scholarly journals Plasmatic MMP9 released from tumor-infiltrating neutrophils is predictive for bevacizumab efficacy in glioblastoma patients: an AVAglio ancillary study

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carine Jiguet-Jiglaire ◽  
Sebastien Boissonneau ◽  
Emilie Denicolai ◽  
Victoria Hein ◽  
Romain Lasseur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Inflammatory Cells ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Post Hoc

AbstractWe previously identified matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 plasma levels as candidate biomarkers of bevacizumab activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of MMP2 and MMP9 in a randomized phase III trial in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and to explore their tumor source. In this post hoc analysis of the AVAglio trial (AVAGlio/NCT00943826), plasma samples from 577 patients (bevacizumab, n = 283; placebo, n = 294) were analyzed for plasma MMP9 and MMP2 levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A prospective local cohort of 38 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma was developed for analysis of tumor characteristics by magnetic resonance imaging and measurement of plasma and tumor levels of MMP9 and MMP2. In this AVAglio study, MMP9, but not MMP2, was correlated with bevacizumab efficacy. Patients with low MMP9 derived a significant 5.2-month overall survival (OS) benefit with bevacizumab (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34–0.76, p = 0.0009; median 13.6 vs. 18.8 months). In multivariate analysis, a significant interaction was seen between treatment and MMP9 (p = 0.03) for OS. In the local cohort, we showed that preoperative MMP9 plasma levels decreased after tumor resection and were correlated with tumor levels of MMP9 mRNA (p = 0.03). However, plasma MMP9 was not correlated with tumor size, invasive pattern, or angiogenesis. Using immunohistochemistry, we showed that MMP9 was expressed by inflammatory cells but not by tumor cells. After cell sorting, we showed that MMP9 was expressed by CD45+ immune cells. Finally, using flow cytometry, we showed that MMP9 was expressed by tumor-infiltrating neutrophils. In conclusion, circulating MMP9 is predictive of bevacizumab efficacy and is released by tumor-infiltrating neutrophils.

EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8: A phase III trial of marizomib in combination with standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy versus standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2072-TPS2072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Roth ◽  
Jaap C. Reijneveld ◽  
Thierry Gorlia ◽  
Frederic Dhermain ◽  
Filip Yves Francine Leon De Vos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

TPS2072 Background: The standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma comprises maximum safe surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and concomitant and up to six cycles of maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). Despite this intense therapy, the prognosis remains poor and there is an urgent need to develop new therapeutic options. Marizomib is a novel, irreversible and brain-penetrant pan-proteasome inhibitor. Following its successful assessment in phase I trials in patients with newly diagnosed as well as recurrent glioblastoma, marizomib is now being investigated in a phase III trial. Methods: EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label phase III superiority trial. Eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a performance status ≥70. Approximately a total of 750 patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1. Stratification factors include institution, age, Karnofsky performance status and extent of surgery. The primary objective of this study is to compare overall survival in patients receiving marizomib in addition to standard of care (TMZ/RT→TMZ) with patients receiving standard treatment only. The testing strategy specifies the determination of this objective in both the intent-to-treat population and the subgroup of patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, safety, neurocognitive function and quality of life. The study is accompanied by a translational research program. The study will be opened at 50 EORTC sites in Europe and done as an intergroup collaboration with the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) with 25 sites in Canada and additional sites in the US. Patient enrolment started in June 2018 and as of January 29, 2019, a total of 85 patients have been randomized. An update on the enrolment status will be provided at the ASCO conference. Clinical trial information: NCT03345095.

Updated safety/feasibility study of concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) and radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14535-e14535
Author(s):  
Rachel Grossman ◽  
Felix Bokstein ◽  
Deborah T. Blumenthal ◽  
Dror Limon ◽  
Carmit Ben Harush ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

e14535 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), a non-invasive, loco-regional, anti-mitotic treatment comprises low-intensity alternating electric fields. In the phase III EF-14 study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM), TTFields in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) significantly improved survival compared to TMZ alone. In preclinical studies TTFields had a radiosensitizing effect and increased the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT). This pilot study [NCT03780569] evaluated the feasibility and safety of TTFields administered concurrently with RT and TMZ in ndGBM patients. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed ndGBM were treated with TTFields/RT/TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ/TTFields. TTFields (200 kHz) were delivered for ≥18 hours/day with transducer arrays removed during RT delivery. RT was administered to the tumor bed in 30 fractions (total dose 60 Gy) in combination with daily TMZ (75 mg/m2). In the adjuvant phase, patients received monthly TMZ (150–200 mg/m2 for 5 days) plus TTFields. The primary outcome was safety of the combined therapies; secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were graded per CTCAE v4.0. Results: Ten patients were enrolled at a single center between April and December 2017. Median age was 60.2 years, median Karnofsky Performance Score was 90.0, and eight (80%) patients were male. Five (50%) patients had undergone tumor resection while the remainder had biopsy only. Eight patients experienced ≥1 RT treatment delay; delays were unrelated to TTFields treatment. All patients experienced ≥1 AE. Three patients suffered from serious AEs (urinary tract infection, confusional state, and decubitus ulcer) that were considered unrelated to TTFields. The most common AE was skin toxicity, reported in eight (80%) patients; all were of low severity (CTCAE grade 1–2) and were reported as related to TTFields treatment. Median PFS from enrollment was 8.9 months; median OS was not reached at the time of study closure. Conclusions: Eighty percent of patients experienced grade 1–2 TTFields-related skin toxicity. No other TTFields-related toxicities were observed and there was no increase in RT- or TMZ-related toxicities as a result of combining TTFields with these therapies. Based on the safety and preliminary efficacy results of this pilot study, a phase 2 randomized trial (N = 60; NCT03869242) and the Phase 3 TRIDENT trial have been initiated to further investigate the efficacy of concomitant RT/TMZ/TTFields in ndGBM. Clinical trial information: NCT03780569.

scholarly journals P14.124 EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8: A phase III trial of marizomib in combination with standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy versus standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii98-iii98 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Roth ◽  
J Reijneveld ◽  
T Gorlia ◽  
F Dhermain ◽  
F De Vos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract BACKGROUND The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes maximal debulking surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT), and concomitant as well as maintenance therapy with the alkylating agent, temozolomide (TMZ). However, the prognosis remains poor and novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Targeting the proteasome has been considered a promising anti-cancer approach for several years. Marizomib is a novel, irreversible and pan-proteasome inhibitor, which crosses the blood-brain barrier and has been assessed in phase I trials in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 is a randomized, controlled, open label phase III superiority trial. Patients with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a performance status >70 are eligible. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive standard of care (TMZ/RT→TMZ) alone or TMZ/RT→TMZ plus marizomib. The study aims at enrolling 750 patients. Stratification factors include study site, age, performance status and extent of resection. The primary objective of this trial is to compare overall survival in patients receiving marizomib in addition to standard of care with those receiving standard treatment only. The testing strategy specifies the determination of this objective in the intent-to-treat population as well as the subgroup of patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, safety, neurocognitive function and quality of life. A translational research program has been set up. The study will be activated at approximately 50 EORTC sites across Europe, 25 sites in Canada and additional sites in the US. Patient recruitment started in June 2018 and as of April 29, 2019, a total of 164 patients have been randomized. An update on the enrolment status will be provided at the EANO meeting. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03345095

scholarly journals NIMG-37. DELAYED PSEUDOPROGRESSION IN TWO PATIENTS UNDERGOING TTFIELDS TREATMENT FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii155-ii156
Author(s):  
Allison Lowman ◽  
Sarah Hurrell ◽  
Samuel Bobholz ◽  
Jennifer Connelly ◽  
Elizabeth Cochran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Specific Effects ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

Abstract PURPOSE Tumor treatment fields (TTFields) are approved by the FDA for newly diagnosed as well as recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). TTFields have been shown to extend survival by 4.9 months in newly diagnosed GBM, and a landmark overall survival rate of 13% at 5 years. However, the specific effects remain widely unknown, which has prevented widespread clinical use of this treatment. METHODS This case study examines two glioblastoma patients, IDH-1 wildtype, MGMT unmethylated, that received TTFields (Optune) in addition to maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) following radiation (RT). Both cases were followed using standard MR imaging. Second resections were performed due to radiographic progression of contrast enhancement. RESULTS Although imaging was concerning for tumor progression, pathology showed only treatment effect, ultimately leading to the diagnosis of pseudoprogression. Both patients fell outside the normal expected timeline for chemo-radiation induced pseudoprogression. Based on the pathology, both patients resumed treatment with TMZ/TTFields. One patient expired at 25 months and one is still alive. CONCLUSIONS Pathologic confirmation was essential for guiding further treatment and allowed patients to continue treatment that was effective despite contrary indications on imaging. These findings suggest that pathological confirmation should be strongly considered in patients receiving TMZ/TTFields who develop radiographic progression, potentially with a less invasive biopsy procedure. Future studies should look to characterize the underlying mechanism of interaction between TTFields/TMZ and quantify the prevalence, associated risk factors and whether there is a genotype more susceptible. Both patients reported here had O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) unmethylated GBM, and while about 60% of glioblastomas are diagnosed likewise, it is possible that MGMT methylation status plays a role in TTFields response. Better characterization of this phenomenon will improve treatment guidance, potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries and the discontinuance of successful therapies.

OC-0333 Dose-painting multicenter phase III trial in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: the SPECTRO-GLIO trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S246-S247
Author(s):  
A. Laprie ◽  
G. Noel ◽  
L. Chaltiel ◽  
G. Truc ◽  
M. Sunyach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Dose Painting ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

scholarly journals P14.71 Tumor Treating Fields combined with radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: final safety and efficacy results from a pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii84-iii84
Author(s):  
R Grossman ◽  
F Bokstein ◽  
D Blumenthal ◽  
C Ben Harush ◽  
D Limon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Sensitizing Effect

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, loco-regional, anti-mitotic treatment consisting of low intensity alternating electric fields. The combination of TTFields with maintenance temozolomide significantly improved survival versus temozolomide alone in the phase 3 EF-14 study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). In preclinical studies, TTFields increased the number of glioma cells undergoing cellular death following radiotherapy (RT) by inhibiting DNA damage repair, suggesting a radio-sensitizing effect of TTFields. This pilot study is the first to evaluate the safety and feasibility of administering TTFields concomitant to RT and TMZ in ndGBM patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with ndGBM were treated with TTFields/RT/TMZ followed by maintenance TMZ and TTFields for up to 24 months. TTFields (200kHz) were delivered for >18 hours/day while the transducer arrays were removed during delivery of RT. TMZ was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2/daily for 6 weeks and RT at a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was safety of the combined TTFields/RT/TMZ; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to CTCAE V4.0. RESULTS 10 ndGBM patients that recovered from maximal debulking surgery or biopsy were enrolled at a single center in Israel between April and December 2017. Five patients (50%) had undergone gross total resection while the rest had biopsy only. Eight of the patients were male, median age was 59, median KPS was 80 and median dose of RT was 60 Gy. Six patients (60%) reported at least one AE. The most common AE was TTFields-related skin toxicity, reported in four patients (40%), all of which were grade 1–2 in severity. Two patients reported serious AEs (seizures and general deterioration) that were considered unrelated to TTFields. Median PFS with RT/TMZ/TTFields was 10.5 months. Median OS has not yet been reached. CONCLUSION The proportion of patients with TTFields-related skin toxicity was similar to that reported in ndGBM patients in the randomized Phase III study (52%), where patients started TTFields at least 4 weeks after RT. No other TTFields-related toxicities were reported and there were no increase in RT- or TMZ-related toxicities as a result of combining TTFields with RT in addition to TMZ. Based on the safety and preliminary efficacy results of this pilot study, a phase II randomized study has been initiated to investigate the efficacy of concomitant RT/TMZ/TTFields in 60 ndGBM patients.

Phase I trial of vatalanib (PTK787) in combination with standard radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2035-2035
Author(s):  
T. Batchelor ◽  
A. F. Eichler ◽  
S. R. Plotkin ◽  
J. Drappatz ◽  
P. Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Diagnostic Biopsy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

2035 Background: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are hypothesized to work synergistically with chemotherapy and radiation (RT). Vatalanib (MW 347, T1/2 4.6 h) is an oral, pan-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Methods: This phase I study was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose of vatalanib in combination with RT and TMZ for patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were taking enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs. RT and TMZ were administered at standard doses. Vatalanib was initiated 5 days prior to the start of RT and continued daily until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity or a maximum of up to 12 cycles of post-RT TMZ. Cohorts of 3 patients were treated during RT and TMZ at doses of 250mg daily, 250mg BID, or 500mg BID of vatalanib. Following the completion of RT, patients were treated with vatalanib 750mg BID for the remainder of the study. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled of which 17 took 5 or more days of vatalanib (1 patient withdrew consent prior to start of vatalanib and 1 withdrew consent after only 1 dose). The median age was 58 and the median KPS was 90. Eight patients had a diagnostic biopsy only. The MTD has not been reached. Potentially related grade 3–4 toxicities included elevated transaminases (2 patients), thrombocytopenia (1 patient), leukopenia (1 patient), neutropenia (1 patient), depressed level of consciousness (1 patient), and fatigue (1 patient). Only 1 patient suffered an asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and no patient experienced wound dehiscence or infection. Five patients remain on vatalanib and the median follow-up for all patients is 6.5 months. Seven patients have died. The best responses for the 13 patients who completed combination RT/TMZ/vatalanib was 2 PR, 7 SD, and 2 PD. Two patients were clinically stable with biopsy proven pseudoprogression. Median PFS is 18.4+ months and OS has not been reached. Conclusions: Vatalanib is safe and well tolerated when added to standard RT and TMZ. The MTD has not been reached and dose escalation continues in this population of patients on enzyme inducing anti-epileptic drugs. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document