Phase II Study of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Ridaforolimus in Patients With Advanced Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Arthur P. Staddon ◽  
Laurence H. Baker ◽  
Scott M. Schuetze ◽  
Anthony W. Tolcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Spindle Cell Sarcoma ◽  
Open Label

PurposeRidaforolimus is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, an integral component of the phosphatidyl 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway, with early evidence of activity in sarcomas. This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted to assess the antitumor activity of ridaforolimus in patients with distinct subtypes of advanced sarcomas.Patients and MethodsPatients with metastatic or unresectable soft tissue or bone sarcomas received ridaforolimus 12.5 mg administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once daily for 5 days every 2 weeks. The primary end point was clinical benefit response (CBR) rate (complete response or partial response [PR] or stable disease ≥ 16 weeks). Safety, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to progression, and duration of response were also evaluated.ResultsA total of 212 patients were treated in four separate histologic cohorts. In this heavily pretreated population, 61 patients (28.8%) achieved CBR. Median PFS was 15.3 weeks; median OS was 40 weeks. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) confirmed response rate was 1.9%, with four patients achieving confirmed PR (two with osteosarcoma, one with spindle cell sarcoma, and one with malignant fibrous histiocytoma). Archival tumor protein markers analyzed were not correlated with CBR. Related adverse events were generally mild or moderate and consisted primarily of stomatitis, mucosal inflammation, mouth ulceration, rash, and fatigue.ConclusionSingle-agent ridaforolimus in patients with advanced and pretreated sarcomas led to PFS results that compare favorably with historical metrics. A phase III trial based on these data will further define ridaforolimus activity in sarcomas.

A phase II study of intravenous (IV) wild-type reovirus (Reolysin) in the treatment of patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas metastatic to the lung

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10524-10524 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Mita ◽  
K. Sankhala ◽  
J. Sarantopoulos ◽  
J. Carmona ◽  
S. Okuno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Open Label

10524 Background: Reolysin is a Dearing strain, naturally occurring, ubiquitous human reovirus. The PKR (double stranded RNA-activated protein kinase) is inhibited and therefore the virus replicates specifically in transformed cells possessing an activated Ras pathway producing lysis. In vitro and in vivo studies with Reolysin in sarcoma cell lines revealed significant antitumor activity. Methods: This phase II open-label, single agent study was designed to characterize the efficacy and safety of Reolysin given IV every 28 days in patients (pts) with bone or soft tissue sarcoma with lung metastasis using a Simon two-stage design. 38 pts were accrued to the first stage. If 1 or more pts experience clinical benefit (prolonged SD > 6 months, partial or complete response) up to 52 pts could be accrued. The agent will be considered active if 3 or more responses or prolonged SD are observed. Results: Since July 2007, 43 pts age 19–76 (median 49) were enrolled (20 female) and received a total of 141 cycles (range 1–18). All pts had performance status 1 (29 pts) or 0 (14 pts). 38 pts received prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, biological agents or combinations for their metastatic disease, 15 pts received more than 3 chemotherapy regimens. The sarcoma subtypes included: synovial sarcoma (13 pts), osteosarcoma (7 pts), leiomyosarcoma (7 pts), MFH (5 pts), Ewing/PNET (1 pt), chordoma (1 pt), others (9 pts). Side effects were mild to moderate (grade 1–2) and included constitutional symptoms fever, chills, fatigue. Two pts experienced respiratory side effects (cough and dyspnea) and 2 pts had diarrhea. Hematological side effects included grade 2–3 neutropenia (6 pts) and grade 2 thrombocytopenia (2 pts). One patient experienced grade 2 AST elevation. 33 pts are evaluable for response to date: 14 pts (42%) had SD for 2+ months including 5 pts having SD for more than 6 months. Conclusions: Utilization of single agent reovirus for treatment of sarcoma is a novel and unique therapeutic approach to date. Reolysin is well tolerated and shows promise for the treatment of metastatic sarcoma. Primary efficacy goals have been met. Accrual is ongoing to a total of 52 pts. [Table: see text]

Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of Sarcoma Alliance for Research Through Collaboration Study 002

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2755-2763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Maki ◽  
J. Kyle Wathen ◽  
Shreyaskumar R. Patel ◽  
Dennis A. Priebat ◽  
Scott H. Okuno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Adaptive Randomization ◽  
Number Of Patients

Purpose Gemcitabine as a single agent and the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel have activity in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. To determine if the addition of docetaxel to gemcitabine improved clinical outcome of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas, we compared a fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine versus a lower dose of gemcitabine with docetaxel. Patients and Methods In this open-label phase II clinical trial, the primary end point was tumor response, defined as complete or partial response or stable disease lasting at least 24 weeks. A Bayesian adaptive randomization procedure was used to produce an imbalance in the randomization in favor of the superior treatment, accounting for treatment-subgroup interactions. Results One hundred nineteen of 122 randomly assigned patients had assessable outcomes. The adaptive randomization assigned 73 patients (60%) to gemcitabine-docetaxel and 49 patients (40%) to gemcitabine alone, indicating gemcitabine-docetaxel was superior. The objective Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response rates were 16% (gemcitabine-docetaxel) and 8% (gemcitabine). Given the data, the posterior probabilities that gemcitabine-docetaxel was superior for progression-free and overall survival were 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel and 3.0 months for gemcitabine alone; median overall survival was 17.9 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel and 11.5 months for gemcitabine. The posterior probability that patients receiving gemcitabine-docetaxel had a shorter time to discontinuation for toxicity compared with gemcitabine alone was .999. Conclusion Gemcitabine-docetaxel yielded superior progression-free and overall survival to gemcitabine alone, but with increased toxicity. Adaptive randomization is an effective method to reduce the number of patients receiving inferior therapy.

Tolerability and Efficacy of Bortezomib Added to CVP-R for Previously Untreated Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma: Interim Analysis of a Phase II Study by the NCIC Clinical Trials Group.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1576-1576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie H Sehn ◽  
David A Macdonald ◽  
Sheldon H. Rubin ◽  
Morel Rubinger ◽  
Kevin R Imrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Acceptable Level ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Despite recent improvements in therapy, follicular lymphoma (FL) remains incurable with standard treatment, warranting investigation of new approaches. Bortezomib, the first-in-class proteasome inhibitor has demonstrated promising efficacy as a single agent in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with FL. This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of bortezomib to cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab (CVP-R). Methods: This is a phase II multi-center open-label trial adding bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 day 1&8) to standard dose C(750 mg/m2) V(1.4 mg/m2, capped at 2 mg) P(40 mg/m2 × 5) –R(375 mg/m2) for up to 8 cycles in pts with newly diagnosed stage III/IV FL requiring therapy. Planned accrual is 90 patients. A two-stage design was employed with a planned interim analysis of the first 28 patients to ensure an acceptable level of neurotoxicity (defined as less than 5/28 patients with grade 3/4 neurotoxicity after the first 4 cycles) and meaningful response rate (more than 12/28 patients with a complete response following 8 cycles), prior to enrolling remaining patients. Results: Median age of the first 28 patients was 55 years (range, 30–73). Fifty percent were male and 79% had stage IV disease. FLIPI score at study entry: low 14%, intermediate 43%, high 43%. Overall, the combination of bortezomib and CVP-R was extremely well tolerated. To date, no pts have developed grade 4 neurotoxicity and only 1/28 (4%) has developed grade 3 neurotoxicity within the first 4 cycles (neuropathic pain which resolved without need for treatment modification). The incidence of grade 1 and 2 neurotoxicity was 54% and 25% respectively. Only 3 pts discontinued therapy prematurely (2 pt refusal, 1 progressive disease). Ninety-four percent of planned bortezomib treatments in the first four cycles and 93% of vincristine doses were administered without dose reduction. Hematologic toxicity was mild, with no pts experiencing grade 3/4 anemia or thrombocytopenia. Only 2 episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred and no grade 3/4 infections were noted. Although it is too early to report on efficacy in this ongoing trial, response objectives for stage I have been met, and enrollment to stage 2 is underway. Conclusions: The addition of bortezomib to standard dose CVP-R is very well tolerated, with an acceptable level of neurotoxicity, without compromising the delivery of bortezomib or vincristine. This ongoing study will provide toxicity and efficacy data to facilitate the development of a planned phase III trial.

RAMSETE: A single-arm, multicenter, single-stage phase II trial of RAD001 (everolimus) in advanced and metastatic silent neuro-endocrine tumours in Europe.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4122-4122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne E. Pavel ◽  
Bertram Wiedenmann ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
Nicholas Reed ◽  
Juan W. Valle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Best Response

4122 Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Everolimus (RAD001), an oral mTOR inhibitor, has antitumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced NET. In this open-label, multicenter, phase II study (RAMSETE), the safety and efficacy of everolimus monotherapy was evaluated in pts with advanced nonsyndromic, nonpancreatic NET. Methods: Pts with advanced (unresectable or metastatic), progressive, nonsyndromic, nonpancreatic NET received everolimus (10 mg/day) as monotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (proportion of pts with best overall complete response [CR] or partial response [PR] per RECIST v1.0) by central radiologic review. A secondary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS). Results: By database soft lock (December 1, 2011), 73 pts from 16 European clinics received everolimus (median duration of treatment: 193 days). Fifty-five (75%) pts discontinued; reasons included disease progression (n=23), adverse events (AEs [n=23]), withdrawal of consent (n=4), death (n=3), and protocol deviation (n=2). In the per protocol population (N=60), 32 (53%) pts received prior antineoplastic therapy. The best response by central review was stable disease in 55%. By local review, 3 (5%) pts had a PR, with SD in 39 (65%) pts. Median PFS by central review was 185 days (95% CI: 158-255). Median PFS by local investigator review was 285 days (95% CI: 231-not estimable). 69 (95%) pts reported treatment-related AEs of any grade, including rash (n=28; 38%), diarrhea (n=20; 27%), mucosal inflammation (n=18; 25%), and decreased appetite (n=17; 23%). Treatment-related grades 3 and 4 AEs and serious AEs were reported by 27 (37%) and 18 (25%) pts, respectively. Conclusions: In this open-label trial of everolimus in pts with advanced, nonsyndromic, extrapancreatic NET, a high rate of disease stabilization was achieved after prior tumor progression with favorable median PFS. This study further supports efficacy of everolimus in types of NET other than those studied in RADIANT-3 (pancreatic NET) and RADIANT-2 (NET associated with carcinoid syndrome).

INMUNOSUN-SOGUG trial: A prospective phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of sunitinib as second-line (2L) treatment in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) who received immunotherapy-based combination upfront.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5060-5060
Author(s):  
Enrique Grande ◽  
Teresa Alonso Gordoa ◽  
Oscar Reig Torras ◽  
Emilio Esteban ◽  
Daniel Castellano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Onset Date ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

5060 Background: Immunotherapy (IO)-based combinations have replaced tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as standard upfront treatment of metastatic RCC pts. Selection of 2L treatment after progression to novel combinations in 1st-line (1L) is mostly based on retrospective series or subgroups analysis of randomized trials. We aim to evaluate the activity and safety of sunitinib in advanced RCC after progression on an IO-based 1L approach. Methods: This is a prospective, non-randomized, open-label and multicenter phase II study. Pts with ECOG 0-2 and locally advanced or metastatic RCC after treatment in 1L with a prior PD-1 and/or PD-L1 and/or CTLA-4 inhibitor were included. Sunitinib was administered at 50 mg/day on a 4/2 schedule until disease progression. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v 1.1 criteria. Results: Twenty pts were enrolled in the study. Median age was 66 yo, 70% had intermediate prognosis by Heng's scale, and 88% ECOG 1. 45% of pts received atezolizumab, 30% pembrolizumab, 20% nivolumab and 15% ipilimumab-based regimens as 1L. ORR to 1L treatment was 45%. Median time from end of 1L to sunitinib onset date was 1.1 months (0.3-22.1). Two (10%) pts had partial response with sunitinib and 11 (55%) stable disease for a total disease control rate of 65%. With a median follow-up of 8.8 months, median PFS was 6.8 months (0.0-13.9) and median OS 13.6 months (10.5-16.6). Median duration of treatment was 4 months (0.9-16-2). Most common treatment-related adverse events, all grades, were asthenia (55%), dysgeusia (35%), diarrhea (30%), hypertension (30%), mucosal inflammation (25%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (25%), anemia (20%), neutropenia (20%) and nausea (15%); grade 3 were asthenia (15%), hypertension (10%) and neutropenia (10%). Conclusions: To our knowledge, the INMUNOSUN trial is the first study to evaluate prospectively the activity of a single agent TKI in a pure 2L setting of metastatic RCC pts treated with an IO-based approach upfront. ORR and PFS with sunitinib seem lower than expected when used as a 1L. Consistency in toxicity profile was observed. Clinical trial information: NCT03066427 .

A phase II study of aflibercept (VEGF trap) in recurrent or metastatic gynecologic soft-tissue sarcomas: A study of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5591-5591
Author(s):  
C. Townsley ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
P. Hoskins ◽  
R. Buckanovich ◽  
H. Mackay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Vascular Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Vegf Trap

5591 Background: Targeting angiogenesis and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) represents a promising approach to treat highly vascular tumors, like gynecologic sarcomas. Aflibercept, a long-acting inhibitor of VEGF signaling, potently binds and inactivates VEGF, thus blocking tumor angiogenesis and growth. Methods: This is a single-arm, open-label, two-stage phase II clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of aflibercept as treatment for patients (pts) with recurrent, or metastatic gynecologic soft tissue sarcoma. Aflibercept was administered at 4 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks and pts had radiologic imaging performed every 8 weeks. The primary endpoints were response rate and prolonged stable disease. Results: Twenty-five pts with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus and 13 pts with carcinosarcoma of the uterus were enrolled in 2 cohorts. In the leiomyosarcoma group, 24/25 pts had an ECOG of <1, most pts (22/25) had <1 previous lines of treatment and 7/25 pts had prior radiotherapy. A total of 149 cycles were administered for this group, with a median of 4 (range 2–28). In the carcinosarcoma group, 10/13 pts had an ECOG of <1, most pts (12/13) had <1 previous lines of treatment and 5/13 pts had prior radiotherapy. A total of 31 cycles were administered with a median of 3 (range 1–4). The most frequent adverse events experienced by all pts, of any grade, were fatigue 71% pts, constipation 53% and hypertension 39% . The most frequent grade 3 or higher, adverse events were hypertension 18%, fatigue 13% and lymphopenia 8%. Eight pts with leiomyosarcoma had stable disease (4pts > 6 mo). No reponses were seen in either cohort and no stable disease was seen in the carcinosarcoma group. Median overall survival was 15.1 mo (95% CI: 8.5 - not reached) for the leiomyosarcoma cohort and 3.1 mo for the carcinosarcoma cohort (95% CI: 1.9 - not reached). The requirements to proceed to stage 2, in leiomyosarcoma, were met after more than 2/21 patients had > 6 mo PFS. Carcinosarcoma cohort has not finished stage 1 and both cohorts continue accrual. Conclusions: VEGF-trap was well tolerated in this pt population with acceptable side effects. Initial efficacy data suggests modest activity, particularly in patients with leiomyosarcoma. [Table: see text]

Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) CONTROL NET Study: Phase II study evaluating the activity of 177Lu-Octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (LuTate PRRT) and capecitabine, temozolomide CAPTEM)—First results for pancreas and updated midgut neuroendocrine tumors (pNETS, mNETS).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4608-4608
Author(s):  
Nick Pavlakis ◽  
David Turner Ransom ◽  
David Wyld ◽  
Katrin Marie Sjoquist ◽  
Rebecca Asher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Tumour Response ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Relative Activity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Study Phase ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Who Grade

4608 Background: CAPTEM is an accepted regimen for patients (pts) with advanced pNETs. Single agent 177Lu-Octreotate PRRT is now a standard of care for progressive WHO Grade (G) 1/2 mNETs. High activity was seen with LuTate/CAPTEM in a single arm Phase I/II trial. This study was undertaken to determine the relative activity of adding CAPTEM to LuTate PRRT in pts with mNETs and pNETs. Methods: Non-comparative randomised open label parallel group phase II trial with 2:1 randomisation to PRRT/CAPTEM (experimental arm) vs. PRRT (mNETs control) and CAPTEM (pNETS control). PRRT/CAPTEM: 7.8GBq LuTate day(D) 10, 8 weekly (wkly) x 4, with b.i.d. oral CAP 750mg/m2 D1-14 & TEM 75mg/m2D10-14, 8 wkly x 4; PRRT: 8 wkly x 4; CAPTEM 8 wkly x 4. Primary endpoint: Progression free survival (PFS). mNETS- at 15 months (mo) assuming 15mo PFS 66.4% in control arm, aiming for PFS ³ 80%; pNETS- at 12mo assuming 12mo PFS 60% in control arm, aiming for PFS ³ 75%. Secondary endpoints: Objective tumour response rate (complete or partial) (OTRR), clinical benefit rate (OTRR, stable disease) (CBR), toxicity, quality of life. Results: 75 pts enrolled (Dec 2015 – Nov 2018): mNETs 33 PRRT/CAPTEM and 14 PRRT; pNETS 19 PRRT/CAPTEM and 9 CAPTEM. mNETS: Median follow-up 35mo; 15mo PFS was 90% (95% CI: 73-97%) v 92% (95% CI: 57-99%); OTRR 31% vs 15%; and CBR 97% vs 92% for PRRT/CAPTEM v PRRT respectively. Treatment related adverse events (AEs): 24/32 PRRT/CAPTEM pts had at least one G3 event (75%) vs 5/13 (38%, PRRT); and 4/32 pts at least one G4 event (13%) v 1/13 (8%) respectively, mostly haematologic (haem). Only one patient failed to complete therapy (PRRT/CAPTEM). pNETS: Median follow-up 34mo; 12mo PFS was 76% (95% CI: 48-90%) v 67% (95% CI: 28-88%); OTRR 68% vs 33%; and CBR 100% vs 100% for PRRT/CAPTEM v CAPTEM respectively. Treatment related AEs: 5/18 PRRT/CAPTEM pts had at least one G3 event (28%) vs 3/9 (33%) CAPTEM; 3/18 pts at least one G4 event (17%) v 1/9 (11%) respectively. Conclusions: CAPTEM/PRRT is active, meeting its target landmark PFS for CAPTEM/PRRT (12mo pNETs; 15mo mNETs) with numerically greater OTRR in both pNETs and mNETs, but with more haem toxicity in mNETs. As activity was high in both control arms longer follow up is required to determine if the relative activity of PRRT/CAPTEM is sufficient to warrant Phase III evaluation. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12615000909527 .

A randomized phase II trial of cabozantinib combined with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11583-TPS11583
Author(s):  
Vanessa Anne Eulo ◽  
Breelyn A. Wilky ◽  
Jingqin Luo ◽  
Angela C. Hirbe ◽  
Mia C. Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Setting

TPS11583 Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies with poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. Current standard therapy includes anthracycline based chemotherapy. Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in solid tumors such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A phase II study of cabozantinib in advanced STS is underway. Cabozantinib in combination with immune checkpoint blockade has shown clinical benefit in several tumor types including HCC, RCC, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Since cabozantinib may alter PD-1 expression in regulatory T-cells and promote an immune permissive environment, we hypothesize that combining cabozantinib with immune checkpoint inhibition is a therapeutic strategy that will be more effective than cabozantinib alone. Additionally, the design of the trial will allow assessment of whether pretreatment with cabozantinib will enhance the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab alone. Methods: This is an open label, multicenter, randomized phase II clinical trial of cabozantinib (60mg orally daily as a single agent, 40mg in combination) with or without combination Ipilimumab (ipi, 1mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses) and Nivolumab (nivo, 3mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for four doses, then 480mg IV every 4 weeks) in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic STS refractory to up to two lines of chemotherapy. 105 pts with non-translocation driven sarcomas will be enrolled at three US sites and randomized 2:1 to the combination group. Pts will be stratified by prior pazopanib use and balanced for histologies. Patients who progress on arm A will cross over to combination therapy (arm B). The primary efficacy endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. 35 patients in Cohort A (cabozantinib alone) and 70 patients in Cohort B (cabozantinib plus ipi/nivo) will be required to detect an increase of the ORR from 10% in cohort A to 30% in cohort B with 81% power with a one-sided alpha level of 10%. Key eligibility criteria include: at least 18 years of age, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, ≤2 prior lines of therapy and measurable disease. Exclusion criteria include: translocation-driven sarcoma except alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), prior immunotherapy, and chronic use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppression. Secondary endpoints are safety, overall and progression free survival, disease control rate, and response rate to ipilimumab and nivolumab after cabozantinib pretreatment. Mandatory tumor biopsies pre-treatment and at 6 weeks will be obtained. Peripheral blood will be collected for circulating immune phenotyping. Enrollment will occur at 3 participating institutions and is expected to be completed in 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04551430.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Final Results of a Randomized Trial From Italian (ISG), Spanish (GEIS), French (FSG), and Polish (PSG) Sarcoma Groups

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (19) ◽  
pp. 2178-2186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Gronchi ◽  
Emanuela Palmerini ◽  
Vittorio Quagliuolo ◽  
Javier Martin Broto ◽  
Antonio Lopez Pousa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Nerve Sheath Tumor ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cox Models

PURPOSE To determine whether the administration of histology-tailored neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HT) was superior to the administration of standard anthracycline plus ifosfamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy (A+I) in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of an extremity or the trunk wall. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial. Patients had localized high-risk STS (grade 3; size, ≥ 5 cm) of an extremity or trunk wall, belonging to one of the following five histologic subtypes: high-grade myxoid liposarcoma (HG-MLPS); leiomyosarcoma (LMS), synovial sarcoma (SS), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive three cycles of A+I or HT. The HT regimens were as follows: trabectedin in HG-MLPS; gemcitabine plus dacarbazine in LMS; high-dose prolonged-infusion ifosfamide in SS; etoposide plus ifosfamide in MPNST; and gemcitabine plus docetaxel in UPS. Primary and secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using Cox models adjusted for treatment and stratification factors. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01710176 ). RESULTS Between May 2011 and May 2016, 287 patients (UPS: n = 97 [33.8%]; HG-MLPS: n = 65 [22.6%]; SS: n = 70 [24.4%]; MPNST: n = 27 [9.4%]; and LMS: n = 28 [9.8%]) were randomly assigned to either A+I or HT. At the final analysis, with a median follow-up of 52 months, the projected DFS and OS probabilities were 0.55 and 0.47 (log-rank P = .323) and 0.76 and 0.66 (log-rank P = .018) at 60 months in the A+I arm and HT arm, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSION In a population of patients with localized high-risk STS, HT was not associated with a better DFS or OS, suggesting that A+I should remain the regimen to choose whenever neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used in patients with high-risk STS.

Randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus ifosfamide plus doxorubicin or mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin against advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1269-1275 ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Edmonson ◽  
L M Ryan ◽  
R H Blum ◽  
J S Brooks ◽  
M Shiraki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Receive Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group B ◽  
Survival Differences

PURPOSE This three-armed phase III study in adults with advanced soft tissue sarcomas was planned as a comparison of objective regression rates, toxicity, and survival of patients receiving doxorubicin alone, ifosfamide plus doxorubicin, and mitomycin plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between December 1987 and July 1990, 279 patients with histologically confirmed sarcomas were enrolled to receive treatment A (doxorubicin 80 mg/m2), treatment B (ifosfamide 7.5 g/m2 plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m2), or treatment C (mitomycin 8 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2). RESULTS Of 262 assessable patients, 74 (29%) achieved objective tumor regression. Objective regression occurred in 20% of the 90 patients who received doxorubicin alone (complete remission [CR] rate, 2%), in 34% of the 88 who received ifosfamide plus doxorubicin (CR rate, 3%), and in 32% of the 84 who received mitomycin plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin (CR rate, 7%). With grade 3 or greater myelosuppression in 53% of group A, 80% of group B, and 55% of group C, regimen B was significantly more myelosuppressive than either regimen A or C (P = .01) with two, three, and one treatment-related deaths, respectively. Synovial sarcomas were responsive to ifosfamide plus doxorubicin, especially among patients younger than 40 years of age. CONCLUSION Ifosfamide plus doxorubicin produced a significantly higher regression rate (P = .03) than did doxorubicin alone; however, this was achieved at a level of myelosuppression significantly more intense than that produced by the single agent or by the three-drug combination. Mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin also appeared to be more active than the single agent; however, at a myelosuppression level similar to that of doxorubicin alone, this trend (P = .07) did not attain the usual level for significance. No significant survival differences were observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document