Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) In Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4801-4801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung Ha Kim ◽  
Seug Yun Yoon ◽  
Jina Yoon ◽  
Han Jo Kim ◽  
Se Hyung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Korean Study

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a critical complication of malignant disease. Pancreatic cancer is one of the cancers most commonly associated VTE. In general, the VTE incidence rate of Asians is lower than that of Caucasians. In 2007, a Korean study reported that only four cases of VTE (5.3%) occurred in Seventy five patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We evaluated VTE incidence in pancreatic cancer and characteristics of pancreatic cancer patients with VTE. (We found out that VTE incidence rate among Asians was not lower, and the event of VTE was poor prognosis.) Method We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with histopathologically proven pancreatic cancer from January 2006 to December 2012 at Soonchunhyang university hospital. We detected VTE through CT (chest CT, pulmonary embolism CT) and low extremity ultrasoundgraphy. Results Five hundred and fourteen patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled. (M: F, 300:214, localized: locally advanced: metastatic=31:230:253, mean age: 66.7 years). Ninety six of 514 patients (18.6%, symptomatic: aymptomatic=38:58, PE: DVT: PE+DVT: visceral thrombosis=20:19:19:38) were diagnosed as VTE. At the time of DVT diagnosis, cancer status of 50 patients cancer was progression, and that of 15 was stable. Thirty one patients were diagnosed with the pancreatic cancer and VTE, at the same time. They all had metastatic lesions. Fifty VTE patients were treated with antithrombotic therapy. Ninety three of 96 patients died, and three of them have probability that cause of death was VTE. The others died of pancreatic cancer progression. From pancreatic cancer diagnosis to VTE diagnosis, the period is 1.7month. (95%CI 1.1-2.3 month). Median overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between pancreatic cancer with VTE or without VTE. OS was significantly longer VTE patients after pancreatic cancer diagnosis than VTE patients with pancreatic cancer at the same time (10.73m vs. 1.7, p=0.00). Conclusion The incidence of VTE (18.6%) in Soonchunhyang university hospital with pancreatic cancer was not lower than that in western groups. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Early outcomes of irreversible electroporation after stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC): A matched pair analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 410-410
Author(s):  
Emanuel Boyer ◽  
Russell Palm ◽  
Jessica M. Frakes ◽  
Sarah E. Hoffe ◽  
Mokenge Peter Malafa
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Irreversible Electroporation ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Entire Cohort

410 Background: Outcomes remain poor for those diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic cancer. SBRT and IRE have independently demonstrated high rates of local control and minimal toxicity for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Data is limited regarding safety and efficacy in the sequential use of both therapies. Materials and Methods: A single institution retrospective matched cohort analysis was performed for patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with induction chemotherapy and SBRT followed by IRE, compared with patients of the same cohort who did not receive IRE. Patients were paired based on age, tumor stage, GTV D95, CA19-9 prior to SBRT, and chemotherapy type to mitigate selection bias in surgical candidates. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), freedom from local failure (FFLF) and freedom from distant failure (FFDF) were the primary outcomes compared via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank methods. Results: From July, 2014 to February, 2020 17 patients received SBRT followed by IRE. These patients were matched with 17 patients who received SBRT from January, 2012 to March, 2019. Most patients received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (82.4%) and were AJCC 8 stage III (79.4%). Median age of the overall cohort was 65.5 years and 50% were male. Median dose delivered to 95% of gross tumor volume was 32.61 Gy, and median pre SBRT CA19-9 value was 70.5 U/mL. There were no statistically significant differences in matched characteristics between the two cohorts. Among the SBRT+IRE, the median time between IRE and SBRT was 66 days (range:49-467 days). The median OS, PFS, FFLF, and FFDF for IRE+SBRT vs. SBRT alone from SBRT was 10.8 vs 15.1 months, 9.6 vs. 15.3 months, 15.7 vs. 15.3 months, 15.9 vs. 14.4 months respectively (all P > .10). 11 patients in the entire cohort experienced toxicity as a result of their radiation therapy (35%), with one G3 GIB and one patient experiencing G3 abdominal pain. Among the 17 patients who underwent IRE, nine patients experienced toxicity (53%). Most of these events were G3, with two G4 intestinal bleeds. There was zero mortality in the 90 day period post operatively. Conclusions: In a retrospective cohort,non-selective delivery ofIRE afterSBRT demonstrated no oncological benefit for patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared to only SBRT. Compared to historical experiences of IRE alone, there was no increase in overall toxicity with the combination of SBRT and IRE. The optimal timing, sequencing, and indications for IRE and SBRT in LAPC remain unknown and are best assessed prospectively. [Table: see text]

Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory C Wilson ◽  
Brent T Xia ◽  
Syed A Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Borderline Resectable

Despite decades of advancement and research into the multimodal care of pancreatic cancer, mortality after the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains grim. The role of adjuvant therapy following surgical resection has been well established in the literature. However, adjuvant therapy is imperfect, and outside of a clinical trial, there are high rates of omission or delayed initiation of therapy. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies continue to be explored in the management of resectable, borderline-resectable, and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. With improved resection rates and the possibility for tumor downstaging, neoadjuvant therapy has become standard for patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced unresectable tumors. Additional benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of resectable tumors include improved completion rates of systemic therapy and R0 resection rates. Future clinical trials, including the use of novel treatment agents and combination treatment strategies in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens, will add value to the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Key words: adjuvant therapy, borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, resectable disease 

Kras mutation as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16267-e16267
Author(s):  
Elena Serrano ◽  
Elizabeth Inga Saavedra ◽  
Maria Padilla Vico ◽  
Eduardo Perdomo ◽  
Maria Teresa Cano Osuna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Significant Difference

e16267 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in oncology patients. It has been reported that VTE increases morbidity and mortality in these patients. It’s prevalence in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) ranges around 4-7.5% Preclinic studies suggest that the mutation of the KRAS oncogene (KRASm) is associated with a higher risk of VTE among patients with colorectal cancer. KRASm appears to increase the expression of tissue factor, a physiological trigger of coagulation that is found on the surface of tumor cells. This association has not been studied in mPC, where this mutation can be found in 90% of the cases. Our aim is to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with VTE taking into consideration the status of KRAS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study within a cohort of patients with mPC that had a determination of the KRAS status. These patients were treated at Medical Oncology between January 2017 and December 2020. We performed a descriptive and survival analysis of our sample. We also studied the prevalence of VTE among the. Results: Our study cohort was 88 patients (pts), 63 (61, 2%) men and 40 (38, 8%) women. The median age was 63 years (32-84). 19 pts (18, 4%) were KRAS wild type (KRASwt), 69 pts (67%) KRASm. There was no statistically significant difference in gender, age, performance status, comorbidities, primary tumor/metastases location, disease control rate and toxicity between KRASwt and KRASm. Median serum levels of Ca 19.9 were higher in KRASm (39.847 U/ml vs 2026 U/ml). At the time of diagnosis, 78 pts (88, 6%) were metastatic and 10 pts (11, 4%) were localized/locally-advanced. Most of metastatic pts (62/78) were KRASm (p = 0, 015). Most common histology (86, 4%) was adenocarcinoma. This histology was more frequent in KRASm, 61, 8% (p = 0, 02). At time of analysis, 72 pts (69, 9%) were dead, most of them (54, 4%) were KRASm (p = 0, 001). 31 pts developed VTE: 4 were KRASwt and 27 KRASm. The prevalence of VTE was 36, 3%. It was greater in KRASm (39, 1%) than in KRASwt (26, 3%). There were 7 cases of rethrombosis instead of anticoagulant treatment (1 KRASwt and 6 KRASm). KRASwt seems to be a protective factor in the development of VTE (OR 0, 55; CI 95% 0, 18-1, 71). The most common entity were VTE of splenoportomensenteric axis (16 pts), followed by pulmonary embolism, EP, (7 pts), deep venous thrombosis, DVT, (4 pts) EP + DVP (3 pts), thrombosis associated with central venous catheter (3 pts) and other locations (2 pts). There were no differences in VTE location between KRASwt and KRASm. The median overall survival (OS) was 12, 82 months (CI 95%: 7, 87-17, 78). It was higher in KRASwt (26 months; CI 95%: 12, 21-40, 48) than in KRASm (9, 8 months; CI 95%: 6, 07-13, 65). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0, 001). Conclusions: In our cohort, the prevalence of VTE is higher than de prevalence described in the literature and was greater in KRASm population. OS was significantly larger in KRASwt.

Hypercoagulability Linked to Breast Cancer Depends On the Stage and the Duration of the Tumor Evolution

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3396-3396
Author(s):  
Mourad Chaari ◽  
Grigoris T Gerotziafas ◽  
Lilia Ghorbal ◽  
Vassiliki Galea ◽  
Ines Ayadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Thrombin Generation ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Normal Population ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic Event ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Hypercoagulable State ◽  
Tumor Evolution ◽  
Cancer Disease

Abstract Abstract 3396 Introduction The risk of venous thromboembolic event (VTE) in patients with cancer is particularly increased compared to normal population. It seems that this risk depends largely on the characteristics of the tumor, such as its site or its stage of evolution, and the anti-neoplasic treatment. The capacity of thrombin generation and D-dimers levels are two biological markers proposed for the stratification of the risk of VTE. We have analyzed thrombin generation and D-dimers levels in patients with breast cancer as markers of a hypercoagulable state, depending on the stage and the period of the tumor evolution. Materials and methods It is a prospective study carried out at the day hospital of the carcinology department of the University Hospital H. Bourguiba in Sfax-Tunisia, including patients with breast cancer at different stages of evolution and different period elapsed since cancer diagnosis. At the time of inclusion, a venous citrated blood sampling (3.2%) was made. The test of thrombin generation was carried out according to the technique of Calibrated Automated Thrombogram assay (CAT®, Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France). The parameters of the thrombogram were analyzed: endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), peak of thrombin (peak) and mean rate index (MRI). D-dimers were measured using the STA®- Liatest® D-Di assay (Diagnostica-Stago). Results Sixty one patients were included. Their average age is 51.8 ± 10.9 years old. Depending on the stage of cancer disease, 3 sub-groups of patients were distinguished: early local stage (T1, n=16), advanced local stage (T2-T4; n=25) and metastatic stage (M; n=20). Considering the time passed since diagnosis, we have different periods : inferior to 6 months (n=26), 6 to 12 months (n=7), 12 to 36 months (n=15) and more than 36 months (n=13). The analysis of the different parameters of the thrombogram depending on the cancer stage revealed that patients with an advanced local stage and a period elapsed since cancer diagnosis inferior to 6 months had significantly higher values of ETP and thrombin peak (1708±247 nM.min and 379±80 nM) compared to those with an older cancer (1404±308 nM.min, p<0.05 and 321±52, p<0.05 respectively). The study of D-dimers levels depending on the stage of cancer revealed an increase of this marker according to the severity of the cancer. Patients with metastatic stages have the highest levels (1937 ± 2468 μg/l) compared to patients with an early local stage (615±456 μg/l, p<0.05 ). In addition, the period of time since cancer diagnosis does not have any influence on D-dimers levels. Conclusion The evaluation of the capacity of thrombin generation and D-dimers levels showed that these biological parameters are indeed linked to the stage of evolution and the severity of breast cancer. Therefore, these biological tests underlying an hypercoagulable state have a potential and complementary importance to stratify the risk of VTE in this context. This should be confirmed by the prospective follow-up of the thromboembolic risk existing in the patients with breast cancer. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase II study evaluating trimodal therapy with cetuximab intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and gemcitabine for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer [ISRCTN56652283]

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4100-4100 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Krempien ◽  
M. W. Münter ◽  
C. Timke ◽  
P. E. Huber ◽  
H. Friess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Trimodal Therapy ◽  
Tumor Bleeding

4100 Background: The induction of EGFR targeting with cetuximab in radiation based therapy of solid tumors has yielded promising results. Thus, we initiated a prospective Phase II trial designed to analyze the feasibility and effectivity of trimodal therapy with gemcitabine-based chemoradiation and cetuximab in locally advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer. Methods: In this phase 2 study, pts with locally advanced pancreatic cancer without prior cytotoxic therapy were treated with radiotherapy (RT), gemcitabine weekly (300 mg/m2), and cetuximab weekly (loading dose 400 mg/m2 day 1, and concomitant with radiation day 8,15,22,29,36 250 mg/m2). RT was delivered by using an integrated IMRT boost concept (54 Gy GTV, 45 Gy CTV) over 5 weeks. RT was followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) weekly × 3 in 4 weeks. Response evaluation using computed tomography followed at week 12. All amenable patients were intended for surgical treatment between week 12–15. Results: 24 pts were enrolled until now. Preliminary results are presented on 20 pts with the following characteristics: pancreatic adenocarcinoma c2 T4 N1 20/20, median age = 63.5 (range 51–79); M/F = 13/7; ECOG PS 0/1/2 = 2/12/6; median days on treatment: 90 (range 70–100). Treatment-related toxicities were observed in 16 pts. Grade 3 toxicities included diarrhea (n = 4), fatigue (n = 2), nausea (n = 3), neutropenia (n = 6), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), and vomiting (n = 2). 18/20 pts developed some acneiforme rush during therapy. No omittance of cetuximab therapy was necessary. 1 patient died during RT due to tumor bleeding. Median follow-up at present is 6 month, median survival has not been reached. Partial remissions 8/20, stable disease 9/20, progressive disease 3/20. 12/20 patients were amenable for secondary potentially curative resection. 4 patients could be resected, while 3 patients were found to have abdominal metastatic spread. Conclusions: Early data from trimodal therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma with chemoradiation (IMRT), gemcitabine, and cetuximab indicate feasibility without increased toxicity profile. The local response appears to be very promising in pancreatic cancer, potentially allowing neoadjuvant treatment. [Table: see text]

Phase I trial of imexon, Inj. plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15058-15058
Author(s):  
S. J. Cohen ◽  
M. Zalupski ◽  
M. Modiano ◽  
P. Conkling ◽  
D. Mahadevan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Ecog Ps

15058 Background: Imexon for inj. (Amplimexon®, AMP) is an aziridine-containing iminopyrrolidone which causes G2 arrest, accumulation of reactive oxygen species, and induction of apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. AMP demonstrated synergy with gemcitabine (GEM) in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. This phase I study of AMP plus GEM was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics for both agents (PK) and tumor response. Methods: Patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma received one of two dosing regimens. The first 19 received 30 minute AMP IV days 1–5 and 15–19 followed by 30 minute GEM IV days 1, 8 and 15 Q4 wks (Regimen A). Dosing was modified after 19 pts to administer both AMP and GEM over 30 minutes days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (Regimen B). Dose levels (AMP/GEM, in mg/m2) for Regimen A: 200/800, 280/800, 200/1000, and 280/1000, and for Regimen B: 280/1000, 335/1000, 390/1000, 540/1000, and 750/1000. The current cohort is 1000/1000. Pts were assessed for response after cycles 2, 5 and 8. PK and pharmacodynamic (plasma thiol depletion) measurements were obtained during cycle one. Results: Forty-six pts have been treated to date, with 36 having complete toxicity data and evaluable. Pt characteristics: M/F (24/12), Age (mean 60.4 years, range 43–75), ECOG PS 0/1 (56%, 44%), metastatic/locally advanced (91%, 9%). The 36 pts have completed 122.5 cycles of therapy (median 2, range 0.5–12). Common toxicities: anemia (77%), fatigue (71%), nausea (60%), fever (54%), and leukopenia (54%). DLT were 1/6 at 280/1000 (Regimen A - febrile neutropenia), 1/6 at 280/1000 (Regimen B - gr 3 hypotension, gr 4 renal failure), and 1/9 at 390/1000 (gr 3 hyperbilirubinemia). Accrual continues at 1000/1000. Of 36 pts, 4 have had partial responses and 14 stable disease. PK and plasma thiol analysis are ongoing. Conclusions: Imexon can be administered safely with full dose gemcitabine. Accrual continues to define the combination MTD. The response rate in this phase I study compares favorably with historical gemcitabine monotherapy, and further phase II evaluation of this combination in advanced pancreatic cancer is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Additional primary malignancies in patients with pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 185-185
Author(s):  
Shyam S. Allamaneni ◽  
Rohit Sharma ◽  
Austin Miller ◽  
Saikrishna S. Yendamuri ◽  
John F. Gibbs
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Life Time ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Second Primary Malignancy ◽  
Primary Malignancy ◽  
Second Primaries

185 Background: Rates of second primary malignancy have been increasing with increased cancer survivorship. The published literature on second primaries in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is sparse. We addressed this question utilizing the SEER database. Methods: 99,614 patients of primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1973-2006 were identified from SEER database. Of these, 8,889 (8.93%) had another primary diagnosed before pancreatic cancer (BPC) and 1813 (1.82%) a second primary diagnosed after pancreatic cancer (APC). SAS was used for statistical analysis and P-value <0.05 was determined to be significant. Results: The most common non-pancreatic primary identified were prostate, breast, lung, colorectal, and urinary bladder. The median age at presentation was 75 and 71 years in the BPC and APC groups respectively. APC patients had higher odds of developing primary cancers of embryonic gut origin (esophagus, stomach, small intestine, hepatobiliary, lung, and thyroid) compared to PBC patients (p<0.05). Patients of BPC compared to APC were more likely to be older than 70 yrs (70.5% vs. 65.3% p=0.01), less likely to undergo surgery for pancreatic cancer (11.2% vs.5.87% p=<0.05) and with decreased median survival (7 vs.3 months). With each passing decade, increasing second primaries were diagnosed, presumably reflecting better overall survival from cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: Approximately 11% of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients have another cancer in their life time. Identifying common genetic and risk factors in these patients with multiple malignancies may provide the new therapeutic opportunities for patients with pancreatic cancer.

SMAD4 gene mutation and prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Olfa Derbel ◽  
Arnaud de la Fouchardière ◽  
Julien Peron ◽  
Francoise Desseigne ◽  
Pierre Heudel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Molecular Heterogeneity ◽  
Smad4 Gene ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Smad4 Expression

180 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains resistant to many key cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and novel targeted therapies. The molecular heterogeneity of this cancer may account for therapy failures to date, although the growing arsenal of novel targeted agents could translate into patient survival. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular features of advanced disease will afford new opportunities for investigation, therapeutic intervention and clinical management of patients afflicted with pancreatic cancer. Methods: Data of 46 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were analyzed. The clinicopathological parameters, the histologic features were determined and correlated to the stage at initial diagnosis and patterns of failure (locally advanced v metastatic disease). Using tissue microarray, we assessed the relationship of SMAD4 expression with the overall survival of patients. Results: Among the 46 treated patients, 32 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. 40% of patients died with metastatic disease and 15 % died with locally advance evolution. Loss of SMAD4 expression was found in 22% of patients and seems to be correlated with a high grade histologic features and progression to metastasis disease. Complementary data about correlation between the mutational status of SMAD4 and survival will be presented during congress. Conclusions: SMAD4 gene inactivation seems to be associated with poorer prognosis and disease progression. Prospective validation of SMAD4 as a predictive biomarker may personalize treatment strategies for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: A Western Australian experience.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 430-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Peter Dean ◽  
Nigel Spry ◽  
Alycea McGrath
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radical Radiotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Western Australian

430 Background: The optimal management of patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer is unclear. In the metastatic setting, superior response rates have been seen with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine compared to gemcitabine alone. We investigate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by radical radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, the majority proceeding to radical radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU, at two large Western Australian metropolitan hospitals from January 2009 to December 2014. Charts were reviewed to obtain patient characteristics, efficacy and tolerability. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilised to obtain survival curves. Results: Forty-two patients were identified as having locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, receiving nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine to a mean number of 5 cycles, the majority requiring dose reductions. Of these, thirty proceeded to radical radiotherapy; the majority receiving 3DCRT, 54 Gy, with concurrent 5-FU. Seven had sufficient response to therapy to be offered radical resection. Six went on to radical resection, all with R0 or close resection margins (2 with complete response). Median length of stay following surgery was 18 days, and there were no perioperative deaths. The median survival for patients proceeding with surgery was 30 months. Median survival was 23 months for those treated with chemoradiotherapy, and 10 months with chemotherapy alone. Conclusions: This retrospective investigation demonstrates that nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by radical radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU is a tolerable treatment option with encouraging results for patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. The R0 resection rate in patients that had adequate response to allow for radical resection is promising. Further studies are warranted.

Updated results of a phase 1 study combining the matrix metalloproteinase 9 inhibitor GS-5745 with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 363-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Carrie Baker Brachmann ◽  
Xi Huang ◽  
Julia D. Maltzman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Metalloproteinase 9

363 Background: GS-5745 is a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), an extracellular enzyme involved in matrix remodeling, tumor growth, and metastasis. We present data from patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma enrolled in an ongoing multi-indication phase 1 study (NCT01803282) evaluating GS-5745. Methods: Following a monotherapy dose finding stage, pts with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine (G) + nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane, A) and GS-5745 800 mg IV every 2 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Response was assessed every 8 weeks per RECIST version 1.1 criteria. Results: As of April 2016, 36 pts were enrolled (1 continues to receive GS-5745). The most frequently observed adverse events (AEs) of any grade include fatigue (75%), alopecia (55.6%), peripheral edema (55.6%) and nausea (50%). Grade ≥ 3 AEs observed in ≥ 10% of pts included neutropenia (25%), anemia (19.4%) and fatigue (13.9%). The median progression free survival (PFS) for all pts is 7.8 (90% confidence interval (CI) = [6.1, 11]) months (mos), median duration of response (DOR) is 5.8 mos and the objective response rate (ORR) is 44.4%. Of the 31 pts who were treatment naïve in the metastatic setting, median PFS is 9.2 (90% CI = [6.1, 11]) mos, median DOR 5.8 mos and the ORR 51.6%. Median baseline circulating MMP9 was 44.3 (range 12.4-549.6) ng/mL and 31 of 32 patients with post-baseline samples had undetectable MMP9 levels within 8 weeks. Conclusions: GS-5745+GA demonstrated numerically higher ORR and PFS compared to historical data without additional toxicity. Additionally, reductions in circulating MMP9 levels post treatment suggest target engagement by GS-5745 . These results suggest this combination may warrant additional study in first line metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01803282.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document