A prospective pharmacogenomic (PG), pharmacodynamic (PD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of determinants of erlotinib toxicity
3080 Background: A strong but unexplained association between skin toxicity (rash) and survival from erlotinib therapy has been noted for patients with several epithelial malignancies. The correlation between rash and clinical benefit appears to extend across classes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted agents. Several hypothetical explanations for this association have been suggested including polymorphisms of the EGFR locus as well as PD and PK variability. Methods: We conducted this 80-subject prospective study in patients with lung (N=43), head and neck (N=9), and ovarian cancer (N=28) given erlotinib 150 mg daily to evaluate several of these hypotheses. Patients underwent toxicity monitoring, response assessment, skin biopsies pretreatment and after 28 days for immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, as well as blood collection for PK analysis and evaluation of EGFR genetic polymorphisms reported to influence EGFR expression level. Results: 72/80 subjects are evaluable for toxicity. Response correlates with both worst grade diarrhea (p=0.003) and rash (p=0.044). Initial PK analysis suggests a positive association between d15 erlotinib trough level and both diarrhea (p=0.091) and rash (p=0.076). Controlling for d15 erlotinib level, EGFR intron 1 CA repeat length is also associated with rash (p=0.030). Polymorphisms in the EGFR promoter (216 G/T and 191 C/A) correlated with diarrhea (p=0.053 and 0.005 respectively) but not rash. IHC analyses including EGFR, p-EGFR, Akt, p-Akt, ERK, and p-ERK have been completed on 35 paired, pre-post treatment skin biopsies and demonstrate no strong correlations with toxicity. Conclusions: These data suggest that both interindividual PK variability and EGFR polymorphisms may contribute to erlotinib toxicity. Erlotinib effects on EGFR signaling in skin do not appear to correlate with toxicity. Samples obtained in this study are available for analysis of other candidate PG determinants of both toxicity and PK variability. [Table: see text]