Rational Targets in Systemic AL Amyloidosis

Abstract Introduction Dysproteinemia refers to a spectrum of gammopathies in which an aberrant clone(s) of late stage B lymphoid cells or plasma cells produces monoclonal immunoglobulins and/or fragments. The spectrum includes incidentally noted benign conditions like monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to life threatening diseases such as multiple myeloma (MM) and systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Exploitation of normal plasma cell biology forms the basis of treatments used in both MM and AL amyloidosis. In recent years, immunotherapeutic strategies targeting plasma cells have redefined the treatment landscape of MM and could be particularly useful in AL amyloidosis which is distinguished by a low burden of less proliferative disease and a paucity of high risk genetics. We sought to characterize the expression of potentially clinically relevant and/or immunotherapeutic targets in amyloidogenic plasma cells. Methods All patients diagnosed with systemic AL amyloidosis at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, who had unstained bone marrow samples were identified. Decalcified formalin fixed paraffin embedded bone marrow biopsy sections were stained for G protein-coupled receptor, class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), Cyclin D1 (CCND1), B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) expression using standard laboratory developed Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in a CLIA compliant setting. We scored the biopsies for percentage expression, and intensity of staining. We also obtained the demographic details, staging, and cytogenetic information for the patients from whom these samples were obtained. Results During the queried period, 32 unstained samples were available for testing from 27 unique patients. There were 27 diagnostic and 5 patients had additional samples from the time of relapse. The median age was 63 years (range 41-73). 64% of patients were male and 75% had lambda restricted plasma cells. Cytogenetic abnormalities using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were reviewed, t(11;14) was seen in 38% samples. The median clonal PC burden in BM at diagnosis was 10% (range 2-80%) and 36% had >10% plasma cells. In clonal PCs, the median BCL2 expression was 100% (range 80-100%) with a staining intensity of 2 (range 1-3). 84% (27) samples had BCL2 expression meeting threshold used in the Bellini study. CCND1 expression could be tested in 16 samples median expression 100% (range 20-100%) and median staining intensity 2 (range 1-3). Patients with CCND1 expression also had 100% BCL2 staining. GPRC5D expression was available in 18 samples and all samples tested expressed GPRC5D with median 80% (range 30-100%) with median intensity 1 (range 1-3). BCMA expression was available for 25 samples, with median expression 80% (range 50-100%) with a median staining intensity 2 (range 1-3). Among the five patients with samples from diagnosis and relapse, samples retained their expression of BCL2, BCMA, and GPRC5D. Among samples with t(11;14) by FISH, 92% expressed BCL2 (per Bellini study) and 58% expressed CCND1. Conclusion Cell surface expression of novel targets has enabled the development of several efficacious therapeutic strategies in MM. Amyloidogenic plasma cells express GPRC5D, BCMA and BCL2. Our data provides the rationale for careful investigation and development of targeted agents (BCL2 inhibitors, e.g.venetoclax) and immunotherapeutic strategies directed at GPRC5D and BCMA in AL amyloidosis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Dogan: Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Peer View: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Physicians' Education Resource: Honoraria; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy. Hassoun: Celgene, Takeda, Janssen: Research Funding. Mailankody: Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb/Juno: Research Funding; Plexus Communications: Honoraria; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Evicore: Consultancy; Jansen Oncology: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding. Giralt: SANOFI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JENSENN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JAZZ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELGENE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinnum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Landau: Takeda: Research Funding; Genzyme: Honoraria; Takeda, Janssen, Caelum Biosciences, Celgene, Pfizer, Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

First Description of B Cell Maturation Antigen Expression in Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127332 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5452-5452

Author(s):

Susan Bal ◽

Allison Sigler ◽

Alexander Chan ◽

David J. Chung ◽

Ahmet Dogan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Staining Intensity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Light Chain Amyloidosis ◽

B Cell Maturation

Background B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a transmembrane protein belonging to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily involved in the regulation of B cell proliferation and survival as well as maturation/differentiation into plasma cells. In multiple myeloma cells, overexpression of BCMA has been shown to activate mitogen activated protein kinase pathways (AKT, ERK1/2, and NF-κB) and upregulates anti-apoptotic proteins (MCL1, BCL2, BCL-xL) resulting in cellular proliferation. Immunotherapeutic strategies targeting BCMA are showing great promise in heavily pre-treated refractory multiple myeloma. Light Chain Amyloidosis (AL) is a multisystem disorder of clonal plasma cells that results in the production of an abnormal light chain which misfolds and deposits in the organs leading to disruption of tissue architecture, cellular stress, dysfunction and eventually, death. The smaller burden and lower proliferative potential of the offending clonal plasma cells in amyloidosis may potentially lend itself favorably to immunotherapeutic strategies targeting BCMA. Given the efficacy of this approach in MM, the evaluation of BCMA expression on the surface of amyloidogenic plasma cells is warranted. Methods All patients diagnosed with Light chain Amyloidosis at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, who had unstained bone marrow samples were identified. These unstained BM biopsy samples were prospectively stained for BCMA expression using Immunohistochemistry (IHC). We utilized a clinical-grade assay (clone D6; catalog sc-390147; company Santa-Cruz; monoclonal antibody; dilution 1:400) in a CLIA compliant setting. We scored the biopsies for BCMA expression, intensity, and site of staining. We also obtained their demographic details, staging, and cytogenetic information for the patients with available samples. Results During the queried period, 28 unstained samples were available for testing from the time of disease diagnosis. The median age of the population was 63 years (range 41-73). 64% of patients were male and consistent with the literature; a majority of patients (75%) had lambda-typic clonal plasma cells. Cytogenetic abnormalities using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were reviewed, t(11;14) was seen in 36% patients, and chromosome 1q and del 13q were each seen in 32% of patients. No patient had t(4;14) or del 17p. The median clonal PC burden in BM at diagnosis was 10% (range2-80%) and 36% had > 10% plasma cells. In clonal PCs, the median BCMA expression was 80% (range 20-100%). Only one patient had a staining intensity under 50% (20%). Membranous staining was noted in 82% of patients and a Golgi pattern in 11%. The median staining intensity was 2 (range 1-3). Of the patients with baseline diagnostic samples available for testing, six patients had additional unstained bone marrow samples for staining at the time of relapse. The majority of patients (83%) who relapsed had >10% plasma cells with a higher median plasma cell burden of 35% (range 10-80). The median BCMA expression was 65% (range 50-80) with no patient having <50% expression. The staining pattern was membranous in 50%, Golgi in 17%, and Golgi-membranous in 33%. At the time of relapse, the median clonal PC burden was 13% (range 5-30). BCMA expression continued to be present at the time of relapse with a median 75% (range 50-100) with predominantly membranous staining (83%). The median staining intensity in both diagnostic and relapsed tissue within the six samples studied was 1. Conclusions Our study represents the first description of BCMA expression on the surface of amyloidogenic plasma cells to our knowledge. BCMA is uniformly expressed by pathologic PCs in AL amyloidosis both at the time of diagnosis and relapse. Given the efficacy of BCMA directed therapy in multiple myeloma, further investigation of these agents in light-chain amyloidosis are warranted and may provide an effective therapeutic strategy in this devastating disease. Figure Disclosures Dogan: Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Giralt:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Hassoun:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Landau:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

In Vitro and inVivo Activity of Melflufen in Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125952 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3100-3100 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ken Flanagan ◽

Muntasir M Majumder ◽

Romika Kumari ◽

Juho Miettinen ◽

Ana Slipicevic ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Advisory Committees

Background: Immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease caused by plasma cell secretion of misfolded light chains that assemble as amyloid fibrils and deposit on vital organs including the heart and kidneys, causing organ dysfunction. Plasma cell directed therapeutics, aimed at preferentially eliminating the clonal population of amyloidogenic cells in bone marrow are expected to reduce production of toxic light chain and alleviate deposition of amyloid thereby restoring healthy organ function. Melphalan flufenamide ethyl ester, melflufen, is a peptidase potentiated alkylating agent with potent toxicity in myeloma cells. Melflufen is highly lipophilic, permitting rapid cellular uptake, and is subsequently enzymatically cleaved by aminopeptidases within cells resulting in augmented intracellular concentrations of toxic molecules, providing a more targeted and localized treatment. Previous data demonstrating multiple myeloma plasma cell sensitivity for melflufen suggests that the drug might be useful to directly eliminate amyloidogenic plasma cells, thereby reducing the amyloid load in patients. Furthermore, the increased intracellular concentrations of melflufen in myeloma cells indicates a potential reduction in systemic toxicity in patients, an important factor in the fragile amyloidosis patient population. To assess potential efficacy in amyloidosis patients and to explore the mechanism of action, we examined effects of melflufen on amyloidogenic plasma cells invitro and invivo. Methods: Cellular toxicity and apoptosis were measured in response to either melflufen or melphalan in multiple malignant human plasma cell lines, including the amyloidosis patient derived light chain secreting ALMC-1 and ALMC-2 cells, as well as primary bone marrow cells from AL amyloidosis patients, using annexin V and live/dead cell staining by multicolor flow cytometry, and measurement of cleaved caspases. Lambda light chain was measured in supernatant by ELISA, and intracellular levels were detected by flow cytometry. To assess efficacy of melflufen in vivo, the light chain secreting human myeloma cell line, JJN3, was transduced with luciferase and adoptively transferred into NSG mice. Cell death in response to melflufen or melphalan was measured by in vivo bioluminescence, and serum light chain was monitored. Results: Melflufen demonstrated increased potency against multiple myeloma cell lines compared to melphalan, inducing malignant plasma cell death at lower doses on established light chain secreting plasma cell lines. While ALMC-1 cells were sensitive to both melphalan and melflufen, the IC50 for melphalan at 960 nM was approximately 3-fold higher than melflufen (334 nM). However, ALMC-2 cells were relatively insensitive to melphalan (12600 nM), but maintained a 100-fold increase in sensitivity to melflufen (121 nM). Furthermore, while 40% of primary CD138+ plasma cells from patients with diagnosed AL amyloidosis responded to melflufen treatment in vitro, only 20% responded to melphalan with consistently superior IC50 values for melflufen (Figure 1). Light chain secreting cell lines and AL amyloidosis patient samples were further analyzed by single cell sequencing. We further examined differential effects on apoptosis and the unfolded protein response in vitro in response to either melflufen or melphalan. This is of particular interest in amyloidosis, where malignant antibody producing plasma cells possess an increased requirement for mechanisms to cope with the amplified load of unfolded protein and associated ER stress. As AL amyloidosis is ultimately a disease mediated by secretion of toxic immunoglobulin, we assessed the effects of melflufen on the production of light chain invitro, measuring a decrease in production of light chain in response to melflufen treatment. Finally, we took advantage of a recently described adoptive transfer mouse model of amyloidosis to assess the efficacy of melflufen and melphalan in eliminating amyloidogenic clones and reducing the levels of toxic serum light chain in vivo. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that melflufen mediated toxicity, previously described in myeloma cells, extends to amyloidogenic plasma cells and further affects the ability of these cells to produce and secrete toxic light chain. This data supports the rationale for the evaluation of melflufen in patients with AL amyloidosis. Figure 1 Disclosures Flanagan: Oncopeptides AB: Employment. Slipicevic:Oncopeptides AB: Employment. Holstein:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sorrento: Consultancy. Lehmann:Oncopeptides AB: Employment. Nupponen:Oncopeptides AB: Employment. Heckman:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Research Funding; Orion Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Difference in Involved and Uninvolved Free Light Chain (dFLC) of Less Than 1mg/DL Early Post Risk Adapted Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (RA-ASCT) Predicts Renal Response at 1 Year in Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129195 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4577-4577

Author(s):

Sneha Purvey ◽

Kenneth Seier ◽

Sean M. Devlin ◽

Josel D Ruiz ◽

Molly A. Maloy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cardiac Involvement ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Organ Function ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Renal Response ◽

Hematologic Response

Background: Deep and durable hematologic remissions following RA-ASCT are associated with improved organ function and extended overall survival (OS) in AL amyloidosis. Achieving at least a very good partial response (VGPR) defined by a dFLC <4mg/dL is an accepted goal of therapy based on favorable outcomes, including improved renal survival (REF: Palladini JCO 2012, Palladini Blood 2014). Recently more profound clonal suppression as indicated by no evidence of minimal residual plasma cell disease (MRD) in bone marrow (BM) (Muchtar Blood 2017) and achieving dFLC <1mg/dL (Manwani Blood 2018) have shown additional benefit. While depth of hematologic response by standard criteria are important, this study assessed additional factors that influence renal response and time to renal response. Methods: All patients (pts) with AL and renal involvement (biopsy proven renal tissue diagnosis and/or 24hr proteinuria >500mg/day) undergoing RA-ASCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2016 were included. Pts with follow up less than 12 months post RA-ASCT, hemodialysis prior to RA-ASCT and Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia were excluded. Melphalan dose was assigned based on age, cardiac involvement and renal compromise (Landau Leukemia 2013). Hematologic response was assessed at 3 and 12 months (mos) post RA-ASCT (Palladini JCO 2012) and those with less than complete response (CR) were offered consolidation therapy with bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD). All pts underwent serial organ function assessment (Palladini Blood 2014). Logistic regression models were used to assess association with renal response by 12 mos. Covariates for adjustment in multivariate models were chosen based on univariate analyses and clinical relevance. Results: Sixty-four patients with renal AL meeting the inclusion criteria were identified; 3 pts died within a year post RA-ASCT were excluded. Median age (range) was 61 years (44-73), M:F 49%:51%, white 90% and 34% had cardiac involvement. Median (IQR) 24 hr proteinuria pre RA-ASCT was 5014 mg/day (2632-7514) and eGFR 68 ml/min/1.73 m2 (44-91). Renal amyloid stage I:II:III was 33%:52%:15%. Mayo cardiac stage (2004) I:II:III was 28%:61%:11% and revised Mayo stage (2012) I:II:III:IV was 13%:57%:21%:8%. Median BM plasma cells pre RA-ASCT was 9% (IQR 2-14%). 46% pts received treatment prior to ASCT. Melphalan dose (mg/m2) 200:140:100 was 44%:43%:11%. 46% pts received BD consolidation. Hematologic response at 3 mos post RA-ASCT was CR 44%, VGPR 29%, partial response (PR) 20% and stable disease (SD) 7%. MRD in BM by 10-color flow cytometry was assessed in 33 pts and 13 (39%) were MRD negative. dFLC <1mg/dL was achieved in 63% of pts. Renal response by 12 mos following RA-ASCT was achieved in 32 pts (53%). Median (IQR) time to renal response in these pts was 5.8 mos (5.1 - 11.3). Amongst renal responders, 50% were in CR, 53% had MRD negative BM (of 15 pts) and 78% with dFLC <1mg/dL early post RA-ASCT. In pts who achieved dFLC <1mg/dL early post RA-ASCT, 66% had renal response. By univariate analysis (Table 1) OR (95% CI) Mayo cardiac Stage (2004) II and III 0.23 (0.07-0.83, p=0.025), early post RA-ASCT dFLC <1mg/dL 3.00 ( 1.01-8.93, p=0.048), VGPR early post RA-ASCT 7.80 (1.69-36.06, p=0.009), dFLC <1mg/dL at 12 mos 7.20 (2.14-24.21, p=0.001) and CR at 12 mos 10.27 (1.14-92.26, p=0.038) were significantly associated with renal response. Neither renal stage, Mayo stage (2012), MRD negativity, melphalan dose nor consolidation was associated with renal response. By multivariate analysis (Table 2), early post RA-ASCT dFLC <1mg/dL continued to be the most significant factor predicting renal response, OR (95% CI) 4.52 (1.26-16.24, p=0.021), when adjusted for renal amyloid stage and Mayo cardiac stage (2004). Conclusion: In this single center study, we report that RA-ASCT results in renal response in more than half (53%) of the patients at 1 year. Achieving dFLC <1mg/dL early post ASCT is significantly associated with renal response. Renal response is independent of baseline proteinuria and BM plasma cells or MRD status post ASCT. Our study supports that pathologic entity in organ damage is not the plasma cells but rather light chains. Further studies using dFLC <1mg/dL should be evaluated in organ response. Mass spectrometric light chain monitoring may even be more sensitive and could potentially serve as a non-invasive way to measure disease burden. Disclosures Shah: Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Hassoun:Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Giralt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Landau:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Short Daratumumab Consolidation in Patients with AL Amyloidosis or Lcdd Improves Complete Response Rates and Modifies Bone Marrow Microenvironment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137353 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 25-25

Author(s):

Efstathios Kastritis ◽

Pantelis Roussakis ◽

Ioannis V Kostopoulos ◽

Foteini Theodorakakou ◽

Despina Fotiou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Primary Therapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematologic Response ◽

Short Course ◽

Before And After

A deep and profound hematologic response is associated with substantial improvement in the probability of improvement in organ function and survival in patients with AL amyloidosis or LCDD. Bortezomib-based therapy is the mainstay of anti-clonal therapy for AL amyloidosis and LCDD, however, hemCR is achieved in only 20% of patients. Daratumumab has shown to be active and able to induce rapid responses in patients with AL amyloidosis. Plasma cell clones in AL are small and indolent and further improvement of hematologic response could be achieved by consolidation strategies. Given the activity of daratumumab and the rapid induction of deep responses in AL amyloidosis, we treated patients with AL amyloidosis or LCDD , who had not achieved a hemCR after standard therapy, with a short course of daratumumab. In consenting patients, we evaluated MRD in the bone marrow (BM), before and after consolidation, by means of next generation multiparametric flow cytometry (NGF-MFC), using the Euroflow protocol. Thus, beyond the presence of MRD , we were able to evaluate also other components of the BM microenvironment and their changes before and after daratumumab. All patients were treated in the Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Athens, Greece. The study included patients who had achieved either PR or VGPR after completing standard bortezomib-based primary therapy. Consolidation included 4 weekly infusions of daratumumab 16 mg/kg. Pre-emptive therapy for IRR was given starting two days before the first infusion of daratumumab that included low dose steroids (equivalent of 16 mg of methylprednisolone), H1 & H2 inhibitors and montelukast. Twenty-five patients (20 with AL and 5 with LCDD) received daratumumab consolidation. Among patients with AL amyloidosis, median age is 65, kidneys and heart were involved in 70% and 75% respectively, baseline Mayo stage was 20%, 70% and 10% for stage 1,2 & 3 respectively. Baseline immunofixation in serum or urine was positive in all patients, median baseline dFLC at diagnosis was 125 mg/L (range 60-7228). Median time from start of first line therapy to daratumumab consolidation was 7 months and all patients had completed their planned therapy. At the time of initiation of daratumumab, 24 patients were in VGPR and one in PR and the median dFLC level was 12 mg/L; all had positive serum or urine immunofixation and in all patients MRD was detectable by NGF-MFC. Except for one patient, all the others received the planned 4 daratumumab infusion. Mild IRRs occurred in 3 patients (grade 1 in 2 and grade 2 in one patient); no IRRs occurred after the first infusion. One month after completion of consolidation with daratumumab, median dFLC dropped to 5 mg/L and 10 (40%) of the patients improved their response: 36% from VGPR to hemCR and one patient with PR to VGPR. Among those that achieved a hemCR, 5 (50%) became MRD negative by NGF-MFC. However, even among those that remained MRD-positive there was a decrease in the number of aberrant plasma cells (APCs) by a median of one log. In MRD-positive patients a change in the composition of the remaining phenotypic subclones of APCs was also observed. Regarding the other BM cell populations, we observed statistically significant changes in B-cell precursors (increased from 14.32%+/-11.75% to 34.76% +/-24.11%, p=0.0004), naïve B-cells (decreased from 65.58%+/-17.56% to 47.37%+/-22.66%, p=0.0003), T cells (increased from 6.44% +/- 2.78% to 10.86%+/- 6.407%, p=0.0007), CD27+ NK & NKT cells (increased from 15.65% +/-13.5% to 36.34%+/- 24.43%, p=0.0002), mast cells (increased from 0.0092%+/-0.0123% to 0.011%+/-0.012%, p=0.002) and erythroblasts (increased from 1.82%+/-0.97% to 2.41%+/- 1.03%, p=0.076). Due to the small numbers it was not possible to make meaningful comparison between MRD positive and negative patients. However, the above results indicate that even a short course of daratumumab was able to cause significant changes in the BM microenvironment of these patients. From this small prospective study we conclude that consolidation with a short course of daratumumab can improve the depth of response in patients with AL or LCDD that have not achieved a hemCR after primary therapy, even to the depth of undetected MRD. In addition, daratumumab causes significant changes in the BM environment, which need further investigation in order to understand their implications. Disclosures Kastritis: Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gavriatopoulou:Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Terpos:BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis pharma SA: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: daratumumab for AL amyloidosis

Download Full-text

Pre-Clinical Efficacy of Co-Treatment with KDM1A (LSD1) Inhibitor and Ruxolitinib or BET Inhibitor Against Post-MPN-sAML Blast Progenitor Cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130783 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1274-1274

Author(s):

Warren Fiskus ◽

Christopher Peter Mill ◽

Vrajesh Karkhanis ◽

Bernardo H Lara ◽

Prithviraj Bose ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Growth Inhibition ◽

Progenitor Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Amine Oxidase ◽

Genetic Alterations ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bet Inhibitor ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Differentiation Block

LSD1 (KDM1A) is an FAD-dependent amine-oxidase that demethylates mono and dimethyl histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4Me1 and H3K4Me2), which regulates active enhancers and transcription in AML stem/progenitor cells (LSCs). LSD1 is part of the repressor complexes involving HDACs, CoREST or GFI1, mediating transcriptional repression and differentiation block in LSCs that persist in the minimal residual disease (MRD) following attainment of clinical complete remission, leading to relapse and poor outcome in AML. In AML LSCs, genetic alterations and epigenetic dysregulation of enhancers affect levels of myeloid transcriptional regulators, including c-Myc, PU.1, GATA 2 and CEBPα, and their target genes, which are involved in differentiation block in LSCs. Our present studies demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of LSD1 in the AML OCI-AML5 cells significantly increased the permissive H3K4Me2/3-marked chromatin, reduced H3K27Ac occupancy at super-enhancers and enhancers (SEs/Es) (by ChIP-Seq), especially of c-Myc and CDK6, as well as repressed CoREST, c-Myc, CDK6, and c-KIT, while inducing p21, CD11b, and CD86 levels (log2 -fold change by RNA-Seq, and protein expression by Western analyses). This led to significant growth inhibition, differentiation and loss of viability of OCI-AML5 and patient-derived AML blasts (p < 0.01). Similar effects were observed following exposure of OCI-AML5 (96 hours) to tet-inducible shRNA to LSD1. Knock-down of GFI1 by shRNA (by 90%) also inhibited growth and induced differentiation, associated with upregulation of PU.1, p21 and CD11b levels. Treatment with irreversible (INCB059872, 0.25 to 1.0 µM) or reversible (SP2577, 1.0 to 2.0 µM) LSD1 inhibitor (LSD1i) inhibited binding of LSD1 to CoREST, and significantly induced growth inhibition, differentiation and loss of viability (over 96 hours) of the OCI-AML5, post-myeloproliferative neoplasm (post-MPN) sAML SET2 and HEL92.1.7 cells, as well as patient-derived AML and post-MPN sAML blasts (p < 0.01). Co-treatment with INCB059872 and ruxolitinib synergistically induced apoptosis of the post-MPN sAML SET2 and HEL92.1.7 cells and patient-derived CD34+ post-MPN sAML blasts (combination indices < 1.0). Notably, pre-treatment with the LSD1i for 48 hours significantly re-sensitized ruxolitinib-persister/resistant SET2 and HEL92.1.7 cells to ruxolitinib (p < 0.001). We previously reported that treatment with the BET inhibitor (BETi) JQ1 or OTX015 represses SE/E-driven AML-relevant oncogenes including MYC, RUNX1, CDK6, PIM1, and Bcl-xL, while inducing p21 and p27 levels in post-MPN sAML blasts (Leukemia 2017;31:678-687). This was associated with inhibition of colony growth and loss of viability of AML and post-MPN sAML blasts (p < 0.01). Here, we determined that INCB059872 treatment induced similar levels of lethality in BETi-sensitive or BETi-persister/resistant AML and post-MPN sAML cells. Since BETi treatment also depleted LSD1 protein levels, co-treatment with the BETi OTX015 and LSD1i INCB059872 or SP2577 induced synergistic lethality in AML and post-MPN sAML blasts (combination indices < 1.0). Co-treatment with INCB059872 (1.5 mg/kg) and OTX015 (50 mg/kg) both orally for 21 days, compared to each agent alone or vehicle control, significantly reduced the sAML burden and improved survival of immune-depleted mice engrafted with HEL92.1.7 or HEL92.1.7/OTX015-resistant-GFP/Luc sAML xenografts (p < 0.01). Collectively, these findings strongly support further in vivo testing and pre-clinical development of LSD1i-based combinations with ruxolitinib against post-MPN sAML and with BETi against AML or post-MPN sAML cells. Disclosures Bose: CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicine Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kartos: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kadia:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline RX: Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bhalla:Beta Cat Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Khoury:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Angle: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Ital Pharma: Research Funding; Pharma Essentia: Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma Corp: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Protaganist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Favorable Long-Term Outcomes after Daratumumab Discontinuation in AL Amyloidosis Patients Achieving Deep Responses

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124981 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1884-1884 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alfred Chung ◽

Gregory P. Kaufman ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

David Iberri ◽

Erik Eckhert ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Control Group ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Interval ◽

Significant Difference

Daratumumab (DARA) is a CD38-targeted antibody FDA-approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) and its efficacy has recently been demonstrated in the treatment of AL amyloidosis. DARA is conventionally given indefinitely until evidence of disease progression or intolerance for the treatment of MM. In AL amyloidosis, the optimal duration of therapy is not known, and patients may be treated indefinitely on maintenance, extrapolating from MM data. However, the plasma cell burden observed in AL amyloidosis is often lower than in MM, and thus certain patients achieving deep responses may have durable responses with time-limited treatment. Outcomes for patients who are observed after DARA discontinuation are not known. We report the outcomes of patients at our institution who received time-limited DARA. A retrospective analysis of AL amyloidosis patients treated at Stanford University from 2016 to 2019 with DARA monotherapy and dexamethasone for at least 2 months was performed, and patients who subsequently had DARA discontinued for reasons other than disease progression or lack of response were selected for the study. Hematologic responses were assessed by consensus guidelines. Duration on and off therapy were explored, along with time-to-next treatment or death (TTNT), defined as the time from DARA initiation to restarting/switching therapy or death. An exploratory analysis comparing TTNT between the study population and a control cohort who achieved hematologic CR and were maintained on DARA was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank testing. 67 patients received at least 2 months of DARA monotherapy and dexamethasone; among these, 15 patients discontinued therapy for reasons other than disease progression and were included. Median age was 66 years old and median lines of prior therapies was 4 (range: 1 - 6). Baseline difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) prior to DARA initiation was 2.6 mg/dL (range: 0 - 16.8 mg/dL). 10 of 15 patients had cardiac involvement with median NT-proBNP of 1982 pg/mL and 9 of 15 patients had renal involvement with median 24-hour proteinuria of 6.2 g and eGFR of 32 mL/min/1.73m2 at DARA initiation. Median duration from starting to stopping DARA was 7.8 months (range: 2 - 21 months). Median duration from achieving best hematologic response to stopping DARA was 3 months (range: 0 - 17 months). Reasons for discontinuation included: patient preference (5), fatigue/body aches (4), infection (2), other active medical comorbidities (3), and lack of perceived further benefit (1). At DARA discontinuation, median dFLC was 0.1 mg/dL (range: 0 - 2.2 mg/dL) and there were 12 hematologic CR, 1 VGPR, 1 PR, and 1 not assessable for response. Outcomes for all 15 patients are shown in Figure 1. The median treatment-free interval was 17.5 months (range: 5 - 34 months); estimated 2-year TTNT-free survival was 83% (95% CI: 61 - 100%). All 14 evaluable patients eventually achieved CR. 3 patients restarted DARA for rising dFLC, and all 3 patients demonstrated response to retreatment (2 achieving CR and 1 near PR with ongoing follow-up). There were 2 deaths. One patient with severe baseline cardiac amyloidosis developed sudden rise in dFLC after treatment-free interval of 21 months; although he rapidly achieved hematologic CR on retreatment, he died of heart failure within 2 months of restarting DARA. The other patient developed therapy-related AML while off therapy and underwent allogenic stem cell transplant but died of leukemia (censored for AL amyloidosis outcomes at transplant). There was no significant difference in the TTNT between the study group and a control group of 16 patients who achieved CR and were on continuous maintenance (Figure 2; p=0.807). AL amyloidosis patients achieving deep responses with DARA can have favorable outcomes after treatment discontinuation, including a long treatment-free interval. Although our sample size is small, the outcomes of these patients appeared comparable to those achieving CR on continuous DARA maintenance, and patients were able to regain responses when retreatment was necessary. These results suggest that DARA may be safely discontinued in patents achieving deep hematologic responses, which has significant implications for quality of life and financial burden of treatment. Future studies evaluating time-limited versus continuous DARA maintenance after achievement of deep responses are warranted. Disclosures Kaufman: Janssen: Other: travel/lodging, Research Funding. Liedtke:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; IQVIA/Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BlueBirdBio: Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Daratumumab for treatment of AL amyloidosis

Download Full-text

VTE Rates and Safety Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRD) with or without Rivaroxaban Prophylaxis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124403 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1835-1835 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Katrina M Piedra ◽

Hani Hassoun ◽

Larry W. Buie ◽

Sean M. Devlin ◽

Jessica Flynn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cancer Trial ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Increased Risk

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Outcomes and Organ Responses with Daratumumab Therapy in Previously Treated Patients with AL Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122152 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1828-1828

Author(s):

Alfred Chung ◽

Gregory P. Kaufman ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Erik Eckhert ◽

Stanley Schrier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cardiac Response ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Renal Response ◽

Cardiac Responses ◽

Previously Treated

Introduction: AL amyloidosis involves deposition of abnormally folded light chains into a wide range of tissues causing end-organ dysfunction, including in the heart and kidney. Daratumumab, a CD38-targeted antibody, has recently demonstrated efficacy in producing hematologic responses in previously relapsed/refractory disease. However, data on long-term outcomes to daratumumab, including organ responses, are lacking. Here we present the largest retrospective study to date on patients with previously treated AL amyloidosis treated with daratumumab. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis patients treated at Stanford University from January 2016 to January 2019. Patients treated with daratumumab, either as monotherapy with dexamethasone (DMT) or in combination with other plasma-cell directed therapies (DCT) were included. Hematologic and organ responses were assessed by consensus guidelines. Hematologic responses were based on the maximal change in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC). For cardiac response, a >30% and >300 pg/mL decrease in NT-proBNP for patients with initial baseline NT-proBNP ≥650 pg/mL was considered a response. A graded cardiac response metric was also explored with partial response (PR) representing 30-59% reduction, very good partial response (VGPR) ≥60% reduction, and complete response (CR) NT-proBNP <450 pg/mL as previously reported. For renal response, a >30% decrease (by at least 0.5 g/day) in 24-hour urine protein without worsening in creatinine or creatinine clearance by more than 25% in patients with at least 0.5 g/day pretreatment was considered a response. A graded renal response metric was also explored with PR representing 30-59% reduction in proteinuria, VGPR ≥60%, and CR ≤ 200 mg per 24-hour period. Survival data was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. All time-to-event outcomes, including survival and organ responses, were determined from initiation of daratumumab. Results: Eighty-four patients were identified with baseline characteristics at start of daratumumab shown in Table 1. Median duration of follow-up was 16 months. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 83% and median OS was not reached. Median time-to-next-treatment or death was 31 months. Sixty-seven out of 80 evaluable patients (84%) achieved a hematologic response, with 47 patients (59%) achieving a VGPR or better (Figure 1). Sixty-eight patients (81%) had cardiac involvement, and among the 34 evaluable patients, 18 (53%) of evaluable patients achieved a cardiac response with a median response time of 2 months among responders. In terms of a graded cardiac response, 6 patients (18%) were able to achieve cardiac CR, 5 patients (15%) cardiac VGPR, and 7 patients (21%) PR (Figure 2). The median NT-proBNP percent reduction was 64.5% (IQR: 48.3 - 81.1%) and the median absolute reduction was 2395 pg/mL (IQR 1279.5 - 4089.5 pg/mL). Cardiac responses were associated with an improvement in OS (p<0.001, Figure 3), with landmark analysis for cardiac responses at 6-month trending towards statistical significance (100% vs. 51% at 30 months, p=0.052). Fifty-three patients (63%) had renal involvement, and among the 26 evaluable patients, 12 patients (46%) achieved a renal response with a median initial response time of 6 months among responders. Using graded response, 1 patient (4%) achieved renal CR, 7 patients (27%) renal VGPR, 4 patients (15%) renal PR, and 14 patients had no response, worsening creatinine, or were subsequently started on hemodialysis (54%) (Figure 4). The median percent reduction in proteinuria was 74.1% (IQR: 49.2 - 83.1%) and the median absolute reduction in proteinuria was 3.1 g/24 hours (IQR 2.1 - 4.9 g) among responders. There were no significant differences in OS between renal responders and non-responders. Conclusion: Daratumumab is highly effective in the treatment of previously treated AL amyloidosis, and a significant proportion of patients can achieve durable hematologic responses as well as improvements in organ function. Disclosures Kaufman: Janssen: Other: travel/lodging, Research Funding. Liedtke:Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; IQVIA/Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BlueBirdBio: Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Daratumumab in AL amyloidosis

Download Full-text

Melphalan and Dexamethasone Plus Bortezomib Induces Hematologic and Organ Responses in AL-Amyloidosis with Tolerable Neurotoxicity.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.746.746 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 746-746 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jeffrey A Zonder ◽

Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽

Rachel M. Snyder ◽

Jeffrey Matous ◽

Howard Terebelo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dose Adjustment ◽

Response Rate ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Two Stage ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Subsequent Dose ◽

Stage 1

Abstract Abstract 746 Introduction: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is a monoclonal plasma cell disorder associated with progressive organ dysfunction and short survival. Standard therapy for patients (pts) not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is melphalan (Mel; M) + dexamethasone (Dex; D). With non-ASCT therapy, the median overall survival (OS) of high-risk AL pts remains < 1 yr. After the VISTA study showed the addition of bortezomib (Bz) to Mel + Prednisone improved response rate, complete response rate, response duration, and OS in pts with myeloma, we designed this study to determine if adding Bz to MD improves outcomes in AL. Key eligibility criteria: ECOG PS ≤ 3, Cr ≤ 5 mg/dL, T.Bili ≤ 2.5 x IULN, ALT/AST ≤ 3 x IULN, ANC ≥ 1.0 K/mm3, PLT ≥ 80 K/mm3, peripheral neuropathy (PN) ≤ Gr 2 (≤ 1 if painful), no lower limit for LVEF. Study design: Two-stage Phase II study. Stage I: 16 pts with biopsy-proven AL or light chain deposition disease (LCDD). 1° endpoint: complete hematologic responses (cHR). If ≥5 cHRs observed, then 2nd stage with 17 more pts to be opened. The study has a 90% power to detect a true cHR rate of 50%. 2° endpoints include overall HR (cHR + Partial Responses (PR)), organ response (OrR), and OS. Treatment: M (9 mg/m2 PO days 1-4; 6 mg/m2 if Cr > 2.5 mg/dL), Bz (1.3 mg/m2 IV days 1, 8, 15, 22; 1.0 mg/m2 if pt has PN at baseline) and D (40 mg PO/IV days of & days after Bz; 20 mg if ≥ 70 yrs, peripheral edema, or CHF) in 4-6 wk cycles, max of 20 cycles. PN was assessed serially with the FACT/GOG-Ntx survey. Results: To date, 23 pts have been enrolled: 21 with AL; 2 with LCDD. Med age 64 (range: 47-76). Med # prior Rx: 1 (range: 0-2; 7 with ≥1 prior ASCT). Med # organs involved: 4 (range 1-6; 8 pts with ≥ 3). PS 0-1/2-3: 18/1. Response data for the 16 pts comprising stage 1 of this two-stage study are reported here; accrual of all 33 pts is expected to be complete by ASH, and results will be updated. One pt who was not response-evaluable (RE) for HR is included in toxicity data (n=17). Med # cycles MD-Bz: 4+ (range: 2-12+; 9 pts still on treatment). 15 of 16 pts had heme responses: 6 cHRs & 9 PRs. Ten RE pts had OrR (2 cardiac, 3 renal, 6 nerve, 1 lung; total >10 because some pts improved in > 1 organ). Nerve symptom improvement occurred exclusively in pts with cHR. Two pts had progressive disease (PD). Two pts died (4.5 and 9 mos from enrollment, from pneumonia and PD, respectively). Despite baseline dose adjustment for co-morbidities, 12 pts needed subsequent dose-reduction of ≥ 1 of the study meds during therapy (10 Bz, for thrombocytopenia and/or PN in almost all cases). Five pts developed neutropenia (Gr 3-4: 1), 15 pts developed thrombocytopenia (Gr 3-4: 11). Nine pts developed peripheral neuropathy (Gr 3: 2). Other grade 3-4 non-hematologic AEs seen in ≥ 2 pts included edema (5), syncope (3), SVT (2), dehydration (2), fatigue (2), and renal failure (2). One pt developed reversible cardiomyopathy (cycle 8) attributed to Bz. Calculated sensory/dysfunction (S/D) composite scores based on patient responses from the FACT/GOG-Ntx survey improved in 7 of 14 pts between cycles 1 and 4, were stable in 4 pts and worsened in only 3. On average, the S/D score accounted for 43% of each pt's total Ntx score at baseline, whereas it only accounted for 39% of the score after 4 cycles, and 45% after 8 cycles, indicating progressive disability from Bz-related PN was uncommon. As results of nerve conduction studies did not correlate well with reported symptoms or FACT/GOG-Ntx scores in stage 1 of the study, mandatory EMGs were discontinued in stage 2. Conclusions: MD-Bz shows promising activity in the treatment of AL, with 94% of pts in the first stage of this trial achieving HR (38% cHR) and evidence of OrR observed in 63%. Toxicity is manageable, but meds often require baseline or subsequent dose adjustment. A randomized study of MD +/- Bz in AL is planned. Disclosures: Zonder: Cephalon: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speaking CME Only, No PromotionalTalks; Celgene: Speaking CME only; no Promotional Talks. Off Label Use: Bortezomib is being used in the treatment of AL amyloidosis in this trial; it is currently approved for use as treatment of multiple myeloma.. Matous:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau. Janakiraman:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mapara:Resolyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, My Wife: Suzanne Lentzsch, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, My wife: Suzanne Lentzsch, Research Funding; Sentium: Stocks. Gasparetto:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Results of a Phase 2 Study of PD 0332991 in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2940.2940 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2940-2940

Author(s):

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

Luciano J Costa ◽

Nisreen A. Haideri ◽

Georg Hess ◽

Seema Singhal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

D 20 ◽

Ecog Ps

Abstract Abstract 2940 Background: PD 0332991 is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6. Inhibition of CDK4/6 phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) induces prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest (pG1) and synchronous progression to S phase (pG1-S) upon withdrawal, which sensitizes human multiple myeloma (MM) cells to killing by bortezomib (B) or dexamethasone (D) in vitro and in animal models. Based on these observations, a phase 1/2 study in combination with B plus D in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM was initiated. The phase 1 part of the study (completed) determined the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule to be PD 0332991 100 mg QD 12 days on followed by 9 days off treatment in a 21-day cycle with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8 and 11 in pG1 and 15 and 18 in pG1-S (Niesvizky et al. ASH 2010). We present preliminary data from the phase 2 part of the study. Methods: Pts with Rb protein-positive, measurable (as defined by International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG]) progressive, relapsed or refractory MM after ≥1 prior treatment were eligible. Prior B was allowed only if there was a response and disease progression occurred off therapy. Pts received oral PD 0332991 once daily on Days 1–12 in a 21-day cycle in combination with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8, 11, 15, and 18. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, duration of response, and safety. PD 0332991-mediated inhibition of CDK4/6-specific phosphorylation of Rb (pSRb) and Ki67 in bone marrow MM cells were also assessed. The phase 2 part of the study is a Simon Two-Stage Minimax design; 25 response evaluable patients were to be enrolled into the first stage. Results: 39 pts have been tested for Rb and 36 pts (92%) were positive. Of the 36 pts, 30 pts have been enrolled to date including 2 pts who did not receive the study treatment, and 23 pts are considered response evaluable as of the data cut-off. 56% of pts had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1 and 8% had ECOG PS of 2. At baseline, median β2 microglobulin was 3.1 (range 1.6–26.2), median hemoglobin was 11.2 (7.2–13.6), median calcium was 9.4 (8.7–11.9). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–8); 55% had received prior B. Sixteen pts have discontinued (9 due to progressive disease, 3 due to AE, 2 consent withdrawal, and 2 not treated). The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (44%), nausea (20%), anemia, constipation, fatigue, and neutropenia (all 16%); 32% of pts reported grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IHC data showed on-treatment reduction in pSRb and Ki67 in MM cells from bone marrow of 3/3 patients with available samples. To date, 1 pt achieved a complete response (CR), 1 achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial response (PR), 1 minor response (MR), and 5 stable disease (SD); 6 pts are too early for assessment. Conclusions: To date, the combination of PD 0332991 and B plus D has shown response in 4 pts with relapsed/refractory MM. The most commonly reported AEs were cytopenias, consistent with the known safety profiles of PD 0332991 and B. PD 0332991 inhibited phosphorylation of Rb and cell cycle progression in MM cells. The accrual to stage 1 is ongoing. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hess:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spicka:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubczak:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Kim:Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership; Pfizer Oncology: Employment. Randolph:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Chen-Kiang:Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding.

Download Full-text