Localized Ewing Tumor of Bone: Final Results of the Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1818-1829 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Paulussen ◽  
S. Ahrens ◽  
J. Dunst ◽  
W. Winkelmann ◽  
G.U. Exner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Ewing's Sarcoma ◽  
Central Axis ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Histologic Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Ewing Tumor

PURPOSE: Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study (CESS) 86 aimed at improving event-free survival (EFS) in patients with high-risk localized Ewing tumor of bone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 301 patients recruited from January 1986 to July 1991 (60% male; median age 15 years). Tumors of volume >100 mL and/or at central-axis sites qualified patients for “high risk” (HR, n = 241), and small extremity lesions for “standard risk” (SR, n = 52). Standard-risk patients received 12 courses of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin alternating with actinomycin D (VACA); HR patients received ifosfamide instead of cyclophosphamide (VAIA). Tumor sites were pelvis (27%), other central axis (28%), femur (19%), or other extremity (26%). The initial tumor volume was <100 mL in 33% of cases and ≥100 mL in 67%. Local therapy was surgery (23%), surgery plus radiotherapy (49%), or radiotherapy alone (28%). Event-free survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses, comparisons were done by log-rank test, and risk factors were analyzed by Cox models. RESULTS: On May 1, 1999 (median time under study, 133 months), the 10-year EFS was 0.52. Event-free survival did not differ between SR-VACA (0.52) and HR-VAIA (0.51, P = .92). Tumor volume of >200 mL (EFS, 0.36 v 0.63 for smaller tumors; P = .0001) and poor histologic response (EFS, 0.38 v 0.64 for good responders; P = .0007) had negative impacts on EFS. In multivariate analyses, small tumor volumes of <200 mL, good histologic response, and VAIA chemotherapy augured for fair outcome. Six of 301 patients (2%) died under treatment, and four patients (1.3%) developed second malignancies. CONCLUSION: Fifty-two percent of CESS 86 patients survived after risk-adapted therapy. High-risk patients seem to have benefited from intensified treatment that incorporated ifosfamide.

scholarly journals Oral Metronomic Maintenance Therapy Can Improve Survival in High-Risk Neuroblastoma Patients Not Treated with ASCT or Anti-GD2 Antibodies

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3494
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Sun ◽  
Zijun Zhen ◽  
Ying Guo ◽  
Yuanhong Gao ◽  
Juan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Conventional Treatment ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Antibody Therapy ◽  
Aggressive Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Risk Patients

Despite aggressive treatment, the prognosis of high-risk NB patients is still poor. This retrospective study investigated the benefits of metronomic maintenance treatment (MT) in high-risk NB patients without ASCT or GD2 antibody therapy. Patients aged ≤ 21 years with newly diagnosed high-risk NB were included. Patients with complete/very good partial remission (CR/VGPR/PR) to conventional treatment received, or not, oral metronomic MT for 1 year. Two hundred and seventeen high-risk NB patients were enrolled. One hundred and eighty-five (85%) had a CR/VGPR/PR to conventional treatment, of the patients with stage 4, 106 receiving and 61 not receiving oral metronomic MT, and the 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 42.5 ± 5.1% and 29.6 ± 6%, respectively (p = 0.017), and overall survival (OS) rate was 71.1 ± 4.7% and 59.4 ± 6.4%, respectively (p = 0.022). A total of 117 high-risk patients with oral metronomic MT had EFS rate of 42.7 ± 4.8%. The toxicity of MT was mild. For high-risk NB patients without ASCT or anti-GD2 antibody therapy, stage 4, MYCN amplication and patients with stage 4 not receiving oral metronomic MT after CR/VGPR/PR were independent adverse prognostic factors. Oral metronomic MT can improve survival in high-risk NB patients in CR/VGPR/PR without ASCT or anti-GD2 antibodies therapy.

scholarly journals Randomized trial comparing standard vs sequential high-dose chemotherapy for inducing early CR in adult AML

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 1103-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Bassan ◽  
Tamara Intermesoli ◽  
Arianna Masciulli ◽  
Chiara Pavoni ◽  
Cristina Boschini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Here we evaluated whether sequential high-dose chemotherapy (sHD) increased the early complete remission (CR) rate in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) compared with standard-intensity idarubicin-cytarabine-etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy. This study enrolled 574 patients (age, 16-73 years; median, 52 years) who were randomly assigned to ICE (n = 286 evaluable) or sHD (2 weekly 3-day blocks with cytarabine 2 g/m2 twice a day for 2 days plus idarubicin; n = 286 evaluable). Responsive patients were risk-stratified for a second randomization. Standard-risk patients received autograft or repetitive blood stem cell-supported high-dose courses. High-risk patients (and standard-risk patients not mobilizing stem cells) underwent allotransplantation. CR rates after 2 induction courses were comparable between ICE (80.8%) and sHD (83.6%; P = .38). sHD yielded a higher single-induction CR rate (69.2% vs 81.5%; P = .0007) with lower resistance risk (P &lt; .0001), comparable mortality (P = .39), and improved 5-year overall survival (39% vs 49%; P = .045) and relapse-free survival (36% vs 48%; P = .028), despite greater hematotoxicity delaying or reducing consolidation blocks. sHD improved the early CR rate in high-risk AML (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.74; P = .0008) and in patients aged 60 years and less with de novo AML (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.78; P = .003), and also improved overall/relapse-free survival in the latter group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.94; P = .01), in standard-risk AML, and postallograft (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.96; P = .03). sHD was feasible, effectively achieved rapid CR, and improved outcomes in AML subsets. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00495287.

scholarly journals CD2 antigen expression on leukemic cells as a predictor of event-free survival after chemotherapy for T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Cancer Group study

Blood ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 88 (11) ◽  
pp. 4288-4295 ◽  
Author(s):  
FM Uckun ◽  
PG Steinherz ◽  
H Sather ◽  
M Trigg ◽  
D Arthur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Antigen Expression ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract We examined the prognostic impact of CD2 antigen expression for 651 patients with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), who were enrolled in front-line Childrens Cancer Group treatment studies between 1983 and 1994. There was a statistically significant correlation between the CD2 antigen positive leukemic cell content of bone marrow and probability of remaining in bone marrow remission, as well as overall event-free survival (EFS) (P = .0003 and P = .002, log-rank tests for linear trend). When compared with patients with the highest CD2 expression level (> 75% positivity), the life table relative event rate (RER) was 1.22 for patients with intermediate range CD2 expression level (30% to 75% positivity) and 1.81 for “CD2-negative” patients (< 30% positivity). At 6 years postdiagnosis, the EFS estimates for the three CD2 expression groups (low positivity to high positivity) were 52.8%, 65.5%, and 71.9%, respectively. CD2 expression remained a significant predictor of EFS after adjustment for the effects of other covariates by multivariate regression, with a RER of 1.47 for CD2- negative patients (P = .04). Analysis of T-lineage ALL patients shows a significant separation in EFS after adjustment for the National Cancer Institute (NCI) age and white blood cell (WBC) criteria for standard and high-risk ALL (P = .002, RER = 1.67). The determination of CD2 expression on leukemic cells helped identify patients with the better and poorer prognoses in both of these risk group subsets. For standard risk T-lineage ALL, CD2-negative patients had a worse outcome (P = .0007, RER = 2.92) with an estimated 5-year EFS of 55.9% as compared with 78.3% for the CD2-positive patients. Thus, CD2 negativity in standard risk T-lineage ALL identified a group of patients who had a worse outcome than high-risk T-lineage ALL patients who were CD2 positive. The percentage of CD2 antigen positive leukemic cells from T- lineage ALL patients is a powerful predictor of EFS after chemotherapy. This prognostic relationship is the first instance in which a biological marker in T-lineage ALL has been unequivocally linked to treatment outcome.

Early Versus Deferred Treatment With Combined Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR) Improves Event-Free Survival In Patients With High-Risk Binet Stage A Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia – First Results Of a Randomized German-French Cooperative Phase III Trial

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 524-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen D Schweighofer ◽  
Florence Cymbalista ◽  
Carolin Müller ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Raphael Porcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Binet Stage

Abstract Introduction Patients with asymptomatic early Rai or Binet stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) do not benefit from mono-chemotherapy. Therefore, clinical observation without treatment (watch&wait; W&W) has been the gold standard for the management of these patients. Chemoimmunotherapy with FCR improves the outcome of patients with advanced CLL, but its efficacy in early stage disease has not been investigated. Several clinical and biological variables identify those patients who have a high risk of an aggressive disease course and who might benefit from early interventions. Consequently, this trial was conducted to test the value of FCR treatment in patients with early stage, high-risk CLL. Methods This report represents the endpoint and safety analysis of a randomized German-French cooperative phase III trial comparing the efficacy of early versus deferred FCR therapy in treatment-naïve Binet stage A CLL patients with a high risk of disease progression. Risk assessment was performed using 4 prognostic markers: Lymphocyte doubling time <12 months, serum thymidine kinase >10 U/L, an unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IGHV) status, and presence of unfavorable cytogenetics (del11q, del17p, trisomy 12) by fluorescence-in-situ hybridization. Presence of at least 2 versus less than 2 of these factors defined “high-risk” versus “low-risk” CLL. High-risk CLL patients were further randomized to receive either 6 cycles FCR (HR-FCR) or to be followed by a W&W strategy (HR-W&W). Patients with low-risk CLL were observed only (LR-W&W). Results Between 2005 and 2010, a total of 824 patients was enrolled, 423 patients in 69 centers of the German CLL Study Group and 401 patients in 25 centers of the French Cooperative Group on CLL. The diagnosis of CLL needed to be established no longer than 12 months prior to enrollment and patients were required to present with previously untreated stage Binet A CLL at the time of inclusion. Overall, 800 patients (97.1%) were stratified, 201 of them categorized as high-risk CLL (25.1%). There was no significant difference between high-risk patients from the two study groups regarding common baseline characteristics (e.g., age, sex, comorbidity, immunophenotype) and the distribution of risk factors used for stratification. 100 out of 201 high-risk patients were randomized to receive FCR therapy (HR-FCR), while 101 patients were allocated to the HR-W&W arm. 18 out of 100 patients (18%) withdrew consent for FCR therapy before treatment was started. 71 (86.6%) of 82 treated patients completed ≥4 cycles. The most common of 228 CTC grade III/IV adverse events reported within 12 months after treatment initiation were hematotoxicity (73.2% of patients) and infections (19.5% of patients). Three patients (3.7%) developed fatal CTC grade V infections (2 septic bacteremias, 1 of them with pulmonary aspergillosis; 1 encephalitis). Out of 79 patients available for response assessment until month 12 after treatment start, 76 showed a complete or partial remission (ORR 96.2%), 2 patients had stable disease (2.5%) and 1 patient had progressed (1.3%). After a median follow up of 46 months (range 0-88 months), HR-FCR patients demonstrated a significantly improved event-free survival (EFS) compared to HR-W&W patients (median EFS not reached versus 24.5 months, respectively, P<0.0001, Fig. 1). Overall survival was not significantly different between HR-FCR and HR-W&W with 181 high-risk patients (90%) being alive at last follow up. Both, HR-FCR and HR-W&W patients exhibited a significant shorter event-free and overall survival than LR-W&W patients, demonstrating an efficient prognostic segregation of patients by the risk assessment used for this trial (analysis based on the German LR-W&W cohort only, complete German-French LR-W&W data will be presented at the meeting). Conclusion This is the first randomized phase III trial investigating the efficacy of FCR chemoimmunotherapy in early stage CLL. So far, the study has revealed two major results: 1. A combination of clinical and biological factors can be used to identify early stage CLL patients who experience a rapid disease progression with unfavorable outcome, 2. FCR chemoimmunotherapy substantially improves event-free survival in early stage high-risk CLL. Disclosures: Langerbeins: Roche: travel grants Other. Cazin:roche: meeting invitation Other, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: meeting invitation, meeting invitation Other, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fischer:Mundipharma: Travel grants, Travel grants Other; Roche: Travel grants Other. Stilgenbauer:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel grants Other; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Leblond:Roche : Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hallek:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Results of the EICESS-92 Study: Two Randomized Trials of Ewing's Sarcoma Treatment—Cyclophosphamide Compared With Ifosfamide in Standard-Risk Patients and Assessment of Benefit of Etoposide Added to Standard Treatment in High-Risk Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (27) ◽  
pp. 4385-4393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Paulussen ◽  
Alan W. Craft ◽  
Ian Lewis ◽  
Allan Hackshaw ◽  
Carolyn Douglas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Ewing’S Sarcoma ◽  
Ewing's Sarcoma ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
First Recurrence ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Standard Risk

Purpose The European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study investigated whether cyclophosphamide has a similar efficacy as ifosfamide in standard-risk (SR) patients and whether the addition of etoposide improves survival in high-risk (HR) patients. Patients and Methods SR patients (localized tumors, volume <100 mL) were randomly assigned to receive four courses of vincristine, dactinomycin, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin (VAIA) induction therapy followed by 10 courses of either VAIA or vincristine, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (VACA; cyclophosphamide replacing ifosfamide). HR patients (volume ≥100 mL or metastases) were randomly assigned to receive 14 courses of either VAIA or VAIA plus etoposide (EVAIA). Outcome measures were event-free survival (EFS; defined as the time to first recurrence, progression, second malignancy, or death) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 647 patients were randomly assigned: 79 SR patients were assigned to VAIA, 76 SR patients were assigned to VACA, 240 HR were assigned to VAIA, and 252 HR patients were assigned to EVAIA. The median follow-up was 8.5 years. In the SR group, the hazard ratios (VACA v VAIA) for EFS and OS were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.55 to 1.53) and 1.08 (95% CI, 0.58 to 2.03), respectively. There was a higher incidence of hematologic toxicities in the VACA arm. In the HR group, the EFS and OS hazard ratios (EVAIA v VAIA) indicated a 17% reduction in the risk of an event (95% CI, −35% to 5%; P = .12) and 15% reduction in dying (95% CI, −34% to 10%), respectively. The effect seemed greater among patients without metastases (hazard ratio = 0.79; P = .16) than among those with metastases (hazard ratio = 0.96; P = .84). Conclusion Cyclophosphamide seemed to have a similar effect on EFS and OS as ifosfamide in SR patients but was associated with increased toxicity. In HR patients, the addition of etoposide seemed to be beneficial.

Clinical course long after atrial switch: a novel risk score for serious clinical events

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Woudstra ◽  
T.E Zandstra ◽  
R.F Vogel ◽  
A.P.J Van Dijk ◽  
H.W Vliegen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Events ◽  
Atrial Switch ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background Patients after atrial switch surgery for transposition of the great arteries (TGA-AtrSO) experience serious clinical events during adulthood, mainly heart failure and arrhythmias, but data on the emerging risks remain scarce. Purpose To assess the risk for events during the clinical course in adulthood of TGA-AtrSO patients and provide a novel risk score for event-free survival. Methods We reviewed medical records of TGA-AtrSO patients from five hospitals. Endpoints were all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF), defined as HF hospitalizations, heart transplantation, ventricular assist device implantation, or HF-related death, and symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Predictors for event-free survival were examined to construct a prediction model using bootstrapping techniques. Results We followed 169 TGA-AtrSO patients (60% Mustard, age 28 [IQR 24–36] years) for 13 [IQR 9–16] years, during which 17 (10%) died, 34 (20%) had HF events, and 15 (9%) had VA events. Five-year risk of mortality, first HF event, and first VA increased from 1% each at age 25, to 7% (95% CI 4–10%), 17% (95% CI 10–25%), and 4% (95% CI 2–8%), respectively, at age 50. A prediction model combining age &gt;30, prior VA, age &gt;1 year at repair surgery, QRS duration &gt;120ms, ≥mild LV dysfunction, and severe tricuspid regurgitation discriminated well between patients at low (&lt;5%), medium (5–20%) and high (&gt;20%) 5-year risk (optimism corrected C-statistic=0.84). Observed 5- and 10-year survival in low-risk patients were 100% and 99%, compared to only 45% and 19% in high-risk patients. Conclusion The clinical course of atrial switch patients increasingly consists of serious clinical events, especially heart failure. A novel risk score stratifying patients as low, medium, and high risk for event-free survival is presented, providing information on absolute individual risks which may support decisions for pharmacological and interventional management. Figure 1. Observed event-free survival of patients with predicted low risk (&lt;5% in 5 years), medium risk (5–20% in 5 years) and high risk (&gt;20% in 5 years). Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Dutch Heart Foundation; Amsterdam University Fund

scholarly journals Dasatinib Plus Intensive Chemotherapy in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of Children’s Oncology Group Trial AALL0622

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (22) ◽  
pp. 2306-2314 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Slayton ◽  
Kirk R. Schultz ◽  
John A. Kairalla ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Xinlei Mi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Cranial Irradiation ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Purpose Addition of imatinib to intensive chemotherapy improved survival for children and young adults with Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Compared with imatinib, dasatinib has increased potency, CNS penetration, and activity against imatinib-resistant clones. Patients and Methods Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trial AALL0622 (Bristol Myers Squibb trial CA180-204) tested safety and feasibility of adding dasatinib to intensive chemotherapy starting at induction day 15 in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia age 1 to 30 years. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) was recommended for patients at high risk based on slow response and for those with a matched family donor regardless of response after at least 11 weeks of therapy. Patients at standard risk based on rapid response received chemotherapy plus dasatinib for an additional 120 weeks. Patients with overt CNS leukemia received cranial irradiation. Results Sixty eligible patients were enrolled. Five-year overall (OS) and event-free survival rates (± standard deviations [SD]) were 86% ± 5% and 60% ± 7% overall, 87% ± 5% and 61% ± 7% for standard-risk patients (n = 48; 19% underwent HSCT), and 89% ± 13% and 67% ± 19% for high-risk patients (n = 9; 89% underwent HSCT), respectively. Five-year cumulative incidence (± SD) of CNS relapse was 15% ± 6%. Outcomes (± SDs) were similar to those in COG AALL0031, which used the same chemotherapy with continuous imatinib: 5-year OS of 81% ± 6% versus 86% ± 5% ( P = .63) and 5-year disease-free survival of 68% ± 7% versus 60% ± 7% ( P = 0.31) for AALL0031 versus AALL0622, respectively. IKZF1 deletions, present in 56% of tested patients, were associated with significantly inferior OS and event-free survival overall and in standard-risk patients. Conclusion Dasatinib was well tolerated with chemotherapy and provided outcomes similar to those with imatinib in COG AALL0031, where all patients received cranial irradiation. Our results support limiting HSCT to slow responders and suggest a potential role for transplantation in rapid responders with IKZF1 deletions.

Carfilzomib-based induction/consolidation with or without autologous transplant (ASCT) followed by lenalidomide (R) or carfilzomib-lenalidomide (KR) maintenance: Efficacy in high-risk patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8002-8002
Author(s):  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Roberto Mina ◽  
Delia Rota-Scalabrini ◽  
Monica Galli ◽  
Angelo Belotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medical Need ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Clinical Trial Information ◽  
1Q Gain

8002 Background: Cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) are one of the most powerful prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM). In the FORTE study, carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone induction/consolidation with ASCT (KRd_ASCT) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs KRd without ASCT (KRd12, HR 0.64) or carfilzomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (KCd) plus ASCT (KCd_ASCT, HR 0.53). KR maintenance significantly improved PFS vs R (HR 0.63). Methods: MM patients (pts) were randomized to KRd_ASCT vs KCd_ASCT vs KRd12 and, thereafter, to KR vs R maintenance. Subgroup analyses according to FISH evaluated the impact of each single high-risk (HiR) CA [del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), del1p and 1q gain (3 copies) or amp1q (≥4 copies)] and that of combined CA, defining HiR by the presence of ≥1 HiR CA and double-hit (DH) by the presence of ≥2 HiR CA. Pts negative for all the HiR CA were considered at standard risk (SR). The primary objective was the impact of treatment on PFS according to pt risk. Results: 396 out of 474 enrolled pts were included in the analysis with complete FISH data: 243 HiR, 105 DH and 153 SR. Among HiR pts, 60 had del17p, 65 t(4;14), 20 t(14;16), 44 del1p, 126 1q gain and 49 amp1q. SR pts benefited from intensification with KRd_ASCT vs KRd12 (HR 0.47, p = 0.05) and KCd_ASCT (HR 0.38, p = 0.01), with a 4-year PFS of 80%, 67% and 57%, respectively. In HiR pts, KRd_ASCT improved PFS vs KRd12 (HR 0.6, p = 0.04) and KCd_ASCT (HR 0.57, p = 0.01), with a 4-year PFS of 62%, 45% and 45%, respectively. The advantage with KRd_ASCT vs KRd12 (HR 0.53, p = 0.07) and KCd_ASCT (HR 0.49; p = 0.03) was also observed in DH pts (4-year PFS 55%, 31% and 33%, respectively). Analyses by single CA were limited by the small number of pts in each subgroup, but a trend towards a PFS benefit from KRd_ASCT vs KRd12 was seen in pts with del17p (HR 0.61, p = 0.3), t(4;14) (HR 0.59, p = 0.2) and 1q gain (HR 0.45, p = 0.02). In pts with del1p, KRd_ASCT (HR 0.24, p = 0.06) and KRd12 (HR 0.33, p = 0.09) showed superiority over KCd_ASCT, while amp1q pts had the worst outcome regardless of treatment (KRd_ASCT vs KCd_ASCT, HR 1.16, p = 0.73; KRd12 vs KCd_ASCT, HR 1.34, p = 0.45). KR improved PFS vs R in SR (3-year PFS 90% vs 73%, HR 0.42, p = 0.06), HiR (3-year PFS 69% vs 56%, HR 0.6, p = 0.04) and DH pts (3-year PFS 67% vs 42%, HR 0.53, p = 0.1). Despite the small subgroups, a beneficial trend with KR vs R was observed in pts with del17p (HR 0.59, p = 0.37), t(4;14) (HR 0.59, p = 0.3), 1q gain (HR 0.54, p = 0.07) and del1p (HR 0.23, p = 0.08), while amp1q pts showed the worst outcome and no benefit from KR vs R (HR 0.83, p = 0.7). Conclusions: KRd_ASCT and KR maintenance are highly effective in SR and also in HiR and DH pts, with impressive 4-year PFS from diagnosis (KRd_ASCT: HiR 62%, DH 55%) and 3-year PFS from maintenance (KR: HiR 69%, DH 67%), thus supporting their use in HiR pts, who represent an unmet medical need. Clinical trial information: NCT02203643.

Delayed Intensification (DI) Enhances Event-Free Survival (EFS) of Children with B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Who Received Intensification Therapy with Six Courses of Intravenous Methotrexate (MTX): POG 9904/9905: A Childrens Oncology Group Study (COG).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 583-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Winick ◽  
Paul L. Martin ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Jonathan Shuster ◽  
Michael J. Borowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
P Value ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Logrank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Leucovorin Rescue ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Std Risk ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Post-induction (ind) intensification with non-anti-metabolite based blocks of therapy, improved EFS on BFM 76/79, CCG 105 and UKALL X. The DI phase of reinduction-reconsolidation (BFM protocol II) was a major component of these strategies. An anti-metabolite based (MTX/mercaptopurine [MP]) intensification also improved EFS (POG 9005/9006). COG 9904 and 9905 addressed whether addition of DI improved EFS for a subset of lower, standard (std) and a subset of NCI high risk (HR) pts who all received 6 courses (cs) of IV MTX (1 gm/m2/24 hrs vs 2 gm/m2/4 hrs) plus oral MP as intensification. The results of the MTX randomization (4 vs 24 hrs) are still blinded. Ind was a dexamethasone (dex)-based 3-drug (NCI std risk) or prednisone-based 4-drug (NCI HR or std with extramedullary disease) regimen. The 3-drug ind was modified because of excessive mortality with the intrathecal (IT) MTX on day 1 changed to IT Ara-C and 6 doses of native asparaginase (asp) (10,000 IU/m2) replaced with 1 dose of PEG asp. 1124 pts were treated pre-; 477 post-amendment. Post-ind, NCI std risk pts with trisomies of chromosomes 4 and 10 or a TELAML1 (TEL) translocation were classified as lower risk and enrolled on 9904. Only the TEL pts participated in the DI randomization. Std risk pts without and HR pts with favorable blast cytogenetics, or pts who did not meet refined NCI high risk age and WBC criteria were eligible for 9905. Pts with CNS3 disease, t(9;22), t(4;11), or hypodiploidy were excluded from both studies. Consolidation on 9904/9905 included 6 cs of IV MTX with leucovorin rescue for all pts. DI began at wk 16 after the 3rd course of IV MTX and was delivered over 8 wks: 1.5 mg/m2 vincristine and 30 mg/m2 daunomycin (wks 1, 2 and 3), daily dex (6 mg/m2 × 21 days), 2500 IU/m2 PEG asp (wk 1), age adjusted IT MTX (wks 1, 5, 6), 75 mg/m2 Ara-C (IV /SC) daily × 4 days (wks 5 and 6), 1 gm/m2 cyclophosphamide (wk 5) and 60 mg/m2 6-thioguanine daily × 14 doses (wks 6–7). A total of 1403 patients were randomized to +/− DI between April 7, 2000 and April 15, 2005. There were only 2 remission deaths; 1 each in +/− DI arms. There was a statistically significant improvement in EFS for all pts receiving the DI, with no statistically significant interaction (size of treatment differences in 4 yr EFS) between any pair of subsets. The difference, though not significant (study not powered to look at subsets), for the 9905 NCI HR pts with and without favorable cytogenetics, was in the same direction as the overall results, but still suboptimal with EFS below 80%. This may reflect differences between the dex and anthracycline used during the DI phase in this study versus BFM 76/69 and CCG 105 and/or the need for an intervention other than this DI in NCI HR patients. No DI DI Cohort 4 yr EFS N 4 yr EFS N 1 sided p-value* *p-values are by the logrank test Overall (9904/9905 NCI Std & High Risk) 81.6±2.0% 710 86.5±1.7% 693 0.0049 9904/9905 NCI Standard Risk 84.5±2.1% 517 90.3±1.7% 512 0.0012 9904 NCI Std Risk with TELAML1 91.1±2.6% 217 93.6±2.2% 216 0.0900 9905 NCI Std Risk 79.8±3.2% 300 87.9±2.5% 296 0.0027 9905 NCI HR 74.3±4.3% 93 76.2±4.5% 181 0.3839

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document