scholarly journals Influenza vaccination should have no border: cost-effectiveness of cross-border subsidy

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Yamin ◽  
Dor Kahana ◽  
Edan Shahmoon ◽  
Meagan C. Fitzpatrick ◽  
Alison P. Galvani
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Contact Patterns ◽  
Israeli Population ◽  
Survey Results ◽  
Palestinian Population ◽  
Palestinian Territory

Abstract Background Influenza is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality for Israel and the Palestinian territory. Given the extensive interaction between the two populations, vaccination in one population may indirectly benefit the other via reduced transmission. Due to the mobility and extensive contacts, Palestinians employed in Israel could be a prime target for vaccination. Methods To evaluate the epidemiological and the economic benefits conferred by vaccinating Palestinians employed in Israel, we developed a model of influenza transmission within and between Israel and the West Bank. We parameterized the contact patterns underlying transmission by conducting a survey among Palestinians employed in Israel, and integrating survey results with traffic patterns and socio-demographic data. Results Vaccinating 50% of Palestinian workers is predicted to reduce the annual influenza burden by 28,745 cases (95% CI: 15,031-50,717) and 37.7 deaths (95% CI: 19·9–65·5) for the Israeli population, and by 32,9900 cases (95% CI: 14,379-51,531) and 20.2 deaths (CI 95%: 9·8–31·5) for the Palestinian population. Further, we found that as the indirect protection was so substantial, funding such a vaccination campaign would be cost-saving from the Israeli Ministry of Health perspective. Conclusions Offering influenza vaccination to Palestinians employed in Israel could efficiently reduce morbidity and mortality within both Israel and the Palestinian territory.

Correlates of Improved Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Personnel: A Survey of Hospitals in Louisiana

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 723-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayla L. Fricke ◽  
Mariella M. Gastañaduy ◽  
Renee Klos ◽  
Rodolfo E. Bégué
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Vaccination Rate ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Patient Contact ◽  
Hospital Type ◽  
Vaccination Rates ◽  
Item Questionnaire

Objective.To describe practices for influenza vaccination of healthcare personnel (HCP) with emphasis on correlates of increased vaccination rates.Design.Survey.Participants.Volunteer sample of hospitals in Louisiana.Methods.All hospitals in Louisiana were invited to participate. A 17-item questionnaire inquired about the hospital type, patients served, characteristics of the vaccination campaign, and the resulting vaccination rate.Results.Of 254 hospitals, 153 (60%) participated and were included in the 124 responses that were received. Most programs (64%) required that HCP either receive the vaccine or sign a declination form, and the rest were exclusively voluntary (36%); no program made vaccination a condition of employment. The median vaccination rate was 67%, and the vaccination rate was higher among hospitals that were accredited by the Joint Commission; provided acute care; served children, pregnant women, oncology patients, or intensive care unit patients; required a signed declination form; or imposed consequences for unvaccinated HCP (the most common of which was to require that a mask be worn on patient contact). Hospitals that provided free vaccine, made vaccine widely available, advertised the program extensively, required a declination form, and imposed consequences had the highest vaccination rates (median, 86%; range, 81%–91%).Conclusions.The rate of influenza vaccination of HCP remains low among the hospitals surveyed. Recommended practices may not be enough to reach 90% vaccination rates unless a signed declination requirement and consequences are implemented. Wearing a mask is a strong consequence. Demanding influenza vaccination as a condition of employment was not reported as a practice by the participating hospitals.

scholarly journals Influenza Vaccination Campaign during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experience of a Research and Teaching Hospital in Milan

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 5874
Author(s):  
Pier Mario Perrone ◽  
Giacomo Biganzoli ◽  
Maurizio Lecce ◽  
Emanuela Maria Campagnoli ◽  
Ambra Castrofino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Vaccination Coverage ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Prevalence Ratio ◽  
Coverage Rate ◽  
Vaccination Coverage Rate ◽  
Research And Teaching

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, more than ever, optimal influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare workers (HCWs) is crucial to avoid absenteeism and disruption of health services, as well as in-hospital influenza outbreaks. The aim of this study is to analyze the 2020 influenza vaccination campaign, comparing it with the previous year’s in a research and teaching hospital in Northern Italy. Methods: adopting an approach based on combined strategies, three interventions were deployed: a promotional and educational campaign, vaccination delivery through both ad hoc and on-site ambulatories, and a gaming strategy. Personal data and professional categories were collected and analyzed using univariate logistic regression. Vaccinated HCWs were asked to fill in a questionnaire to describe their reasons for vaccination adherence. Results: the vaccination coverage rate (VCR) was 43.1%, compared to 21.5% in 2019. The highest increase was registered among administrative staff (308.3%), while physicians represent the most vaccinated category (n = 600). Moreover, residents (prevalence ratio (PR): 1.12; 95% CI 1.04–1.20), as well as intensive care (PR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.24–1.69) and newborn workers (PR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.20–1.65) were, respectively, the categories most frequently vaccinated for the first time. Conclusion: the significant increase in vaccination coverage rate confirms the suitability of the combined strategy of delivering the flu vaccination campaign and represents a first step towards reaching WHO recommended vaccination rates.

scholarly journals From Isolation to Containment: Perceived Fear of Infectivity and Protective Behavioral Changes during the COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 6503
Author(s):  
Arielle Kaim ◽  
Maya Siman-Tov ◽  
Eli Jaffe ◽  
Bruria Adini
Keyword(s):  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Protective Behavior ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Road ◽  
Israeli Population ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Public Health Officials

In the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, maintenance of protective behavior is a continued challenge in the effort to contain the spread of the virus. A cross-sectional study via an internet questionnaire was utilized to elucidate changes in compliance to protective behavior among the Israeli population (n = 1120), after the beginning of the vaccination campaign. Comparison was made between individuals who were previously infected with the virus, those who received one dose of inoculation with the vaccine, and individuals that were neither infected or vaccinated. The study results indicate that those who were previously infected with the COVID-19 virus were less careful about mask wearing (18.8%) and social distancing (29.7%), as compared to the other examined groups (regarding mask wearing, 8.2% and 11.6% respectively, and with regard to social distancing 12.8% and 19.2%) and may require targeted risk communication campaigns to address this population. Furthermore, the study revealed that those that were non-Jewish (as compared to Jewish study counterparts) or that were older (19+) were more vigilant in their protective behavior (29.6% vs. 11.2% respectively for social distancing and 29.6% vs. 11.1% respectively for mask wearing). Despite a successful initial vaccination campaign in Israel, public health officials need to engage all members of the public to unremittingly observe compliance to directed health guidelines, to ensure that the results of previous governmental efforts in fighting the pandemic (such as lockdowns) will be effectively sustained, and the road to containment will be hastened.

scholarly journals Integrated strategies of participatory surveillance to promote flu vaccine coverage in HCWs

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Rizzo ◽  
S Zaffina ◽  
M R Vinci ◽  
A Santoro ◽  
F Gilardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Vaccine Coverage ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Phone Call ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Negative Case ◽  
Flu Vaccine ◽  
Participatory Surveillance

Abstract Problem Influenza represents a threat for healthcare facilities where sudden outbreaks of illness can lead to high morbidity and mortality in vulnerable patients and increase absenteeism in HCWs. Despite WHO recommends annual influenza vaccination of HCWs, flu vaccine coverage (FVC) remain very low in most EU countries. Description of the Problem Despite an important increase in FVC recorded in last years in our hospital, FVC remains under 75%. We pilot a prospective cohort study in HCWs in order to test new methods for influenza vaccination promotion. We create a web-based system integrating information on vaccination status (unvaccinated HCWs, 1/2/3 years vaccinated ones) and demographic data. The Hospital Ethical Committee approved the study. During the 2019/20 influenza season we nested a test-negative case-control study in the cohort to evaluate Influenza vaccine effectiveness against influenza-like-illness (ILI) laboratory confirmed as influenza in HCWs. Results A total of 443 on 2675 HCWs were recruited in the cohort and weekly received specific SMS messages and phone call for a personal invitation to get flu shot. The median age of the cohort was 43,3 (range 21-72) with 128 male (28,9%). In the cohort a FVC of 26/205 (12,7%) was registered in HCWs never vaccinated in the previous 3 seasons. Nasopharyngeal swabs were distributed to 205 subjects for influenza confirmation and they received weekly messages in order to check their health status remanding to self-swab in the case of ILI symptoms. Lessons Using a new and integrated strategy for influenza vaccination promotion in HCWs can increase the FVC. The use of personal direct messages to HCWs and the possibility of confirming or excluding influenza in case of ILI symptoms in those vaccinated and unvaccinated, seems to be very effective in increasing vaccine coverage. Moreover, the cohort could be also used for further research studies as for example the effect of repeated influenza vaccination. Key messages The presented practice appears to be effective and could be applied to larger HCWs population. This strategy could be considered as a good practice of workplace vaccination promotion.

scholarly journals 31. Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Survey of the Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes of Mexican Gynecologists and Family Physicians

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S39-S39
Author(s):  
Erika Z Lopatynsky-Reyes ◽  
Sue Ann Costa-Clemens ◽  
Enrique Chacon-Cruz ◽  
Michael Greenberg
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Vaccine Coverage ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Beliefs And Attitudes ◽  
In Pregnancy

Abstract Background Influenza in pregnancy is associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. Influenza vaccines are both safe and effective in pregnancy, supporting routine use in this population. Even though influenza vaccination in Mexico is recommended for pregnant women, there are no publications of influenza vaccine coverage in pregnancy. This is the first Latin American survey done only in physicians aiming to assess the knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes that Mexican Obstetrics-Gynecologists (OBG) and Family Physicians (FP) have towards influenza and influenza immunization during pregnancy. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted, both paper-based and online. The questionnaire was composed of 35 questions, which addressed general knowledge of influenza, recommendations for vaccination during pregnancy, and beliefs and attitudes concerning the acceptability of the vaccine in pregnant women. Results A total of 206 completed surveys were available, 98 (47.6%) from OBG, 108 (52.4%) from FP. Regarding current practicing medical institutions, 76 (37%), 69 (34%), 31 (14.5%), 30 (14.5%) reported working for the Mexican Institute of Social Security, Private Sector, Secretariat of Health, or a combination of all respectively, representing an estimated 2,472 daily pregnancy consultations. About a quarter (26.2%) reported not having a notion that influenza is more severe among pregnant women. More than half (51.5%) ignored the potential side effects of influenza infection on the fetus. The majority (56.8%) did not know when vaccination during pregnancy should occur. Pregnancy as a risk factor for developing influenza complications was known only in 48.1%. Also, 46.1 % believed that vaccination only confers protection to the mother, but not to the fetus. Nevertheless, 96.1% considered that immunization against influenza during pregnancy is a safe and effective preventive intervention. A results’ summary is shown in Figure-1. Conclusion Based on this survey, current knowledge of OBG and FP for influenza morbidity and mortality during pregnancy, and the importance of influenza vaccination in pregnant women, is poor. Mandatory recommendations to educate medical providers regarding influenza vaccination during pregnancy in Mexico are necessary, even as imperative for CME credits. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Mortality due to respiratory diseases in the elderly after influenza vaccination campaigns in the Federal District, Brazil, 1996-2009

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisca Magalhães Scoralick ◽  
Luciana Paganini Piazzolla ◽  
Liana Laura Pires ◽  
Cleudsom Neri ◽  
Wladimir Kummer de Paula
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Federal District ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Proportional Mortality

OBJECTIVE: To compare mortality rates due to respiratory diseases among elderly individuals residing in the Federal District of Brasília, Brazil, prior to and after the implementation of a national influenza vaccination campaign. METHODS: This was an ecological time series analysis. Data regarding the population of individuals who were over 60 years of age between 1996 and 2009 were obtained from official databases. The variables of interest were the crude mortality rate (CMR), the mortality rate due to the respiratory disease (MRRD), and the proportional mortality ratio (PMR) for respiratory diseases. We performed a qualitative analysis of the data for the period prior to and after the implementation of the vaccination campaign (1996-1999 and 2000-2009, respectively). RESULTS: The CMR increased with advancing age. Over the course of the study period, we observed reductions in the CMR in all of the age brackets studied, particularly among those aged 80 years or older. Reductions in the MRRD were also found in all of the age groups, especially in those aged 80 years or older. In addition, there was a decrease in the PMR for respiratory diseases in all age groups throughout the study period. The most pronounced decrease in the PMR for respiratory diseases in the ≥ 70 year age bracket occurred in 2000 (immediately following the implementation of the national vaccination campaign); in 2001, that rate increased in all age groups, despite the greater adherence to the vaccination campaign in comparison with that recorded for 2000. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination appears to have a positive impact on the prevention of mortality due to respiratory diseases, particularly in the population aged 70 or over.

scholarly journals Morbidity and mortality after fragility hip fracture in a Saudi Arabian population: Report from a single center

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 1175-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mir Sadat-Ali ◽  
Moaad Alfaraidy ◽  
Abdulaziz AlHawas ◽  
Ahmed Abdallah Al-Othman ◽  
Dakheel A Al-Dakheel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Fragility Hip Fracture ◽  
Asa Score ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
American Society

Objective To determine the functional morbidity and mortality after fragility hip fracture and compare the mortality with three other common diseases. Methods Data were collected from patients admitted to King Fahd Hospital of the University, AlKhobar from January 2010 to December 2014. Demographic data included the preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score as assessed by the anesthetist and the type of surgery. Personal and telephone interviews were performed, and data were entered into a database and analyzed. Results We identified 203 patients with fragility proximal femoral fractures, and the data of 189 patients (109 male, 80 female; average age, 66.90 ± 13.43 years) were available for analysis. The overall mortality rate was 26.98% (51 patients). The mortality rate was significantly higher among patients with an ASA score of 4 (36.36%) than 1 (20.45%). With respect to morbidity, only 48.23% of patients were able to return to their pre-fracture status; 32.35% of those who required assisted walking and 83.4% of those who required a wheelchair became bedridden. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that patients with fragility hip fractures have high morbidity and a mortality rate approaching 30%. Age and the ASA score significantly influence this high mortality rate.

A Successful Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Campaign Using an Innovative Electronic Tracking System

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1137-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara N. Palmore ◽  
J. Patrick Vandersluis ◽  
Joan Morris ◽  
Angela Michelin ◽  
Lisa M. Ruprecht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Tracking System ◽  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Dramatic Improvement ◽  
Patient Contact ◽  
Hospital Policy ◽  
Vaccination Rates ◽  
Clinical Center

Background.Although influenza vaccination of healthcare workers reduces influenza-like illness and overall mortality among patients, national rates of vaccination for healthcare providers are unacceptably low. We report the implementation of a new mandatory vaccination policy by means of a streamlined electronic enrollment and vaccination tracking system at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center.Objective.To evaluate the outcome of a new mandatory staff influenza vaccination program.Methods.A new hospital policy endorsed by all the component NIH institutes and the Clinical Center departments mandated that employees who have patient contact either be vaccinated annually against influenza or sign a declination specifying the reason(s) for refusal. Those who fail to comply would be required to appear before the Medical Executive Committee to explain their rationale. We collected in a database the names of all physician and nonphysician staff who had patient contact. When a staff member either was vaccinated or declined vaccination, a simple system of badge scanning and bar-coded data entry captured essential data. The database was continuously updated, and it provided a list of noncompliant employees with whom to follow up.Results.By February 12, 2009, all 2,754 identified patient-care employees either were vaccinated or formally declined vaccination. Among those, 2,424 (88%) were vaccinated either at the NIH or elsewhere, 36 (1.3%) reported medical contraindications, and 294 (10.7%) declined vaccination for other reasons. Among the 294 employees without medical contraindications who declined, the most frequent reason given for declination was concern about side effects.Conclusions.Implementation of a novel vaccination tracking process and a hospital policy requiring influenza vaccination or declination yielded dramatic improvement in healthcare worker vaccination rates and likely will result in increased patient safety in our hospital.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document