Absence of Prognostic Impact Associated with the Use of Statins in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era: An Exploratory Analysis From the PRIMA Study.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2649-2649
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Bachy ◽  
John F. Seymour ◽  
Pierre Feugier ◽  
Fritz Offner ◽  
Dolores Caballero ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2649 Background. Conflicting results have been published to date concerning the impact of statin use on the prognosis of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) treated with a rituximab-containing first-line regimen. By impairing protein prenylation and possibly lipid-raft formation, statins have been shown to exert an antitumoral activity both on solid and hematological malignancies in vitro as well as in animal models. However, in vitro experiments have demonstrated an unexpected impairment of anti-CD20 antibody binding due to changes in conformational epitopes of the molecule. As a result, statins were found to decrease anti-CD20 induced complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Several groups worldwide attempted to assess the outcome of patients on statins receiving rituximab for NHL. No detrimental effect was observed across studies for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated upfront with R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimen but a surprising prolonged event-free survival (EFS) was observed for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) in one study. However, several caveats of the study precluded definitive conclusions to be drawn such as treatment heterogeneity, the enrollment of patients who did not receive rituximab, the retrospective assessment of statin use through medical charts and the consideration of EFS as the primary endpoint without specific evaluation of overall survival (OS). The impact of statin use on the prognosis of patients with FL therefore requires further investigation. Patients and methods. The randomized, open-label PRIMA study enrolled 1217 patients with de novo FL from 223 centers in 25 countries. Patients achieving at least a partial response following frontline therapy with R-CHOP, R-CVP or R-FCM were randomized between 2-years rituximab maintenance (every 8 weeks) or observation. A significant improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the rituximab maintenance arm (HR=0.55, 95% CI=0.44–0.68, p<0.0001). All concomitant treatments at enrollment, including the use of statins, were prospectively collected. 1140 patients with complete medication data available at registration were included in this analysis. Among them, 10.4% (n=119) were on statins. Baseline demographic characteristics between patients on statins and those not on statins were compared with the use of a Chi-square test. Various endpoints such as EFS, PFS, OS, time-to-next lymphoma treatment (TTNLT) and time-to-next chemotherapy (TTNCT) were examined in univariate and multivariate analysis. All time-to-event durations were calculated from the date of randomization (6 months after the start of induction therapy). Results. As expected, the use of statins was associated to an older age at registration (P<0.001) and, as a consequence, to a higher FLIPI risk score (P<0.001). Male sex was also overrepresented among statins users, although not significant (P=0.07). Unexpectedly, LDH was more frequently above the upper normal limit (P=0.03). No other difference was observed with regards to demographic data according to statin use. No difference in overall response rate to induction regimen as well as in the quality of the response (CR/Cru versus PR versus others) was noted (P=0.53). No further difference was found at the end of the maintenance period either for patients in the observation or in the rituximab treatment arm. Of note, no imbalance was detected concerning the rate of adverse events between the 2 groups of patients as a whole (grade 1–2 versus 3–4, P=0.18) or with regards to each particular toxicity. Finally, outcome in terms of EFS, PFS (see figure above), OS, TTNLT and TTNCT were similar regardless of the use of statins (P=0.76, P=0.43, P=0.21, P=0.83 and P=0.31 respectively). Importantly, further adjustment for potential confounding factors in multivariate Cox models such as age, FLIPI score or LDH (which were imbalanced between the 2 groups) did not reveal a potential beneficial effect. Conclusion. As for other subtypes of NHL, the use of statins in patients with FL in the rituximab era appeared safe and was not associated with an inferior outcome as suggested by in vitro experiments. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 412-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski ◽  
Matthew J. Maurer ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
William R. Macon ◽  
...  

Purpose Statins have antilymphoma properties but have also been shown to inhibit the binding of rituximab to the CD20 antigen, resulting in reduced antitumor activity of rituximab in vitro. The clinical impact of statin use on the outcome of lymphoma patients treated with a rituximab-containing regimen is unknown. Patients and Methods Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) were enrolled onto a registry and observed prospectively. The impact of statin use on patients' outcomes was analyzed. Results Two hundred twenty-eight patients with DLBCL and 293 patients with FL were enrolled from September 2002 through June 2007; 21% of patients with DLBCL and 19% of patients with FL were on statins at diagnosis, and 20% and 17% remained on statins during lymphoma treatment, respectively. All patients with DLBCL and 39% of patients with FL received initial therapy containing rituximab. The median follow-up time was 47 months (range, 13 to 80 months). Statin use had no impact on the overall response rate (P = .67), overall survival (P = .76), or event-free survival (EFS) in patients with DLBCL (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.68). Statin use at diagnosis was associated with improved EFS in patients with FL (HR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.77), including subgroups treated with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14 to 1.07) and patients who were observed only (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.84). Conclusion The concurrent use of statins during the treatment of patients with DLBCL and FL in the rituximab era did not adversely affect outcome. The apparent benefit of statin therapy on FL outcome requires further studies.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 839-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Trneny ◽  
Michael Rieger ◽  
Anders Osterborg ◽  
Ruth Pettengel ◽  
Darrell J White ◽  
...  

Abstract PMBCL is considered to be a distinct entity among diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The optimal therapy is still matter of debate and the impact of the addition of rituximab to conventional chemotherapy is unknown. The aim of this subgroup analysis of the MInT study was to evaluate the effect of rituximab in PMBCL in comparison to other DLBCL with mediastinal involvement (mDLBCL). Eligible for the MInT study (Lancet Oncol2006; 7: 379–91) were patients aged 18–60 years with DLBCL who had 0–1 risk factors according to age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI), stage II-IV disease, or stage I disease with bulk. Patients were randomly assigned to six cycles CHOP-like chemotherapy regimens with or without rituximab. Consolidating radiotherapy (30–40 Gy) was given to sites of primary bulky disease. Results: Of 824 patients enrolled, 87 had PMBCL and 139 mDLBCL according to nationally centralized hematopathologist review. 44 patients (51%) with PMBCL and 65 patients (47%) with mDLBCL were randomized to the rituximab arm. The subsets were balanced for IPI, but patients with PMBCL were younger (median age 35 vs 43 years); showed more frequently an elevated LDH (63% vs 33%), stage I/II disease (92% vs 65%) and bulky disease (85% vs 60%); and received more often mediastinal radiotherapy (69% vs 37%) compared with mDLBCL. Rituximab increased the rates of complete remission or complete remission unconfirmed (CR/CRu) in both subsets although this was statistically significant only for PMBCL (see Table). This was mainly due to the fact that in both subsets rituximab virtually eliminated progressive disease (PD) under primary treatment, whereas without rituximab, PD tended to be more frequent in PMBCL than in mDLBCL (24% vs 11%, p=0.09). With a median observation time of 37 months (range 0–59), estimated 3-year event-free-survival (EFS) was improved by rituximab for PMBCL (78% vs 52%, p=0.012), mDLBCL (74% vs 59%, p=0.130), and all other DLBCL (n=597, 80% vs 60%, p<0.0001). Rituximab also improved progression-free-survival (PFS) of PMBCL, but not of mDLBCL (Table). This could be explained in part by the favorable outcome of mDLBCL compared to PMBCL in the chemotherapy-only arm (3-year PFS 77% vs 64%, p=0.08). In both subsets, the overall survival (OS) benefit observed with rituximab did not reach statistical significance (Table). Multivariable cox regression models (adjusting for treatment arm; IPI; etoposide use (CHOEP21); bulky disease; histology (PBMCL vs mDLBCL); and the interactions between histology and treatment arm, and histology and IPI, respectively) identified rituximab as a strong prognostic factor and a trend to an interaction between histology and treatment arm for the outcome of a patient. Conclusion: In young patients with PMBCL, rituximab added to 6 cycles of CHOP-like chemotherapy increases response rate, EFS, and PFS to the same extent as in other DLBCL, thereby eliminating the outcome disadvantage of PMBCL observed with CHOP-like chemotherapy alone. PMBCL Rituximab CR/CRu PD 3y-EFS 3y-PFS 3y-OS No 54% (38%–70%) 24% (11%–38%) 52% (35%–66%) 64% (46%–77%) 78% (61%–88%) Yes 80% (68%–92%) 3% (0%–7%) 78% (61%–88%) 88% (70%–95%) 89% (71%–96%) P-value 0.03 0.006 0.012 0.006 0.16 mDLBCL Rituximab CR/Cru PD 3y-EFS 3y-PFS 3y-OS No 67% (55%–78%) 11% (3%–18%) 59% (46%–70%) 77% (64%–86%) 89% (79%–95%) Yes 81% (71%–91%) 2% (0%–5%) 74% (60%–83%) 81% (68%–89%) 92% (79%–97%) P-value 0.1 0.07 0.13 0.71 0.47


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 583-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski ◽  
Matthew J. Maurer ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
William R. Macon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Recent literature suggests that statins may have anticancer potential. This effect is thought to be mediated through 2 primary mechanisms - impairment of protein prenylation and interference with the formation of cholesterol-rich lipid microdomains, or “lipid rafts” within the cell membrane. Both of these processes are critical for signaling activity of numerous proteins important for lymphomagenesis and tumor survival. Recent data, however, suggest that statin use may directly inhibit rituximab binding to CD20 and therefore rituximab efficacy. These findings raised significant concerns about statin use during rituximab treatment. Here we report on statin use and clinical outcome in a cohort of FL and DLBCL treated patients, most of whom were treated with rituximab containing regimens. Methods: 293 newly diagnosed FL patients and 228 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients were prospectively enrolled in our Lymphoma SPORE registry from 9/2002 through 6/2007. Pathology was centrally reviewed. All patients were followed for retreatment, progression-free and overall survival. Statin use at the time of diagnosis and time of initial treatment was abstracted from the medical record. An event was defined by disease progression, retreatment, or death due to any cause. Results: 19% of FL patients and 22% of DLBCL patients were on statins at diagnosis; 16% and 19% were on statins during treatment, respectively. Initial therapy for the FL patients was observation (40%), R-CHOP (19%), R-CVP (12%), rituximab alone (8%), CVP (7%), RT (6%), and other (8%). All DLBCL patients received rituximab with CHOP or a CHOP-like regimen. At a median follow-up of 36 months (range 3–73), 109 (37%) and 65 (29%) of FL and DLBCL patients had an event; 19 (6%) and 46 (20%) of FL and DLBCL patients died, respectively. After adjusting for FLIPI, grade, and initial therapy type, statin use at diagnosis was associated with better event-free survival (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34–0.95, p=0.03) in FL patients. Statin use during treatment in FL patients was also associated with better event-free survival, though not statistically significant (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.39–1.16, p=0.15). The improvement in EFS for FL patients was consistent across initial therapies, including observation. Statin use was not associated with IPI-adjusted overall survival or event-free survival in DLBCL (all p &gt; 0.50). Conclusions: Statin therapy does not appear to be associated with inferior clinical outcome in DLBCL treated with rituximab and CHOP or CHOP-like therapy. Therefore direct inhibition of rituximab binding to CD20 may have limited clinical significance or/and may be overcome by inhibitory impact of statins on cell signaling. The latter possibility is supported by our observation that statin use is associated with improved event-free survival in follicular lymphoma. Figure Figure Figure Figure


Author(s):  
Sushanth Gouni ◽  
Mario L. Marques-Piubelli ◽  
Paolo Strati

The survival and proliferation of follicular lymphoma (FL) cells is strongly dependent on macrophages, their presence being necessary for the propagation of FL cells in vitro. To this regard, as shown also for the majority of solid tumors, a high tissue content of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), particularly if showing a pro-tumoral phenotype (also called M2) has strongly associated with a poor outcome among FL patients treated with chemotherapy. The introduction of rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody which can be used by TAMs to performed antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, has challenged this paradigm. In the rituximab-era, in fact, clinical studies have yielded conflicting results in FL, showing variable outcomes based on the type of employed regimen. This has highlighted for the first time that the impact of TAM on the prognosis of FL patients may depend on the administered treatment, emphasizing the need to better understand how currently available therapies affect macrophage function in FL. We summarize here the impact of approved and novel therapies for FL on the biology of TAMs, including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, lenalidomide, and targeted agents, and describe their effects on macrophage phagocytosis, polarization and function. While novel agents targeting the CD47/SIRPα axis are being developed and showing promising activity in FL, a deeper understanding of macrophage biology and their complex pathways will help to develop novel and safer therapeutic strategies for patients with this type of lymphoma.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1455-1455
Author(s):  
Linn Rønlev Reinholdt ◽  
Maria Bach Laursen ◽  
Steffen Falgreen ◽  
Alexander Schmitz ◽  
Julie Støve Bødker ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of B-cell-derived non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with a varying response and long-term outcome following therapy. The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has improved the survival outcome of DLBCL patients significantly. However, refractory and recurrent disease are major clinical problems due to drug-specific molecular resistance in this heterogeneous disease and patients with early relapse after rituximab-containing first-line therapy have a poor prognosis. Both antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity are considered to be involved in the rituximab-mediated depletion of B-cells; however, the precise mechanism of action for rituximab in the patients is not known, and little is known about determinants of rituximab resistance in the treatment of DLBCL. CXCR4 is a seven transmembrane domain receptor that is associated with heterodimeric G proteins. Since the apoptotic effect of rituximab is enhanced using an antagonist against CXCR4 in Burkitt lymphoma (1) we speculate that similar mechanisms may exist in DLBCL. Thus, if CXCR4 is a central player in determining the resistance of DLBCL cells to rituximab induced complement-dependent cytotoxicity the expression level of CXCR4 therefore also impacts the prognosis of DLBCL patients. Methods: In a two-step strategy, we have challenged this hypothesis; first, by clinical data analysis of the prognostic impact of CXCR4 gene expression in clinical DLBCL datasets and, secondly, by laboratory analysis in a preclinical model of 14 DLBCL cell lines, studying, in vitro, the effect of CXCR4 in rituximab-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Results: Our results document that the normal expression pattern of centroblasts having higher CXCR4 membrane expression levels than centrocytes, is maintained in the malignant condition of DLBCL when individual patient samples at time of diagnosis are associated to normal B-cell subset phenotypes using the expression based "B-cell associated gene signature" (BAGS) classification system (2). The prognostic impact of CXCR4 gene expression is significant in R-CHOP but not in CHOP treated patients and independent of both the international prognostic index (IPI) scoring system as well as the (BAGS)-defined classification. Experimental in vitro studies of rituximab-induced complement-dependent cytotoxicity in systematic dose response screens of 14 CD20+ DLBCL cell lines using growth inhibition as out-read parameter resulted in very heterogeneous responses ranging from fully resistance to hypersensitivity. An inverse correlation between rituximab sensitivity and the level of gene- as well as membrane-located CXCR4 expression was documented, but exclusively in sensitive cell lines. In addition, rituximab induced membrane-located CXCR4 expression in a complement-independent manner in DLBCL cell lines. Combining rituximab and the CXCR4-antagonist plerixafor increased the cytotoxic effect of rituximab in cell lines supporting that CXCR4 has negative impact on the function of rituximab. Conclusion: This study supports that CXCR4 expression is a pathogenic variable, reflecting the reminiscent state of normal B-cell differentiation of the malignant DLBCL cells. In addition, CXCR4 provides additional and independent prognostic information in DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP, and plays a role in rituximab-mediated CDC sensitivity in DLBCL cell lines. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8033-8033 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Kaminski ◽  
J. Estes ◽  
M. Tuck ◽  
C. W. Ross ◽  
R. L. Wahl

8033 Background: Monoclonal antibody-based therapies are improving the outcome for patients (pts) with follicular lymphoma (FL). Radioimmunotherapy has been found to be effective for pts with relapsed/refractory disease, but even more so when used as frontline treatment. Methods and Results. We previously reported the results of a phase II, single-institution, study of anti-CD20 I-131- Tositumomab (Bexxar) given as a single agent and as a single one-week treatment for 76 pts with Stage 3 or 4 FL (NEJM 352:441, 2005). An overall response (OR) rate and complete remission (CR) rate of 95% and 75%, respectively, were observed. With a median follow-up of 5.1 yrs, 5-yr overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 89% and 59%, respectively, with a median PFS reached at 6.1 yrs. We now report on this pt cohort after a median follow-up of 7.93 yrs. The 8-year and 10-yr OS is estimated (by KM) now at 86% and 8-yr PFS is 50% (95% CI: 38.8 - 61.7%). Only 3 additional relapses have occurred in the additional follow-up period (at 8.0, 8.3, and 9.2 years) in those with CRs. The 8-yr PFS for the 57 pts who achieved CR is now 64%. The median for PFS has now being reached for CRs at 9.2 yrs. When the impact of baseline FLIPI scores were analyzed, only 8-yr OS was significantly affected when low-risk (LR) and intermediate-risk (IR) categories were combined and compared to the high-risk (HR) category (92% vs. 75%; p = 0.029). The 8-yr PFS for LR + IR pts was 56% vs. 35% for HR pts (p = 0.317). 27 of the 76 total pts (35%) had HR scores. Of additional importance, no cases of MDS or AML have yet been observed. Other longterm toxicities including thyroid status and second non-hematologic cancers will be updated at the meeting. Conclusions. These data underscore the high degree of effectiveness and durability of remissions achieved with a single, one-week course of frontline Bexxar and should serve as a benchmark for comparison to other studies using more prolonged and toxic treatments, including those combining unlabeled or radiolabeled antibodies with chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7569-TPS7569
Author(s):  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Michael Roost Clausen ◽  
Anna Sureda Balari ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Christopher Fox ◽  
...  

TPS7569 Background: Patients (pts) with DLBCL who are refractory to/or have relapsed (R/R) after treatment with chemotherapy and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) have a poor prognosis. There is a need for new treatment options to improve outcomes. Epcoritamab, a novel subcutaneous (SC) bispecific antibody, binds to CD3 on T-lymphocytes and CD20 on B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cells to induce potent and selective killing of malignant CD20+ B-cells. In an ongoing phase 1/2 dose-escalation trial in heavily pretreated pts with B-cell NHL (N = 68), epcoritamab demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and substantial single-agent anti-tumor activity, with a complete response (CR) rate of 55% and an overall response rate (ORR) of 91% in pts with R/R DLBCL (at ≥48 mg doses; n = 12) (NCT04663347; Hutchings, ASH, 2020). Furthermore, all 4 evaluable R/R DLBCL pts previously treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy achieved an objective response with 2 achieving CR. These encouraging data support the potential for epcoritamab to improve clinical outcomes in pts with R/R DLBCL. Here we describe the phase 3 trial of epcoritamab versus standard of care (SOC) treatments in pts with R/R DLBCL (NCT04628494). Methods: GCT3013-05 is a randomized, open-label, worldwide, multicenter, phase 3 study designed to evaluate the efficacy of epcoritamab versus investigator’s choice of SOC with R-GemOx (rituximab, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin) or BR (bendamustine, rituximab) in adults with R/R disease of one the following CD20+ B-cell NHL histologies: I) DLBCL, not otherwise specified including de novo DLBCL or DLBCL histologically transformed from follicular lymphoma; II) “double-hit” or “triple-hit” DLBCL (high-grade B-cell lymphoma, with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 translocations); or III) follicular lymphoma grade 3B. Other key eligibility criteria include: ≥1 line of prior chemotherapy that included treatment with an anti-CD20 mAb, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, and prior failure of/ineligibility for autologous stem cell transplantation. Prior CAR-T therapy is allowed. A total of 480 pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive either SC epcoritamab at the recommended phase 2 dose (28-day cycles; weekly, biweekly, or monthly schedule depending on cycle number) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity; or up to 4 cycles of biweekly treatment with intravenous (IV) R-GemOx (8 doses); or up to 6 cycles of IV BR (6 doses; dosing every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint is overall survival. Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, ORR, duration of response, time to response, and safety. The study is currently enrolling in Australia, Belgium, Denmark, France, Spain, and will open for enrollment in additional countries. Clinical trial information: NCT04628494.


Gerontology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Katharina Anic ◽  
Sophie Birkert ◽  
Mona Wanda Schmidt ◽  
Valerie Catherine Linz ◽  
Anne-Sophie Heimes ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> We evaluated the prognostic impact of various global health assessment tools in patients older than 60 years with ovarian cancer (OC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> G-8 geriatric screening tool (G-8 score), Lee Schonberg prognostic index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were determined retrospectively in a consecutive cohort of elderly patients with OC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier method were performed to analyze the impact of the preoperative global health status on survival. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 116 patients entered the study. In multivariate analysis adjusted for clinical-pathological factors, only the G-8 score retained significance as a prognostic parameter of progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.970; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.056–3.677]; <i>p</i> = 0.033). Fifty-six patients were classified as G-8-nonfrail with an increased PFS compared to 50 G-8-frail patients (53.4% vs. 16.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.010). A higher CCI was associated with decreased PFS (45.1% vs. 22.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.012), but it did not influence the risk of recurrences or death (<i>p</i> = 0.360; <i>p</i> = 0.111). The Lee Schonberg prognostic index, the ECOG, and age were not associated with survival. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The G-8 score independently predicted PFS in elderly OC patients regardless of maximal surgical effort. Thus, it could be useful to assess surgical treatment based on frailty rather than age alone.


2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanin Intragumtornchai ◽  
Udomsak Bunworasate ◽  
Noppadol Siritanaratkul ◽  
Archrob Khuhapinant ◽  
Weerasak Nawarawong ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Luis Alberto de Padua Covas Lage ◽  
Gisele Rodrigues Gouveia ◽  
Suzete Cleusa Ferreira ◽  
Sheila Aparecida Coelho de Siqueira ◽  
Abrahão Elias Hallack Neto ◽  
...  

Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent lymphoid malignancy, representing 30-40% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). They comprise a group of aggressive and heterogeneous neoplasms in terms of clinical presentation, response to therapy and prognosis. The OCT-1 gene is a member of the homodomain-POU family of transcriptional regulators of B-lymphoid differentiation. OCT-1 acts by controlling the expression of specific B-cell genes, such as BCL-2, a potent inhibitor of apoptosis that is essential for the differentiation of B-cells in the germinal center. These genes can be expressed in DLBCL, but the role of BCL-2 in its prognosis has been contradictory and the prognostic impact of the OCT-1 gene has not yet been tested in this lymphoma. Methods: In this observational, retrospective, single-center study, we investigated the prognostic impact of BCL-2 and OCT-1 gene expression in Brazilian patients with DLCBL treated with immunopolychemotherapy R-CHOP in a real-world context. The BCL-2 and OCT-1 genes were assessed in 78.5% (77/98) DLBCL patients, and the RNA for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was isolated from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. The values obtained for gene expression were transformed into categorical variables according to their medians (6.27 for BCL-2 and 24.5 for OCT-1). The association between clinical and laboratory variables and results of gene expression was verified by the Fischer test. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed using Cox's bivariate regression method and multivariate analysis using Cox multiple regression methodology. Results: The median age of the cohort was 54.5 years (15-84), 50% (49/98) were male, 49.4% (38/77) and 51.4% (40/77) showed expression of OCT-1 and BCL- 2 ≥ median, respectively. The clinical characteristics of the 98 Brazilian patients with DLBCL that comprised our cohort are summarized in Table 1. The overall response rate (ORR) in all patients was 68.4% (67/98), 65.3% (64/98) showed a complete response (CR), and 3.1% (3/98) showed partial response (PR), while 6.1% (6/98) were primary refractory. With a median follow-up of 3.77 years (95% CI: 3.2-4.1), the median overall survival (OS) was 5.43 years (95% CI: 2.2-NR) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.15 years (95% CI: 2.9-NR). The 5-year OS and PFS was 54.2% (42.2% -64.8%) and 52.0% (40.1-62.6%), respectively. In the univariate analysis OCT-1 ≥ median was associated with shortened OS (HR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.21-4.96, p = 0.013) and PFS (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.14-4.51, p = 0.019). Overexpression of BCL-2 was associated with worse PFS (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.02-3.95, p = 0.043). Subgroup analysis showed that OCT-1 overexpression predominated in elderly individuals (≥ 60 years) in a statistically significant mode (29/38 cases - 76.3%, p = 0.029). It was also observed that overexpression of OCT-1 was associated with worse OS in the high-risk adjusted International Prognostic Index (aIPI) subgroup (p = 0.048) - Figure 1, and worse PFS in patients ≥ 60 years old (p = 0.025) - Figure 2. In the multivariate analysis, overexpression of OCT-1 was associated with poor PFS (HR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.06-4.76, p = 0.035). Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrated that overexpression of the OCT-1 gene was an independent prognostic factor associated with adverse outcomes in Brazilian patients with DLCBL. We also show that in patients with unfavorable risk, such as the elderly and those with intermediate-high and high-risk IPI, overexpression of OCT-1 contributed to the identification of a very high-risk clinical-molecular subgroup, where the results with standard R-CHOP therapy are unsatisfactory, and they may benefit from intensified therapeutic strategies. Our results are preliminary and need to be validated in subsequent studies of prospective nature and with an expanded sample. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document