Multicenter prospective phase II study of sunitinib in non-clear cell type renal cell carcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 325-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lee ◽  
J. Ahn ◽  
H. Lim ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
T. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Steroid Dependence ◽  
Chromophobe Rcc ◽  
Clear Cell Rcc

325 Background: Sunitinib has been shown to produce a high response rate (RR), and improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with clear cell RCC. Retrospective data suggest sunitinib may be effective in papillary and chromophobe RCC. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial of sunitinib in non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC). Methods: Eligibility criteria included PS 0-1, measurable disease, and adequate organ function. Pts with brain metastases were not excluded if controlled without steroid dependence. Response assessment was performed every 6 weeks. Primary endpoint was RR. Secondary endpoints were TTP, safety and OS. Results: Between 6/2008 and 7/2010, 29 pts with nccRCC were enrolled (total accrual 35: P0=5%, P1=20%, alpha=0.05, beta=0.2, drop-out rate 15%). Median age was 52 (18–76). Twenty-four pts (84%) had prior nephrectomy. Seven pts (24%) had poor risk and 13 (45%) had intermediate risk disease by MSKCC criteria. Twenty-one pts had papillary RCC (type II in 11 and type not- specified in 10), and 4 patients had chromophobe RCC. Two pts discontinued protocol treatment due to toxicity prior to completion of cycle 1 (one pt had cardiogenic shock 27 days after start of therapy and the other refused further treatment 5 days after therapy). Eleven pts out of 29 had partial response with a RR of 38% (95% CI, 20.2%–55.6%) and additional 15 patients (52%) had SD with a disease control rate of 90%. Response rates were not significantly different according to the histologic type (43% in papillary type and 25% in chromophobe type). Median duration of response was 12.7 months (95% CI, 2.3∼23.1) and median TTP was 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.5∼8.3). With a median FU duration of 16 months (95% CI, 8.6∼23.4), 10 pts have been dead resulting in an estimated median OS of 17.9 months. Toxicity profiles were commensurate with prior reports on Korean patients (Yoo, et al. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010). However, there was one treatment-related death caused by acute heart failure in patient without relevant risk factors for heart disease. Conclusions: Although our study is ongoing, the primary endpoint has been met and these data suggest that suntinib has promising activity in patients with nccRCC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

MC044h, a phase II trial of sorafenib in patients (pts) with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET): A Phase II Consortium (P2C) study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4504-4504 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Hobday ◽  
J. Rubin ◽  
K. Holen ◽  
J. Picus ◽  
R. Donehower ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

4504 Background: Treatment options for metastatic NET, including islet cell carcinoma (ICC) and carcinoid tumor (CT), are limited. These tumors frequently express vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and platelet derived growth factor receptor receptor-β (PDGFR-β). Sorafenib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 and PDGFR-β tyrosine kinase domains, is a rational targeted therapy to evaluate in NET. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: ECOG PS = 2, = 1 prior chemotherapy, good organ function and signed informed consent. Prior interferon and prior or concurrent octreotide at a stable dose were allowed. Pts unable to take oral medications, with uncontrolled hypertension or with symptomatic coronary artery disease were excluded. Pts received sorafenib 400 mg po BID. Primary endpoint was response by RECIST in two cohorts (ie, CT and ICC) using separate 2-stage phase II designs. Results: 93 pts were enrolled: (50 CT, 43 ICC). For pts evaluable for the primary endpoint, 4 of 41 (10%) CT pts and 4 of 41 (10%) ICC pts had a PR. There were 3 minor responses (MR = 20–29% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters) in CT pts and 9 MRs in ICC pts for PR+MR rate of 17% for CT pts and 32% for ICC pts. For pts evaluable, 6-month progression-free survival was observed in 8/20 CT and 14/23 ICC pts. Grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 43% of pts, with skin (20%), GI (7%) and fatigue (9%) most common. Translational studies from tumor tissue will be presented. Conclusions: Sorafenib at 400 mg po BID has modest activity in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, with frequent grade = 3 toxicity. Supported by NOI CM6225. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized, phase II efficacy assessment of multiple MET kinase inhibitors in metastatic papillary renal carcinoma (PRCC): SWOG S1500.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4599-TPS4599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
Catherine M. Tangen ◽  
Ian Murchie Thompson ◽  
Brian M. Shuch ◽  
Naomi B. Haas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Clear Cell Rcc

TPS4599 Background: PRCC constitutes approximately 15% of RCC cases, and no standard of care exists for metastatic disease. Approved VEGF- and mTOR-directed therapies for clear cell RCC in metastatic PRCC (mPRCC) have generally been ineffective. Trials assessing sunitinib and everolimus in non-clear cell RCC show a numerical advantage in progression-free survival (PFS) with sunitinib therapy. Prospective studies evaluating sunitinib in mPRCC show a broad range of efficacy, with PFS ranging from 1.6-6.6 months. Another possible approach to treating mPRCC is to target the MET protooncogene, which is frequently altered across both type I and type II disease. SWOG 1500 is a randomized, phase II study which will compare sunitinib to three MET-directed therapies in pts with mPRCC. Methods: Eligible pts will have PRCC (type I, type II or NOS), Zubrod performance status 0-1, and measurable metastatic disease. Pts may have received up to 1 prior systemic therapy, with the exception of prior VEGF-directed treatments. Treated brain metastases are allowed. Tissue must be available for central pathologic review of papillary subtype. Pts will receive either oral sunitinib, cabozantinib, crizotinib or savolitinib in a 1:1:1:1 randomization, with stratification by (1) prior therapy (0 vs 1) and (2) PRCC subtype (type I vs type II vs NOS). The primary endpoint of the study is to compare PFS with sunitinib to PFS with MET-directed therapies. Secondary endpoints in the study include comparison of response rate, overall survival and safety profile. Translational aims of the study include correlation of clinical outcome with MET mutation, copy number and other markers of MET signaling. Radiographic assessment will be performed every 12 wks. Interim analyses are planned for each arm. A total of 275 pts will be enrolled, with 26 pts registered as of Jan 30, 2017. Clinical trial information: NCT02761057.

Phase II trial of the CDK4 inhibitor PD0332991 in CDK4-amplified liposarcoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10002-10002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Andrew Dickson ◽  
Mary Louise Keohan ◽  
William D. Tap ◽  
Cristina Antonescu ◽  
Jonathan Landa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Promising Result ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cdk4 Inhibitor

10002 Background: CDK4 is amplified in approximately 90% of well-differentiated/de-differentiated liposarcomas (WD/DDLS). The selective CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor PD0332991 (PD) inhibits growth and induces senescence in liposarcoma cell lines and xenografts. In a phase I trial of PD, several patients with progressive WD/DDLS had prolonged stable disease for several years. To determine the safety and efficacy of PD, a phase II study was performed. Methods: Participants were patients with advanced WD/DDLS. Eligibility criteria were age≥18 years, measurable WD/DDLS (RECIST 1.1), documented progression on at least one systemic therapy directly before enrollment, CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and retinoblastoma protein (RB) expression by immunohistochemistry (≥1+). Pts received oral PD 200mg daily for 14 consecutive days in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks. Based on historical data, a promising result was defined as a 12-week PFS of ≥40% and not promising as ≤20%. The sample size was up to 28 evaluable patients. If 9 patients were progression free at 12 weeks, then PD would be considered to have activity in WD/DDLS. Results: Of 44 patients screened (42/44 CDK4 amplified; 41/44 RB+), 29 were enrolled and 27 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median age was 65 (range 37-83); 52% were male; ECOG scores were 0 (69%) or 1 (31%), and the median number of prior regimens was 1 (range 1-5). PFS at 12 weeks was 70% (19/27 patients; 90% CI 56-100%), and thus the study significantly exceeded its primary endpoint. At the data cutoff, the median PFS was 18 weeks. Seven patients remain on study with stable disease at 18-48 weeks of followup. Grade 3 and 4 events included anemia (grade 3, 14%), thrombocytopenia (grade 3, 17%; grade 4, 14%), neutropenia (grade 3, 41%; grade 4, 7%) and febrile neutropenia (3%). Dose reductions were required in 24% of patients. Conclusions: Among patients with WD/DDLS with CDK4 amplification and RB expression who had actively progressing disease despite prior systemic therapy, treatment with the CDK4 inhibitor PD0332991 was associated with improved PFS. A randomized phase 3 trial is planned.

Phase II trial of the CDK4 inhibitor PD0332991 in patients with advanced CDK4-amplified liposarcoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10512-10512
Author(s):  
Mark Andrew Dickson ◽  
William D. Tap ◽  
Mary Louise Keohan ◽  
Sandra P. D'Angelo ◽  
Mrinal M. Gounder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Promising Result ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3

10512 Background: Approximately 90% of well-differentiated / de-differentiated liposarcomas (WD/DDLS) have CDK4 amplification. The selective CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor PD0332991 inhibits growth and induces senescence in liposarcoma cell lines and xenografts. Our prior phase II study demonstrated that treatment with PD0332991 (200mg daily x 14d every 21d) results in clinical benefit in WD/DDLS but moderate hematologic toxicity (48% Grade 3/4 neutropenia; dose reduction in 24%). Aiming to reduce toxicity, we conducted a phase II study to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity with PD0332991 at a new dose and schedule, 125mg daily x 21d every 28d. Methods: Participants were patients with advanced WD/DDLS. Eligibility criteria were age ≥ 18 years, measurable WD/DDLS (RECIST 1.1), documented progression on at least one systemic therapy directly before enrollment, CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and retinoblastoma protein expression by immunohistochemistry (≥1+). Pts received oral PD0332991 at 125mg daily for 21 days in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS at 12 weeks. Based on historical data, a promising result was defined as a 12-week PFS of ≥40% and not promising as ≤20%. The sample size was up to 28 evaluable patients. If 9 patients were progression free at 12 weeks, then PD0332991 would be considered to have activity in WD/DDLS. Results: 29 pts were enrolled and 25 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median age was 62 (range 42-85); 55% were male; median ECOG score was 0 (range 0-1). PFS at 12 weeks was 56% (14/25 patients; 90% CI 41-100%), and thus the study significantly exceeded its primary endpoint. Median PFS was 23.6 weeks (95% CI: 11.6 to Not Reached). There was 1 confirmed partial response lasting > 1 year. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events included anemia (grade 3, 21%), thrombocytopenia (grade 3, 7%; grade 4, 3%), and neutropenia (grade 3, 34%). Dose reduction was required in only 1 patient. Conclusions: In patients with WD/DDLS with CDK4 amplification, PD0332991 treatment was associated with a favorable PFS and objective tumor response. This dose and schedule appears active and may have less toxicity than 200mg x 14d. The 125mg x 21d schedule warrants evaluation in a phase 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT01209598.

Phase II efficacy trial of pazopanib in nonclear cell metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC): PINCR.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 696-696
Author(s):  
Brian Addis Costello ◽  
Thai Huu Ho ◽  
Gabriela Perez Burbano ◽  
David W. Hillman ◽  
Fernando Quevedo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

696 Background: A number of treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been FDA approved since December, 2005. Trials evaluating these agents excluded non-clear cell histologies and therefore the efficacy of these treatments remains unclear in patients (pts) with metastatic non-clear cell RCC (mncRCC). Methods: This is a single arm Phase II study designed to determine the efficacy of pazopanib in mncRCC. Treatment was pazopanib 800 mg by mouth daily until progression or intolerability of treatment. Dose reductions were allowed for toxicity with dose level -1 being 600 mg daily and dose level -2, 400 mg daily. Cycles were every 28 days. Main eligibility criteria included: (1) age ³ 18 years old; (2) histologic confirmation of ncRCC; (3) ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0, 1, or 2; (4) up to one prior treatment for mncRCC (5) measurable or non-measurable metastatic disease per RECIST criteria. The primary endpoint was overall survival rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were best tumor response rates after two cycles, PFS, OS and toxicity. Results: 38 pts were enrolled between May 16, 2013 and February 1, 2018. 35 pts were evaluable for primary endpoint. Median age 63 years old and 22/35 (62.9%) were male. Most common histology was papillary RCC, 14/35 (40%), and most common number of metastatic sites was 1. 29/35 (82.9%) had prior nephrectomy and 30/35 (85.7%) had no prior systemic therapy. Median number of cycles was 5. 12-month OS was 65.7% (90% CI, 50.5-78.9%). Best response in first 2 cycles: PR 11%, SD 60%, PD 9%, not evaluated 20%. Median PFS was 7.5 months (90% CI, 5.0-11.0); median OS 18.9 months (90% CI, 13.0-NE). Grade 3 / 4 AEs seen in 25 pts with hypertension, transaminitis and abdominal pain being most common (seen in >10%). Conclusions: There are limited data about the efficacy of available therapies for mncRCC. This study shows that pazopanib has similar efficacy compared to historical data in clinical trials using other TKIs in mncRCC. The safety profile of pazopanib in pts with mncRCC was found to be similar to that found in prior clinical trials studying pazopanib. Our findings warrant further investigation into the utility of pazopanib in metastatic ncRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01767636.

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) for advanced large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung: A multicenter phase II study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8037-8037
Author(s):  
Seiji Niho ◽  
Hirotsugu Kenmotsu ◽  
Ikuo Sekine ◽  
Genichiro Ishii ◽  
Yuichi Ishikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Ecog Ps

8037 Background: LCNEC and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are recognized as high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung. A differential diagnosis between LCNEC and SCLC using a tiny biopsy specimen is frequently difficult. Consequently, prospective clinical trials examining chemotherapy for advanced LCNEC have seldom been reported. We conducted a phase II study of combination chemotherapy with IP in patients (pts) with advanced LCNEC. Methods: The eligibility criteria included a chemotherapy-naïve status, a histological diagnosis of advanced LCNEC, an age of 20-75 years, and an ECOG PS of 0-1. Pts received I (60 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15) and P (60 mg/m2, day 1) every 4 weeks for up to 4 cycles. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR). The sample size was determined to be 44, with a one-sided alpha of 0.1, a beta of 0.2, and expected and threshold values for the primary endpoint of 50% and 30%. Results: 44 pts from 11 institutes were enrolled between Jan 2005 and Nov 2011. The median age was 62.5 years; 21 pts had a PS of 0, and 35 pts were male. 5 pts had stage IIIB, 28 had stage IV, and 11 had recurrences after surgical resection. The RR was 54.5% (95% CI, 38.8-69.6). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 24 pts, but only 3 pts experienced febrile neutropenia. Other toxicities were mild and manageable. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.9 months (95%CI, 5.5-6.3), and the median survival time (MST) was 15.1 months (95%CI, 11.2-19.0). Pathological specimens for a pre-planned central review were available for 41 pts. 30 pts were diagnosed as having LCNEC, whereas 10 pts were diagnosed as having SCLC, and 1 patient was diagnosed as having non-SCLC with a neuroendocrine morphology. Subgroup analyses were shown in the Table. Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with IP was active in pts with advanced LCNEC, but the RR and the overall survival period in pts with LCNEC seemed to be inferior to those in pts with SCLC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000004796. [Table: see text]

Denosumab and pembrolizumab in clear cell renal carcinoma (KEYPAD): A phase II trial (ANZUP1601).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS367-TPS367
Author(s):  
Craig Gedye ◽  
Abhishek Jagdish Joshi ◽  
Alison Yan Zhang ◽  
Andrew James Martin ◽  
Anthony M. Joshua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Tumour Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival

TPS367 Background: Inhibitors of the programmed death-1 pathway (PD-1) are effective in clear cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC). Preclinical data and case reports suggest that denosumab, an inhibitor of Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor κ-B Ligand (RANKL) signaling, could potentiate the anti-tumour effects of anti-PD1 inhibitors without overlapping toxicities. We aim to determine the activity and safety of combining denosumab and pembrolizumab in advanced ccRCC. Methods: This single arm, multi-center, phase II trial will recruit 70 participants with metastatic or unresectable ccRCC, progressing during or after treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and with no prior treatment with immunotherapy or denosumab. Participants will receive pembrolizumab 200mg IV every 3 weeks plus denosumab 120mg SC on days 1, 8 and 22 and then every 3 weeks until disease progression, prohibitive toxicity or maximum treatment of 24 months. Response will be assessed at weeks 12, 18, 24, then every 12 weeks until disease progression. Bloods for translational studies are collected at baseline, week 6 and on disease progression. The primary endpoint is objective tumour response rate (OTRR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include OTRR per iRECIST, progression free survival (PFS), time to OTRR, time to first skeletal related event, adverse events, and frequency of treatment delays/discontinuations. Correlative studies will include identification of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers relating to immune and RANKL signaling. A sample size of 70 provides 90% power with a 1-sided type 1 error rate of 10% to distinguish the observed OTRR (and PFS at 6 months) from an OTRR of 40% (worthy of pursuit) versus 25% (not worthy of pursuit). 15 sites are open across Australia. As of September 23, 2020, 40 patients have been recruited. Clinical trial information: NCT03280667 .

Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma(nccRCC): ORACLE study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4580-4580
Author(s):  
Deepak Kilari ◽  
Aniko Szabo ◽  
Pooja Ghatalia ◽  
Tracy L Rose ◽  
Nicole Weise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clear Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
New Combination ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clear Cell Rcc ◽  
Rhabdoid Differentiation

4580 Background: Despite advances in the treatment of clear cell RCC, there is a paucity of data to guide management of nccRCC due to the heterogeneity and rarity of these tumors. The clinical activity of new combination therapies (including immunotherapy (IO), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGF), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors) in metastatic nccRCC is not known. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we explored the efficacy of combination systemic therapies in patients with nccRCC. Baseline and follow-up demographic, clinical, treatment, and radiographic data were collected. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by investigator review. Secondary endpoints include progression- free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), median duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and biomarker correlates. Results: Among 66 included patients, median age was 59 yr; 60% were male and 62% white. Histologies included papillary (38%), chromophobe (17%), unclassified (24%), translocation (12%), and other (9 %). Sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid differentiation was present in 18%, 70% had prior nephrectomy, 86% were IMDC intermediate/poor risk, 29% and 32% had liver and bone metastasis respectively. 67% received combination treatment in the first line. Comparison of outcomes based on treatment regimen is shown in the table. Conclusions: Antitumor activity was observed with novel combinations in nccRCC which warrants further prospective studies. Response rates and survival with combination therapy in this dataset remain inferior to rates seen in clear cell RCC.[Table: see text]

Randomized phase II trial of ficlatuzumab with or without cetuximab in pan-refractory, advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6015-6015
Author(s):  
Julie E. Bauman ◽  
Nabil F. Saba ◽  
Denise Roe ◽  
Jessica R. Bauman ◽  
John M. Kaczmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Platinum Resistance ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Immune Biomarkers ◽  
Hpv Status

6015 Background: Cetuximab (C), an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb), is approved for advanced HNSCC but benefits a minority. Crosstalk between the EGFR and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/cMet pathways is a known resistance mechanism. HGF is also immunosuppressive within the tumor microenvironment. A Phase I study confirmed the safety of C and ficlatuzumab (F), an IgG1 anti-HGF mAb, with preliminary efficacy and biomarker data suggesting that dual pathway inhibition may overcome tumor-intrinsic or immune cetuximab resistance. Methods: The primary objective of this phase II randomized, non-comparative trial was to evaluate the efficacy of F (20 mg/kg every 2 wks), with or without C (500 mg/m2 every 2 wks), in pan-refractory, advanced HNSCC. Eligibility criteria included recurrent/metastatic HNSCC, performance status (PS) 0-1, C resistance (defined as progression on or within 6 months of exposure), and resistance to or ineligibility for platinum and anti-PD1 mAb. Randomization was stratified by HPV status and center. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS). An arm was deemed worthy of further study if the lower bound of the 90% 1-sided confidence interval (CI) excluded the historical control of 2 months. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) in the overall and HPV-stratified populations. A Bayesian continuous monitoring rule for futility was applied. Results: 60 patients were randomized and 58 treated between Jan 2018 and Dec 2020 (27 to F; 33 to FC). Baseline characteristics were balanced across major prognostic variables including age, PS, HPV status, platinum resistance, and PD1 mAb exposure. Median time since prior cetuximab was 3.5 months (range 0-48 months). Grade ≥3 adverse events attributed to F included: pneumonitis (2); edema (3); diarrhea (1); LFT elevation (1); rash (2); electrolyte abnormality (2). The Table presents efficacy data. The F arm stopped for futility after 26 evaluable subjects accrued. The FC arm completed accrual and met the primary endpoint; 32 evaluable subjects had mPFS of 3.6 months (lower bound 90% 1-sided CI: 2.3 months) and ORR of 19% (6/32). All responses were in HPV- subjects, including 2 complete (CR) and 4 partial responses (PR) to the FC combination and 1 PR to F monotherapy. The mPFS and ORR for the HPV- population (n = 16) on FC were 3.8 months and 38% (6/16). Mechanistic signaling and immune biomarkers are under analysis. Conclusions: The well-tolerated FC combination met the primary PFS endpoint in pan-refractory, advanced HNSCC with notable activity in HPV- HNSCC, warranting phase III investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT03422536. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document