Phase II Trial of Intravenously Administered AMD3100 (Plerixafor) for Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Following a Lenalidomide-Based Initial Therapy

Abstract Abstract 2992 Background: Patients with myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide-based regimens can have difficulty collecting adequate stem cells for an autologous transplant. Stem cell collection in these patients can be significantly enhanced by addition of the CXCR-4 antagonist plerixafor to the mobilization regimen. Plerixafor is typically given subcutaneously (SQ), with collection approximately 11 hours after injection to obtain maximum yield. Intravenous administration can potentially allow more rapid and predictable mobilization compared to the SQ route. We designed this trial to prospectively assess the efficacy of intravenous plerixafor administration in patients undergoing lenalidomide therapy. Patients and methods: Patients who were receiving initial therapy with a lenalidomide-based regimen and were undergoing stem cell collection within 12 months of their myeloma diagnosis were enrolled. Patients received GCSF at 10 μg/kg/day for 4 days followed by addition of plerixafor at 0.24 mg/kg/dose starting on day 5. Plerixafor was administered intravenously early morning (6–7 am) followed by apheresis beginning 4–5 hours later. Plerixafor was administered for a maximum of 4 days; but patients could continue apheresis beyond the 4th day at treating physician discretion. The aims of the study were to determine the proportion of patients reaching a stem cell yield of at least 3 million CD34 cells/kg by second day of apheresis, the safety and tolerability of intravenously administered plerixafor, and the overall rate of failure to mobilize (defined as less than 2.5 million CD34 cells/kg in 4 collections). Results: Thirty-seven patients were accrued between December 2009 – April 2011, and 36 were eligible for analysis. The median age was 61 years (range; 28–73); 61% were male. The median time from start of initial therapy to enrollment was 4.6 months (range; 2.6 to 11.1) and the median cycles of lenalidomide were 4 (range; 3–11). Thirty-four (94%) of the patients achieved at least 3 million CD34 cells/kg within 2 days of apheresis. The median CD34 cells/kg after 1 day of collection was 3.9 million (range; 0.7 to 9.2) and after two days of collection was 7.02 million (range: 1.1–16.5). Two patients failed the mobilization (<2.5 million CD34 cells/kg). There were no grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse events and one patient experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The most common grade 1 or 2 adverse events seen were gastrointestinal, namely nausea, diarrhea and abdominal pain or bloating. Grade 1 dizziness was reported in 8 patients. Overall, the infusion was well tolerated. Conclusion: Intravenously administered plerixafor is an effective strategy for mobilization in this patient group with low rate of failure to mobilize. It is well tolerated with toxicity comparable to the SQ administration. It also offers flexibility in patient scheduling with a convenient schedule for early morning infusion followed by apheresis later in the day. Disclosures: Kumar: Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Use of the investigational agent MLN9708 for the treatment of previously untreated multiple myeloma. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Comparison of Chemotherapy + G-CSF Versus Plerixafor (Mozobil®) + G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization In Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Lenalidomide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2258.2258 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2258-2258

Author(s):

Tomer M Mark ◽

Adriana C Rossi ◽

Roger N Pearse ◽

Morton Coleman ◽

David Bernstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Yield ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 2258 Background: Prior use of lenalidomide beyond 6 cycles of therapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to negatively impact stem cell yield, but this phenomenon can be overcome with the addition of high-dose cyclophosphamide to standard G-CSF mobilization. We hypothesized that the use of plerixafor (Mozobil®) would compare similarly to chemotherapy in rescuing the ability to collect stem cells in lenalidomide-treated myeloma. Methods: We performed a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization (PG) to chemotherapy + G-CSF (CG) (either high-dose cyclophosphamide at 3g/m2 or DCEP [4-day infusional dexamethasone/ cyclophosphamide/ etoposide/cisplatin]) in 49 consecutive stem cell collection attempts in patients with MM exposed to prior lenalidomide. The primary endpoint was the ability to collect sufficient stem cells for at least two transplants (minimum 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg), comparing results in terms of total exposure to lenalidomide and time elapsed from lenalidomide exposure until the mobilization attempt. The secondary endpoint was number of apheresis days required to meet collection goal. Resilts: Twenty-four patients underwent PG mobilization and twenty-five with CG (21 with G-CSF + cyclophosphamide, 4 with G-CSF+DCEP). The two groups did not differ in terms of total amount of lenalidomide exposure: median number of lenalidomide cycles for patients mobilized with PG was 6.5 (range 1.2–86.6), vs. 6 (range 2–21.6), for patients mobilized with CG (P = 0.663). The median time between mobilization and last lenalidomide dose was also similar between the two groups: 57.5 (range 12–462) days for PG vs. 154 (range 27–805) days for CG (P = 0.101). There was an equivalent rate of successful collection of 100% for PG and 96% for CG, P = 0.322. One patient failed collection in the CG group due to emergent hospitalization for septic shock during a period of neutropenia; no patient collected with PG had a serious adverse event that interrupted the collection process. Stem cell yield did not differ between the two arms (13.9 vs. 18.8 × 106 million CD34+ cells/kg for PG vs. CG respectively, P = 0.083). Average time to collection goal was also equal, with a median of time of 1 day required in both groups, (range 1–2 days for PG, 1–5 days for CG, P = 0.073). There was no relationship between amount of lenalidomide exposure and stem cell yield with either PG (P = 0.243) or CG (P = 0.867). Conclusion: A plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization schedule is equivalent in efficacy to chemotherapy + G-CSF in obtaining adequate numbers of stem cells for two autologous stem cell transplants in patients with MM exposed to lenalidomide; however, PG may be a less toxic approach than chemomobilization. Number of lenalidomide cycles has no impact on chances of stem cell collection success using either method. Disclosures: Mark: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; Millenium Corp: Speakers Bureau. Zafar: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Impact of Induction Treatment on Stem Cell Collection: A COVID Related Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149812 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4848-4848

Author(s):

Brad Rybinski ◽

Ashraf Z. Badros ◽

Aaron P. Rapoport ◽

Mehmet Hakan Kocoglu

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Number ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Number Of Cycles ◽

Time Required ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Introduction: Standard induction therapy for multiple myeloma consists of 3-6 cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) or carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd). Receiving greater than 6 cycles of a lenalidomide containing regimen is thought to negatively impact the ability to collect sufficient CD34+ stem cells for autologous stem cell transplant (Kumar, Dispenzieri et al. 2007, Bhutani, Zonder et al. 2013). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, at least 20 patients at University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center (UMGCC) had transplant postponed, potentially resulting in prolonged exposure to lenalidomide containing induction regimens. Here, in the context of modern stem cell mobilization methods, we describe a retrospective study that suggests prolonged induction does not inhibit adequate stem cell collection for transplant. Methods: By chart review, we identified 56 patients with multiple myeloma who received induction with VRd or KRd and underwent apheresis or stem cell transplant at UMGCC between 10/1/19 and 10/1/20. Patients were excluded if they received more than 2 cycles of a different induction regimen, had a past medical history of an inborn hematological disorder, or participated in a clinical trial of novel stem cell mobilization therapy. We defined 1 cycle of VRd or KRd as 1 cycle of "lenalidomide containing regimen". In accordance with routine clinical practice, we defined standard induction as having received 3-6 cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen and prolonged induction as having received 7 or more cycles. Results: 29 patients received standard induction (Standard induction cohort) and 27 received prolonged induction (Prolonged induction cohort) with lenalidomide containing regimens. The median number of cycles received by the Standard cohort was 6 (range 4-6), and the median number of cycles received by the Prolonged cohort was 8 (range 7-13). The frequency of KRd use was similar between patients who received standard induction and prolonged induction (27.58% vs. 25.93%, respectively). Standard induction and Prolonged induction cohorts were similar with respect to clinical characteristics (Fig 1), as well as the mobilization regimen used for stem cell collection (p = 0.6829). 55/56 patients collected sufficient stem cells for 1 transplant (≥ 4 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg), and 40/56 patients collected sufficient cells for 2 transplants (≥ 8 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg). There was no significant difference in the total CD34+ stem cells collected at completion of apheresis between standard and prolonged induction (10.41 and 10.45 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg, respectively, p = 0.968, Fig 2). Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between the number of cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen a patient received and total CD34+ cells collected (R 2 = 0.0073, p = 0.5324). Although prolonged induction did not affect final stem yield, prolonged induction could increase the apheresis time required for adequate collection or result in more frequent need for plerixafor rescue. There was no significant difference in the total number of stem cells collected after day 1 of apheresis between patients who received standard or prolonged induction (8.72 vs. 7.96 x 10 6 cells/kg, respectively, p = 0.557). However, patients who received prolonged induction were more likely to require 2 days of apheresis (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.1625) and there was a trend toward significance in which patients who received prolonged induction underwent apheresis longer than patients who received standard induction (468 vs 382 minutes, respectively, p = 0.0928, Fig 3). In addition, longer apheresis time was associated with more cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen, which neared statistical significance (R 2 = 0.0624, p = 0.0658, Fig 4). There was no significant difference between standard and prolonged induction with respect to the frequency of plerixafor rescue. Conclusions: Prolonged induction with lenalidomide containing regimens does not impair adequate stem cell collection for autologous transplant. Prolonged induction may increase the apheresis time required to collect sufficient stem cells for transplant, but ultimately clinicians should be re-assured that extending induction when necessary is not likely to increase the risk of collection failure. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Badros: Janssen: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Plerixafor and G-CSF For Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization In AL Amyloidosis: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4516.4516 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4516-4516

Author(s):

Esha Kaul ◽

Gunjan L Shah ◽

Chakra P Chaulagain ◽

Raymond L. Comenzo

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Number ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

High Dose ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Background Risk-adapted melphalan and stem cell transplant (SCT) is standard initial therapy for a minority of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (Blood 2013;121: 5124; Blood 2011;118: 4298). Stem cell mobilization is often accomplished with high dose G-CSF (16μg/kg/d) (Blood 2011;118:4346). In the current era with effective new agents such as bortezomib, many AL patients are receiving initial therapy and achieving profound rapid cytoreduction with organ improvement (Blood 2012;119:4391; Blood 2011;118:86). But not all patients respond and in some cases the duration of response is limited. In addition, the use of SCT for consolidation after an initial response, although reasonable, has not been systematically evaluated. Whether SCT is employed as consolidation or as a second- or third-line option, the efficacy and tolerance of mobilization become important issues. Because AL patients have organ involvement limiting chemotherapy-based mobilization options, we decided to explore the option of Plerixafor and G-CSF for stem cell mobilization, based on the phase III experience in MM (Blood 2009;113:5720). We now report the first experience with this mobilization approach in AL. Patients and Methods Patients were evaluated and diagnosed by standard criteria including, in all cases, tissue biopsies showing amyloidosis. They were mobilized and collected between 4/16/12 and 6/19/13 with G-CSF 10μg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) for 5 days (continued through collection process) and Plerixafor adjusted for renal function starting on day 4 and continuing until collection was completed. Results We report on 10 patients whose median age at mobilization was 58 years (range 46-72), 60% of whom were men. Median number of organs involved was 2 (range 1-3). Heart and kidneys were the most frequently involved organs (7 patients in each group). Median time from diagnosis to mobilization was 9 months (range 2-123). Eight patients had received prior bortezomib-based therapy. The median number of cycles was 3 (range 0-6). One had received a prior MEL 140 transplant 10 years prior and had relapsed, and 2 were treatment naïve, one of whom was 1 year status post orthotopic heart transplant. At the time of mobilization, 3 patients had non-responsive hematologic disease, 3 had achieved PR, 1 VGPR and 1 had achieved CR. Five patients had a creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL including 2 patients on hemodialysis. The target cell dose was 10x106CD34/kg for all but one patient (with previous history of transplantation). The median number of collections was 2 (range 2-3). On day one, the median number of CD34+ cells collected per kg was 3.6 x106 (0.4-6x106) and on day two 6.4 x106 (2.7-19x106). The median total CD34+ cells collected per kg was 12.5x106 (5-18x106). Two patients had grade 1 bleeding from the catheter site during apheresis and one patient had dyspnea with suspected fluid overload which responded to a single dose of intravenous furosemide. There were no significant toxicities observed with Plerixafor in mobilization. All patients went on to receive high dose chemotherapy with melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant. The median length of hospital stay was 25 days (18-32). The median stem cell dose infused was 7.6x106CD34/kg and median days to ANC > 500 was 11 (10-22), to platelets > 20K untransfused 22 (15-44) and to lymphocytes > 500/μl 14.5 (11-25). One patient who had VOD and persistent thrombocytopenia was given the remainder of his stem cells on day +31 with full recovery and normalization of the blood counts by day +65. Conclusions In the era of more effective initial therapies, an era in which AL patients are living longer, many with moderate organ damage, mobilization with Plerixafor and G-CSF was well tolerated and made it possible to collect ample numbers of CD34+ cells with limited leukaphereses in previously treated patients and in those with advanced renal failure. This approach not only allowed the collection of sufficient CD34+ cells for optimal immediate stem cell dosing but also permitted the cryopreservation of aliquots for post-SCT boost and potentially for future cell-based therapies. Disclosures: Comenzo: Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Randomized Comparison of Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide + G-CSF Versus G-CSF Alone Mobilization after Lenalidomide-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone (RVD) Induction in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.847.847 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 847-847

Author(s):

Raija Silvennoinen ◽

Tuija Lundan ◽

Pekka Anttila ◽

Jouni Heiskanen ◽

Marjaana Säily ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Cell Count ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Median Number ◽

Cell Harvesting ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Neutrophil Engraftment

Abstract Introduction Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) for eligible patients below 70 years of age. The main mobilization treatment in Europe consists of combination of cyclophosphamide (CY) and G-CSF. It is questionable if CY is useful in mobilization. CY as an alkylating agent might also have some negative long-term effects. Bortezomib seems not to have negative impact on autologous stem cell harvesting, but prolonged use of lenalidomide might hamper mobilization. There are only a few studies regarding autologous stem cell mobilization after RVD induction. We designed this randomized study as a substudy of the Finnish Myeloma Group Study (NCT01790737) to compare the results of CY+G-CSF versus G-CSF mobilization in autologous stem cell harvesting. The primary endpoint is the percentage of patients reaching ≥ 3 x 106/kg CD34+ cells (or ≥ 6 x 106/kg for two transplants), with ≤ 2 apheresis after low-dose CY+G-CSF vs. G-CSF mobilization. Secondary endpoints are need for plerixafor, graft cellular composition and engraftment after ASCT. Patients and methods This phase 2 study will include 80 patients below 70 years of age with symptomatic MM and eligible for ASCT. At registration the patients are randomized equally to arm A) CY 2 g/m2 + G-CSF 5 μg/kg or arm B) G-CSF 10 μg/kg. Before mobilization three RVD induction cycles are given. Each 3-week RVD cycle includes lenalidomide 25 mg daily on days 1−14, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneously on days 1, 4, 8, 11, and dexamethasone 160 mg/cycle. By this schedule the first harvest is estimated to be on day +10 in CY + G-CSF and on day +5 in G-CSF group. Apheresis will start with blood CD34+ level >10 x 106/l. The target cell yields for one and two grafts are ≥ 3 and ≥ 6 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively, and the minimum for one graft ≥ 2 x 106/kg. Plerixafor is given if B-CD34+ cell count is less than 10 x 106/l on days +10 or +5, respectively, or if the first apheresis product contains < 1 x 106/kg CD34+ cells. G-CSF support is used after ASCT if the number of CD34+ cells in the graft is less than 3 x 106/kg. Engraftment will be assessed by blood neutrophil count > 0.5 x 109/l, and unsupported platelets > 20 x 109/l. Results Fifty-six patients have been included, and the mobilization data for the first 37 patients are available for analysis. The primary endpoint was reached in 90% of the patients (18/20) in arm A and in 82% (14/17) in arm B (p=NS). The median number of apheresis to reach the goal in arms A and B is one (1-3) and two (1−3), respectively (p=0.03). The median number of harvested cells in the two arms is 6.2 (2.2−12.1) and 4.8 (2.9−7.6) x 106/kg, respectively (p<0.01). All patients achieved the minimum collection target of ≥ 2 x 106/kg CD34+ cells in both arms, and the target yield of ≥ 3 x 106/kg was reached in 95% (19/20) in arm A and in 94% (16/17) in arm B. Plerixafor was used in two (12%) patients in arm B. The median blood CD34+ cell count on the first apheresis day was 55.9 (13.0−118.6) and 35 (16.0−148.5) x 106/l for arms A and B, respectively (p=0.44). The median time from mobilization day 1 to the first apheresis day was 10 (10−13) days in arm A and 5 (5−6) in arm B. The median number of CD34+ cells transplanted, was 4.1 (2.2−7.3) and 3.2 (2.3−4.7) x 106/kg in arms A and B, respectively (p=0.01). In arm A the median neutrophil engraftment was on day +14 (9−28) (16 patients) and in arm B on day +15 (11−25) (15 patients) (p=0.68). The median platelet engraftment days were +13 (8−22) and +11 (8−21) in arms A and B, respectively (p=0.67). At ASCT the response rates in arm A were ≥ VGPR 65% (13/20), PR 25% (5/20), and 10% (2/20) were progressing, and the respective rates for arm B were 70% (12/17), 18% (3/17),and 12 % (2/17). Conclusions Preliminary results of this randomized mobilization substudy with a limited number of patients show no clinically significant differences between the number of harvested CD34+ autologous stem cells. However, in CY+G-CSF group the CD34+ cell target was reached by less aphereses. After short induction course of RVD it seems possible to harvest also for two autografts with G-CSF only mobilization. However, when compared to historical data the CD34+ cell counts in blood and grafts were lower than after bortezomib + dexamethasone induction, and also neutrophil engraftment seemed to be slower after lenalidomide-based induction therapy. We conclude that CY can be omitted in the mobilization regimen for MM patients who have responded to short course of RVD. Disclosures Silvennoinen: Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Porkka:BMS: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Pilot Study of Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells Mobilization with the Combination of Bortezomib and G-CSF in Multiple Myeloma and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1902.1902 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1902-1902

Author(s):

Divaya Bhutani ◽

Vidya sri Kondadasula ◽

Joseph P. Uberti ◽

Voravit Ratanatharathorn ◽

Lawrence G. Lum ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Median Number ◽

Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Group A ◽

Cell Mobilization ◽

Group B ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Background: Bortezomib has become an integral part of front-line therapy of multiple myeloma in a large majority of patients. There are preliminary reports which show that addition of bortezomib can augment the peripheral blood CD34 count during stem cell mobilization. In this single center prospective trial we added bortezomib to G-CSF to evaluate the effects of bortezomib on peripheral CD34 counts and collection. Methods: Patients aged 18-70 years with diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) or non-hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who were eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and had received no more than three prior chemotherapeutic regimens were eligible for the study. Patients were enrolled in two groups. Group A (N=3) received G-CSF 16mcg/kg for 5 days and proceeded to stem cell collection on D5 and then received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on D5 after stem cell collection and G-CSF 16mcg/kg on D6, 7, 8 and repeat stem cell collection on D6, 7, 8 till the goal was achieved. Group B (N=17) received G-CSF 16mg/kg on D1-5 and received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on D4 and proceeded to stem cell collection on D5. If the patient was not able to collect the predefined goal CD34, G-CSF was continued on D 6, 7, 8 and a second dose of bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 was given on D7. Mobilization procedure was stopped once the predefined goal CD34 collection (4 x 106/kg for MM and 2 x 106/kg for NHL) had been collected. Primary objectives of the study was to determine if addition of bortezomib to G-CSF will result in an increase in PBSCs by > 2-fold and to achieve median neutrophil engraftment 12 days post ASCT. Secondary objectiveswere to evaluate the collected product for co-mobilization of lymphoma or myeloma cells and to determine if the use of bortezomib increases the mobilization of immune-stimulatory Dendritic cell (DC) -1 subsets. Results: A total of 23 patients were enrolled and 20 were evaluable for the results. Only one patient with NHL was enrolled and rest had MM. Median age of pts was 57 years, M/F 8/12, median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 1 (range 1-3). The median peripheral blood CD34 count pre and post bortezomib in all patients were 28.8 x 106/kg and 37 x 106/kg respectively. All three patients in group A had drop in peripheral blood CD34 counts on D6 post bortezomib as they had undergone stem cell collection on day 5. In part B (N=17), 15 patients had increase in peripheral blood CD 34+ve cell counts with 4 patients achieved doubling while 11 pts had less than doubling of peripheral blood CD34 count after receiving bortezomib. Two patients had minimal drop in the peripheral blood CD34 counts post bortezomib. Median number of CD34 cells collected in15 patients (part B) were 5.06 x 106 CD34 cells/kg (range 4-15.1). 18 patients proceeded to ASCT and median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥500/cumm) post transplant was 12 days (range 11-16) and platelet engraftment (Plt count ≥ 20,000/cumm) was 18 days (range 15-27). There was no significant change in DC1/DC2 ratio in both groups following treatment with bortezomib and G-CSF (Figure 1). In group A all three patients collected goal CD34 count on day 5 and 2/3 patients collected >4 x106 CD34 cells/kg on D6 post bortezomib and1/3 patients collected 2.6 x 106 on D6 post bortezomib. In group B (n=17), 2 patients were unable to collect because of low CD34 counts on D4 and D5, 11 pts collected the goal in one day (D 5) and 4 pts required two days of apheresis (D 5 and 6). None of the patients received D7 bortezomib. Conclusion: Use of bortezomib during autologous stem cell collection was safe and well tolerated. Majority of patients had increase in peripheral blood CD34 counts post bortezomib administration on D4. Future trials should explore bortezomib as an alternate strategy to chemo-mobilization in combination with growth factors. Figure 1. DC1/DC2 ratio in group A and group B at various time points. Figure 1. DC1/DC2 ratio in group A and group B at various time points. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Off Label Use: Bortezomib for stem cell mobilization. Lum:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Equity Ownership; Transtarget.Inc: Equity Ownership. Deol:Bristol meyer squibb: Research Funding. Abidi:celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

No Influence of Previous Thalidomide Administration on Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v104.11.4902.4902 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 104 (11) ◽

pp. 4902-4902

Author(s):

Iris Breitkreutz ◽

Axel Benner ◽

Friedrich W. Cremer ◽

Doris Herrmann ◽

Anthony D. Ho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Total Dose ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽

Blood Stem Cell ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

To Receive ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract OBJECTIVES: In a joint study of the GMMG and HOVON groups, induction therapy with Thalidomide (Thal), doxorubicin and dexamethasone (TAD) is currently investigated in comparison with vincristin, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) followed by mobilisation therapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (CAD) and peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC). Munshi et al. (Blood 1999, Abstract #2577) described a dampening of PBSC-mobilisation by Thal treatment. We therefore investigated a possible influence of PBSC after previous Thal administration. METHODS: Altogether, data on 112 patients were analyzed in terms of PBSC-mobilisation. 56 patients were randomized up-front to receive 3 cycles of TAD (Thal 400mg/d orally; doxorubicin 9mg/m2/d, 4 30-min. infusions, day 1–4; dexamethasone 480mg total dose orally). 56 patients received VAD (vincristin 0,4mg/d and doxorubicin 9mg/m2/d, 4 30-min. infusions, day 1–4.; dexamethasone 480mg total dose orally) followed by mobilisation with CAD (cyclophosphamide 1g/m2/d, 1h infusion, day 1; doxorubicin 15mg/m2/d, 4 short infusions, day 1–4; dexamethasone 160mg total dose orally) and G-CSF (Neupogen 600mg/d s.c. or Granocyte 526mg/d s.c., day 5 after the end of chemotherapy until PBSC). Thal was stopped two weeks before CAD. Low dose heparine was administered to prevent deep venous thromboses in the TAD group. RESULTS: The median time was 14 days after the first day of CAD until PBSC in patients in both the TAD (range 12–18 days) and VAD group (range 10–19 days). In the first leukapheresis, a median total PBSC yield of 8,1x106/kg CD34+ cells in the TAD/CAD (range 0,3–34x106 CD34+ cells) and 8,7x106/kg CD34+ cells in the VAD/CAD (range 0,5–30x106 CD34+ cells) group could be harvested (p=0.31). In the best leukapheresis, a median total PBSC yield of 8,1x106/kg CD34+ cells in the TAD/CAD (range 0,7–34x106 CD34+ cells) and 8,9x106/kg CD34+ cells in the VAD/CAD (range 2–30x106 CD34+ cells) group could be reached (p=0.24). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in stem cell collection and yield after TAD versus VAD. Thalidomide as a part of induction therapy does not seem to have an influence of the peripheral blood stem cell collection of patients with multiple myeloma.

Download Full-text

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection In Patients Undergoing Induction Therapy with Lenalidomide Based Regimens: Failure Rates and Salvage Approaches

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2253.2253 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2253-2253

Author(s):

Shirshendu Sinha ◽

Morie Gertz ◽

Martha Lacy ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Suzanne Hayman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization ◽

Stimulating Factor ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 2253 Background: Lenalidomide based combinations are among the most common initial therapies for myeloma. Previous studies have suggested that lenalidomide therapy can result in suboptimal stem cell collection in patients eligible to undergo autologous stem cell transplantation, especially older patients after prolonged exposure to the drug. Many salvage approaches are used when attempting repeat stem cell collection in this patient group. Patients and Methods: Two hundred twenty four patients who underwent stem cell collection following lenalidomide-dexamethasone induction from July 2004 and December 2009 were included in the current analysis. Data pertaining to the duration of lenalidomide therapy, stem cell mobilization regimen, and the collection yields were collected from the medical records. Results: The median age at mobilization was 60.6 years (range; 29, 76) and 136 (60%) were male. There were a total of 245 collection attempts from among 224 patients, 21 (9.8%) patients attempting to remobilize after failing to collect the desired numbers of stem cells at the first attempt. We first analyzed the results of the initial collection attempt. The median duration of lenalidomide therapy prior to stem cell collection was 4 months (range; 1, 26). The mobilization strategies were GCSF (Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor) alone in 151 (67%) patients, cyclophosphamide (CTX) followed by GCSF in 29 (13%) patients, and GCSF plus AMD3100 in 44 (20%) patients. Among those receiving AMD3100, it was added either due to peripheral blood CD34 cell count not reaching the threshold for initiation of harvest or for poor first day CD34 cells collection in 34 patients and given in a planned fashion in 10 patients. Overall 15 patients (7%) failed to reach the peripheral CD34 cell counts required to initiate apheresis, and among those starting apheresis 6 patients failed to collect at least 2 million CD34 cells/kg; a cumulative failure rate of 9%. Another 18 (8%) patients failed to collect at least 4 million CD34 cells /kg. The CD34 cells yield on day 1, the total yield, number of collections, the average daily yield and the percentage of the targeted cells collected for each mobilization strategy including failure rates are detailed in the table. Twenty-one patients reattempted stem cell mobilization; including 14 that failed a first attempt and 7 did who not achieve the intended goal even though they collected more than 2 million CD34 cells/kg. The mobilization regimens were GCSF alone, CTX + GCSF, GCSF + GM-CSF (Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor) and GCSF + AMD in 5, 8, 3, and 4 patients respectively. All patients collected at least 2 million CD34 cells /kg and 14 patients (70%) collected more than 4 million CD34 cells /kg. The median CD34 cells collected with the second attempt was 5.4 million/kg (rang; 2, 19.5) bringing the median total collection for these 21 patients to 9.6 million/kg (2.6-19.6). Overall, of the 224 patients studied, all but the 6 patients who failed initially and did not attempt a second collection collected at least 2 million CD34 cells /kg and 197 (88%) collected at least 4 million CD34 cells/kg. Conclusion: While the overall failure rate of stem cell collection in patients receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide is 10%, a risk adapted approach of adding AMD3100 appear to decrease the risk of failure. However, majority of patients failing a stem cell harvest attempt can be salvaged with a second collection allowing these patients to proceed to a stem cell transplant if desired. Disclosures: Gertz: Celgene: Honoraria; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme: Research Funding. Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Dispenzieri: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Honoraria. Micallef: Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Stimulation of Adrenergic Activity By Desipramine Enhances Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Mobilization Along with G-CSF in Multiple Myeloma - a Pilot Study of Safety and Efficacy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3101.3101 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3101-3101

Author(s):

Aditi Shastri ◽

Ira Braunschweig ◽

Stefan Klaus Barta ◽

Noah Kornblum ◽

Olga Derman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Adverse Effects ◽

None None ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization ◽

Stem Cell Collection ◽

Stimulation Of

Abstract Background: Hematopoietic stem cell release is regulated by the sympathetic nervous system through the β (3) adrenergic receptor [Mendez-Ferrer et al. Nature 2008]. Peripheral sympathetic nerve neurons express the G-CSF receptor and stimulation of peripheral sympathetic nerve neurons with G-CSF reduced norepinephrine (NE) reuptake significantly, suggesting that G-CSF potentiates the sympathetic tone by increasing NE availability [Lucas et al Blood 2012]. Based on preclinical data, we investigated the NE reuptake inhibitor desipramine in HSC mobilization. Despite augmentation with Plerixafor (CXCR4 inhibitor), 20% of all patients fail to mobilize 6*10^6 CD34 cells/kg in myeloma and the collection rate with G-CSF alone is 51.1% [Diperiso et al Blood 2012]. The cost of upfront plerixafor is $9,081 per patient while desipramine costs $40. We undertook a feasibility study of adult patients with MM undergoing autologous transplantation (ASCT) to study safety and efficacy of mobilization with desipramine and G-CSF. Patients & Methods: From 2013- 2014, 10 patients between the ages of 18-70, eligible for ASCT were enrolled. Desipramine 100mg daily was administered for 7 days, starting 4 days prior to starting G-CSF (D-3) and continue along with G-CSF for a total of 7 days. CBC and CD34 counts were determined on Day+5. If CD34 counts were > 10/ul, stem cell collection was commenced and if < 10/ul, plerixafor was added as salvage therapy. The endpoints were safety and efficacy in mobilizing CD34 cells for ASCT in patients with multiple myeloma. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01899326. Results Six of ten patients enrolled completed the protocol and underwent stem cell transplantation. Reasons for not completing were 1. Lack of insurance coverage 2. Non-compliance with study treatment 3. Disease relapse prior to ASCT. Five patients did not have any grade 3 or 4 adverse events and 1 had disease-related Grade 4 hypercalcemia and Grade 2 AKI at the time of stem cell mobilization. No patients had significant treatment related adverse effects. All 6 patients who completed the protocol achieved the target collection of 5*10^6 CD34 cells/kg. Four patients achieved 6*10^6 CD34 cells/kg or more and the remaining 2 patients achieved 5.52 and 5.92 *10^6 CD34 cells/kg respectively. Among the 6 patients, 2 patients received salvage plerixafor. The median time to achieve WBC >1000/ul, ANC >500/ul and platelets>20k was 11.5, 11, 13.5 days Table 1. Age Ind. Regimne Disease status P PB CD34/ul CD34 collected *10^6 / kg Total CD34/kg collected Engraftment (Days to) Adverse effects from desipramine D1 D2 D3 D4 D2 D3 D4 ANC >0.5 Platelets> 20k G1,G2 G3,G4 1 62 Free λ VRD VGPR N 45.8 66.0 7.01 7.01 12 13 none none 2 50 Free λ VRD VGPR N 88.0 143.5 12.22 12.22 12 12 none none 3 58 IgA VCD VGPR N 38.0 67.7 31.6 4.22 2.75 6.97 13 17 none none 4 70 IgAκ VRD VGPR Y 2.40 40.2 16.6 4.31 1.61 5.92 12 14 none none 5 56 IgGκ VCD VGPR Y 8.70 11.9 37.1 19.4 1.33 4.57 1.61 7.51 11 12 none none 6 70 IgGλ VD RD Relapse N 76.2 97.1 5.54 5.54 11 20 AKI hypercalcemia P-Plerixafor; V-Velcade; R-Lenalidomide; D-Dexamethasone; C-Cyclophosphamide Conclusions Overall G-CSF + Desipramine combination appears to be safe, well tolerated and shows signs of efficacy. G-CSF and desipramine was successful in 4/6 (66%) and all achieved the stem cell collection in 2 days or less. Desipramine, GCSF and Plerixafor was successful in all (6/6) patients to achieve a target of 5*10^6 CD34 cells/kg. The mean number of CD34 cells collected in the desipramine+ G-CSF mobilisers was 7.24*10^6 CD34 cells/kg which, based on historical data, is higher than what would be expected with G-CSF alone even though 3/4 of these patients had lenalidomide as induction therapy. Based on these results, a phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy of G-CSF with desipramine with or without salvage plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma will be initiated. Disclosures Barta: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

High-Dose Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone As First-Line Treatment in Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4258.4258 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4258-4258 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Tomer M Mark ◽

Sujitha Yadlapati ◽

Lyubov Neglyad ◽

Jennifer Bourke ◽

David Jayabalan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Maximum Response ◽

First Line ◽

Disease Response ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Background: Carfilzomib (Cfz) is approved for use in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) at a dose of 27mg/m2 after escalation from 20mg/m2. The response rate for Cfz and dexamethasone (dex) as first-line therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) is unknown. Higher doses of Cfz have been shown to enhance overall response in RRMM (Lendvai 2014); the presence of a dose-response relationship of Cfz for first-line therapy in untreated MM has not been evaluated. A protocol of Cfz-Dex induction at two dosing levels, followed by BiRd (Clarithromycin 500mg PO BID, Lenalidomide (Len) 25mg for 21/28 days, Dex 40mg weekly) consolidation, and thereafter Len (10mg 12/28 days) maintenance, evaluated response and safety by Cfz dose level in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM. The ORR and safety data for Cfz-Dex induction stratified by Cfz dose is reported. Methods: 70 patients with untreated MM were enrolled in a phase 2 study of Cfz-dex. Cfz-dex is: Cfz IV on D1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 of a 28-day cycle at a dose of 20mg/m2 on days 1, 2 of cycle 1 and 45mg/m2 thereafter and Dex 40mg on D1, 8, 15, 22. After the first 26 pts were enrolled, the protocol was amended to increase the Cfz from 45 to 56mg/m2. Screening echocardiogram and pulmonary function testing were performed. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured with each cycle. Cfz-dex was continued until plateau in disease response (unchanged M-protein for 2 cycles). Elective stem cell collection was then performed in transplant eligible pts. This was followed by BiRd until 2nd response plateau, and then by LEN maintenance. Disease response evaluation was performed monthly with serum and urine protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and free light chain analysis; bone marrow biopsy with skeletal imaging was used to confirm MM progression or complete response (CR). Cytogenetic testing was performed on CD138-selected cells. Results: 25 pts received Cfz-Dex at 45 mg/m2 and 44 (out of 45 enrolled) pts at 56 mg/m2 for at least 1 cycle and were evaluable for response. 56% of pts were ISS II/III and 64% had high-risk cytogenetics as per IMWG definition. Pts received a median of 5 cycles of Cfz-dex in both the 45 mg/m2 (range 1-10) and 56 mg/m2 groups (range 1-14). Maximum response to Cfz-dex is shown in Table 1. There was no difference in response between the 45 and 56mg/m2 groups (P = 0.20). Median time to PR and maximum response for the 45 and 56 mg/m2 cohorts were both 2 and 3 cycles, respectively. 42 pts had stem cell harvest. All collected stem cells to support at least two transplants (> 5 x 10^6 CD34/kg) in one mobilization attempt using G-CSF, with mean yield of 13.74x10^6 CD34/kg (range 5.94-32.14). 79% collected in 1 apheresis session. Adverse events (AEs) were notable for renal failure in 3 pts (2 Grade 2, 1 grade 3) and congestive heart failure in 1 pt (grade 3). Two of the 3 cases of renal failure occurred in the 56 mg/m2 cohort, all other AEs occurred in the 45mg/m2 cohort. All AEs resolved after stopping Cfz. There was no correlation with TTE, PFTs or serial BNPs and development of cardiac or pulmonary toxicity. Discussion: This is the first prospective study evaluating induction responses to Cfz-dex in MM. Cfz-dex is safe and active in induction at both 45 and 56 mg/m2, with an ORR of 93% and rate of >= VGPR of 68% despite a primarily high risk population. Specific dose did not correlate with response. Higher dose of Cfz did not lead to more toxicity. Cfz-dex induction led to successful stem cell collection in all attempts. Cfz-dex is a highly active and well-tolerated induction regimen. Transitioning to IMiD-based therapy after maximum response led to deeper responses with a remarkable 97% rate of VGPR or better. Table 1. Maximum Response with Cfz-Dex, followed by BiRD consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance: Response Category Cfz-Dex 45 mg/m2 Cfz-Dex 56 mg/m2 Overall Cfz-Dex phase BiRD phase Lenalidomide maintenance phase N = 25 (%) N = 44 (%) N = 69 (%) N = 44 (%) N = 33 (%) >= PR 22 (88) 42 (95) 65 (93) 44 (100) 33 (100) >= VGPR 16 (72) 31 (70) 45 (68) 42 (95) 32 (97) >= CR 3 (12) 2 (5) 5 (7) 12 (27) 15 (45) SCR 3 (12) 2 (5) 5 (7) 9 (20) 13 (39) CR 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (7) 2 (6) VGPR 13 (52) 29 (66) 42 (61) 30 (68) 17 (52) PR 6 (24) 11 (25) 17 (25) 2 (5) 1 (3) SD 3 (12) 2 (5) 5 (7) 0 0 Disclosures Mark: Calgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Carfilzomib as first line therapy in myeloma.. Rossi:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Pearse:Celegen: Consultancy. Perry:Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Pekle:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Huang:Celgene: Research Funding. Coleman:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Chen-Kiang:Celgene: Consultancy. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Chemotherapy Combined with Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) for Mobilization of CD34+ Cells in Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5441.5441 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5441-5441

Author(s):

Gaofeng Zheng ◽

Yanlong Zheng ◽

Yi Luo ◽

Jimin Shi ◽

Weiyan Zheng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Success Rate ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽

Collection Rate ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Stem Cell Collection ◽

The Ideal

Abstract Objective: To investigate and analyze factors which effect autologous stem cell collection in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM) during chemotherapy combined with G-CSF mobilization, for improving quality and effectiveness of autologous stem cell transplantation. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed from April 1, 2006 to October 31, 2013 in our hospital and 128 lymphoma and MM patients whose autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were collected including 75 patients with malignant lymphoma,7 cases of Hodgkin's lymphoma and 68 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) cases as well as 53 MM patients were enrolled. The stem cells of all patients were mobilized by chemotherapy combined with G-CSF and collected via a continuous flow cell separation instrument (COBE Spectra, Lakewood, CO). Mobilize failure was defined when the amount of CD34 + cells was less than 2.0 x 106 / kg, whereas ≥2.0 * 106 / kg was defined as successful mobilization. More than 5.0x 106 cells / kg or more was considrered as ideal mobilization. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of factors for mobilization failure, successful mobilization and ideal mobilization acquisition were performed. Results: There were more CD34+ cells in MM patients than in lymphoma patients (P = 0.064). The collection rates of CD34 + cells in MM patients were ≥ 2.0 x106 / kg in 64.8% (83 cases) and ≥ 5.0 x 106 / kg in 35.2% (45 cases). MM patients with a success collection ratio was 73.6 % (39/53) and the ideal collection rate was 43.4% (23/53), which was higher than in the NHL group with a success rate and ideal rate of 58.7% (44/75) and 30.7% (23/75). A total of 35.2 % (45 cases, including 31MM cases and 14 lymphoma cases) a mobilization was not successful. Conclusion: In different chemotherapy regimens in patients with lymphoma, remission, ever use MTX and/or Ara-c treatment and collecting the outer peripheral hematocrit could significantly affect the success rate of stem cell collection; In MM patients, who received lenalidomide treatment and multiple courses of treatment, still not got CR, which these reasons were the factors of non- successful mobilization.Although Plerixafor and peripheral blood CD34-positive cell counts could help to improve the success collection rate and predict collection rate, but there is still a need for further improvement of the current mobilization protocols, recognizing the ideal stem cell collection dynamics, efficiency and cost in order to select the appropriate mobilization protocols. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text