scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Talazoparib for Patients With Operable Breast Cancer With a Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variant

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 388-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Litton ◽  
Marion E. Scoggins ◽  
Kenneth R. Hess ◽  
Beatriz E. Adrada ◽  
Rashmi K. Murthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Pathogenic Variant ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Talazoparib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with BRCA-positive metastatic breast cancer. This study evaluated the pathologic response of talazoparib alone for 6 months in patients with a known germline BRCA pathogenic variant (g BRCA-positive) and operable breast cancer. METHODS Eligibility included 1 cm or larger invasive tumor and g BRCA-positive disease. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive tumors were excluded. Twenty patients underwent a pretreatment biopsy, 6 months of once per day oral talazoparib (1 mg), followed by definitive surgery. Patients received adjuvant therapy at physician’s discretion. The primary end point was residual cancer burden (RCB). With 20 patients, the RCB-0 plus RCB-I response rate can be estimated with a 95% CI with half width less than 20%. RESULTS Twenty patients were enrolled from August 2016 to September 2017. Median age was 38 years (range, 23 to 58 years); 16 patients were g BRCA1 positive and 4 patients were g BRCA2 positive. Fifteen patients had triple-negative breast cancer (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor < 10%), and five had hormone receptor-positive disease. Five patients had clinical stage I disease, 12 had stage II, and three had stage III, including one patient with inflammatory breast carcinoma and one with metaplastic chondrosarcomatous carcinoma. One patient chose to receive chemotherapy before surgery and was not included in RCB analyses. RCB-0 (pathologic complete response) rate was 53% and RCB-0/I was 63%. Eight patients (40%) had grade 3 anemia and required a transfusion, three patients had grade 3 neutropenia, and 1 patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Common grade 1 or 2 toxicities were nausea, fatigue, neutropenia, alopecia, dizziness, and dyspnea. Toxicities were managed by dose reduction and transfusions. Nine patients required dose reduction. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant single-agent oral talazoparib once per day for 6 months without chemotherapy produced substantial RCB-0 rate with manageable toxicity. The substantive pathologic response to single-agent talazoparib supports the larger, ongoing neoadjuvant trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03499353 ).

Safety and antitumor activity of 3-weekly anti-EpCAM antibody adecatumumab (MT201) in combination with docetaxel for patients with metastatic breast cancer: Results of a multicenter phase Ib trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1009-1009
Author(s):  
M. Sebastian ◽  
C. Hanusch ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
N. Marschner ◽  
D. Oruzio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Epcam Expression ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Grade 3

1009 Background: The fully human IgG1 antibody adecatumumab (MT201) binds to the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), which is expressed in over 90% of breast cancers and has been associated with poor prognosis. Data from a previous phase II study in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) indicated that single agent MT201 could prolong progression-free survival in a subset of patients with high EpCAM expression. This study tested safety and tolerability of MT201 treatment in combination with standard docetaxel. Methods: Relapsed or primary refractory, EpCAM-positive MBC patients were treated with docetaxel (100 mg/m2 q21d) in combination with MT201 (dose levels 180 mg/m2, and 550 mg/m2 q21d). A loading dose of 100 mg/m2 and 300 mg/m2, respectively, was administered on day 1 and 7. Patients were grouped into high- and low-level EpCAM expression. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability; anti-tumor activity according to RECIST was a secondary objective. Results: A total of 22 patients with a median of 3 prior chemotherapy lines were enrolled. Most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in all patients were leucopenia (90%), neutropenia (77%), lymphopenia (68%), and diarrhea (23%). No evidence for aggravation of grade 3/4 toxicities typically associated with docetaxel was found. The dose level 550 mg/m2 q21d has been determined as MTD in combination with 100 mg/m2 q21d docetaxel. The overall response rate (CR/PR; RECIST) and clinical benefit rate (CR/PR and SD>24wks) in all evaluable patients was 24% and 41%, respectively. Patients with high EpCAM expression showed a response rate of 43%, whereas patients with low EpCAM expression had a response rate of 10%. Median time-to-progression (TTP) in all evaluable patients was 165 days. Conclusions: Combining MT201 with docetaxel for the treatment of MBC appears to be safe and feasible. The DLT of this combination were short and manageable episodes of grade 3 diarrhea. The response rate and TTP observed in this heavily pre-treated population is encouraging and warrant further development of MT201/chemotherapy combinations in patients with tumors of high EpCAM target level. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABX)) + capecitabine (XEL) in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1053-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. G. Somer ◽  
L. S. Schwartzberg ◽  
F. Arena ◽  
A. Epperson ◽  
D. Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

1053 Background: ABX and XEL both have substantial single agent activity in MBC. Taxane and anti-metabolite doublets improve response rate and TTP and longer survival. ABX administered weekly has an excellent safety and efficacy profile with maintenance of dose intensity. This study was designed to test the safety and efficacy of ABX + XEL given in a novel combination schedule. Methods: This phase II, multicenter open label study utilized ABX 125 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and with no premeds and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 PO BID days 1–14 on a Q 3 week cycle. The primary endpoint is objective response rate, with evaluation performed after every 2 cycles. Entry criteria include measurable MBC by RECIST criteria, age >18, PS 0–2, no prior chemo for metastatic disease, > 6 months since adjuvant fluoropyrimidine and/or paclitaxel. Results: The full sample of 50 patients (pts) have been enrolled; data from 43 pts are available for analysis. Median age is 58 (range 23.7–90.6). 37% received prior adjuvant anthracycline and 33% prior adjuvant taxane. Median number of metastatic sites is 2 (range 1–7), with most common sites of disease liver, 53.5%; bone, 51.2%; and lung, 14%. 226 cycles of therapy have been delivered. 5 pts required a dose reduction in XEL (3 pts to 650 mg/m2; 2 to 550 mg/m2) and 4 pts had dose reduction in ABX to 100 mg/m2. XEL dose reductions occurred due to hand-foot syndrome (3), neutropenia (1), and fatigue (1). ABX dose reductions occurred due to mucositis, diarrhea, fatigue, and neuropathy (1 pt each). 10 pts had grade 3–4 non-hematologic AEs: 3 hand-foot syndrome, 4 fatigue, and 3 GI. Hematologic AEs included 4 with grade 3 and 1 with grade 4 neutropenia, and 2 with grade 4 febrile neutropenia. The most common AEs of any grade were GI (30), dermatological (23), fatigue (15), neuropathy (12), and hand-foot syndrome (11). The incidence of Grade 1–2 neuropathy was 25% (no grade 3–4). Of 38 pts available for analysis of response, the overall response rate is 47.5%: PR 39.5%, CR 8%. Total of 15 pts have stable disease, 20 pts have completed 6+ cycles. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Neoadjuvant dose-dense sequential biweekly epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and trastuzumab for HER2+ operable breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 595-595
Author(s):  
L. Blakely ◽  
B. Somer ◽  
M. Keaton ◽  
R. Hermann ◽  
F. Schnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Q 14

595 Background: Neoadjuvant (Neo) chemotherapy (CT) with trastuzumab (H) improves pathologic complete response (pCR) rate for HER2+ breast cancer. Dose-dense regimens improve outcome in the adjuvant setting but have not been fully evaluated as preoperative therapy. We designed this regimen to utilize full doses of active agents including docetaxel (T) and H in a novel biweekly schedule to explore efficacy and safety. Methods: Patients (pts) with biopsy proven, clinical stage IIA-IIIC, noninflammatory breast cancer were eligible. HER2+ by FISH was determined locally. CT consisted of epirubicin (E) 100 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m2 Q 14 days x 4 followed by T 75 mg/m2 and H 6 mg/kg loading dose, then 4 mg/kg Q 14 days x 4, all with pegfilgrastim support. Surgery was scheduled 20–24 weeks from start after a fifth cycle of H 4mg/kg. EF was measured prior to CT, after EC, after TH and at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Additional adjuvant H to complete 1 year of therapy by conventional schedule was recommended after surgery. The primary endpoint was pCR for invasive cancer in breast and lymph nodes. Results: 30 pts were enrolled at 5 centers: median age was 50.1 (range, 31–72); ethnicity African-American 14, Caucasian 14, other 2; clinical stage IIA, 14, IIB, 4, IIIA, 7, IIIB/C, 5; ER+ 18, PR+ 14; grade 3, 21 and grade 2, 8. Twenty eight pts were evaluable for pathologic response- 2 withdrew before completing treatment, 1 for toxicity. Dose delivery on schedule was >95% for all drugs. Clinical response prior to surgery was cCR 20; cPR 5; and stable 2 pts. Pathologic response: pCR 16 (57%) including 4 with residual DCIS only; 9 pPR, and 2 stable. Mean EF was 63.1 (range, 51–81) before treatment, 62.4 (49–75) after EC and 58.3 (35–74) after TH. Two pts had EF <50% during Neo, one with clinical CHF and 1 additional pt developed CHF during adjuvant single agent H. Both pts had symptomatic improvement with cessation of H. Adverse events were generally mild with 14 grade 3 AEs including 3 episodes of dyspnea and no grade 3 skin toxicity or any grade 4 toxicity noted. Conclusions: Sequential Neo dose-dense Q 14 day EC followed by Q 14 day TH yields a high pCR rate in HER2+ breast cancer with acceptable toxicity profile and no new safety signals noted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Dose-intensive vinorelbine with concurrent granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1395-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
R B Livingston ◽  
G K Ellis ◽  
J R Gralow ◽  
M A Williams ◽  
R White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE We evaluated weekly single-agent intravenous (IV) vinorelbine as salvage therapy for metastatic breast cancer. After the first five patients, all received elective growth factor support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) in an attempt to maximize delivered dose-intensity (DDI). Objective tumor response, DDI, and toxicity were assessed, as well as time to progression (TTP) and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS This single-center nonrandomized trial enrolled 40 patients. Anthracycline exposure and subsequent progression were common to all patients, and 38 of 40 were paclitaxel-refractory. Vinorelbine was given initially at 30 mg/m2/wk, then at 35 mg/m2/wk in a phase I/II design, which involved first intermittent (6 days of 7) and then continuous (daily) administration of G-CSF at 5 micrograms/kg. RESULTS The maximum-tolerated starting dose was 35 mg/m2/wk with continuous G-CSF support. The mean DDI was 27.7 mg/m2/wk for all patients. There were two complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs) in 40 assessable patients for an overall response rate of 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13% to 41%). The median TTP was 13 weeks and median survival time 33 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, with dose delay or reduction required in 14 of 27 patients entered at 35 mg/m2. Febrile neutropenia that required hospitalization was unusual (three of 40 patients, 8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in nine patients (23%) and 26 patients (65%) required RBC transfusions for anemia. Seven patients (18%) had reversible grade 3/4 nonhematologic complications, primarily related to neurotoxicity. Grade > or = 3 mucositis was absent. CONCLUSION Concurrent administration of weekly vinoralbine and daily G-CSF is feasible and permits an increase in DDI for vinorelbine of 43% to 76% over that reported in series without growth factor support. The response rate, TTP, and survival data are encouraging for therapy given to heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Vinorelbine is not cross-resistant with paclitaxel and should be considered for further trials in the dose-intensified mode made possible by G-CSF, alone or combined with other agents.

Randomized Phase II Trial of First-Line Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel and Capecitabine Compared With Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel inHER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Wardley ◽  
Xavier Pivot ◽  
Flavia Morales-Vasquez ◽  
Luis M. Zetina ◽  
Maria de Fátima Dias Gaui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate trastuzumab (H) and docetaxel (T) with or without capecitabine (X) as first-line combination therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to H (8 mg/kg loading; 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) plus T (75 mg/m2in HTX arm, 100 mg/m2in HT arm, every 3 weeks) with or without X (950 mg/m2twice per day on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).ResultsIn 222 patients, median follow-up was approximately 24 months. ORR was high with both regimens (70.5% with HTX; 72.7% with HT; P = .717); complete response rate was 23.2% with HTX compared with 16.4% with HT. HTX demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival: median 17.9 months compared with 12.8 months with HT (hazard ratio, 0.72; P = .045), which translates to a gain of around 5 months. Two-year survival probability was 75% with HTX compared with 66% with HT. Febrile neutropenia (27% v 15%) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (77% v 54%) incidences were higher with HT than HTX. Treatment-related grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (17% v < 1%) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (11% v 4%) occurred more commonly with HTX than HT. One case of congestive heart failure occurred in each arm.ConclusionHTX is an effective and feasible first-line therapy for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, although it should be reserved for patients with good performance status who are not receiving long-term steroids.

Phase II study of goserelin for patients with postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1529-1535 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Saphner ◽  
A B Troxel ◽  
D C Tormey ◽  
D Neuberg ◽  
N J Robert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Before And After

PURPOSE To determine the response rate of postmenopausal breast cancer patients to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GN-RH) agonist, Zoladex (goserelin; ICI Pharma, Wilmington, DE). PATIENTS AND METHODS A multi-institutional single-agent trial in postmenopausal patients was conducted. Serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone, and estradiol were requested before and after Zoladex treatment. RESULTS For estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) patients, the response rate was 11%, with one complete response (CR) and three partial responses (PRs) among 36 eligible patients. Responses were of short duration. There were no responses among 16 estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) patients. CONCLUSION GN-RH agonists have activity in ER+ postmenopausal patients, but response rates are not as high as with other available endocrine therapies and the duration of response is short.

SDX-105 Demonstrates a High Response Rate as a Single-Agent with Acceptable Safety in Rituximab-Refractory, Relpased Indolent or Transformed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2480-2480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Friedberg ◽  
Philip Cohen ◽  
Robert O. Kerr ◽  
K. Sue Robinson ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Cell Death Pathway ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract SDX-105 (Treanda™, Bendamustine HCl) is an alkylating agent that may exert its anti-tumor activity via mitotic catastrophe, an apoptosis-independent cell-death pathway, as well as, through apoptosis. Its cytotoxic potency is unattenuated in chemotherapy-resistant lymphoma cell lines. We initiated a multi-center Phase II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of SDX-105 in patients with rituximab-refractory, relapsed indolent or transformed B cell NHL. Patients must have pathologically-confirmed disease that has been demonstrated to be rituximab-refractory (no response or progression within 6 months) or must be intolerant of rituximab. Other requirements include measurable disease, adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function (ANC ≥1K/mm3, platelet ≥ 100K/mm3, except in cases of &gt;50% NHL in bone marrow), up to 3 prior chemotherapies, and no prior allogeneic transplant. Patients receive SDX-105, 120 mg/m2 IV over 30–60 min, days 1 and 2, every 21 days. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity during a cycle results in dose reduction for subsequent cycles (to 90 mg/m2 and then to 60 mg/m2). Patients achieving stable disease or better after 6 cycles may receive up to 6 more cycles. 49 patients have been accrued to date with data available on the first 15 patients. The median age is 69 yrs (range 47–84), 47% male, median 6 yrs since diagnosis with NHL. Histologies: 10 follicular (6 Grade 1, 3 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3), 2 SLL, 1 marginal zone and 2 transformed NHL. Other features include: 93% Stage III/IV, 20% with B symptoms, 87% with extranodal disease, median 2 prior chemotherapies with 40% not responding to last chemotherapy. 4 patients have required dose reduction to 90 mg/m2 and 2 patients have withdrawn prior to completing 6 cycles due to treatment-associated toxicity. The current overall response rate (ORR) based upon best response in the intent-to-treat population is 80% (CR/CRu 20%, PR 60%). Overall 73% of patients experienced a related non-hematologic adverse event (AE), of which 20% were Grade 3 and 0% Grade 4. The most frequent AEs were nausea (40%), vomiting (27%), fatigue (33%), anorexia (20%), and constipation (20%). Alopecia was not observed. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was seen in 53% (neutropenia), 20% (thrombocytopenia), and 13% (anemia) of patients. 4 patients experienced serious AEs, including 1 patient with baseline renal insufficiency who died on study from renal failure and pulmonary edema; other events include admissions for fever and anemia, urinary tract infection, and dehydration. Based upon these preliminary findings, SDX-105 demonstrates a high overall response rate with acceptable hematologic toxicity and modest non-hematologic toxicity in a relapsed lymphoma patient population, many of whom are refractory to rituximab-chemotherapy combinations. An additional study evaluating the combination of SDX-105 and rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent NHL who are rituximab-sensitive is also ongoing.

Triple Negative Breast Cancer Pathologic Diagnosis and Current Chemotherapy Treatment Options

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Bernardo L Rapoport ◽  
Simon Nayler ◽  
Georgia S Demetriou ◽  
Shun D Moodley ◽  
Carol A Benn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Pathologic Diagnosis ◽  
Metastatic Setting

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises 12–20 % of all breast cancers and are a heterogeneous group of tumors, both clinically and pathologically. These cancers are characterized by the lack of expression of the hormone receptors estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), combined with the lack of either overexpression or amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2)gene. Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and DNA damaging agents continue to be the mainstay of treatment of this disease in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting. The lack of predictive markers in identifying potential targets for the treatment of TNBC has left a gap in directed therapy in these patients. Platinum agents have seen renewed interest in TNBC based on an increasing body of preclinical and clinical data suggesting encouraging activity. However, comparisons between chemotherapy regimens are mostly retrospective in nature and the best agents or drug combinations for TNBC have not been established in prospective randomized trials. Numerous studies have now shown that TNBC has significantly higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates compared with hormone receptor positive breast cancer when treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and pCR correlates well with better outcomes for these patients. Patients with TNBC account for a larger number of deaths in the setting of metastatic breast cancer. There is no preferred treatment for the first-line metastatic setting. Although individual agents are recommended, given the often aggressive nature of TNBC and the presence of extensive visceral disease, the use of a combination of drugs, rather than a single agent, is often advocated. This review article will outline the pathologic diagnosis of TNBC and the treatment options available to these patients in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting, including an assessment of future directions of treatment.

Nanoparticle albumin-bound (Nab) paclitaxel (P) in combination with bevacizumab (B) with and without gemcitabine (G): Early experience at the Braman Family Breast Cancer Institute

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10748-10748
Author(s):  
C. F. Lobo ◽  
G. Lopes ◽  
O. Silva ◽  
S. Gluck
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Hemorrhagic Complication ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

10748 Background: Nab-P improves outcomes when compared against single agent cremophor-based P, as does the addition of bevacizumab or gemcitabine to the same agent. There are no available data regarding combinations of Nab-P with B and/or G. Ongoing investigational efforts are evaluating various doublets with these agents, but, to the best of our knowledge, not all 3 of them in the same regimen. All drugs are currently FDA-approved in the treatment of breast cancer. Methods: Review of single-institution experience, evaluating safety and preliminary evidence of activity with the use of Nab-P and B with and without G in heavily pretreated her2neu negative metastatic breast cancer patients. Assessment of response was undertaken by the investigators independently of treating physician. RECIST criteria were used. Three patients received Nab-P and B at the following doses: Nab-P 100 mg/m2, B 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, and 2 patients received all 3 drugs as follows: Nab-P 100 mg/m2, G 1,000 mg/m2, B 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Results: Five women have been evaluated. Median age was 51 (range 34–69). Two patients had hormone-receptor positive disease and 3 had ER/PR/Her2neu-negative cancer. Prior number of regimens was 3 (range 2–7). Four patients had been treated with a taxane. One received both paclitaxel and docetaxel, and 3 docetaxel only. A median of 5 cycles have been administered (range 3–9). First-cycle grade 3/4 toxicity was seen in only one patient who had a baseline grade 2 thrombocytopenia that progressed to grade 3. The thrombocytopenia resolved without requiring transfusion and without any hemorrhagic complication. Another patient developed grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. Two patients are not yet assessable for response. At time of first evaluation 1 patient had progressive disease (Nab-P, B; 7 prior lines of treatment), one had stable disease (Nab-P, B, G; 3 prior lines of therapy, including docetaxel), and 1 had a partial response (Nab-P, B, G; 2 prior therapies, including docetaxel). Conclusions: These very preliminary data suggest that Nab-P in combination with B with and without G is a safe regimen and formal Phase I/II trials are being developed to confirm its clinical activity. [Table: see text]

Gemcitabine and docetaxel combination regimen in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1107-1107
Author(s):  
D. Karacetin ◽  
O. Maral ◽  
O. Aksakal ◽  
B. Okten ◽  
B. Yalçın ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Grade 3

1107 Background: No standart chemotherapy regimen has been estabilished for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The gemcitabine and docetaxel combination has been shown to be synergistic . This study is conducted to verify the clinical efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and docetaxel combination therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Methods: 27 metastatic breast cancer patients were treated with gemcitabine-docetaxel combination . Gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 IV infusion, on day 1 and 8, and docetaxel 70 mg/m2 on day 1 in 21 day cycles. 4–6 cycles of chemotherapy were repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate, and survival. Results: The median age was 50 years (range,32–77). Performans status (ECOG) was 0–1. Hormone receptor status: ER+/ER-; 11/16, PR+/PR-; 14/13. Menopausal status were: 11 premenopausal, 16 postmenopausal. Of the 27 evaluable patients, there were 11 (40.7%) partial responses and no complete response. Overall response rate was 40.7%. Median time to progression was 7 months, and median survival was 14 months. Toxicities included grade 3–4 neutropenia in 9 (30%), thrombocytopenia in 6 (22%), anemia in 3(9%). There were no treatment releated deaths Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel has shown favorable toxicity profile and promising activity in metastatic breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document