Panitumumab activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) with low or negative tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) levels: An updated analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4082-4082 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. P. Mitchell ◽  
J. R. Hecht ◽  
J. Baranda ◽  
I. Malik ◽  
D. Richards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Membrane Staining ◽  
Negative Tumor ◽  
Grade 3

4082 Background: Panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against EGFr, is approved for EGFr-expressing mCRC pts with disease progression (PD) on or after fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy. However, the predictive value of EGFr tumor-membrane staining as measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is undetermined. Methods: This multicenter, single arm, phase 2 study enrolled pts with documented PD during or after fluoropyrimidine and adequate doses of irinotecan and oxaliplatin, and within 6 months after the most recent chemotherapy regimen (determined by an independent eligibility review committee [IERC]), 2–3 prior regimens, and low (1%-9%) or negative (<1%) EGFr tumor membrane staining (by IHC). Pts received panitumumab 6mg/kg Q2W until PD or intolerability. Tumor assessments (modified WHO, blinded central review) were performed every 8 weeks until PD or discontinuation. Endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) through wk 16 (+ =4 wk confirmation; primary), overall ORR, response duration, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety (secondary). Results: In this interim analysis, 91 pts had =20 wks of potential follow-up and comprised the IERC efficacy set; 118 pts comprised the evaluable safety set (=20 wks potential follow-up). In the IERC efficacy set, 57% were male, 86% were white, and median age (range) was 61 (26–85) years. ORR through week 16 is shown; overall ORR was the same ( Table ). The most common adverse events (all, grade 3/4) were dermatitis acneiform (72%, 6%), erythema (69%, 6%), pruritus (65%, 4%), and hypomagnesaemia by lab values (53%, 10%). Four pts (3%) had an infusion reaction per investigator (1 was grade 3). Conclusions: This analysis confirms earlier findings that panitumumab has anti-tumor activity in pts with low or undetectable EGFr tumor membrane levels as measured by IHC. This study has completed enrollment, and updated data will be presented. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Panitumumab antitumor activity in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) expressing low (1–9%) or negative (<1%) levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3547-3547 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Hecht ◽  
E. Mitchell ◽  
J. Baranda ◽  
I. Malik ◽  
D. Richards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Tumor Expression

3547 Background: Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against EGFr. We investigated the antitumor activity of panitumumab in pts with mCRC who failed prior therapy and had low or negative EGFr tumor expression. Methods: In this multicenter, phase 2 study of 150 planned pts, pts had documentation of disease progression (PD) during or after adequate doses of fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (centrally confirmed refractory disease [CCRD]), 2–3 prior regimens, ECOG score 0–2, and low or negative EGFr staining (by IHC) in evaluable tumor cells. Pts received panitumumab at 6 mg/kg Q2W until PD or drug intolerability. Tumor assessments (modified WHO, blinded central review) were taken periodically from wk 8 until PD. Endpoints were objective response (OR) through wk 16 (+ ≥ 4 wk confirmation; primary) and OR throughout study, response duration, progression-free survival (PFS) time, survival time, and safety (secondary). Results: In this interim analysis (6/05), 88 pts were enrolled and had ≥ 1 dose of panitumumab (safety set); 23 pts had ≥ 20 wks before the cutoff and CCRD (efficacy set). The efficacy set consisted of 16M/7W, median age of 65 (range: 46, 85) yrs, 83% white, 100% with ECOG ≤ 1, 74% colon cancer and 26% rectal cancer; all received ≥ 2 prior regimens (equivalent characteristics for safety set). 2/11 (18%) pts with EGFr-negative tumors and 1/12 (8%) with low EGFr staining had a partial response. Duration was up to 16 wks. 7/23 (30%) of all pts had SD. Median (95% CI) PFS was 7.9 (7.0, 23.0) wks. In the safety set, all pts had a treatment-related adverse event; 19% grade (gr) 3; 2% gr 4. Integument and eye toxicities were: 92% skin, 17% eye, 28% nail, 8% hair, and 2% chelitis. 20 (23%) had diarrhea (1 gr 3); 7 (8%) had hypomagnesemia (2 gr 3/4). Three pts had an infusion reaction-1 gr 3 (led to panitumumab discontinuation) and 2 gr 1/2. In 65 pts with both a baseline and post-baseline sample, no human anti-human antibodies to panitumumab were detected. Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: Responses to panitumumab were seen in pts with mCRC with both low and negative EGFr levels. Efficacy appears similar to that in other studies with panitumumab in pts with higher EGFr tumor levels. [Table: see text]

Panitumumab antitumor activity in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) expressing ≥ 10% epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3548-3548 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Berlin ◽  
M. Neubauer ◽  
P. Swanson ◽  
W. G. Harker ◽  
H. Burris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Tumor Expression

3548 Background: Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against EGFr. We investigated panitumumab antitumor activity in pts who failed prior therapy and had EGFr tumor expression levels ≥ 10%. Methods: In this multicenter, phase 2 study of 300 planned pts, pts had documentation of disease progression (PD) during or following adequate doses of fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (centrally confirmed refractory disease [CCRD]), 2–3 prior regimens, ECOG score 0–2, and EGFr staining (by IHC) in ≥ 10% of evaluable tumor cells. Pts received panitumumab at 6 mg/kg Q2W until PD. Tumor assessments (modified WHO, blinded central review) were taken periodically from wk 8–48 until PD. Study endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) at wk 16 (+ ≥ 4 wk confirmation; primary) and ORR throughout study, response duration, progression-free survival (PFS) time, survival time, and safety (secondary). Results: In this interim analysis (5/05), 91 enrolled pts received ≥ 1 dose of panitumumab (safety set); 39 had ≥ 20 wks before the cutoff and CCRD (efficacy set). The efficacy set consisted of 23M/16W, mean (SD) age of 58.6 (10.1) years, 82% white, 95% ECOG ≤ 1, 74% colon cancer and 26% rectal cancer; all had ≥ 2 prior regimens (equivalent characteristics for safety set). At wk 16, 3 (8%) had a partial response, 8 (21%) had stable disease, and 19 (49%) had PD as best OR (9 not done/unevaluable). At the time of this interim analysis, response durations were 12.4, 13.2, and 14.0 wks. In the safety set, 96% had at least 1 treatment-related adverse event (24% grade [gr] 3, 1% gr 4, 1% gr 5). Integument and eye toxicities were: 96% skin, 30% nail, 8% eye, 5% hair, and 7% chelitis. 25 (27%) had diarrhea (3 gr 3); 11 (12%) had hypomagnesemia (3 gr 3/4). One pt had a gr 3 hypersensitivity reaction considered related to panitumumab, received medication, and the event resolved; this pt continued treatment with premedication; no further reactions occurred. In 66 pts with both a baseline and postdose sample, no human anti-human antibodies to panitumumab were detected.Additional data will be presented. Conclusions: Panitumumab has antitumor activity and is well tolerated in pts with EGFr tumor expression levels ≥ 10% who failed standard chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

Apatinib combined with Raltitrexed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard therapy (AHEAD-311): A single-arm phrase II pilot trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15008-e15008
Author(s):  
Haiyan Si ◽  
Miaomiao Gou ◽  
Yong Zhang ◽  
Huan Yan ◽  
Niansong Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Grade 3

e15008 Background: To assess the safety and efficacy of apatinib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, combined with thymidylate synthase inhibitor raltitrexed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as a third- or later-line therapy. Methods: Patients with mCRC after at least 2 lines of chemotherapy were enrolled whenever they previously treated with bevacizumab or not. Apatinib was given orally at 250mg or 500mg daily. Raltitrexed was administered intravenously at 3 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS). The second endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: From August 2017 to November 2018, thirty-one patients were enrolled in Chinese PLA General Hospital. After a median follow-up of 6.4 months, the median treatment cycle was 4. four patient achieved partial response(PR), and 11 patients achieved stable disease (SD) and 16 achieved progression disease (PD) in accordance with RECIST version 1.0, illustrating a DCR of 48.4% and an ORR of 12.9% .The Median PFS was 2.4 months and the median OS was 6.4 months. The most common adverse events were hypertension (n=12, 38.7%), nausea and vomiting (n=11, 33.8%), myelosuppression (n=9, 29.0%). The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were hypertension (n=2, 6.4%) and hand-foot syndrome (n=2, 6.4%). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities were rare. One patient died from cardiac arrest after three days treatment. There was no significantly association between PFS or OS, and clinical features including tumor location, KRAS status, and prior surgery or not, and number of metastatic organs. There was no trend showing patients who experienced had hypertension or myelosuppression had longer PFS and OS. Compared to the patients never received bevacizumab, the patients who had previously bevacizumab had the similar PFS and OS (3.9 versus 2.3months, P=0.787; 6.1 versus 6.4months, P=0.287). Grade1-2 nausea and vomiting and age <57 were independent predictors for longer PFS and OS. Conclusions: Apatinib combined with raltitrexed had efficacy but had limited survival benefit in mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapy. This regime showed us a higher risk of adverse event incidence and warrant further exploring of benefit population. Clinical trial information: NCT03344614 .

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) therapy in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Two-year clinical update.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4040-4040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Vittorina Zagonel ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
M. Luisa Limon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Therapy Option ◽  
Grade 3

4040 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI had robust, durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (median follow-up 13.8 months [mo; range, 9–19]; Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up is presented here. Methods: Patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed (INV) objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: In 45 pts with median follow-up of 29.0 mo, ORR (95% CI) increased to 69% (53–82) (Table) from 60% (44.3–74.3); complete response (CR) rate increased to 13% from 7%. The concordance rate of INV and blinded independent central review was 89%. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (Table). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, and 24-mo rates were 74% and 79%, respectively (Table). Nineteen pts discontinued study treatment without subsequent therapy. An analysis of tumor response post discontinuation will be presented. Ten (22%) pts had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI continued to show robust, durable clinical benefit with a deepening of response, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L therapy option for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NTC02060188 . [Table: see text]

Predictive value of skin toxicity severity for response to panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): A pooled analysis of five clinical trials

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4134-4134 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Berlin ◽  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
M. Peeters ◽  
J. R. Hecht ◽  
R. Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Common Skin

4134 Background: Panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr), is approved for EGFr-expressing mCRC patients (pts) with disease progression (PD) on or following fluoropyrimidine (5FU)-, oxaliplatin (Ox)-, and irinotecan (Ir)-containing chemotherapy. Skin toxicities are common with panitumumab; we examined the association between severity of skin toxicity and panitumumab efficacy. Methods: Data from 5 clinical trials were pooled (4 phase II studies and 1 phase III study). Pts with mCRC had documented PD on or after 5FU, Ox, and/or Ir. Pts received panitumumab 6 mg/kg every two weeks (Q2W) or 2.5 mg/kg weekly (QW) until PD or intolerability. Tumors were assessed using modified WHO or RECIST criteria (blinded central review in 4/5 studies). Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). PFS and OS were measured from enrollment. Only pts with =2 infusions (exposure over 2 wks for QW dosing or over 4 weeks for Q2W dosing) were analyzed to help correct for lead-time bias. Results: 612 of 640 pts were included in the analysis set (62% were male, 92% were white, and median age [range] was 61 [21, 88] years). The median (95% CI) duration of PFS was 8.4 weeks (8.0 to 11.3), the median (95% CI) survival was 6.9 months (6.2 to 7.9), and the ORR (95% CI) was 9.0% (6.8 to 11.5). The most common skin toxicities (any grade, grade 3/4) were erythema (54%, 4%) pruritus (53%, 2%), dermatitis acneiform (52%, 5%), and rash (39%, 2%). ORR, PFS, and OS appeared to favor pts with grade 2–4 skin toxicity vs pts with grade 0- 1 skin toxicity ( table ). Conclusion: In this large combined analysis, severity of skin rash was correlated with increased efficacy of panitumumab in terms of ORR, PFS, and OS. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Toxicity and efficacy of salvage paclitaxel chemotherapy in Royal Marsden (RM) oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (OGA) patients (pts).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 188-188
Author(s):  
NOELIA TARAZONA ◽  
Elizabeth Catherine Smyth ◽  
Clare Peckitt ◽  
Ian Chau ◽  
David J. Watkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Grade 3

188 Background: Paclitaxel is a standard global salvage therapy for pts with advanced refractory OGA. Western pts may differ from Asian pts with respect to chemotherapy metabolism and cancer behaviour, and the benefits associated with paclitaxel in this setting have not been assessed outside of Asia. We examined the efficacy and toxicity associated with salvage paclitaxel for advanced OGA at RM over a 3 year period. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. We identified all pts with OGA treated with salvage weekly paclitaxel from 01/06/2011 to 21/02/2014 from the electronic pt record at RM. The following data was collected: demographics, metastatic sites, resection status, response/duration of response to prior chemotherapy, ECOG PS, haemoglobin, albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, CEA, CA19.9, RM prognostic score, CT response and date of progression, death or last follow up. Toxicity was collected as per NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (v4.0). Overall and progression free survival (OS/PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis examined the association between clinical and laboratory variables with survival. Results: 57 pts were identified. Pts were 74% male; median age 64y; 66% PS 0-1; 91% 2nd line. Median number cycles 3 (range 1-8). Median follow up 13.6m. Response rate was 18.4% in evaluable pts. OS and PFS were 5.8m (95% CI: 4.8 – 6.8m) and 2.6m (95% CI: 1.9 – 3.2m). 2y and 3y survival from start of 1st line treatment were 26% and 13%. In multivariate analyses PS ≥2 [HR 2.28, p = 0.018], and ALP ≥100 U/L, [HR=2.01, p= 0.033] were independent negative prognostic factors for OS. ≥ Grade 3 nausea, diarrhea and neuropathy were uncommon (<2% each), rate of ≥ grade 3 fatigue was 11%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 12%, 11% and 2% pts. Conclusions: Advanced OGA pts treated at RM with salvage paclitaxel have an OS equivalent to pts in clinical trials with less hematological toxicity than seen in Asian patients. This may be due to regional pharmacogenetic profiles. As a significant proportion of pts now survive 2-3y with limited toxicity, therapeutic nihilism is unwarranted.

Anlotinib in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Huang ◽  
Juxiang Xiao ◽  
Wentao Fang ◽  
Ping Lu ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Vegfr Inhibitor ◽  
Loss Of Appetite

95 Background: The treatment option for ESCC patients (pts) progressing after chemotherapy is still uncertain. Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor involved in tumor angiogenesis and growth, such as vascular endothelia growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 2/3, etc. Methods: Eligible pts were advanced ESCC who had progressed after platinum or taxane containing chemotherapy. Between January 6, 2016 and May 22, 2018, a total of 165 pts from 13 centers in China were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to anlotinib arm (n=110), and placebo arm (n=55). Pts were given anlotinib (12 mg/day) or placebo orally from day 1 to day 14 in a 21-day cycle until disease progression or had unacceptable toxic effects. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Median PFS was 3.0 months with anlotinib and 1.4 months with placebo (HR 0.5, 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P<0.0001). Complete response occured in 2 pts with anlotinib and 0 pt with placebo. The objective response rates were 7% in the anlotinib group and 4% in the placebo group (P=0.498), and the disease control rates (DCR) were 64% and 18%, respectively (P<0.0001). In anlotinib arm, median duration of response was 5.8 months (range, 3.1-19.7+). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 36.7% and 11.0% of the two group pts, and grade 5 TRAE were 2.8% and 0%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 TRAE (>5%) in anlotinib arm were hypertension (15.6%) and loss of appetite (5.5%). Median overall survival were similar between the groups (6.1 months vs 7.2 months; HR 1.2, 95%CI 0.8-1.8, P=0.4261). The ratio of pts received post study treatments was 41.2% (40/97) in anlotinib arm and 72.7% (40/55) in placebo arm (P=0.0002), including chemotherapy (23.7% vs 54.6%), PD-1 inhibitors (4.1% vs 11.0%), and Apatinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, (10.3% vs 20.0%), etc. Conclusions: In pretreated advanced ESCC pts, anlotinib significantly improved PFS and DCR compared with placebo, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02649361.

Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (P+T) in patients (Pts) with colorectal cancer (CRC) with ERBB2 amplification or overexpression: Results from the TAPUR Study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 132-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranju Gupta ◽  
Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer ◽  
Susan Halabi ◽  
Pam K. Mangat ◽  
Stacy D. D'Andre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity ◽  
Erbb2 Amplification ◽  
Erbb2 Overexpression

132 Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket trial evaluating anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of CRC pts with ERBB2 overexpression or amplification treated with P+T are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced CRC, no standard treatment (tx) options, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate organ function. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts had ERBB2 overexpression or amplification, or certain ERBB2 mutations. Recommended dosing after initial dosing was P, 420 mg IV over 30-60 mins every 3 weeks (wks) and T, 6 mg/kg over 30-60 mins every 3 wks. Simon two-stage design was used to test a null rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage 1 have disease control (DC) (objective response (OR) or stable disease at 16+ wks per RECIST (SD16+)), 18 more pts enrolled. If ≥7 of 28 pts have DC, the tx is worthy of further study. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Twenty-eight pts enrolled from November 2016 to September 2018 were evaluable for efficacy and safety. Demographics and outcomes are summarized in Table. All pts had ERBB2 amplification; 1 also had an ERBB2 mutation. 79% of pts had at least 3 prior txs. Four PR and 10 SD16+ were observed for DC and OR rates of 50% (90% CI, 36% to 60%) and 14% (95% CI, 4% to 33%), respectively. Two pts had at least one grade 3 AE or SAE at least possibly related to P+T including anemia, infusion reaction, and left ventricular dysfunction. Conclusions: The combination of P+T showed anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated CRC pts with ERBB2 amplification . Additional analyses by RAS mutation status are pending. Further study is warranted to confirm efficacy of P+T in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT02693535. [Table: see text]

Irinotecan, cetuximab, and bevacizumab (CBI) versus irinotecan, cetuximab, and placebo (CI) in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from an ACCRU network randomized phase II trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Marla Lipsyc-Sharf ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Matthew B. Yurgelun ◽  
Douglas Adam Rubinson ◽  
Deborah Schrag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Models ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

102 Background: Combination irinotecan and cetuximab is approved for irinotecan-refractory mCRC; it is unknown if the addition of bevacizumab would improve outcomes. We studied the efficacy and safety of CBI compared with CI in patients (pts) with RAS wildtype, irinotecan-refractory mCRC. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial, pts with RAS wildtype mCRC and no prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy who failed at least 1 irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimen and received bevacizumab in at least 1 prior line of therapy were randomized 1:1 to irinotecan 180 mg/m2 (or previously tolerated dose), cetuximab 500 mg/m2, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg vs CI every 2 wks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models stratified by number of prior lines of therapy and bevacizumab receipt in immediate prior line were performed. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). The study was closed early in January 2018 for reasons related to accrual and funding after enrollment of 36 out of a planned 60 pts. Results: Between July 2015 and December 2017, 36 pts were randomized (19 to CBI, 17 to CI). 34 pts (94%) were treated with 2 or more prior chemotherapy regimens. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms. Median PFS was 9.7 vs 5.5 mo for CBI and CI arms, respectively (log-rank P =0.76; multivariable HR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.25-1.66). Median OS was 19.7 vs 10.2 mo for CBI and CI (log-rank P= 0.04; multivariable HR = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15-1.09). ORR was 37% for CBI vs 12% for CI ( P =0.13). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 47% of pts receiving CBI vs 35% for CI ( P =0.46). Conclusions: In this prematurely discontinued trial, there were non-significant increases in PFS and ORR and a statistically significant 9.5 mo increase in median OS in favor of CBI compared to CI. Further investigation of CBI for treatment of irinotecan-refractory mCRC is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02292758.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document