervals using Bor as maintenance therapy in a single institution. Methods: Data on the 22 TI-RR-MM patients treated with BD therapy in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The induction therapy consisted of intravenous injections of Bor (1.3 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in combination with dexamethasone (10–20 mg) on days 1 and 2 after Bor infusion, every 5 weeks. After BD induction, Bor maintenance was initiated with a schedule of biweekly or longer intervals. The dose of BD could be reduced based on AEs or other social aspects at the discretion of the treating physician. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period between BD initiation of treatment to the last follow-up. Results: The median age of patients at the time of BD induction was 72.6 years (range, 49–84 years), and the subtypes of MM were the IgG type in 14 patients, IgA type in 6 patients, and BJP in 2 patients. Twelve patients were men and 10 were women. On the basis of the International Staging System classification, the clinical stage was I in 3 patients, II in 16 patients, and III in 3 patients. The median number of prior treatment regimens was 2.0 (range, 1–6). The median follow-up duration was 4.3 years (inter-quartile range, 3.0–7.8 years). Ten patients were alive, and 12 patients had died at the time of reporting. The median duration from the start of the first line treatment to BD initiation was 1.8 years (range, 0.1–14.8 years). The median number of BD induction cycles was 2.0 (range, 1–6), and 8 patients (36%) achieved a partial response (PR), although the other 14 patients (64%) showed stable disease or only a minimal response. Although AEs such as PN and gastrointestinal tract symptoms developed in 10 of 22 patients during BD induction, all 22 patients could move on to the maintenance phase. The median duration of Bor maintenance was 14.5 months (range, 1.8–76.5 months). Three patients were still receiving maintenance therapy at the time of reporting. Six patients (27.2%) received maintenance therapy for over 2 years, and 3 (13.6%) received it for over 4 years. The median OS was 3.6 years (range, 0.4–6.5 years), and the duration of Bor therapy from induction to the last administration was 2.5 years. The median progression free survival was 1.6 years (range, 0.3–6.5 years). During maintenance therapy, 5 patients achieved a PR. The reasons for cessation of Bor maintenance therapy were AEs in 8 patients and progressive disease in 11 patients. No patient died during Bor administration in this study. Discussion: We retrospectively analyzed 22 TI-RR-MM patients receiving modified BD therapy. Pantani L et al. reported the results of using BD therapy for 85 RR-MM patients, and demonstrated that twice-weekly Bor administration resulted in a clinical response rate of 19% and a median OS of 22 months (Ann Hematol, 2014). Although the clinical response rate in our study was inferior to that of Pantani L et al., the median OS in our study was superior (3.6 years) than those of previous reports. Because the majority of patients in this study were frail or elderly, the early decision to change to maintenance therapy before they developed severe AEs resulted in a good clinical outcome and a longer OS. Continuing BD therapy without a satisfactory molecular response might be an attractive therapeutic approach for TI-RR-MM patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document