scholarly journals Markers of neutrophil extracellular traps predict adverse outcome in community-acquired pneumonia: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1701389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahim Ebrahimi ◽  
Stavros Giaglis ◽  
Sinuhe Hahn ◽  
Claudine A. Blum ◽  
Christine Baumgartner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Neutrophil Extracellular Traps ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Extracellular Traps ◽  
Clinical Instability ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Clinical Stability

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are a hallmark of the immune response in inflammatory diseases. However, the role of NETs in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is unknown. This study aims to characterise the impact of NETs on clinical outcomes in pneumonia.This is a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled, multicentre trial. Patients with CAP were randomly assigned to either 50 mg prednisone or placebo for 7 days. The primary end-point was time to clinical stability; main secondary end-points were length of hospital stay and mortality.In total, 310 patients were included in the analysis. Levels of cell-free nucleosomes as surrogate markers of NETosis were significantly increased at admission and declined over 7 days. NETs were significantly associated with reduced hazards of clinical stability and hospital discharge in multivariate adjusted analyses. Moreover, NETs were associated with a 3.8-fold increased adjusted odds ratio of 30-day mortality. Prednisone treatment modified circulatory NET levels and was associated with beneficial outcome.CAP is accompanied by pronounced NET formation. Patients with elevated serum NET markers were at higher risk for clinical instability, prolonged length of hospital stay and 30-day all-cause mortality. NETs represent a novel marker for outcome and a possible target for adjunct treatments of pneumonia.

scholarly journals Fibroblast growth factor 21 predicts outcome in community-acquired pneumonia: secondary analysis of two randomised controlled trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 1800973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahim Ebrahimi ◽  
Carole Wolffenbuttel ◽  
Claudine A. Blum ◽  
Christine Baumgartner ◽  
Beat Mueller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Fibroblast Growth ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Clinical Stability

Acute systemic inflammatory conditions are accompanied by profound alterations of metabolism. However, the role of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), a recently identified central regulator of metabolism, is largely unknown in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This study aims to characterise the pattern of FGF21 in pneumonia and associations with disease severity and outcome.This is a secondary analysis of two independent multicentre randomised controlled trials in patients presenting to the emergency department with CAP. Primary and secondary efficacy parameters included 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, time to clinical stability and duration of antibiotic treatment.A total of 509 patients were included in the analysis. FGF21 levels at admission strongly correlated with disease severity, as measured by the Pneumonia Severity Index. Increased levels of FGF21 were associated with prolonged time to clinical stability, antibiotic treatment and hospitalisation. FGF21 levels at admission were significantly higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors, yielding a 1.61-fold increased adjusted odds ratio of 30-day mortality (95% CI 1.21–2.14; p=0.001). Moreover, FGF21 was found to identify patients for 30-day mortality with superior discriminative power compared with routine diagnostic markers.Moderate-to-severe CAP patients with higher levels of FGF21 were at increased risk for clinical instability, prolonged hospitalisation and 30-day all-cause mortality.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention on quality of life, caregiver burden and length of hospital stay: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongyi Chen ◽  
Zhaosheng Ding ◽  
Caixia Chen ◽  
Yangfan Sun ◽  
Yuyu Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) interventions can improve functional ability and reduce mortality in older adults, but the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, caregiver burden, and length of hospital stay remains unclear. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, length of hospital stay, and caregiver burden in older adults by conducting meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for papers published before February 29, 2020, based on inclusion criteria. Standardised mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias analyses were also conducted. Results A total of 28 RCTs were included. Overall, the intervention components common in different CGA intervention models were interdisciplinary assessments and team meetings. Meta-analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life of older people (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.21; P = 0.009) compared to usual care, and subgroup analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life only in participants’ age > 80 years and at follow-up ≤3 months. The change value of quality of life in the CGA intervention group was better than that in the usual care group on six dimensions of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Also, compared to usual care, the CGA intervention reduced the caregiver burden (SMD = − 0.56; 95% CI = − 0.97 to − 0.15, P = 0.007), but had no significant effect on the length of hospital stay. Conclusions CGA intervention was effective in improving the quality of life and reducing caregiver burden, but did not affect the length of hospital stay. It is recommended that future studies apply the SF-36 to evaluate the impact of CGA interventions on the quality of life and provide supportive strategies for caregivers as an essential part of the CGA intervention, to find additional benefits of CGA interventions.

565 POST-OPERATIVE WEIGHT LOSS AND OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Khaw ◽  
S Munro ◽  
J Sturrock ◽  
H Jaretzke ◽  
S Kamarajah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Failure To Thrive ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Postoperative Weight Loss ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract   Oesophageal cancer is the 11th most common cancer worldwide, with oesophagectomy remaining the mainstay curative treatment, despite significant associated morbidity and mortality. Postoperative weight loss remains a significant problem and is directly correlated to poor prognosis. Measures such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme and intraoperative jejunostomy feed have looked to tackle this. This study investigates the impact of these on mortality, length of hospital stay and postoperative weight loss. Methods Patients undergoing oesophagectomy between January 1st 2012—December 2014 and 28th October 2015–December 31st 2019 in a national tertiary oesophagogastric unit were included retrospectively. Variables measured included comorbidities, operation, histopathology, weights (pre- and post-operatively), length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and mortality. Pre-operative body weight was measured at elective admission, and further weights were identified from a prospectively maintained database, during further clinic appointments. Other data was collected through patient notes. Results 594 patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 65.9 years (13–65). Majority of cases were adenocarcinoma (63.3%), with varying stages of disease (TX-4, NX-3). Benign pathology accounted for 8.75% of cases. Mean weight loss post-oesophagectomy exceeded 10% at 6 months (SD 14.49). Majority (60.1%) of patients were discharged with feeding jejunostomy, and 5.22% of these required this feed to be restarted post-discharge. Length of stay was mean 16.5 days (SD 22.3). Complications occurred in 68.9% of patients, of which 13.8% were infection driven. Mortality occurred in 26.6% of patients, with 1.83% during hospital admission. 30-day mortality rate was 1.39%. Conclusion Failure to thrive and prolonged weight-loss following oesophagectomy can contribute to poor recovery, with associated complications and poor outcomes, including increased length of stay and mortality. Further analysis of data to investigate association between weight loss and poor outcomes for oesophagectomy patients will allow for personalised treatment of high-risk patients, in conjunction with members of the multidisciplinary team, including dieticians.

Are neutrophil extracellular traps the link for the cross-talk between periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis physiopathology?

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sicília Rezende Oliveira ◽  
José Alcides A de Arruda ◽  
Ayda Henriques Schneider ◽  
Valessa Florindo Carvalho ◽  
Caio Machado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cross Talk ◽  
Neutrophil Extracellular Traps ◽  
Periodontal Therapy ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Extracellular Traps ◽  
Early Ra ◽  
The Cross ◽  
High Concentrations ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objectives Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) play a role in the pathogenesis of periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, it remains poorly understood whether NETs participate in the cross-talk between periodontitis and RA. Herein, we investigated the production of NETs in individuals with periodontitis and RA and its association with clinical parameters. The impact of periodontal therapy on RA and NET release was also assessed. Methods The concentration of NETs and cytokines was determined in the saliva and plasma of individuals with early RA (n = 24), established RA (n = 64), and individuals without RA (n = 76). The influence of periodontitis on the production of NETs and cytokines was also evaluated. Results Individuals with early RA had a higher concentration of NETs in saliva and plasma than individuals with established RA or without RA. Periodontitis resulted in an increase in the concentration of NETs of groups of individuals without RA and with early RA. The proportion of individuals with high concentrations of IL-6, IL-10 and GM-CSF was higher among individuals with periodontitis than among individuals without periodontitis. The concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-17/IL-25, and IL-28A were particularly high in individuals with early RA. Worse periodontal clinical parameters, RA onset and RA activity were significantly associated with circulating NETs. Periodontal therapy was associated with a reduction in the concentration of NETs and inflammatory cytokines and amelioration in periodontitis and RA. Conclusion This study reveals that NETs are a possible link between periodontitis and RA, with periodontal therapy resulting in a dramatic switch in circulating NET levels.

scholarly journals Influence of Weekday of Admission and Level of Distress on Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Brunner ◽  
André Meichtry ◽  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Reinhard Imoberdorf ◽  
David Gisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Linear Model ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complex Problem ◽  
Interdisciplinary Management ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is often a complex problem requiring interdisciplinary management to address patients’ multidimensional needs. The inpatient care for patients with LBP in primary care hospitals is a challenge. In this setting, interdisciplinary LBP management is often unavailable during the weekend. Delays in therapeutic procedures may result in prolonged length of hospital stay (LoS). The impact of delays on LoS might be strongest in patients reporting high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigates which influence the weekday of admission and distress have on LoS of inpatients with LBP.MethodsRetrospective cohort study conducted between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2020. ANOVA was used to test the hypothesized difference in mean effects of the weekday of admission on LoS. Further, a linear model was fitted for LoS with distress, categorical weekday of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday), and their interactions.ResultsWe identified 173 patients with LBP. Mean LoS was 7.8 days (SD=5.59). Patients admitted on Friday (mean LoS=10.3) and Saturday (LoS=10.6) had longer stays but not those admitted on Sunday (LoS=7.1). Analysis of the weekday effect (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday) showed that admission on Friday or Saturday was associated with significant increase in LoS compared to admission on other weekdays (t=3.43, p=<0.001). 101 patients (58%) returned questionnaires, and complete data on distress was available from 86 patients (49%). According to a linear model for LoS, the effect of distress on LoS was significantly modified (t=2.51, p=0.014) by dichotomic weekdays of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday).ConclusionsPatients with LBP are hospitalized significantly longer if they have to wait more than two days for interdisciplinary LBP management. This particularly affects patients reporting high distress. Our study provides a platform to further explore whether interdisciplinary LBP management addressing patients’ multidimensional needs reduces LoS in primary care hospitals.

scholarly journals P129 THORACIC VS. ABDOMINAL APPROACHES FOR DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA REPAIR: A NATIONWIDE STUDY OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Carolina Quiroga Centeno ◽  
Orlando Navas ◽  
Juan Paulo Serrano ◽  
Sergio Alejandro Gómez Ochoa
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Diaphragmatic Hernia ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Abdominal Repair ◽  
Lower Health ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aim “To compare the outcomes of different surgical approaches for diaphragmatic hernia (DH) repair.” Material and Methods “Adult patients with a principal admitting diagnosis of uncomplicated DH registered in the National Inpatient Sample in the period 2010-2015 were included. Patients with obstruction, gangrene, or congenital hernias were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of complications, length of stay, and hospital charges. A multivariate logistic regression model adjusted by age, sex, elective admission, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics was used to analyze the impact of the surgical approach on the evaluated outcomes.” Results “A total of 14910 patients with DH were included (median age 65 years, 74% women). Abdominal approaches were the most commonly performed (78.9% laparoscopy and 13.6% open). Patients that underwent open abdominal and thoracic repairs had a higher risk of complications (sepsis, pneumonia, surgical site infection, prolonged postoperative ileus, and acute myocardial infarction), longer hospital stay, higher total hospital costs, and a significantly higher risk of mortality (OR 2.62. 95% CI 1.59-4.30 and OR 4.60; 95% CI 2.37-8.91, respectively) compared to patients that underwent laparoscopic abdominal repair. Individuals whose DH repair was performed through thoracoscopy had a similar mortality risk to those who underwent laparoscopic abdominal repair (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.11-6.43).” Conclusions “Nowadays, laparoscopy has become the most used approach for DH repair. In the present cohort, it was associated with better outcomes in terms of complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality, as well as lower health costs. Additional studies assessing hernia characteristics are required to validate this result.”

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document