scholarly journals Response Kinetics of Daratumumab-Based Regimens in Patients with Newly Diagnosed or Refractory/Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3806-3806
Author(s):  
Jiasheng Wang ◽  
Raul Arroyo-Suarez ◽  
William Tse
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Late Response ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: It is controversial in multiple myeloma (MM) whether early and late responders to therapies have similar clinical outcomes. Daratumumab (DARA) is a human anti-CD38 antibody that has been increasingly used in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). The association between response kinetics to DARA and clinical outcomes remains unexplored. Methods: Individual-participant data were obtained from phase 3 trials: POLLUX (Dimopoulos, NEJM, 2016), CASTOR (Palumbo, NEJM, 2016), and MAIA (Facon, NEJM, 2019). Patients were divided into early and late response groups based on the median time to the response of interest. Modified PFS (mPFS) and OS (mOS) were calculated from the time of first response of interest. Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity was defined as less than 10 5 tumor cells by NGS assays. Results: After a median follow up of 16.1 months, 670 patients achieved a response of very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and 213 achieved MRD negativity. The median time to achieving VGPR or better was similar between NDMM and RRMM (86 vs. 84 days, respectively), while the median time to MRD negativity was longer among NDMM than RRMM (407 vs. 197 days, respectively). Among patients achieving VGPR or better, there was no significant difference of mPFS (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.69 to 1.44) (fig. a), duration of response (DOR) (HR 1.02, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.53) (fig. b), or mOS (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.54 to 1.75) (fig. c) between early and late responders. In the subgroup analysis, no significant difference of DOR was observed across all prespecified groups, including sex, age, cytogenetic risk groups, lines of previous therapy, types of measurable disease, NDMM vs. RRMM, prior treatment with autologous hematopoietic cell transplant, immunomodulatory drugs, or proteasome inhibitors. Among patients with NDMM achieving MRD negativity, there was no significant difference of mPFS (p=0.66) (fig. d), DOR (p=0.21) (fig. e) or mOS (p=0.87) (fig. f) between early and late responders. However, among patients with RRMM achieving MRD negativity, late responders had significantly longer mPFS (p=0.038) (fig. g) and DOR (p=0.043) (fig. h) than early responders; mOS was not significantly different (fig. i). In the multivariable Cox analysis among patients achieving MRD negativity, only lower baseline LDH level, NDMM, and IgG type MM were independently associated with later response. Conclusions: For patients with NDMM or RRMM achieving VGPR or better, early and late responders had similar survival; for patients with RRMM achieving MRD negativity, late responders had significantly longer mPFS and DOR. Our data support that in patients who failed to achieve an early or deep response to daratumumab based regimens, therapies should be continued with the goal of achieving ongoing and stepwise improvement of response. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 Levels Are Directly Correlated with Neoangiogenesis and Are Prognostic Factors in Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4866-4866
Author(s):  
Luciana Correa Oliveira de Oliveira ◽  
Juliana Alves Uzuelli ◽  
Ana Paula Alencar de Lima Lange ◽  
Barbara Amelia Aparecida Santana-Lemos ◽  
Marcia Sueli Baggio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4866 Background Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignant disease, characterized by increased angiogenesis in the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment and aberrant BM metabolism. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases implicated in tumour progression, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis, via proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrix. MMPs are inhibited by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMP). Although recent studies have implicated MMP 9 in MM bone disease, little is known about the role of the TIMPs. Objectives a) to compare levels of sRANKL, OPG, MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, VEGF, bFGF, microvessel density (MVD) between newly diagnosed MM patients and healthy controls; b) to determine the association of these molecules with disease progression, bone disease and neoangiogenesis and c) to evaluate the impact of these variables on survival. Patients and Methods As of July 2009 38 newly diagnosed and untreated multiple myeloma patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 61years-old (range 39-91) with 24 (63%) males. Patients were diagnosed and categorized according The International Myeloma Working Group criteria and ISS, respectively. Bone involvement was graded according to standard X-ray: patients with no lesions, or with one/ two bones involved or diffuse osteoporosis were classified as low score, whereas patients with lesions in more than two bones or presence of bone fracture were classified as high score. MMP-2 and MMP-9 were determined by PAGE gelatin zymography from plasma as previously described. MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2, OPG and sRANKL concentrations were measured by ELISA. The levels of VEGF, bFGF were obtained using cytometric bead array. Ten healthy volunteers were used as controls. Bone marrow MVD measured in hotspots was evaluated in 26 out of 38 patients at diagnosis and 15 patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma stage IA and IIA (used as controls) by staining immunohistochemically for CD34. Comparisons among groups were analyzed by ANOVA and the correlation by the Spearman's correlation coefficient. Cox regression were performed for overall survival (OS) analysis. Results Patients with MM had elevated TIMP-1, TIMP-2 and OPG values compared with controls. No significant difference was found between plasma sRANKL, pro-MMP2, pro-MMP9 and MMP-9 levels. We found that plasma TIMP-1 levels correlated positively with bFGF, VEGF, MVD, beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) and OPG (r: 0.514, p=0,001, r: 0.350, p=0,031; r: 0.610, p<0.0001; r: 0.760, p<0.0001 and r: 0.701, p<0.0001, respectively) and TIMP-2 levels with bFGF, DMV, B2M and OPG (r: 0.512, p=0.002; r: 0.595, p<0.0001; r: 0.587, p<0.0001 and r: 0.552, p<0.0001, respectively). TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 levels correlated with the ISS stage (p<0.0001, p=0.006, respectively). The only variables that correlated with clinical bone disease staging were hemoglobin, B2M and albumin levels, whereas TIMP-1, TIMP-2, bFGF, VEGF and OPG correlated with DMV. On the univariate analyses, age, gender, proMMP2, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, creatinine, B2M and MVD were significantly associated with overall survival. In Cox regression model, TIMP-1, TIMP-2 and B2M levels remained to be significantly associated with OS. In conclusion, our results suggest that TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 levels are strongly associated with neoangiogenesis and are independent prognostic factors in MM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A Better Mobilization Regimen for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4051-4051
Author(s):  
Ahmed Y Abuabdou ◽  
Eric R Rosenbaum ◽  
Saad Usmani ◽  
Bart Barlogie ◽  
Michele Cottler-Fox
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Optimal Number ◽  
P Value ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
Poor Mobilizer

Abstract Abstract 4051 Introduction: What constitutes an acceptable mobilization regimen for collecting CD34+ cells depends on whether the goal of collection is to obtain a minimum number versus optimal number of cells. When treating patients with high-risk myeloma it may be important to obtain an optimal number. Here we compare retrospectively our earlier mobilization regimen, VTD-PACE, with MVTD-PACE in newly diagnosed, previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. Materials and Methods : We reviewed data for all patients who collected hematopoietic progenitor cells on Total Therapy protocols TT3a/TT3b with VTD-PACE (n=394) from February 2004 to September 2008 (138 females and 256 males, median age 59y; range 31–75), and on TT4/TT5 with MVTD-PACE (n=188) from August 2008 to May 2011 (78 females and 110 males, median age 61y, range 30–76). Based on their predicted first day collection with a large volume leukapheresis (30L processed), using our center's predictive formula (Blood 2010; 116(21):1182a), patients were stratified into 4 mobilizer types: poor (<2×106 CD34+ cells/kg), intermediate (≥2 to 10×106), good (>10 to 20×106) and excellent (>20×106). Variables examined included number of CD34+ cells/μl blood on day 1 and day 2 of collection (we have a minimum 2 day collection requirement), number of collection days to reach our minimum goal of 20×106 CD34+ cells/kg, and total CD34+ cells/kg collected for both chemotherapy groups. Variables for both groups stratified by mobilizer type were compared using two-tailed student's t-tests, except for the poor mobilizer group, where population size was too small for formal statistical analyses (VTD-PACE n=7, MVTD-PACE n=4), although averages were calculated. Results : There was no significant difference between VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE for CD34+ cells/μl blood on day 1 of collection among the excellent [mean 368.9 (n=184) vs. 434.6 x106 (n=92); p-value 0.07], good [mean 138.6 (n=102) vs. 128.6 x106 (n=40); p-value 0.19], and intermediate [mean 60.1 (n=100) vs. 55.9 x106 (n=52); p-value 0.39] groups. A statistically significant difference between VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE was found for CD34+ cells/μl blood on day 2 of collection for excellent mobilizers [mean 333.8 (n=184) vs. 460 ×106 (n=92); p-value <0.001], but not for the good [mean 165.7 (n=102) vs. 189.5×106 (n=40); p-value 0.21] and intermediate [mean 80.1 (n=101) vs. 102.3 ×106 (n=52); p-value 0.07] groups. When CD34+ cell/kg collection totals with VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE were compared, a significant difference was seen for the intermediate mobilizer group only [mean 23.6 (n=101) vs. 26.3 ×106 (n=52); p-value 0.03]. For the poor mobilizer group, VTD-PACE had an average CD34+ cells/μl blood of 13.5×106 for day 1 of collection and 17.0 ×106 for day 2, with a total of 14.5×106 CD34+cells/kg collected; while MVTD-PACE had an average of 13.2×106 CD34+ cells/μl blood for day 1 of collection, 24.9×106 for day 2, with a total of 24.2×106CD34+ cells/kg collected. The number of collection days was similar between VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE in the excellent mobilization group (2 days), but was slightly more for VTD-PACE compared to MVTD-PACE for the good (2.1 vs. 2 days), intermediate (3.2 vs. 2.9 days), and poor (6.1 vs. 5.8 days) groups. Conclusion : Both regimens allow more than minimum collections, but MVTD-PACE provides a higher peak number of CD34+ cells/μl blood, resulting in a slightly lower mean number of days of collection than VTD-PACE to reach an optimal collection. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Long Term Response To Lenalidomide With and Without Continuous Therapy Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3209-3209
Author(s):  
Taxiarchis Kourelis ◽  
Shaji K Kumar ◽  
Geetika Srivastava ◽  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Martha Q Lacy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Introduction Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug that is active in newly diagnosed as well as relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The goal of this study is to describe patients with newly diagnosed MM remaining on lenalidomide for more than 3 years (long term responders) as well as patients that after discontinuing lenalidomide were able to maintain disease control while only on observation (LenO group). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 283 patients with newly diagnosed MM that were treated with lenalidomide between January 2003 and January 2011. We excluded patients that underwent early autologous stem cell transplant (n=102) or had less than 3 years of follow-up (n=6), leaving 175 patients for the current analysis. Results Long term responders Thirty-three patients (19%) received lenalidomide for more than 3 years. When compared to patients receiving lenalidomide for less than 3 years, at baseline, long term responders were more likely to have standard risk disease (64% versus 44%, p=0.03) and less likely to have high risk disease (18% versus 4%, p=0.04). They were more likely to have achieved a deeper response (VGPR versus PR, p<0.001) and had a longer median time to best response (6 versus 4 months, p<0.001). When considering the 12 patients who received lenalidomide for more than 5 years, this group was more likely to have achieved a deeper response (CR versus PR, p<0.0001) and had a longer median time to achieving best response (9 versus 4 months, p<0.0001) than those 163 patients who remained on lenalidomide for fewer than 5 years. Observation group Thirty-three patients (19%) discontinued lenalidomide for reasons other than progression and were observed without receiving further treatment (LenO group). Prior to moving to observation, five patients had received lenalidomide for more than three years. Indications for stopping in the LenO group included: prolonged disease stability (n= 20); and toxicity (n=13). The only differences in baseline characteristics between the LenO group and patients that were not observed off any treatment was depth of response, with 61% (n=20) of LenO in VGPR or better versus 23% (n=23) in the remainder, p=0.0003. Median PFS from the time of discontinuing lenalidomide was significantly longer in those patients who took lenalidomide for more than 1 year (n=24) when compared to patients taking it for less than one year (n=9) (median PFS off therapy was 38.5 months versus, 14.9 months log rank 0.08; Wilcoxon p<0.05), figure 1a; PFS for those treated for 1-2 years (n=11) as compared to 2 years or greater (n= 13) were comparable to each other (data not shown). Among those taking lenalidomide for at least a year, PFS from time of discontinuing lenalidomide was superior in patients who had achieved a VGPR/CR (n=20) as compared to those who achieved only a PR (n=13) (Median 48.4 months versus 14.8 months, log-rank p<0.05; Wilcoxon p=0.01), figure 1b. Conclusion Approximately one out of five patients with newly diagnosed MM can achieve responses lasting more than three years while on treatment with lenalidomide. Patients with standard risk FISH and those achieving at least VGPR are more likely be long-term responders. Furthermore, long-term responders were more likely to be slow responders. We also demonstrate that suspension of lenalidomide therapy after 1 year among those patients achieving a VGPR or better can result in long-term disease control and can be considered as a therapeutic strategy. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gertz:Celgene: Honoraria. Lacy:Celgene: Honoraria. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Research dollars Other.

scholarly journals Bortezomib: Once-Weekly 1.6mg/m2 Maybe a Better Choice Compared with Twice-Weekly 1.3mg/m2 in Newly Dignosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5558-5558
Author(s):  
Yubin Li ◽  
Fangfang Li ◽  
Wangshan Song ◽  
Zhumei Zhan ◽  
Xiangxin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Clinical Observation ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Combined Chemotherapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Induction Regimen

Background: The first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, Bortezomib - based chemotherapy significantly improved the symptoms of multiple myeloma and delayed disease progression. Although the NCCN guidelines recommend twice-weekly 1.3mg/m2, the most appropriate dosage and interval still need to be further observed to improve the tolerability and patients outcomes. Methods: Part I Clinical Observation of MM Therapy in real world The effectiveness and toxicity of bortezomib containing regimen on multiple myeloma (MM) were analyzed retrospectively. From August 2006 to July 2012, 113 MM patients(77 newly diagnosed, and 36 relapsed or refractory patients ) had previously received at least 2 courses of different combined chemotherapy regiments, including 2 patients relapsed after ASCT). Classification: The clinical charateristics of all the 113 MM patients were shown inTable 1. They had received minimal 2 cycles of either Classical VDT regimen (bortezomib 1.0-1.3mg/m2, d1, d8, d15, d22; thalidomide 100-200 mg/d, d1-d14; dexamethasone 20 mg d1, d2, d4, d5, d8, d9, d11, d21; 21 days per cycle) or VDT-A regimen (VTD regimens like the previous; Epirubicin 10mg/d, d1-d4; 21 days per cycle) or modified VTD regimen (bortezomib 1.6mg/m2, d1, d8, d15, d22; thalidomide 100-200 mg/d, d1-d21; dexamethasone 20 mg d1, d2, d8, d9, d15, d16, d22, d23; 35 days per cycle). Results: Of all the patients, 76 were treated with classical VDT regimen, 21 patients treated with VDT-A regimen, 16 patients treated with modified VTD regimen. All were assessed every 2 cycles. After the treatment of four cycles,the rates of overall response ( ORR) and the complete rate ( CR) for the above three regimens of bortezomib with thalidomide and dexamethasone were 77.9% and 28% respectively. As shown in Figure 1, there was no statistical difference of ORRs (77.9% vs 78.3% vs 71%) and CRs (28% vs 26.4 vs 30%) among our single-central (Qilu) and other two international clinical trials ( WOBS and VISTA). Part II Clinical observation of once-weekly 1.6mg/m2 and the twice-weekly 1.3mg/m2 bortezomib in BCD regimen. In the subsequent study, the effectiveness and toxicity of once-weekly 1.6mg/m2 and the twice-weekly 1.3mg/m2 bortezomib of BCD regimen on MM were analyzed retrospectively. From January 2016 to December 2018, 34 NDMM patients (the median age of 58 (35-78) years old) received minimal 4 cycles of 1.6mg/m2 bortezomib, d1, d8, d15, d22; cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 d1, d8, d15; dexamethasone 20 mg d1, d2, d8, d9, d15, d16, d22, d23; 35 days per cycle. 32 NDMM patients (the median age of 58.5 (27-74) years old) received minimal 4 cycles of 1.3mg/m2 ( bortezomib 1.3mg/m2, d1, d4, d8, d11; cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 d1, d15; dexamethasone 20 mg d1, d2, d4, d5, d8, d9, d11, d12; 21 days per cycle). All were assessed every 2 cycles. The clinical charateristics were shown inTable 2. Results: As shown in Table 3 and Figure 2, the analysis showed that there is no significant difference of effectiveness ORR (=1.941,P=0.164) and CR (=0.289,P=0.591) between the 1.6 mg/m2 group and the 1.3 mg/m2 group after 2 cycles of treatments, which 88.24% (30/34) patients achieved ORR and 5.88% (2/34) patients got CR in the 1.6 mg/m2 group and 75.0%(24/32) patients achieved ORR with 3.1% (1/32) patients in CR in the 1.3 mg/m2 group. After 4 cycles of treatment, the 1.6 mg/m2 group showed significantly higher CR as compared to the 1.3 mg/m2 group (44.1% vs 18.75%, =4.890, p=0.027), however with no statistical difference of ORRs between the two groups (82.35% vs 87.59%, =0.340, P=0.560). In the adverse events, there is no significant difference of peripheral neuropathy (PN) between the 1.6 mg/m2 group and the 1.3 mg/m2 group after 2 cycle treatments (=0.068, p=/0.794). However, the incidence of PN in 4 cycle assessment is lower significantly in the 1.6mg/m2 group than in the 1.3mg/m2 group (5.88% vs 31.25%, =7.131, p=0.008). In respect to hematologic, infective, gastrointestinal toxicities, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. Conclusions: In summary, the 1.6 mg/m2 group achieved deeper and quicker response with reduced PN than the 1.3mg/m2 group in after 4-cycle induction regimen, suggesting more effective and safer outcomes with the treatment of the 1.6mg/m2 BCD regiment on MM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A Phase 1 Study of Total Marrow Irradiation Combined with High-Dose Melphalan for Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4646-4646
Author(s):  
Pritesh R. Patel ◽  
Annie L. Oh ◽  
Matthew Koshy ◽  
Bulent Aydogan ◽  
Karen Sweiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Marrow Irradiation ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract High dose melphalan at 200mg/m2(Mel200) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) prolongs the survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) although it does not prevent relapse. Enhancing the anti-myeloma effect of pre-transplant conditioning without increasing toxicity is an important goal. To this purpose, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can be used to deliver radiation to the marrow (total marrow irradiation, TMI) while sparing other organs. Here we tested the safety of combining linear accelerator based TMI to Mel200 in a phase 1, 3+3 trial. Twelve patients with MM who relapsed after at least one line of therapy were enrolled in 3 dose cohorts (3Gy, 6Gy and 9Gy). Prior ASCT was permitted. All patients received Mel200 over 2 days. In addition, 1.5Gy TMI was administered twice daily for 1, 2 or 3 days depending on dose cohort. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as the occurrence of any NCI-CTCAE grade 4/5 non-hematologic toxicity or failure to engraft prior to day 30 after ASCT. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the FACT-BMT scale at baseline and 90-100 days after ASCT. Three groups of patients were enrolled and received 3Gy (n=3), 6Gy (n=3) or 9Gy (n=6). Median age at time of transplant was 66 years (range 40-71). Three patients had high risk FISH/ karyotype as defined by IMWG criteria. Median lines of prior therapy was 2 (range 1-4). Five patients (42%) had undergone prior autologous transplant. Of eleven patients (92%) who received prior lenalidomide, 7 (58%) were considered lenalidomide refractory. Similarly, of 11 (92%) patients previously treated with bortezomib, 6 (50%) were considered refractory. Eleven patients had a pre-transplant PET scan performed with 8 (73%) having skeletal PET avidity. All patients received TMI as scheduled. The mean reduction in dose to organs at risk (lens, oral cavity, kidneys, liver, bowels, lung) ranged from 25-63%. Median time to neutrophil (greater than 0.5x109/L) and platelet (greater than 20x109/L) engraftment were 10 (range 9-15) and 13 (range 9-17) days respectively. There were no dose limiting toxicities. Five patients experienced a total of 7 NCI CTCAE grade 3 toxicities including: diarrhea, n=2; mucositis, n=3; and nausea, n=2. Four of 6 patients who received 9Gy did not experience any toxicity greater than grade 2. Using the FACT-BMT scale, we observed that there was no significant difference in QoL between baseline and day 90 assessments. At day 100 overall response rate was 82% with 5 patients (45%) achieving a complete response. Four of 6 patients in the 9Gy cohort achieved at least a very good partial response. With a median follow up of 314 days, all patients were alive and only 4 patients (33%) relapsed. In this phase 1 trial we showed that TMI at 9Gy can be safely added to Mel200 without an increase in transplant related toxicities. Initial promising clinical results, even in high risk MM patients, will be further tested in a phase 2 study. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation after Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in 324 Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma: A Single-Center Study at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5824-5824
Author(s):  
Radwan Massoud ◽  
Rita Assi ◽  
Elie Fares ◽  
Nabila Kreidieh ◽  
Rami Mahfouz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cmv Reactivation ◽  
Center Study

Abstract CONTEXT: Cytomegalovirus reactivation (R-CMV) is often diagnosed in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and could determine a CMV-related disease in these immunocompromised patients, involving any organ. R-CMV and end-organ disease after ASCT has not been studied thoroughly. Autograft recipients are generally considered to have low risk of R-CMV or end-organ disease. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of R-CMV in adult patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing ASCT. DESIGN: Retrospective single center study. SETTING: This study was approved by the institutional review board of AUBMC and conducted at our institution PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 324 consecutive ASCT were performed at AUBMC between January 2005 and March 2016. All patients and transplant-related characteristics are listed on Table 1. CMV DNA load in blood was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) weekly as a routine monitoring strategy in all patients. Irrespective of PCR results, some patients suspected to have gastrointestinal involvement were biopsied. Also, in the presence of symptomatic CMV reactivation, appropriate anti-CMV therapy was instituted. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcome is understanding the potential relationship between R-CMV and Overall Survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included the effect of CMV reactivation on transplant related mortality (TRM), and progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Overall, 53 (16%) patients had R-CMV and 38 (72%) required anti-CMV treatment. Five (1,5%) had CMV disease with positive PCR on colon biopsy, yet two had PCR negative in blood. After a median follow up of 21.5 months (range: 1 to 125 months), there was no significant difference in OS or PFS between patients with or without R-CMV. TRM has increased from 1.1% in patients with no R-CMV to 13% in patients with R-CMV (P=0.003). We didn't observe any impact for age, sex, type of disease, pre-transplant treatment types/lines on the incidence R-CMV following ASCT. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that R-CMV is not uncommon in ASCT recipients and may contribute to increased TRM. Biopsy is recommended in case of high suspicion of R-CMV irrespective of PCR results. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Daratumumab plus RVd for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the safety run-in cohort of GRIFFIN

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1092-1096
Author(s):  
Peter M. Voorhees ◽  
Cesar Rodriguez ◽  
Brandi Reeves ◽  
Nitya Nathwani ◽  
Luciano J. Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Best Response

Abstract The phase 2 GRIFFIN study of daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) for transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma included a safety run-in phase followed by a randomized phase. The ongoing randomized phase has met its prespecified primary end point of an improved stringent complete response (sCR) rate after consolidation for D-RVd (reported elsewhere). Final analysis of the safety run-in cohort is reported herein and provides longer follow-up (median, 40.8 months) encompassing daratumumab plus lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance therapy. Patients in the safety run-in cohort (N = 16) received 4 induction cycles (D-RVd), high-dose melphalan supported by autologous stem cell transplant, 2 consolidation cycles (D-RVd), and 24 months of maintenance (D-R). By the end of consolidation, all patients had responded, with a best response of sCR in 9 (56.3%) patients; 8 (50.0%) patients were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative (10‒5 threshold). After maintenance, 15 (93.8%) patients had achieved a best response of sCR, and 13 (81.3%) patients were MRD (10‒5) negative. Estimated 36-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 78.1% and 93.8%, respectively. One death from progressive disease occurred in the patient who did not achieve sCR. Observed safety profiles were consistent with daratumumab and RVd. With &gt;3 years of median follow-up, D-RVd achieved durable responses that deepened with D-R maintenance. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02874742.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Upfront Daratumumab Combination Regimen in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3158-3158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyaw Zin Thein ◽  
Thura Win Htut ◽  
Myint Aung Win ◽  
Sriman Swarup ◽  
Anita Sultan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Standard Risk

Introduction: Management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), which accounts for 1% of all cancers, is an area in dire need of therapeutic innovation. In recent years, the introduction of novel agents is one of the major advances in the management of patients with NDMM, in both transplant- eligible and transplant- ineligible candidates. Studies have combined daratumumab, a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody that targets CD38 which is highly expressed on myeloma cells, with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents-based regimens in the first-line treatment of NDMM. The purpose of our study is to explore and consolidate the efficacy of upfront daratumumab combination regimen in patients with NDMM. Methods: We systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE databases and meeting abstracts from inception through June 2019. Phase III RCTs utilizing daratumumab in patients with newly diagnosed/ untreated multiple myeloma were incorporated in the analysis. A generic inverse variance method was used to calculate the estimated pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) for overall response rate (ORR), including stringent complete response (sCR), CR and very good partial response (VGPR). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q -statistic. Random effects model was applied. Results: Three phase III RCTs with a total of 2,528 patients with NDMMwere included.Studies compared daratumumab (D) + bortezomib (V) + melphan (M) + prednisone (P) vs VMP, D + lenalidomide (R) + dexamethasone (d) vs Rd, and DVd + thalidomide (T) vs VTd. The randomization ratio was 1:1 in all studies. The I2statistic for heterogeneity was 0, suggesting homogeneity among RCT. The pooled HR for PFS was statistically significant at 0.52 (95% CI: 0.44-0.61; P < 0.0001). The PFS benefit was observed in all ISS categories, types of immunoglobulin (Ig) and standard risk cytogenetic; ISS I cohort (HR, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.37- 0.82; P = 0.003), ISS II cohort (HR, 0.43; 95% CI: 0.33- 0.55; P < 0.0001), ISS III cohort (HR, 0.63; 95% CI: 0.48- 0.82; P = 0.0006), IgG cohort (HR, 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40- 0.77; P = 0.0003), non-IgG cohort (HR, 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28- 0.97; P = 0.04), and standard risk cytogenetic cohort (HR, 0.43; 95% CI: 0.35- 0.53; P < 0.0001). The pooled HR for PFS in high risk cytogenetic cohort was not statistically significant at 0.76 (95% CI: 0.53- 1.10; P = 0.15). The pooled RR for ORR was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.01-1.26; P = 0.03), sCR was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.33-3.08; P = 0.001), CR was 1.46 (95% CI: 1.20-1.79; P = 0.0002),and VGPR was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.82-1.25; P = 0.93). The pooled RR for negative minimal residual disease (MRD) was 2.54 (95% CI: 1.24-5.20; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Upfront combination regimen with daratumumab significantly improved PFS, ORR, sCR and CR along with negative MRD, compared to control arm in patients with NDMM. The improvement in PFS was noted across all subgroups except in high-risk cytogenetic group. More randomized studies are required to explore further novel agents and to formulate optimal combination regimen to improve survival in this high-risk cytogenetic subset. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document