Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Acute Light Chain-Induced Renal Failure: Final Results of a Phase II Study

Abstract Background: Acute renal failure (ARF) is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma (MM) and most frequently due to clonotypic light chains (LC) causing cast nephropathy, which is associated with fast deterioration of renal function, increased risk for infections and shortened survival. Here we present the final results of a phase II study employing lenalidomide-dexamethasone as treatment for patients with acute light-chain induced ARF. Patients and methods: 35 patients with LC-induced ARF have been enrolled. Cast nephropathy was confirmed in all 15 patients who had a renal biopsy. Patients with previously unknown MM must have presented with eGFR < 50ml/min and serum creatinine ³2.0mg/dL, and those with previously established diagnosis must have had documented eGFR ³ 60ml/min and serum creatinine ≤1.2mg/dL within 6 weeks before deterioration of eGFR to < 50ml/min and of serum creatinine to ≥ 2mg/dL due to LC-induced kidney injury. Nine cycles of Lenalidomide, day 1-21, q28 days, with dose adaptation according to eGFR (eGFR 30 – 50ml/min: 10 mg daily, eGFR < 30ml/min without requiring dialysis: 15mg q 48 hrs., eGFR < 30ml/min requiring dialysis: 5 mg daily following each dialysis) and dexamethasone (Dex), 40 mg, day 1-4, 9-12 and 17-21 during the first cycle and thereafter 40 mg once weekly were planned. Renal response was defined as previously described (Dimopoulos et al, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2009, Ludwig et al. JCO 2010). Results: Patient's median age was: 66 (45-87), 28 patients had newly diagnosed and 7 previously established MM. 5.7% had ISS stage II, 94.3% stage III. 18 patients had light chain myeloma, 14 IgG, and 3 IgA isotype. Adverse cytogenetics t (4; 14) ± del17q ± 1q21 were detected in 14/29 patients. 4/35 patients died and 5 discontinued therapy (3 due to AEs, 1 due to PD, and 1 due to withdrawal of consent) within the first 2 cycles, leaving 26 patients for per protocol (PP) analysis. Median follow up was 17.7 months. Responses were seen in 25/35 (71.4%) patients; 7 (20%) had CR, 3 (8.6%) VGPR, 14 (40%) PR, and 1 (2.9%) MR. Median time to first and to best myeloma response was 28, and 92 days, respectively. Median baseline concentration of involved FLC was 5.465mg/L (range: 147–42.700mg/L) and 8350mg/L (range: 234– 35.500mg/L) in patients reaching ≥PR and ≤MR, respectively, and decreased significantly to a median of 95.75mg/L (range: 11.3–5.630mg/L, p <0.001) in the former, but not in the latter group. Renal response was observed in 16 (45.7%) of 35 patients (CRrenal, 5(14.2%), PRrenal, 7(20%), MRrenal, 5(14%)). Median time to renal and to best renal response was 28 and 157 days, respectively. Median eGFR increased significantly in patients with ≥ PR from 17.1ml/min at baseline to 39.1ml/min at best response (p<0.001), and from 23.7ml/min to 26.0ml/min in patients with ≤ MR (p=0.469) (figure 1A). Median PFS and OS were 5.5 and 21.8 months in the ITT and 12.1 and 31.4 months, respectively, in the PP group (figure 1B). Grade 3/4 anemia was seen in 43%, thrombocytopenia in 23% and neutropenia in 15% patients. Other non-haematologic AEs consisted mainly of grade 3-4/5 infection in 38%/9%, and of grade 3-4/5 cardiac toxicity in 11%/9% patients. Grade 3 diarrhea and vomiting/emesis were noted in 1 patient each. Conclusion: Lenalidomide (with dose adapted to eGFR) plus initial high dose Dex during the first cycle and low dose Dex during subsequent cycles resulted in rapid reduction of involved LC within 28 days in patients with ≥ PR. Overall, 71.4% of patients had a myeloma and 45.7% a renal response. Median eGFR increased significantly in patients with ≥ PR from 17.1ml/min at baseline to 39.1ml/min. Elderly patients experienced more toxicity and had more treatment discontinuations. Figure 1A. Median eGFR in patients with CR-PR and MR-NR at baseline and at best response. Figure 1A. Median eGFR in patients with CR-PR and MR-NR at baseline and at best response. Figure 1B. PFS and OS in the intent to treat and per protocol population. Figure 1B. PFS and OS in the intent to treat and per protocol population. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib-Doxorubicin-Dexamethasone (BDD) for Reversal of Acute Light Chain Induced Renal Failure (ARF) in Multiple Myeloma (MM). Results from a Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.3682.3682 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 3682-3682 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Heinz Ludwig ◽

Zdenek Adam ◽

Roman Hajek ◽

Richard Greil ◽

Felix Keil ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Failure ◽

Renal Function ◽

Light Chain ◽

Tumor Response ◽

Safety Analysis ◽

Tumor Control ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Renal Response ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Intent To Treat

Abstract Acute light chain induced renal failure (ARF) is a severe complication of progressive MM, leading to permanent renal dysfunction and dependence on chronic hemodialysis in a substantial proportion of patients (pts). Reversal of kidney failure can only be achieved by fast and substantial suppression of pathogenic light-chains with effective anti-MM therapy. Bortezomib in combination with doxorubicin and dexamethasone has been shown to be highly effective in newly diagnosed pts. In addition, bortezomib is well tolerated in pts with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and its half life is independent of renal function. In this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the BDD regimen in restoring renal function and in achieving tumor control in pts with light chain-induced renal failure. Up to now 67 of 70 planned pts have been enrolled. Documentation is available for 55 pts for intent to treat analysis and for 47 evaluable for renal and tumor response (age: median 66 years, range 41–79 years, ISS stage I: 2%, II: 13%, III: 85%. 37 (79%) of pts presented with de novo MM, and 10 (21%) with progressive disease; baseline median GFR 19.8 ml/min (range 3.7–49.9ml/min). ARF was defined in newly diagnosed pts as reduction of GFR to <50ml/min due to MM nephropathy, and in previously treated pts with signs of tumor progression and a GFR of ≥60ml/min within the last 4 weeks before enrolment as a reduction of GFR by >25% to <50ml/min. Treatment regimen: Bortezomib (1.3mg/m2, d 1, 4, 8, 11 until the first safety analysis; thereafter 1.0mg/m2 d 1, 4, 8, 11), doxorubicin (9mg/m2, d 1, 4, 8, 11 until first safety analysis; thereafter 9mg/m2, d 1 and 4) and dexamethasone 40mg (d 1, 4, 8, 11). Cycles were repeated every 21 days. 47 pts have completed at least 2 cycles and are evaluable for response as yet. 23 pts achieved CR/nCR (50%), 3 (6%) VGPR, 6 (13%) PR and 5 (11%) MR (CR-MR: 90%). Median time to response was 108 days. Median GFR increased from 19.8 ml/min (range: 3.7 – 49.9 ml/min) to 46.1ml/min (range 6.7 – 106 ml/min). Improvement of GFR correlated weakly with tumor response. In 26 pts with CR/nCR/VGPR, median GFR increased to 62 ml/min (10–106 ml/min). Best median GFR was 25 ml/min (11 – 106 ml/min) in 11 pts with PR/MR, and 22 ml/min (7 – 51 ml/min) in 10 pts with SD/PD. When renal response was defined either as complete (CRrenal: GFR≥60 ml/min), partial (PRrenal: increase from GFR <15 ml/min to 30–59 ml/min), or minor (MRrenal: increase in GFR either from < 15 ml/min to 15–29 ml/min or from 15–29 ml/min to 30–59 ml/min), a total of 15 (32%), and 14 (30%) pts achieved a CRrenal, or a PR/MRrenal, respectively, yielding an ORRrenal in 29 (62%) of pts (Table 1). Three of 8 dialysis dependent pts became dialysis independent. Table 1 Stage of renal failure at baseline (GFR) Number of pts Best renal response (number of pts, percentage) CRrenal PRrenal MRrenal Stage III 30–59ml/min 11 6 (55%) - - Stage IV 15–29ml/min 23 8 (35%) 8 (35%) - Stage V <15ml/min 13 1 (8%) 3 (23%) 3 (23%) Overall survival (OS) was 72% @ 2 years in the intent to treat and 78% @ 2 years in the evaluable population. OS was 76% @ 2 years in pts without CRrenal, and 86% in pts with CRrenal. Leucopenia, thrombopenia, and anemia of grade 3&4 were seen in 15%, 6% and 6%, respectively. Other common grade 3&4 toxicities were infection (4%), nausea/vomiting (6%), weakness/fatigue (11%) and polyneuropathy (8%). In conclusion, the BDD regimen resulted in high tumor (CR/VGPR 56%, ORR: 90%) and renal response rates (CRrenal 32%, ORRrenal 62%). Improvement of renal function was more often seen in pts with significant tumor response and CRrenal was more likely in pts with less severe renal impairment. Treatment was well tolerated after dose adjustment.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib-Doxorubicin-Dexamethasone (BDD) in Patients with Acute Light Chain Induced Renal Failure (ARF) in Multiple Myeloma (MM). Final Results of a Phase II Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3862.3862 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3862-3862 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Heinz Ludwig ◽

Zdenek Adam ◽

Roman Hajek ◽

Richard Greil ◽

Elena Tóthová ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Failure ◽

Renal Function ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Light Chain ◽

Tumor Response ◽

Safety Analysis ◽

Renal Response ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Intent To Treat

Abstract Abstract 3862 Poster Board III-798 Acute light chain (LC) induced renal failure (ARF) is a severe complication of progressive MM. Reversal of ARF can only be achieved by fast, substantial and continuous suppression of production of pathogenic LCs. Bortezomib is highly effective and well tolerated in myeloma patients (pts) with renal impairment, because its metabolism is independent of renal function. In this study we evaluated the efficacy of Bortezomib in combination with doxorubicin and dexamethasone (BDD) in restoring renal function and in achieving tumor control in pts with LC-induced renal failure. In total, 72 pts have been enrolled; 2 pts did not fulfil inclusion criteria, 2 pts had been excluded because kidney biopsy revealed renal amyloidosis as main cause of renal failure. Hence, 68 pts constituted the intent to treat population and 58 pts were evaluable per protocol (≥2 cycles of therapy). Age: median 65.8; range 41-79 years. Forty-six (79%) pts presented with de novo MM, and 12 (21%) with progressive, previously treated disease; median baseline GFR was 20.0 ml/min (range 3.7-49.5 ml/min). ARF was defined as decrease in GFR to <50ml/min due to LC nephropathy. Previously treated pts were required to have acute deterioration (< 4 weeks before inclusion) of formerly normal renal function (GFR „d60ml/min), and clear signs of progressive disease with increased LC excretion. Treatment regimen: Bortezomib (1.3mg/m2, d 1, 4, 8, 11 until the first safety analysis; thereafter 1.0mg/m2, d 1, 4, 8, 11), doxorubicin (9mg/m2, d 1, 4, 8, 11 until first safety analysis; thereafter 9mg/m2, d 1 and 4) and dexamethasone 40mg (d 1, 4, 8, 11). Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Renal response was defined as complete (CRrenal, with GFR ≥60 ml/min), partial (PRrenal with GFR increase >100%, from <15 ml/min to 30-<60 ml/min), or minor (MRrenal with GFR increase >50%, either from <15 ml/min to 15-<30 ml/min or from 15-<30 ml/min to 30-<60 ml/min). Twenty-six of 58 evaluable pts achieved CR/nCR (45%), 10 (17%) VGPR, 9 (16%) PR and 4 (7%) MR (CR-MR: 85%). Median time to best tumor response was 88 days. Twenty-one (36%) pts achieved CRrenal, and 19 (33%) pts PR/MRrenal, respectively, yielding an ORRrenal of 69%. Three of the 9 dialysis dependent pts became dialysis independent. Median GFR increased from 20.0 ml/min (range: 3.7 – 50.2 ml/min) to 48.4 ml/min (range 6.7 – 135.5 ml/min). Improvement of GFR correlated weakly with tumor response. The median of best GFR increased to 60.0 ml/min (14.7-131.3 ml/min) in the 36 pts with CR/nCR/VGPR, to 38.9 ml/min (14.7 – 135.5 ml/min) in the 13 pts with PR/MR, and to 16.8 ml/min (6.7 – 57.9 ml/min) in 9 the pts with SD/PD, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was 72% @ 1 and 60% @ 2 years in the intent to treat and 84% @ 1 and 70% @ 2 years in the evaluable population. OS was similar in pts with and without complete renal response (p= 0.9267). Univariate analysis revealed a significant association between both, treatment status (previously treated vs. not previously treated), and LDH with survival (p<0.0003, and p<0.0232, respectively), while in multivariate analysis (Cox regression) treatment status only was found to correlate with survival (p=0.0211). Leukopenia, thrombopenia, and anemia of grade 3&4 were seen in 12%, 14% and 48%, respectively. Other common grade 3&4 toxicities were weakness/fatigue (12%) and polyneuropathy (10%), infection (7%), herpes reactivation (7%) and nausea/vomiting (5%). In conclusion, the BDD regimen resulted in high tumor (CR/nCR/VGPR: 62%, ORR: 85%) and renal response rates (CRrenal 36%, ORRrenal 69%). Improvement of renal function was more often seen in pts with significant tumor response and CRrenal was more likely in pts with less severe renal impairment. Treatment was well tolerated after dose adjustment. Disclosures: Ludwig: Celgene: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; AMGEN: Honoraria; Ortho-Biotech : Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Hajek:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Rapid Reduction of Light-Chains and Proteinuria in Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients with Light Chain Induced Acute Renal Failure Treated with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.5114.5114 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 5114-5114

Author(s):

Heinz Ludwig ◽

Josef Thaler ◽

Jan Koren ◽

Ludek Pour ◽

Ercan Müldür ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Failure ◽

Renal Function ◽

Median Time ◽

Light Chain ◽

De Novo ◽

Light Chains ◽

High Risk Population ◽

Renal Response ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 5114 Introduction: Light chain-induced renal failure (LC-ARF) is a severe complication of MM associated with increased risk of infections, dependency on chronic hemodialysis and shortened survival. Reversibility of renal impairment depends on the degree of renal damage, the duration of renal failure and the quality of response to anti-myeloma therapy. In this phase II trial we assess the efficacy of lenalidomide-dexamethasone in reducing pathogenic light chains and restoring renal function. In addition, we analyze the kinetics of treatment response in patients with LC-ARF. Patients and Methods: 24 patients with LC-ARF as formerly defined (JCO 2010) have been enrolled so far. Age (median): 65.5 years (range: 46–78 years), Gender: male/female: 12/12. All patients presented with ISS stage III. 20 (83.3%) had de novo MM and 4 (16.7%) previously treated, but relapsing disease. Median GFR was 19.9 ml/min (range 6.1 – 37.2 ml/min). ECOG performance was 0 in 6, I-II in 14 and III-IV in 4 patients, respectively. One patient died before first study medication, 3 patients died within the first cycle and 2 patients dropped out early (< 2 cycles). Lenalidomide was given from d 1–21 with dose adaptation according to GFR. Dexamethasone 40 mg was administered on d 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 during cycle 1; thereafter 1x/week. Cycles were repeated q 4 weeks. Results: Presently, 17 patients are evaluable for response (completed ≥2 cycles and fully documented). The median number of cycles is 9 (range 2–9). CR was achieved in 5 (31.3%), nCR in 4 (25%), VGPR in 2 (12.5%) and PR in 5 (25%) patients, respectively, yielding an ORR (CR+nCR+VGPR+PR) of 94% for the evaluable and 69.6% for the ITT population. Median time to best tumor response was 132 days. The greatest proportional reduction in 24 hour urinary excretion (86%) in responding patients occurred within the first 4 weeks of therapy, with only little further improvement beyond that time (figure 1). Renal response was assessed as formerly defined (JCO 2010). 3 patients achieved CRrenal, 3 PRrenal and 5 MRrenal, yielding an ORRrenal in 11 patients (64.7% of the evaluable and 47.8% of the ITT population). Median time to best renal response was 83 days. 3 of 10 dialysis dependent patients became dialysis independent. Median GFR of evaluable patients increased from 15.2 (range 6.1 – 35.1 ml/min) at baseline to a median best GFR of 28.3 ml/min (range 11.3 – 101.1 ml/min) (p<0.0075). The greatest increase in median GFR was noted in the 5 patients with CR (26.7 to 60.9 ml/min, p<0.024) while in those with nCR/VGPR/PR a less pronounced improvement in GFR (10.6 to 22.4 ml/min, p<0.025) was observed Tolerance: Full documentation of adverse events is presently available in 23 patients. Four patients died, 1 (4.3%) each due to infection and cardiac arrest and 2 (8.7%) with unknown causes of death (sudden death). Grade 3/4 anemia, thrombopenia and leucopenia, were seen in 11 (47.8%), 7 (30.4%), and 3 (13%) patients, respectively. Other common grade 3/4 toxicities were infection/sepsis in 9 (39.1%), and cardiac dysfunction in 5 (21.7%) patients, respectively. Exanthema and fatigue were seen in 2 patients (8.7%), and pulmonary embolism and macula edema in 1 patient each (4.3%). Conclusions: LD showed significant anti-myeloma activity with an overall response rate of 94% in the evaluable and of 69.9% in the ITT population. The greatest proportional decrease in 24 hour proteinuria (86%) was obtained already within the first 4 weeks of therapy while renal recovery occurred with delay only. Improvement in renal function was obtained in 65% of the evaluable and in 48% of the ITT population. Toxicity of the LD regimen with the lenalidomide dose adjusted to GFR was as expected in this high risk population. Updated results will be presented. Disclosures: Ludwig: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Combined Bendamustine, Prednisone and Bortezomib (BPV) In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Light Chain Induced Renal Failure

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3203.3203 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3203-3203 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Wolfram Pönisch ◽

Barbara Moll ◽

Dietger Niederwieser

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Failure ◽

Renal Dysfunction ◽

Light Chain ◽

Severe Side Effect ◽

Renal Response ◽

Group A ◽

Severe Renal Dysfunction ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Group B

Abstract Introduction Serious renal failure represents a main complication of Multiple Myeloma (MM). An estimated 25% to 50% of patients are affected during the course of their disease. These patients are at increased risk for infections and have a significantly worse prognosis. Small phase I/II studies suggest that treatment with chemotherapy and/or new substances results in recovery of renal function in more than 25%. The window of opportunity for reversal of renal impairment is rather small making an immediate and highly active treatment strategy mandatory. Bortezomib and bendamustine have turned out to be quickly acting and effective drugs in the treatment of MM. Methods Between March 2005 and March 2013, 36 patients (median age 64; range 32-81 years) with relapsed/refractory MM and light chain induced renal failure (creatinine clearance <60ml/min) were treated with bendamustine 60mg/qm on day 1 and 2, bortezomib 1.3mg/qm on day 1, 4, 8 and 11, and prednisone 100mg on day 1, 2, 4, 8 and 11. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (n=20) consisted of patients with moderate or severe renal dysfunction (eGFR 15-59ml/min) and group B (n=16) of patients with renal failure/dialysis (eGFR <15ml/min). Results The median number of the BPV-treatment was 2 (1-7) cycles. 24 patients (67%) responded after at least one cycle of chemotherapy with 3 CR, 3 nCR, 6 VGPR, and 12 PR. Six patients had MR, 2 patients stable disease and 4 patients had a progress. With a median follow up of 22 months of the surviving patients, median PFS and OS for patients with moderate or severe renal dysfunction (group A) were 10 months and 25 months, respectively. Outcome for these patients was significantly better compared to patients with renal failure/dialysis (group B) with a median PFS and OS of 3 months and 7 months, respectively (p<0.02). Eleven patients showed a CRrenal, 5 patients a PRrenal and 15 patients a MRrenal. Median time to first renal response and best renal response were 21 days and 42 days, respectively. The most common severe side effect was grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 81% of the patients. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 50% of the patients. Moderate to severe infections were seen in 13 patients. Summary These results indicate that the combination of bortezomib, bendamustine and prednisone is effective and well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory MM and light chain induced renal failure. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Significant Activity of Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients with Light Chain Induced Acute Renal Failure (LC-ARF)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4031.4031 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4031-4031

Author(s):

Heinz Ludwig ◽

Elisabeth Rauch ◽

Thomas Kuhr ◽

Adalbert Weissman ◽

Daniel Heintel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Failure ◽

Clin Oncol ◽

Median Time ◽

Light Chain ◽

Oral Candidiasis ◽

Renal Tubules ◽

Significant Activity ◽

Renal Response ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Renal Responses

Abstract Abstract 4031 Introduction: Excessive production of free light chains with affinity for uromodulin results in protein aggregates and toxic injury of distal renal tubules. The ensuing renal failure is a significant risk factor for infections, dependency on chronic hemodialysis and reduced survival. Management of this emergency includes rapid confirmation of the diagnosis and prompt installment of effective anti-myeloma therapy. Here, we assess the efficacy of lenalidomide-dexamethasone for treatment of patients with LC-ARF. Patients and Methods: 32 patients with LC-ARF as formerly defined (J. Clin. Oncol. 2010 20; 28(30):4635-41) have been enrolled so far. Age (median): 66 years (range: 46–87 years), Gender: male/female: 17/15. All patients presented with ISS stage III. 26 (81.3%) had de novo MM and 6 (18.8%) previously treated, but relapsing disease. Median GFR was 19.9 ml/min (range 6.1 – 37.2 ml/min). ECOG performance status was 0 in 9, I-II in 18 and III-IV in 5 patients, respectively. Lenalidomide was given from d 1–21 with dose adaptation according to GFR as suggested in the prescribing information. Dexamethasone 40 mg was administered on d 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 during cycle 1; thereafter 1x/week. Cycles were repeated q 4 weeks. Results: Presently, 23 patients are evaluable for response (completed ≥2 cycles and fully documented). The median follow-up is 7.7 months, median number of cycles is 9 (range 2–9). CR was achieved in 5 (21.7%), nCR in 1 (4%), VGPR in 2 (8%) and PR in 13 (52%) patients, MR in 1 (3%), respectively, yielding an ORR (CR+nCR+VGPR+PR) of 91.3% for evaluable patients and 65.6% for the ITT population. Median time to first myeloma response was 28 (range 27–63 days) and to best response was 113 days (34–304 days). The cumulative incidence of all patients with myeloma and renal responses are shown in figure 1. Median PFS and OS were 13.8 and 31.2 months respectively in the evaluable patients and 7.4 and 31.2 months in the ITT population. Renal response was assessed as formerly defined (J Clin Oncol. 2010 20; 28(30):4635-41). 4 patients achieved CRrenal, 8 PRrenal and 3 MRrenal, yielding an ORRrenal in 15 patients (65.2% of the evaluable and 46.9% of the ITT population). Median time to first renal response was 28 (range: 27–34) days, and to best renal response 119 days (34–304 days). 5 of 13 dialysis dependent patients became dialysis independent. Median GFR of evaluable patients increased from 15.2 (range 6.1 – 35.1 ml/min) at baseline to a median best GFR of 31.4 ml/min (range 11.3 – 103.2 ml/min). In the 5 patients with CR a significant increase in GFR (median 26.7 to 60.9 ml/min) and in the 16 patients with nCR/VGPR/PR an increase from 13.5 to 30.1 ml/min was observed. Full documentation of adverse events is presently available in 32 patients. 5 patients died within the first 2 months, 2 (8.7%) each due to infection and cardiac arrest and 1 (4.3%) with apoplexia. Grade 3/4 anemia, thrombopenia and leucopenia, were seen in 17 (53.1%), 9 (28.1%), and 5 (15.6%) patients, respectively. Other common grade 3/4 toxicities were infection/sepsis in 13 (40.6%), and cardiac dysfunction in 8 (25%) patients, respectively. Exanthema G3 was seen in 3 patients (9.3%), pulmonary embolism, macula edema and multiple stroke syndrome in 1 (3.1%), potassium deficiency G3/4 in 5 (15.6%), and oral candidiasis in 2 patients (6.3%) each. Conclusions: LD showed significant anti-myeloma activity with an overall myeloma response rate (CR-PR) of 91.3% in the evaluable of 65.5% in the ITT cohort. Renal responses (CRrenal-PRrenal) were observed in 65.2% and 46.9% patients, respectively. Time to first myeloma and first renal response was fast (28 days each). The LD regimen with the lenalidomide dose adjusted to GFR was well tolerated. Updated results will be presented. Disclosures: Ludwig: Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide was used of label in combination with dexamethasone in this phase II study in patients with acute light-chain induced renal failure.

Download Full-text

Clinically Suspected Cast Nephropathy: A Retrospective, Multi-Center, Real-World Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124336 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5553-5553

Author(s):

Agoston Gyula Szabo ◽

Jonathan Thorsen ◽

Charlotte Toftmann Hansen ◽

Maja Ølholm Vase ◽

Manuela Teodorescu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Failure ◽

Serum Creatinine ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Kidney Biopsy ◽

Population Based ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cast Nephropathy ◽

Initiation Of Therapy

INTRODUCTION Myeloma cast nephropathy (CN) is the most common form of monoclonal immunoglobulin-mediated kidney disease, resulting from the precipitation of excessive amounts of monoclonal serum free light chains (sFLC) and causing around 70% of the cases of dialysis-dependent renal failure in multiple myeloma (MM)(Heher et al. 2013; Nasr et al. 2012; Sanders et al. 1991). In patients with acute renal failure, the finding of a high sFLC concentration with an abnormal sFLC ratio raises the clinical suspicion of CN (Hutchison et al. 2011). Although the histopathologic diagnosis of CN is established by renal biopsy, in routine clinical practice, the diagnostic yield of this procedure is often outweighed by the urgent need of anti-myeloma treatment and the risk of procedure-related complications. Recruitment of patients with CN into clinical trials is challenging and therefore real-world data on clinically suspected CN are necessary to understand the clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis of these patients (Bridoux et al. 2017; Hutchison et al. 2019). METHODS We searched the population-based Danish Multiple Myeloma Registry for patients diagnosed with MM according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria between 1st of January 2013 and 31st of December 2017 with a serum creatinine concentration of 200 µg/L or higher and a sFLC concentration of 1000 mg/L or higher at diagnosis. We conducted a retrospective patient chart review in eight Danish centers and assessed baseline characteristics, biopsy results, and overall survival. Anti-myeloma treatment, sFLC levels and renal function were registered during the first 12 months after MM diagnosis. RESULTS We identified 181 patients (176 with accessible clinical records). The median age was 72 years, the median serum creatinine was 384 µg/L, the median involved sFLC concentration was 5960 mg/L and dialysis dependent renal failure was present in 35%. Pre-myeloma estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was available in 80%, the median eGFR was 66 ml/min/1.73 m2. A kidney biopsy was carried out in 21% of patients and showed CN in 70% of cases. The median time from first sFLC measurement to initiation of therapy was 4 days. The number of lines of therapy ranged between zero and six. 173 patients received one, 35 patients received two and 14 patients received three lines of therapy during the first 12 months from diagnosis. High-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) was carried out in 45 (26%) patients. Bortezomib was administered as part of the first-line regimen in 163 (94%) patients. The most common first-line regimens were bortezomib-dexamethasone (n=67) and cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (n=46). The first line of therapy resulted in very good partial response or better in 50% (Figure 1A), but was discontinued due to death, toxicity or progressive disease in 38% of patients. Dialysis dependency, eGFR and involved sFLC concentration were assessed at the end of the first cycle, at three months, six months and 12 months after initiation of therapy. At all these time points, achievement of renal recovery was associated with the magnitude of reduction of involved sFLC (Figure 1B). The median overall survival was 3.3 years (Figure 1C). At 12 months after diagnosis, 68% of patients were alive and 15% were dialysis dependent. Reduction of the initial involved sFLC concentration to ≤ 10% at three months was strongly associated with longer OS in a multivariate cox regression analysis adjusted for age and HDT-ASCT; hazard ratio 0.42, p=0.003. CONCLUSION In conclusion, we assessed a population-based cohort of newly diagnosed MM patients presenting with a serum creatinine of 200 µg/L or higher together with a sFLC of 1000 mg/L or higher. Although CN could have been clinically suspected in these cases, a kidney biopsy was only performed in one fifth of the population. Bortezomib-based therapy was initiated quickly and resulted in deep responses in most patients. Approximately one third of patients died within a year from MM diagnosis. Achievement of early and deep reduction in involved sFLC resulted in longer OS. Figure 1 Disclosures Szabo: Janssen: Consultancy. Vangsted:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Plesner:Celgene: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Randomized Multicenter Phase II Study Comparing a Combination of Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid and Alternating Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin With Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in Fluorouracil-Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2001.19.22.4195 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 19 (22) ◽

pp. 4195-4201 ◽

Cited By ~ 47

Author(s):

Yves Bécouarn ◽

Erick Gamelin ◽

Bruno Coudert ◽

Sylvie Négrier ◽

Jean-Yves Pierga ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Folinic Acid ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Survival Times ◽

Activity Data ◽

Randomized Phase Ii ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Intent To Treat ◽

Colorectal Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: To assess antitumor activity and safety of two regimens in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with proven fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in a randomized phase II study: 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) combined with alternating irinotecan (also called CPT-11) and oxaliplatin (FC/FO tritherapy), and an oxaliplatin/irinotecan (OC) combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients were treated: arm FC/FO (32 patients) received, every 4 weeks, FA 200 mg/m2 followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus injection, then a 600-mg/m2 continuous infusion of 5-FU on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks administered alternately with irinotecan (180 mg/m2 on day 1) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 on day 15). Arm OC (30 patients) received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis, two partial responses lasting 10.7 and 16 months were observed with the tritherapy regimen, and seven (median duration, 11 months; range, 10.6 to 11.4 months) were observed with the bitherapy regimen. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.2 and 9.8 months, respectively, in the FC/FO arm and 8.5 and 12.3 months, respectively, in the OC arm. Main grade 3/4 toxicities were, respectively, neutropenia, 53% and 47%; febrile neutropenia, 13% and 3%; diarrhea, 19% and 10%; vomiting, 6% and 13%; and neurosensory toxicity, 3% and 3%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The every-3-weeks OC combination is safe and active in advanced 5-FU–resistant CRC patients. The lower activity data seen with the tritherapy regimen may be related to the lower dose intensities of irinotecan and oxaliplatin in this schedule.

Download Full-text

A phase II study of sunitinib in recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma: A trial of the PMH Phase II Consortium

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.5576 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 5576-5576

Author(s):

S. Welch ◽

H. J. Mackay ◽

H. Hirte ◽

G. F. Fleming ◽

R. Morgan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase Ii ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Open Label ◽

Second Stage ◽

Best Response ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Ecog Ps

5576 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression in EC correlates with poor outcome, thus targeting VEGF is a rational therapeutic approach. We have conducted a two-stage open-label phase II study in advanced EC with sunitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple VEGF receptors. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or metastatic EC and have received up to 1 prior chemotherapy (CT) regimen for metastatic disease. Sunitinib is given at 50 mg daily (OD) for 4 consecutive weeks (wks) followed by 2 wks off. Dose could be reduced to 37.5 mg OD and then 25 mg OD in the setting of toxicity. Imaging is repeated every 12 wks. Primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) and rate of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). If 1 or more responses occur in the first 15 evaluable pts, the study would continue to a second stage (total = 30 pts). Secondary objectives are time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We report the results of the first stage of this study. Sixteen pts have been treated (median age: 63; range 41–74) with 37 cycles of sunitinib (median 2; range: 1–7). Baseline ECOG PS was 0 (7 pts), 1 (8 pts), or 2 (1 pt). Histology was endometrioid (7 pts), serous (5 pts), clear cell (1 pt), or mixed/other (3 pts). Most pts had high-grade histology (G3: 8; G2: 4; G1: 2; GX: 2). Nine pts had prior adjuvant CT, 8 pts had 1 prior CT for advanced EC, 4 pts had prior hormones and 7 pts had prior radiotherapy. Partial response was achieved by 2 pts (ORR = 12.5%), and 2 other pts had a best response of stable disease; 3 of these pts remained progression-free > 6 months. Median TTP = 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.47-NR), and median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-NR). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in >10% of pts were fatigue (7 pts, 44%) and hypertension (5 pts, 31%). Dose reduction was required for 11 of 16 pts (69%). Two pts were inevaluable after receiving <2 cycles due to AE (grade 4 hyponatremia; grade 3 fatigue) and 1 other pt has yet to complete 2 cycles. Conclusions: Sunitinib shows preliminary activity in EC. This trial will proceed to a second stage of accrual to further explore the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in advanced EC. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance (MGRS) in South America

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113198 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5856-5856

Author(s):

Camila Peña ◽

Gonzalo P Mendez ◽

Natalia Paola Schutz ◽

Eloisa Riva ◽

Ricardo Valjalo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Failure ◽

Renal Biopsy ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Light Chain ◽

Monoclonal Gammopathy ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Protein Electrophoresis ◽

Renal Response ◽

Series Study

Abstract Background Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is a recently defined entity. It is a group of renal diseases due to paraprotein deposition from a small B lymphocyte or plasma cell clon, not meeting the criteria for an overt gammopathy-associated neoplasm. Despite this feature, the secondary kidney damage may be severe and irreversible; therefore, its early recognition and treatment are crucial. There are few studies on MGRS in the international literature, and no reported data from Latin America (LA). Aims To describe epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with MGRS in LA. To evaluate patients outcomes. Material and methods This is an international multicentric retrospective case series study. All members of GELAMM (Grupo de estudio latinoamericano de Mieloma Múltiple) were invited to participate. Patients with diagnosis of MGRS according to the IMWG definition were included. All cases had pathological diagnosis provided by a renal biopsy. Epidemiological and clinical data were collected from clinical records in a standardized report form. Renal response was arbitrarily defined as the partial or total recovery of renal failure or renal symtoms at the end of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by descriptive statistics using STATA 12. Results We received data from 18 patients, from centers in Chile, Argentina and Uruguay. Median follow up was 22,5 months. The patients characteristics are shown in table 1. The median age was 58 years (36 to 78 years). Male to female ratio was 1:1,25. Twelve had history of hypertension and one patient of renal transplantation. Anemia was present in 78% of cases (mean 10,7g/dL +/-2,3), hypoalbuminemia in 72% (mean 2,8g/dL +/-0,7), renal failure in 83% (mean creatinine of 4,6mg/dL +/- 4,8) with 47% of these (7 patients) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Proteinuria was measured in 16 patients. Its average was 4,4gr (range 0,12 - 11,5gr/24hrs). LDH and calcemia were normal in all cases. Half of the patients presented as a nephrotic syndrome. Regarding histological subtypes, the most frequently diagnosed was the proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID). The paraprotein most frequently found was Kappa, and in the renal biopsy was IgG Kappa deposition (table 1). Serum protein electrophoresis (sPEP) was performed in all cases. Only 8 out 18 patients underwent urine protein electrophoresis (uPEP) and 14 had urine and serum immunofixation (IFX) done. Serum free light chain (sFLC) were performed in 94% of the patients. The paraprotein identification according to each of this exams is shown in figure 1. Seventeen patients received treatment; 13 received an anti-plasma cell drug, 7 a thalidomide based regimen and 6 a bortezomib based regimen. The patient with IgM MGRS was treated with a rituximab based regimen. Regarding renal responses, there were no data in 5 patients. Nine out 13 of the patients achieved renal response: 3 achieved partial recovery and 9 complete recovery. Three patients become RRT independent. There was no mortality in our cohort. No patient relapsed, but 3 progressed: 1 to multiple myeloma (MM), 1 to systemic amyloidosis and another to systemic light chain deposition disease (LCDD). Discussion Only 18 cases from 3 South American countries were collected. The lack of hematologists in some countries, difficulties in achieving a renal biopsy, non-availability of immunofluorescence in the histological studies and few experienced pathologists could be some of the problems in our region. Our cohort is of rather young patients, which is probably related to the fact that these patients are mostly undergoing renal biopsy. We believe, however, that the incidence of MGRS (similar to what happens with MGUS), increases with age, which could mean a problem of underdiagnoses. As expected, nephropathies frequently associated with MM were found: AL amyloidosis and LCDD. However, the most common renal pathology was PGNMID, a rare entity. This data must be corroborated with a larger study. The high sensitivity of sFLC to identify the paraprotein was corroborated and highlighted the importance of this test in the follow up. Half of patients achieved a renal response, which reinforces the fact that they must be promptly treated. Conclusion According to our knowledge, this is the larger cases series study in LA, and we hope it will be a contribution to the knowledge of this pathology. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Renal involvement as the first symptom of multiple myeloma

10.21203/rs.2.10471/v2 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Yongjing Du ◽

Ping Zhang ◽

Xiang Zhong ◽

Shasha Chen ◽

Guisen Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Failure ◽

Nephrotic Syndrome ◽

Light Chain ◽

Clinical Laboratory ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Clinical Manifestations ◽

Renal Amyloidosis ◽

Cast Nephropathy ◽

Immunofixation Electrophoresis

Abstract Background . Renal involvement is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM). However, most studies have focused on renal failure in MM, and little information is available about the other renal manifestations in MM and their association with immunophenotypes and renal pathology. Methods . We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, laboratory and pathology data of 283 MM patients treated in Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, West China, between January 1990 and May 2017. The patients were divided into a renal involvement group (n = 200) and a non-renal involvement group (n = 83). Results. In the renal involvement group, 90 (45.0%) patients were diagnosed with MM in the Nephrology department, and isolated proteinuria, renal failure and nephrotic syndrome were detected in 90(45.0%), 94 (47.0%) and 58 (29.0%) patients, respectively. 135 patients with renal involvement underwent immunofixation electrophoresis, and IgG, IgA, IgD, IgE, pure light chain and nonsecretory MM were detected in 52 (38.5%), 32 (23.7%), 1 (0.7%), 1 (0.7%), 45(33.3%) and 4 (3.0%) patients, respectively. 47 patients without renal involvement also underwent immunofixation electrophoresis, and IgG and IgA MM were found in 24 (51.0%) and 18 (38.3%) patients, respectively. Severe anemia and hypertension, hypercalcemia and pure light chain were more frequent in patients with renal involvement (P < 0.05).9 patients with renal involvement were performed renal biopsy, and cast nephropathy, renal amyloidosis were proved in 5 and 4 patients, respectively. Conclusions. Renal involvement was common at MM diagnosis and had diverse clinical manifestations. The most common clinical manifestations include renal failure, isolated albuminuria and nephrotic syndrome. Nephrologists should rule out MM in patients presenting with renal involvement.

Download Full-text