scholarly journals Influence of surgical evacuation on pregnancy outcomes of subsequent embryo transfer cycle following miscarriage in an initial IVF cycle: a retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junan Meng ◽  
Mengchen Zhu ◽  
Wenjuan Shen ◽  
Xiaomin Huang ◽  
Haixiang Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Miscarriage Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgical Evacuation

Abstract Background It is still uncertain whether surgical evacuation adversely affects subsequent embryo transfer. The present study aims to assess the influence of surgical evacuation on the pregnancy outcomes of subsequent embryo transfer cycle following first trimester miscarriage in an initial in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycle. Methods A total of 645 patients who underwent their first trimester miscarriage in an initial IVF cycle between January 2013 and May 2016 in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were enrolled. Surgical evacuation was performed when the products of conception were retained more than 8 h after medical evacuation. Characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were compared between surgical evacuation patients and no surgical evacuation patients. The pregnancy outcomes following surgical evacuation were further compared between patients with ≥ 8 mm or < 8 mm endometrial thickness (EMT), and with the different EMT changes. Results The EMT in the subsequent embryo transfer cycle of surgical evacuation group was much thinner when compared with that in the no surgical evacuation group (9.0 ± 1.6 mm vs. 9.4 ± 1.9 mm, P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate or miscarriage rate between surgical evacuation group and no surgical evacuation group (P > 0.05). The live birth rate was higher in EMT ≥ 8 mm group when compared to < 8 mm group in surgical evacuation patients (43.0% vs. 17.4%, P < 0.05). Conclusions There was no significant difference in the pregnancy outcomes of subsequent embryo transfer cycle between surgical evacuation patients and no surgical evacuation patients. Surgical evacuation led to the decrease of EMT, especially when the EMT < 8 mm was association with a lower live birth rate.

The Deferred Embryo Transfer Strategy Seems Not to be a Good Option After Repeated IVF/ICSI Cycle Failures

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1210-1217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Bourdon ◽  
Pietro Santulli ◽  
Yulian Chen ◽  
Catherine Patrat ◽  
Khaled Pocate-Cheriet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
Icsi Cycle ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess whether a deferred frozen–thawed embryo transfer (Def-ET) offers any benefits compared to a fresh ET strategy in women who have had 2 or more consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic injection (ICSI) cycle failures. Design: An observational cohort study in a tertiary referral care center including 416 cycles from women with a previous history of 2 or more consecutive IVF/ICSI failures cycles. Both Def-ET and fresh ET strategies were compared using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. The main outcome measured was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Results: A total of 416 cycles were included in the analysis: 197 in the fresh ET group and 219 in the Def-ET group. The CLBR was not significantly different between the fresh and Def-ET groups (58/197 [29.4%] and 57/219 [26.0%], respectively, P = .437). In addition, after the first ET, there was no significant difference in the live birth rate between the fresh ET and Def-ET groups (50/197 [25.4%] vs 44/219 [20.1%], respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that compared to the fresh strategy, the Def-ET strategy was not associated with a higher probability of live birth. Conclusions: In cases with 2 or more consecutive prior IVF/ICSI cycle failures, a Def-ET strategy did not result in better ART outcomes than a fresh ET strategy.

Thromboprophylaxis for recurrent miscarriage in women with or without thrombophilia

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (02) ◽  
pp. 295-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jantien Visser ◽  
Veli-Matti Ulander ◽  
Frans Helmerhorst ◽  
Katja Lampinen ◽  
Laure Morin-Papunen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Complications ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Recurrent Miscarriage ◽  
Fetal Loss ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Significant Difference

SummaryRecurrent miscarriage affects 1–2% of women. In more than half of all recurrent miscarriage the cause still remains uncertain. Thrombophilia has been identified in about 50% of women with recurrent miscarriage and thromboprophylaxis has been suggested as an option of treatment. A randomised double-blind (for aspirin) multicentre trial was performed among 207 women with three or more consecutive first trimester (<13 weeks) miscarriages, two or more second trimester (13–24 weeks) miscarriages or one third trimester fetal loss combined with one first trimester miscarriage. Women were analysed for thrombophilia. After complete work-up, women were randomly allocated before seven weeks’ gestation to either enoxaparin 40 mg and placebo (n=68), enoxaparin 40 mg and aspirin 100 mg (n=63) or aspirin 100 mg (n=76). The primary outcome was live-birth rate. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy complications, neonatal outcome and adverse effects. The 0.92–1.48] was found for enoxaparin and placebo and 65% [RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.83–1.39] for enoxaparin and aspirin when compared to aspirin alone (61%, reference group). In the whole study group the live birth rate was 65% (95% CI 58.66–71.74) for women with three or more miscarriages (n=204). No difference in pregnancy complications, neonatal outcome or adverse effects was observed. No significant difference in live birth rate was found with enoxaparin treatment versus aspirin or a combination of both versus aspirin in women with recurrent miscarriage.

scholarly journals Oocytes With Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum Aggregates Are Not Associated With Impaired Reproductive Outcomes: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Xu ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Zhi-Heng Chen ◽  
Min-Na Yin ◽  
Juan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Defects ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Reproductive Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference

ObjectiveTo investigate whether the reproductive outcomes of oocytes with smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) are impaired.MethodsA total of 2893 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were performed between January 2010 and December 2019 in our center. In 43 transfer cycles, transferred embryos were totally derived from SERa+ oocytes. Each of the 43 cycles was matched with a separate control subject from SERa- patient of the same age ( ± 1 year), embryo condition, main causes of infertility, type of protocols used for fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles. The clinical pregnancy, implantation, ectopic pregnancy and live birth rate were compared between the two groups.Results43 embryo transfer cycles from SERa- patient were matched to the 43 transferred cycles with pure SERa+ oocytes derived embryos. No significant difference was observed in clinical pregnancy rate (55.81% vs. 65.11%, p=0.5081), implantation rate (47.89% vs. 50.70%, p=0.8667) and live birth rate (48.84% vs. 55.81%, p=0.6659) between the SERa+ oocyte group and the matched group. No congenital birth defects were found in the two groups.ConclusionOur results suggest that the implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth and birth defects rate of embryos derived from oocytes with SERa are not impaired.

scholarly journals Delay in IVF treatment up to 180 days does not affect pregnancy outcomes in women with diminished ovarian reserve

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1630-1636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip A Romanski ◽  
Pietro Bortoletto ◽  
Zev Rosenwaks ◽  
Glenn L Schattman
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Reserve ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Diminished Ovarian Reserve ◽  
Short Term Treatment

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Will a delay in initiating IVF treatment affect pregnancy outcomes in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve? SUMMARY ANSWER A delay in IVF treatment up to 180 days does not affect the live birth rate for women with diminished ovarian reserve when compared to women who initiate IVF treatment within 90 days of presentation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In clinical practice, treatment delays can occur due to medical, logistical or financial reasons. Over a period of years, a gradual decline in ovarian reserve occurs which can result in declining outcomes in response to IVF treatment over time. There is disagreement among reproductive endocrinologists about whether delaying IVF treatment for a few months can negatively affect patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A retrospective cohort study of infertile patients in an academic hospital setting with diminished ovarian reserve who started an IVF cycle within 180 days of their initial consultation and underwent an oocyte retrieval with planned fresh embryo transfer between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Diminished ovarian reserve was defined as an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) &lt;1.1 ng/ml. In total, 1790 patients met inclusion criteria (1115 immediate and 675 delayed treatment). Each patient had one included cycle and no subsequent data from additional frozen embryo transfer cycles were included. Since all cycle outcomes evaluated were from fresh embryo transfers, no genetically tested embryos were included. Patients were grouped by whether their cycle started 1–90 days after presentation (immediate) or 91–180 days (delayed). The primary outcome was live birth (≥24 weeks of gestation). A subgroup analysis of more severe forms of diminished ovarian reserve was performed to evaluate outcomes for patients with an AMH &lt;0.5 and for patients &gt;40 years old with an AMH &lt;1.1 ng/ml (Bologna criteria for diminished ovarian reserve). Logistic regression analysis, adjusted a priori for patient age, was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI. All pregnancy outcomes were additionally adjusted for the number of embryos transferred. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The mean ± SD number of days from presentation to IVF start was 50.5 ± 21.9 (immediate) and 128.8 ± 25.9 (delayed). After embryo transfer, the live birth rate was similar between groups (immediate: 23.9%; delayed: 25.6%; OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85–1.38). Additionally, a similar live birth rate was observed in a subgroup analysis of patients with an AMH &lt;0.5 ng/ml (immediate: 18.8%; delayed: 19.1%; OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.65–1.51) and in patients &gt;40 years old with an AMH &lt;1.1 ng/ml (immediate: 12.3%; delayed: 14.7%; OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.77–1.91). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION There is the potential for selection bias with regard to the patients who started their IVF cycle within 90 days compared to 91–180 days after initial consultation. In addition, we did not include patients who were seen for initial evaluation but did not progress to IVF treatment with oocyte retrieval; therefore, our results should only be applied to patients with diminished ovarian reserve who complete an IVF cycle. Finally, since we excluded patients who started their IVF cycle greater than 180 days from their first visit, it is not known how such a delay in treatment affects pregnancy outcomes in IVF cycles. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS A delay in initiating IVF treatment in patients with diminished ovarian reserve up to 180 days from the initial visit does not affect pregnancy outcomes. This observation remains true for patients who are in the high-risk categories for poor response to ovarian stimulation. Providers and patients should be reassured that when a short-term treatment delay is deemed necessary for medical, logistic or financial reasons, treatment outcomes will not be affected. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No financial support, funding or services were obtained for this study. The authors do not report any potential conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.

P–677 Endometrial thickness, endometrial preparation protocol and number of euploid embryos transferred, significantly impact the live birth in frozen embryo transfer cycles

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Liñá. Tegedor ◽  
I Elkhatib ◽  
A Abdala ◽  
A Bayram ◽  
K Ab. Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Endometrial Preparation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Ploidy Status

Abstract Study question Is the live birth rate (LBR) in euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles affected by the endometrial thickness (EMT)? Summary answer A significantly higher LBR was observed in patients with an endometrial thickness of at least 7.5mm (46.24% vs. 54.63%) What is known already Parameters assessing the endometrium prior planning a FET include endometrial thickness, pattern and blood flow. The impact of the endometrial thickness on ART outcomes is controversial, with conflicting results published. A recent meta-analysis evaluated whether EMT could predict pregnancy outcomes and suggested that lower EMT was associated with lower incidence of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR) and LBR. Due to heterogeneity of parameters evaluated between different publications, where embryos with unknown ploidy status were transferred, in conjunction with variability of stimulation protocols and the number of embryos transferred, the real effect of the EMT was difficult to infer. Study design, size, duration This was a two-center retrospective observational study including a total of 1522 euploid FET cycles between March 2017 and March 2020 at ART Fertility Clinics Muscat, Oman and Abu Dhabi, UAE. Participants/materials, setting, methods Trophectoderm biopsies were analyzed with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Vitrification/warming of blastocysts was performed using Cryotop method (Kitazato). EMT was measured by vaginal ultrasound prior initiating the progesterone administration (± 1 day) and LBR was recorded. Multivariate analysis was performed between LB outcomes and median EMT while controlling for confounding factors. Main results and the role of chance A total of 1522 FET cycles were analyzed: 975 single embryo transfer (SET) and 547 double embryo transfer (DET). The mean age of the patients was 33.38 years with a mean BMI of 27.1 kg/m2. FET were performed in EMT ranging from 3 to 15 mm and 50.52% resulted in a live birth. Though potentially all ranges of EMT were associated with LB, the median EMT in patients with LB was significantly higher than the median EMT of patients without LB (7.6mm vs. 7.4mm; p &lt; 0.001). The dataset was stratified into two groups based on the median EMT (7.5mm): &lt; 7.5mm (n = 744 cycles) and ≥ 7.5mm (n = 778 cycles). A significantly higher live birth rate was observed in ≥ 7.5mm group (46.24% vs. 54.63%. p = 0.0012). In multivariate analysis, EMT, FET endometrial preparation protocol, and number of embryos transferred were the main parameters influencing the chance to achieve LB: OR 1.10 [1.01–1.19], p &lt; 0.015 for the EMT; OR 1.84 [1.47–2.30], p &lt; 0.0001 for Natural Cycle protocol and OR 1.55 [1.25–1.93], p &lt; 0.0001 for DET. Intercept 0.18 [0.07–0.44] p &lt; 0.0002. Female age did not reach significance: OR 1.02 [1.00–1.04], p = 0.056. Limitations, reasons for caution Besides the retrospective nature of the study, the inter-observer variability in EMT assessment between different physicians is a limitation. The physician and embryologist performing the embryo transfer could not been standardized due to the multicenter design of the study. Wider implications of the findings: The EMT in FET may influence the LBR and should be considered as an important factor for the success of embryo transfer cycles. Whether these results can be extrapolated to fresh embryo transfer and to blastocysts with unknown ploidy status, needs further investigation. Trial registration number Not applicable

scholarly journals Twice vitrification-warming procedures has no effect on frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
xiaoyue Shen ◽  
Min Ding ◽  
Yuan Yan ◽  
Shanshan Wang ◽  
jianjun Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Miscarriage Rate ◽  
Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer ◽  
Thawed Embryo Transfer

Abstract Background To evaluate the frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) outcomes of repeated cryopreservation by vitrification of blastocysts derived from vitrified-warmed day3 embryos in patients who experienced implantation failure previously. Methods We retrospect the files of patients who underwent single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles in our reproductive medical center from January 2013 to December 2019. 127 patients transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts derived from vitrified-warmed day3 embryos were defined as twice-cryopreserved group. 1567 patients who transfer blastocysts that had experienced once vitrified-warmed were used as once-cryopreserved group. None of them was pregnant at the previous FET. The outcomes were compared between two groups after a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Results The clinical pregnancy rate was 52.76%, live birth rate was 43.31% in twice-cryopreserved group. After PSM,108 pairs of patients were generated for comparison. The clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate or miscarriage rate was not significantly different between two groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that double vitrification-warming procedures did not affect FET outcomes in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.47-1.42), live birth rate (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.54-1.59), miscarriage rate (OR 0.72 95%CI 0.28-1.85). Furthermore, the pregnancy complications rate, gestational age or neonatal abnormalities rate between two groups was also comparable, while twice vitrification-warming procedures might increase the macrosomia rate (19.6% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.05). Conclusion Transfer of double vitrified-warmed embryo at cleavage stage and subsequent blastocyst stage did not affect live birth rate and neonatal abnormalities rate, but there was a tendency to increase macrosomia rate, which needs further investigation.

scholarly journals Systematic meta-analysis of subsequent pregnancy outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss couples with parental abnormal chromosomal karyotype

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng-Sheng Zheng ◽  
Shan Li ◽  
Jing Jing He
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Recurrent Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Miscarriage Rate

Background Parental abnormal chromosomal karyotypes are considered as reasons for recurrent pregnancy loss. Objective This systematic meta-analysis evaluated the current evidence on pregnancy outcomes amongst couples with abnormal versus normal chromosomal karyotypes. Search strategy Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts identified in EMBASE and PubMed from inception to January 2021. Selection criteria Studies were included if they provided a description of pregnancy outcomes of parental chromosomal abnormality. Data collection and analysis Random effects meta-analysis was used to compare odds of pregnancy outcomes associated with noncarriers and carriers. Main results A significantly lower first pregnancy live birth rate (FPLBR) was found in carriers than in noncarriers with RPL (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.46-0.65; p<0.00001). Regarding FPLBR between translocation or inversion carriers and noncarriers, a markedly decreased FPLBR was found in translocation (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31–0.61; p<0.00001) but not inversion carriers. The accumulated live birth rate (ALBR) (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.90–1.03; p=0.26) was similar, while the miscarriage rate (MR) of accumulated pregnancies (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.69–2.89; p<0.00001) was significantly higher in the carriers than in noncarriers with RPL. The ALBR was not significant (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.38–8.71; p=0.45) but the MR (OR: 5.75; 95% CI: 2.57–12.86; p<0.0001) was markedly lower for carriers who choose PGD than natural conception. Conclusions Carriers with RPL had higher risk of miscarriage but obtained a satisfying pregnancy outcome through multiple attempts. No sufficient evidence was found PGD could enhance the ALBR but it was an alternative to decrease the MR.

P–335 Endometrial compaction 5–10% is associated with the best live birth rate in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Yaprak ◽  
Y E Sukur ◽  
B Ozmen ◽  
M Sonmezer ◽  
B Berker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Endometrial Preparation ◽  
Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer ◽  
Thawed Embryo Transfer

Abstract Study question What is the effect of endometrial compaction on live birth rate in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles? Summary answer In FET cycles with artificial endometrial preparation, the chance for live birth was significantly higher in cycles with endometrial compaction. What is known already Most studies conclude that thinner the endometrium poorer the pregnancy outcome. These studies mostly include measurements in the follicular phase. Since endometrial thickness indicates receptivity, one may expect the endometrial thickness measured on ET day to be more important to predict the outcome. However, few studies assessed endometrial thickness on ET day and unlike follicular phase studies conflicting results were obtained regarding pregnancy outcome. The change in endometrial thickness may be more valuable to predict the pregnancy outcome rather than a single measurement. Study design, size, duration Retrospective observational cohort study. 283 FET cycles in which all patients underwent artificial endometrial preparation were reviewed. Participants/materials, setting, methods: The inclusion criteria were artificial endometrial preparation, age between 20–38 years. The same protocol was applied to all patients for the endometrial preparation.The change of endometrial thickness between the end of estrogen phase and embryo transfer day was recorded. Any decrement is defined as endometrial compaction. The patients were grouped according to the changes of endometrial thicknesses as compaction and non-compaction. Main results and the role of chance Among 283 cycles, 89 had endometrial compaction and 194 did not have compaction. The clinical pregnancy, implantation and live birth rates were significantly higher in the compaction group when compared to non-compaction group (P values 0.007, 0.009, and 0.039, respectively). In order to evaluate the results according to the degree of compaction, we divided the patients into 5% compaction slices. The live birth rate was significantly higher in the 5–10% compaction group (P = 0.016). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the independent effects of different variables on live birth chance.In FET cycles with artificial endometrial preparation, the chance for live birth was significantly higher in cycles with endometrial compaction (OR: 2.352, 95% confidence interval {CI} 1.297–4.264, P = 0.005). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate whether there was a certain threshold of endometrial thickness at the end of estrogen phase for endometrial compaction to occur. The sensitivity and specificity of 9.25 mm at the end of estrogen phase calculated from the ROC curve were 76.4% and 58.8%, respectively (area under the curve: 0.701, 95% CI 0.640–0.763; P &lt; 0.001). Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitations of the study were its retrospective nature, relatively small sample size and utilization of different ultrasound techniques at different measurements (using transvaginal ultrasound at the end of the estrogen phase and transabdominal ultrasound on ET day). Wider implications of the findings: Recently a cohort study they found that endometrial compaction results in better pregnancy outcomes, similar to our findings. But, this is the first study to suggest a threshold value (9.2) for endometrial thickness before the commencement of progesterone in regards to increase the chance of compaction. Trial registration number Not applicable

Effect of orlistat on live birth rate in overweight or obese women undergoing IVF-ET: A randomized clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ze Wang ◽  
Junli Zhao ◽  
Xiang Ma ◽  
Yun Sun ◽  
Guimin Hao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ivf Et

Abstract Context Obesity management prior to infertility treatment remains a challenge. To date, results from randomized clinical trials involving weight loss by lifestyle interventions have shown no evidence of improved live birth rate. Objective To determine whether pharmacologic weight-loss intervention before in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) can improve live birth rate among overweight or obese women. Design, setting, and participants We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial across 19 reproductive medical centers in China, from July 2017 to January 2019. A total of 877 infertile women scheduled for IVF who had a body mass index of 25kg/m 2 or greater were randomly assigned. Interventions The participants were randomized to receive orlistat (n=439) or placebo (n=438) treatment for 4-12 weeks. Main outcomes and measures Live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer. Results The live birth rate was not significantly different between the two groups (112 of 439 [25.5%] with orlistat and 112 of 438 [25.6%] with placebo; P=.984). No significant differences existed between the groups as to the rates of conception, clinical pregnancy, and pregnancy loss. A statistically significant increase in singleton birthweight was observed after orlistat treatment (3487.50g versus 3285.17g in the placebo group; P=.039). The mean change in body weight during the intervention was −2.49kg in the orlistat group, as compared to −1.22kg in the placebo group, with a significant difference (P=.005). Conclusions Orlistat treatment, prior to IVF-ET, did not improve live birth rate among overweight or obese women, although it was beneficial for weight reduction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document