Improved Outcome in Adult T-ALL by Risk Adapted Treatment Strategies.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 682-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
Eckhard Thiel ◽  
Joachim Beck ◽  
Frank Griesinger ◽  
Frank Hartmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Improve Outcome ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Multicenter Study Group

Abstract T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) accounts for 25% of adult ALL and is characterised by specific clinical and biologic features such as phenotype with early (cyCD3+,CD7+) (E-T), thymic (CD1a+) ) (Thy-T) and mature T-ALL (M-T) (sCD3+). The formerly poor prognosis of T-ALL was more recently improved in some studies albeit not in all, even not in childhood ALL. Patients: To improve outcome of T-ALL the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL initiated two consecutive studies with subtype adapted therapies. 503 T-ALL pts were recruited between 4/93 and 10/03. The median age was 30 (15–55)yrs, 75% were male, 66% had mediastinal tumor (MedTu), 24% WBC > 100.000 and 7% CNS involvement with subtypes as follows: 53% Thy-T, 26% E-T and 21% M-T. Study Design: In Study 05/93 all T-ALL pts were treated uniformly with 8drug induction incl. prophylactic CNS (24 Gy) (CNSRAD) and proph. mediastinal (24 Gy) irradiation (MEDRAD) followed by 7x consolidation (HDAC/MITOX, HDMTX/ASP, reinduction, 2xVM26/AC, 2xCYCLO/AC) and maintenance (6MP/MTX). In Study 06/99 treatment of T-ALL was risk adapted with a shortened, intensified 8drug induction (CNSRAD in all but MEDRAD only in pts with residual MedTu after induction) followed by consolidation I (HDAC/HDMTX/VP16). Thy-T was then treated as standard risk with 6x consolidation (3xHDMTX/ASP,reinduction,VM26/AC,CYCLO/AC). E-T and M-T were considered as high risk and scheduled for stem cell transplantation (SCT) in CR1. Results: In Study 05/93 the CR rate in 291 pts was 89% (94%, 73% and 90% for Thy-T, E-T and M-T; p=.0006) and even 97% for Thy-T in adolescents (15–25 yrs) . Overall 4% failed to achieve CR and 7% died in induction. The probability of continuous CR (CCR) at 5 yrs was overall 53% and 64% for Thy-T, but only 30% (p<.0001) for E-T and M-T. The survival of CR pts (S) was overall 44% and 61%, 19% and 28% (p<.0001) for Thy-T, E-T and M-T. 10% died in CR mainly due to infections - particularly pts with prolonged cytopenias after prior MEDRAD. Immunophenotype was the only prognostic factor confirmed in multivariate analysis. This led to a risk adapted strategy in the subsequent study 06/99. The CR rate in 212 pts was again high (85% overall and 90%, 80% and 76% for subtypes; p=.04). 10% failed to achieve CR and 5% died in induction. 68% of pts with early/mature T-ALL received SCT in CR1 (13 allo sibling, 25 MUD, 11 auto). In these high-risk pts survival after SCT was surprisingly good with 64% at 3 yrs. Survival of all CR pts at 3 yrs was 57% (69% for Thy-T and 50%/34% for E-T/M-T; p=.007). Death in CR did not increase despite SCT (9% overall; 7% after SCT). Conclusion: In a very large cohort of prospectively treated pts excellent results for adult T-ALL could be achieved with subtype adapted strategies. For early/mature T-ALL a doubling of survival of CR pts from 23% to 43% in studis 05/93 versus 06/99 was achieved by SCT. Thus this is the first study showing a substantial benefit of SCT in these subtypes of T-ALL. To improve outcome further, new drugs for T-ALL (e.g. Campath, Cladribine, Nelarabine) are evaluated in relapse pts and in the ongoing GMALL study additional pts for SCT are identified by prospective analysis of minimal residual disease (supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe and partly BMBF, Grant No 01GI 9971)

Post Induction Minimal Residual Disease Levels Identifies a Group of High Risk Relapsed Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (rALL) with a Favorable Outcome Independent of Induction Therapy

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1294-1294
Author(s):  
Catriona Anne Parker ◽  
Marie Reeves ◽  
Sharon Love ◽  
Jeremy Hancock ◽  
Peter M Hoogerbrugge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Post Induction

Abstract BACKGROUND: The determinants of outcome in children with rALL are the duration of first remission (CR1), site of relapse and immunophenotype. High risk (HR) relapses are defined as those occurring with a CR1 of <18 months; B-cell precursor (BCP) with bone marrow (BM) relapse within 6 months of stopping therapy and T-cell BM or combined relapses at any time. All other relapses are defined as standard risk (SR). In the UKALLR3 clinical trial for rALL, HR patients had a lower CR2 rate, higher post induction MRD and inferior survival when compared to SR patients treated in identical fashion. We investigated the effect of further intensifying induction therapy with clofarabine in HR patients. METHODS: Clofarabine was added to the UKALLR3 consolidation block of cyclophosphamide, etoposide (CCE) and used as induction therapy, with dexamethasone and PEG-Asparaginase for HR patients. The previous induction block with mitoxantrone (M) was given as consolidation and all patients were eligible for stem cell transplantation (SCT) with any donor after a third intensification block. The outcomes assessed were improvements in CR2, MRD and progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to historical controls of patients receiving idarubicin (I) or M induction in UKALLR3. A Fleming-style design, based on observed response and toxicity, was incorporated to allow an increase in the dose of cyclophosphamide from 300 mg/m2 to 440 mg/m2. RESULTS: 61, 39 at lower and 22 at the higher dose of cyclophosphamide, CCE patients were compared to 30 I and 69 M patients with HR rALL. Patients in the CCE group had a lower median age at presentation, but other prognostic variables were comparable. CR2 rates of 73%, 83%, 71% and low MRD (≤10-4) was seen in 32%, 0%, 25% of CCE, I and M groups. The higher cyclophosphamide dose was associated with improved CR rates, lower MRD but also increased toxicity levels in CCE compared to M group patients. The proportions of patients reaching transplantation were 43%, 60% and 55% of CCE, I and M patients respectively. 73/82 eligible patients received a SCT, 48 (66%) with matched and 25 (34%) with mismatched donors. The 2-year PFS with CCE, M and I regimens were 17% (11,23), 27% (19,34) and 30% (25,36) respectively (p=0.08). Outcomes of matched sibling, matched unrelated and mismatched SCT were comparable (p=0.9). Seventeen patients with a post induction MRD<10-4, had a 2-year PFS of 63% (50,75), compared to 21% (15,27) for 53 patients with MRD≥10-4 and 21% (17, 25) for the 90 patients with unknown MRD (p=0.005). All 4 patients with MRD≥10-3 prior to SCT and 8/9 not transplanted suffered a second relapse. Overall outcomes of BCP (2-year PFS 21% (15,28)) and T-cell ALL (2-year PFS 26% (16,35)) were comparable (p=0.9). PFS in BCP-ALL was 31% (24,38) and 13% (6,20) (p=0.1) for those receiving M and CCE respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We define two groups of HR rALL patients based on MRD levels attained post induction, independent of the induction regimen. Approximately a quarter of HR patients continue to have chemosensitive disease as evidenced by rapid MRD clearance (<10-4 at week 5). This group includes high-risk cytogenetics and T-cell rALL with MRD as the single discriminatory factor for outcome. These patients have a favorable outcome after SCT with any donor. In the other group (MRD≥10-4) over half of HR patients do not reach SCT primarily due to refractory disease (27%) or disease recurrence (14%). One third of patients relapse post SCT. For this group novel agents and newer treatment strategies are urgently required. Disclosures Off Label Use: Clofarabine 1st relapse childhood ALL.

scholarly journals Personalized therapy in pediatric high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062072092757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth E. Karol ◽  
Ching-Hon Pui
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Stratification ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
Minimal Residual

Although cure rates for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have now risen to more than 90%, subsets of patients with high-risk features continue to experience high rates of treatment failure and relapse. Recent work in minimal residual disease stratification and leukemia genomics have increased the ability to identify and classify these high-risk patients. In this review, we discuss this work to identify and classify patients with high-risk ALL. Novel therapeutics, which may have the potential to improve outcomes for these patients, are also discussed.

Single Immunophenotypical Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease before Autotransplantation of Non-Cryopreserved Bone Marrow Is Insufficient for Prediction of Outcome in High Risk Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4439-4439
Author(s):  
Beata M. Stella-Holowiecka ◽  
Krystyna Jagoda ◽  
Aleksandra M. Holowiecka-Goral ◽  
Tomasz Czerw ◽  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract For high-risk adult ALL patients alloHCT is a preferable option. However, a significant proportion of those not having a suitable donor may be successfully treated with autotransplantation (autoHCT). Based on our experience this treatment ensures low transplant related mortality below 3% and a reasonable overall survival and disease free survival of 60% and 45% respectively. The status of the disease before transplantation is an important factor for long term results. In childhood ALL most studies suggest that the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction evaluated immunophenotypically or with bio-molecular methods is predictive for outcome after different treatments including chemotherapy, alloHCT and autoHCT. The results in adult ALL are more controversial. Patients selection. Among 1205 haematopoetic cell transplantations performed in our institution 224 (147 autologous, 77 allogeneic) were performed in 205 adults with ALL. For this study we selected an uniform group of 81 patients fulfilling following criteria’s: Ph (-) ALL, status CR1, evaluable MRD, strictly defined autoBMT procedure performed until the end of 2003. Methods. MRD was tested before autoBMT (median interval 10 days) using 2 ore 3-color flow-cytometry, as appropriate. The atypical immunophenotypes were evaluated using the “quadrans” analysis in all cases and since 2002 also the “empty spaces” technique. The sensitivity equals at least 0.0001. For all autoHSCT bone marrow was used as a source of stem cells. The CAV conditioning regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg on d. -3, -2, cytarabine 2 g/m2 d. -3, -2, -1, etoposide 800 mg/m2 d. -3, -2. Bone marrow was not cryo-preserved after collection but stored in 40 C and re-transplanted after 72h. Results. In 41 patients; age med. 26 y (15–53), F/M=12/29, the MRD level was &lt;0,001: the MRD (−) group. In 40 patients; age med. 29 y (16–53), F/M=18/22, the MRD was detected at the level =/&gt; 0,001; MRD+ group. The ALL-immunophenotypes of MRD−/MRD+ groups were as follows; proB 4/7, preB 2/6, Common 18/19, B 0/1, preT 5/2, T 12/1). The interval from DGN to BMT was similar in both groups. The probability of LFS and OS at 10y calculated with median follow up time of 5y equaled; in the MRD(−) group 47% and 62% and in the MRD+ one 48% and 57% respectively (p=ns). The main reason of failure in both groups was a relapse which occurred after a median time of 277 days in the MRD(−) group and 134 days in MRD+ one (p=0.19). Conclusion and comment. Based on this observation we conclude that a single evaluation stratifying patients before autoBMT according to MRD level below or above 0.001 is not predictive for DFS and OS, because it informs only about the current amount of the disease but not about its opportunistic nature. In this respect a repeatedly confirmed MRD positivity should be more significant. Taking into consideration that the main reason of failures were relapses, this finding suggests also that in patients with chemotherapy-responsive ALL confirmed by stabile CR, the myeloablative CAV regimen is sufficiently strong to eliminate the residual disease at the level ranging 0.01–0.001. It may be speculated only that the 72h lasting incubation of bone marrow product before re-transplantation has also some kind of purging effect for leukemic blasts.

Outcome of Children with T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) and Standard Risk (SR) Features: Results of CCG-1952, CCG-1991 and POG 9404.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 680-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousif Matloub ◽  
B.L. Asselin ◽  
Linda C. Stork ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Harland Sather ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intensified Chemotherapy ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Children with T-ALL have generally had a poorer prognosis than patients with precursor-B ALL. Patients with T-ALL are more likely than those with B-precursor ALL to be > 9 years and present with WBC > 50,000/ul, bulky lymphadenopathy and mediastinal mass. Since 1996, the former CCG has stratified protocol eligibility for patients with ALL based on NCI defined Standard Risk (SR = age between 1-9.99 years; WBC < 50,000/ul) or High Risk (HR) groups, regardless of immunophenotype. In contrast, the former POG has treated all T-cell patients on protocols separate from those for precursor-B ALL. This report compares the outcomes among children with T-cell ALL treated on recently completed or ongoing CCG and POG phase III trials for ALL. CCG-1952 enrolled 2176 eligible children with SR ALL between 1996 and 2000; 106 (5%) had T-cell immunophenotype. Treatment was a standard BFM regimen with prednisone and 2 phases of delayed intensification (DI) with a 2x2 randomization of IT methotrexate (MTX) v ITT and MP v TG. From June 2000 to March 2004, CCG-1991 has enrolled 1794 SR ALL patients: 80 (4%) had T-ALL. Treatment included a similar BFM backbone with substitution of dexamethasone and a 2x2 randomization between escalating IV v oral MTX and 1 v 2 DIs. POG-9404 (opened 1996; closed 2001) was developed exclusively for T-cell disease and enrolled 363 patients with T-ALL; 84 (23%) fit the NCI SR group criteria. On the latter protocol, patients received treatment similar to that developed by the Dana-Farber Leukemia Consortium for high risk B-precursor ALL, with randomization to ± 4 cycles of high dose MTX (5 Gm/m2) and leucovorin. All patients on 9404 received 1800 cGy prophylactic cranial radiation while CCG patients did not. Outcome for T-ALL on CCG-1952 is substantially worse than for B-precursor ALL, with 5 year event-free survival (EFS) of 73% compared to 82% (p = 0.007). Interim analysis of CCG-1991 also shows a significantly worse outcome for T-ALL compared to B-precursor ALL: 3y estimated EFS 78% v 90%, p = 0.0002. In contrast, estimated 5y EFS for patients with SR T-ALL on POG-9404 is 88% (90% on the superior high dose MTX regimen). Comparison of the SR v HR T-ALL patients treated on POG 9404 shows a significant advantage for the SR group (5y EFS of 90% v 75%, p < 0.004). This is in contrast to comparison of T-ALL patients on CCG-1952 (SR) v the concurrent CCG-1961 HR study where T-ALL patients have similar outcome (5y EFS 73% v 72%, p = 0.77). These data suggest that patients with T-ALL and SR features have better EFS when treated with more intensified chemotherapy regimens. Because early EFS for T-cell patients treated on CCG-1991 is worse than on POG 9404, the former study was closed to further accrual of patients with T-ALL. The COG ALL Committee is developing a study for exclusive enrollment of patients with T-ALL using intensive therapy based on the current COG HR ALL regimen, regardless of SR or HR features.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF INDUCTION PHASE GLUCOCORTICOID USE ON ADRENAL SUPPRESSION IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Octaviana Simbolon ◽  
Yulistiani Yulistiani ◽  
I DG Ugrasena ◽  
Mariyatul Qibtiyah
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Adrenal Suppression ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Cortisol Levels ◽  
Standard Risk

Glucocorticoids play an important role in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, supraphysiological doses may cause suppression of the adrenal. Adrenal suppression resulting in reduced cortisol response may cause an inadequate host defence against infections, which remains a cause of morbidity and mortality in children with ALL. The occurrence of adrenal suppression before and after glucocorticoid therapy for childhood ALL is unclear. The aim of this study is to analysis the effect of glucocorticoid on cortisol levels during induction phase chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A cross-sectional, observational prospective study was conducted to determine the effect of glucocorticoid on cortisol levels in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Patients who met inclusion criteria were given dexamethasone or prednisone therapy for 49 days according to the 2013 Indonesian Chemotherapy ALL Protocol. Cortisol levels were measured on days 0, 14, 28, 42 and 56 of induction phase chemotherapy. There were 24 children, among 31 children recruited, who suffered from acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Before treatment, the means of cortisol levels were 228.95 ng/ml in standard risk group (prednisone) and 199.67 ng/ml in high risk group (dexamethasone). In standard risk group, the adrenal suppression occurs at about day 56. There was a significant decrement of cortisol levels in high risk group in days 14, 28, 42 against days 0 of induction phase (p=0.001). Both groups displayed different peak cortisol levels after 6 week of induction phase (p=0.028). Dexamethasone resulted in lower cortisol levels than prednisone during induction phase chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Long Term Survival Using Intensive Multiagent Chemotherapy for Relapses of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1953-1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan R. Rheingold ◽  
Nancy J. Bunin ◽  
Richard Aplenc ◽  
Ann M. Leahey ◽  
Beverly J. Lange
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Chemotherapy Protocol ◽  
Multiagent Chemotherapy ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Relapses of childhood ALL that occur on therapy are associated with a dismal survival. To improve the prognosis for these patients, we developed an intensive multiagent chemotherapy protocol consisting of an induction with idarubicin, vincristine (VCR), dexamethasone (DEX), and peg-asparaginase (PEG). Consolidation included high-dose cytarabine (ARA-C), etoposide (VP-16), and PEG followed by VCR and methotrexate (MTX). After an interim maintenance (IM), induction and consolidation were repeated followed by maintenance therapy lasting two years. Maintenance and IM consisted of alternating two week cycles of VP-16, ARA-C, and PEG, with MTX ,VCR, DEX, and PEG. Between 1992 and 2002, 53 pts (32M, 21F) received treatment according to this protocol, 21 of whom were treated as part of the original study (Leahey AM et al., Med Ped Onco34(5):313–8, 2000). Median time to relapse was 37 months from diagnosis (range 12–86 mos). Twenty-one pts were on therapy at relapse and 25 pts were <36 months from diagnosis. Relapses included isolated bone marrow (BM) (32 pts), BM and central nervous system (CNS) (9 pts), BM and testicular (3 pts), and extramedullary (EM) (9 pts). By present day criteria 26 pts were standard risk (SR), 23 were high risk (HR), and 4 were infants. Two patients died in induction, and 2 never achieved a second remission. All others achieved remission by the end of induction (92%). Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) are both 56% +/−7% (CI 41%–68%), at a mean of 47 months from relapse (range 0–141 mos). Patients with a first complete remission (CR1) duration <36 months have an EFS of 40% +/−10% (CI 21%–58%); >36 months CR1 is associated with an EFS of 70% +/−9% (CI 50%–84%). Of the events in all pts who initiated therapy,13 were from refractory/recurrent ALL (25%), and 10 pts died of toxicity (19%). Four pts died from chemotherapy induced toxicity (8%), and 6 died from transplant (BMT) related toxicities (11%). Fourteen pts in second remission proceeded to BMT at a mean of 5 months from relapse (range 4.5–8 mos), and 7 of these pts remain in CR2. Of the 39 pts who continued on chemotherapy, 6 pts (35%) with CR1<36 months remain in CR2 and 16 patients (57%) with CR1>36 months remain in CR2 or 3. The 19 pts who were treated on modern standard risk (SR) protocols (CCG-1881 to present) were more salvagable than their 20 high risk (HR) counterparts (CCG-1882 to present). Five year EFS for SR and HR pts is 67% +/−8% (CI 48%–80%) and 38% +/−12% (CI 16%–59%) respectively. Intensive rotating therapy with reinduction and reconsolidation improves EFS. Children with early EM relapses of ALL, CR1 > 36 months, and SR patients all have very good long term survival. Novel therapies need to be integrated into intensive relapse protocols for children with early BM relapse and children treated upfront on HR protocols. Figure Figure Figure Figure

Significant Improvement Of Outcome In Adolescents and Young adults (AYAs) Aged 15-35 Years With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) With a Pediatric Derived Adult ALL Protocol; Results Of 1529 AYAs In 2 Consecutive Trials Of The German Multicenter Study Group For Adult ALL (GMALL)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 839-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Gökbuget ◽  
Joachim Beck ◽  
Kalina Brandt ◽  
Monika Brüggemann ◽  
Thomas Burmeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Very High ◽  
Multicenter Study Group

Abstract Several groups have reported results from smaller series of AYAs with ALL. Outcomes with so-called protocols for adults were generally inferior compared to so-called pediatric protocols. The GMALL protocols were originally based on pediatric BFM protocols and have been consecutively optimized for adults since 1981. We report the results of two recent protocols 05/93 (Goekbuget et al, Blood 98(11):802a, 2001) and 07/03 (Goekbuget et al, Blood 110(11):12a, 2007). In study 07 high risk (HR) pts were identified by one of the factors: B-lin with WBC>30.000, late CR (>3 wks), pro-B, early T, mature T, MLL1/AF4/t(4;11). Pts without risk factors were standard risk (SR) and those with BCR-ABL/t(9;22) very high risk (VHR). HR/VHR pts were candidates for SCT in CR1. The major innovations in study 07 were: intensified, shortened induction with dexamethasone instead of prednisone, PEG-asparaginase (ASP) instead of native ASP, intensified first consolidation, 6x HDMTX/ASP during consolidation, matched unrelated SCT for HR/VHR pts without sibling donor and SCT indication in pts with persistent MRD. After amendments in trial 07 pts partly also received intensified PEG-ASP, rituximab in CD20+ ALL and imatinib in Ph+ ALL. Overall, 1529 of 3060 (50%) pts recruited into both trials were aged between 15-35 yrs. 642 pts from 94 centres were recruited to study 05 and 887 pts from 130 centres to study 07. Patient characteristics were similar for both trials. 70% had B-Lin and 30% T-ALL (61% c/preB, 9% proB, 7% early T, 6% mature T, 17% thy T) with no significant differences across age subgroups (15-17,18-25 and 26-35 yrs). Allocation to SR, HR and VHR was 51%, 35% and 14%. VHR incidence increased from 3%, 11% to 19% in age groups (p<.0001). The CR rate increased in studies 05 to 07 from 88% to 91% (p=.001), most prominently within the age range of 26-35 yrs (86% to 90%;p=.001) (table). The OS increased from 46% to 65% (p<.0001) (significant in all age groups). Remission duration (RD) at 5 yrs increased from 49% to 61% (p=.0001), most prominently within the age range of 26-35 yrs (46% vs 59%; p=.005). OS improved from study 05 to study 07 in B-Lin (45% vs 66%; p<.0001) and T-ALL (47% vs 63%; p=.0007) overall and in subgroups as c/pre B (50% vs 68%;p<.0001), pro B (45% vs 67%;p=.05), mature T (19% vs 61%; p=.005) and thymic T (59% vs 70%;p=.09) but to a lesser extent in early T (35% vs 48%;p>.05). OS increased in SR (58% to 74%; p<.0001), HR (24% to 58%; p<.0001) and VHR (36% vs 55%;p=.0003).Table 1Results of Induction and Overall Outcome in GMALL-Studies 05/93 and 07/0305/9307/03Total15-1718-2526-35Total15-1718-2526-35Evaluable64210625238488753458376CR88%91%88%86%91%94%91%90%ED3%1%3%3%4%0%3%6%Failure9%8%8%11%5%6%5%4%RD at 5y49%52%50%46%61%60%62%59%OS at 5y46%57%45%42%65%73%69%60% 15% vs 43% of all CR pts underwent SCT in CR1 in studies 05 and 07. The proportion of SCT increased from 22% to 68% (p<.0001) in HR and from 62% to 73% (p<.0001) in VHR in studies 05 vs 07. The OS after SCT improved from 36% to 68% (p<.0001), mainly due to a decrease of TRM from 34% to 12% (p<.0001). In trial 07 MRD in week 16 (after consolidation I) was tested in 353 pts. The proportion of molecular failure (MRD>0.01%) was 26% with no differences across age groups. OS was 90% in pts with mol. CR vs 53% in mol. failure (p<.0001). Amendments in study 07 led to further improvement with an OS of 71% in 274 pts aged between 15-35 yrs treated according to the final protocol version. We present here results of the so far largest cohort of AYA ALL pts treated according to pediatric-derived adult ALL protocols. Outcomes have significantly improved and reached a 73% OS in pts aged 15-17 yrs. Intensified treatment with ASP, MTX and targeted therapies as rituximab and imatinib and MRD based stratification have contributed to the improvement in study 07. SCT led to improved OS in HR and VHR ALL. Obviously, there is no indication for SCT in CR1 in young SR pts with an OS of 74%. Future GMALL studies will attempt to optimize further the combination of pediatric approaches and targeted therapies in adults. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe 70-2657-Ho2 and partly BMBF 01GI 9971. Disclosures: Off Label Use: RItuximab in ALL.

scholarly journals Clofarabine-Based Chemotherapy for KMT2Ar Infantile Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3406-3406
Author(s):  
Tanja Andrea Gruber ◽  
Deqing Pei ◽  
John Kim Choi ◽  
Cheng Cheng ◽  
Elaine Coustan-Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Severe Infections ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Rearrangements in KMT2A (KMT2Ar) are associated with pediatric, adult and therapy-induced acute leukemias. Infants with KMT2Ar acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a poor prognosis, with an event-free-survival (EFS) of 33.6-36.9%. In the context of the remarkable improvements in the treatment of childhood ALL, the dismal outcome of infantile KMT2Ar ALL and the lack of any significant progress for more than two decades are striking . The St. Jude Total Therapy 16 study (the most recently reported study of a program for childhood ALL that begun in 1962) yielded a 5-year EFS of 88.2% overall. Total 16 enrolled all subtypes of newly diagnosed pediatric ALL patients including infants, with intensity of treatment adapted to presenting clinical and genomic features, and early treatment response as determined by minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD). KMT2Ar infants were treated on an intensified high-risk arm and received clofarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide and etoposide (CCE) at two points during treatment: Induction days 22-25 and Reinduction I. Infants who lacked KMT2Ar and KMT2Ar patients who were one year of age or older received the same risk-directed treatment plan given to all other patients enrolled on study. A total of 28 patients with KMT2Ar were enrolled on Total 16; the 19 patients &gt; 1 year of age received standard-risk therapy, and the 9 patients &lt; 1 year of age received high-risk therapy on the infant arm with CCE. The probabilities of 5-year EFS and overall survival in KMT2Ar patients &gt; 1 year of age and those &lt; 1 year of age were 73.3% vs. 44.4% (p=0.071) and 84.2% vs. 55.6% (p=0.060), respectively. Six of the nine infants were MRD-positive on Induction day 15 prior to CCE (MRD-positive range, 0.012% to 13.7%; median, 2.13%) with MRD negative status (&lt;0.01%) achieved post CCE in six of the eight patients with data (MRD was 0.011% and 0.07% in the remaining two patients). The trend towards superior outcomes in older KMT2Ar patients was not due to a lower incidence of relapse, as the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 26.7% in patients &gt; 1 year of age and 12.5% for those &lt; 1 year of age (p=0.454). Five infants remain alive (four in CR1, one in CR2), while four expired in CR1. Three deaths were secondary to infection, including a multi-drug resistant soft tissue bacterial infection during Induction days 1-21, a respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia during Reinduction II, and a chronic parainfluenza 3 infection during Continuation weeks 70-101 that led to chronic pneumonitis and interstitial fibrosis. The fourth patient developed grade 5 pulmonary hypertension following induction, a complication potentially compounded by their presenting WBC count of 905 x 10 9/L and pulmonary leukostasis. A comparison of 3-year cumulative risk of selected major toxic effects of treatment revealed that high-risk infants had a lower incidence of asparaginase allergic reactions, osteonecrosis, hyperglycemia, and pancreatitis; in contrast, the incidence of fever and neutropenia, hepatic toxicity and seizures, was similar in high-risk patients regardless of age. Infants had a higher risk of thrombosis (46.7% vs. 23.1%, p&lt;0.001) and of severe infection (70% vs. 19.7%, p&lt;0.001). To further study the contribution of clofarabine to severe infections, we looked at the incidence in high-risk patients &gt; 1 year of age that received one or more clofarabine-containing Reintensification chemotherapy cycles prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplant in first remission (CR1). This revealed a higher frequency of infections in infants, suggesting a greater susceptibility to this complication independent from clofarabine exposure (mean number of episodes, 2.39 vs. 1, p&lt;0.001, Poisson regression modeling). In conclusion, treatment of infants with KMT2Ar ALL with chemotherapy including high-intensity clofarabine leads to a lower cumulative incidence of relapse but a higher risk of treatment-related mortality. Severe infections were a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Disclosures Gruber: Kura Oncology: Consultancy. Coustan-Smith: Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties; Nkarta Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Medisix Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Campana: Nkarta Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Medisix Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Juno: Other: patent licensing payments; Juno Therapeutics (a Bristol-Myers Squibb company),: Other: patents on methods for minimal residual disease detection.. Evans: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Emeritus Member (began Jan 2021): Ended employment in the past 24 months; BioSkryb, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Scientific Advisory Board, Chair: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pui: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Data Monitoring Committee.

scholarly journals The Strong Prognostic Effect of Concurrent Deletions of IKZF1 and PAX5, CDKN2A, CDKN2B or PAR1 in the Absence of ERG Deletions (IKZF1plus) in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Strongly Depends on Minimal Residual Disease Burden after Induction Treatment

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 131-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elif Dagdan ◽  
Marketa Zaliova ◽  
Petra Dörge ◽  
Anja Möricke ◽  
Martin Zimmermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Pediatric All ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Technical advances in the field of genomic analyses have stimulated a large number of discovery studies on etiological and clinical endpoints in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to provide new avenues for preventive strategies, diagnostics and treatment. Recently, deletion of IKZF1 (IKZF1del) was described as a poor prognostic factor in pediatric ALL (Mullighan CG et al., 2012). In our trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 patients with IKZF1del had a lower 5-year event-free survival (EFS; 0.69±0.05 vs. 0.85±0.01; P<0.0001) compared to those without, mainly due to a higher cumulative incidence of relapses (CIR; 0.21±0.04 vs. 0.10±0.01; P=0.001) (Dörge P et al., 2013). IKZF1delwas an independent prognostic factor in this modern protocol. However, on its own, and even in association with minimal residual disease (MRD) levels, its relatively mild prognostic strength limited incorporation in clinical stratification strategies so far. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the prognostic effect of concurrent recurrent genetic aberrations in association with IKZF1del to further refine a high-risk genetic signature for pediatric ALL treated on AIEOP-BFM protocols. For this purpose, we studied a cohort of 1100 German patients with B-cell precursor ALL treated on AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 with available characterization of genetic aberrations at initial diagnosis by MLPA (MLPA SALSA kit P335; MRC-Holland) and a PCR assay for detection of ERG deletions (ERGdel; Zaliova M et al., 2014). Validation of results was conducted by use of an independent cohort of 417 Italian patients from the same trial. BCR/ABL1-positive patients were excluded from outcome analysis. When single marker analyses were conducted, IKZF1del was the strongest determinator of outcome in the discovery as well as the validation cohort. When IKZF1del was analyzed in combination with PAX5, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and PAR1 deletions, patients with an additional deletion to that of IKZF1 had the worst EFS and highest CIR in absence of ERGdel and, consequently, were grouped as IKZF1plus (definition: presence of IKZF1del and at least an additional deletion in PAX5, CDKN2A, CDKN2B or PAR1 in the absence of ERGdel). This group comprised 6% of B-lineage ALL patients and had a very poor clinical outcome: 5y-EFS 50%±0.06 compared to 86%±0.01 in IKZF1plus-negatives (p<0.0001); 5y-CIR 45%±0.06 compared to 11%±0.01 (p<0.0001) and was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analyses including MRD, slow early response, prednisone response, ETV6/RUNX1 status, and WBC (≥100.000/µl) (hazard ratio for an event: 3.39; 95% CI 2.09 – 5.48; p<0.0001). Surprisingly, stratified analysis by MRD demonstrated that the effect of IKZF1plus was restricted to those patients still carrying MRD loads of at least 10E-4 after induction treatment: standard-risk group 5y-EFS 94%±0.06 compared to 38%±0.09 in intermediate-risk and 27%±0.13 in high-risk patients (p<0.0001); standard-risk group 5y-CIR 6%±0.10 compared to 62%±0.10 in intermediate risk and 55%±0.17 in high-risk patients (p<0.0001). Hierarchical clustering of gene expression profiles of IKZF1plus patients did not demonstrate association specific to the different MRD risk groups. Similarly, analysis of whole exome and transcriptome data from material at initial diagnosis in a very restricted number of patients could not demonstrate insights into the observed differences. Newly identified very poor prognostic ALL subgroup – termed IKZF1plus – represented worse outcome compared to that of IKZF1del or others as a sole marker. The differential prognostic effect of IKZF1plus at different MRD levels without currently discernable molecular explanations suggest a quantitative mechanism with higher levels of leukemic cell burden during the early treatment phases predisposing to evolution of a treatment resistant leukemic clone under exposure towards genotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Potential explanations for these differences in treatment response may be undetected sub-clones already present at diagnosis or underlying germline genetic variation associated with treatment response. Further analyses will be required to better understand this phenomenon. However, due to its strength, the definition of IKZF1plus is likely to aid in the practical implementation of newly detected markers for risk stratification in childhood ALL in a clinical setting. Support: EU FP7 (ENCCA, TRANSCALL), IGA MZ NT/13170-4 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Role of MRD Monitoring in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia after Allogeneic Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 983-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Balduzzi ◽  
Sonia Bonanomi ◽  
Monica Manenti Tech ◽  
Maria Dassi ◽  
Giovanni Cazzaniga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Long Time

Abstract Relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) after allogeneic transplant has very poor prognosis; whether early prediction of relapse by means of minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis could allow effective treatment is still to be assessed. Eighteen patients at high risk of relapse were prospectively monitored in a single transplant center. MRD analysis and clinical follow up were completed for the first series of 11 patients. This includes 9 males and 2 females (median age 11ys, range 2–16) who received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from compatible (5), one locus mismatched (1) or haploidentical (1) related or unrelated (4) donor for ALL in 1st (5), 2nd (4), or 3rd (2) complete remission (CR), after conditioning regimen containing total body irradiation (TBI) and etoposide (9) or others, and GVHD prophylaxis consisting of cyclosporine, associated with ATG in transplant from other than compatible related donor. Grafts consisted of unmanipulated bone marrow (9), containing a median of 6.6x106CD34+/Kg (range 1.7–8.6) and 57.2x106CD3+/Kg (range 24.4–96.2), or peripheral (1), containing 11x106CD34+/Kg and 174x106CD3+/Kg, or positively selected peripheral (1) containing 12x106CD34+/Kg and 0.04x106CD3+/Kg. Five patients developed grade II–IV acute GVHD, requiring ATG in 4 cases. Five of 11 patients are alive in CR at a median of 15 months (range 11–21), 1 died in CR at 7 months, 5 relapsed at a median of 8 months (range 3–23), and 3 of them died. Patients were monitored by clone-specific RQ-PCR of one (4) or two (7) Ig/TcR markers, with a sensitivity of at least 10−4. At the time of transplant 7 patients were positive at the analysis of the MRD, while 4 were negative; patients were monitored at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after transplantation, or according to clinical requirements. Among the 4 MRD negative patients, 1 remained negative and is in CR at 19 months, 1 became positive 6 months after unrelated transplant and relapsed 2 months later, 1 relapsed 30 months after haploidentical transplant, a long time after MRD monitoring had stopped, while 1 died in CR. Among the 7 MRD positive patients, 2 remained always MRD positive and relapsed 3 and 7 months after transplant, and 5 experienced MRD negativity at a certain time after transplant; 1 of 5 became MRD positive at the 6th month after transient negativity and relapsed 3 months later, 3 of 5 became negative since the 1st or 3rd month, remained negative, and are alive in CR at 9, 12, and 13 months after transplant, while the remaining 1 alternated negative and positive MRD results and is in CR at 6 months. In 5 patients quantitative MRD data allowed early immunosuppression tapering or discontinuation, yielding severe GVHD in 1, and DLI treatment was planned in 2, but refused in 1; 2 of these 5 are in CR, while 3 relapsed, despite 1 experienced transient MRD 1-log reduction and 1 negativization. In conclusion, MRD monitoring after BMT might direct either early immunosuppression tapering or DLI for prevention of relapse in high risk childhood ALL transplanted patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document