Characteristics and Outcome Of 66 Patients With Extramedullary Plasmacytomas (EMPs) Included In a Phase III Pethema/GEM Study Of Induction Therapy Prior Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) In Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3188-3188
Author(s):  
Laura Rosiñol ◽  
Raquel Jiménez-Segura ◽  
Ana Isabel Teruel ◽  
Javier De La Rubia ◽  
Maria Victoria Mateos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Extramedullary Disease ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Extramedullary Plasmacytomas

Abstract Introduction In April 2006, the Spanish Myeloma Group (PETHEMA/GEM) initiated a randomized phase III trial (GEM05menos65) comparing induction with thalidomide/dexamethasone (TD) vs. bortezomiv/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD) vs. VBMCP/VBAD/Bortezomib (VBMCP/VBAD/B) in patients 65 years-old or younger with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM followed by ASCT with MEL-200 and maintenance therapy with interferon vs, thalidomide alone or bortezomib/thalidomide. The results of the overall series has been previously published. However, the efficacy of novel agents in patients with extramedullary disease is not well stablished. Primary end points to describe the characteristics and outcome of patients with EMPs homogeneously treated in the GEM05menos65 trial. Patients and Methods TD consisted of thalidomide 200 mg daily (escalating doses in the first cycle) and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4 and 9-12 at 4-week intervals for 6 cycles. The VTD regimen was identical to TD plus i.v. bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1,4,8,11 of each cycle. Combination chemotherapy plus bortezomib consisted of 4 cycles of VBMCP/VBAD on an alternating basis followed by 2 cycles of i.v. bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 on days 1,4,8, and 11 every 3 weeks). The duration of the induction therapy was 24 weeks in all arms. From April 6, 2006 to August 5, 2009 the 390 planned patients entered the study. 66 patients (17%) had extramedullary plasmacytomas (median age: 54 years, M: 33, F: 33). The isotype was IgG: 41, IgA 11, Bence-Jones: 10, IgD:4; kappa:41, lambda: 25.The stage according to the ISS was I in 27 patients, II in 26 and III in 13 patients. The location of the EMPs was soft-tissue masses arising from lytic lesions in 60 patients, testicular mass with no contact with bone in 1 case and was not specified in 6 cases. Nine patients had multiple extraosseous plasmacytomas. 17 patients received induction therapy with VBMCP/VBAD/B, 23 with TD and 26 with VTD. Results Cytogenetic information was available in 51 out of the 66 cases with EMPs and 12 of them (23%) showed high-risk cytogenetics. There were no differences in the incidence of high-risk cytogenetics (t(4;14), t(14;16) and del 17p) in patients with and without EMPs (23% vs 21%). The incidence of t(4;14) in patients with and without EMP was 16% vs 23%, respectively. The incidence of del 17p was 10% and 6% in patients with and without EMPs.The IFE negative CR rate was significantly higher with VTD as compared to TD (42% vs 13%, p=0.02) while there was no significantly differences among VTD and VBMCP/VBAD/B (42% vs 29%, p=NS). Patients with EMP had a significantly higher rate of PD during induction therapy as compared to patients without EMPs (24% vs 11%, p=0.01). This higher rate of PD in patients with EMP was observed in the 3 induction arms (VBMCP/VBAD/B 24% vs 9%, TD 40% vs 19%, VTD 12% vs 6%). 43 patients received ASCT as part of the treatment design. On an intention to treat basis, the pos-ASCT CR rate was higher with VTD arm compared to TD (50% vs 22%, p=0.07) but not significantly different from VBMCP/VBAD/B (50% vs 41%, p=0.7). After a median follow-up of 46 months, there was no significant differences in PFS between patients with or without EMP (26.9 vs 39.9 months, p=0.47). Although the difference did not reach statistical significance, there was a trend towards a shorter PFS for patients with EMPs with high-risk cytogenetics (median 12.1 vs. 28.3 months, p=0.13). In patients with EMPS, the PFS was not reached in the VTD arm versus 26.9 months with VBMCP/VAB/B and 22.8 moths with TD. The OS was significantly shorter in patients with EMPs as compared to patients without EMPs (median 69.9 months vs not reached, p=0.02) Conclusion 1) In the present study the frequency of EMPs was 17%, 2) the incidence of high-risk cytogenetics in patients with EMPs was similar to that observed in patients with no extramedullary disease, 3) patients with EMPs had a higher rate of progressive disease irrespective of the induction arm as compared to patients without EMPs, being VTD the best treatment option, 4) finally, the OS was significantly shorter in patients with EMPs. Disclosures: Rosiñol: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. De La Rubia:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mateos:Jansen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Tomas:MedImmune: Research Funding. Gutiérrez:Jansen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. San Miguel:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lahuerta:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Blade:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Thalidomide/Dexamethasone (TD) Vs. Bortezomib(Velcade®)/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone (VTD) Vs. VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade® As Induction Regimens Prior Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Younger Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM): First Results of a Prospective Phase III PETHEMA/Gem Trial

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 654-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Rosinol ◽  
M. Teresa Cibeira ◽  
Joaquin Martinez ◽  
Maria Victoria Mateos ◽  
Ma José Terol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract The benefit of ASCT in MM is associated with the degree of tumour decrease with the initial induction chemotherapy. In April 2006, the Spanish Myeloma Group (PETHEMA/GEM) activated a randomized phase III trial comparing TD vs. VTD vs. VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade® in patients 65 years-old or younger with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM, followed by ASCT with MEL-200. The primary end points were response rate after induction and after ASCT and time to progression. TD consisted of thalidomide 200 mg daily (escalating doses in the first cycle) and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 and 9–12 at 4-week intervals for 6 cycles. The VTD regimen was identical to TD plus Velcade 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1,4,8,11 of each cycle. Combination chemotherapy plus Velcade® consisted of 4 cycles of VBMCP/VBAD on an alternating basis followed by 2 cycles of Velcade® (1.3 mg/m2 on days 1,4,8, and 11 every 3 weeks). The duration of the induction therapy was 24 weeks in all arms. Two-hundred and seventy-five out of the 390 planned patients have been included so far. As of February 15, 2008, 190 patients (median age: 57 yrs., M:96, F:94; IgG:107, IgA:50, light chain:25, others:9) entered the study. 32 (17%) patients had soft-tissue extramedullary plasmacytomas (EMP) and the stage according to the ISS classification was I in 38%, II in 41%, III in 20% and unknown in 1%. The prognostic factors, including cytogenetics, were similar in the 3 arms. The prognostic factors, including cytogenetics, were similar in the three arms. 173 patients (TD:61, VTD:54 and VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade:58) were already evaluable for response and toxicity to induction therapy. Efficacy and toxicity were assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. The ≥PR rate was 62%, 77% and 70% with TD, VTD and VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade®, respectively (p=NS). The IF negative CR rate was significantly higher with VTD (31%) and with VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade® (22%) compared to TD (6%) (p< 0.01). Progressive disease was significantly higher in patients with EMP (31% vs. 12%, p=0.01). This higher PD rate in patients with EMP was similar in the three arms. The incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) was 38%, 54% and 50% with TD, VTD, and VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade® respectively. The total number of AEs for TD, VTD and VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade® were 37, 36 and 44, respectively. 13% of patients receiving TD developed ≥ grade 3 thrombotic events while 16% of patients in the VTD arm had grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was required in 8 patients (TD: 1; VTD: 5, VBMCP/VBAD: 2). 5 patients died during the induction phase (TD:3, VTD:0, VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade:2). 72 patients were evaluable for response after ASCT. The post-ASCT CR rate were higher with VTD (50%) and with VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade® (39%) compared to the TD arm (26%), although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Our preliminary analysis shows that VTD and VBCMP/VBAD plus Velcade® result in a higher CR rate than TD both before and after ASCT and that the toxicity in the three arms is not significantly different. Longer follow-up is needed to establish whether or not this higher tumour reduction is translated into a significant better long-term outcome. Updated results will be presented at the meeting.

A Phase III PETHEMA/GEM Study of Induction Therapy Prior Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) In Multiple Myeloma: Superiority of VTD (Bortezomib/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone) Over TD and VBMCP/VBAD Plus Bortezomib

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 307-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Rosiñol ◽  
María Teresa Cibeira ◽  
Maria Victoria Mateos ◽  
Joaquin Martinez ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 307 Introduction: In April 2006, the Spanish Myeloma Group (PETHEMA/GEM) activated a randomized phase III trial comparing TD vs. VTD vs. VBMCP/VBAD/Bortezomib (VBMCP/VBAD/B) in patients 65 years-old or younger with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM followed by ASCT with MEL-200. Primary end points: response rate after induction and after ASCT and time to progression. Patients and Method: TD consisted of thalidomide 200 mg daily (escalating doses in the first cycle) and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 and 9–12 at 4-week intervals for 6 cycles. The VTD regimen was identical to TD plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1,4,8,11 of each cycle. Combination chemotherapy plus bortezomib consisted of 4 cycles of VBMCP/VBAD on an alternating basis followed by 2 cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 on days 1,4,8, and 11 every 3 weeks). The duration of the induction therapy was 24 weeks in all arms. From April 6, 2006 to August 5, 2009 the 390 planned patients entered the study. Four patients failed the eligibility criteria. 386 patients (median age: 56 yrs; M: 207, F: 179; IgG: 233, IgA: 85, light chain: 57, IgD: 9, Ig M: 2) were analyzed. The stage according to the ISS was I in 147 patients, II in 160, III in 75 and unknown in 4 and 66 patients (17%) had extramedullary soft-tissue plasmacytomas (EMP). Seventy out of the 330 patients (21%) with cytogenetic studies had high-risk cytogenetics (t(4;14), t(14;16), and/or 17p deletion). One-hundred and thirty patients were allocated to VTD, 127 to TD and 129 to VBMCP/VBAD/B. Prognostic factors, including cytogenetics, were similar in the 3 arms. Response, survival and toxicity were evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis. Responses reported by investigators were centrally reassessed. Result: The IFE negative CR rate was significantly higher with VTD (35%) compared to TD (14%) and VBMCP/VBAD/B (22%) (p=0.0001 and p=0.01, respectively). The progressive disease (PD) rate during induction was significantly lower with VTD than with TD (7% vs. 23%, p=0.001). In patiens with high-risk cytogenetics, the CR rate was significantly greater with VTD when compared with TD (35% vs. 0%, p=0.002) and with VBMCP/VBAD/B (35% vs. 22%, p=0.02). The CR rate to VTD in patients with 17p deletion was 58% while none of the patients with this cytogenetic abnormality responded to TD or to VBMVP/VBAD/B (p=0.03 and p=0.02, respectively). Of interest, the CR rate in patients with t(11;14) was significantly lower than in patients lacking this abnormality (11% vs. 27%, p=0.01). This low CR rate in patients with t(11;14) was similar in the 3 arms. In the overall series, PD was significantly higher in patients with EMP (24% vs. 11%, p=0.01) with a significantly higher PD rate for TD as compared to VTD (40% vs. 12%, p=0.02). The incidence of thrombotic events was 2%, 6% and 5% for VTD, TD and VBMCP/VBAD/B, respectively (p=NS). The frequency of grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy was 12% with VTD compared to 1% in both the TD and the VBMCP/VBAD/B arms (p= 0.0002). Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity en 16 patients (VTD:9, TD:4, VBMCP/VBAD/B:3). Nine patients died during the induction period (3 in each arm). On an intention to treat basis, the post-ASCT CR rate was higher in the VTD arm compared with TD (46% vs. 24%, p=0.004) and VBMCP/VBAD/B (46% vs. 38%, p=0.1). The estimated overall survival (OS) at 4 years was 76% with no significant differences among the 3 arms. After a median follow-up of 27 months, the progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached with VTD while it was 27 and 38 months with TD and VBMCP/VBAD/B, respectively (p=0.006). In the overall series, patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a significantly shorter OS (p=0.00007) and PFS (p=0.004). In addition, when compared with the good-risk group, patients with high-risk cytogenetics showed a trend towards a shorter PFS either after induction with VTD (median not reached vs. 17 months, p=0.05) and with TD (median 28 vs. 15 months, p=0.09). Conclusion: Induction with VTD resulted in a significantly higher CR rate in both the overall series and in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. The post-ASCT CR rate was also significantly higher with VTD than with TD and there was a trend when compared with VBMCP/VBAD/B. Finally, VTD resulted in a significantly longer PFS. However, longer follow-up is required to establish whether or not VTD will overcome the poor prognosis of patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Disclosures: Rosiñol: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Bortezomib and Thalidomide are not approve for first line in Spain. Cibeira:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mateos:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Oriol:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. García-Laraña:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. De La Rubia:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sureda:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Díaz-Mediavilla:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Alegre:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. San Miguel:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Blade:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Prognostic Importance of Duration of MDS Prior to Randomization Between Decitabine (DAC) Vs. Best Supportive Care (BSC) In Elderly IPSS Intermediate-2 and High Risk MDS Patients: Results of the 06011 EORTC-GMDSSG Phase III Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4024-4024
Author(s):  
Michael Lubbert ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
Aristoteles A.N. Giagounidis ◽  
Dominik Selleslag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Response Predictors ◽  
Long Duration

Abstract Abstract 4024 Background: The hypomethylating agents 5-azacytidine (Vidaza) and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (Decitabine, DAC) are active in different MDS subtypes. Compared to other response predictors to DAC, prior MDS duration has received only limited attention (1, 2), with conflicting results. Based on our finding that long duration of MDS prior to DAC treatment may be a novel factor linked to a better outcome (1), we now assess its value in the phase III trial 06011 (DAC versus BSC [3]). Immediate enrolment after diagnosis was allowed in that trial, median MDS duration prior to randomization thus only 3 months (mths). Methods: Comparison of progression-free (PFS), AML-free (AMLFS) and overall survival (OS) according to MDS duration >= vs. <3 mths in 233 patients (pts) with higher-risk MDS (median age 70 years) randomized to DAC (n=119) or BSC (n=114). Comparisons by long-rank test and multivariate analyses by Cox regression (Performance Status [PS], cytogenetics and IPSS high risk N/Y) were performed retrospectively: MDS duration had not yet been known as possible stratification factor at time of study initiation, and the trial thus not been powered to detect significant differences with regard to this discriminator. Results: A better prognosis of patients with MDS duration >=3 vs <3 mths was observed in DAC arm (B vs A) and BSC arm (D vs C). Conversely, DAC yielded better results than BSC in each MDS duration group: <3 mths (A vs C) and >=3 mths (B vs D). In both arms (n=233), Mult. indicated that MDS duration (>=3 vs <3 mths) adjusted for treatment, PS, cytogenetics and IPSS group was an independent prognostic factor regarding PFS (HR=0.75, 95%CI 0.58–0.99), AMLFS (HR=0.68, 95%CI 0.51–0.90), and OS (HR=0.75, 95%CI 0.56–0.99). The tests for interaction treatment × duration of MDS were not significant for 3 endpoints: PFS (p=0.38), AMLFS (p=0.90), OS (p=0.67). Conclusion: In intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS pts, long duration from MDS diagnosis to start of DAC or BSC appeared to be associated with a better outcome. This finding is in sharp contrast to the adverse prognostic impact of antecedent disease duration in patients who received intensive chemotherapy (4). It is supported by a similar analysis of pts with AML from MDS treated on the 00331 DAC phase II multicenter trial: those with longer MDS duration prior to DAC also had better outcome (5). Application of this discriminator in the evaluation also of other DAC schedules and MDS treatments therefore appears warranted. References: 1. Wijermans et al., Ann. Hematol. 84 (suppl. 1): 9–14, 2005 2. Kantarjian et al., Cancer 109:265-73, 2007 3. Wijermans et al., Blood 112 (suppl. 1): abs. 226, 2008 4. Estey et al., Blood 90:2969-77, 1997 5. Lübbert, Schmoor et al., abstract submitted, ASH 2010 Disclosures: Platzbecker: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Salih:Pfizer: Research Funding. Muus:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Early Versus Deferred Treatment With Combined Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR) Improves Event-Free Survival In Patients With High-Risk Binet Stage A Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia – First Results Of a Randomized German-French Cooperative Phase III Trial

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 524-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen D Schweighofer ◽  
Florence Cymbalista ◽  
Carolin Müller ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Raphael Porcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Binet Stage

Abstract Introduction Patients with asymptomatic early Rai or Binet stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) do not benefit from mono-chemotherapy. Therefore, clinical observation without treatment (watch&wait; W&W) has been the gold standard for the management of these patients. Chemoimmunotherapy with FCR improves the outcome of patients with advanced CLL, but its efficacy in early stage disease has not been investigated. Several clinical and biological variables identify those patients who have a high risk of an aggressive disease course and who might benefit from early interventions. Consequently, this trial was conducted to test the value of FCR treatment in patients with early stage, high-risk CLL. Methods This report represents the endpoint and safety analysis of a randomized German-French cooperative phase III trial comparing the efficacy of early versus deferred FCR therapy in treatment-naïve Binet stage A CLL patients with a high risk of disease progression. Risk assessment was performed using 4 prognostic markers: Lymphocyte doubling time <12 months, serum thymidine kinase >10 U/L, an unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IGHV) status, and presence of unfavorable cytogenetics (del11q, del17p, trisomy 12) by fluorescence-in-situ hybridization. Presence of at least 2 versus less than 2 of these factors defined “high-risk” versus “low-risk” CLL. High-risk CLL patients were further randomized to receive either 6 cycles FCR (HR-FCR) or to be followed by a W&W strategy (HR-W&W). Patients with low-risk CLL were observed only (LR-W&W). Results Between 2005 and 2010, a total of 824 patients was enrolled, 423 patients in 69 centers of the German CLL Study Group and 401 patients in 25 centers of the French Cooperative Group on CLL. The diagnosis of CLL needed to be established no longer than 12 months prior to enrollment and patients were required to present with previously untreated stage Binet A CLL at the time of inclusion. Overall, 800 patients (97.1%) were stratified, 201 of them categorized as high-risk CLL (25.1%). There was no significant difference between high-risk patients from the two study groups regarding common baseline characteristics (e.g., age, sex, comorbidity, immunophenotype) and the distribution of risk factors used for stratification. 100 out of 201 high-risk patients were randomized to receive FCR therapy (HR-FCR), while 101 patients were allocated to the HR-W&W arm. 18 out of 100 patients (18%) withdrew consent for FCR therapy before treatment was started. 71 (86.6%) of 82 treated patients completed ≥4 cycles. The most common of 228 CTC grade III/IV adverse events reported within 12 months after treatment initiation were hematotoxicity (73.2% of patients) and infections (19.5% of patients). Three patients (3.7%) developed fatal CTC grade V infections (2 septic bacteremias, 1 of them with pulmonary aspergillosis; 1 encephalitis). Out of 79 patients available for response assessment until month 12 after treatment start, 76 showed a complete or partial remission (ORR 96.2%), 2 patients had stable disease (2.5%) and 1 patient had progressed (1.3%). After a median follow up of 46 months (range 0-88 months), HR-FCR patients demonstrated a significantly improved event-free survival (EFS) compared to HR-W&W patients (median EFS not reached versus 24.5 months, respectively, P<0.0001, Fig. 1). Overall survival was not significantly different between HR-FCR and HR-W&W with 181 high-risk patients (90%) being alive at last follow up. Both, HR-FCR and HR-W&W patients exhibited a significant shorter event-free and overall survival than LR-W&W patients, demonstrating an efficient prognostic segregation of patients by the risk assessment used for this trial (analysis based on the German LR-W&W cohort only, complete German-French LR-W&W data will be presented at the meeting). Conclusion This is the first randomized phase III trial investigating the efficacy of FCR chemoimmunotherapy in early stage CLL. So far, the study has revealed two major results: 1. A combination of clinical and biological factors can be used to identify early stage CLL patients who experience a rapid disease progression with unfavorable outcome, 2. FCR chemoimmunotherapy substantially improves event-free survival in early stage high-risk CLL. Disclosures: Langerbeins: Roche: travel grants Other. Cazin:roche: meeting invitation Other, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: meeting invitation, meeting invitation Other, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fischer:Mundipharma: Travel grants, Travel grants Other; Roche: Travel grants Other. Stilgenbauer:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel grants Other; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Leblond:Roche : Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hallek:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Efficacy, Safety, and Confirmation of the Recommended Phase 2 Dose of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat in Patients with Intermediate or High-Risk Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 711-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Florian H Heidel ◽  
Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
Francesco Passamonti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Marrow Fibrosis

Abstract Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal neoplastic disease resulting in bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and debilitating constitutional symptoms. The Janus kinase (JAK) pathway is often dysregulated in MF, and agents targeting this pathway have demonstrated efficacy in this disease. Ruxolitinib (RUX), a potent JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated superiority in spleen volume reduction, symptom improvement, and survival compared with the control arm in the phase III COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II studies. Panobinostat (PAN), a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi), inhibits JAK signaling through disruption of the interaction of JAK2 with the protein chaperone heat shock protein 90. In phase I/II studies, PAN has shown splenomegaly reduction and improvement of bone marrow fibrosis. The combination of RUX and PAN demonstrated synergistic anti-MF activity in preclinical studies. These preliminary results led to the initiation of a phase Ib study evaluating the combination of RUX and PAN in patients (pts) with MF. The updated results from the expansion phase of this trial are presented here. Methods: Eligible pts had intermediate-1, -2, or high-risk primary MF, post-polycythemia vera MF, or post-essential thrombocythemia MF by International Prognostic Scoring System criteria, with palpable splenomegaly (≥ 5 cm below the costal margin). The primary objective was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RPIID). Secondary objectives included safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints included assessment of improvement in bone marrow fibrosis and reduction of JAK2 V617F allele burden. The treatment schedule was RUX (5-15 mg) twice daily (bid) every day and PAN (10-25 mg) once daily 3 times per week (tiw; days 2, 4, and 6) every other week (qow) in a 28-day cycle. Following dose escalation and identification of the potential RPIID, additional pts were enrolled into the expansion phase and treated at this dose. Results: As of March 14, 2014, a total of 61 pts were enrolled (38 escalation phase and 23 expansion phase). The median duration of exposure to PAN and to RUX was 24.6 weeks and 24.0 weeks, respectively, for pts treated in the expansion phase. Three DLTs were observed in the escalation phase (grade 4 thrombocytopenia [n = 2], grade 3 nausea [n = 1]). No MTD was reached. The RPIID was confirmed to be RUX 15 mg bid and PAN 25 mg tiw qow in May 2014. Among the 34 pts treated at the RPIID, grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality included anemia (32%), thrombocytopenia (24%), diarrhea (12%), asthenia (9%), and fatigue (9%). AEs led to discontinuation in 6% of pts treated at the RPIID. Two pts treated at the RPIID died due to causes unrelated to study treatment (1 due to myocardial infarction and 1 due to progression of myelofibrosis). Among the pts treated at the RPIID, 79% showed a >50% decrease in palpable spleen length, with 100% decrease (non-palpable spleen) being observed in 53% of pts. Additionally, 48% of pts treated at the RPIID in the expansion phase achieved ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (Figure). These results are similar to those observed for spleen volume response at 24 weeks among pts who received single-agent RUX on the phase III COMFORT-I (41.9%) and COMFORT-II (32%) studies. Conclusions: The combination of the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor RUX and the pan-DACi PAN was well tolerated and resulted in high rates of reductions in splenomegaly in pts with intermediate- and high-risk MF. Although a relatively larger proportion of patients experienced spleen volume reductions at week 24 as compared to the COMFORT studies, the smaller sample size, shorter follow up times and potential differences in the patient populations preclude definitive comparisons. Similar to COMFORT-I and II trials, hematological AEs, specifically anemia and thrombocytopenia, were the most common AEs observed in pts treated with the combination therapy. Pts continue to be treated in the expansion phase at the RPIID. Updated safety, efficacy, and exploratory analyses on bone marrow fibrosis, JAK V617F allele burden, and biomarkers, including cytokines, will be presented. Figure Change in Spleen Volume in Expansion Phase Figure. Change in Spleen Volume in Expansion Phase Disclosures Kiladjian: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding. Heidel:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ribrag:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Epizyme: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Conneally:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kindler:Novartis: Consultancy. Acharyya:Novartis: Employment. Gopalakrishna:Novartis: Employment. Ide:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Loechner:Novartis: Employment. Mu:Novartis: Employment. Harrison:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; SBio: Consultancy; Shire: Speakers Bureau.

Analysis of Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated in Randomized Clinical Trials

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4000-4000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffi Tchekmedyian ◽  
Paul Elson ◽  
Aaron T. Gerds ◽  
Navneet Majhail ◽  
Hetty E. Carraway ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Past ◽  
American Society ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Introduction The major reasons for failure to achieve cure in the majority of AML patients (pts) are primary refractoriness of disease to initial chemotherapy or failure to maintain complete remission (CR) that has been achieved (relapse). There is no uniformly accepted standard treatment for relapsed or refractory (RR) AML, with most available therapies regarded as palliative or as a bridge to allogeneic transplantation. While the past two decades have witnessed trials of several investigational therapies in RR AML, data regarding the effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear. We studied the impact of experimental drugs in RR AML pts by undertaking a comprehensive analysis of all phase 2 and 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reported in the past 3 decades. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register electronic databases, ClinicalTrials.gov and conference abstracts from the American Society of Hematology (ASH), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Hematology Association (EHA) websites covering a period from 1988 to 2015. Key words used during this search included "refractory" or "relapsed" or "AML" or "phase II" or "phase III" or "randomized". Only double-arm, phase II with a sample size of at least 50 pts and phase III RCTs conducted in RR AML pts were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study methods, participants, therapies, and outcomes from all eligible trials: differences in how to classify agents in RCTs were resolved by discussion. The primary outcomes examined in the experimental arms (EAs) and standard arms (SAs) included CR rates, disease-free survival (DFS), refractory disease rates, treatment-related mortality (TRM) rates and overall survival (OS). Odds ratios (OR) were used to summarize differences between EAs and SAs. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to compare them and to assess the overall impact of time. Results Of 5500 included pts, 40.5% were treated on 21 double-arm, phase II trials, 51% on 10 phase III trials and 6.6% analyzed through 4 retrospective studies. There was no change in CR rates in either EAs (p=.21) or SAs (p=.15) over time (Figure 1). The CR rates in EAs tended to be higher than in SAs [OR=1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.50, p=.03). Rates of disease refractoriness to salvage regimens in both EAs (p=.70) and CAs (p=.31) did not change over time and these rates were not significantly different between treatment arms [OR=0.82; 95% CI, 0.62-1.08, p=.16]. TRM rates tended to decrease over time but the change was not significant in either group [p=.24 for SAs and p=.33 for EAs]. TRM rates were higher in SAs compared to CAs but did not reach statistical significance [OR=1.21; 95% CI, 0.97-1.50, p=.09]. Over time, there was no significant change inDFS in either group (p=.32 for CAs and p=.58 for EAs). DFS rates did not differ between EAs and SAs [OR=1.01; 95% CI, 0.86-1.19, p=.89] (Figure 2). OS tended to remain stable over time in both groups [p=.85 for SAs and p=.66 for EAs]. While OS tended to be higher in SAs, it did not reach statistical significance [OR=0.93; 95% CI, 0.83-1.05, p=.27]. Conclusions: These findings indicate a lack of significant or clinically meaningful improvement in disease outcomes, including OS, in RR AML pts treated within RCTs over the past 3 decades. Greater efforts need to be directed towards designing RCTs using novel statistical approaches and directed agents based on recent discoveries of targetable mutations. Disclosures Carraway: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Advani:Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blinatumomab: Research Funding. Sekeres:Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mukherjee:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Overall Survival and Subgroup Analysis from a Randomized Phase III Study of Intravenous Rigosertib Versus Best Supportive Care (BSC) in Patients (pts) with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (HR-MDS) after Failure of Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 163-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Aref Al-Kali ◽  
Maria R. Baer ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background: No approved treatment options are available to HR-MDS pts after HMA therapy. Study 04-21 (“ONTIME” trial) was a Phase III, randomized, controlled study of the efficacy and safety of rigosertib, a novel small molecule inhibitor of PI3-kinase and PLK pathways, in a heterogeneous population of MDS pts who had relapsed after, failed to respond to, or progressed during administration of HMAs. The study was conducted at 87 sites in the United States and 5 European countries. Methods:From Dec 2010 to Aug 2013, 299 HR-MDS pts [<30% bone marrow blasts (BMBL)] who had progressed on (37% of total enrollment), failed to respond to (25%), or relapsed after (38%) HMA treatment were stratified on BMBL count and randomized 2:1 to receive rigosertib (199 pts) or BSC (100 pts). Rigosertib was administered at 1800 mg/24 hr for 72-hr as a continuous intravenous (CIV) ambulatory infusion, every 2 weeks for the first 16 weeks, and then every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), analyzed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis using the Kaplan-Meier method stratified on BMBL (5% to 19% vs. 20% to 30%). The trial had a 95% power to detect a 13-wk increase in median OS from 17 wks on BSC, with a 2-sided alpha = 0.05. The following results are based on 242 deaths: 161 in the rigosertib arm and 81 in the BSC arm. Results : Overall, the 2 arms were balanced in terms of baseline characteristics, with the majority of pts being male (66%), and White (82%). Age ranged from 50-90 yrs in the rigosertib arm and 55-86 years in the BSC arm (median, 74 yrs). The majority of pts (85%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1. The median duration of the last HMA therapy was 8.8 months (mo) in the rigosertib arm and 10.3 mo in the BSC arm; 127 (64%) of rigosertib pts and 57% of BSC pts were classified as “primary HMA failure” (ie, they failed to respond to or progressed during HMA therapy, as defined by Prebet et al, J Clin Oncol, 2011). A 2.3-mo improvement in median OS was found in the overall (ITT) population (8.2 mo rigosertib vs. 5.9 mo BSC) (Figure 1). The ITT survival for rigosertib was similar to that noted in Phase I/II studies (35 weeks). The stratified log-rank p-value was 0.33. The stratified hazard ratio was 0.87, which was quite different from the ratio of medians (5.9/8.2 = 0.72), due to the fact that the 2 survival curves converged at 15 mo. Notably, among the 184 patients with primary HMA failure, the median OS was 8.6 mo in the rigosertib arm (N = 127) vs. 5.3 mo in the BSC arm (N = 57), HR= 0.69, p= 0.040 (Figure 2). Multivariate Cox regression, adjusting for pretreatment prognostic factors, showed little change in the treatment effect. The following subgroups were correlated with better OS: pts with failure of/progression on HMA treatment, pts with duration of HMA treatment ≤ 9 mo, pts < 75 years of age, and pts with very high risk per IPSS-R (Figure 3). Rigosertib was well tolerated, with a median dose intensity of 92%. There were no significant compliance or operations issues related to ambulatory continuous infusion. Protocol-defined dose reductions were reported in 5% of pts, with 24% experiencing dose delays of >7 days, mostly due to unrelated adverse events (AEs). No obvious differences between rigosertib and BSC were found in the incidence of AEs (rigosertib, 99%; BSC, 85%) or of ≥ Grade 3 AEs (rigosertib, 79%; BSC, 68%). In the rigosertib arm, AEs reported by ≥ 20% of pts, irrespective of severity or causality, were nausea (35%), diarrhea (33%), constipation (31%), fatigue (30%), fever (27%), anemia (22%), and peripheral edema (21%). Rigosertib had low myelotoxicity, consistent with previous clinical experience. Conclusions:Although the primary endpoint in this Phase III study of rigosertib vs BSC in pts with HR-MDS did not reach statistical significance in the ITT population, encouraging rigosertib treatment-related improvement in OS was noted in several subgroups of MDS pts, including those with “primary HMA failure and in patients in the IPSS-R Very High Risk category. CIV therapy with rigosertib had a favorable safety profile in this orphan population of elderly pts with MDS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures Fenaux: Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roboz:Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Glaxo SmithKline: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Teva Oncology: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy. Wilhelm:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wilhelm:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Azarnia:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Maniar:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment.

scholarly journals Impact of Early Progression on Long Term Outcomes Among Myeloma Patients Receiving Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVD) Induction Therapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3302-3302
Author(s):  
Ajay K Nooka ◽  
Jonathan L Kaufman ◽  
Charise Gleason ◽  
Nisha Joseph ◽  
Craig C Hofmeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Risk Status ◽  
Early Progression

Abstract Background: The incorporation of modern day induction regimens, autotransplant and continuous maintenance has resulted in better long-term outcomes for myeloma patients. Experience and trials demonstrated that by prolonging 1st progression-free survival (PFS1) and pushing the relapse farther, we can gain the OS advantage (McCarthy et al NEJM 2012). Unfortunately, a subgroup of patients fail to exploit this advantage, either due to their disease biology or due to inadequate therapy and suffer early progression (inferior PFS1) that impacts their long term outcomes. First, we evaluated the predictors of early progression to highlight the modifiable factors that can prevent progression. Next, we quantified the impact of shorter PFS1 (<36 months) on the long-term survival (OS). Methods: Of the 1000 consecutive newly diagnosed myeloma patients treated with homogenous induction therapy (RVD) induction therapy per Richardson et al (Blood 2010) from July 2005 until August 2016, 230 patients progressed within the first 36 months while 96 patients progressed beyond the 36-month mark, at the time of analysis. Median follow up duration was 38 months. Demographic and outcomes data for the pts were collected from myeloma database and responses were evaluated per IMWG Uniform Response Criteria. Results: Median age of the pts is 60 years (range 29-78). 29% of the patients are above the age of 66. M/F 54%/46%; W/AA 60%/32%; ISS III 27% were other patient characteristics. Cytogenetic abnormalities of significance: t(11;14): 13.5%, t(4;14): 7.8%, t(14;16): 5% del 17p: 16%, complex cytogenetics: 29% and high-risk status was conferred to 44% of the patients. 83% of patients underwent an autotransplant and median time to transplant was 6 (2-50) months. 68% of patients received maintenance therapy. Response rates are summarized in Fig 1. The median PFS for early and non-early progressors were 32 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 30.293-33.707) and 101 months (95% CI, 77.14-124.86) months, respectively (P<0.001). The median overall survival (OS) for early progressors was 94 months, and non-early progressors was not reached. (Fig 2). Among the predictors of early relapse, presence of high-risk status, ISS stage 3, inability to achieve ≥VGPR after transplant, non-receipt of transplant and/or maintenance were independent predictors of early progression on the multivariate analysis as illustrated in Table 1. Conclusions: Even with the effective use of the 3-drug induction regimen, these functionally high-risk patients that are early progressors have truncated long term survival. Our analysis advocates for using transplant, deepening the responses with modern drugs such as monoclonal antibodies to achieve ≥VGPR after transplant and intense maintenance strategies to prevent relapse. Disclosures Nooka: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive technologies: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaufman:Abbvie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Other: data monitoring committee; Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Hofmeister:Adaptive biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boise:AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy. Heffner:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Lonial:Amgen: Research Funding.

A Phase III Study of Enoxaparin Vs Aspirin as Thromboprophylaxis for Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients Treated with Lenalidomide-Based Regimen.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1092-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Cavallo ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
Izhar Harda ◽  
Barbara Lupo ◽  
Alessandra Romano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Abstract 1092 Background: Newly diagnosed myeloma (MM) patients who receive thalidomide-based regimens have a high risk of thromboembolic events. Preliminary studies on MM patients receiving a combination of lenalidomide (R) and dexamethasone have shown an increased incidence of thrombosis as well, with a calculated odds ratio of about 3.5 of developing thrombosis. Aims: In a prospective, multicenter phase III trial (RV-MM-PI-209) newly diagnosed patients were treated with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) induction and subsequently randomized to receive consolidation with lenalidomide + melphalan + prednisone (MPR) or high dose melphalan (MEL200). In this sub-study we evaluated the safety and the efficacy of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or low-dose aspirin (ASA) as anticoagulant prophylaxis during Rd induction and MPR consolidation. End-points were incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), acute cardiovascular events, sudden death, major and minor bleeding. Methods: 402 newly diagnosed MM patients were enrolled in the randomized trial RV-MM-PI-209. Treatment schedule included four 28 day cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg days 1–21) and low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg days 1,8,15,22) (Rd) as induction. As consolidation, patients were randomized to receive six 28-day cycles of melphalan (0.18 mg/kg days 1–4), prednisone (2 mg/kg days 1–4) and lenalidomide (10 mg days 1–21) (MPR, N=202) or tandem melphalan 200 mg/m2 with stem-cell support (MEL200, N=200). All eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive LMWH (Enoxaparin 40 mg/d, N=166) or ASA (Aspirin 100 mg/d, N=176) for the duration of the induction therapy and for consolidation therapy in the MPR group; 60 patients were excluded from this sub-study because of indication for anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy or high-risk of bleeding. Results: Patient characteristics and distribution of major risk factors were similar in the two groups. At the time of the present analysis 381 and 130 patients are evaluable during Rd induction and consolidation respectively. During the induction phase, the overall incidence of any grade 3–4 thrombotic events was 1% in the LMWH group, 2,4% in the ASA group (p=.45). VTE, mostly of the lower limbs were equally distributed in the two groups (1%; p not significant), while pulmonary embolism was observed only in the ASA group (2%; p not significant). Median time to onset of thrombotic events for patients who received LMWH or ASA were 2.1 and 1 months, respectively. No acute cardiovascular events were observed and only minor bleeding was detected in the LMWH group (1%). During consolidation no thrombotic events were observed in the MPR group, only one central venous catheter thrombosis was observed in the MEL200 group. Conclusion: The overall incidence of thrombotic events was less than 5% in all groups and confirmed the safety of low dose dexamethasone in association with Lenalidomide. No significant benefit was seen with LMWH over ASA in this patient population. LMWH and ASA are likely to be effective thromboprophylactic regimens in lenalidomide treated patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The analysis will be updated for the meeting. Disclosures: Cavallo: CELGENE: Honoraria. Guglielmelli:CELGENE: Honoraria; JANSSEN-CILAG: Honoraria. Boccadoro:CELGENE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; JANSSEN-CILAG: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Palumbo:CELGENE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JANSSEN-CILAG: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

High Dose Imatinib Induction Therapy (800 mg/day, 6 Months) In Pre-Treated Chronic Phase CML Patients Improves Cytogenetic and Molecular Responses but Does Not Improve Overall and Progression Free Survival – Final Results of the CELSG Phase III CML11 “ISTAHIT” Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2271-2271
Author(s):  
Andreas L Petzer ◽  
Dominic Fong ◽  
Thomas Lion ◽  
Irina Dyagil ◽  
Zvenyslava Masliak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2271 Introduction: Imatinib 400 mg/day represents the current standard treatment for de novo as well as pre-treated CML patients in chronic phase (CP). Recent randomized phase III trials revealed conflicting results concerning the potential higher efficacy of dose-increased imatinib in de novo treated CP-CML. Methods: We here present the final analyses including response data, OS, EFS and PFS of the multicenter, randomised, 2-arm phase III CELSG “ISTAHIT” trial evaluating imatinib high dose (HD) induction (800 mg/day, 6 months) followed by 400 mg/day as maintenance (experimental arm B) compared to continuous imatinib standard dose (400mg/day; arm A) in pre-treated CP CML patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0032726. Results: From a total of 243 patients screened for inclusion, 16 patients were not eligible (mainly due to non sufficient numbers of metaphases obtainable from the bone marrow before the start of the study). Of the remaining 227 patients, 113 patients were randomized into arm A and 114 patients into the experimental arm B. Subsequent data are presented as per protocol. No significant differences between treatment groups were observed regarding sex (55.5% female, 44.5% male), age (median: 46.3 years, range 18 –76), Sokal scores at diagnosis (30% low, 41% intermediate, 16% Sokal high risk, 13% unknown) and different pre-treatments, which included hydroxyurea (96%), interferon (72%), busulfan (17%) and “others” (26%; mainly Ara-C). The median observation time was 673 days. Cytogenetic responses were generally higher in the experimental arm B and revealed statistically significant differences in major cytogenetic responses (MCyR) at 3 and 6 months (month 3: 25.8% arm A, 48.3% arm B, p=0.002; month 6: 41.9% arm A, 58.8% arm B, p=0.029) as well as in complete cytogenetic responses (CCyR) not only during imatinib HD therapy (month 3: 7.5% arm A, 29.9% arm B, p<0.001; month 6: 20.4% arm A, 47.4% arm B, p<0.001) but also thereafter (month 12: 31.8% arm A, 52.9% arm B, p=0.006). The primary endpoint of the study, the achievement of an improved MCyR at 12 month was, however, not significantly different (56.8% arm A, 64.4% arm B). In line with improved cytogenetic responses, major molecular response (MMRIS) rates were also significantly better at 3, 6 and even at 24 months in the HD arm B (month 3: 3.7% arm A, 15.9% arm B, p=0.003; month 6: 9.4% arm A, 34.6% arm B, p<0.001; month 24: 26.5% arm A, 42.5% arm B, p=0.034). Surprisingly, however, this impressing improvement in cytogenetic and molecular remissions in patients achieving high dose imatinib as induction therapy did not translate into a better OS and PFS, both of which were comparable in the two treatment arms (OS: p=0.25; EFS: p=0.37). Moreover, the EFS was even significantly worsened in the experimental arm B (p=0.014). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities during the first 6 months of therapy were comparable, whereas grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were significantly more common in the imatinib HD arm B. Conclusions: Although high dose imatinib induction induces more rapid and higher cytogenetic and molecular remission rates in pre-treated CP CML patients, OS as well as PFS were not improved and EFS was even worsened in the high dose induction arm B. Therefore we conclude that imatinib 400mg/day remains the standard of care for pre-treated CP-CML patients. Disclosures: Petzer: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Imatinib 800mg is not licensed as the initial therapy of chronic phase CML. Lion: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bogdanovic: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Griskevicius: Novartis: Research Funding. Kwakkelstein: Celgene: Employment. Rancati: Novartis: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gastl: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wolf: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document