Community-acquired bacteraemia in COVID-19 in comparison to influenza A and influenza B: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the Netherlands it was noticed that very few blood cultures from COVID-19 patients turned positive with clinically relevant bacteria. This was particularly evident in comparison to the number of positive blood cultures during previous seasonal epidemics of influenza. This observation raised questions about the occurrence and causative microorganisms of bacteraemia in COVID-19 patients, especially in the perspective of the widely reported overuse of antibiotics and the rising rate of antibiotic resistance. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on blood culture results in influenza A, influenza B and COVID-19 patients presenting to two hospitals in the Netherlands. Our main outcome consisted of the percentage of positive blood cultures. The percentage of clinically relevant blood cultures, isolated bacteria and 30-day all-cause mortality served as our secondary outcomes. Results A total of 1331 viral episodes were analysed in 1324 patients. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.47) in overall occurrence of blood culture positivity in COVID-19 patients (9.0, 95% CI 6.8–11.1) in comparison to influenza A (11.4, 95% CI 7.9–14.8) and influenza B patients (10.4, 95% CI 7.1–13.7,). After correcting for the high rate of contamination, the occurrence of clinically relevant bacteraemia in COVID-19 patients amounted to 1.0% (95% CI 0.3–1.8), which was statistically significantly lower (p = 0.04) compared to influenza A patients (4.0, 95% CI 1.9–6.1) and influenza B patients (3.0, 95% CI 1.2–4.9). The most frequently identified bacterial isolates in COVID-19 patients were Escherichia coli (n = 2) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 2). The overall 30-day all-cause mortality for COVID-19 patients was 28.3% (95% CI 24.9–31.7), which was statistically significantly higher (p = <.001) when compared to patients with influenza A (7.1, 95% CI 4.3–9.9) and patients with influenza B (6.4, 95% CI 3.8–9.1). Conclusions We report a very low occurrence of community-acquired bacteraemia amongst COVID-19 patients in comparison to influenza patients. These results reinforce current clinical guidelines on antibiotic management in COVID-19, which only advise utilization of antibiotics when a bacterial co-infection is suspected.

Download Full-text

Risk Factors for Positive Follow-Up Blood Cultures in Gram-Negative Bacilli Bacteremia: Implications for Selecting Who Needs Follow-Up Blood Cultures

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa110 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (4) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hayato Mitaka ◽

Tessa Gomez ◽

Young Im Lee ◽

David C Perlman

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Blood Culture ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽

Blood Cultures ◽

Gram Negative ◽

Intravascular Devices

Abstract Background The value of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) to document clearance of bacteremia due to Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) has not been well established. Although previous studies suggested that the yield of FUBCs for GNB bacteremia is low, it remains to be elucidated for whom FUBC may be beneficial and for whom it is unnecessary. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed at 4 acute care hospitals to identify risk factors for positive FUBCs with GNB bacteremia and to better guide clinicians’ decisions as to which patients may or may not benefit from FUBCs. Participants included adult patients with GNB bacteremia who had FUBCs and were admitted between January 2017 and December 2018. The primary outcomes were the factors associated with positive FUBCs and the yield of FUBCs with and without the factors. Results Of 306 patients with GNB bacteremia who had FUBCs, 9.2% (95% confidence interval, 6.2%–13.0%) had the same GNB in FUBCs. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, intravascular device, and bacteremia due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase or carbapenemase-producing organism were identified as independent predictors of positive FUBCs with GNB bacteremia. Approximately 7 FUBCs and 30 FUBCs were needed for patients with ≥1 or no risk factors, respectively, to yield 1 positive result. SummaryThis multi-site retrospective cohort study found that among patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bacteremia, having ESRD on hemodialysis, intravascular devices, or bacteremia due to multi-drug resistant GNB were each independently associated with having a positive follow-up blood culture. Conclusions Follow-up blood culture may not be necessary for all patients with GNB bacteremia and has the highest yield in patients with 1 or more risk factors.

Download Full-text

Dual versus triple therapy for uncomplicated brucellosis: A retrospective cohort study

The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries ◽

10.3855/jidc.12741 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 14 (12) ◽

pp. 1380-1386

Author(s):

Rawan O Al-Madfaa ◽

Mai A Alalawi ◽

Lana O Basudan ◽

Shahad F Alhejaili ◽

Khalid Eljaaly ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Clinical Cure ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

World Health ◽

Significant Difference ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Epidemiological Characteristics

Introduction: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease caused by Brucella spp. affecting multiple body systems and may lead to complications. Saudi Arabia is a country where brucellosis is endemic. This study aimed to describe the epidemiological characteristics of uncomplicated brucellosis and to assess outcomes of different antibiotic regimens. Methodology: A retrospective cohort study in a Saudi tertiary academic medical center. Adults with confirmed uncomplicated brucellosis between January 2008 and December 2018 who received antibiotics were included. The primary endpoint was clinical cure. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality and length of stay. Results: Fifty-four patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Twenty five patients received a combination of doxycycline, rifampin, and aminoglycoside (group 1), whereas 29 patients received doxycycline and rifampin (group 2). There was no significant difference between the two groups in clinical cure, all-cause mortality, length of stay, and end of therapy parameters, including temperature, white blood cells count, C-reactive protein levels, and erythrocyte sedimentation rates. Conclusions: Due to lack of differences in clinical outcomes, mortality, length of stay, and end of therapy parameters between the two groups, a regimen comprising two, rather than three, agents can be sufficient for uncomplicated brucellosis. This finding conforms to previous studies. Therefore, replacing rifampin with an aminoglycoside for its presumed superior efficacy as per the World Health Organization's guidelines is not substantiated by our study. Further studies with a larger sample size are required to confirm these findings.

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of A retrospective cohort study on the association between elevated preoperative red cell distribution width and all-cause mortality after noncardiac surgery.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.737641408.793575041 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yuguang Huang ◽

Xiaohan Xu

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Noncardiac Surgery ◽

Red Cell Distribution Width ◽

Red Cell ◽

Cell Distribution ◽

Distribution Width ◽

All Cause Mortality

Download Full-text

Nonunion Rates in Hind- and Midfoot Arthrodesis in Current, Ex-, and Nonsmokers

Foot & Ankle International ◽

10.1177/1071100720971269 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 107110072097126

Author(s):

Jack Allport ◽

Jayasree Ramaskandhan ◽

Malik S. Siddique

Keyword(s):

Risk Factor ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Relative Risk ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Smoking Status ◽

Time Frame ◽

Modifiable Risk Factor ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Significant Difference

Background: Nonunion rates in hind or midfoot arthrodesis have been reported as high as 41%. The most notable and readily modifiable risk factor that has been identified is smoking. In 2018, 14.4% of the UK population were active smokers. We examined the effect of smoking status on union rates for a large cohort of patients undergoing hind- or midfoot arthrodesis. Methods: In total, 381 consecutive primary joint arthrodeses were identified from a single surgeon’s logbook (analysis performed on a per joint basis, with a triple fusion reported as 3 separate joints). Patients were divided based on self-reported smoking status. Primary outcome was clinical union. Delayed union, infection, and the need for ultrasound bone stimulation were secondary outcomes. Results: Smoking prevalence was 14.0%, and 32.2% were ex-smokers. Groups were comparable for sex, diabetes, and body mass index. Smokers were younger and had fewer comorbidities. Nonunion rates were higher in smokers (relative risk, 5.81; 95% CI, 2.54-13.29; P < .001) with no statistically significant difference between ex-smokers and nonsmokers. Smokers had higher rates of infection ( P = .05) and bone stimulator use ( P < .001). Among smokers, there was a trend toward slower union with heavier smoking ( P = .004). Conclusion: This large retrospective cohort study confirmed previous evidence that smoking has a considerable negative effect on union in arthrodesis. The 5.81 relative risk in a modifiable risk factor is extremely high. Arthrodesis surgery should be undertaken with extreme caution in smokers. Our study shows that after cessation of smoking, the risk returns to normal, but we were unable to quantify the time frame. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Download Full-text

387. Markers for Mortality in COVID-19 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.582 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S262-S262

Author(s):

Kok Hoe Chan ◽

Bhavik Patel ◽

Iyad Farouji ◽

Addi Suleiman ◽

Jihad Slim

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Logistic Regression ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Prognostic Markers ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Laboratory Data ◽

Significant Difference ◽

New Onset

Abstract Background Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can lead to many different cardiovascular complications, we were interested in studying prognostic markers in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter (A. Fib/Flutter). Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients with confirmed COVID-19 and either with existing or new onset A. Fib/Flutter who were admitted to our hospital between March 15 and May 20, 2020. Demographic, outcome and laboratory data were extracted from the electronic medical record and compared between survivors and non-survivors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were employed to identify the prognostic markers associated with mortality in patients with A. Fib/Flutter Results The total number of confirmed COVID-19 patients during the study period was 350; 37 of them had existing or new onset A. Fib/Flutter. Twenty one (57%) expired, and 16 (43%) were discharged alive. The median age was 72 years old, ranged from 19 to 100 years old. Comorbidities were present in 33 (89%) patients, with hypertension (82%) being the most common, followed by diabetes (46%) and coronary artery disease (30%). New onset of atrial fibrillation was identified in 23 patients (70%), of whom 13 (57%) expired; 29 patients (78%) presented with atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, and 2 patients (5%) with atrial flutter. Mechanical ventilation was required for 8 patients, of whom 6 expired. In univariate analysis, we found a significant difference in baseline ferritin (p=0.04), LDH (p=0.02), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p=0.05), neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR) (p=0.03) and platelet (p=0.015) between survivors and non-survivors. With multivariable logistic regression analysis, the only value that had an odds of survival was a low NLR (odds ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.53–0.93). Conclusion This retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 demonstrated an association of increase NLR as risk factors for death in COVID-19 patients with A. Fib/Flutter. A high NLR has been associated with increased incidence, severity and risk for stroke in atrial fibrillation patients but to our knowledge, we are first to demonstrate the utilization in mortality predictions in COVID-19 patients with A. Fib/Flutter. Disclosures Jihad Slim, MD, Abbvie (Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead (Speaker’s Bureau)Jansen (Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV (Speaker’s Bureau)

Download Full-text

The change of coagulation profile in two-staged arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection patients: a retrospective cohort study

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-021-02477-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Hao Li ◽

Rui Li ◽

L. L. Li ◽

Wei Chai ◽

Chi Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Persistent Infection ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Joint Infection ◽

Diagnostic Study ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Coagulation Profile ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Aims Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total joint arthroplasty. We performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate (1) the change of coagulation profile in two-staged arthroplasty patients and (2) the relationship between coagulation profile and the outcomes of reimplantation. Method Between January 2011 and December 2018, a total of 202 PJI patients who were operated on with two-staged arthroplasty were included in this study initially. This study continued for 2 years and the corresponding medical records were scrutinized to establish the diagnosis of PJI based on the 2014 MSIS criteria. The coagulation profile was recorded at two designed points, (1) preresection and (2) preimplantation. The difference of coagulation profile between preresection and preimplantation was evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the coagulation profile and change of coagulation profile for predicting persistent infection before reimplantation. Results The levels of APTT, INR, platelet count, PT, TT, and plasma fibrinogen before spacer implantation were significantly higher than before reimplantation. No significant difference was detected in the levels of D-dimer, ACT, and AT3 between the two groups. The AUC of the combined coagulation profile and the change of combined coagulation profile for predicting persistent infection before reimplantation was 0.667 (95% CI 0.511, 0.823) and 0.667 (95% CI 0.526, 0.808), respectively. Conclusion The coagulation profile before preresection is different from before preimplantation in two-staged arthroplasty and the coagulation markers may play a role in predicting infection eradication before reimplantation when two-stage arthroplasty is performed. Level of evidence Level III, diagnostic study.

Download Full-text

Outcomes after Prehospital Traumatic Cardiac Arrest in the Netherlands: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Injury ◽

10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.088 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Thymen Houwen ◽

Zar Popal ◽

Marcel A.N. de Bruijn ◽

Anna-Marie R. Leemeyer ◽

Joost H. Peters ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cohort Study ◽

The Netherlands ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Traumatic Cardiac Arrest

Download Full-text

The Change of Coagulation Profile in Two-staged Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Patients：A Retrospective Cohort Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-157725/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Hao Li ◽

Rui Li ◽

Liangliang Li ◽

Chi Xu ◽

Wei Chai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Persistent Infection ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Joint Infection ◽

Diagnostic Study ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Coagulation Profile ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Aims：Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) a serious complication of total joint arthroplasty. We performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate 1) the change of coagulation profile in two-staged arthroplasty patients 2) the relationship between coagulation profile and the outcomes of reimplantation. Method: Between 2011 January and 2018 December, a total of 202 PJI patients who were performed with two-staged arthroplasty were included in this study initially. They were followed up at least 2 years and corresponding medical records were scrutinized to establish the diagnosis of PJI based on the 2014 MSIS criteria. The coagulation profile was recorded at two designed points 1) preresection and 2) preimplantation. Then, the difference of coagulation profile between preresection and preimplantation was evaluated. Besides, receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of coagulation profile and the change of coagulation profile for predicting persistent infection before reimplantation. Results: The levels of APTT, INR, platelet count, PT, TT and plasma fibrinogen before spacer implantation were significantly higher than that before reimplantation. No significant difference was detected in the levels of D-dimer, ACT, AT3 between the two groups. The AUC of the combined coagulation profile and the change of combined coagulation profile for predicting persistent infection before reimplantation was 0.667 (95%CI:(0.511,0.823) and 0.667 (95%CI: (0.526,0.808)), respectively.Conclusion: The coagulation profile before preresection is different from that before preimplantation in two-staged arthroplasty and the coagulation markers may play a role in predicting infection eradication before reimplantation when two-stage arthroplasty is performed. Level of Evidence: level III, diagnostic study

Download Full-text

Abstract P609: Restarting Anticoagulant Therapy After Intracranial Hemorrhage With Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p609 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Dong Hoon Shin ◽

Jaehun Jung ◽

Gi Hwan Bae

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Antiplatelet Agents ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Hemorrhagic Events ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Severe Hemorrhage

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) should be treated with anticoagulants to prevent stroke and systemic embolism. Resuming anticoagulation after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) poses a clinical conundrum. The absence of evidence-based guidelines to address this issue has led to wide variations in restarting anticoagulation after ICH. This study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits of anticoagulation therapy on all-cause mortality, severe thromboembolism, and severe hemorrhage and compare the effect of novel direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin on post-ICH mortality in patients with AF. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed using health insurance claim data obtained between 2002 and 2017 from individuals with newly developed ICH with comorbid AF. We excluded participants aged < 40 years and those with traumatic ICH, subdural hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were severe thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and non-users were analyzed for survival with propensity score matching. Results: Among 6735 participants, 1743 (25.9%) and 1690 (25.1%) used anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, respectively. Anticoagulant (HR, 0.321; 95% CI, 0.264-0.390; P < 0.0001) or antiplatelet users (HR, 0.393; 95% CI, 0.330-0.468; P < 0.0001) had a lower risk of all-cause mortality than non-users. However, there was no difference between the two drug users (HR, 1.183; 95% CI, 0.94-1.487; P = 0.152; reference: anticoagulant). The risk of acute thrombotic events, although not hemorrhagic events, was significantly lower in anticoagulant users than in antiplatelet users. In addition, anticoagulation between 6 to 8 weeks post-ICH showed a tendency of the lowest risk of death. Further, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality than warfarin. Conclusions: Our results showed that in patients with AF, resuming anticoagulants between 6 and 8 weeks after ICH improved all-cause mortality, severe thromboembolism, and severe hemorrhage. Further, compared with warfarin, NOAC had additional benefits.

Download Full-text