scholarly journals Analyses of Real World Data on Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma Patients with at Least 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Including a PI and an IMiD, or Double Refractory to a PI and an IMiD

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4498-4498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Usmani ◽  
Tahamtan Ahmadi ◽  
Yvette Ng ◽  
Annette Lam ◽  
Ravi Potluri ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To fully evaluate the potential benefit of novel agents for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who are heavily pretreated and refractory, it is important to understand the outcomes of this patient population based on current real-world experience. An International Myeloma Working Group study determined that the median overall survival (OS) of patients refractory to bortezomib (proteasome inhibitor, PI) and at least 1 immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) was 9 months (Kumar S et al. Leukemia 2012; 26: 149). Since then, other therapies have been approved for relapsed and refractory MM in the United States (US), including pomalidomide (IMiD) and carfilzomib (PI). In this analysis, real-world data were used to define the treatment landscape and outcomes of patients with MM refractory to PIs and IMiDs or who had received ³3 prior lines of therapy (LOT; including a PI and an IMiD) and provide context to results from the single-agent daratumumab phase 2 study MMY2002 (Sirius) recently presented at ASCO 2015 (Lonial S. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 suppl; abstr LBA8512). Methods: Two independent databases were analyzed.TheIMS LifeLink: IMS Oncology Electronic Medical Records (EMR) Database (IMS Health Incorporated, Danbury, CT) and the OPTUM Database (OPTUM, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN) both comprised US patients only. For the IMS LifeLink database, patient records from the index period of 2000-2011 were screened. For the OPTUM database, the indexing period was 2007-2014. Median OS was assessed for cohorts that met the criteria of disease that was double refractory to a PI and IMiD (Criteria 1) or had been treated with ³3 LOT including a PI and IMiD and showed disease progression within 60 days on completion of last regimen (Criteria 2). Patients who met Criteria 1 could have received ³3 prior LOT, however those who met Criteria 2 only did not meet the double refractory criteria. Subgroup analyses of the eligible population were conducted on those who were only double refractory and triple/quadruple refractory. Results: For the IMS LifeLink database, 4,030 patients with MM were screened, approximately 90% of patients were diagnosed with MM in 2006 or later, and 500 met the criteria for the target population. Of the 500 patients, 323 patients met Criteria 1 and 177 patients only met Criteria 2. For the OPTUM database, 3,837 patients with MM were screened, approximately 90% of patients were diagnosed after 2009, and 162 met the criteria for the target population, 120 of whom met Criteria 1 and 42 of whom only met Criteria 2. In the total eligible populations, median OS was 239 days in the IMS LifeLink dataset compared with 240 days in the OPTUM dataset (P = 0.5358). Among patients that were only double refractory (triple/quadruple refractory patients excluded), median OS was 228 days (n = 253) in the IMS LifeLink dataset compared with 259 days (n = 97) in the OPTUM dataset (P = 0.8052). In triple/quadruple refractory patients, median OS was 154 days (n = 70) in the IMS LifeLink dataset and 95 days (n = 23) in the OPTUM dataset (P = 0.6675). The results from both databases were consistent, hence the data were pooled for further analyses; the pooled analyses indicated that the median OS was 240 days for the eligible population (n = 662), 237 days for patients who were only double refractory (n = 350), and 154 days for patients who were triple/quadruple refractory (n = 93). A naïve comparison of the OS curves from the MMY2002 study and the pooled analysis suggests a survival benefit with daratumumab versus the real-world historical control (Figure). Conclusions: Analyses of real-world data from two independent US patient databases indicated that outcomes remain poor among patients with MM who are heavily pretreated and/or highly refractory despite the availability and use of newer PIs and IMiDs, such as carfilzomib and pomalidomide. Median OS of approximately 8 months was observed in patients with ≥3 LOT (including a PI and IMiD) or refractory to a PI and IMiD. These data not only highlight the critical need for new MM treatments for patients with advanced MM, but also provide a point of reference against which novel agents such as daratumumab could be evaluated. Disclosures Usmani: Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ahmadi:Janssen: Employment. Ng:Janssen: Employment. Lam:Janssen: Employment. Potluri:Smart Analyst: Employment. Mehra:Janssen: Employment.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Keiichi Akizuki ◽  
Hitoshi Matsuoka ◽  
Takanori Toyama ◽  
Ayako Kamiunten ◽  
Masaaki Sekine ◽  
...  

The prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) has improved with the introduction of novel agents. These data are largely derived from clinical trials and might not reflect real-world patient outcomes accurately. We surveyed real-world data from 284 patients newly diagnosed with MM between 2010 and 2018 in Miyazaki Prefecture. The median follow-up period was 32.8 months. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years, with 68% of patients aged >65 years. The International Staging System (ISS) stage at diagnosis was I in 18.4% of patients, II in 34.1%, and III in 47.5%. Bortezomib-containing regimens were preferred as initial treatment; they were used in 147 patients (51.8%). In total, 80% of patients were treated with one or more novel agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide, or bortezomib). Among 228 patients who were treated with novel agents as an initial treatment, the overall response rate (partial response (PR) or better) to initial treatment was 78.4%, and the median time to next treatment (TTNT) was 11.6 months. In the multivariate analysis, PR or better responses to initial treatment were independently favorable prognostic factors for TTNT. The median survival time after initial therapy for patients with novel agents was 56.4 months and 3-year overall survival (OS) was 70.4%. In multivariate analysis, ISS stage I/II disease and PR or better response to initial treatment, and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 704-711
Author(s):  
Stergios Intzes ◽  
Marianthi Symeonidou ◽  
Konstantinos Zagoridis ◽  
Zoe Bezirgiannidou ◽  
Aikaterini Pentidou ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (9) ◽  
pp. 1946-1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luz Tarín-Arzaga ◽  
Daniela Arredondo-Campos ◽  
Victor Martínez-Pacheco ◽  
Odra Martínez-González ◽  
Alba Ramírez-López ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4839-4839
Author(s):  
Kristina Bardenheuer ◽  
Alun Passey ◽  
Maria d'Errico ◽  
Barbara Millier ◽  
Carine Guinard-Azadian ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The Haematology Outcomes Network in EURope (HONEUR) is an interdisciplinary initiative aimed at improving patient outcomes by analyzing real world data across hematological centers in Europe. Its overarching goal is to create a secure network which facilitates the development of a collaborative research community and allows access to big data tools for analysis of the data. The central paradigm in the HONEUR network is a federated model whereby the data stays at the respective sites and the analysis is executed at the local data sources. To allow for a uniform data analysis, the common data model 'OMOP' (Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership) was selected and extended to accommodate specific hematology data elements. Objective: To demonstrate feasibility of the OMOP common data model for the HONEUR network. Methods: In order to validate the architecture of the HONEUR network and the applicability of the OMOP common data model, data from the EMMOS registry (NCT01241396) have been used. This registry is a prospective, non-interventional study that was designed to capture real world data regarding treatments and outcomes for multiple myeloma at different stages of the disease. Data was collected between Oct 2010 and Nov 2014 on more than 2,400 patients across 266 sites in 22 countries. Data was mapped to the OMOP common data model version 5.3. Additional new concepts to the standard OMOP were provided to preserve the semantic mapping quality and reduce the potential loss of granularity. Following the mapping process, a quality analysis was performed to assess the completeness and accuracy of the mapping to the common data model. Specific critical concepts in multiple myeloma needed to be represented in OMOP. This applies in particular for concepts like treatment lines, cytogenetic observations, disease progression, risk scales (in particular ISS and R-ISS). To accommodate these concepts, existing OMOP structures were used with the definition of new concepts and concept-relationships. Results: Several elements of mapping data from the EMMOS registry to the OMOP common data model (CDM) were evaluated via integrity checks. Core entities from the OMOP CDM were reconciled against the source data. This was applied for the following entities: person (profile of year of birth and gender), drug exposure (profile of number of drug exposures per drug, at ATC code level), conditions (profile of number of occurrences of conditions per condition code, converted to SNOMED), measurement (profile of number of measurements and value distribution per (lab) measurement, converted to LOINC) and observation (profile of number of observations per observation concept). Figure 1 shows the histogram of year of birth distribution between the EMMOS registry and the OMOP CDM. No discernible differences exist, except for subjects which have not been included in the mapping to the OMOP CDM due to lacking confirmation of a diagnosis of multiple myeloma. As additional part of the architecture validation, the occurrence of the top 20 medications in the EMMOS registry and the OMOP CDM were compared, with a 100% concordance for the drug codes, which is shown in Figure 2. In addition to the reconciliation against the different OMOP entities, a comparison was also made against 'derived' data, in particular 'time to event' analysis. Overall survival was plotted from calculated variables in the analysis level data from the EMMOS registry and derived variables in the OMOP CDM. Probability of overall survival over time was virtually identical with only one day difference in median survival and 95% confidence intervals identically overlapping over the period of measurement (Figure 3). Conclusions: The concordance of year of birth, drug code mapping and overall survival between the EMMOS registry and the OMOP common data model indicates the reliability of mapping potential in HONEUR, especially where auxiliary methods have been developed to handle outcomes and treatment data in a way that can be harmonized across platform datasets. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2930-2930
Author(s):  
Hedwig M Blommestein ◽  
Silvia GR Verelst ◽  
Saskia de Groot ◽  
Peter C. Huijgens ◽  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
...  

Abstract Background As with many types of cancer, treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) is characterised by sequential treatment lines consisting of innovative expensive drugs such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide. While the cost-effectiveness of single treatments has been studied, a full disease model evaluating treatments sequentially is currently lacking. Therefore, we aimed to take a look at the big picture and calculate real-world costs and effects for commonly used treatment pathways for MM. Methods We developed a patient-level simulation (PLS) model for elderly (>65) MM patients diagnosed since 2004. Real-world data (N=621) including patient and disease characteristics, treatment information and outcomes as well as resource use was obtained from the Population based HAematological Registry for Observational Studies, PHAROS. Based on this information, a patient population was simulated. Parametric survival models including patient characteristics such as age, performance status, comorbidities, laboratory values and treatment were used to predict overall survival of commonly used treatment pathways. Five treatment categories were distinguished; Melphalan/Prednison, Thalidomide based regimens, Bortezomib based regimens, Lenalidomide based regimens and Other regimens not including a novel agent. Monthly costs, per treatment per line, were calculated based on real-world data. The sensitivity of parameters was explored through sensitivity analyses. Results Mean age of our simulated population was 76 [SD: 6.25, Range 66-93] and 19 commonly used treatment pathways were observed. Average total costs from diagnosis till death ranged from $54,200 [SD: $10,990] (Melphalan/Prednison-Thalidomide-Other) to $172,346 [SD: $27,887] (Lenalidomide-Bortezomib-Other) while overall survival ranged from 29 [SD: 1.02] to 50 [SD 1.75] months for Melphalan/Prednison-Bortezomib-Lenalidomide and Lenalidomide-Bortezomib-Other, respectively. Total costs were especially induced by drug costs and inpatient hospital days. Substantial variation among the treatment pathways was observed with drug costs ranging from 7% ($3,980) of the total costs for Melphalan/Prednison-Thalidomide-Other compared to 53% ($88,058) of the total costs for Lenalidomide-Bortezomib-Thalidomide. In addition, inpatient day costs ranged from 68% ($37,113) of total costs for Melphalan/Prednison-Thalidomide-Bortezomib to 25% ($41,347) of the total costs for Lenalidomide-Bortezomib-Thalidomide. Costs per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) were between $29,060 [SD: $5,623] (Melphalan/Prednison-Thalidomide-Other) and $56,179 [SD: $9,190] (Lenalidomide-Bortezomib-Other). In addition to the 19 treatment pathways, we calculated the total costs and overall survival of treatment as observed in daily clinical practice, $79,203 [SD: $12,001] and 32 [SD: 1.33] months, respectively. Compared to real-world prescription, survival could be improved at a cost of $48,543 per QALY and $31,902 per life-year gained (Lenalidomide-Thalidomide-Bortezomib). Conclusion Real-world costs and effects of 19 treatment pathways for MM patients were calculated and revealed that real-world treatment could be improved at a cost of $48,543 per QALY and $31,902 per life-year gained. Our PLS model proved to be a reliable and robust approach to study entire treatment pathways for MM. Disclosures: Sonneveld: Jansssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5037-5037
Author(s):  
Markus Hansson ◽  
Niels Abildgaard ◽  
Anders Waage ◽  
Pekka Anttila ◽  
Anders Green ◽  
...  

Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable but treatment sensitive plasma cell cancer with an average survival of 2-5 years following diagnosis, depending on age and stage. Few studies report real-world data in MM, with limited estimations of incidence and prevalence. The Health Outcome and Understanding of Myeloma - a multi-national real-world evidence (HUMANS) study utilized real-world data from nationwide registers in Sweden and Denmark, with almost complete population coverage, to estimate the incidence and prevalence of MM. Methods This population-based, retrospective, observational, cohort study used linked, secondary data from national healthcare registers in Sweden (National Patient Register [NPR], Cancer Register [CR], Cause of Death [COD], and Prescription Drug Register [PDR]) and Denmark (NPR and CR) from 2005-2018. Patients with MM diagnosis recorded in the NPR and/or CR treated and untreated with MM specific drugs were included. The NPR in both countries is a hospital discharge register, in which patients receive an ICD-10 diagnosis each time they visit outpatient or inpatient care as the main reason for the hospital visit. The CR is manually reported by physicians when a cancer diagnosis is confirmed. In Denmark, the CR is automatically connected to the NPR, thereby obliging physicians to register whether a diagnosis is confirmed upon first NPR ICD-10 code registration of a cancer diagnosis. The Swedish CR requires active registration of a pathologist or treating hematologist to confirm the diagnosis. To determine the completeness of registration in each respective CR, treatments from the Swedish PDR and Danish NPR from 2010-2018 were used to assess incident NPR cases. Treated patients registered in the NPR, but not in the CR (NPR+/CR-) were compared with treated patients registered in both (NPR+/CR+) to assess any systematic reasons for lack of CR registration. Final inclusion criteria were determined for best estimate of incidence/prevalence of MM. Prevalence was defined as the number of non-deceased patients with MM recorded during each calendar year, as assessed from the COD register. Incidence and prevalence rates were calculated as the crude incident and prevalent cases, divided by the patients at risk (total population minus prevalent population) for each year and multiplied by 100,000. Results In Sweden, data for 13,523 unique patients with registered MM was collected. Of these, 4,563 and 874 fulfilled the inclusion criteria of NPR+/CR+ and NPR+/CR-, respectively. In the comparative analysis, NPR+/CR+ and NPR+/CR- patients had a similar frequency of treatment at a hematology department (57% of NPR+/CR+ and 53% of NPR+/CR- patients had ≥1 visit ), and had a similar share of patients with autologous stem cell transplant (22% for NPR+/CR+ and 18% for NPR+/CR-), and of MM pharmacological treatment type (53% for NPR+/CR+ and 47% for NPR+/CR- had ≥1 prescription of lenalidomide). Both university hospitals and general hospitals had a high share of NPR+/CR- patients. As no systematic difference was found for patients registered in the CR or not, we considered the estimate of incidence to be a sum of NPR+/CR+ treated AND untreated + NPR+/CR- treated. In Denmark, data for 6331 unique patients with registered MM were collected. Of these, 3,680 met inclusion criteria for NPR+/CR+ and 233 for NPR+/CR-. Patients registered as NPR+/CR- were 33% more commonly not visiting a hematology department versus NPR+/CR+. Thus, a systematic skew in CR misregistration could not be excluded. We propose the best estimate of incidence and prevalence of MM in Denmark to be patients registered in the NPR and CR (treated or untreated). In Sweden and Denmark, incidence and prevalence were higher in patients aged ≥70 versus <70 years, and in males versus females. Between the two countries, incidence and prevalence of MM were generally similar, with slightly higher prevalence in Sweden (vs Denmark) and incidence in Denmark (vs Sweden) in patients aged ≥ 70 years (Tables 1 and 2). Best estimates for validated incidences of MM were largely similar to those reported in the Swedish and Danish myeloma registries (Table 3). Conclusion The use of several nationwide registries with independent case registration, rigorous inclusion criteria, and careful consideration of criteria used to estimate incidence/prevalence, arguably provides improved estimates of incidence/prevalence compared with previous studies. Disclosures Abildgaard: Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Szilcz:Parexel International: Employment. Ma:Parexel International: Employment. Ørstavik:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG: Employment. Bent-Ennakhil:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG: Employment. Freilich:Parexel International: Employment. Gavini:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG: Employment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document