Use of circulating endothelial cells to predict response to FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 427-427
Author(s):  
S. Matsusaka ◽  
N. Mizunuma ◽  
M. Suenaga ◽  
K. Chin ◽  
E. Shinozaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
The Government

427 Background: The purpose of this study was to identify CEC threshold proposal for determining response to FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: All patients were enrolled using institutional review board-approved protocols at the Cancer Institute Hospital and provided informed consent. From July 2007 to June 2008, 33 patients treated with FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab were enrolled in a prospective study. From January 2007 to June 2007, before bevacizumab was approved by the government in Japan, 31 patients treated with FOLFOX4 as a control were enrolled. The study population consisted of patients aged 18 years or older with histologically proven mCRC. Other inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ function. CECs of whole blood at the baseline, day 4, 2 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy were isolated and counted using immunomagnetics. Results: There was no correlation between CEC levels and the outcome in the FOLFOX4. In the FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab, CEC levels at the baseline were significantly associated with the outcome. Patients with 65 or more CECs at the baseline had shorter median PFS (9.2 months), than the median PFS of fewer than 65 CECs at the baseline (18.9 months) in the FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab (p = 0.003). Patients with 65 or more CECs at the baseline had shorter median OS (23.3 months), than the median OS of fewer than 65 CEC s at the baseline in the FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab (p = 0.027). In the univariate analysis, lung metastasis, lymph node metastasis, and CEC levels at the baseline predicted PFS. In the univariate Cox regression analyses, peritoneal metastasis, CEC levels at the baseline were associated with OS. In order to evaluate the independent predictive effect of FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab, multivariate Cox regression analysis was carried out. CEC levels at the baseline were the strongest predictor. Conclusions: A threshold of lower than 65 CEC/4mL at the baseline was a significant predictor of the outcome for colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Use of circulating tumor cells to predict response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
S. Matsusaka ◽  
K. Chin ◽  
N. Mizunuma ◽  
M. Ogura ◽  
M. Suenaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy

43 Background: The purpose of this study was to quantify circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients, and to demonstrate the role of CTCs in cancer therapy. The purpose of this study was to identify CTC threshold proposal for determining response to chemotherapy in AGC. Methods: From November 2007 to June 2009, fifty-two patients with AGC were enrolled into a prospective study. All patients were enrolled using institutional review board-approved protocols at the Cancer Institute Hospital and provided informed consent. The study population consisted of patients of aged 18 years or older with histologically proven AGC. Other inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 2; adequate organ function. The subjects were five patients treated with S-1 (40 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-28, repeated every 6 weeks), twenty-six patients treated with S-1 plus CDDP (S-1 40 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-21, CDDP 60 mg/m2, day 8, repeated every 5 weeks), and twenty-one patients treated with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2, weekly). CTCs of whole blood at baseline, two weeks and four weeks after initiation of chemotherapy, were isolated and enumerated using immunomagnetics. Results: Patients with ≥4 CTCs at two-week points and four-week points had a shorter median PFS (1.4, 1.4 months, respectively), than those with the median PFS of <4 CTCs (4.9, 5.0 months, respectively) (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). Patients with ≥4 CTCs at two-week points and four-week points had shorter median OS (3.5, 4.0 months, respectively) than those with the median PFS of <4 CTCs (11.7, 11.4 months, respectively) (p<0.001, p=0.001, respectively). In univariate analysis, PS, treatment regimen, Line of chemotherapy, and CTC levels at 2 weeks and 4 weeks predicted PFS and OS. In order to evaluate the independent predictive effect of chemotherapy, multivariate Cox regression analysis was carried out. CTC levels at 2 weeks and 4 weeks were the strongest predictors. Conclusions: A threshold of lower than 4 CTC/7.5 ml at 2 weeks and 4 weeks was a significant predictor of the outcome for AGC patients treated with S-1 based regimen or paclitaxel regimen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Peritoneum metastasis (PM) as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3051-3051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiya Narita ◽  
Keiji Sugiyama ◽  
Seiichiro Mitani ◽  
Kazunori Honda ◽  
Toshiki Masuishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Line Therapy

3051 Background: Anti-PD-1 monotherapy has proven effective for the patients (pts) with MGC. However, the identification of biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes remain as critical needs. We aimed to identify baseline characteristics associated with time to treatment failure (TTF) or overall survival (OS) for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy as second- or later-line therapy in MGC. Methods: Routine blood count parameters and clinical characteristics at baseline were retrospectively investigated in 31 pts with MGC in Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. Endpoints were TTF and OS following anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Kaplan-Meiyer and Cox regression analysis were applied for survival analyses. Results: Patient characteristics were as follows: median age (range), 68 (47–83); ECOG performance status (PS) 0/1, 21/10; PM +ve/-ve, 12/19; No. of metastatic sites 1–2/≥3, 18/13; No. of prior chemotherapy regimens 1–2/≥3, 11/20; and absolute eosinophil count (AEC) <150/≥150 /μl, 14/17. Objective response rate and disease control rate (RECIST ver. 1.1) were 26% vs. 0% (odds ratio [OR], 3.76; P = 0.12) and 79% vs. 50% (OR, 3.58; P = 0.12) in the PM -ve group (Cohort A) and the PM +ve group (Cohort B), respectively. On univariate analysis, the pts with poor PS, PM +ve, and high AEC were significantly poor TTF; and poor PS and PM +ve were significantly identified as prognostic factors of poor OS. On multivariate analysis, only PM +ve was independent negative impact not only for TTF but also for OS. Median TTF and OS were 5.4 vs. 1.3 months (M) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 4.29; 95%CI, 1.60–11.5; P < 0.01) and 28.2 vs. 7.5 M (adjusted HR, 3.68; 95%CI, 1.25–10.8; P = 0.02) in Cohort A and Cohort B. Six-months TTF probabilities of 42% vs. 0% ( P = 0.03) and one-year OS probabilities of 58% vs. 8% ( P< 0.01) were observed in Cohort A compared to in Cohort B. Conclusions: PM -ve in the pts treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was associated with better efficacy. In the pts with PM -ve, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy could be adapted in first-line therapy. [Table: see text]

The prognostic value of serum IL-6 and YKL-40 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15060-e15060
Author(s):  
Benny Vittrup Jensen ◽  
Mathias Holsey Gramkow ◽  
Camilla Stedstrup Mosgaard ◽  
Christian Dehlendorff ◽  
Per Pfeiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
L 14

e15060 Background: The prognostic value of serum IL-6, YKL-40 and CEA before first (1) and third line therapy (3LT) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is lacking and was evaluated in this study. Methods: From 2004 to 2015 serum samples were collected from 160 and 255 patients with mCRC before 1LT and 3LT, respectively. Median age was 64 years (range 33-87) and male/female ratio 243(59%)/172(41%). Serum IL-6 (R&D, UK) and YKL-40 (Quidel, USA) were determined by ELISA. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated with Cox regression analysis. CEA, IL-6 and YKL-40 were included as log2-transformed continuous variables with mutual adjustment between CEA, IL-6 and YKL-40, primary tumor location, sex and age. Results: In 3LT IL-6, YKL-40 and CEA levels were higher (P < 0.001) than in 1LT (IL-6: 9.5 pg/ml [IQR4.2-18.5] vs. 4.6 [2.5-10.5]; YKL-40: 140 ng/ml [77-272] vs. 101 [62-172]; and CEA: 59 ug/l [14-288] vs. 23[5.8-153]). In 3LT univariate analysis showed that increased levels of IL-6, YKL-40 and CEA were associated with shorter PFS (IL-6: HR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.31, P < 0.01; YKL-40: HR = 1.13, 1.04-1.24, P = 0.01; CEA: HR = 1.05, 1.00-1.09, P = 0.04). In 1LT only high IL-6 was associated with shorter PFS (HR = 1.09, 1.01-1.17, P = 0.03). In a multivariate analysis only high IL-6 was significantly associated with shorter PFS in 3LT (HR = 1.15, 1.03-1.29, P < 0.01) and none of the biomarkers in 1LT. In 3LT univariate analysis showed that increased levels of all 3 biomarkers were associated with a shorter OS (IL-6: HR = 1.36, 1.23-1.51, P < 0.01; YKL-40: HR = 1.21, 1.10-1.33, P < 0.01; CEA: HR = 1.11, 1.06-1.16, P < 0.01). In 1LT high levels of IL-6 (HR = 1.17, 1.08-1.27, P < 0.01) and YKL-40 (HR = 1.18, 1.00-1.38, P = 0.05), but not CEA, were associated with short OS. In 3LT the multivariate analysis showed that both higher IL-6 (HR = 1.34, 1.20-1.50, P < 0.01) and CEA (HR = 1.09, 1.03-1.14, P < 0.01), but not YKL-40 were significantly associated with a shorter OS. In 1LT only higher IL-6 was associated with a shorter OS (HR = 1.19, 1.08-1.31, P < 0.01) Conclusions: Serum IL-6 and YKL-40 may be useful prognostic biomarkers in combination with CEA in patients with mCRC

Impact of nail toxicity on survival of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) treated with docetaxel

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16122-e16122 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Scotte ◽  
E. Banu ◽  
J. Medioni ◽  
M. Boudraoui ◽  
J. M. Tourani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Oral Prednisone ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Nail Changes ◽  
Hormone Refractory ◽  
The Impact

e16122 Background: Docetaxel is the standard first-line treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic HRPC. Taxanes are a well known cause of nail toxicity but docetaxel-related nail toxicity is rarely explored. Methods: Eligible HRPC pts included in the current analysis were from a phase II, multicentre, case-control study (Scotte F et al, J Clin Oncol 2005). Pts were treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and oral prednisone 10 mg daily. Nail toxicity was graded according to NCI CTC version 2 (0: absence of toxicity; 1: minor changes; 2: onycholisis). The endpoint of interest was the impact of nail toxicity on overall survival (OS) using Cox regression analysis as the main statistical method. OS was the time from the start of chemotherapy to death or last follow-up. Results: Data from 23 HRPC pts treated in two French centres were analyzed. The median age was 68 years, 91% of pts had bone metastases, 84% had a single metastatic site, 49% had a Gleason score of ≥ 8 and 91% had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. Median OS was 16.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.7–27.6 months], all pts died. There were differences in OS between nail toxicity categories (see Table). Median OS was 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.5–11.7) and 22.7 months (95% CI, 15.1–30.3) for pts without and with nail changes, respectively. Nail changes severity was significantly related to OS: hazard ratio (HR)=0.50 (95% CI, 0.28–0.92), P=0.027 (univariate analysis). The multivariate analysis adjusted by ECOG PS (the second covariate associated with prognosis) showed a 63% reduction in the risk of death for pts with nail toxicities: HR=0.29 (95% CI, 0.09–0.82), P=0.049. Conclusions: Our results suggest that pts with docetaxel-related nail toxicity have a better OS than those with no nail toxicity. This demonstrates that nail changes in HRPC pts treated with docetaxel are predictive of OS; these findings should be validated in a large cohort of pts. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Hospitalizations and Clinical Outcome in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer During Regorafenib or TAS-102 Therapy

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2812
Author(s):  
Florian Huemer ◽  
Gudrun Piringer ◽  
Verena Schlintl ◽  
Hubert Hackl ◽  
Gabriel Rinnerthaler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Therapy ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
The Impact

Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines recommend regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) for the third-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this analysis, we evaluated hospitalizations during regorafenib or TAS-102 treatment and the impact of hospitalizations on overall survival (OS). This retrospective analysis was based on unselected, consecutive mCRC patients treated with regorafenib and/or TAS-102 at the tertiary cancer centers in Salzburg and Wels-Grieskirchen, Austria. Between January 2013 and May 2019, 93 patients started third- or fourth-line therapy with regorafenib or TAS-102. Tumor therapy (regorafenib versus TAS-102, HR: 1.95 [95% CI: 1.07–3.54], p = 0.03) and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (2–3 versus 0–1, HR: 4.04 [95% CI: 2.11–7.71], p < 0.001) showed a statistically significant association with hospitalization risk in multivariate analysis. The corresponding hospitalization probability from initiation of third- or fourth-line was 30% with regorafenib versus 18% with TAS-102 at five weeks and 41% versus 28% at ten weeks, respectively. Hospitalizations irrespective of cause during regorafenib or TAS-102 therapy did neither impact median survival in patients undergoing only third-line therapy (never-hospitalized: 5.7 months [95% CI: 3.9–10.5] versus hospitalized: 5.4 months [95% CI: 2.8–9.6], p = 0.45), nor in patients receiving third- and fourth-line therapy (12.2 months [95% CI: 10.6–28.8] versus 18.6 months [95% CI: 6.3-not reached], p = 0.90). In conclusion, apart from poor ECOG performance status, regorafenib therapy was associated with an increased hospitalization probability during palliative systemic third- and fourth-line therapy in mCRC. However, hospitalizations during regorafenib or TAS-102 therapy did not impact OS beyond second-line therapy.

Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71
Author(s):  
Azim Jalali ◽  
Hui-Li Wong ◽  
Rachel Wong ◽  
Margaret Lee ◽  
Lucy Gately ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Number Of Patients

71 Background: For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. In Australia, TAS-102 was initially made available locally through patients self-funding, later via an industry sponsored Medicine Access Program (MAP) and then via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in real world Australian population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to all TRACC patients and those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Results: Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102 (non-PBS n = 27, PBS n = 80), The median number of patients per site was 7 (range: 1-17). The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 67 for all TRACC patients and 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102 and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 39% vs 49% were RAS wild type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median clinician assessed progression-free survival was 3.3 compared to RECIST defined PFS of 2 months in RECOURSE study, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths in the real-world series, where TAS102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion. In the RECOURSE study there was a 4% febrile neutropenia rate and one treatment-related death. Conclusions: TRACC registry patients treated with TAS102 were younger than both TRACC patients overall and those from the RECOURSE trial. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS. However overall survival outcomes achieved with TAS102 in real world patients were comparable to findings from this pivotal trial with an acceptable rate of major adverse events.

scholarly journals Phase Ib/II trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and immunological activity of durvalumab (MEDI4736) (anti-PD-L1) plus tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) combined with FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

ESMO Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e000375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-David Fumet ◽  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
Alice Hervieu ◽  
Sylvie Zanetta ◽  
Jean-Florian Guion ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mutational Status

Background5-Fluorouracil plus irinotecan or oxaliplatin alone or in association with target therapy are standard first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1 demonstrated efficacy on mCRC with microsatellite instability but remain ineffective alone in microsatellite stable tumour. 5-Fluorouracil and oxaliplatin were known to present immunogenic properties. Durvalumab (D) is a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that inhibits binding of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to its receptor. Tremelimumab (T) is a mAb directed against the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). This study is designed to evaluate whether the addition of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibition to oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX) increases treatment efficacy.MethodsThis phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03202758) will assess the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX/D/T association in patients with mCRC (n=48). Good performance status patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group <2) with untreated, RAS mutational status mCRC will be eligible. Prior adjuvant therapy is allowed provided recurrence is >6 months postcompletion. There is a safety lead in nine patients receiving FOLFOX/D/T. Assuming no safety concerns the study will go on to include 39 additional patients. Patients will receive folinic acid (400 mg/m²)/5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m² as bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 as a 46-hour infusion)/oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) every 14 days with D (750 mg) D1 every 14 days and T (75 mg) D1 every 28 days. After six cycles of FOLFOX only D/T will continue until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, or patient/investigator decision to stop. Primary endpoint is safety and efficacy according to progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints include overall response rate and quality of life. Hypothesis is that a PFS of 50% at 6 months is insufficient and a PFS of 70.7% is expected (with α=10%, β=10%). Blood, plasma and tumour tissue will be collected and assessed for potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

scholarly journals Beneficial Treatment Management with Trifluridine/Tipiracil in a Patient with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Pronounced Hematological Event History during Previous Treatments

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Kaechele ◽  
Jürgen Hess ◽  
Wolfgang Schneider-Kappus
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
History Of ◽  
Grade 3

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) significantly improves overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The most common treatment-related event (grade ≥3) was hematological toxicity. We here report long-term disease-stabilizing FTD/TPI treatment of an mCRC patient (KRAS wild-type, ECOG performance status 1 at baseline and at the end of FTD/TPI therapy) with multifocal synchronous metastases and a longstanding history of extensive hematological events during previous treatments. Finally, this 62-year-old male patient was treated for 10 months with FTD/TPI by consecutive alteration of treatment parameters: (i) initial daily dose reduction to 80 mg (72% of the recommended dose), (ii) 20 days dose delay, (iii) a second and later third dose reduction to 70 mg and 60 mg (about 64% and 55%, respectively, of the recommended dose), and (iv) 30 µg per day of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration first for 3 days, and later for 5 days, for each treatment cycle.

Regorafenib (REG) versus trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) as salvage-line in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies (REGOTAS): A propensity score analysis from a JSCCR multicenter observational study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3540-3540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shota Fukuoka ◽  
Toshikazu Moriwaki ◽  
Hiroya Taniguchi ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Yosuke Kumekawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study

3540 Background: It is unclear which drug of REG or TAS-102 should be used earlier for the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have access to both drugs. This study investigated the comparison of the efficacy between REG and TAS-102 in patients with refractory to standard chemotherapies. Methods: The clinical data of patients who were treated with REG or TAS-102 among these drugs naive mCRC patients between Jun 2014 and Sep 2015 were retrospectively delivered from 24 institutions of Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Propensity score (PS) was calculated with a logistic regression, in which using baseline parameters were included. Two methods, adjusted and matched analysis, to take propensity score were used. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models based on PS adjustment and matching. Results: Total of 589 patients were enrolled and 550 patients (223 patients in the REG group and 327 patients in the TAS-102 group) met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The results from PS adjusted analyses showed that OS was similar between the two groups (HR of TAS-102 to REG, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.18). There were also no statistically significant differences between two groups for progression-free survival (HR 0.94) and time to ECOG Performance status≥2 (HR 1.00), expect for time to treatment failure (HR 0.81; P = 0.025). In the subgroup analysis, REG showed favorable survival compared with TAS-102 in the age of < 65 years patients and unfavorable survival in ≥65 years patients (P for interaction = 0.012). In the PS matched sample (174 patients in each group), the clinical outcomes were similar to the results of the PS adjusted analysis. Conclusions: Although REG and TAS-102 showed a similar efficacy in mCRC patients with refractory to standard chemotherapies, the choice of the drug by age might affect the survival. Supported by JSCCR. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020416

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document