Determinants of Intracranial Hemorrhage Incidence in Patients on Oral Anticoagulation Followed at the Lahey Clinic.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1101-1101
Author(s):  
Simon Mantha ◽  
Ann M Pianka ◽  
Nicholas P Tsapatsaris

Abstract Abstract 1101 Background: oral anticoagulation with warfarin is used to treat venous and arterial thromboembolic disease. Its administration is associated with a risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), a devastating complication which usually results in death or severe disability. The international normalized ratio (INR) is one of the factors which can help determine the risk of ICH in a given individual (Singer DE et al, Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009). Materials and methods: using the DoseResponse® patient database at our institution, we carried out a retrospective nested matched case-control study to identify patient characteristics associated with the occurrence of ICH. The database was queried for the years 2007 to 2009. Each case was matched by month to 4 control patients having a routine INR determination for the monitoring of chronic anticoagulation. The following characteristics were captured: INR, age, sex, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, creatinine, history of pertinent medical conditions (hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, ischemic stroke, active cancer, substance abuse, cirrhosis), indication for anticoagulation (non-valvular atrial fibrillation, valvular atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism or other) and intake of antiplatelet agent. Blood pressure for cases was obtained from a medical encounter occurring before the bleeding event. The relationship between those risk factors and the odds ratio of ICH was determined with conditional logistic regression, using the SAS® 9.2 software platform. The initial approach consisted of stepwise regression with forward selection and backward elimination. Results: 31 cases of ICH were retrieved; they were matched to 124 controls. In the univariate analysis, the two groups differed significantly only in terms of their hemoglobin: 12.8 versus 13.5 g/dL for cases and controls, respectively (p=0.048). As for the INR, the mean value was 3.0 for cases vs 2.5 for controls. The distribution of this parameter was normal albeit more markedly skewed to the right for cases, with 3 values of 5.0 or more, compared to only one instance of this for controls. Most cases of ICH occurred in the setting of a therapeutic INR. The odds ratio (OR) of ICH (using the interval 2.01 to 2.50 as the reference) started increasing above an INR of 3.50, reaching its highest level in individuals with an INR value greater than 4.50 (OR=5.78, 95% CI=1.10-30.48). Mean blood pressures were similar between the two groups: 92 vs 89 mmHg for cases vs controls, respectively (p=0.252). The variables retained in the final regression model on the basis of statistical significance and clinical pertinence are shown in the table. The OR of ICH was 1.50 for increments of 1.0 in INR value (p=0.021), while it was 1.56 for increments of 10 mmHg in mean blood pressure (p=0.032). The presence of cancer, anemia and heart failure appeared to contribute to the risk of an event but the associations for those factors were not statistically significant. Conclusion: the INR is an important predictor for the incidence of ICH, but a supratherapeutic measurement is found only in a minority of cases; the risk of an event increases markedly with an INR above 3.5. Mean blood pressure is another important determinant of the risk of ICH in individuals on chronic warfarin therapy. Previous studies have shown that a diagnosis of hypertension is associated with an increased risk of ICH in the anticoagulated patient population (Berwaerts J et al, QJM 2000; Atrial Fibrillation Investigators, Arch Intern Med 1994; Singer DE et al, Ann Intern Med 2009), but to the knowledge of this author there has been no report describing the variation in this risk over the spectrum of mean blood pressures. This lends support to the generally accepted practice of aggressively treating arterial hypertension in patients on chronic oral anticoagulation. Multivariable Analysis Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catriona Reddin ◽  
Conor Judge ◽  
Elaine Loughlin ◽  
Robert Murphy ◽  
Maria Costello ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are common sources of cardioembolism. While oral anticoagulation is strongly recommended for atrial fibrillation, there are marked variations in guideline recommendations for HFrEF due to uncertainty about net clinical benefit. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the comparative association of oral anticoagulation with stroke and other cardiovascular risk in populations with atrial fibrillation or HFrEF in sinus rhythm and identify factors mediating different estimates of net clinical benefit. Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched from database inception to November 20, 2019 for randomized clinical trials comparing oral anticoagulation to control. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate a pooled treatment-effect overall and within atrial fibrillation and HFrEF trials. Differences in treatment effect were assessed by estimating I 2 among all trials and testing the between-trial-population P -interaction. The primary outcome measure was all stroke. Secondary outcome measures were ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, mortality, myocardial infarction, and major hemorrhage. Results: Twenty-one trials were eligible for inclusion, 15 (n=19 332) in atrial fibrillation (mean follow-up: 23.1 months), and 6 (n=9866) in HFrEF (mean follow-up: 23.9 months). There were differences in primary outcomes between trial populations, with all-cause mortality included for 95.2% of HFrEF trial population versus 0.38% for atrial fibrillation. Mortality was higher in controls groups of HFrEF populations (19.0% versus 9.6%) but rates of stroke lower (3.1% versus 7.0%) compared with atrial fibrillation. The association of oral anticoagulation with all stroke was consistent for atrial fibrillation (odds ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42–0.63]) and HFrEF (odds ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47–0.79]; I 2 =12.4%; P interaction=0.31). There were no statistically significant differences in the association of oral anticoagulation with cardiovascular events, mortality or bleeding between populations. Conclusions: The relative association of oral anticoagulation with stroke risk, and other cardiovascular outcomes, is similar for patients with atrial fibrillation and HFrEF. Differences in the primary outcomes employed by trials in HFrEF, compared with atrial fibrillation, may have contributed to differing conclusions of the relative efficacy of oral anticoagulation.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 338-341
Author(s):  
Merelijne A. Verschoof ◽  
Adrien E. Groot ◽  
Jan-Dirk Vermeij ◽  
Willeke F. Westendorp ◽  
Sophie A. van den Berg ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— Low blood pressure is uncommon in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We assessed the association between baseline low blood pressure and outcomes in patients with AIS. Methods— Post hoc analysis of the PASS (Preventive Antibiotics in Stroke Study). We compared patients with AIS and low (<10th percentile) baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) to patients with normal SBP (≥10th percentile <185 mm Hg). The first SBP measured at the Emergency Department was used. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, major complications <7 days of stroke onset, and functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin scale score). We used regression analysis to calculate (common) odds ratios and adjusted for predefined prognostic factors. Results— Two thousand one hundred twenty-four out of 2538 patients had AIS. The cutoff for low SBP was 130 mm Hg (n=212; range, 70–129 mm Hg). One thousand four hundred forty patients had a normal SBP (range, 130–184 mm Hg). Low SBP was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (8.0% versus 4.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.58; 95% CI, 1.13–2.21) and complications (16.0% versus 6.5%; aOR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.60–4.10). Specifically, heart failure (2.4% versus 0.1%; aOR, 17.85; 95% CI, 3.36–94.86), gastrointestinal bleeding (1.9% versus 0.1%; aOR, 26.04; 95% CI, 2.83–239.30), and sepsis (3.3% versus 0.5%; aOR, 5.53; 95% CI, 1.84–16.67) were more common in patients with low SBP. Functional outcome at 90 days did not differ (shift towards worse outcome: adjusted common odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.95–1.61). Conclusions— Whether it is cause or consequence, low SBP at presentation in patients with AIS was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and complications, specifically heart failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, and sepsis. Clinicians should be vigilant for potentially treatable complications. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.controlled-trials.com . Unique identifier: ISRCTN66140176.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (30) ◽  
pp. 2848-2859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Böhm ◽  
Martina Brueckmann ◽  
John W Eikelboom ◽  
Michael Ezekowitz ◽  
Mandy Fräßdorf ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims A J-shaped association of cardiovascular events to achieved systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure was shown in high-risk patients. This association on oral anticoagulation is unknown. This analysis from RELY assessed the risks of death, stroke or systemic emboli, and bleeding according to mean achieved SBP and DBP in atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation. Methods and results RE-LY patients were followed for 2 years and recruited between 22 December 2005 until 15 December 2007. 18.113 patients were randomized in 951 centres in 54 countries and 18,107 patients with complete blood pressure (BP) data were analysed with a median follow-up of 2.0 years and a complete follow-up in 99.9%. The association between achieved mean SBP and DBP on all-cause death, stroke and systemic embolic events (SSE), major, and any bleeding were explored. On treatment, SBP &gt;140 mmHg and &lt;120 mmHg was associated with all-cause death compared with SBP 120–130 mmHg (reference). For SSE, risk was unchanged at SBP &lt;110 mmHg but increased at 140–160 mmHg (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.81; 1.40–2.33) and SBP ≥160 mmHg (HR 3.35; 2.09–5.36). Major bleeding events were also increased at &lt;110 mmHg and at 110 to &lt;120 mmHg. Interestingly, there was no increased risk of major bleeding at SBP &gt;130 mmHg. Similar patterns were observed for DBP with an increased risk at &lt;70 mmHg (HR 1.55; 1.35–1.78) and &gt;90 mmHg (HR 1.88; 1.43–2.46) for all-cause death compared to 70 to &lt;80 mmHg (reference). Risk for any bleeding was increased at low DBP &lt;70 mmHg (HR 1.46; 1.37–1.56) at DBP 80 to &lt;90 mmHg (HR 1.13; 1.06–1.31) without increased risk at higher achieved DBP. Dabigatran 150 mg twice daily showed an advantage in all patients for all-cause death and SSE and there was an advantage for 110 mg dabigatran twice daily for major bleeding and any bleeding irrespective of SBP or DBP achieved. Similar results were obtained for baseline BP, time-updated BP, and BP as time-varying covariate. Conclusion Low achieved SBP associates with increased risk of death, SSE, and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation. Major bleeding events did not occur at higher BP. Low BP might identify high-risk patients not only for death but also for high bleeding risks. Clinical trial registration  ClinicalTrials.gov—Identifier: NCT00262600.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 448-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuyuki Shiraishi ◽  
Shun Kohsaka ◽  
Toshiomi Katsuki ◽  
Kazumasa Harada ◽  
Tetsuro Miyazaki ◽  
...  

Background: The absence of high quality, large-scale data that indicates definitive mortality benefits does not allow for firm conclusions on the role of intravenous vasodilators in acute heart failure. We aimed to investigate the associations between intravenous vasodilators and clinical outcomes in acute heart failure patients, with a specific focus on patient profiles and type of vasodilators. Methods: Data of 26,212 consecutive patients urgently hospitalised for a primary diagnosis of acute heart failure between 2009 and 2015 were extracted from a government-funded multicentre data registration system. Propensity scores were calculated with multiple imputations and 1:1 matching performed between patients with and without vasodilator use. The primary endpoint was inhospital mortality. Results: On direct comparison of the vasodilator and non-vasodilator groups after propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the inhospital mortality rates (7.5% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P=0.098) or length of intensive/cardiovascular care unit stay and hospital stay between the two groups. However, there was a substantial difference in baseline systolic blood pressure by vasodilator type; favourable impacts of vasodilator use on inhospital mortality were observed among patients who had higher systolic blood pressures and those who had no atrial fibrillation on admission. Furthermore, when compared to nitrates, the use of carperitide (natriuretic peptide agent) was significantly associated with worse outcomes, especially in patients with intermediate systolic blood pressures. Conclusions: In acute heart failure patients, vasodilator use was not universally associated with improved inhospital outcomes; rather, its effect depended on individual clinical presentation: patients with higher systolic blood pressure and no atrial fibrillation seemed to benefit maximally from vasodilators. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR identifier, UMIN000013128


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Groenewegen ◽  
Victor W. Zwartkruis ◽  
Betül Cekic ◽  
Rudolf. A. de Boer ◽  
Michiel Rienstra ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Diabetes has strongly been linked to atrial fibrillation, ischaemic heart disease and heart failure. The epidemiology of these cardiovascular diseases is changing, however, due to changes in prevalence of obesity-related conditions and preventive measures. Recent population studies on incidence of atrial fibrillation, ischaemic heart disease and heart failure in patients with diabetes are needed. Methods A dynamic longitudinal cohort study was performed using primary care databases of the Julius General Practitioners’ Network. Diabetes status was determined at baseline (1 January 2014 or upon entering the cohort) and participants were followed-up for atrial fibrillation, ischaemic heart disease and heart failure until 1 February 2019. Age and sex-specific incidence and incidence rate ratios were calculated. Results Mean follow-up was 4.2 years, 12,168 patients were included in the diabetes group, and 130,143 individuals in the background group. Incidence rate ratios, adjusted for age and sex, were 1.17 (95% confidence interval 1.06–1.30) for atrial fibrillation, 1.66 (1.55–1.83) for ischaemic heart disease, and 2.36 (2.10–2.64) for heart failure. Overall, incidence rate ratios were highest in the younger age categories, converging thereafter. Conclusion There is a clear association between diabetes and incidence of the major chronic progressive heart diseases, notably with heart failure with a more than twice increased risk.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1514
Author(s):  
Hilde Espnes ◽  
Jocasta Ball ◽  
Maja-Lisa Løchen ◽  
Tom Wilsgaard ◽  
Inger Njølstad ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to explore sex-specific associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP), hypertension, and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) subtypes, including paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent AF, in a general population. A total of 13,137 women and 11,667 men who participated in the fourth survey of the Tromsø Study (1994–1995) were followed up for incident AF until the end of 2016. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted using fractional polynomials for SBP to provide sex- and AF-subtype-specific hazard ratios (HRs) for SBP. An SBP of 120 mmHg was used as the reference. Models were adjusted for other cardiovascular risk factors. Over a mean follow-up of 17.6 ± 6.6 years, incident AF occurred in 914 (7.0%) women (501 with paroxysmal/persistent AF and 413 with permanent AF) and 1104 (9.5%) men (606 with paroxysmal/persistent AF and 498 with permanent AF). In women, an SBP of 180 mmHg was associated with an HR of 2.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60–2.76) for paroxysmal/persistent AF and an HR of 1.80 (95% CI 1.33–2.44) for permanent AF. In men, an SBP of 180 mmHg was associated with an HR of 1.90 (95% CI 1.46–2.46) for paroxysmal/persistent AF, while there was no association with the risk of permanent AF. In conclusion, increasing SBP was associated with an increased risk of both paroxysmal/persistent AF and permanent AF in women, but only paroxysmal/persistent AF in men. Our findings highlight the importance of sex-specific risk stratification and optimizing blood pressure management for the prevention of AF subtypes in clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Iwahashi ◽  
J Kirigaya ◽  
M Horii ◽  
Y Hanajima ◽  
T Abe ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Doppler echocardiography is a well-recognized technique for noninvasive evaluation; however, little is known about its efficacy in patients with rapid atrial fibrillation (AF) accompanied by acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The aim of this study was to explore the usefulness of serial echocardiographical assessment for rapid AF patients with ADHF. Patients A total of 110 ADHF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and rapid AF who were admitted to the CCU unit and received landiolol treatmentto decrease the heart rate (HR) to &lt;110 bpm and change HR (ΔHR) of &gt;20% within 24 hours were enrolled. Interventions Immediately after admission, the patients (n=110) received landiolol, and its dose was increased to the maximum; then, we repeatedly performed echocardiography. Among them, 39 patients were monitored using invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) simultaneously with echocardiography. Measurements and main results There were significant relationships between Doppler and RHC parameters through the landiolol treatment (Figure, baseline–max HR treatment). We observed for the major adverse events (MAE) during initial hospitalization, which included cardiac death, HF prolongation (required intravenous treatment at 30 days), and worsening renal function (WRF). MAE occurred in 44 patients, and logistic regression analyses showed that the mean left atrial pressure (mLAP)-Doppler (odds ratio = 1.132, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05–1.23, p=0.0004) and stroke volume (SV)-Doppler (odds ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–0.97, p=0.001) at 24 hours were the significant predictors for MAE, and multivariate analysis showed that mLAP-Doppler was the strongest predictor (odds ratio = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.107–1.27, p=0.0005) (Table). Conclusions During the control of the rapid AF in HFrEF patients withADHF, echocardiography was useful to assess their hemodynamic condition, even at bedside. Doppler for rapid AF of ADHF Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document