Prognostic Discrimination of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Based on the EUTOS Long Term Survival (ELTS) Score

Abstract The Sokal score for patients less than 45 years can be used for the prognostic discrimination in the pediatric population. Limited data are available regarding the utility of the EUTOS score in the pediatric population (Gurrea Salas et al, Ann Hematol 2015). Recently, a new EUTOS score, the EUTOS Long Term Survival (ELTS) score was validated in the adult population (Pfirrmann et al, Leukemia 2016). The international registry for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in children and adolescents (I-CML- Ped Study registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01281735) gave us the opportunity to test this score in this population. Aim: The aim of this analysis was the comparison of risk groups allocations and outcome between the Sokal (<45 years) score and the ELTS score in the pediatric population. Patients and Methods: As of June 1, 2016, 462 children and adolescents less than 18 years old were enrolled in the I-CML-Ped study between January 2011 and April 2016. Among them, 350 patients diagnosed with CML in chronic phase according to the ELN definition and treated with imatinib (+/- hydroxyurea or anagrelide) as first line treatment were eligible for analysis. For progression free survival (PFS) analyses, events of interest included progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis and deaths irrespective of its cause, whichever came first. For survival analyses, the event of interest was death from CML, deaths from other causes being considered as competing events, as initially designed in the ELTS score model. Estimates were compared by the log-rank test and Gray test respectively. Level of significance was 0.05. Results: The median follow up of the 350 patients was 3 years (range 1 month to 6 years). Progression and/or death (whichever came first) occurred in 23 patients. For the entire cohort of patients the 5-year PFS was 92% (95% CI: 88%-94%) and the 5-year survival accounting for CML death was 97% (95% CI: 94%-99%). Of the 308 patients allocated to low (n=54), intermediate (n=118) and high (n=136) risk groups by the Sokal (<45 years) score, events (progression and/or deaths) occurred in 5.5%, 5% and 9.5%, respectively. Estimation of the 5-year progression free survival accounting for CML death according to these 3 risk groups was 93% (95% CI:81%-98%), 94% (95% CI: 87%-97%) and 88% (95% CI: 80%-93%), respectively (p = 0.376, overall). Estimation of the 5- year survival accounting for CML death according to these 3 risk groups was 100%, 97% (95% CI: 92%-100%) and 96% (95% CI: 89%-100%), respectively, (p = 0.576, overall). Of the 308 patients allocated to low (n=199), intermediate (n=68) and high (n=41) risk groups by the ELTS score, events (progression and/or deaths) occurred in 6%, 8.8% and 24%, respectively. Differences in PFS according to these risk groups were highly significant (p < 0.0001, overall) (Figure 1). Estimation of the 5-year PFS according to these 3 risk groups was 96% (95% CI:92%-98%), 94% (95% CI: 76%-95%) and 67% (95% CI: 49%-82%), respectively. Estimation of the 5-year survival related with CML death according to these 3 risk groups was 99% (95% CI:95%-100%), 96% (95% CI: 88%-99%) and 89% (95% CI: 10%-98%), respectively (p = 0.107, overall). Conclusion: ELTS score showed better differentiation regarding progression free survival than Sokal (<45 years) score in children and adolescents with CML. However , ELTS score has failed to predict the survival accounting for CML death only. A specific prognostic score incorporating clinical, biological and molecular features is still needed for the pediatric population. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Suttorp: Novartis, Bristol Meyer Squib, Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Biondi:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Cellgene: Other: Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety (27 months) of the Biosimilar CT-P10 in Patients with Low Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-135999 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 27-28

Author(s):

Larry W Kwak ◽

Juan Manuel Sancho ◽

Seok-Goo Cho ◽

Hideyuki Nakazawa ◽

Junji Suzumiya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Time To Progression ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Travel Costs ◽

Single Transition ◽

Second Year

We assessed long-term safety and efficacy of CT-P10 and rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma (LTBFL), and following a single transition from rituximab to CT-P10. This double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled phase 3 trial randomized patients with CD20+ LTBFL to receive CT-P10 or US-sourced rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenous). Induction therapy (weekly for 4 cycles) was followed by a 2-year maintenance period for patients achieving disease control (CR, CRu, PR and SD). During the maintenance, CT-P10 or rituximab were administered every 8 weeks (6 cycles) in the first year and additional CT-P10 was administered every 8 weeks (6 cycles) in the second year. Secondary endpoints (reported here) were overall response rate during the study period, progression-free survival, time-to-progression, and overall survival. Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated over the study period. Between Nov 9, 2015 and Jan 4, 2018, 258 patients were randomised (130 CT-P10; 128 rituximab). Over the study period, 115 (88%; CT-P10) and 111 (87%; rituximab) patients achieved overall response. At a median follow-up of 29·2 months (IQR: 26·1-33·7), median progression-free survival, time-to-progression, and overall survival were not estimable. The KM estimates (95% CI) for OS at 36 months were 98% (93-99) and 97% (89-99) in the CT-P10 and rituximab groups, respectively. Corresponding values for PFS were 80% (70-87) and 68% (54-79), while results for TTP were 82% (72-88) and 68% (54-79) in the CT-P10 and rituximab groups, respectively. (Figure A. OS; Figure B. PFS and Figure C. TTP) Over the study period, 114 (88%) and 104 (81%) patients in the CT-P10 and rituximab groups, respectively, experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 14 (11%) patients in each group experienced TE-serious adverse events (TESAEs). There were no unexpected safety findings observed during the second year of the maintenance period after single transition from rituximab to CT-P10. Figure 1 Disclosures Kwak: Celltrion Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xeme Biopharma/Theratest: Other: equity; CJ Healthcare: Consultancy; Sellas Life Sciences Grp: Consultancy; Enzychem Life Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Antigenics: Other: equity; InnoLifes, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pepromene Bio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy. Sancho:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria; Gelgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Menne:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel costs, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel costs, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jurczak:Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow, Poland: Current Employment; Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Acerta: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; MeiPharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Trneny:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses. Ogura:Cellgene: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Denovo Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MejiSeika Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundi Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SymBio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TevaTakeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Pfizer: Research Funding; Donga: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirn: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; JJ: Research Funding. Lee:Celltrion, Inc.: Current Employment. Kim:Celltrion, Inc.: Current Employment. Ahn:Celltrion, Inc.: Current Employment. Buske:Roche, Janssen, Bayer, MSD: Research Funding; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche, Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, Celltrion: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Rituximab monotherapy to LTBFL patients

Download Full-text

Long-Term Outcomes of Autologous Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Prognostic Significance of Complete Response.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3126.3126 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3126-3126

Author(s):

Marta Krejci ◽

Roman Hajek ◽

Zdenek Adam ◽

Ludek Pour ◽

Lenka Zahradova ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Term Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Different Response

Abstract Abstract 3126 Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after high-dose melphalan 200mg/m2 has got an important role in the treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). The prognostic significance of achieving complete response (CR) after ASCT was cause of great debate for a long time. Some studies have shown the strong prognostic significance of achieving CR in MM, but other studies have failed to correlation between strength of the response and outcome. Aim: In this report we describe the long-term outcome of cohort 232 MM patients (pts) after ASCT with aim to establish the actual prognosis for the different response categories and to analyse other factors that might predict for long-term survival. Methods: We evaluated 232 pts with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM who received ASCT as a part of the first-line treatment between 1995 and 2005, median follow-up from ASCT was 131 months (range 61–195). Results: Following ASCT, overall response rate was 90% (202/232), 23% (52/232) of pts were in complete remission (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) was achieved in 45% of pts (100/232), partial response (PR) in 22% of pts (50/232), minimal response (MR) or stable disease (SD) in 10% of pts (22/232). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from ASCT were 30.8 and 71.9 months, respectively. Progression-free survival at 12 years after ASCT in different response categories was 41% for pts with CR, 11% for pts with VGPR and 10% for pts with PR. Overall survival at 12 years after ASCT was 51% for pts with CR, 22% for pts with VGPR and 20% for pts with PR. The achievement of CR after ASCT was independent factor for long-term survival, significance differences in OS and PFS were found between CR and non-CR groups (P under 0.001 and P under 0.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, the other factors associated with significantly better OS were ISS stage under III (P = 0.002), no presence of renal impairment (P = 0.008), age under 60 years (P = 0.001), no presence of deletion 1q21 (P = 0.029) and lenalidomide treatment in the post-transplant relapse (P = 0.002). Conclusion: The achievement of complete response after ASCT in multiple myeloma is the most important prognostic factor, even after long-term follow-up. The relapse rate is low in patients who remained in CR after 12 years from ASCT. A long-term complete remission should be a goal of treatment. Disclosures: Hajek: Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Biomarkers for Predicting Long-Term Disease Control in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Patients: The Presence of an MGUS- like Signature Is the Most Relevant Predictor

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117431 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4503-4503

Author(s):

Paula Rodriguez Otero ◽

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Joaquin Martinez Lopez ◽

Miguel-Teodoro Hernández ◽

Enrique M. Ocio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Disease Control ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Disease Free

Abstract Introduction: Disease control at five years would be a desirable endpoint for elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients; however, the percentage of cases reaching this objective as well as the biomarkers to predict it, are not well defined. Objective and design: In order to gain further insight about long-term disease control (>5 years progression-free) in elderly MM we have analyzed a homogeneous population of 435 newly-diagnosed transplant-ineligible (TNE) patients enrolled in two consecutive Spanish clinical trials (GEM2005MAS65, GEM2010MAS65), that included both proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. Results: Amongst the 435 patients included in this post-hoc study, only 18.8% remained alive and progression-free after five years of initiating treatment. Noteworthy, in these patients the overall survival (OS) rate at 10-years was 69.4%, as compared to 11.4% for those patients progressing during the first five years (p< 0.001). Baseline variables significantly associated with long-term progression free survival in the univariate analysis were younger age, ISS 1, R-ISS 1, hemoglobin ≥ 12g/dl, normal LDH, and standard-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and the presence of a monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS)-like immunophenotypic profile in the bone marrow. Complete responses (CR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity were also associated with long-term progression free survival. In the multivariate analysis, an hemoglobin level ≥12g/dl (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.47 - 4.61, p=0.001) and a MGUS-like immunophenotypic profile in the bone marrow (OR 3.33; 95% CI 1.30 - 8.54, p=0.002) were the two baseline variables significantly and independently associated with a higher probability of long-term disease-free survival. When the depth of response (including MRD) was included in the logistic regression model, Hb level ≥12g/dl (OR 2.18; p=0.010) and the MGUS-like signature (OR 4.99, p<0.001) retained their independent predictive value along with the achievement of MRD-negativity (OR 4.09, p<0.001). Focusing on the 24 patients with an MGUS-like signature (based on the automated immunophenotyping analysis of the relative frequency of BM plasma cells (PCs) plus the percentage of clonal and normal PCs within the whole BM PC compartment), 50% percent of these patients displayed a long-term disease-free survival, as compared to only 17.5% of the remaining MM patients. The median OS for patients with MGUS-like signature was 90.2 months as compared to 62.6 for the MM-like patients. Most MGUS-like patients (90.5%) achieved a favorable response (10 complete response (CR) and 9 very good partial response (VGPR)). No differences in outcome were observed between VGPR and CR cases (p-value for OS 0.87) among MGUS-like patients. Conclusions: This study revealed that despite the usage of former novel agents, the probability of disease control at five years is still restricted to a small fraction (18.8%) of transplant-ineligible patients that achieve remarkable rates of long-term OS. Here, we identify that the combination of three biomarkers (normal Hb, MGUS-Like signature and MRD negativity) can help todefine elderly MM patients achieving long-term disease control. Our results highlight the presence of an MGUS-like signature in the bone marrow at diagnoses as the most powerful predictor for long-term disease free survival, and could be incorporated in clinical practice in order toimprove the prognostic information given to our patients. Disclosures Rodriguez Otero: Clínica Universidad de Navarra: Employment; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Mateos:Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martinez Lopez:Janssen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ocio:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Puig:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Oriol:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bladé:Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. San-Miguel:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Progression-Free Survival: An Important Prognostic Marker for Long-Term Survival of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases ◽

10.4046/trd.2014.76.5.218 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 76 (5) ◽

pp. 218 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Myoung-Rin Park ◽

Yeon-Hee Park ◽

Jae-Woo Choi ◽

Dong-Il Park ◽

Chae-Uk Chung ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Prognostic Marker ◽

Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Small Cell ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Term Survival ◽

Free Survival

Download Full-text

Long-Term Survival Benefit of Eculizumab Treatment in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: Data from the International PNH Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153560 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2188-2188

Author(s):

Louis Terriou ◽

Christopher J. Patriquin ◽

Morag Griffin ◽

Jong Wook Lee ◽

Philippe Gustovic ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rare Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Survival Probability ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Term Survival ◽

Treatment Status ◽

History Of ◽

Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Eculizumab, the first C5 inhibitor approved for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), transformed PNH treatment by improving survival to that of an age- and sex- matched general population. Previous analyses demonstrating the survival benefit of eculizumab in patients with PNH leveraged historical data and were limited by small patient numbers and short follow-up durations; few evaluated survival of patients receiving eculizumab compared with untreated patients. The objective of the current analysis was to describe the baseline characteristics and overall survival of a large international cohort of eculizumab-treated patients compared with a contemporaneous untreated cohort using data from the prospective, observational International PNH Registry (NCT01374360). Methods Data from patients enrolled in the Registry after March 16, 2007 with complete information for birth date, sex, enrollment date, and treatment status were included (database cut-off, April 12, 2021). Ever-treated patients were those who received eculizumab for a minimum treatment period of 35 days while enrolled in the Registry; never-treated patients did not receive eculizumab at any time before or during Registry participation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards that incorporated the following parameters at baseline as covariates: treatment status, presence of high disease activity (HDA), age, sex, history of bone marrow failure (BMF), history of thrombotic events (TE), transfusion dependence, and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m 2. HDA was defined as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ratio ≥1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and ≥1 of the following: history of major adverse vascular events (including TE); anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL), or physician-documented abdominal pain, dyspnea, dysphagia, fatigue, hemoglobinuria, or erectile dysfunction at any time before and including baseline. Baseline was defined as the date of eculizumab treatment initiation (ever-treated patients) or date of Registry enrollment (never-treated patients). Survival time was analyzed using a left-truncation approach that mapped time in patients' survival based on disease start date, defined as the earliest date of first-reported PNH diagnosis, PNH symptom, or first consistent flow cytometry result. Results Baseline characteristics of the 4627 patients included in the analysis (mean [SD] age at disease start, 40.2 [18.71] years; 53% female; 75% white) were comparable between the ever-treated and never-treated groups (n=1892 and n=2735, respectively). Compared with never-treated patients, more ever-treated patients had LDH ≥1.5 × ULN (90% vs 35%), and fewer had <10% PNH granulocytes (3% vs 57%) or history of BMF (45% vs 76%). The univariate Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in ever-treated vs never-treated patients was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.39-0.60; P<0.0001), indicating a 52% increase in survival in the treated group (Table). Among ever-treated patients, those with HDA at baseline experienced the largest reduction in mortality risk (HR [95% CI], 0.46 [0.33-0.64]; n=174); however, decreased mortality was also evident in ever-treated patients without HDA (HR, 0.65 [0.39-1.10]; n=212) or with unknown HDA status (HR, 0.50 [0.32-0.76; n=120) at baseline. Overall survival probability by treatment status was consistently greater in ever-treated vs never-treated patients through 20 years of follow-up; survival probability at 20 years was 82% (ever-treated) vs 69% (never-treated). Although long-term survival probability was greatest throughout follow-up in ever-treated patients with HDA at baseline, increased survival among ever-treated patients was evident in all 3 HDA status groups (Figure). Conclusion In this analysis of Registry data, treatment with the C5 inhibitor eculizumab improved patient survival compared with a never-treated cohort at a comparable time point in their disease course. Covariates were assessed at baseline only and competing risks and time on treatment were not controlled for, which are potential limitations. Survival benefits conferred by eculizumab treatment were observed regardless of HDA status at baseline, were more pronounced in treated patients with HDA vs those without HDA, and were maintained through 2 decades of real-world follow-up. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Terriou: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patriquin: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Biocryst: Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria. Griffin: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Other: Educational grant support. Lee: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gustovic: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Current Employment. Patel: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Current Employment. Szer: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Prevail Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Intraoperative radiotherapy to treat newly diagnosed solitary brain metastasis: initial experience and long-term outcomes

Journal of Neurosurgery ◽

10.3171/2014.11.jns1449 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 122 (4) ◽

pp. 825-832 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Robert J. Weil ◽

Gaurav G. Mavinkurve ◽

Samuel T. Chao ◽

Michael A. Vogelbaum ◽

John H. Suh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Brain Metastasis ◽

Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Patient Treatment ◽

Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Term Survival ◽

Solitary Brain Metastasis ◽

Free Survival

OBJECT The authors assessed the feasibility of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) using a portable radiation source to treat newly diagnosed, surgically resected, solitary brain metastasis (BrM). METHODS In a nonrandomized prospective study, 23 patients with histologically confirmed BrM were treated with an Intrabeam device that delivered 14 Gy to a 2-mm depth to the resection cavity during surgery. RESULTS In a 5-year minimum follow-up period, progression-free survival from the time of surgery with simultaneous IORT averaged (± SD) 22 ± 33 months (range 1–96 months), with survival from the time of BrM treatment with surgery+IORT of 30 ± 32 months (range 1–96 months) and overall survival from the time of first cancer diagnosis of 71 ± 64 months (range 4–197 months). For the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), patients with a score of 1.5–2.0 (n = 12) had an average posttreatment survival of 21 ± 26 months (range 1–96 months), those with a score of 2.5–3.0 (n = 7) had an average posttreatment survival of 52 ± 40 months (range 5–94 months), and those with a score of 3.5–4.0 (n = 4) had an average posttreatment survival of 17 ± 12 months (range 4–28 months). A BrM at the treatment site recurred in 7 patients 9 ± 6 months posttreatment, and 5 patients had new but distant BrM 17 ± 3 months after surgery+IORT. Six patients later received whole-brain radiation therapy, 7 patients received radiosurgery, and 2 patients received both treatments. The median Karnofsky Performance Scale scores before and 1 and 3 months after surgery were 80, 90, and 90, respectively; at the time of this writing, 3 patients remain alive with a CNS progression-free survival of > 90 months without additional BrM treatment. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of resection combined with IORT at a dose of 14 Gy to a 2-mm peripheral margin to treat a solitary BrM. Local control, distant control, and long-term survival were comparable to those of other commonly used modalities. Surgery combined with IORT seems to be a potential adjunct to patient treatment for CNS involvement by systemic cancer.

Download Full-text

ABVD Versus Escalated Beacopp in Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results from a Retrospective, Multicenter European Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128198 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1565-1565 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Patrizia Mondello ◽

Irene Dogliotti ◽

Jan-Paul Bohn ◽

Federica Cavallo ◽

Simone Ferrero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

High Risk Patients ◽

Risk Patients

Purpose: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease even in advanced-stage, with >90% of long-term survivors. Currently, the standard of care is ABVD (doxorubicin, etoposide, vinblastine and dacarbazine), as it is less toxic and as effective as other more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Alternatively, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone) has been proposed as front-line intensified regimen with a better initial disease control and prolonged time to relapse when compared to ABVD. However, this advantage is associated with higher rates of severe hematologic toxicity, treatment-related deaths, secondary neoplasms and infertility. To date, the debate regarding which regimen should be preferred as first line for advanced-stage HL is still ongoing. To shed some light on this open question we compared efficacy and safety of both regimens in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: From October 2009 to October 2018, patients with HL stage III-IV treated with either ABVD or BEACOPP escalated (BEACOPPesc) were retrospectively assessed in 7 European cancer centers. Results: A total of 372 consecutive patients were included in the study. One-hundred and ten patients were treated with BEACOPPesc and 262 with ABVD. The baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly, except for a higher rate of high-risk patients in the BEACOPPesc group in contrast to the ABVD one (47% vs 18%; p= 0.003). Complete response rate (CR) assessed by PET imaging at the end of the second cycle was 67% and 78% for the ABVD and BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.003), respectively. Thirteen patients of the ABVD group achieved stable disease (SD) and 6 had a progression disease (PD). On the other hand, 4 of the patients in the BEACOPPesc group progressed, another 2 interrupted therapy because life-threatening toxicity. At the end of the therapy, CR was 76% in the ABVD group and 85% in the BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.01). A total of 20% patients in the ABVD group and 14% patients in the BEACOPPesc group received consolidation radiotherapy on the mediastinal mass at the dose of 30Gy. After radiotherapy, the number of patients with CR increased to 79% and 87% in the two groups (p= 0.041), respectively. Thirty-nine patients (35%) in the BEACOPPesc group required dose reduction of chemotherapy due to toxicity compared to 12 patients (5%; p= <0.001) in the ABVD group. Overall, the rate of severe toxicities was higher in the BEACOPPesc group in comparison with the ABVD cohort. In particular, there was a significant increased frequency of acute grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (neutropenia 61% vs 24%; anemia 29% vs 4%; thrombocytopenia 29% vs 3%), febrile neutropenia (29% vs 3%), severe infections (18% vs 3%). Myeloid growth factors were administered to 85% and 59% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD group. Blood transfusions were required in 51% and 6% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD cohort. Progression during or shortly after treatment occurred in 5 patients in the BEACOPPesc group (4%) and in 16 patients in the ABVD group (6%; p= 0.62). Among the 96 patients who achieved a CR after BEACOPPesc and radiotherapy, 8 relapsed (8%), compared to 29 of 208 patients in the ABVD group (14%; p= 0.04). At a median follow-up period of 5 years, no statistical difference in progression free survival (PFS; p=0.11) and event-free survival (EFS; p=0.22) was observed between the BEACOPPesc and ABVD cohorts. Similarly, overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups (p=0.14). The baseline international prognostic score (IPS <3 vs ≥ 3) significantly influenced the EFS with an advantage for the high-risk group treated with BEACOPPesc (Figure 1A; p=0.03), but not the PFS (Figure 1B; p=0.06) and OS (Figure 1C; p=0.14). During the follow-up period, in the BEACOPPesc group one patient developed myelodysplasia and one acute leukemia. Second solid tumors developed in one patient in the ABVD group (lung cancer) and one in BEACOPPesc group (breast cancer). Conclusion: We confirm that the ABVD regimen is an effective and less toxic therapeutic option for advanced-stage HL. Although BEACOPP results in better initial tumor control especially in high-risk patients, the long-term outcome remains similar between the two regimens. Disclosures Ferrero: EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Martinelli:BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Willenbacher:European Commission: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Myelom- und Lymphomselbsthilfe Österreich: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Science: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IQVIA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; oncotyrol: Employment, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Fujimoto: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tirol Program: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Progressive but Previously Untreated CLL Patients with Greater Array CGH Complexity Exhibit A Less Durable Response to Chemoimmunotherapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2406.2406 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2406-2406

Author(s):

Neil E. Kay ◽

Jeanette Eckel Passow ◽

Esteban Braggio ◽

Scott Van Wier ◽

Tait Shanafelt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcome ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Copy Number ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Genomic Complexity ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Gains And Losses

Abstract Abstract 2406 The outcome for a given CLL patient is difficult to predict. While there are promising models, they require collation of multiple clinical and laboratory parameters, and it remains to be seen whether they will apply to typical CLL patients in the community. To further dissect out explanations for this dramatic clinical heterogeneity, we sought to understand genomic complexity of clonal B-cells as a possible explanation of clinical variability with specific application to genomic complexity as a predictor of therapeutic response and clinical outcome in CLL. Thus we wished to identified global gains and losses of genetic material in order to define copy-number abnormalities (CNA) in 48 clinically progressive CLL patients who were about to be treated on a chemoimmunotherapy protocol. This protocol was previously reported by us (Blood. 109:2007) and had an induction phase with pentostatin (2 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and rituximab (375 mg/m2) given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles and then responding patients were followed ever three months until relapse. In order to estimate CNA, we employed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) using a one-million oligonucleotide probe array format on the leukemic B-cells from the 48 patients entering this trial. In those same patients, the aCGH data were compared to a) FISH detecxtable data using a panel for the common recurring genetic defects seen in CLL and b) to their clinical outcome on this trial. With aCGH we found that 288 CNA were identified (median of 4 per patient; range 0–32) of which 215 were deletions and 73 were gains. The aCGH method identified most of the FISH detected abnormalities with a complete concordance for 17p13.1- deletion (17p-) between aCGH and FISH. We also identified chromosomal gain or loss in ≥6% of the patients on chromosomes 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 17. We found that CLL patients with ≥15 CNA had a significantly worse progression free survival (PFS) than patients with <15 CNA (p=0.004)(figure). Patients with ≥15 CNA also had a shorter duration of response than those with <15 CNA (p=0.0726). Of interest, more complex genomic features were found both in patients with a 17p13.1 deletion and in more favorable genetic subtypes such as 13q14.1. Thus, for 5 patients with >15 CNAs the following FISH patterns were seen: +12/13q14.1-x1/13q14.1 -x2, 13q14.1 ×1 (n=2), and 17p13.1 (n=2). In addition, a 17p- by FISH was positively associated with the number of CNA and total deletion size. The odds of having an overall response decreased by 28% (95% CI: 5–55%; p=0.015) with each additional CNA for the 17p13.1- patients. In addition to defining genomic complexity as the total number of CNA for each patient, we also defined complexity as the sum of the lengths of all interstitial chromosomal gains and losses. When defined as the total size of chromosomal gains or losses, genomic complexity was significantly associated with 17p13.1 and worse overall clinical response. In summary, this analysis utilized the global assessment of copy number abnormalities using a high-resolution aCGH platform for clinically progressive CLL patients prior to initiation of their treatment. One outcome was that we found higher genomic complexity was associated with shorter progression-free survival, reduced duration of response and predicted a poor response to treatment. In addition since we did find genomic complexity in more traditionally favorable FISH categories, such as 13q14.1 type defects, this may explain why some of the latter patients do not fare as well as might be expected even with aggressive chemoimmunotherapy approaches. This study adds information on the association between inferior trial response and increasing genetic complexity as CLL progresses. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Pentostatin. Kipps: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Memgen: Research Funding; Igenica: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding; Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Tandem Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplants (AuHCT) with or without Maintenance Therapy (auto-auto) Versus Single AuHCT Followed by HLA Matched Sibling Non- Myeloablative Allogeneic HCT (auto-allo) for Patients with Standard Risk (SR) Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results From the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 0102 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.41.41 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 41-41 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Amrita Krishnan ◽

Marcelo C Pasquini ◽

Marian Ewell ◽

Edward A. Stadtmauer ◽

Edwin P Alyea ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Response Rates ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Matched Sibling

Abstract Abstract 41 AuHCT improves survival in patients with MM, but disease relapse and progression remain a challenge. Both tandem AuHCT and post transplant maintenance therapy improve progression-free survival (PFS). Alternatively, allogeneic HCT has the potential to reduce disease progression through a graft-versus-myeloma effect. Use of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens allows the latter approach to be used with reduced treatment-related mortality (TRM). BMT CTN 0102 was a multicenter phase III trial that biologically assigned patients with MM to auto-auto using melphalan 200mg/m2 (MEL 200) conditioning or an auto-allo approach using MEL 200 followed by alloHCT with 2 Gy total body irradiation. Graft-versus-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression free survival (PFS). Between December 2003 and March 2007, 710 patients from 43 US centers were enrolled. Patients were assigned to the auto-allo arm based on availability of an HLA-matched sibling donor at time of enrollment. Patients in the auto-auto arm were further randomized to thalidomide and dexamethasone (Thal-Dex) for 1 year or observation (obs). Among 625 patients with SR MM (absence of chromosome 13 deletion by metaphase karyotyping and β-2 microglobulin ≤ 4mg/L), 436 were assigned to auto-auto (217 Thal-Dex, 219 obs) and 189 to auto-allo. Compliance with Thal-Dex was poor, with 84% of patients not completing prescribed therapy. PFS and overall survival (OS) between the Thal-Dex and obs cohorts were equal and these arms were pooled for the primary analysis. The auto-auto and auto-allo groups differed in age (median 55y vs. 52y, p =0.01) and time between first and second transplants (median 98d vs 105d, p =0.02), but were otherwise balanced. Complete and near complete (CR+nCR) response rates at study entry were 24% for both groups. Three-year PFS was 46% and 43% (p=0.67) and 3-year OS was 80% and 77 % (p=0.19) for the auto-auto and auto-allo groups, respectively. Corresponding probabilities for 3-year progression/relapse were 50% and 46% (p=0.8) and for 3-year TRM were 4% and 11% (p=0.04). Among auto-allo patients, probabilities of grade III-IV acute and chronic GVHD were 9% and 47%, respectively. Eighty-two percent of patients in each arm received the assigned second transplant. Among 522 patients who received their second transplant, 3-year PFS was 47% and 44% (p=0.89) with auto-auto and auto-allo, respectively. Disease response rates at day 56 after second HCT were: 50% very good partial response (VGPR) or better and 40% CR+nCR in the auto-auto group; and 49% (VGPR or better, p=0.8) and 48% (CR+nCR,p=0.12) in the auto-allo group. In conclusion, there were no differences in 3-year PFS and OS between patients receiving auto-auto or auto-allo. Potential benefits of graft-versus-myeloma to reduce disease progression or relapse were offset by increased TRM. Thal-Dex maintenance did not improve PFS or OS, likely due to poor tolerability of this regimen. At 3 years, the auto-allo approach for SR MM had no added benefit compared to tandem AuHCT. Disclosures: Krishnan: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Stadtmauer:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Comenzo:Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Elan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genzyme: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho: Research Funding. Hari:Celgene: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Vesole:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Giralt:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Characteristics Of Multiple Myeloma Patients With 6-Year Or Longer Progression-Free Survival After a Single Autologous Transplant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3366.3366 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3366-3366 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Kehinde U.A. Adekola ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

Nina Shah ◽

Sai Ravi Pingali ◽

Simrit Parmar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Autologous Transplant ◽

Preparative Regimen

Background High dose chemotherapy followed by an autologous stem cell transplant (auto-HCT) is considered standard of care in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). In a recent randomized trial, median progression free survival (PFS) after auto-HCT, with or without maintenance therapy was 46 and 27 months, respectively (McCarthy P et al. NEJM 2012). However, about 15% of patients are reported to have much longer PFS (Pineda-Roman M et al. Cancer 2008). Here we tried to identify the factors that may predict a long PFS after auto-HCT. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who received an auto-HCT for MM between January 2000 and March 2007. A total of 1135 patients underwent an auto-HCT during this period, and 194 patients (17%) had a minimum PFS of 72 months or longer after a single auto-HCT. The primary objective was to determine the variables associated with a long PFS and overall survival (OS). Results Patient characteristics and outcomes are shown in the attached Table. The median age at auto-HCT was 56 years, and the median time from diagnosis to auto-HCT was 7.5 months. Twenty-three (13%) patients had ≥ 10% plasma cells in the bone marrow at auto-HCT and only 9 patients (4.8%) had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. One-hundred and fifty (77%) patients received induction therapy containing either an immunomodulatory (IMiD) agent or a proteasome inhibitor (PI). At the time of the auto-HSCT, only 13 (6.7%) patients were in CR and 38 (19.6%) were CR or VGPR after induction therapy (Table). One-hundred and sixty three (84%) patients received mephalan alone as conditioning regimen. Eighty-one (42%) patients received post auto-HCT maintenance. Eighty (41%) patients achieved a CR, while 104 (54%) achieved CR + VGPR after auto-HCT. Six patients (3.1%) developed a second primary malignancy post- autologous transplant. After a median follow-up of 95.4 months, median PFS was 97.3 months and median OS has not been reached. The 10-year PFS and OS were 41% and 73% respectively. Use of melphalan alone as preparative regimen was associated with a longer PFS and OS (p=0.004 and 0.004, respectively). Achievement of CR after auto-HCT was associated with a longer PFS only (p=0.001), and the use of IMiD or a PI as induction was associated with a longer OS (p=0.01). Conclusion Approximately 17% patients achieved a median PFS of 6 years or longer after a single auto-HCT. The long PFS in this cohort may be associated with younger age, low incidence of HR cytogenetics, use of an IMiD or PI as induction therapy, relatively low disease burden at auto-HCT, transplant from the year 2000 onwards, achievement of CR in >40% and the use of melphalan alone as preparative regimen. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Qazilbash:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text