Prediction of Response to Imatinib by Prospective Quantitation of BCR-ABL Transcript in Late Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia PatientsBy GIMEMA Working Party on CML.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4672-4672
Author(s):  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Fabrizio Pane ◽  
Marilina Amabile ◽  
Simona Bassi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prediction Of Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Blood Samples

Abstract Imatinib mesylate (STI571), a specific Bcr-Abl inhibitor, has shown a potent antileukemic activity in clinical studies of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Early prediction of response to imatinib cannot be anticipated. We used a standardized quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) for bcr-abl transcripts on 191 out of 200 late-chronic phase CML patients enrolled in a phase II clinical trial with imatinib 400 mg/day. Bone marrow samples were collected before treatment, after 3, 6 and 12 months or at the end of study treatment (12 months) while peripheral blood samples were obtained after 2, 3, 6, 10, 14, 20 and 52 weeks of therapy. The amount of Bcr-Abl transcript was expressed as the ratio of Bcr-Abl to β2-microglobulin (β2M). We show that, following initiation of imatinib, the early Bcr-Abl level trends in both bone marrow and peripheral blood samples made it possible to predict the subsequent cytogenetic outcome after 6 and 12 months of treatment, and that these early trends were also predictive of progression-free survival.

Improved disease-free–survival after transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells as compared with bone marrow from HLA-identical unrelated donors in patients with first chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 1130-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet H. Elmaagacli ◽  
Semiha Basoglu ◽  
Rudolf Peceny ◽  
Rudolf Trenschel ◽  
Hellmut Ottinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Outcomes after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 37) were compared with outcomes after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) (n = 54) in the HLA-compatible unrelated donor setting. Median follow-up was 17 months after PBSCT and 29 months after BMT. Both neutrophil and platelet recovery were faster after PBSCT (P < .05). PBSCT was associated with improved immune reconstitution, with higher peripheral blood naive (CD4+CD45RA+) and memory (CD4+ CD45RO+) helper T cells at 3 months and 12 months after transplantation (P < .03). The cumulative incidence of acute (grades II-IV) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were similar, but BMT was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of severe, acute (grade III-IV) GVHD at 24% as compared with 8% with PBSCT (P < .05). Molecular relapse, defined by 2 consecutive positive polymerase chain reaction assays for bcr-abl within a 4-week interval, occurred in 12 of 45 evaluable patients (27%) after BMT and in 4 of 37 (11%) after PBSCT (not significant). Cytogenetic relapse occurred in 5 of 54 patients after BMT (9%) and in 1 of the 37 (3%) patients after PBSCT (not significant). Seventeen of the 54 patients died after BMT (31%), as compared with 2 of 37 patients after PBSCT (5%). Deaths in the BMT group were associated mainly with infections and severe, acute GVHD. The estimated probability of transplant-related mortality (TRM) and disease-free survival at 1000 days after receiving the transplant were 30% and 64% in the BMT group and 5% and 91% in the PBSCT group (P < .03). Overall survival 1000 days after receiving the transplant was 66% after BMT and 94% after PBSCT (P < .02). In the multivariate analysis, only acute GVHD significantly influenced TRM (P < .01).

Real-Life Management of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: The Italian Experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiorina Giona ◽  
Michelina Santopietro ◽  
Giuseppe Menna ◽  
Maria Caterina Putti ◽  
Concetta Micalizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Optimal Management ◽  
Molecular Monitoring ◽  
Italian Experience ◽  
Adults And Children

Background: To date, no data on the adherence to specific guidelines for children with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) have been reported. Methods: Since 2001, guidelines for treatment with imatinib mesylate (IM) and monitoring in patients younger than 18 years with CP-CML have been shared with 9 pediatric referral centers (P centers) and 4 reference centers for adults and children/adolescents (AP centers) in Italy. In this study, the adherence to these guidelines was analyzed. Results: Thirty-four patients with a median age of 11.4 years and 23 patients with a median age of 11.0 years were managed at 9 P and at 4 AP centers, respectively. Evaluations of bone marrow (BM) and/or peripheral blood (PB) were available for more than 90% of evaluable patients. Cytogenetics and molecular monitoring of PB were more consistently performed in AP centers, whereas molecular analysis of BM was carried out more frequently in P centers. Before 2009, some patients who responded to IM underwent a transplantation, contrary to the guidelines’ recommendations. Conclusions: Our experience shows that having specific guidelines is an important tool for an optimal management of childhood CP-CML, together with exchange of knowledge and proactive discussions within the network.

Consistency Of RQ-PCR Analysis Results In Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow Samples In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Relevance From The Practical and Logistic Point Of View

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2592-2592
Author(s):  
Giovanna Rege-Cambrin ◽  
Carmen Fava ◽  
Enrico Gottardi ◽  
Filomena Daraio ◽  
Emilia Giugliano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Consensus has been achieved that standardized molecular quantitative analysis (RQ-PCR) on peripheral blood (PB) is a suitable method for monitoring residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, BM is still obtained at specific timepoints, and in a number of cases, only bone marrow (BM) sample collected for cytogenetic analysis is available. Being one of the laboratory involved in the standardization process of molecular monitoring for CML patients, we decided to perform a comparative analysis of BM and PB samples in order to evaluate the consistency of the results. Methods Between March 2009 and January 2013, 230 consecutive RQ-PCR tests to assess BCR-ABL transcript levels from simultaneously collected PB and BM samples were performed (for a total of 460 analysis) on 77 patients affected by Ph+ CML in chronic phase treated in our center. All samples were analyzed in the same laboratory following international guidelines (Cross N, Leukemia 2012) and results were expressed according to the International Scale; ABL1 was used as control gene. Time from blood-drawn to processing was within 3-4 hours. Results Among the 230 pairs, 3 were considered as not evaluable because of inadequate material; for the purpose of this study, the remaining 227 pairs were considered as “evaluable”. 204 pairs were classified as “fit” when both BM and PB ABL amplification resulted in more than 10.000 copies; 23 pairs were considered unfit for ABL1 <10.000 in either one of the two samples (21) or both (2). The mean number of ABL1 copies in all evaluable samples was 35.639 for BM (SD 21.465) and 30.958 for PB samples (SD 18.696). Correlation analysis was performed on the whole population and in 4 subgroups: No Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR, 22%), CCyR without Major Molecular Response (MMR), (21.6%), CCyR with MMR (excluding patients with MR4 or better,19.8%), and CCyR with MR4 – MR4.5 (32,6%). Cytogenetic response was not available in 9 BM samples (4%), not included in the subgroup analysis. Spearman correlation of BCR/ABL ratio values between PB versus BM paired samples resulted in a statistically significant correlation in all groups, both for evaluable and fit pairs. Correlation was stronger in samples that were not in MMR or better (table 1 and figure 1). The Wilcoxon test showed that the mean difference of BCR/ABL values between paired PB and BM samples was not significantly different from zero (in evaluable and fit pairs by considering the whole population). Concordance was further analyzed by the K test which resulted in a coefficient equal to 0.627, corresponding to a notable degree of concordance. For patients in CCyR, agreement on classification of response (MMR, MR4, MR4.5) between paired PB and BM samples was observed in 125/168 evaluable pairs; 22 out of the 43 evaluable cases of disagreement were due to technical failures (in 10 BM and 12 PB samples). In 14 of the remaining 21 cases, PB was more sensitive. Conclusions In a single center experience of molecular analysis, BCR/ABL ratio was highly consistent in BM and PB samples. In less than 10% of the cases a single test did not reach the required sensitivity of 10.000 ABL copies and the double testing allowed to obtain a valid result. This may be especially valuable in evaluating an early response (i.e. at 3 months), when the amount of disease has prognostic relevance. The analysis will be expanded to include samples coming from different centers to evaluate a possible role of timing and transport on data consistency. Disclosures: Saglio: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Significant Discrepancy In Peripheral Blood Compared to Bone Marrow BCR-ABL Transcript Levels In Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4471-4471
Author(s):  
Jason N Berman ◽  
Wenda Greer ◽  
Ridas Juskevicius ◽  
Conrad V Fernandez ◽  
Mark Bernstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Transcript Level ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 4471 Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is associated with the reciprocal t(9;22)(q34;q11) translocation, which generates the BCR-ABL fusion oncogene and is the most common myeloproliferative disease affecting adults. The clinical outcome in this disease has been revolutionized with the use of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec), a targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and molecular surveillance, with the development of quantitative PCR (qPCR) approaches to measure BCR-ABL transcript levels. A number of guidelines outlining follow-up strategies for patients with chronic phase CML on imatinib therapy have been established. Once a patient is stable, a typical recommendation includes peripheral blood (PB) monitoring by qPCR of BCR-ABL levels every 3–6 months to determine response or relapse, with consideration of annual bone marrow (BM) examinations to assess for cytogenetic evolution. At the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and IWK Health Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia, 34 patients with chronic phase CML on imatinib were identified from 2006 to 2008, with 36 paired samples, where transcript levels were assessed in both PB and BM within one week of each other. In 24 of the cases, the BCR-ABL transcript levels in PB and BM were within 0.5 log values of each other. In the remaining 12 cases, BCR-ABL transcript levels differed by greater than 0.5 log. Three cases had higher BM levels, but surprisingly, 9 patients had a higher BCR-ABL transcript level in the PB. In all cases, BCR-ABL levels were assessed by Q-RT-PCR using the ABI7500 instrument and primers and probe designed to detect p210 and p190 breakpoints. Results were recorded as a ratio of %BCR-ABL to GAPDH that was amplified as an internal control. There was no significant difference in clinical, morphological or laboratory parameters between these patients and others who had comparable PB and BM BCR-ABL levels. These findings highlight the need to compare BCR-ABL transcript levels derived from the same tissue during longitudinal monitoring. Moreover, while potentially due to stochastic factors, the striking observation of higher PB BCR-ABL transcript levels raises the question of which tissue represents the most accurate source for monitoring of BCR-ABL transcript levels and whether there is value in confirming a significant change in PB transcript level with BM evaluation. The discrepant levels in PB and BM could not be attributed to technical issues; the timing of sample processing from collection and quality of mRNA were comparable and no variability was observed in GAPDH levels to account for the difference. Without a technical explanation, the mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains uncertain. We speculate that it may reflect CML stem cell geography with one possibility being that the CML niche may be located external to the BM. Further studies are needed to confirm these observations. If corroborated, then revision of surveillance approaches for chronic phase patients may be indicated. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals An Atypical Initial Presentation of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with Central Nervous System and Lymph Node Blast Crises

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khadega A. Abuelgasim ◽  
Saeed Alshieban ◽  
Nada A. Almubayi ◽  
Ayman Alhejazi ◽  
Abdulrahman R. Jazieh
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Molecular Response

We describe the case of a young man with therapy-naive chronic myeloid leukemia who did not initially have any peripheral blood or bone marrow excess blasts but presented with extramedullary myeloid blast crises involving the central nervous system and multiple lymph nodes. Conventional cytogenetic tests were positive for t(9;22)(q34:q11) as well as for trisomy 8, 14 and 21 and del(16q). The patient’s peripheral blood and bone marrow were positive for the BCR-ABL oncogene when analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. He achieved good clinical, radiological, cytogenetic and molecular response to acute myeloid leukemia induction chemotherapy combined with 16 doses of triple intrathecal chemotherapy and oral dasatinib (second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor) treatment. Due to his poor general condition, he was treated with 24 Gy of whole-brain radiation therapy, as allogeneic stem cell transplantation was not feasible. Although extramedullary CNS blast crises are usually associated with a very poor outcome, our patient remains in complete cytogenetic and molecular remission, on single-agent dasatinib, 4 years after the diagnosis with no current evidence of active extramedullary disease. This suggests that dasatinib has a role in controlling not only chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia, but also its CNS blast crisis.

Frontline imatinib treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: no impact of age on outcome, a survey by the GIMEMA CML Working Party

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (21) ◽  
pp. 5591-5599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Francesca Palandri ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Tamara Intermesoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival

AbstractThe median age of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients is ∼ 60 years, and age is still considered an important prognostic factor, included in Sokal and EURO risk scores. However, few data are available about the long-term outcome of older patients treated with imatinib (IM) frontline. We analyzed the relationship between age and outcome in 559 early chronic-phase CML patients enrolled in 3 prospective clinical trials of Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto CML Working Party, treated frontline with IM, with a median follow-up of 60 months. There were 115 older patients (≥ 65 years; 21%). The complete cytogenetic and major molecular response rates were similar in the 2 age groups. In older patients, event-free survival (55% vs 67%), failure-free survival (78% vs 92%), progression-free survival (62% vs 78%), and overall survival (75% vs 89%) were significantly inferior (all P < .01) because of a higher proportion of deaths that occurred in complete hematologic response, therefore unrelated to CML progression (15% vs 3%, P < .0001). The outcome was similar once those deaths were censored. These data show that response to IM was not affected by age and that the mortality rate linked to CML is similar in both age groups. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00514488 and #NCT00510926.

Restrospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Dasatinib and Nilotinib in Patients with Imatinib-Resistant or –intolerant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: Korean CML Working Party

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1691-1691
Author(s):  
Jeong-Ok Lee ◽  
Inho Kim ◽  
Joo-Seop Chung ◽  
Yeo-Kyeoung Kim ◽  
Ho-Young Yhim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Abstract 1691 Dasatinib and nilotinib have been founded to be effective and well-tolerated in patients who develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib. Not enough data are currently available to recommend one over the other as the preferred second-line therapy based on efficacy data. Therefore we planned a multicenter retrospective study to analyze the efficacy and safety of dasatinib and nilotinib in patients with imatinib-resistant or –intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. In this Korean multicenter study, 126 patients imatinib-resistant or –intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase were treated with dasatinib (n=76) or nilotinib (n=50) The purpose of this study was to compare rates of cytogenetic and molecular response rate, event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and toxicities of nilotinib and dasatinib treatment of imatinib-resistant or –intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. PFS was defined as the time from the start of treatment to the earliest date of any of following event: loss of complete hematologic response (CHR), loss of major cytogenetic response (MCyR), progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blastic phase (BP), discontinuation due to treatment failure as assessed by the clinician, and death from any cause on therapy. Event was defined by any one of the following: loss of CHR, loss of MCyR, progression to AP or BP, discontinuation due to treatment failure as assessed by the clinician, treatment discontinuation due to toxicity, and death from any cause on therapy. For dasatinib and nilotinib group, median ages (51 years old vs. 53), median durations of CML (23.7 months vs. 19.8 ) before receiving dasatinib or nilotinib and duration of prior imatinib treatment (21.7 months vs 17.7) were comparable. Nilotinib group had a higher proportion of intermediate and high sokal scores at the time of diagnosis than dasatinib group (41.5 vs 29.3% (high), 41.5% vs 32.5%(intermediate), 17.1% vs 37.9(low), p= 0.04). After median follow-up durations of 20.2 months of dasatinib group and 25.3 months of nilotinib group, the rates of major molecular response were 50.0% for dasatinib group and 59.6% for nilotinib group (p=NS) and the rates of MCyR (complete and partial cytogenetic response) were 78.4% for dasatinib group and 74.5% for nilotinib group (p=NS). The estimated EFS at 24 months was 67% and 48% in dasatinib and nilotinib group, respectively. (p<0.05). The estimated PFS at 24 months was 85% and 56% in dasatinib and nilotinib group, respectively. (p<0.05) Overall survival rates were comparable in both treatment groups (24-months OS; dasatinib 91%, nilotinib 94%; p=0.65). Both were generally well tolerated. Hematologic toxicities were more frequent among patients receiving dasatinib. 10 patients (13%) had pleural effusion in dasatinib; 9 events were grade 1 or 2. Elevated liver enzyme were more frequent among patients receiving dasatinib. In conclusion, In this study population, nilotinib and dasatinib showed similar cytogenetic and molecular response rates and survival. Toxicity profiles of two drugs were different and both drugs showed tolerable toxicities. In terms of event-free survival and progression-free survival, dasatinib was superior to nilotinib, but caution is warranted in interpretation because baseline characteristics including hematologic and cytogenetic response at the time of start with dasatinib and nilotinib and sokal scores at the time of diagnosis were different. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Outcome of transplantation of highly purified peripheral blood CD34+ cells with T-cell add-back compared with unmanipulated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors in patients with first chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 446-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet H. Elmaagacli ◽  
Rudolf Peceny ◽  
Nina Steckel ◽  
Rudolf Trenschel ◽  
Hellmut Ottinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Blood Stem Cells

Outcomes of highly purified CD34+ peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (n = 32) were compared with those of PBSCT (n = 19) and of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) (n = 22) in the HLA-compatible sibling donor setting. Median follow-up was 18 months after CD34+-PBSCT and unmanipulated PBSCT and 20 months after BMT. CD34+-PBSCT was associated with delayed T-cell immune reconstitution at 3 months and 12 months after transplantation compared with PBSCT (P < .001) or BMT (not significant [NS]). The estimated probability of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 60% ± 13% for the PBSCT group, 37% ± 13% for the BMT group, and only 14% ± 8% for the CD34+-PBSCT group (CD34-PBSCT versus BMT,P < .01; and CD34-PBSCT versus PBSCT,P < .001). The probabilities for molecular relapse were 88% for CD34+-PBSCT, 55% after BMT, and 37% after PBSCT (CD34+-PBSCT versus PBSCT,P < .03). Cytogenetic relapse probability was 58% after CD34+-PBSCT, 42% after BMT, and 28% after PBSCT (NS). After CD34+-PBSCT, 26 of 32 patients received a T-cell add-back. Hematologic relapse occurred in 4 of 22 patients after BMT, in 3 of 19 patients after PBSCT, and in only 1 of 32 patients after CD34+-PBSCT. The occurrence of a hematologic relapse in patients receiving CD34+-PBSC transplants was prevented by donor leukocyte infusions, which were applied at a median of 4 times (range, 1-7 times) with a median T-cell dose of 3.3 × 106 × kg/body weight [at a median] beginning at day 120 (range, 60-690 days). The estimated probability of 3-year survival after transplantation was 90% in the CD34+-PBSCT group, 68% in the PBSCT group, and 63% in the BMT group (CD34-PBSCT versus BMT, P < .01; and CD34-PBSCT versus PBSCT, P < .03). Transplantation of CD34+-PBSCs with T-cell add-back for patients with CML in first chronic phase seems to be safe and is an encouraging alternative transplant procedure to BMT or PBSCT.

5 Year Experience in Chronic Phase-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Imatinib Copy Drugs in a Peruvian Hospital

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4449-4449
Author(s):  
Aimee Torres ◽  
Juan Ramon Navarro ◽  
Jose Untama ◽  
Mariela Moreno ◽  
Sergio Murillo
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hasford Score

Abstract Abstract 4449 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In our Hospital patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) were treated with imatinib (Glivec) 400 mg qd from june 2001 to june 2006. Since july 2006, only imatinib copy drugs (brand names: Zeite, Imatec, Imatib, Millatus and Celonib, all of Indian origin) are being used to treat this disease at the Rebagliati Hospital in Lima Peru. We present here the efficacy, security, event-free survival, progression free survival, overall survival of patients treated with imatinib copy drugs. METHODS Retrospective and descriptive analysis of CP-CML patients treated only with imatinib since july 2006. They all initiated the treatment with 400 mg qd. Five year experience is presented here. RESULTS We analyzed data from 51 patients (pts) with CP-CML. Median age at diagnosis was 45.1 years (15–90), 49% female and 51% male, all patients were Chromosome Philadelphia positive. Low, Intermediate and High Hasford Score were 32%, 48% and 20%, respectively. Median time from diagnosis to start of imatinib was 7.6 months (0–123). Five patients (9.8%) began treatment more than six months after diagnosis. All patients had at least a 3 month cytogenetic monitoring. Thirty five (68.6%) and 39 patients (76.4%) achieved Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) and Mayor Cytogenetic Response (MCyR), respectively. Median time to CCyR was 7.6 months and 71.4% of these patients achieved it during the first six months of treatment. CCyR and MCyR were 38% and 67% at 3 months, 57% and 70% at 6 months, 63% and 83% at 12 monhts, 78% and 91% at 18 months, respectively. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed in 22 patients with CCyR and 18 pts (81.8%) had Mayor Molecular Response (MMR) in five years of follow up. Four pts (7.8%) progressed to Blastic Phase and all of them had Low Hasford Risk at diagnosis. Eight pts (15.6%) changed to 2nd line treatment. Two pts (3.9%) abandoned treatment. Only 1 pt (1.9%) had both anemias 3–4. Eighteen pts (35.2%) had neutropenia-3, 8 pts (15.6%) had neutropenia-4, 7 pts (13.7%) had thrombocytopenia-3 and 4 pts (7.8%) had thrombocytopenia-4. Neutropenias 3–4 were managed with filgrastim, as treatment and as prophylaxis. At 5 years, Event Free Survival (EFS), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were 82%, 89% and 91%, respectively (Figure 1, 2 and 3). CONCLUSIONS In our hospital, CP-CML patients treated with imatinib copy drugs obtained important cytogenetic and molecular responses with prolonged EFS, PFS and OS and an acceptable safety profile. Hasford Score was not a good prognosis predictor. Treatment with Imatinib copy drugs has proven to be an acceptable treatment in CML patients in our hospital. Disclosures: Torres: Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals A randomized trial of dasatinib 100 mg versus imatinib 400 mg in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (19) ◽  
pp. 3898-3905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerald P. Radich ◽  
Kenneth J. Kopecky ◽  
Frederick R. Appelbaum ◽  
Suzanne Kamel-Reid ◽  
Wendy Stock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy with imatinib (IM), dasatinib (DAS), or nilotinib is very effective in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Two hundred fifty-three patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia were randomized to IM 400 mg/day or DAS 100 mg/day. The proportion of patients achieving a complete cytogenetic remission rate was superior with DAS (84% vs 69%), as was the 12-month molecular response by the proportions of patients achieving > 3-log, > 4-log, and > 4.5-log reduction in BCR-ABL transcript levels. Overall and progression-free survival was similar in the 2 arms. Among patients who achieved hematologic CR, 3-year relapse-free survival was 91% with DAS and 88% with IM 400 mg. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were most commonly hematologic, including thrombocytopenia in 18% and 8% of DAS and IM patients, respectively. DAS induced more complete cytogenetic response and deeper molecular responses after 12 months, compared with IM 400 mg, and with a median follow-up of 3.0 years there have been very few deaths, relapses, or progressions in the 2 arms. In summary, DAS compared with IM appeared to have more short-term cytogenetic and molecular response, more hematologic toxicity, and similar overall survival. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00070499.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document