Correlation Between O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase and Survival in Inoperable Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Temozolomide

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1470-1475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier L. Chinot ◽  
Maryline Barrié ◽  
Stephane Fuentes ◽  
Nathalie Eudes ◽  
Sophie Lancelot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mgmt Expression ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense

Purpose This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 7-day on/7-day off regimen of temozolomide before radiotherapy (RT) in patients with inoperable newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients and Methods Patients received temozolomide (150 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 7 and days 15 to 21 every 28 days; 7 days on/7 days off) for up to four cycles before conventional RT (2-Gy fractions to a total of 60 Gy) and for four cycles thereafter or until disease progression. The primary end point was tumor response. Tumor tissue from 25 patients was analyzed for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression. Results Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 60 years were treated, and 28 were assessable for response. Seven (24%) of 29 patients had a partial response, nine patients (31%) had stable disease, and 12 patients (41%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 3.8 months, and median overall survival (OS) time was 6.1 months. Patients with low MGMT expression, compared with patients with high MGMT expression, had a significantly higher response rate (55% v 7%, respectively; P = .004) and improved PFS (median, 5.5 v 1.9 months, respectively; P = .009) and OS (median, 16 v 5 months, respectively; P = .003). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (20%) and neutropenia (17%). Conclusion This dose-dense temozolomide regimen resulted in modest antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile in the neoadjuvant setting, and expression of MGMT correlated with response to temozolomide. However, this treatment approach seems to be inferior to standard concomitant RT plus temozolomide.

scholarly journals Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective cohort study

CNS Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. CNS76
Author(s):  
Srinivas Annavarapu ◽  
Anagha Gogate ◽  
Trang Pham ◽  
Kalatu Davies ◽  
Prianka Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Aim: Investigate real-world outcomes and healthcare utilization of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) related to O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter testing and methylation. Patients & methods: US Oncology Network data were analyzed for patients receiving first-line (1L) treatment for GBM. Results: Most patients received 1L radiation with temozolomide. Unadjusted median overall survival (OS) was higher in tested versus untested (median:18.1 vs 11.8 months) and in methylated versus unmethylated (median: 25.5 vs 12.4 months). Untested status, unmethylated MGMT and older age were associated with reduced OS and longer 1L treatment with increased OS. Similar findings were observed for progression-free survival. Utilization was similar between cohorts. Conclusion: In community oncology practices, MGMT methylation and testing were predictive of better survival in GBM.

A randomized phase II trial of concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) followed by dose dense compared to metronomic TMZ and maintenance cis-retinoic acid for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2031-2031 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sul ◽  
K. S. Panageas ◽  
A. B. Lassman ◽  
A. Hormigo ◽  
C. Nolan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Angiogenic Therapy ◽  
Progression Of Disease ◽  
Dose Dense

2031 Background: Metronomic and dose dense scheduling are alternatives to conventional TMZ regimens to overcome drug resistance in part by depleting O-6 methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Furthermore, metronomic TMZ may inhibit endothelial recovery and act as an anti-angiogenic therapy; dose dense TMZ increases the intensity of drug delivery. Objective: To determine the overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated with concurrent TMZ and RT followed by dose dense or metronomic TMZ and maintenance cis-retinoic acid. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed GBM underwent standard RT with TMZ. Upon completion of this treatment, patients were randomized to receive dose-dense TMZ (150mg/m2, days 1–7 and 15–21 of a 28 day cycle) or metronomic TMZ (50mg/m2 daily in 28 day cycles), for 6 cycles. Maintenance cis-retinoic acid was prescribed following the 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ. OS and PFS were calculated from date of diagnosis. Prospective correlative tissue analysis of MGMT status is planned. A Simon minimax 2-stage design was used for each cohort. If either group has 70% survival probability at 1 year, further evaluation in a phase III trial will be recommended. Results: 51 patients were randomized: 24 to metronomic, and 27 to dose dense. Median age is 57, and median KPS 90. 26 patients have progression of disease (POD), with a median follow up of 5 months. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 7 patients (14%), 3 in the metronomic and 4 in the dose dense arm. Conclusions: Our patient population is comparable to that of other upfront GBM treatment trials. Metronomic and dose dense TMZ appear to be well tolerated with equivalent toxicities. Early analysis suggests that patients on the dose dense regimen may have better PFS than those on the metronomic arm. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Randomized Phase II Trial of Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Either Dose-Dense or Metronomic Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (23) ◽  
pp. 3861-3867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Clarke ◽  
Fabio M. Iwamoto ◽  
Joohee Sul ◽  
Katherine Panageas ◽  
Andrew B. Lassman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Dose Dense

Purpose Alternative dosing schedules of temozolomide may improve survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) by increasing the therapeutic index, overcoming common mechanisms of temozolomide resistance, or both. The goal of this randomized phase II study was to evaluate two different temozolomide regimens in the adjuvant treatment of newly diagnosed GBM. Patients and Methods Adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM were randomly assigned to receive standard radiotherapy with concurrent daily temozolomide followed by six adjuvant cycles of either dose-dense (150 mg/m2 days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21) or metronomic (50 mg/m2 continuous daily) temozolomide. Maintenance doses of 13-cis-retinoic acid were then administered until tumor progression. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) at 1 year. Tumor tissue was assayed to determine O6-methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status. Results Eighty-five eligible patients were enrolled; 42 were randomly assigned to dose-dense and 43 to metronomic temozolomide. The 1-year survival rate was 80% for the dose-dense arm and 69% for the metronomic arm; median OS was 17.1 months (95% CI, 14.0 to 28.1 months) and 15.1 months (95% CI, 12.3 to 18.9 months), respectively. The most common toxicities were myelosuppression (leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) and elevated liver enzymes. Pseudoprogression was observed in 37% of assessable patients and may have had an impact on estimates of progression-free survival (6.6 months in the dose-dense arm and 5.0 months in the metronomic arm). Conclusion Both dose-dense and metronomic temozolomide regimens were well tolerated with modest toxicity. The dose-dense regimen appears promising, with 1-year survival of 80%.

scholarly journals A phase I/II trial of 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery with 5-mm margins with concurrent temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: primary outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1182-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Azoulay ◽  
Steven D Chang ◽  
Iris C Gibbs ◽  
Steven L Hancock ◽  
Erqi L Pollom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract Background We sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with 5-mm margins delivered with concurrent temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). Methods We enrolled adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma to 5 days of SRS in a 3 + 3 design on 4 escalating dose levels: 25, 30, 35, and 40 Gy. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grades 3–5 acute or late CNS toxicity, including adverse radiation effect (ARE), the imaging correlate of radiation necrosis. Results From 2010 to 2015, thirty patients were enrolled. The median age was 66 years (range, 51–86 y). The median target volume was 60 cm3 (range, 14.7–137.3 cm3). DLT occurred in 2 patients: one for posttreatment cerebral edema and progressive disease at 3 weeks (grade 4, dose 40 Gy); another patient died 1.5 weeks following SRS from postoperative complications (grade 5, dose 40 Gy). Late grades 1–2 ARE occurred in 8 patients at a median of 7.6 months (range 3.2–12.6 mo). No grades 3–5 ARE occurred. With a median follow-up of 13.8 months (range 1.7–64.4 mo), the median survival times were: progression-free survival, 8.2 months (95% CI: 4.6–10.5); overall survival, 14.8 months (95% CI: 10.9–19.9); O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase hypermethylated, 19.9 months (95% CI: 10.5–33.5) versus 11.3 months (95% CI: 8.9–17.6) for no/unknown hypermethylation (P = 0.03), and 27.2 months (95% CI: 11.2–48.3) if late ARE occurred versus 11.7 months (95% CI: 8.9–17.6) for no ARE (P = 0.08). Conclusions The per-protocol MTD of 5-fraction SRS with 5-mm margins with concurrent temozolomide was 40 Gy in 5 fractions. ARE was limited to grades 1–2 and did not statistically impact survival.

scholarly journals When Temozolomide Alone Fails: Adding Procarbazine in Salvage Therapy of Glioma

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fleur Huang ◽  
Petr Kavan ◽  
Marie-Christine Guiot ◽  
Yelena Markovic ◽  
David Roberge
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Disease Progression

Background:Since temozolomide (TMZ) entry into routine practice in the first-line management of glial tumors, post-TMZ recurrences present a growing challenge. Without standard chemotherapy for TMZ failure, care in such palliative settings requires consideration not only of efficacy but of toxicity and convenience.Methods:At our institution, a combination regimen has been used: oral alkylating agents procarbazine (PCB) (100-150 mg/m2/day) and TMZ (150-200 mg/m2/day) administered on days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle. This treatment has been initiated upon radiological and/or clinical disease progression, and continued until evidence of further progression or toxicity. We retrospectively reviewed our experence with this regimen.Results:Since November 2004, 17 patients (median age 53) were treated for histologically confirmed glioma (glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), N=12; Grade 3 glioma, N=3; Grade 2 glioma, N=2) after a median of 2 recurrences. TMZ was previously given either as adjuvant therapy (post-chemoradiotherapy maintenance in 8 of 13 cases) or as salvage monotherapy (4 cases). Of 16 evaluable cases, 14 (13 high grade tumors) showed O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Two patients achieved partial response and one had complete response by RECIST criteria. Disease progressed after a median of 4 cycles (range 1 to 11+), with an actuarial progression-free survival of 42% after 6 cycles. Grade 3/4 toxicity was rare, and no dose reductions were needed. One patient discontinued treatment due to procarbazine hypersensitivity.Conclusion:Combination PCB-TMZ is well-tolerated, with modest activity in TMZ-exposed glioma.

scholarly journals Methylation of MGMT promoter does not predict response to temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma in Donostia Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larraitz Egaña ◽  
Jaione Auzmendi-Iriarte ◽  
Joaquin Andermatten ◽  
Jorge Villanua ◽  
Irune Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status has been considered a prognostic factor in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with glioblastoma in Donostia Hospital. Surprisingly, methylation of MGMT promoter did not predict response to temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma in Donostia Hospital. Specifically, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly by MGMT methylation status in our cohort. In contrast, both were longer in patients who received treatment, received more TMZ cycles, had a better general status and perform at least a partial resection. No association was detected between methylation of MGMT promoter and molecular markers such as ATRX, IDH, p53 and Ki67. These results indicate that MGMT methylation did not influence in patient survival in our cohort.

scholarly journals Patients Affected by Unmethylated O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Glioblastoma Undergoing Radiochemotherapy May Benefit from Moderately Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Tini ◽  
Valerio Nardone ◽  
Pierpaolo Pastina ◽  
Giuseppe Battaglia ◽  
Clelia Miracco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Therapeutic Results ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose. To compare the therapeutic results of two radiotherapy (RT) dose schedules in combined temozolomide- (TMZ-) RT treatment in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB), according to the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status.Material and Method. Patients received either standard (60 Gy) or moderately escalated dose (70 Gy) radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ between June 2006 and October 2013. We retrospectively evaluated the therapeutic effectiveness of RT schedules in terms of Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Disease Free Survival (PDFS) analyzing the MGMT methylation status.Results. One hundred and seventeen patients were selected for the present analysis. Seventy-two out of the selected cases received the standard RT-TMZ course (SDRT-TMZ) whereas the remaining 45 underwent the escalated schedule (HDRT-TMZ). The analysis according to the MGMT promoter methylation status showed that, in unmethylated-MGMT GB patients, HDRT-TMZ and SDRT-TMZ groups had different median OS (p=0,01) and PDFS (p=0,007), that is, 8 months and 5 months for the SDRT-TMZ group and 14 months and 9 months for the HDRT-TMZ group, respectively. No difference in survival outcomes was found in methylated MGMT patients according to the two RT schedules (p=0,12).Conclusions. In our experience, unmethylated-MGMT GB patients benefited from a moderately escalated dose of RT plus TMZ.

Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis

Chemotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kotone Hayuka ◽  
Hiroyuki Okuyama ◽  
Akitsu Murakami ◽  
Yoshihiro Okita ◽  
Takamasa Nishiuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Lonsurf (trifluridine/tipiracil): Assessing the impact of dose related toxicities and progression free survival in (refractory) metastatic colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110179
Author(s):  
Olivia R Court
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Length Of Treatment ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

In the RECOURSE trial which lead to its accreditation, Lonsurf (trifluridine/tipiracil) was shown to extend progression free survival (PFS) by 1.8 months in metastatic colorectal cancer. This Trust audit aims to assess the average quantity of cycles of Lonsurf received by participants and the length of time it extends PFS. Similarly, to identify how many participants required a dose-reduction or experienced toxicities which necessitated supportive therapies. Quantitative data was collected retrospectively from all participants who had received ≥1 cycle of Lonsurf from The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre (CCC) from 2016 until June 2020. Participant electronic patient records were accessed to identify toxicity grading, length of treatment received, the date progression was identified, if dose reductions were applied and if supportive therapies were administered. Lonsurf extends PFS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer at CCC by 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.73–3.27) and average treatment length was 2.4 months. However, 78 participants (41.5%) received a dose reduction due to toxicities. A total of 955 toxicities were recorded by participants; the most commonly reported toxicities irrespective of grade were fatigue (33.8%), diarrhoea (13.8%) and nausea (12.3%). The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were constipation and infection. The most frequently utilised supportive therapies were loperamide (49.6%) and domperidone (49.1%). Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) was required by patients on 5 occasions (0.3%) in total. Lonsurf extends median PFS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by 3.0 months. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities which necessitated supportive therapies or a dose reduction were gastrointestinal and infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document