scholarly journals A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Asciminib, a STAMP Inhibitor, vs Bosutinib in CML After ≥2 Prior TKIs

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Rea ◽  
Michael J Mauro ◽  
Carla Boquimpani ◽  
Yosuke Minami ◽  
Elza Lomaia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
The Difference

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) resistant or intolerant to ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are at high risk of experiencing poor outcomes due to disease biology and inadequate efficacy and/or safety of current therapies. Asciminib is a first-in-class STAMP (Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket) inhibitor with the potential to overcome resistance or intolerance to approved TKIs. In this phase 3, open-label study, patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs were randomized (2:1) to receive asciminib 40 mg twice daily vs bosutinib 500 mg once daily. Randomization was stratified by major cytogenetic response (MCyR) status at baseline. The primary objective was to compare the major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 24 for asciminib vs bosutinib. Two hundred and thirty-three patients were randomized to asciminib (n=157) or bosutinib (n=76). Median follow-up was 14.9 months. The MMR rate at week 24 was 25.5% with asciminib and 13.2% with bosutinib. The difference in MMR rate between treatment arms, after adjusting for MCyR at baseline, was 12.2% (95% CI, 2.19-22.30; 2-sided P=.029). Fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (50.6% vs 60.5%) and fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (5.8% vs 21.1%) occurred with asciminib than with bosutinib. The study showed a superior efficacy of asciminib compared with that of bosutinib, together with a favorable safety profile. These results support the use of asciminib as a new therapy in patients with CML-CP who are resistant or intolerant to ≥2 prior TKIs. The trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03106779.

scholarly journals Meta-Analysis of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events from Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1643
Author(s):  
Prahathishree Mohanavelu ◽  
Mira Mutnick ◽  
Nidhi Mehra ◽  
Brandon White ◽  
Sparsh Kudrimoti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Gastrointestinal Adverse Events

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the frontline therapy for BCR-ABL (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A systematic meta-analysis of 43 peer-reviewed studies with 10,769 CML patients compared the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs) in a large heterogeneous CML population as a function of TKI type. Incidence and severity of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were assessed for imatinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and nilotinib. Examination of combined TKI average GI AE incidence found diarrhea most prevalent (22.5%), followed by nausea (20.6%), and vomiting (12.9%). Other TKI GI AEs included constipation (9.2%), abdominal pain (7.6%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3.5%), and pancreatitis (2.2%). Mean GI AE incidence was significantly different between TKIs (p < 0.001): bosutinib (52.9%), imatinib (24.2%), dasatinib (20.4%), and nilotinib (9.1%). Diarrhea was the most prevalent GI AE with bosutinib (79.2%) and dasatinib (28.1%), whereas nausea was most prevalent with imatinib (33.0%) and nilotinib (13.2%). Incidence of grade 3 or 4 severe GI AEs was ≤3% except severe diarrhea with bosutinib (9.5%). Unsupervised clustering revealed treatment efficacy measured by the complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response, and overall survival is driven most by disease severity, not TKI type. For patients with chronic phase CML without resistance, optimal TKI selection should consider TKI AE profile, comorbidities, and lifestyle.

scholarly journals Nilotinib therapy in an imatinib intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia patient with pulmonary severe hypertension

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2S) ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Mario Annunziata
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patient ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Cutaneous Rash

Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has significant efficacy in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. In general, hematologic and extrahematologic side effects of imatinib therapy are mild to moderate, with the large majority of patients tolerating prolonged periods of therapy. However, a minority of patients are completely intolerant of therapy, while others are able to remain on therapy despite significant side effects. Here, we describe a chronic phase CML patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension, mechanical hearth valve, who experienced extrahematologic adverse event (persistent grade III cutaneous rash, despite two discontinuations of imatinib and using of steroid). Necessitating switch to one of new tyrosine kinase inhibitors, nilotinib, has resulted in complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response, after 3 and 6 months, respectively. No cross-intolerance with imatinib was observed during nilotinib therapy. Besides, this clinical case suggests that warfarin and nilotinib can be used concurrently without the risk of increased anticoagulant effect.

scholarly journals Nilotinib is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 1141-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Francis J. Giles ◽  
Kapil N. Bhalla ◽  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Abl Tyrosine Kinase

Abstract Nilotinib is a potent selective inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase approved for use in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), and in CML-CP and CML-accelerated phase after imatinib failure. Nilotinib (400 mg twice daily) was approved on the basis of the initial results of this phase 2 open-label study. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving major cytogenetic response (CyR). All patients were followed for ≥ 24 months or discontinued early. Of 321 patients, 124 (39%) continue on nilotinib treatment. Overall, 59% of patients achieved major CyR; this was complete CyR (CCyR) in 44%. Of patients achieving CCyR, 56% achieved major molecular response. CyRs were durable, with 84% of patients who achieved CCyR maintaining response at 24 months. The overall survival at 24 months was 87%. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate, generally transient, and easily managed. This study indicates that nilotinib is effective, with a manageable safety profile, and can provide favorable long-term benefits for patients with CML-CP after imatinib failure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00109707.

IRIS 6-Year Follow-Up: Sustained Survival and Declining Annual Rate of Transformation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Treated with Imatinib.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 25-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Brian J. Druker ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Stephen G. O’Brien ◽  
Insa Gathmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
Annual Rate ◽  
Interferon Α

Abstract Background: The International Randomized study of Interferon versus STI571 (IRIS) study demonstrated that imatinib has superior safety and efficacy relative to interferon-α plus cytarabine (IFN+ara-C). Patients on the imatinib arm achieved an estimated 5-year OS of 89%. To monitor the long-term responses achieved by patients on imatinib, the 6-year follow-up of the IRIS patient population is summarized. Methods: 1106 patients were randomly assigned to either imatinib or IFN+ara-C and evaluated for hematologic and cytogenetic responses, event-free survival, progression to accelerated-phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC), overall survival (OS), and frequency of adverse events and discontinuations. Results: The downward trend in the risk of disease progression on imatinib has continued with a 0.4% event rate (including loss of response) and a 0% rate of transformation to AP/BC attained between years 5 and 6. Of 553 who were randomized to imatinib, 364 (65.8%) remain on study drug at 6 years: 14 (2.5%) crossed over to the IFN arm, and 175 (31.6%) pts have discontinued from imatinib study therapy for any reason. The following reasons were cited for discontinuation from the IRIS study: adverse events, 23 patients (4.2%); unsatisfactory therapeutic effect, 66 patients (11.9%); protocol violation, 15 patients (2.7%); withdrawal of consent, 32 patients (5.8%); administrative problems, 6 patients (1.1%); and 16 patients (2.9%) elected to undergo a stem cell transplantation (SCT). Death was the reason for discontinuation for 10 (1.8%) patients, and 7 patients (1.3%) were lost to follow-up. The best observed complete hematologic response rate among patients receiving first-line imatinib was 97%. The best observed major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates were 89% and 83%, respectively, with 2 additional CCyR observed since the prior 5-year analysis. At the current 6-year follow-up, 325 patients are still in CCyR, another 24 had lost CCyR but regained it, 6 patients lost CCyR but remain in MCyR, and the remaining 9 patients never had a documented CCyR. Overall, an estimated 83% of patients were event-free, and 93% were free of progression to AP or BC at 6 years on imatinib study treatment, as patients were followed only for OS after discontinuation. After the second year on imatinib, the annual rate of events decreased every year, as did the annual relapse rate. Based on the current follow-up, a total of 66 (12%) patients have died (19 after SCT, 27 not due to CML). Estimated 6-year OS rate for all patients who received imatinib as initial therapy was 88%. When survival is censored at time of SCT for patients who proceeded to transplant, the estimated OS at 6 years is 91%. In an analysis of serious adverse events, no new safety issues were identified between the 5-year report and this analysis. Conclusions: The 6-year follow-up analysis of the IRIS population indicates that continuous treatment of chronic-phase CML with imatinib induces durable responses in a high percentage of patients with a decreasing rate of relapse and a favorable long-term safety profile.

Dasatinib 50 mg or 70 mg BID compared to 100 mg or 140 mg QD in patients with CML in chronic phase (CP) who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib: One-year results of CA180034

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7004-7004 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. P. Shah ◽  
D. W. Kim ◽  
H. M. Kantarjian ◽  
P. Rousselot ◽  
P. E. Dorlhiac-Llacer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
One Year

7004 Background: Previous data with dasatinib (SPRYCEL®), a short-acting oral multitargeted kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL and SRC family kinases, have shown the safety and efficacy of the 70 mg BID dose in CP-CML patients. Surprisingly, phase-I data (NEJM 2006;354:2531) demonstrated complete hematologic (CHR) and major cytogenetic responses (MCyR) among CP-CML patients at total daily doses (TDD) of 100 mg and 140 mg in both the BID and QD schedule, despite the achievement of only transient inhibition of BCR-ABL by dasatinib when administered once daily. Methods: Patients with CP-CML resistant or intolerant to imatinib were randomized to one of 4 dasatinib arms: 1) 100 mg QD; 2) 50 mg BID; 3) 140 mg QD; 4) 70 mg BID. In this randomized, prospective, open-label trial, the primary objective compared the CyR rate among the BID and QD arms. Secondary objectives included comparison of the CyR rate between TTDs of 100 and 140 mg and the safety among the 4 arms. Results: 662 patients were randomized from July 2005 to March 2006 and received treatment. Response rates, with a median duration of treatment of 8 months, are shown below. Duration of CyR and progression-free survival were similar across all 4 arms. There was significantly less grade (Gr) 3–4 neutropenia (P=0.035), thrombocytopenia (P=0.001), anemia (P=0.032), and pleural effusions (P=0.028) in the 100-mg QD arm compared to the other 3 arms combined. No differences were seen across the 4 arms in the rates of other adverse events. There were fewer interruptions and reductions and the least number of patients discontinuing treatment for drug-related toxicity in the 100-mg QD arm. Conclusions: Dasatinib 100 mg QD offers the most favorable benefit-risk ratio in CP-CML. This trial provides the first evidence that intermittent kinase inhibition can achieve deep clinical remissions and is associated with an improved safety profile. One-year follow-up on all subjects, molecular response rates, and BCR-ABL mutation data will be presented. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Correlations between Mutations in Cancer-Related Genes, Therapy Responses and Outcomes of the 3 rd Generation Tyrosine Kinase-Inhibitor (TKI) in Persons with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Failing Prior TKI-Therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 308-308
Author(s):  
Xiaoshuai Zhang ◽  
Zongru Li ◽  
Yazhen Qin ◽  
Robert Peter Gale ◽  
Xiaojun Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Molecular Response

Abstract Background Most, but not everyone with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) responds to imatinib or 2 nd-generation tyrosine kinase-inhibitors (TKIs). Mutations in cancer-related genes and in other than ABL1 may explain variable responses and outcomes to the 3 rd-generation TKIs including ponatinib and olverembatinib. Aim Interrogate correlations between mutations in cancer-related genes and therapy responses and outcomes to 3 rd-generation TKIs. Methods We used deep targeted sequencing for cancer-related mutations and Sanger sequencing for BCR::ABL1 on DNA samples from 167 subjects with CML failing to the prior imatinib and/or 2 nd-generation TKI-therapy and just before receiving a 3 rd-generation TKI. Gene ontology (GO) analysis was used to evaluate functional enrichment in GO terms among mutated genes. Optimal cut-offs for variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of the common mutations were determined by analyzing receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves. A Cox multi-variable regression model was used to identify correlations between mutations in cancer-related genes and therapy responses and outcomes of 3 rd-generation TKI-therapy. Results 167 subjects in chronic phase (n = 125) and accelerated phase (n = 42) received ponatinib (n = 28) or olverembatinib (n = 139) therapy. 27 subjects were exposed to imatinib; 79, a 2 nd-generation TKI; 61, imatinib and a 2 nd generation TKI. 142 (85%) subjects had ABL1 mutations including ABL1T315I (n = 116) or others (n = 26). 163 subjects had other cancer-related mutations which were evaluated in epigenetic regulators (n = 150), transcription factors (n = 84), cell signaling (n = 42), tumor suppressors (n = 39), protein kinases (n = 27), chromatin modification (n = 9) and DNA damage repair (n = 3) related-genes according to functional enrichment. The top 10 mutations were ASXL1 (n = 115), RUNX1 (n = 12), KMT2D (n = 12), PHF6 (n = 8), KMT2C (n = 8), IKZF1 (n = 8), STAT5A (n = 8), DNMT3A (n = 7), TET2 (n = 6) and BCOR (n = 6). 20 subjects had high-risk additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs). Frequency of BCR::ABL1 mutations was inversely- (p &lt; 0.001) and of cancer-related mutations directly-related (p = 0.009) to increasing exposure to prior TKI therapies. These relationships were especially so for mutations in KMT2C (p = 0.06), DNMT3A (p = 0.09), KDM6A (p = 0.06) and TNFAIP3 (p = 0.08). BCR::ABL1 (82% vs. 95%, p = 0.03), RUNX1 (5% vs. 14%, p = 0.04), KMT2C (3% vs. 10%, p = 0.08) and IKZF1 (3% vs. 10%, p = 0.10) were more common in accelerated phase. With a median follow-up of 34 months (interquartile range [IQR], 12-40 months), 95 and 71 subjects achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR). 18 subjects transformed to accelerated (n = 8) or blast (n = 10) phases, 16 died of disease progression (n = 12) or other causes (n = 4). 3-year cumulative incidences of CCyR and MMRwere 65% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 58, 71%) and 52% (43, 61%). 3-year probabilities of progression-free survival (PFS) and survival were 88% (81, 92%) and 91% (85, 95%). Mutations in tumor suppressor genes were more common in subjects not achieving a CCyR (27% vs. 19%, p = 0.01). In multi-variable analyses ASXL1 mutation with a VAF ≥ 17% and a PHF6 mutation were significantly associated with lower cumulative incidences of CCyR (p &lt; 0.001 and p = 0.032) and MMR (p &lt; 0.001 and p = 0.04). Moreover, subjects with BCR-ABL1T315I mutation had significantly higher cumulative incidences of CCyR (p = 0.07) and MMR (p = 0.04) than those with no BCR-ABL1 mutation and other BCR-ABL1 non-T315I mutation. Increasing age, more Ph 1-chromosome-positive cells, the best prior therapy-response &lt; partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) and more TKI-therapies were associated with poor responses. STAT5A mutation was significantly associated with worse PFS (p = 0.002) and survival (p &lt; 0.001), RUNX1 mutation (p = 0.006), high-risk ACAs (p = 0.07) and accelerated phase (p = 0.002) with worse PFS and increasing age (p = 0.05) and comorbidity(ies) (p = 0.05) with wosre survival. Conclusions ASXL1 mutations with a VAF ≥ 17% and PHF6 mutations were associated with poor responses of the 3 rd-generation TKI-therapy. STAT5A and RUNX1 mutations and high-risk ACAs were also associated with worse outcomes in persons receiving a 3 rd-generation TKI. These data should help physicians select people to receive 3 rd-generation TKIs. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with P190BCR-ABL: analysis of characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic significance

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (11) ◽  
pp. 2232-2235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dushyant Verma ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Dan Jones ◽  
Rajyalakshmi Luthra ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Blast Phase ◽  
Complete Hematologic Response ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract The most common BCR-ABL transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are e13a2(b2a2) and e14a2(b3a2). Other transcripts such as e1a2 are rare and their outcome with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) therapy is undefined. We analyzed 1292 CML patients and identified 14 with only e1a2 transcripts, 9 in chronic phase (CP), 1 in accelerated phase (AP), and 4 in blast phase (BP). Of the CP, 4 achieved complete hematologic response (CHR); 2, complete cytogenetic response (CCyR); 2, partial cytogenetic response (PCyR), and 1 did not respond to imatinib. Five patients progressed to myeloid BP (3), lymphoid BP (1), or AP (1). The AP patient received various TKIs sequentially and achieved only CHR. BP patients received hyper-CVAD (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone) plus imatinib/dasatinib or idarubicin plus cytarabine (Ara-C); 2 did not respond, 1 had CCyR, and 1 short-lasting complete molecular response (CMR). Overall, cytogenetic responses lasted 3 to 18 months; only 2 achieved major molecular response (MMR) on TKI. P190BCR-ABL CML is rare and is associated with an inferior outcome to therapy with TKI. These patients need to be identified as high-risk patients.

Switching patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) with residual disease on long-term imatinib (IM) to nilotinib (NIL): ENESTcmr 24-mo follow-up.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7053-7053
Author(s):  
Nelson Spector ◽  
Brian Leber ◽  
Jeffrey Howard Lipton ◽  
Carmino De Souza ◽  
Beatriz Moiraghi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Disease ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Treatment Free Remission

7053^ Background: The 12-mo results of ENESTcmr demonstrated that switching pts on IM with sustained BCR-ABL positivity to NIL leads to faster, deeper molecular responses (MRs)vs remaining on IM. These deeper molecular responses (MR4.5 [BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032%IS] or greater) are a prerequisite to enter most treatment-free remission studies. Here, we report 24-mo f/u of ENESTcmr. Methods: Philadelphia chromosome–positive CML-CP pts (N = 207) who achieved a complete cytogenetic response, but had detectable BCR-ABL transcripts after ≥ 2 y on IM, were randomized to receive NIL 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or continue their IM dose (400/600 mg once daily [QD]; n = 103). Results: By 24 mo, significantly more pts achieved confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL (by RQ-PCR with ≥ 4.5 log sensitivity in 2 consecutive samples) with a switch to NIL vs continuing IM (22.1% vs 8.7%; P = .0087). The increase in the rate of undetectable BCR-ABL from mo 12 to 24 was higher for pts on NIL vs IM (9.6 vs 2.9 percentage points). In pts without MR4.5 at baseline (BL), MR4.5 was achieved by 24 mo in 42.9% vs 20.8% of pts (NIL vs IM; P = .0006). In pts without major molecular response (MMR; ≤ 0.1%IS) at BL, MR4.5 was achieved by 24 mo in 29.2% vs 3.6% of pts (P = .016). No progressions to accelerated phase/blast crisis or deaths occurred on study since the 12-mo f/u. Event-free survival at 24 mo was 96.6% vs 92.8% in the NIL and IM arms, respectively. Discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 11.5% and 2.9% of pts in the NIL and IM arms. The NIL safety profile was consistent with prior switch studies. Conclusions: By 24 mo, significantly more pts achieved deeper responses (MR4.5and undetectable BCR-ABL) with switch to NIL vs remaining on IM, and the difference between arms in these endpoints increased between 12 and 24 mo. Clinical trial information: NCT00760877. [Table: see text]

Significant Reduction of BCR-ABL Transcripts after Switching to Imatinib Therapy in Patients with CML and Complete or Near-Complete Cytogenetic Responses to Interferon-Alpha (IFN).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2142-2142
Author(s):  
Susan Branford ◽  
Timothy Hughes ◽  
Steven Stylian ◽  
Anthony P. Schwarer ◽  
Chris Arthur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Advanced Phase ◽  
Molecular Assessment

Abstract IFN confers a survival advantage for the minority of patients with CML who achieve a complete cytogenetic response. The 10-year survival rate was reported as 72%. In the IRIS trial only 3% of patients remained on IFN after randomization and 65% crossed-over to imatinib. Imatinib offered superior compliance and toxicity profiles and clear quality of life advantages. Furthermore, patients on first line imatinib with a major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months had a 100% progression free survival to advanced phase. An important clinical question of whether IFN-responsive patients can experience further improvements with imatinib has not been answered. We studied 23 chronic phase patients treated with IFN for a median of 4.5 years (r1.6–14.3) who had achieved a complete (n=15) or near-complete (n=8) cytogenetic response. IFN was ceased and 400mg imatinib commenced in a clinical trial with the primary objective of determining if switching to imatinib in IFN-responsive patients improves response when assessed at the molecular level. Molecular assessment was undertaken for the first 12 months of imatinib therapy by measurement of peripheral blood BCR-ABL levels by quantitative PCR at 3 month intervals. A subset of 10 patients had follow-up molecular assessment for 3.8 to 4.5 years after commencing imatinib. Prior to IFN cessation all patients had detectable BCR-ABL and 16 of 23 had not achieved a MMR, which is a 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL from a standardized baseline value for untreated patients. At a median of 3 months of imatinib (r3–12) these 16 patients achieved MMR. A significant reduction of BCR-ABL over the 12 month assessment was considered >50% and this occurred in 15 of these 16 patients (median 98.4% reduction, r94.4–99.8). In the sole patient without a significant reduction, BCR-ABL returned to the pre imatinib level after repeated dose interruptions of 93 days and decrease to 200mg imatinib due to thrombocytopenia. Of the 7 patients with a MMR prior to IFN cessation, all 7 maintained this level of response after switching to imatinib. Therefore, over the 12 month assessment all patients either achieved MMR (n=16) or maintained MMR (n=7). One patient withdrew consent after 83 days. The 10 patients with longer molecular follow-up of up to 4.5 years of imatinib all maintained MMR. The typical molecular response is illustrated in the figure, which plots the log reduction of BCR-ABL from the standardized baseline for 3 patients assessed at regular time-points before and after switching to imatinib. In conclusion, the data suggest that switching to imatinib leads to rapid and significant improvement in IFN-responsive patients in terms of achieving MMR, a response with established prognostic value with imatinib therapy. The study should help patients and their physicians make evidence-based decisions about the potential benefits and risks of switching to imatinib with prior response to IFN. Figure Figure

A Phase 3 Pilot Study of Continuous Imatinib Versus Pulsed Imatinib with or without G-CSF in Patients with Chronic Phase CML Who Have Achieved a Complete Cytogenetic Response to Imatinib.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1033-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Heaney ◽  
Mark Drummond ◽  
Jaspal Kaeda ◽  
Franck Nicolini ◽  
Richard Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ifn Therapy

Abstract Imatinib mesylate (IM) induces complete cytogenetic responses (CCR) in the majority of patients with CML in chronic phase (CP). Despite this reduction in disease burden many patients continue to have detectable Bcr-Abl transcripts in peripheral blood. We believe that IM-resistant Ph+ haemopoietic stem cells (HSC) contribute to this residual disease. IM has been shown to selectively target proliferating CML HSC, while simultaneously exerting an antiproliferative effect on the quiescent population-causing accumulation. We have previously characterised these quiescent cells and shown that intermittent in-vitro exposure of Ph+HSC to exogenous G-CSF leads to a reduction in number of quiescent and total HSC in culture (Clin Can Res 2006, 12: 626). This randomised, multi-centre, pilot phase 3 study was established to determine the safety and efficacy of combining G-CSF with IM in patients with CP CML who had achieved CCR on IM. 45 patients were equally randomised between 3 arms: continuous IM (cIM); pulsed IM (pIM 3 weeks IM and 1 week no drug); and pIM-G-CSF (pIM-G 3 weeks IM and 1 week G-CSF). The dose of IM administered was the dose on which the patient had achieved CCR. Patients had a median age of 59y (25–76y) and had been diagnosed with CML for a median of 36m (8–171m). 21 patients had prior IFN therapy with 4 autografted. Hasford scores were 36% low, 46% Intermediate, and 18% high. At baseline 25 patients had a major molecular response (MMR cIM 7, pIM 8, pIM-G 10). Patients were assessed monthly for 1 year with clinical examination, routine blood tests and Bcr-Abl Q-RT-PCR. Significant cardiovascular events were seen in 2 patients - 1 patient died of myocardial infarction (pIM-G) and 1 survived a stroke (cIM). There was a trend to less IM-associated side effects (diarrhoea, muscle cramps) in the experimental arms, though bony pain was reported in pIM-G (5 patients). Statistical analysis (ANCOVA) was performed on Bcr-Abl readings taken during the trial and no significant difference was detectable between the 3 arms. Further endpoint analyses showed that 4 achieved MMR (4 cIM) 21 maintained MMR (6 cIM, 6 pIM, 9 pIM-G) and 7 showed disease progression with loss of MMR (1 cIM, 2 pIM, 1 pIM-G) and/or loss of CCR (2 pIM, 1 pIM-G). 4 patients were withdrawn as a result of disease progression (3 pIM, 1 pIM-G). In conclusion both experimental arms appeared safe and well tolerated. In this pilot study there was no clear difference in efficacy when either pIM or pIM-G was compared to cIM, despite the 25% effective dose reduction of IM in the experimental arms. The absence of a clear benefit means that this approach cannot be recommended as an alternative to standard IM dosing, however may be applicable to a selected group of patients who cannot tolerate standard daily dosing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document