Novel Germline CEBPA Sequence Variations in Familial AML and Cytogenetically Normal AML.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2566-2566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupa A. Udani ◽  
Mary Parlow ◽  
Lihui Yin ◽  
Daniel B. Bellissimo

Abstract Abstract 2566 The CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha encoded by CEBPA gene is a transcription factors involved in myeloid lineage differentiation. Somatic CEBPA mutations are associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with normal to intermediate karyotype and lacking the internal tandem duplication in the fms-like tyrosine kinase -3 gene (FLT3/ITD) or mutation in the nucleophosmin gene (NPM1). N-terminal CEBPA mutations typically result in a frame shift encoding a truncated form of the 42-kD CEBPα protein and potentially increase translation of the alternative 30-kD isoform. The 30-kD isoform functions as a dominant negative regulator of the full-length 42-kD isoform of the CEBPα protein. C-terminal mutations are generally in-frame insertion/deletions in the DNA binding or the leucine zipper domains that cause alteration of the dimerization domain (bZIP). Germline mutations in CEBPA gene are recognized as the major cause of familial acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Familial AML is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner with complete penetrance. In contrast to somatic AML, the age onset of familial AML is earlier ranging from 4 to 39 years. The overall survival of the familial AML patients with germline CEBPA mutation is ∼50%–65% better than ∼34%–50% observed with the somatic CEBPA mutations (FLT3/NPM1 negative). In all of the familial AML pedigrees reported, the mutations were frame-shift insertions/deletions in the N-terminal domain resulting in translation of a truncated form of the CEBPα protein. We have identified four novel germline sequence variants in patients with history of familial AML and unknown karyotypes (cases 1–4). The patients' age ranges from 3 to 32 years. Of the four novel variants, one variant was identified in the C-terminal region of the gene. This is the first reported C-terminal variant detected in the proband of a familial AML pedigree. The variant is out of frame insertion/deletion of ∼401 bp in the C-terminal region of the CEBPA gene (there is a deletion ‘∼171bp then an insertion of 401bp). Another novel C-terminal variation was identified in a patient with cytogenetically normal AML undergoing testing for somatically acquired CEBPA mutations (case 5). The detection of this C-terminal variation in a buccal swab sample confirmed the germline origin of the variation. In two additional cases (cases 6 and 7), we observed that one of the two sequence variations identified was no longer present after treatment, suggesting the remaining variation was germline in origin. Our results demonstrate that germline C-terminal CEBPA mutations can cause familial AML and that germline CEBPA mutations may be identified in cytogenetically normal AML patients. The possibility of germline variants should be considered in AML patients since other family members, who may be possible transplant donors for the patient, may have also inherited the same germline variant. Case AML Type Sequence variation CEBPA gene region 1 Familial AML c.142delG; p.Ala48fs N terminal 2 c.168C>A; p.Cys56* N terminal 3 c.175G>T; p.Glu59* N terminal 4 c.643_814delins401; p.Thr216fs C terminal 5 Somatic AML c.1073delC; p.Ala358fs C terminal 6 c.68_78del; p.Pro23fs N terminal 7 c. 938T>G; p. Val328G C terminal Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1550-1550
Author(s):  
Yuji Mishima ◽  
Yasuhito Terui ◽  
Kengo Takeuchi ◽  
Yuko Mishima ◽  
Kiyohiko Hatake

Abstract Abstract 1550 Background: We previously reported that mutations of CD20 gene were found in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and we proposed that C-terminal deletion mutations of CD20 might be involved in relapse/resistance after rituximab containing therapy. Most of the patients that had mutation in the C-terminal leagion were diagnosed as CD20 negative by immunohistochemistry using L26 monoclonal antibody. L26 recognizes the cytoplasmic region of CD20 molecules, but no more detailed information about its epitope had been reported. So at first we determined the binding site of L26 antibody on CD20 protein. Then we developed novel diagnostic antibodies that recognize wide variety of CD20 molecular subtypes including those having mutations. Methods: To determine the epitope of L26 antibody, we established six sub-lines expressing various length of C-terminal truncated CD20 using an originally CD20 negative myeloma cell line. Then we carried out epitope-mapping using these cell lines. To detect comprehensive CD20 molecules including that having mutation in C-terminal region, we developed antibodies that recognize near the amino terminus of CD20 molecules (CD20N antibody). CD20N antibody is the only monoclonal antibody that recognizes N-terminal region of CD20 so far. Using these antibodies, we screened the specimens of the cases diagnosed as CD20 negative determined by L26-based immunohistochemistry. Results: The epitope-mapping revealed that L26 recognizes near the C-terminus of CD20. This suggested that most of CD20 molecules with the C-terminal deletion mutation or frame-shift mutation could not be recognized by L26. Then we screened previously diagnosed specimens and found several cases that having the cells stained by our novel antibody but not by L26. Genetic analysis revealed that all these cells had a mutation in the C-terminal cytoplasmic region of CD20. One of these cases, we successfully analyzed the phenotype of lymphoma cells with mutated CD20 in detail using cryopreserves living specimens. In this case, a frame shift mutation occurred due to one base nucleotide deletion, resulting in the translation of peptide of another reading frame of 41 amino acids with premature stop at the amino acid position 250. Interestingly, mutant CD20 molecule expressed adjacent to the plasma membrane, but rituximab could not bind to these cells. DNA sequencing study about genome and mRNA of CD20 gene suggested that the lymphoma cells of this patient had one normal and one mutated CD20 allele. Discussions: The C-terminal region of CD20 may undertake a pivotal role in presentation of the large loop where the rituximab binding site locates. Thus, deletion or frame-shift mutation of CD20 in C-terminal cytoplasmic region impairs the antigenicity against rituximab and it may cause resistance to rituximab therapy. The resistance caused by gene mutation thought to be irreversible. And it should be discriminated from transient downregulation of antigen expression. We propose here that immunohistochemical screening using CD20N antibody is very rapid and effective screening stategy that find out irreversible rituximab resistant cases. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4344-4344
Author(s):  
Amanda Scholl ◽  
Kentson Lam ◽  
Alex Muselman ◽  
Tingdong Tang ◽  
Shinobu Matsuura ◽  
...  

Abstract RUNX1 is the transcription factor described as the master regulator of hematopoiesis. Due to its central role during blood development, numerous RUNX1 mutations have been reported in hematologic abnormalities. Mice null for Runx1 die during embryogenesis, lacking definitive HSCs. Conditional Runx1Δ/Δ mice are viable, but exhibit a variety of blood abnormalities. The most salient defect in these Runx1Δ/Δ mice is expansion of the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) population, measured as an increase in number of lineage negative, Sca1 positive, cKit positive (LSK) cells. A shortened form of RUNX1 (RUNX1SF) lacking the C-terminal and part of the N-terminal domain (41-214) acts as a dominant negative regulator of RUNX1 and hence also models RUNX1 loss-of-function. A differential gene expression analysis of HSPCs derived from Runx1Δ/Δ compared to wild type mice uncovered GTPase immunity-associated protein family member 4 (GIMAP4) as one of the genes most highly upregulated. Previous studies have focused almost exclusively on the role of GIMAP4 as a pro-apoptotic protein during T-cell development. This study illuminates a novel non-apoptotic role of GIMAP4 in a formerly unstudied HSPC context. Runx1Δ/Δ mice were crossed with Gimap4-/- mice to generate a double knockout (dKO) mouse line. These dKO mice exhibited attenuated HSPC proliferation in comparison to Runx1Δ/Δ mice, suggesting that GIMAP4 functions in this HSPC expansion phenotype. BMT experiments using lethally irradiated C57 mice and RUNX1SF transduced wild type versus Gimap4-/-bone marrow confirmed this result. GIMAP4 also worked independently and coordinately with RUNX1 to influence individual progenitor populations. Common lymphoid progenitors (CLP) were affected only by GIMAP4. Gimap4-/- mice exhibited an expansion of the CLP population, consistent with its pro-apoptotic role in lymphoid populations. Conversely, both RUNX1 and GIMAP4 coordinately exerted an effect on myeloid progenitor populations. Runx1Δ/Δ mice harbored expanded granulocyte-macrophage progenitor (GMP) and common myeloid progenitor (CMP) populations. This expansion was not observed when GIMAP4 was also ablated. This suggests a pro-proliferative role of GIMAP4 specifically in myeloid populations. These opposing roles of GIMAP4 in lymphoid versus myeloid cells suggest a more contextual, cell-specific role of this GTPase protein. Ultimately, this study provides insight into how RUNX1 and GIMAP4 may coordinate to maintain HSPC homeostasis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2003 ◽  
Vol 185 (18) ◽  
pp. 5546-5554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian M. Fraser ◽  
Bertha González-Pedrajo ◽  
Jeremy R. H. Tame ◽  
Robert M. Macnab

ABSTRACT FliJ, a 17-kDa protein, is a soluble component of the Salmonella type III flagellar protein export system that has antiaggregation properties and several other characteristics that suggest it may have a chaperone-like function. We have now examined this protein in detail. Ten-amino-acid scanning deletions covering the entire 147-amino-acid sequence were tested for complementation of a fliJ null strain; only the first and last deletions complemented. A few of the deletions, especially towards the C terminus, exerted a dominant negative effect on wild-type cells, indicating that they were actively interfering with function. Two truncated versions of FliJ, representing its N- and C-terminal halves, failed to complement and were not dominant. We tested for FliJ self-association by several techniques. Size-exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200) indicated an apparent molecular mass of around 50 kDa, which could reflect either multimerization or an elongated shape or both. Multiangle light scattering gave a peak value of 20 kDa, close to the molecular mass of the monomer. Analytical ultracentrifugation gave evidence for weak self-association as a trimer or tetramer. It was known from previous studies that FliJ interacts with the N-terminal region of FliH, a negative regulator of the ATPase FliI. Using both truncation and deletion versions of FliJ, we now show that it is its C-terminal region that is responsible for this interaction. We also show that FliJ interacts with the soluble cytoplasmic domain of the largest membrane component of the export apparatus, FlhA; although small deletions in FliJ did not interfere with the association, both truncated versions failed to associate, indicating that a substantial amount of the central region of the FliJ sequence participates in the association. We present a model summarizing these multiple interactions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-308
Author(s):  
Suzuka Onishi ◽  
Kohsuke Kataoka

Insulin plays a central role in glucose homeostasis and is produced exclusively by pancreatic islet β-cells. Insulin gene transcription is regulated by a set of β-cell-enriched transcription factors that bind to cis-regulatory elements within the promoter region, and regulation of the insulin gene promoter is closely linked to β-cell functionality. PIASy, a member of the PIAS family of SUMO E3 ligases, is thought to affect insulin gene transcription, but its mechanism of action is not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that PIASy interacts with MafA and represses insulin gene promoter activity. MafA is a β-cell-restricted basic leucine-zipper transcriptional activator that binds to the C1 element of the insulin gene promoter. In line with previous studies showing the transactivator domain of MafA is SUMOylated, PIASy enhanced the SUMOylation of MafA. However, a SUMOylation-deficient mutant of MafA was still repressed by PIASy, indicating that this modification is dispensable for repression. Using a series of MafA and PIASy mutants, we found that the basic domain of MafA and the amino-terminal region of PIASy containing the SAP domain are necessary for their interaction. In addition, SUMO-interacting motif 1 (SIM1) at the carboxyl-terminal region of PIASy was required to repress the synergistic transactivation of MafA, Pdx1, and Beta2, transcription factors playing central roles in β-cell differentiation and function. The PINIT and SP-RING domains in the middle region of PIASy were dispensable. These findings suggest that PIASy binds to MafA through the SAP domain and negatively regulates the insulin gene promoter through a novel SIM1-dependent mechanism.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3827-3827
Author(s):  
Francesca Ferraro ◽  
Christopher A Miller ◽  
Amy Abdalla ◽  
Nichole Helton ◽  
Nathan Salomonis ◽  
...  

Currently, it is not clear why some patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be "cured" with chemotherapy alone; are they living with small amounts of disease that is held in check by immunologic (or other) mechanisms, or is their disease really eradicated? The percentage of cytogenetically normal AML patients who have long (>5 years) first remissions (LFRs) after chemotherapy alone is low (about 9.1% in patients <60 years and 1.6% in >60 years1). For this reason, most intermediate risk patients are offered allogeneic transplantation to decrease their risk for relapse. To better understand mechanisms of chemotherapy sensitivity in AML, we performed an analysis of the mutation landscape and persistence, using samples from 8 normal karyotype LFR patients (without CEBPA mutations) who received standard "7+3" induction and high dose cytarabine consolidation as their only therapy. The mean age at diagnosis was 43.5 years, and the mean follow up in first remission is 7.6 years; none of these patients has relapsed to date. For each case, we performed enhanced exome sequencing at diagnosis (235x coverage of the entire exome, and ~1008x coverage of recurrently mutated AML genes). Each case had at least one documented AML driver mutation, with a median of 29 somatic mutations in the exome space. We created probes for 225 mutations (mean 28 per case), and performed error-corrected sequencing (Haloplex) for all available remission samples. The mean depth of Haloplex coverage was 1607x, and each sample had at least one AML-specific mutation assayed, with a sensitivity of 1 cell in 1,750 (0.06%). 7/8 patients demonstrated complete clearance of all mutations in all remission samples tested, which was confirmed with digital droplet PCR for 5 cases, with a sensitivity of detection of 1 cell in 100,000. In one case, we detected a persistent ancestral clone harboring DNMT3AR882H, which can be associated with long first remissions for some patients2. Strikingly, the founding clone in all 8 cases had one or more somatic mutations in genes known to drive cell proliferation (e.g. MYC, FLT3, NRAS, PTPN11, Figure 1 top panel). These are usually subclonal mutations that occur late during leukemic progression, suggesting that the presence of a "proliferative hit" in the founding clone might be important for chemotherapy clearance of all the AML cells in a given patient. To support this hypothesis, we analyzed the mutational clearance of 82 AML cases with paired diagnosis and day 30 post-chemotherapy bone marrow samples. We observed that, whether present in the founding clone or in subclones, mutations in MYC, CEBPA, FLT3, NRAS, and PTPN11 cleared after induction chemotherapy in all samples, while other mutations were often persistent at day 30 (e.g. DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, NPM1, TET2; Figure 1 bottom panel). Compared to other published sequencing studies of AML, MYC and NRAS mutations were significantly enriched in this small cohort (MYC p= 0.002, and NRAS p= 0.034), with MYC enrichment being particularly striking (37.5% versus 1.8%). All MYC mutations were canonical single base substitutions occurring in the highly conserved MYC Box 2 domain at the N-terminus of MYC (p.P74Q or p.T73N). Overexpression of MYCP74Q in murine hematopoietic progenitors prolonged MYC half life (89 min vs. 44 min for wild type), and enhanced cytarabine sensitivity at all concentrations tested (range 10-1000 nM, p=0.0003), both in vitro and in a MYC-driven leukemia model in vivo. MYC expression measured with flow cytometry in the blasts of the LFR samples was significantly higher (p=0.045) compared to unfavorable risk (complex karyotype) or other intermediate risk categories, but similar to good risk AML (biallelic CEBPA mutations, core binding factor fusion-associated AML, and AML with isolated NPMc), suggesting that activation of the MYC pathway may represent a shared feature of chemosensitive patients. Taken together, these data suggest that some intermediate patients who are effectively "cured" with chemotherapy alone may not have persistent subclinical disease, nor retained ancestral clones that could potentially contribute to relapse. Importantly, these patients often have mutations driving cell proliferation in the founding clone, indicating that the presence of specific mutations in all malignant cells may be critical for complete AML cell clearance with chemotherapy. 1. Blood Adv. 2018 Jul 10; 2(13): 1645-1650 2. N Engl J Med 2018; 378:1189-1199 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2001 ◽  
Vol 183 (17) ◽  
pp. 4985-4993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minetaka Sugiyama ◽  
Jun-Ichi Nikawa

ABSTRACT In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, IRE1 encodes a bifunctional protein with transmembrane kinase and endoribonuclease activities. HAC1 encodes a transcription factor which has a basic leucine zipper domain. Both gene products play a crucial role in the unfolded protein response. Mutants in which one of these genes is defective also show the inositol-auxotrophic (Ino−) phenotype, but the reason for this has not been clear. To investigate the mechanism underlying the Ino−phenotype, we screened a multicopy suppressor gene which can suppress the Ino− phenotype of the Δhac1 strain. We obtained a truncated form of the ITC1 gene that has a defect in its 3′ region. Although the truncated form ofITC1 clearly suppressed the Ino− phenotype of the Δhac1 strain, the full-lengthITC1 had a moderate effect. The gene products ofITC1 and ISW2 are known to constitute a chromatin-remodeling complex (T. Tsukiyama, J. Palmer, C. C. Landel, J. Shiloach, and C. Wu, Genes Dev. 13:686–697, 1999). Surprisingly, the deletion of either ITC1 orISW2 in the Δhac1 strain circumvented the inositol requirement and caused derepression of INO1even under repression conditions, i.e., in inositol-containing medium. These data indicate that the Isw2p-Itc1p complex usually repressesINO1 expression and that overexpression of the truncated form of ITC1 functions in a dominant negative manner inINO1 repression. It is conceivable that the repressor function of this complex is regulated by the C-terminal region of Itc1p.


Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 881-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Andrews ◽  
D. Garcia-Estefania ◽  
I. Delon ◽  
J. Lu ◽  
M. Mevel-Ninio ◽  
...  

OVO controls germline and epidermis differentiation in flies and mice. In the Drosophila germline, alternative OVO-B and OVO-A isoforms have a common DNA-binding domain, but different N-termini. We show that these isoforms are transcription factors with opposite regulatory activities. Using yeast one-hybrid assays, we identified a strong activation domain within a common region and a counteracting repression domain within the OVO-A-specific region. In flies, OVO-B positively regulated the ovarian tumor promoter, while OVO-A was a negative regulator of the ovarian tumor and ovo promoters. OVO-B isoforms supplied ovo(+) function in the female germline and epidermis, while OVO-A isoforms had dominant-negative activity in both tissues. Moreover, elevated expression of OVO-A resulted in maternal-effect lethality while the absence of OVO-A resulted in maternal-effect sterility. Our data indicate that tight regulation of antagonistic OVO-B and OVO-A isoforms is critical for germline formation and differentiation.


2000 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. A350
Author(s):  
Toshifumi Ashida ◽  
Fumika Orii ◽  
Atsuo Maemoto ◽  
Tokiyoshi Ayabe ◽  
Takanori Fujiki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document