scholarly journals Evolution and prediction of mismatch between observed and perceived upper limb function after stroke: a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bea Essers ◽  
Annick Van Gils ◽  
Christophe Lafosse ◽  
Marc Michielsen ◽  
Hilde Beyens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Good Match ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Upper Limb Function ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

Abstract Background A previously shown ‘mismatch’ group of patients with good observed upper limb (UL) motor function but low perceived UL activity at six months post stroke tends to use the affected UL less in daily life than would be expected based on clinical tests, and this mismatch may also be present at 12 months. We aimed to confirm this group in another cohort, to investigate the evolution of this group from six to 12 months, and to determine factors on admission to inpatient rehabilitation and at 6 months that can discriminate between mismatch and good match groups at 12 months. Methods Persons after stroke were recruited on rehabilitation admission and re-assessed at six and 12 months. Observed UL function was measured with the upper extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) and perceived UL activity by the hand subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS-Hand). We defined mismatch as good observed UL function (FMA-UE > 50/66) but low perceived activity (SIS-Hand≤75/100). Potential discriminators at admission and 6 months (demographic characteristics, stroke characteristics, UL somatosensory function, cognitive deficits, mental function and activity) were statistically compared for match and mismatch groups at 12 months. Results We included 60 participants (female: 42%) with mean (SD) age of 65 (12) years. We confirmed a mismatch group of 11 (18%) patients at 6 months, which increased to 14 (23%) patients at 12 months. In the mismatch group compared to the good match group at 12 months, patients had a higher stroke severity and more somatosensory impairments on admission and at 6 months. Conclusions We confirmed a group of patients with good observed UL function but low perceived activity both at six and at 12 months post stroke. Assessment of stroke severity and somatosensory impairments on admission into rehabilitation could determine mismatch at 12 months and might warrant intervention. However, large differences in clinical outcomes between patients in the mismatch group indicate the importance of tailoring training to the individual needs.

scholarly journals Daily Life Upper Limb Activity for Patients with Match and Mismatch between Observed Function and Perceived Activity in the Chronic Phase Post Stroke

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 5917
Author(s):  
Bea Essers ◽  
Marjan Coremans ◽  
Janne Veerbeek ◽  
Andreas Luft ◽  
Geert Verheyden
Keyword(s):  
Motor Function ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Chronic Stroke ◽  
Good Match ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale

We investigated actual daily life upper limb (UL) activity in relation to observed UL motor function and perceived UL activity in chronic stroke in order to better understand and improve UL activity in daily life. In 60 patients, we collected (1) observed UL motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE)), (2) perceived UL activity (hand subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-Hand)), and (3) daily life UL activity (bilateral wrist-worn accelerometers for 72 h) data. Data were compared between two groups of interest, namely (1) good observed (FMA-UE >50) function and good perceived (SIS-Hand >75) activity (good match, n = 16) and (2) good observed function but low perceived (SIS-Hand ≤75) activity (mismatch, n = 15) with Mann–Whitney U analysis. The mismatch group only differed from the good match group in perceived UL activity (median (Q1–Q3) = 50 (30–70) versus 93 (85–100); p < 0.001). Despite similar observed UL motor function and other clinical characteristics, the affected UL in the mismatch group was less active in daily life compared to the good match group (p = 0.013), and the contribution of the affected UL compared to the unaffected UL for each second of activity (magnitude ratio) was lower (p = 0.022). We conclude that people with chronic stroke with low perceived UL activity indeed tend to use their affected UL less in daily life despite good observed UL motor function.

The impact of a patient-directed activity program on functional outcomes and activity participation after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation—a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-514
Author(s):  
Chad Swank ◽  
Molly Trammell ◽  
Librada Callender ◽  
Monica Bennett ◽  
Kara Patterson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Activity Program ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale

Objective: Individuals post stroke are inactive, even during rehabilitation, contributing to ongoing disability and risk of secondary health conditions. Our aims were to (1) conduct a randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of a “Patient-Directed Activity Program” on functional outcomes in people post stroke during inpatient rehabilitation and (2) examine differences three months post inpatient rehabilitation discharge. Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation facility. Subjects: Patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation post stroke. Interventions: Patient-Directed Activity Program (PDAP) or control (usual care only). Both groups underwent control (three hours of therapy/day), while PDAP participants were prescribed two additional 30-minute activity sessions/day. Main measures: Outcomes (Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement Measure, Functional Independence Measure, balance, physical activity, Stroke Impact Scale) were collected at admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and three-month follow-up. Results: Seventy-three patients (PDAP ( n = 37); control ( n = 36)) were included in the primary analysis. Patients in PDAP completed a total of 23.1 ± 16.5 sessions (10.7 ± 8.5 upper extremity; 12.4 ± 8.6 lower extremity) during inpatient rehabilitation. No differences were observed between groups at discharge in functional measures. PDAP completed significantly more steps/day (PDAP = 657.70 ± 655.82, control = 396.17 ± 419.65; P = 0.022). The Stroke Impact Scale showed significantly better memory and thinking (PDAP = 86.2 ± 11.4, control = 80.8 ± 16.7; P = 0.049), communication (PDAP = 93.6 ± 8.3, control = 89.6 ± 12.4; P = 0.042), mobility (PDAP = 62.2 ± 22.5, control = 53.8 ± 21.8; P = 0.038), and overall recovery from stroke (PDAP = 62.1 ± 19.1, control = 52.2 ± 18.7; P = 0.038) for PDAP compared to control. At three months post discharge, PDAP ( n = 11) completed significantly greater physical activity ( P = 0.014; 3586.5 ± 3468.5 steps/day) compared to control ( n = 10; 1760.9 ± 2346.3 steps/day). Conclusion: Functional outcome improvement was comparable between groups; however, PDAP participants completed more steps and perceived greater recovery.

scholarly journals Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect Subtypes and Relationship to Functional Outcome Six Months After Stroke

2021 ◽  
pp. 154596832110329
Author(s):  
Margaret J. Moore ◽  
Kathleen Vancleef ◽  
M. Jane Riddoch ◽  
Celine R. Gillebert ◽  
Nele Demeyere
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Visuospatial Neglect ◽  
Recovery Pattern ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Initial Severity

Background/Objective. This study aims to investigate how complex visuospatial neglect behavioural phenotypes predict long-term outcomes, both in terms of neglect recovery and broader functional outcomes after 6 months post-stroke. Methods. This study presents a secondary cohort study of acute and 6-month follow-up data from 400 stroke survivors who completed the Oxford Cognitive Screen’s Cancellation Task. At follow-up, patients also completed the Stroke Impact Scale questionnaire. These data were analysed to identify whether any specific combination of neglect symptoms is more likely to result in long-lasting neglect or higher levels of functional impairment, therefore warranting more targeted rehabilitation. Results. Overall, 98/142 (69%) neglect cases recovered by follow-up, and there was no significant difference in the persistence of egocentric/allocentric (X2 [1] = .66 and P = .418) or left/right neglect (X2 [2] = .781 and P = .677). Egocentric neglect was found to follow a proportional recovery pattern with all patients demonstrating a similar level of improvement over time. Conversely, allocentric neglect followed a non-proportional recovery pattern with chronic neglect patients exhibiting a slower rate of improvement than those who recovered. A multiple regression analysis revealed that the initial severity of acute allocentric, but not egocentric, neglect impairment acted as a significant predictor of poor long-term functional outcomes (F [9,300] = 4.742, P < .001 and adjusted R2 = .098). Conclusions. Our findings call for systematic neuropsychological assessment of both egocentric and allocentric neglect following stroke, as the occurrence and severity of these conditions may help predict recovery outcomes over and above stroke severity alone.

scholarly journals Outcome after Stroke upon Awakening

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janel O. Nadeau ◽  
Jiming Fang ◽  
Moira K. Kapral ◽  
Frank L. Silver ◽  
Michael D. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Linear Modeling ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Level Of Consciousness ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Ischemic Attack

ABSTRACT:Background:An estimated 20-25% of all strokes occur during sleep and these patients wake up with their deficits. This study evaluated outcomes among patients who woke up with stroke compared to those who were awake at stroke onset.Methods:Using data from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network Phases 1 and 2, we compared demographics, clinical data and six-month outcomes between patients with stroke-on-awakening versus stroke-while-awake. Strokes of all types (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage) were included. Standard descriptive statistics, multivariable logistic regression and general linear modeling were applied to the data to compare variables.Results:Among 2,585 stroke patients, 349 (13.5%) woke up with stroke and 2,236 (86.5%) did not. Patients with stroke-on-awakening were more likely to have higher blood pressure and to suffer ischemic stroke, but stroke severity, measured by level of consciousness, did not differ. Mortality both at discharge and at six-month follow-up did not differ between the two cohorts. However, patients with stroke-on-awakening were less likely to return home, and their median Stroke Impact Scale-16 scores were 7.0 points lower compared to those with stroke-while-awake.Conclusions:There are minor demographic and clinical differences between patients with stroke-on-awakening and stroke-while-awake. Functional outcomes are slightly worse among patients with stroke-on-awakening, an effect which was driven by poor outcomes among patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

EFFECT OF LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY ON HEMIPLEGIC SHOULDER PAIN IN POST STROKE SUBJECTS

2021 ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Pappala kiran Prakash ◽  
Dommeti Sai Sushmitha ◽  
P.R.S Thulasi ◽  
Ganapathi Swamy
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Rehabilitation Programme ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Upper Limb Function ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Shoulder pain is a common complication of a stroke which can impede participation in rehabilitation and has been associated with poor outcomes. Low Level LASER Therapy (LLLT) is one of the adjunct treatments of choice with exercise therapy for shoulder rehabilitation in Physiotherapy. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of LLLT on Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain (HSP) in reducing shoulder pain and improving upper limb function in post Stroke subjects. Prospective study design. 68 subjects with mean age of 53 years having a clinical diagnosis of Stroke with HSP were randomly allocated into two groups. In Group-A (n=34) subjects were treated with LLLT and standardized Rehabilitation Programme, where as in Group-B (n=34) subjects were treated with standardized Rehabilitation Programme. Participants were given interventions twice a week for 8 weeks. The outcomes of this intervention were measured by SPADI for pain, disability and FMA-UE for function. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that within group comparison both groups showed signicant improvement in all parameters, where as in between groups comparison Group-A showed better improvement compared to the Group-B. After 8 weeks of interventions both Group-A and Group-B showed signicant improvement in reducing pain and improving upper limb function. However LLLT along with Standardized Rehabilitation Programme showed more improvement when compared to the Standardised Rehabilitation Programme alone. Thus this study concludes that LLLT is a useful adjunct in HSPalong with rehabilitation

Pre-existing Comorbidity Burden and Patient Perceived Stroke Impact

2020 ◽  
pp. 174749302092083
Author(s):  
Katherine Sewell ◽  
Tamara Tse ◽  
Elizabeth Harris ◽  
Thomas Matyas ◽  
Leonid Churilov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Charlson Comorbidity Index ◽  
First Year ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Point Increase ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Comorbidity Burden ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Perceived Impact

Background Pre-existing comorbidities can compromise recovery post-stroke. However, the association between comorbidity burden and patient-rated perceived impact has not been systematically investigated. To date, only observer-rated outcome measures of function, disability, and dependence have been used, despite the complexity of the impact of stroke on an individual. Aim Our aim was to explore the association between comorbidity burden and patient-rated perceived impact and overall recovery, within the first-year post-stroke, after adjusting for stroke severity, age, and sex. Methods The sample comprised 177 stroke survivors from 18 hospitals throughout Australia and New Zealand. Comorbidity burden was calculated using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Perceived impact and recovery were measured by the Stroke Impact Scale index and Stroke Impact Scale overall recovery scale. Quantile regression models were applied to investigate the association between comorbidity burden and perceived impact and recovery. Results Significant negative associations between the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Stroke Impact Scale index were found at three months. At the .25 quantile, a one-point increase on the Charlson Comorbidity Index was associated with 6.80-points decrease on the Stroke Impact Scale index (95%CI: −11.26, −2.34; p = .003). At the median and .75 quantile, a one-point increase on the Charlson Comorbidity Index was associated, respectively, with 3.58-points decrease (95%CI: −5.62, −1.54; p = .001) and 1.76-points decrease (95%CI: −2.80, −0.73; p = .001) on the Stroke Impact Scale index. At 12 months, at the .25 and .75 quantiles, a one-point increase on the Charlson Comorbidity Index was associated, respectively, with 6.47-points decrease (95%CI: −11.05, −1.89; p = .006) and 1.26-points decrease (95%CI: −2.11, −0.42; p = .004) on the Stroke Impact Scale index. For the Stroke Impact Scale overall recovery measure, significant negative associations were found only at the median at three months and at the .75 quantile at 12 months. Conclusion Comorbidity burden is independently associated with patient-rated perceived impact within the first-year post-stroke. The addition of patient-rated impact measures in personalized rehabilitation may enhance the use of conventional observer-rated outcome measures.

Abstract P52: Absence of Dysphagia is a Stronger Predictor of Favorable Discharge Disposition than Stroke Severity: Insights from the UTHSC Houston Stroke Registry

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nneka I Jones ◽  
Nusrat Harun ◽  
Elizabeth Noser ◽  
James Grotta
Keyword(s):  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Level Of Care ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Nursing Facility ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Discharge Disposition

Introduction: Dysphagia is one of the most common post-stroke complications. The use of feeding tubes to provide nutrition requires increased acuity of care for management, which affects costs. This care is provided at all levels, including Inpatient Rehabilitation (IR), Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) or Sub-acute (Sub). There are limited studies of the role of dysphagia as a predictor of post-stroke disposition. Hypothesis: Low NIHSS is a predictor of higher function. We assessed the hypothesis that the absence of tube feeds as an indicator of dysphagia is a predictor of post-stroke disposition to a similar functional level. Methods: All patients admitted to the UT Stroke Service between January 2004 and October 2009 were included. Stratification occurred for age >65, NIHSS and stroke risk factors. Using multivariate logistic regression, the data was analyzed to determine if differences in post-stroke disposition were present among patients not receiving tube feeds as an indicator of dysphagia. Results: Home vs. Other Level of Care Of 3389 patients, 1668 were discharged home, 1721 to another level of care. Patients without tube feeds are 14.6 times more likely to be discharged home (P = <.0001, OR 14.66, 95% CI 8.05 to 26.69) Patients with NIHSS < 8 are 10.9 times more likely to be discharged home. IR vs. SNF Of 1546 patients, 983 were discharged to acute IR, 563 to SNF. Patients without tube feeds are 6.1 times more likely to be discharged to IR (P = <.0001, OR 6.118, 95% CI 4.34 to 8.63). Patients with NIHSS < 8 are 2.5 times more likely to be discharged to IR. SNF vs. Sub Of 738 patients, 563 were discharged to SNF, 175 to Sub. Patients without tube feeds are 3 times more likely to be discharged to SNF (P = <.0001, OR 2.999, 95% CI 2.048 to 4.390). Patients with NIHSS < 8 are 2 times more likely to be discharged to SNF. Conclusions: The absence of tube feeds as an indicator of dysphagia is a predictor of improved post-stroke disposition, with a correlation stronger than NIHSS. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and unmeasured psychosocial factors related to discharge. Prospective studies should focus on early diagnosis, therapeutic intervention and caregiver involvement in dysphagia education to improve outcomes and decrease the cost of post-stroke care.

scholarly journals Arm-hand boost therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Meyer ◽  
Geert Verheyden ◽  
Kristof Kempeneers ◽  
Marc Michielsen
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Core Stability ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Upper Limb Function ◽  
Pilot Rct

AbstractObjectiveIt was the aim to assess feasibility, safety and potential efficacy of a new intensive, focused arm-hand BOOST program and to investigate whether there is a difference between early versus late delivery of the program in the sub-acute phase post stroke.MethodsIn this pilot RCT, patients with stroke were randomized to the immediate group (IG): 4 weeks (4w) BOOST +4w CONTROL or the delayed group (DG): 4w CONTROL +4w BOOST, on top of their usual inpatient care program. The focused arm-hand BOOST program (1 hour/day, 5x/week, 4 weeks) consisted of group exercises with focus on scapula-setting, core-stability, manipulation and complex ADL tasks. Additionally, one hour per week the Armeo®Power (Hocoma AG, Switzerland) was used. The CONTROL intervention comprised a dose-matched program (24 one-hour sessions in 4w) of lower limb strengthening exercises and general reconditioning. At baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of training, the Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity (FMA-UE), action research arm test (ARAT) and stroke upper limb capacity scale (SULCS) were administered.ResultsEighteen participants (IG: n=10, DG: n=8) were included, with a median (IQR) time post stroke of 8.6 weeks (5-12). No adverse events were experienced. After 4 weeks of training, significant between-group differences were found for FMA-UE (p=0.003) and SULCS (p=0.033) and a trend for ARAT (p=0.075) with median (IQR) change scores for the IG of 9 (7-16), 2 (1-3) and 12.5 (1-18) respectively, and for the DG of 0.5 (−3-3), 1 (0-1) and 1.5 (−1-9), respectively. In the IG, 80% of patients improved beyond the minimal clinical important difference of FMA-UE after 4 weeks, compared to none of the DG patients. Between 4 and 8 weeks of training, patients in the DG tend to show larger improvements when compared to the IG, however, between-group comparisons did not reach significance.ConclusionsResults of this pilot RCT showed that an intensive, specific arm-hand BOOST program, on top of usual care, is feasible and safe in the sub-acute phase post stroke and suggests positive, clinical meaningful effects on upper limb function, especially when delivered in the early sub-acute phase post stroke.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04584177

scholarly journals Discriminant Validity of the Stroke Impact Scale

Stroke ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 361-361
Author(s):  
Sue-Min Lai Dr ◽  
Stephanie Studenski Dr ◽  
Pamela W Duncan Dr ◽  
Subashan Perera Dr
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
P Values ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale

P123 Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the discriminant validity of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) by comparing function and quality of life in stroke patients to assessments from stroke-free community dwelling elderly. Methods: The SIS was administered at 90 to 120 days post-stroke to subjects who participated in the Kansas City Stroke Registry (KCSR). The same impact scale was also administered cross-sectionally to community dwelling elderly who were recruited from primary care clinics for participation in an ongoing prospective study of health and function (Merck). All subjects were queried for responses to 64 items of the SIS including eight domains: strength, memory and thinking, emotion, communication, ADL/IADL, mobility, upper extremity, and social participation. Regression analyses were used to examine differences between stroke patients and stroke-free elderly in each of the eight SIS domains while controlling for demographics and comorbidities. Results: One hundred and sixty KCSR subjects and two hundred and forty-three subjects from the Merck study were included in the present analysis. The mean ages were 73±10.1 and 74±5.1, respectively. Gender and race were similar in both groups. The 90-days post-stroke mean Barthel ADL was 80±23 in the stroke patients. Mean scores of all 8 SIS domains were significantly lower in stroke patients than those in the stroke-free community dwelling elderly even after controlling for differences in age and comorbidities (all p values < 0.0001). Mean scores of the 7 SIS domains (except strength), even in stroke patients who had Barthel ADL > 90 at 90-days post-stroke, remained lower than those in the stroke-free community dwelling elderly (p values < 0.01). Conclusion: The SIS was able to discriminate well between stroke patients with disability and stroke-free elderly subjects. Patients who had recovered basic ADLs continued to have residual disability and impaired quality of life when compared to non-stroke patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document