Predictive value of skin toxicity severity for response to panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): A pooled analysis of five clinical trials

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4134-4134 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Berlin ◽  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
M. Peeters ◽  
J. R. Hecht ◽  
R. Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Common Skin

4134 Background: Panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr), is approved for EGFr-expressing mCRC patients (pts) with disease progression (PD) on or following fluoropyrimidine (5FU)-, oxaliplatin (Ox)-, and irinotecan (Ir)-containing chemotherapy. Skin toxicities are common with panitumumab; we examined the association between severity of skin toxicity and panitumumab efficacy. Methods: Data from 5 clinical trials were pooled (4 phase II studies and 1 phase III study). Pts with mCRC had documented PD on or after 5FU, Ox, and/or Ir. Pts received panitumumab 6 mg/kg every two weeks (Q2W) or 2.5 mg/kg weekly (QW) until PD or intolerability. Tumors were assessed using modified WHO or RECIST criteria (blinded central review in 4/5 studies). Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). PFS and OS were measured from enrollment. Only pts with =2 infusions (exposure over 2 wks for QW dosing or over 4 weeks for Q2W dosing) were analyzed to help correct for lead-time bias. Results: 612 of 640 pts were included in the analysis set (62% were male, 92% were white, and median age [range] was 61 [21, 88] years). The median (95% CI) duration of PFS was 8.4 weeks (8.0 to 11.3), the median (95% CI) survival was 6.9 months (6.2 to 7.9), and the ORR (95% CI) was 9.0% (6.8 to 11.5). The most common skin toxicities (any grade, grade 3/4) were erythema (54%, 4%) pruritus (53%, 2%), dermatitis acneiform (52%, 5%), and rash (39%, 2%). ORR, PFS, and OS appeared to favor pts with grade 2–4 skin toxicity vs pts with grade 0- 1 skin toxicity ( table ). Conclusion: In this large combined analysis, severity of skin rash was correlated with increased efficacy of panitumumab in terms of ORR, PFS, and OS. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Panitumumab antitumor activity in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) expressing low (1–9%) or negative (<1%) levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3547-3547 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Hecht ◽  
E. Mitchell ◽  
J. Baranda ◽  
I. Malik ◽  
D. Richards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Tumor Expression

3547 Background: Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against EGFr. We investigated the antitumor activity of panitumumab in pts with mCRC who failed prior therapy and had low or negative EGFr tumor expression. Methods: In this multicenter, phase 2 study of 150 planned pts, pts had documentation of disease progression (PD) during or after adequate doses of fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (centrally confirmed refractory disease [CCRD]), 2–3 prior regimens, ECOG score 0–2, and low or negative EGFr staining (by IHC) in evaluable tumor cells. Pts received panitumumab at 6 mg/kg Q2W until PD or drug intolerability. Tumor assessments (modified WHO, blinded central review) were taken periodically from wk 8 until PD. Endpoints were objective response (OR) through wk 16 (+ ≥ 4 wk confirmation; primary) and OR throughout study, response duration, progression-free survival (PFS) time, survival time, and safety (secondary). Results: In this interim analysis (6/05), 88 pts were enrolled and had ≥ 1 dose of panitumumab (safety set); 23 pts had ≥ 20 wks before the cutoff and CCRD (efficacy set). The efficacy set consisted of 16M/7W, median age of 65 (range: 46, 85) yrs, 83% white, 100% with ECOG ≤ 1, 74% colon cancer and 26% rectal cancer; all received ≥ 2 prior regimens (equivalent characteristics for safety set). 2/11 (18%) pts with EGFr-negative tumors and 1/12 (8%) with low EGFr staining had a partial response. Duration was up to 16 wks. 7/23 (30%) of all pts had SD. Median (95% CI) PFS was 7.9 (7.0, 23.0) wks. In the safety set, all pts had a treatment-related adverse event; 19% grade (gr) 3; 2% gr 4. Integument and eye toxicities were: 92% skin, 17% eye, 28% nail, 8% hair, and 2% chelitis. 20 (23%) had diarrhea (1 gr 3); 7 (8%) had hypomagnesemia (2 gr 3/4). Three pts had an infusion reaction-1 gr 3 (led to panitumumab discontinuation) and 2 gr 1/2. In 65 pts with both a baseline and post-baseline sample, no human anti-human antibodies to panitumumab were detected. Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: Responses to panitumumab were seen in pts with mCRC with both low and negative EGFr levels. Efficacy appears similar to that in other studies with panitumumab in pts with higher EGFr tumor levels. [Table: see text]

SELECT: Randomized phase III study of docetaxel (D) or pemetrexed (P) with or without cetuximab (C) in recurrent or progressive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based therapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7502-7502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward S. Kim ◽  
Marcus A. Neubauer ◽  
Allen Lee Cohn ◽  
Lee Steven Schwartzberg ◽  
Lawrence E. Garbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Staining Intensity ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Independent Review ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

7502 Background: SELECT investigated whether the addition of C to standard chemotherapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with recurrent or progressive NSCLC after failure of platinum-based therapy. Methods: SELECT was a multicenter, open label, randomized phase III trial. Per investigator choice, pts received either P (500 mg/m2) or D (75 mg/m2) on day 1 and then were randomized within each group to chemotherapy plus C (400/250 mg/m2) (initial/weekly) or chemotherapy alone. Therapy was given for up to six 3-week cycles; pts randomized to C continued weekly monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was PFS for PC vs. P as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by IRC, and safety. Preplanned subgroup analyses for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) staining intensity by immunohistochemistry and histology were performed. Results for PC vs. P only are presented. Results: Between Jan 2005 and Feb 2010, 938 total pts were randomized. Baseline demographics were comparable between PC (n=301) and P (n=304): median age 64 years; male 60%; Caucasian 88%; KPS 80-100/60-70 84%/16%; squamous/non-squamous 24%/76%. Median PFS (months) PC: 2.89 and P: 2.76 (hazard ratio [HR] =1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.87-1.21]; p=0.76). Median OS (months) PC: 6.93 and P: 7.79 (HR=1.01 [95% CI=0.86-1.20]; p=0.86). ORR PC: 6.6% and P: 4.3% (odds ratio =1.59 [95% CI=0.78-3.26]; p=0.20). Median DOR (months) PC: 4.17 and P: 6.93 (HR=1.58 [95% CI=0.74-3.36]; p=0.24). There were no statistical differences in efficacy based on histology or EGFR staining intensity. More drug-related AEs/SAEs were observed in the PC arm, with differences mainly attributable to skin toxicities, GI (diarrhea/stomatitis), and hypomagnesemia. Conclusions: The addition of C to P did not improve efficacy in this pt population. Further biomarker analyses are planned. The safety profiles for C and P were consistent with existing data and no new safety signals were observed.

Safety and efficacy of panitumumab (pmab) in HPV-positive (+) and HPV-negative (-) recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN): Analysis of the global phase III SPECTRUM trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5504-5504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Stoehlmacher-Williams ◽  
Cristian Villanueva ◽  
Paolo Foa ◽  
Sylvie Rottey ◽  
Eric Winquist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Geographic Region ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Background Spectrum ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Hpv Status

5504^ Background: SPECTRUM evaluated the safety and efficacy of pmab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, with platinum‑based chemotherapy (CT) vs CT alone in patients (pts) with R/M SCCHN. This predefined analysis presents outcomes by tumor HPV status. Methods: All tumor samples were centrally reviewed. HPV status was determined using a validated immunohistochemistry assay to p16INK4A by an independent lab blinded to treatment assignments. Tumor samples were scored positive or negative according to prespecified criteria. Results: Of 657 enrolled pts (ITT), 443 (67%) had samples evaluable for HPV testing. Ninety‑nine (22%) tumors were HPV+ and 344 (78%) were HPV-. HPV+ rates varied by site (37% oropharynx, 19% larynx, 15% oral cavity, and 13% hypopharynx) and geographic region (44% N America, 22% W Europe, 21% Asia Pacific, 19% S America, and 18% E Europe). Demographics were generally balanced except pts with HPV+ vs HPV- tumors were more often non‑smokers (31% vs 14%), had oropharyngeal tumors (47% vs 23%), and had poorly differentiated tumors (30% vs 13%). Efficacy results are shown (Table). Adverse events were generally balanced between HPV+ and HPV- pts. Conclusions: Pts with HPV- R/M SCCHN administered pmab + CT had improved overall survival (OS) and progression‑free survival (PFS), whereas no improvement in OS or PFS was observed in pts with HPV+ tumors. [Table: see text]

Panitumumab antitumor activity in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) expressing ≥ 10% epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3548-3548 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Berlin ◽  
M. Neubauer ◽  
P. Swanson ◽  
W. G. Harker ◽  
H. Burris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Tumor Expression

3548 Background: Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against EGFr. We investigated panitumumab antitumor activity in pts who failed prior therapy and had EGFr tumor expression levels ≥ 10%. Methods: In this multicenter, phase 2 study of 300 planned pts, pts had documentation of disease progression (PD) during or following adequate doses of fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (centrally confirmed refractory disease [CCRD]), 2–3 prior regimens, ECOG score 0–2, and EGFr staining (by IHC) in ≥ 10% of evaluable tumor cells. Pts received panitumumab at 6 mg/kg Q2W until PD. Tumor assessments (modified WHO, blinded central review) were taken periodically from wk 8–48 until PD. Study endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) at wk 16 (+ ≥ 4 wk confirmation; primary) and ORR throughout study, response duration, progression-free survival (PFS) time, survival time, and safety (secondary). Results: In this interim analysis (5/05), 91 enrolled pts received ≥ 1 dose of panitumumab (safety set); 39 had ≥ 20 wks before the cutoff and CCRD (efficacy set). The efficacy set consisted of 23M/16W, mean (SD) age of 58.6 (10.1) years, 82% white, 95% ECOG ≤ 1, 74% colon cancer and 26% rectal cancer; all had ≥ 2 prior regimens (equivalent characteristics for safety set). At wk 16, 3 (8%) had a partial response, 8 (21%) had stable disease, and 19 (49%) had PD as best OR (9 not done/unevaluable). At the time of this interim analysis, response durations were 12.4, 13.2, and 14.0 wks. In the safety set, 96% had at least 1 treatment-related adverse event (24% grade [gr] 3, 1% gr 4, 1% gr 5). Integument and eye toxicities were: 96% skin, 30% nail, 8% eye, 5% hair, and 7% chelitis. 25 (27%) had diarrhea (3 gr 3); 11 (12%) had hypomagnesemia (3 gr 3/4). One pt had a gr 3 hypersensitivity reaction considered related to panitumumab, received medication, and the event resolved; this pt continued treatment with premedication; no further reactions occurred. In 66 pts with both a baseline and postdose sample, no human anti-human antibodies to panitumumab were detected.Additional data will be presented. Conclusions: Panitumumab has antitumor activity and is well tolerated in pts with EGFr tumor expression levels ≥ 10% who failed standard chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

Olaratumab plus anthracyline in advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: Data of real-world utilization in Austria.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22550-e22550
Author(s):  
Florian Kocher ◽  
Andreas Seeber ◽  
Lukas Weiss ◽  
Franz Romeder ◽  
Joanna Szkandera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Third Line

e22550 Background: Olaratumab is a humanized monoclonal anti platelet-derived growth factor receptor α antibody that has been approved in combination with doxorubicin for the treatment of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical efficacy in STS patients treated with olaratumab in a real-world setting in Austria. Methods: Retrospectively collected, longitudinal data from patients treated between November 2016 and September 2018 at 9 Austrian centers were obtained from respective medical charts. Eligible patients were all patients who received at least one dose of olaratumab. Parameters of most interest collected were response rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Altogether 55 patients were included into analysis. Median age was 58 years. In total, 65.5% (n = 36), 21.8% (n = 12) and 12.7% (n = 7) received olaratumab as first-, second- or ≥ third-line treatment, respectively. Olaratumab was administered either in combination with doxorubicin (81.8%, n = 45) or liposomal doxorubicin (16.4%, n = 9); 1 patient received olaratumab as upfront monotherapy. Median PFS and OS were 2.6 and 11.4 months. The objective response rate was 11.4 % and the disease control rate was 40.9 %. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis outcome was less pronounced compared to the results of the Phase Ib/II approval trial ( Tap WD et al. Lancet 2016). Thus, the results of the ongoing phase III trial (NCT02451943) are urgently needed to confirm the efficacy of the combination of olaratumab and doxorubicin in STS patients.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI Therapy for EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Five Prospective Clinical Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Sun ◽  
Yi-Jia Guo ◽  
Jun Song ◽  
Yan-Ru Wang ◽  
Shu-Ling Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Egfr Tki

PurposeThe role of neoadjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeted therapy for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been clarified. A pooled analysis of prospective clinical trials was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI therapy.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as meeting abstracts were searched for prospective clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI for treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. The main outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), downstaging rate, surgical resection rate (SRR), pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.ResultsA total of five, phase II, prospective, clinical trials involving 124 patients with resectable or potentially resectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant erlotinib or gefitinib treatment were included in this pooled analysis. The median neoadjuvant medication time was 42 (range, 21–56) days and the median time of response evaluation was 45 (range, 42–56) days. The pooled ORR was 58.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 45.5%–71.8%] and the surgical resection and complete resection (R0) rates were 79.9% (95% CI, 65.3%–94.5%) and 64.3% (95% CI, 43.8%–84.8%), respectively. In the stage IIIA subgroup (n = 68), the pooled ORR, SRR, and R0 rate were 51.4%, 72.9%, and 57.0%, respectively, while the downstaging and pCR rates were 14.0% and 0.0%, respectively. The pooled median PFS and overall survival were 13.2 and 41.9 months, respectively. Of the most common grade 3/4 adverse events in the overall group, the incidences of hepatotoxicity and skin rash were 5.3% and 14.7%, respectively. The most commonly reported postoperative complications were lung infection, arrhythmia, and pneumothorax.ConclusionNeoadjuvant EGFR-TKI therapy provides a feasible treatment modality for patients with resectable or potentially resectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC, with satisfactory surgical outcomes and low toxicity. Although further phase III clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings, it is necessary to explore the feasibility of a more effective EGFR-TKI combination neoadjuvant therapy given the modest downgrade and pCR rates for EGFR-TKI alone.

Safety of panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr), in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) across clinical trials

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4138-4138 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Peeters ◽  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
J. Berlin ◽  
J. R. Hecht ◽  
R. Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Infusion Reactions ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Age Range

4138 Background: Panitumumab is indicated in pts with EGFr-expressing mCRC refractory to chemotherapy. We present a summary of safety with panitumumab monotherapy in mCRC pts across 10 clinical trials. Methods: Data were pooled from pts enrolled in 10 clinical trials (including 2 extension studies). Pts received at least 1 dose of panitumumab at 2.5 mg/kg QW, 6 mg/kg Q2W, or 9 mg/kg Q3W. Adverse events were graded using NCI-CTC or CTCAE criteria. Results: A total of 920 mCRC pts were included in this analysis: 60% were male; 88% were white; median age (range) was 61 (20, 88) years. All pts had prior therapy; 77% had failed prior fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and/or oxaliplatin. Most (80%) pts received panitumumab 6 mg/kg Q2W; 17% and 3% of pts received panitumumab 2.5 mg/kg QW and 9 mg/kg Q3W, respectively. Median (range) follow-up time was 21 (1–124) weeks. A total of 7264 panitumumab infusions were administered with a median (range) of 5 (1–94) infusions/pt. Treatment-related adverse events (AE) were experienced by 94% (grade = 3, 20%) of pts. All pts had = 1 AE. The most common AEs were skin-related and GI toxicities ( table ). Skin-related AEs resulted in discontinuation in 2% of pts. Overall, 12% of pts discontinued panitumumab due to toxicity. Four (0.4%) pts had grade = 3 infusion reactions. In pts with postdose samples (n = 613), increased and persistent postdose levels of anti-panitumumab antibodies were detected in 0.5% of pts by ELISA and in 4.6% of pts by Biacore assay. Conclusions: Skin toxicity was common, but rarely treatment-limiting. Most AEs were mild to moderate and infrequently resulted in discontinuation. Infusion reactions and formation of anti-panitumumab antibodies were rare. The safety profile of 9 mg/kg Q3W panitumumab appeared consistent with other dosages; however, because of the small pt size further evaluation is needed. Panitumumab at 2.5 mg/kg QW and 6 mg/kg Q2W was well tolerated across 10 clinical studies. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Final skin toxicity (ST) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) results from PRIME: A randomized phase III study of panitumumab (pmab) plus FOLFOX4 (CT) for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 531-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Yves Douillard ◽  
Salvatore Siena ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Ronald L. Burkes ◽  
Mario Edmundo Barugel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Patient Reported

531^ Background: Final PRIME results showed that pmab + CT significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate vs CT alone for first-line wild type (WT) KRAS mCRC. Efficacy and PRO by ST severity from the final descriptive analysis of PRIME are presented. Methods: Patients (pts) had no prior chemotherapy for mCRC, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, and tumor tissue available for biomarker testing. The final analysis occurred 30 months after the last pt was enrolled; the primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included OS, objective response, and safety. Pts who received treatment and were alive without progression at day 28 were included in the ST analysis. Results: 1183 pts were randomized. 1057 pts with WT or MT KRAS mCRC met the criteria for inclusion in the ST analysis. Maximum grade ST was observed by day 28 in > 50% of pts. Results are shown ( table ). Overall differences in change from baseline of the least square means from a mixed effects model of the EQ-5D Overall Health Rating for pmab + CT (n = 285) minus CT alone (n = 294) and for ST gr 0-1 (n = 53) minus ST gr 2-4 (n = 232) were −1.069 (95% CI: −3.6277 to 1.4896) and 0.8971 (95% CI: ‐4.0224 to 5.8167), respectively. The overall safety profile was broadly comparable across ST groups and treatment arms. Conclusions: Pts with WT KRAS mCRC receiving pmab with ST gr 2-4 had longer PFS and OS vs pts receiving CT alone. PRO were not adversely affected by ST severity. [Table: see text]

CNS response to osimertinib in patients (pts) with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC: Data from a randomized phase III trial (AURA3).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9005-9005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Mok ◽  
Myung-Ju Ahn ◽  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Jin Hyoung Kang ◽  
Nobuyuki Katakami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Brain Scan ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Cns Penetration

9005 Background: CNS metastases (mets) are common in pts with advanced NSCLC. Preclinical studies have shown CNS penetration of osimertinib, and clinical data from a pooled analysis of 2 Phase II trials (AURA extension: NCT01802632, AURA2: NCT02094261) showed activity in the CNS. We report the first evidence of osimertinib efficacy in CNS mets from a randomized Phase III study (AURA3; NCT02151981) in pts with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC who have progressed on or after prior EGFR-TKI therapy. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to osimertinib 80 mg once daily or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy every 3 wks for up to 6 cycles; maintenance pemetrexed was allowed. Pts with stable, asymptomatic CNS mets were eligible for enrolment. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted in pts with CNS mets present on baseline brain scan, as assessed by blinded independent central neuroradiology review (BICR), to define CNS objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR) and progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1. The CNS full analysis set (cFAS) included pts with ≥1 measurable and/or non-measurable CNS mets present on baseline brain scan by BICR; the CNS evaluable for response set (cEFR) included only pts with ≥1 measurable CNS mets. Results: As of 15 April 2016, 116/419 (28%) pts were included in the cFAS. In the cEFR (n = 46), CNS ORR was 70% (21/30; 95% CI 51, 85) with osimertinib and 31% (5/16; 95% CI 11, 59) with chemotherapy (OR, 5.13; 95% CI 1.44, 20.64; p = 0.015). In the cFAS, CNS ORR was 40% (30/75; 95% CI 29, 52) with osimertinib and 17% (7/41; 95% CI 7, 32) with chemotherapy (OR, 3.24; 95% CI 1.33, 8.81; p = 0.014). In the cEFR and cFAS, median CNS DoR was 8.9 months (m) (95% CI 4.3, NC and 4.3, NC) for osimertinib and 5.7 m (95% CI NC, NC and 4.4, 5.7; respectively) for chemotherapy. Median CNS PFS in the cFAS was significantly longer with osimertinib than with chemotherapy (11.7 vs 5.6 m; HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15, 0.69; p = 0.004). Conclusions: Consistent with the overall response to osimertinib reported in pts with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC, osimertinib was superior to chemotherapy in the treatment of pts with CNS mets; CNS response rate was higher, responses were more durable and CNS PFS was longer. Clinical trial information: NCT02151981.

scholarly journals Chemotherapy With or Without Anti-EGFR Agents in Left- and Right-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 805-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-Xian Wang ◽  
Hao-Xiang Wu ◽  
Ming-Ming He ◽  
Ying-Nan Wang ◽  
Hui-Yan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Meta Analyses

AbstractBackground: Previous meta-analyses have suggested primary tumor location as a predictive factor for efficacy of anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the recent phase III TAILOR trial addressing this issue was not included in those analyses. This meta-analysis incorporated data from the TAILOR trial to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR agents (cetuximab [Cet] or panitumumab [Pani]) versus chemotherapy alone for RAS wild-type (wt) right- and left-sided mCRC. Patients and Methods: A PubMed-based literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the additional efficacy of Cet/Pani in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in RAS wt left- and right-sided mCRC. Study-level pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) were performed. Results: Three first-line RCTs (CRYSTAL, PRIME, and TAILOR) and one second-line RCT (20050181) were included. Significant OS benefits from Cet/Pani were observed in the left-sided (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66–0.86) but not right-sided subgroups (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.78–1.27). However, the addition of Cet/Pani to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS and ORR in both the left-sided (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57–0.86, and OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.95–5.51, respectively) and right-sided subgroups (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.99, and OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.08–2.93, respectively). Conclusions: The addition of Cet/Pani to chemotherapy significantly benefits PFS and ORR in patients with RAS wt right-sided mCRC, indicating that anti-EGFR therapies may remain an option for selected patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document