Efficacy of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated results from a large observational registry in the US (BRiTE)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3537-3537 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kozloff ◽  
J. Hainsworth ◽  
S. Badarinath ◽  
A. Cohn ◽  
P. Flynn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
First Line ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Large Community ◽  
Primary Disease ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Site

3537 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) when added to standard chemotherapy (CT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). BRiTE is a large, community-based observational registry of patients with mCRC receiving BV plus first-line CT. Safety and efficacy information in unselected patients with mCRC are collected. Chemotherapy regimen choice is at the physician’s discretion. Methods: 1968 patients receiving BV plus first-line CT were enrolled at 248 sites in 49 states between Feb 2004 and Jun 2005. Patients are followed for up to 3 years, with data reporting every 3 months (mo) including disease status as assessed by investigator using his/her method of choice. Patients were grouped twice by CT. Cox regression models, adjusted and unadjusted for treatment assignment, were used to identify baseline characteristics (BC) and differential chemotherapy effects on PFS. Results: Cohort demographics were consistent with the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for mCRC. Median study follow-up was 10 months by Nov 4, 2005. CT regimens included FOLFOX (55.8%), FOLFIRI (14.1%), and IFL (9.7%). Based on observed progression events (n=800) or deaths (n=123), projected median PFS is 11.3 mo (95% CI: 10.4–11.7). Median PFS was comparable in patients treated with CT regimen based on irinotecan (11.3 mo), oxaliplatin (11.4 mo), or neither (10.2 mo) (CT Grouping 1); or 5FU infusion (11.5 mo), 5-FU bolus (9.7 mo), or capecitabine (11.6 mo) (CT Grouping 2). Significant BC in adjusted and unadjusted models are ECOG performance status (PS), primary disease site, and albumin, with no significant difference among CT regimens. Conclusions: This large, community-based registry included a patient population with demographics consistent with the SEER database for mCRC. Preliminary median PFS of 11.3 mo compares favorably to that reported in the pivotal trial. Median PFS appears to be comparable for all CTs when combined with BV. Higher baseline albumin, PS of 0, and primary disease site of rectum were associated with improved outcome. [Table: see text]

Risk factors for gastrointestinal perforations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving bevacizumab plus chemotherapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3535-3535 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sugrue ◽  
M. Kozloff ◽  
J. Hainsworth ◽  
S. Badarinath ◽  
A. Cohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Large Community ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Potential Risk Factors

3535 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival when added to standard chemotherapy in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). BRiTE is a large, community-based observational registry of pts with mCRC receiving BV plus first-line chemotherapy (CT). Incidence rate, temporal pattern, and potential risk factors associated with gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) were explored. Methods: Baseline patient characteristics (BC), including prospectively identified potential risk factors for GIP, were collected at study entry. Safety data were collected every 3 months (mo). Logistic regression models, adjusted and unadjusted for treatment assignment, were used to identify BC potentially associated with GIP. Results: 1968 pts were enrolled between Feb 2004 and Jun 2005. Median study follow-up was 10 mo as of Nov 4, 2005. GIPs were observed in 34 pts (1.7%). For pts with GIP, median time to first event was 2.1 mo; the majority of events were non-fatal and occurred within the first 3 mo after starting BV. BC including GI medical history (chronic aspirin or NSAID use, peptic ulcer disease, diverticulosis) were similar in pts with or without GIP and with earlier or later GIP onset (≤ or >3 mo from start of BV). Although adjusted models did not show any significant BC, GIP rates were numerically higher in pts with primary tumor intact (2.6%) vs. resected (1.6%). Furthermore, univariate analyses revealed a significant difference between intact (2.3%) and resected (0.8%) primary tumor for earlier GIP (≤3 mo from start of BV). The majority of pts with GIP had at least one of the following: acute diverticulitis, intra-abdominal abscess, gastrointestinal obstruction, tumor at GIP site, abdominal carcinomatosis, prior abdominal or pelvic radiation therapy. Conclusions: Preliminary analyses indicate the incidence of GIP in this large, community-based observational registry is similar to that previously reported in phase III mCRC trials with BV. No associations between specific BCs and an increased risk of GIP were identified. Patients with primary tumor intact were more likely to incur a GIP within the first 3 mo of starting BV and CT. [Table: see text]

Safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated results from a large observational registry in the US (BRiTE)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3536-3536 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hedrick ◽  
M. Kozloff ◽  
J. Hainsworth ◽  
S. Badarinath ◽  
A. Cohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
First Line ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Large Community ◽  
Grade 3

3536 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival when added to standard chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). BRiTE is a large, community-based observational registry of patients with mCRC receiving BV plus first-line chemotherapy. Safety and efficacy information in unselected patients with mCRC are collected. Chemotherapy regimen choice is at the physician’s discretion. Methods: To facilitate and evaluate enrollment of a typical community-based mCRC population, eligibility criteria were minimized. Cohort demographics were consistent with the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for mCRC. Patients are followed for up to 3 years, and safety data including targeted BV-associated serious adverse events (SAEs) are updated every 3 months (mo). Results are based on descriptive analyses and are not adjusted for propensity of treatment, baseline characteristics, and treatment effects. Results: 1968 patients were enrolled between Feb 2004 and Jun 2005. Median study follow-up was 10 mo by Nov 4, 2005. SAEs were reported in 12.0% of patients including gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) (1.7%), postoperative bleeding/wound healing complications (1.2%), arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) (2.1%), and grade 3–4 bleeding (1.9%). 3.2% of patients discontinued BV due to a BV-related toxicity, most commonly bleeding. For patients with the respective event(s), median time to first event was 2.1 mo for GIP, 3.5 mo for ATE and 4.0 mo for grade 3–4 bleeding. 8.9% of patients with no history of hypertension (HTN) developed HTN requiring medication and 6.2% of patients who had HTN requiring medication at baseline experienced worsening of their HTN while on study treatment. Conclusions: In this unselected population of patients with mCRC, the safety profile of BV plus various chemotherapy regimens appears consistent with that observed in the pivotal BV trial. Overall discontinuation of BV due to a BV-related toxicity was uncommon. In this large community-based observational registry, no new BV associated safety issues have been identified. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and Toxicity of Addition of Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 718-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Cong Ruan ◽  
Yue-Ping Che ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
Hai-Feng Li
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Clinical Prognosis ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Pre-treated patients with first-line treatment can be offered a second treatment with the aim of improving their poor clinical prognosis. The therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who did not respond to first-line therapy has limited treatment options. Recently, many studies have paid much attention to the efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared with bevacizumab-naive based chemotherapy as second-line treatment in people with metastatic CRC. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies updated to March 2018. Randomized-controlled trials comparing addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy without bevacizumab in MCRC patients were included, of which, the main interesting results were the efficacy and safety profiles of the addition of bevacizumab in patients with MCRC as second-line therapy. Result: Five trials were eligible in the meta-analysis. Patients who received the combined bevacizumab and chemotherapy treatment in MCRC as second-line therapy showed a longer overall survival (OS) (OR=0.80,95%CI=0.72-0.89, P<0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (OR=0.69,95%CI=0.61-0.77, P<0.00001). In addition, there was no significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.36,95%CI=0.82-2.24, P=0.23) or severe adverse event (SAE) (RR=1.02,95%CI=0.88-1.19, P=0.78) between bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and bevacizumabnaive based chemotherapy. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the addition of bevacizumab to the chemotherapy therapy could be an efficient and safe treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer as second-line therapy and without increasing the risk of an adverse event.

scholarly journals Comparison of irinotecan and oxaliplatin as the first-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadayuki Kawai ◽  
Nozomi Takeshima ◽  
Yu Hayasaka ◽  
Akifumi Notsu ◽  
Mutsumi Yamazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
First Line ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Incidence

Abstract Background Irinotecan (IRI) and oxaliplatin (Ox) are standard therapeutic agents of the first-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Previous meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that treatment with Ox-based compared with IRI-based regimens was associated with better overall survival (OS). However, these reports did not include trials of molecular targeting agents and did not take methods for the administration of concomitant drugs, such as bolus or continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil, into account. A systematic literature review was performed to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles between IRI- and Ox-based regimens as the first-line treatments for mCRC. Methods This meta-analysis used data from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and SCOPUS. The primary endpoint was OS, and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Results Nineteen trials involving 4571 patients were included in the analysis. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of OS, PFS, and ORR. There was no significant heterogeneity. Regarding ≥ grade 3 AEs, IRI-based regimens were associated with a high incidence of leukopenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea. Moreover, there was a high incidence of thrombocytopenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy in patients who received Ox-based regimens. In a subgroup analysis, IRI combined with bevacizumab was correlated with a better PFS (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82–0.98, P = 0.02), but not with OS (pooled HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.80–1.03, P = 0.15). Conclusion Although the safety profiles of IRI- and Ox-based regimens varied, their efficacy did not significantly differ. The combination of anti-VEGF antibody and IRI was associated with better PFS compared with anti-VEGF antibody and Ox. Both regimens could be used as the first-line treatments for mCRC with consideration of the patients’ condition or toxicity profiles.

scholarly journals Mutational Analysis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer in CALGB/SWOG 80405 Identifies New Roles of Microsatellite Instability and Tumor Mutational Burden for Patient Outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (14) ◽  
pp. 1217-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Innocenti ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Xueping Qu ◽  
Tyler J. Zemla ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Mutational Burden ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden

PURPOSE CALGB/SWOG 80405 was a randomized phase III trial that found no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) in patients with first-line metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy plus either bevacizumab or cetuximab. Primary tumor DNA from 843 patients has been used to discover genetic markers of OS. PATIENTS AND METHODS Gene mutations were determined by polymerase chain reaction. Microsatellite status was determined by genotyping of microsatellites. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined by next-generation sequencing. Cox proportional hazard models were used, with adjusting factors. Interaction of molecular alterations with either the bevacizumab or the cetuximab arms was tested. RESULTS Patients with high TMB in their tumors had longer OS than did patients with low TMB (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95]; P = .02). In patients with microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) tumors, longer OS was observed in the bevacizumab arm than in the cetuximab arm (HR, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.30]; interaction P < .001 for interaction between microsatellite status and the two arms). Patients with BRAF mutant tumors had shorter OS than did patients with wild-type (WT) tumors (HR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.49 to 2.71]; P < .001). Patients with extended RAS mutant tumors had shorter OS than did patients with WT tumors (HR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.26 to 1.84]; P < .001). Patients with triple-negative tumors (WT for NRAS/ KRAS/ BRAF) had a median OS of 35.9 months (95% CI, 33.0 to 38.8 months) versus 22.2 months (95% CI, 19.6 to 24.4 months ) in patients with at least one mutated gene in their tumors ( P < .001). CONCLUSION In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in first line, low TMB, and BRAF and RAS mutations are negative prognostic factors. Patients with MSI-H tumors benefited more from bevacizumab than from cetuximab, and studies to confirm this effect of MSI-H are warranted.

Observational cohort study of first-line bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (HGCSG0802): Comparison of infusional FU/oxaliplatin(OX)+BV and oral FU/OX+BV.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 527-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuteru Hatanaka ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Hiroshi Nakatsumi ◽  
Hiraku Fukushima ◽  
Hirohito Naruse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Observational Cohort

527 Background: A few reports have shown no difference between the efficacy of infusional FU and that of oral FU (Capecitabine/S-1) for colorectal cancer, and some studies have reported the non-inferiority between infusional FU/Oxaliplatin (OX) and oral FU/OX for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We performed a sub-group comparison between infusional FU/OX (mFOLFOX6 + BV: iFU) and oral FU/OX (CapeOX/SOX + BV: oFU) from the HGCSG0802 observational cohort study with investigated Japanese patients (pts) treated with first line BV for mCRC. Methods: The objective of HGCSG0802 was to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment-failure (TTF), response rate (RR), safety and so on. The key eligibility criteria of HGCSG0802 were with evaluable lesions, older than 20 years, ECOG PS 0-2, and this analysis used the cohort treated with OX-based regimens.In this analysis, pts characteristics, RR and safety were compared using Fisher’s exact test. PFS and TTF were compared using log-rank test. Results: Of 108 pts (the full analysis set), 95 pts were evaluable for treated with OX-based regimens. Forty-eight pts (50.5%) were treated with iFU and 47 pts (49.5%) were treated with oFU (CapeOX + BV 42 pts/SOX + BV 5 pts). The pts characteristics between those were generally balanced except for PS 0-1 (72.9% in iFU/93.6% in oFU; p=0.012) and synchronous liver metastases (mets) (93.8% in iFU/78.8% in oFU; p=0.040). Adverse events ≥grade 3 were balanced except for leucopenia (25.0% in iFU versus 2.1% in oFU; p=0.002) and neutropenia (43.5% in iFU and 10.9% in oFU; p=0.001). Hand-foot skin reaction was not different between two cohorts. RR was 62.5% in iFU versus 71.1% in oFU (p=0.835). The median PFS was 8.3 months in iFU versus 8.2 months in oFU (p=0.835). Conclusions: The HGCSG0802 could be a database to investigate first line BV for mCRC in clinical practice. As a result of this analysis, in Japanese daily practice, efficacy was no significant difference between infusional FU/OX and oral FU/OX, and the profiles of adverse events varied from each regimens.

Polymorphism of the chemokine CXCR4 to predict treatment benefit of first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 635-635
Author(s):  
Satoshi Matsusaka ◽  
Fotios Loupakis ◽  
Wu Zhang ◽  
Shu Cao ◽  
Dongyun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Candidate Snps ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference

635 Background: The chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 promote angiogenesis and the migration of tumor cells into the metastatic sites in many cancers. CXCR4 expression on tumor cells is upregulated by hypoxia and angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor. Therefore, we analyzed the association between CXCR4/CXCL12 polymorphisms and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients underwent bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. Methods: This study included 144 Japanese patients (pts) for evaluation set and 424 patients from two clinical trials (204 of TRIBE arm A and 220 of PROVETTA) for validation set, with mCRC treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy as first line. A total of 144 Japanese pts with (male/female; 81/63, median age 61 years, median follow-up 4.2 years) and 424 pts (male/female; 252/172, median age 62 years; median follow-up time; 2.8 years) were enrolled in a pharmacogenomics translational study. Genomic DNA was extracted from the pts’ blood or tissue. One CXCR4 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) (rs2228014) and two CXCL12 SNPs (rs1801157, rs3740085) were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. All candidate SNPs were analyzed for association with the clinical outcome. Results: In univariate analysis, CXCR4 rs2228014 showed a significant difference in PFS [(G/G 15.3 months, any A allele 13.7 months, HR (95% CI) 1.64 (1.01-2.68), p=0.036)]. After multivariate analysis, CXCR4 rs2228014 remained to be a significant for PFS [HR (95% CI) 1.67 (1.01-2.78), p =0.046]. However, this polymorphism was not associated with tumor response and survival. In the validation cohort, pts with GG genotype had significantly longer PFS compared to those with any A allele (10.5 vs 9.6 months, HR (95% CI) 1.40 (1.02-1.93), p =0.035). CXCL12 polymorphisms were not associated with the clinical outcome. Conclusions: This study shows for the first time that CXCR4 rs2228014 may serve as a predictive marker in patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy.

Effect of first-line molecular targeted agents on the efficacy of second-line bevacizumab-containing regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 748-748
Author(s):  
Hiroko Hasegawa ◽  
Hiroya Taniguchi ◽  
Seiichiro Mitani ◽  
Azusa Komori ◽  
Toshiki Masuishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Prior Use ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Molecular Targeted Agents

748 Background: Bevacizumab (BV)-containing regimen is a standard second-line chemotherapy(CTX) for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) regardless of the prior use of BV in the first-line CTX. However, little is known about the efficacy of the second-line BV-containing regimen after first-line CTX with anti-EGFR agents. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of a BV-containing regimen as the second-line CTX for mCRC. The eligibility criteria for the pts included in the study were as follows: ECOG PS 0–2, KRAS wild-type tumors, and refractory to first-line CTX with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin or irinotecan from March 2007 to March 2015. The Kaplan–Meier method with a log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of the pts. Results: A total of 123 pts were eligible. The pts’ characteristics were as follows: males/females 73/50, median age 59 years, PS 0-1/2 118/5, LDH levels < 400IU/l / ≥ 400IU/l 91/32, second-line CTX regimen FOLFIRI+BV/FOLFOX+BV 111/12. The patients were categorized into the following 3 cohorts according to the prior use of molecular targeted agents: anti EGFR agents (cohort E, 35 pts), BV (cohort B, 58 pts), no molecular targeted agents (cohort C, 30 pts). There was hardly any difference in the baseline characteristics of the 3 cohorts; however, LDH levels in cohort E were higher than those in the other cohorts. Treatment efficacies were as follows (cohort E/B/C): response rate, 30%/10%/20%, with a significant difference between cohort E and B (OR = 1.50, p = 0.035) and median PFS, 8.6/5.9/6.9 months, with a significant difference between cohort E and B (p = 0.025). Multivariate analyses for PFS were adjusted for baseline characteristics such as histology, PS, chemotherapy regimen, presence of peritoneal metastasis, LDH levels, and duration of PFS in the first-line CTX. The PFS of cohort E was better than that of cohort B (HR = 2.180, p = 0.0025) and was not much different from that of cohort C (HR = 1.682, p = 0.64)in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: The second-line BV-containing regimen is effective regardless of the prior use of anti-EGFR agents.

Phase III Trial of Cetuximab With Continuous or Intermittent Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) Versus FLOX Alone in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The NORDIC-VII Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15) ◽  
pp. 1755-1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjell Magne Tveit ◽  
Tormod Guren ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Per Pfeiffer ◽  
Halfdan Sorbye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Line Treatment

Purpose The NORDIC-VII multicenter phase III trial investigated the efficacy of cetuximab when added to bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX), administered continuously or intermittently, in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The influence of KRAS mutation status on treatment outcome was also investigated. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard Nordic FLOX (arm A), cetuximab and FLOX (arm B), or cetuximab combined with intermittent FLOX (arm C). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), response rate, R0 resection rate, and safety were secondary end points. Results Of the 571 patients randomly assigned, 566 were evaluable in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. KRAS and BRAF mutation analyses were obtained in 498 (88%) and 457 patients (81%), respectively. KRAS mutations were present in 39% of the tumors; 12% of tumors had BRAF mutations. The presence of BRAF mutations was a strong negative prognostic factor. In the ITT population, median PFS was 7.9, 8.3, and 7.3 months for the three arms, respectively (not significantly different). OS was almost identical for the three groups (20.4, 19.7, 20.3 months, respectively), and confirmed response rates were 41%, 49%, and 47%, respectively. In patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, cetuximab did not provide any additional benefit compared with FLOX alone. In patients with KRAS mutations, no significant difference was detected, although a trend toward improved PFS was observed in arm B. The regimens were well tolerated. Conclusion Cetuximab did not add significant benefit to the Nordic FLOX regimen in first-line treatment of mCRC.

scholarly journals Efferent therapy in the first-line drug treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

2018 ◽  
pp. 172-175
Author(s):  
Z. S. Kotova ◽  
T. Yu. Semiglazova ◽  
I. A. Baldueva ◽  
D. H. Latipova ◽  
D. O. Yurlov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Genetic Characteristics ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Line Drug

The aim of this study is to analyse the efficacy of efferent therapy (hemosorption) as part of drug treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on the use of standard first-line chemotherapy combined with the bevacizumab biosimilar. The study included 54 patients with histologically verified mCRC who received the first-line FOLFOX + bevacizumab therapy in combination with and without hemosorption. All patients of the FOLFOX + bevacizumab (+) hemosorption group (n = 32) received the hemosorption using Hemophoenix apparatus on Day 4 of the cycle during the first 6 cycles. A total of 182 hemosorption procedures were performed. The control group included 22 patients receiving the FOLFOX + bevacizumab regimen without hemosorption. The bevacizumab biosimilar was introduced in both groups throughout the treatment at standard doses once every 2 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups in the main clinical, pathomorphological, molecular genetic characteristics (sex, age, ECOG status, localization of primary tumor, tumor differentiation, RAS, BRAF mutations, microsatellite instability, etc.).Blood sampling to evaluate the effect of hemosorption on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of bevacizumab biosimilar was performed during the 2nd cycle before (PK1) and after (PK2) hemosorption procedures. The bevacizumab biosimilar concentration in the blood of patients before and after hemosorption showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0,423).The use of pharmaceutical treatment in the FOLFOX + bevacizumab (+) hemosorption group contributed to the achievement of an objective response (OR) in 62% of patients (p = 0.001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 ± 0.9 months [95% CI 8.3-11.7] in the FOLFOX + bevacizumab (+) hemosorption group, and 7 ± 0.5 months [95% CI 4.4-11.6] in the FOLFOX + bevacizumab (-) hemosorption group. There was no significant difference in PFS between the groups of patients treated with FOLFOX + bevacizumab regimen with and without hemosorption (p = 0.445).There were statistically significant differences in the frequency of nausea, diarrhoea and asthenia in the FOLFOX + bevacizumab (+) hemosorption group. The analysis of the dynamics of the quality of life (QoL) level before and after treatment showed that QoL level related to health (p = 0.0001) as well as the emotional (p = 0.0001) and social (p = 0,04) functioning increased in patients receiving the FOLFOX + bevacizumab regimen in combination with hemosorption, 0,039).Thus, the addition of hemosorption to the first-line drug treatment according to the FOLFOX + bevacizumab regimen does not affect bevacizumab pharmacokinetics, increases the frequency of objective response, reduces toxicity of the therapy and improves the quality of patients’ life indicators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document