Safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated results from a large observational registry in the US (BRiTE)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3536-3536 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hedrick ◽  
M. Kozloff ◽  
J. Hainsworth ◽  
S. Badarinath ◽  
A. Cohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
First Line ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Large Community ◽  
Grade 3

3536 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival when added to standard chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). BRiTE is a large, community-based observational registry of patients with mCRC receiving BV plus first-line chemotherapy. Safety and efficacy information in unselected patients with mCRC are collected. Chemotherapy regimen choice is at the physician’s discretion. Methods: To facilitate and evaluate enrollment of a typical community-based mCRC population, eligibility criteria were minimized. Cohort demographics were consistent with the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for mCRC. Patients are followed for up to 3 years, and safety data including targeted BV-associated serious adverse events (SAEs) are updated every 3 months (mo). Results are based on descriptive analyses and are not adjusted for propensity of treatment, baseline characteristics, and treatment effects. Results: 1968 patients were enrolled between Feb 2004 and Jun 2005. Median study follow-up was 10 mo by Nov 4, 2005. SAEs were reported in 12.0% of patients including gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) (1.7%), postoperative bleeding/wound healing complications (1.2%), arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) (2.1%), and grade 3–4 bleeding (1.9%). 3.2% of patients discontinued BV due to a BV-related toxicity, most commonly bleeding. For patients with the respective event(s), median time to first event was 2.1 mo for GIP, 3.5 mo for ATE and 4.0 mo for grade 3–4 bleeding. 8.9% of patients with no history of hypertension (HTN) developed HTN requiring medication and 6.2% of patients who had HTN requiring medication at baseline experienced worsening of their HTN while on study treatment. Conclusions: In this unselected population of patients with mCRC, the safety profile of BV plus various chemotherapy regimens appears consistent with that observed in the pivotal BV trial. Overall discontinuation of BV due to a BV-related toxicity was uncommon. In this large community-based observational registry, no new BV associated safety issues have been identified. [Table: see text]

Preliminary safety of bevacizumab with first-line Folfox, Capox, Folfiri and capecitabine for mCRC—First B.E.A.Trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3534-3534 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Berry ◽  
D. Cunningham ◽  
M. Michael ◽  
M. Dibartolomeo ◽  
F. Rivera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Large Phase ◽  
Arterial Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Grade 3

3534 Background: In a phase III pivotal trial in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), bevacizumab (BEV) increased overall survival by 30% when added to first-line IFL chemotherapy (CT). Safety data from controlled BEV trials have been described, and indicate that certain serious adverse events (SAE), primarily gastrointestinal (GI) perforations and arterial thromboembolic events (TE) occurred more often in pts who received CT with BEV than those who received CT alone. First BEAT was opened to evaluate safety events of BEV in a broader pt population using a variety of CT regimens. Methods: First BEAT started in June 2004 and aims to enrol up to 2000 mCRC pts in 41 countries. Eligible pts starting with first-line CT (physician’s choice) are treated until progression with BEV (5mg/kg q2w [5FU based CT] or 7.5mg/kg q3w [capecitabine based CT]). SAEs include deaths, new and prolonged hospitalizations, life-threatening as well as medically significant events and are reported within 24 hours. There BEV-relatedness is assessed by investigators. Results: By Dec 20, 2005, 1915 pts had been enrolled in 40 countries. 1603/1915 pts (male 58%; median age 59 years [29% were > 65 years]; PS 0–1 99%) had baseline data available for analyses. Median follow-up was 6.7 months (mean 7.3); 1509 pts had been followed-up for >60 days. The most common first-line CT regimens used with BEV were FOLFOX (28%), CAPOX (17%), FOLFIRI (25%) and capecitabine (8%). Among the 1603 pts that had started treatment with BEV, 638 SAEs were reported in 394 pts (25%). 60-day mortality was 2.4%. The most common SAE were diarrhoea 2.7% and pyrexia 2.2% and were usually not attributed as related to BEV. Related SAEs were reported in 132 (8%) pts. venous TE 1.7%, pulmonary embolism 1.1%, bleeding 1.0%, GI perforation 0.9%, arterial TE 0.8%, hypertension 0.5% wound healing complications 0.3% were usually classified as related SAEs. Conclusions: In this ongoing, large community-based study, the safety profile of BEV in first line mCRC pts receiving a variety of CT regimens, namely FOLFOX, CAPOX, FOLFIRI and capecitabine, appears consistent with that observed in large phase III randomised studies. Updated safety data, including grade 3/4 CTC toxicities, will be presented. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated results from a large observational registry in the US (BRiTE)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3537-3537 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kozloff ◽  
J. Hainsworth ◽  
S. Badarinath ◽  
A. Cohn ◽  
P. Flynn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
First Line ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Large Community ◽  
Primary Disease ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Site

3537 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) when added to standard chemotherapy (CT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). BRiTE is a large, community-based observational registry of patients with mCRC receiving BV plus first-line CT. Safety and efficacy information in unselected patients with mCRC are collected. Chemotherapy regimen choice is at the physician’s discretion. Methods: 1968 patients receiving BV plus first-line CT were enrolled at 248 sites in 49 states between Feb 2004 and Jun 2005. Patients are followed for up to 3 years, with data reporting every 3 months (mo) including disease status as assessed by investigator using his/her method of choice. Patients were grouped twice by CT. Cox regression models, adjusted and unadjusted for treatment assignment, were used to identify baseline characteristics (BC) and differential chemotherapy effects on PFS. Results: Cohort demographics were consistent with the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for mCRC. Median study follow-up was 10 months by Nov 4, 2005. CT regimens included FOLFOX (55.8%), FOLFIRI (14.1%), and IFL (9.7%). Based on observed progression events (n=800) or deaths (n=123), projected median PFS is 11.3 mo (95% CI: 10.4–11.7). Median PFS was comparable in patients treated with CT regimen based on irinotecan (11.3 mo), oxaliplatin (11.4 mo), or neither (10.2 mo) (CT Grouping 1); or 5FU infusion (11.5 mo), 5-FU bolus (9.7 mo), or capecitabine (11.6 mo) (CT Grouping 2). Significant BC in adjusted and unadjusted models are ECOG performance status (PS), primary disease site, and albumin, with no significant difference among CT regimens. Conclusions: This large, community-based registry included a patient population with demographics consistent with the SEER database for mCRC. Preliminary median PFS of 11.3 mo compares favorably to that reported in the pivotal trial. Median PFS appears to be comparable for all CTs when combined with BV. Higher baseline albumin, PS of 0, and primary disease site of rectum were associated with improved outcome. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Real-world comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591985036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Guido Giordano ◽  
George Kim ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

Background: No clinical trial has directly compared nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (nab-P/G) with FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer (mPC or aPC). We conducted a systematic review of real-world studies comparing these regimens in the first-line setting. Methods: Embase and MEDLINE databases through 22 January 2019, and Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium 2019 abstracts were searched for real-world, retrospective studies comparing first-line nab-P/G versus FOLFIRINOX in mPC or aPC that met specific parameters. Studies with radiotherapy were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Of 818 records initially identified, 35 were duplicates and 749 did not meet the eligibility criteria, mostly because they were either not comparative ( n = 356) or not first line ( n = 245). The remaining 34 studies (21 mPC; 13 aPC) assessed >6915 patients who received nab-P/G or FOLFIRINOX. In the studies identified, the median overall survival (OS) reached 14.4 and 15.9 months with nab-P/G and FOLFIRINOX, respectively, and median progression-free survival reached 8.5 and 11.7 months, respectively. Safety data were reported in 14 studies (2205 patients), including 8 single-institutional studies. In most single-institutional studies that reported safety data, rates were higher with FOLFIRINOX versus nab-P/G for grade 3/4 neutropenia (five of six studies) and febrile neutropenia (all three studies), while rates of grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy were higher with nab-P/G in four of seven studies. Conclusions: Although FOLFIRINOX was associated with slightly longer median OS in more studies, the differences, when available, were not statistically significant. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial is warranted. Toxicity profile differences represent key considerations for treatment decisions.

Phase III Multicenter Randomized Trial of Oxaliplatin Added to Chronomodulated Fluorouracil–Leucovorin as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Giacchetti ◽  
B. Perpoint ◽  
R. Zidani ◽  
N. Le Bail ◽  
R. Faggiuolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

PURPOSE: To study how adding oxaliplatin (l-OHP) to chronomodulated fluorouracil (5-FU)–leucovorin (LV) affected the objective response rate, as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients from 15 institutions in four countries were randomly assigned to receive a 5-day course of chronomodulated 5-FU and LV (700 and 300 mg/m2/d, respectively; peak delivery rate at 0400 hours) with or without l-OHP on the first day of each course (125 mg/m2, as a 6-hour infusion). Each course was repeated every 21 days. Response was assessed by extramural review of computed tomography scans. RESULTS: Grade 3 to 4 toxicity from 5-FU–LV occurred in ≤ 5% of the patients (≤ 1% of the courses). Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea occurred in 43% of the patients given l-OHP (10% of the courses), and less than 2% of the patients had severe hematotoxicity. Thirteen percent of the patients had moderate functional impairment from peripheral sensory neuropathy. Sixteen percent of the patients receiving 5-FU–LV had an objective response (95% confidence interval [CI], 9% to 24%), compared with 53% of those receiving additional l-OHP (95% CI, 42% to 63%) (P < .001). The median progression-free survival time was 6.1 months with 5-FU–LV (range, 4.1 to 7.4 months) and 8.7 months (7.4 to 9.2 months) with l-OHP and 5-FU–LV (P = .048). Median survival times were 19.9 and 19.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: By chronomodulating 5-FU–LV, we were able to add l-OHP without compromising dose-intensities. l-OHP significantly improved the antitumor efficacy of this regimen.

Pharmacogenetic Assessment of Toxicity and Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With LV5FU2, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI: FFCD 2000-05

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15) ◽  
pp. 2556-2564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie Boige ◽  
Jean Mendiboure ◽  
Jean-Pierre Pignon ◽  
Marie-Anne Loriot ◽  
Marine Castaing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cancérologie Digestive

Purpose The aim was to investigate whether germline polymorphisms within candidate genes known or suspected to be involved in fluorouracil (FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan pathways were associated with toxicity and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods Blood samples from 349 patients included in the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 2000-05 randomized trial, which compared FU plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) followed by FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) followed by FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; sequential arm) with FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI (combination arm) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, were collected. Twenty polymorphisms within the DPD, TS, MTHFR, ERCC1, ERCC2, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and UGT1A1 genes were genotyped. Results The ERCC2-K751QC allele was independently associated with an increased risk of FOLFOX-induced grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity (P = .01). In the sequential arm, TS-5′UTR3RG and GSTT1 alleles were independently associated with response to LV5FU2 (P = .009) and FOLFOX (P = .01), respectively. The effect of oxaliplatin on tumor response increased with the number of MTHFR-1298C alleles (test for trend, P = .008). The PFS benefit from first-line FOLFOX was restricted to patients with 2R/2R (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.68) or 2R/3R (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.82) TS-5′UTR genotypes, respectively. Conversely, patients with the TS-5′UTR 3R/3R genotype did not seem to benefit from the adjunction of oxaliplatin (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.40; trend between the three HRs, P = .006). Conclusion A pharmacogenetic approach may be a useful strategy for personalizing and optimizing chemotherapy in mCRC patients and deserves confirmation in additional prospective studies.

Risk factors for gastrointestinal perforations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving bevacizumab plus chemotherapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3535-3535 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sugrue ◽  
M. Kozloff ◽  
J. Hainsworth ◽  
S. Badarinath ◽  
A. Cohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Large Community ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Potential Risk Factors

3535 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival when added to standard chemotherapy in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). BRiTE is a large, community-based observational registry of pts with mCRC receiving BV plus first-line chemotherapy (CT). Incidence rate, temporal pattern, and potential risk factors associated with gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) were explored. Methods: Baseline patient characteristics (BC), including prospectively identified potential risk factors for GIP, were collected at study entry. Safety data were collected every 3 months (mo). Logistic regression models, adjusted and unadjusted for treatment assignment, were used to identify BC potentially associated with GIP. Results: 1968 pts were enrolled between Feb 2004 and Jun 2005. Median study follow-up was 10 mo as of Nov 4, 2005. GIPs were observed in 34 pts (1.7%). For pts with GIP, median time to first event was 2.1 mo; the majority of events were non-fatal and occurred within the first 3 mo after starting BV. BC including GI medical history (chronic aspirin or NSAID use, peptic ulcer disease, diverticulosis) were similar in pts with or without GIP and with earlier or later GIP onset (≤ or >3 mo from start of BV). Although adjusted models did not show any significant BC, GIP rates were numerically higher in pts with primary tumor intact (2.6%) vs. resected (1.6%). Furthermore, univariate analyses revealed a significant difference between intact (2.3%) and resected (0.8%) primary tumor for earlier GIP (≤3 mo from start of BV). The majority of pts with GIP had at least one of the following: acute diverticulitis, intra-abdominal abscess, gastrointestinal obstruction, tumor at GIP site, abdominal carcinomatosis, prior abdominal or pelvic radiation therapy. Conclusions: Preliminary analyses indicate the incidence of GIP in this large, community-based observational registry is similar to that previously reported in phase III mCRC trials with BV. No associations between specific BCs and an increased risk of GIP were identified. Patients with primary tumor intact were more likely to incur a GIP within the first 3 mo of starting BV and CT. [Table: see text]

Results of a phase II trial of cetuximab + XELIRI as first-line therapy of patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4094-4094
Author(s):  
T. H. Cartwright ◽  
P. Kuefler ◽  
A. Cohn ◽  
W. Hyman ◽  
M. Yoffe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Allergic Reaction ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Dose Reductions

4094 Background: We have previously shown that capecitabine/irinotecan (XELIRI) is effective and well-tolerated in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Cetuximab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that binds to the extracellular domain of EGFR, is active in mCRC alone or in combination with chemotherapy. This study was designed to evaluate if cetuximab (Erbitux®) added to XELIRI improves outcome in first-line treatment of mCRC. Methods: Subjects had histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma with T4 lesions that were unresectable after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and/or metastases. The study regimen was capecitabine 1700 mg/m2 (850 mg/m2 PO BID Days 1–14), irinotecan 200 mg/m2 IV Day 1 every 3 weeks, and weekly cetuximab (initial dose 400 mg/m2 IV over 120 minutes, subsequent doses 250 mg/m2 over 30 minutes). Results: Between February and October 2005, 70 subjects enrolled. Baseline characteristics: 43 males (61%), median age 61.5 years, and ECOG PS 0/1= 66%/34%; 94% of subjects had adenocarcinoma. Prior therapy; surgery (91%), chemotherapy (20%), or radiotherapy (7%). Responses (pts >2 cycles) were; CR (4%), PR (36%), SD (40%) and PD (20%); 15 patients failed treatment; (n=4 allergic reaction, n=2 MD request, n=2 withdrew consent, n=2 Grade 4 neutropenia, and n=5 other AEs). The overall response rate was 40% and the disease control rate was 80%. Median duration of response was 8.8 months (range, 2.6–15.1) and median time to response was 2.0 months (range, 1.2–8.3). 64% of patients remain alive; of the 25 deaths, 84% were due to PD. No death was drug related. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included: diarrhea (25%), neutropenia (18%), nausea/vomiting (12%), rash and dehydration (9%, each), HFS and fatigue (7%), and allergic reaction (6%). 54% of patients required dose reductions. To date, 64 patients (91%) have gone off study, primarily due to PD (39%) or AE (33%); 3 patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: The combination of cetuximab and XELIRI is feasible and tolerable in first line mCRC. Toxicities are expected and manageable with dose reductions/delay. Funded in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Safety and efficacy of first-line XELIRI with or without bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of two phase II studies.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 560-560
Author(s):  
P. Garcia-Alfonso ◽  
S. Alvarez ◽  
A. Munoz ◽  
P. Lopez ◽  
C. Riesco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
First Line ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

560 Background: The safety and efficacy of first-line XELIRI (capecitabine in combination with irinotecan) and XELIRI plus bevacizumab (BEV) have been evaluated in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). To date, however, no randomized studies comparing these regimens have been performed. This retrospective analysis compared efficacy and safety data for the two regimens from separate phase II studies performed at a single institution. Methods: Patients with histologically documented metastatic or recurrent CRC and no prior treatment for advanced disease received irinotecan 175 mg/m2 on day 1 and oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 2-8 every 2 weeks (XELIRI study). For patients age ≥65 years, the starting doses of irinotecan and capecitabine were reduced to 140 mg/m2 and 750 mg/m2, respectively. In the second study, patients received the same regimen plus BEV 5 mg/kg on day 1 (XELIRI + BEV study). Results: A total of 53 and 46 patients were entered into the XELIRI and XELIRI + BEV studies, respectively. Patient characteristics were generally similar in both groups. Efficacy results for the ITT populations are summarized in the Table. Patients treated with XELIRI + BEV had a significantly higher ORR and longer median TTP vs. XELIRI alone and a numerically longer median OS was observed (p=NS). The overall incidence of adverse events (all grades or grade 3/4) was similar in the two groups, although alopecia, mucositis, hand–foot syndrome, and haemorrhage were more common with XELIRI + BEV vs. XELIRI alone (all p<0.05). Conclusions: In this retrospective comparison of two studies, the addition of BEV to XELIRI appeared to improve outcome relative to XELIRI alone in the first-line treatment of patients with mCRC. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prescribing patterns for bevacizumab in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: Exploring the introduction of a new drug into routine clinical practice.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 665-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Maree Field ◽  
Jayesh Desai ◽  
Jeanne Tie ◽  
Suzanne Kosmider ◽  
Susie Bae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

665 Background: Clinical trials support the addition of bevacizumab (Bev) to first line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, given that there are alternate biological agents that can be used with chemotherapy; and rare but potentially serious toxicities with Bev, there has been variable use of the drug in routine care. The purpose of this study was to prospectively explore 1st line use of Bev in routine clinical care. Methods: A multi-site data collection was initiated in July 2009 when Bev became publicly available in Australia. A particular focus was capturing information regarding clinician decision-making that is not routinely recorded or is often poorly documented. Comprehensive comorbidity data was collected, along with specific factors, both patient (pt) and disease-related, that may impact on treatment decisions. Major adverse events that may be related to Bev were also recorded. Results: For the 2-year period from July 2009-June 2011, a database search identified 278 pts diagnosed with mCRC at five participating hospitals. 240 pts (86%) had received 1st line chemotherapy. 102 (43%) also received Bev, the majority in combination with oxaliplatin based chemotherapy (n = 81, 79%). Bev use increased significantly from 40.4% (34/84) of all pts receiving chemotherapy in July-December 2009, to 65.8% (25/38) in January-June 2011 (p=0.0114). Overall the most frequent reasons for clinicians advising against the use of Bev were a bleeding or asymptomatic primary in situ (n=28, 23%), known hypertension (n=14, 11%), clinical trial participation (n=14, 11%), poor performance status (n=9, 7%), and perceived risk of arterial ischemic event (n=8, 6.5%). There have been four episodes of gastro-intestinal perforation, 3 in pts receiving Bev (2.9% of Bev treated patients). Conclusions: Bev use in first line mCRC has significantly increased over time, presumably as further positive safety data emerges regarding safety in older and frailer pts, and clinician prescribing experience increases. The major grounds for not using Bev in the 1st line mCRC setting were specific clinical contexts where the risk of adverse events may be increased.

The efficacy of first-line IRIS with or without bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of two phase II studies.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14604-e14604
Author(s):  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Hiraku Fukushima ◽  
Toraji Amano ◽  
Michio Nakamura ◽  
Mineo Kudo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
First Line ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Study Results

e14604 Background: The safety and efficacy of first-line IRIS (S-1 in combination with irinotecan; Komatsu Y, et al. Oncology, 2011) and IRIS/Bev (IRIS in combination with bevacizumab (Bev); Komatsu Y, et al. Acta Oncol, 2012/Yuki S, et al. 2013 ASCO-GI) have been evaluated in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This time, no randomized studies comparing these regimens have been performed. This retrospective analysis compared efficacy and safety data for the two regimens from separate phase II studies performed at Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group (HGCSG). Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed unresectable metastatic or recurrent CRC and received no prior chemotherapy were enrolled. In the first trial, patients received irinotecan 100 mg/m2 on day 1,15 and oral S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 every 4 weeks (IRIS study: HGCSG0302). In the second trial, patients received the same regimen plus Bev 5 mg/kg on day 1,15 (IRIS/Bev study). Results: A total of 40 and 52 patients were enrolled the IRIS and IRIS/Bev studies, respectively. Patient characteristics were generally similar in both groups, whereas there were more cases of good performance status and less number of metastatic organ in IRIS/Bev group. The median overall survival was 39.6 months in IRIS/Bev, as compared with 23.4 months in IRIS, corresponding to a hazard ratio for death of 0.418 (p<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 17.0 months in IRIS/Bev, as compared with 8.6 months in IRIS (hazard ratio for disease progression, 0.418; p<0.001); the corresponding response rate were 63.5 percent and 52.5 percent (p=0.393).In a multivariate analysis of PFS and OS, IRIS/Bev (n=52) was significantly associated with longer PFS and OS compared with IRIS alone (n=40). Conclusions: In this retrospective comparison of two studies, the addition of Bev to IRIS appeared to improve outcome compared with IRIS alone in the first-line treatment of patients with mCRC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document