Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) trial of NGR-hTNF given at high doses in patients with refractory solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2580-2580
Author(s):  
Paolo Andrea Zucali ◽  
Matteo Simonelli ◽  
Fabio De Vincenzo ◽  
Elena Lorenzi ◽  
Matteo Perrino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
Initial Area ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Ngr Peptide ◽  
Soluble Tnf Receptors ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Necrosis Factor

2580 Background: NGR-hTNF exploits the asparagine-glycine-arginine (NGR) peptide for selectively targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) to a CD13 overexpressed by tumor vasculature. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of NGR-hTNF was previously established at 45 µg/m2, when given as 1-h infusion every 3 weeks (q3w), with dose limiting toxicities (DLT) being grade 3 infusion-related reactions (IRRs). We explored further dose escalation by prolonging infusion time (2-h) and using premedication (paracetamol). Methods: DLTs were defined as drug-related grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs). PK and soluble TNF receptors (sR1-sR2) were tested in 46 pts. The volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans) and initial area under gadolinium concentration (IAUGC) were assessed before and 2 hours after dosing by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in 37 pts. Results: 12 dose levels (DLs) from 60 to 325 μg/m² q3w were evaluated. 48 pts (PS 0/1: 21/27; M/F: 37/11; median age: 61 years) received a total of 117 cycles (range 1-6). Prior regimens ranged from 1 to 7 (median 3). No DLT occurred and MTD was not reached. Study-emergent grade 3 and 4 AEs were reported in 12 (25%) and 5 (10%) pts, respectively. Grade 1/2 IRRs included chills (58%) and pyrexia (56%). Both Cmax (p<.0001) and AUC (p=.0001) increased with dose. Post-treatment peaks of sR2 were higher than sR1 (9.6 v 4.9 ng/mL; p<.0001). However, changes in sRs did not differ across DLs, with a plateau in shedding kinetics. By DCE-MRI assessment, median pre- and post-first cycle values declined from 0.15 to 0.09 min-1 for Ktrans (p=.02) and from 10.2 to 7.2 mM/L/sec for IAUGC (p =.0005). Over treatment, 28 pts (76%) showed decreases in IAUGC (-47%, p<.0001) and Ktrans (-59%; p<.0001) that were inversely correlated with baseline Ktrans values (p<.0001) and NGR-hTNF Cmax (p=.03). Of 41 evaluable pts, 12 (29%) had stable disease for a median time of 2.9 months. Survival at 1 year was 34%, with improved survival observed in pts with lower sTNF-R2 levels (p=.01) and greater Ktrans reductions (p=.05) after 1st cycle. Conclusions: NGR-hTNF can be safely escalated at doses higher than MTD and induces low shedding of receptors and early antivascular effects.

A phase Ⅰ open-label dose-escalation study of AL2846 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16210-e16210
Author(s):  
Rui Liu ◽  
Ting Deng ◽  
Ming Bai ◽  
Le Zhang ◽  
Tao Ning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

e16210 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive cancer with a 5-year survival rate of 10%. Overexpression of c-Met is associated with the poor prognosis in patients with PDAC and it was noted that phosphorylation of c-Met is increased in gemcitabine-resistant PDAC. AL2846 is an oral c-Met inhibitor, which targets multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK’s) primarily including c-Met, VEGFR1, KIT, Axl and RET. The combination of AL2846 with chemotherapy may improve the clinical efficacy of PDAC. Based on these consideration, a phase Ⅰ clinical trial was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AL2846 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced PDAC and to clarify the potential anti-tumor activity. Methods: Patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic PDAC were enrolled to receive oral AL2846 once daily in a fasted state in combination with gemcitabine intravenous infusion over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The starting dose level is AL2846 40 mg and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2. Primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), defined as the highest dose level at which ≤33 % of patients incurred a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and RP2D. Secondary endpoints included response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: As of January 1, 2021, a total of 15 patients with PDAC were enrolled and received 4 dose-levels of AL2846 (40 mg: n = 1; 60 mg: n = 6; 90 mg: n = 3; 120 mg: n = 5) treatment. DLTs occurred in 1 patient who experienced grade 3 abnormal liver function. The most common grade 3 or above drug-related adverse events were neutropenia (n = 7, 46.7%), thrombocytopenia (n = 5, 33.3%), leukopenia (n = 4, 26.7%), GGT increased (n = 4, 26.7%), hyperbilirubinemia (n = 3, 20.0%) and alkaline phosphatase increased (n = 3, 20.0%). Among the 15 patients available for efficacy evaluation, 1 patient (6.6%) achieved partial response who was at the dose levels of 90mg. There were 4 patients whose PFS was more than 5 months. Although there were no more than 2 DLT events, we chose 90 and 120 mg as the target dose for RP2D according to the dose reduction and proportion of gemcitabine. Conclusions: The RP2D of AL2846 in combination with standard dose of gemcitabine were 90 and 120 mg QD continuously. The results demonstrated that AL2846 in combination with gemcitabine was well tolerated at doses up to 120 mg. Further clinical studies about the efficacy of AL2846 in pancreatic cancer are in progress. Clinical trial information: CTR20201021.

scholarly journals Tg.rasH2 Mice and not CByB6F1 Mice Should Be Used for 28-Day Dose Range Finding Studies Prior to 26-Week Tg.rasH2 Carcinogenicity Studies

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhav G. Paranjpe ◽  
Jessica Belich ◽  
Tom J. Vidmar ◽  
Reem H. Elbekai ◽  
Marie McKeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Selection Process ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Dose Selection ◽  
Range Finding ◽  
Body Weights ◽  
Vehicle Test ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Dose Levels

Our recent retrospective analysis of data, collected from 29 Tg.rasH2 mouse carcinogenicity studies, determined how successful the strategy of choosing the high dose for the 26-week studies was based on the estimated maximum tolerated dose (EMTD) derived from earlier 28-day dose range finding (DRF) studies conducted in CByB6F1 mice. Our analysis demonstrated that the high doses applied at EMTD in the 26-week Tg.rasH2 studies failed to detect carcinogenic effects. To investigate why the dose selection process failed in the 26-week carcinogenicity studies, the initial body weights, terminal body weights, body weight gains, food consumption, and mortality from the first 4 weeks of 26-week studies with Tg.rasH2 mice were compared with 28-day DRF studies conducted with CByB6F1 mice. Both the 26-week and the earlier respective 28-day studies were conducted with the exact same vehicle, test article, and similar dose levels. The analysis of our results further emphasizes that the EMTD and subsequent lower doses, determined on the basis of the 28-day studies in CByB6F1 mice, may not be an accurate strategy for selecting appropriate dose levels for the 26-week carcinogenicity studies in Tg.rasH2 mice. Based on the analysis presented in this article, we propose that the Tg.rasH2 mice and not the CByB6F1 mice should be used in future DRF studies. The Tg.rasH2 mice demonstrate more toxicity than the CByB6F1 mice, possibly because of their smaller size compared to CByB6F1 mice. Also, the Tg.rasH2 males appear to be more sensitive than the female Tg.rasH2 mice.

Phase I study of temozolomide in children and adolescents with recurrent solid tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 3037-3043 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Nicholson ◽  
M Krailo ◽  
M M Ames ◽  
N L Seibel ◽  
J M Reid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

PURPOSE The Children's Cancer Group conducted a phase I trial of temozolomide stratified by prior craniospinal irradiation (CSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS Children and adolescents with recurrent or progressive cancer were enrolled. Temozolomide was administered orally daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses administered every 21 to 28 days after full hematologic recovery. Dose levels tested included 100, 150, 180, 215, 245, and 260 mg/m2 daily. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients on the non-CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. During the first three dose levels (100, 150, and 180 mg/m2 daily), only grades 1 and 2 hematologic toxicity occurred. One patient at 215 mg/m2 daily had grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Three of eight patients (38%) treated at 245 to 260 mg/m2 daily had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which included both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Twenty-two patients on the CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. Hematologic DLT occurred in one of six patients (17%) at 100 mg/m2 daily and in two of four patients (50%) at 215 mg/m2 daily. No nonhematologic DLT occurred; nausea and vomiting occurred in more than half of the patients. After two courses of temozolomide, 10 patients had stable disease (SD), and three patients had a partial response (PR), one of whom subsequently had a complete response (CR) that persists through 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide for children and adolescents without prior CSI is 215 mg/m2 daily and for those with prior CSI is 180 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses that begin on day 28. Temozolomide is well tolerated and should undergo phase II testing in children and adolescents.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Irinotecan and Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Preliminary Evidence of Clinical Activity

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1116-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex A. Adjei ◽  
Cheri E. Klein ◽  
Helen Kastrissios ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Steven R. Alberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Intravenous Infusion ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and describe the toxicities of the combination of irinotecan and docetaxel administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced malignancies and, also, to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel and describe preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients received 85 courses (median, two courses; range, one to 15 courses) of treatment with irinotecan, administered over 90 minutes by intravenous infusion, followed by docetaxel, administered over 60 minutes by intravenous infusion. Four escalating dose levels of irinotecan/docetaxel (160/50 mg/m2, 160/65 mg/m2, 200/65 mg/m2, and 200/75 mg/m2) were studied. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel. RESULTS: The most common and dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, which consisted of neutropenia that was severe (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [NCI CTC] grade 4) but brief (< 5 days) in 11 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicities of anorexia, nausea, and stomatitis were mild to moderate (NCI CTC grades 1 and 2), but there was one incidence each of both CTC grade 3 anorexia and nausea. All patients had total alopecia. Diarrhea was dose-dependent and severe in four patients who failed to take adequate antidiarrhea therapy. Five out of 16 assessable patients, one with cholangiocarcinoma, one with leiomyosarcoma, and three with non–small-cell lung cancer, achieved partial remissions. CONCLUSION: The combination of irinotecan and docetaxel causes significant reversible myelosuppression, which was dose limiting but led to no serious sequelae. There was no evidence of a clinically significant interaction using these two agents in this sequence. The combination showed antitumor activity at all the dose levels tested and should be further studied in a number of tumor types. The recommended phase II dose on this schedule is irinotecan 160 mg/m2 and docetaxel 65 mg/m2.

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1723-1723
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Esther Masih-Khan ◽  
Arooj Khan ◽  
Peter Anglin ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽  
Varicella Zoster ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone is a convenient regimen in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM), with a partial response (PR) rate of 40% and median progression-free survival of 19 months in our retrospective analysis of patients in first or second relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (Trieu Y, et al, Mayo Clin Proc2005; 80: 1582). We sought to enhance the efficacy of this regimen by adding oral lenalidomide (Revlimid®), a potent anti-myeloma agent, in a phase I-II trial. The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8 and 15, lenalidomide on days 1–21, and prednisone 100 mg every other day in a 28-day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given to all patients (pts) as prophylaxis for DVT. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 by 3 dose escalation design. Between 11/2007–07/2008, 15 pts with relapsed/refractory MM were entered onto study. Median age was 60 (45–78) years and 60% were male. Immunoglobulin subtype was IgGκ:λ in 10:1; IgA κ:λ in 2:1 and κ light chain in 1. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–3) and 14 had undergone previous ASCT, including double transplants in 2 pts. Prior therapy also included thalidomide in 3 (20%) and bortezomib in 6 (40%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 9, but none had 13q deletion, t(4;14) or p53 deletion. At the time of protocol entry, median β2-microglobulin level was 222 (92–325) nm/L, albumin 38 (35–46) g/L, creatinine 78 (50–100) μmol/L, platelet count 230 (93–318) x 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.9–9.0) x 109/L. Protocol treatment is summarized in Table 1. Dose level N Cyclophosphamide dose (mg/m2) Lenalidomide dose (mg) Prednisone dose (mg) Median # cycles given 1 3 150 15 100 9 2 3 150 25 100 6 3 6 300 25 100 4 3 (expanded) 3 300 25 100 1 Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any of the dose levels and the maximum tolerated dose of this regimen has not yet been reached at the highest dose level planned; all pts remain on active therapy. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 1 pt (cohort 2) and neutropenia in 4 pts (1 in cohort 1, 1 in cohort 2 and 2 in cohort 3) and were managed with dose reduction and/or growth factor support. No episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred in any pt. Only 1 pt experienced varicella zoster; routine antiviral prophylaxis was not used. Other grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon and included abdominal pain/bacteremia in 1 pt in cohort 1, hypokalemia in 1 pt in cohort 2, and DVT in 1 pt in cohort 3. Mild grade 1/2 constipation (47%), muscle cramps (33%) and fatigue (33%) were also noted. To date, best response includes the following: dose level 1 (1 near complete remission [nCR], 2 PR); dose level 2 (3 PR); dose level 3 (4 PR, 2 minimal response [MR]); expanded cohort 3 (1 MR, 2 too early). We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28-day cycle with minimal toxicity; 2) the overall response rate (nCR + PR + MR) in 13 evaluable pts to date is 87%; 3) no pts have progressed in this preliminary analysis; 4) longer follow-up is required to assess the long-term efficacy of this regimen.

A phase I clinical study of biweekly carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12024-12024
Author(s):  
P. Kumar ◽  
M. Keshtgarpour ◽  
H. Kumar ◽  
A. Dudek
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels

12024 Background: Carboplatin (CBDCA) and gemcitabine (GEM) in combination is used commonly in lung cancer and is administered on a 21 day cycle. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CBDCA and GEM administered on a biweekly schedule and to assess safety and efficacy of this schedule. Methods: GEM was given intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes followed by CBDCA also given IV over 30 minutes. This combination was given on day 1 every 2 weeks. The dose levels examined are shown in the Table . A total of 26 patients were studied (18 male, 8 female) with median age of 56 (range 41–83 years); ECOG performance status of 24 patients were 0 (5), 1 (16), 2 (2), 3 (1); prior chemotherapy ranged from 0 to 4 regimens; median number of cycles administered per patient was 3 (range 1–9) with a total of 81 cycles. The primary tumors were lung (11), melanoma (4), head and neck (3), squamous cell penile/toe (2), bladder (2), kidney (1), gastric (1), esophageal (1) and ovary (1). Results: No DLTs were seen in any of these patients and the MTD was not reached. Delay in treatment was seen in total of 6 cycles due to myelosuppression and 1 cycle due to nausea and anorexia. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity rates: anemia - 3/81 cycles (3.7%), neutropenia - 20/81 cycles (25%), and thrombocytopenia - 4/81 cycles (5%). Non-hematological toxicity was mild. The median time to progression was 40 days (range 4–133) and of 18 evaluable patients partial response or stable disease was seen in 7 (38.8%). Conclusions: Even at maximum tested dose of GEM at 2000 mg/m2 and CBDCA at AUC of 3.0, this schedule is well tolerated. Hematological toxicity such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was minimal. We plan to study this schedule of GEM and CBDCA in appropriate tumor types in combination with biologic agents. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Phase I, safety, pharmacokinetic and biomarker study of BAY 57–9352, an oral VEGFR-2 inhibitor, in a continuous schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3040-3040
Author(s):  
H. Gelderblom ◽  
J. Verweij ◽  
N. Steeghs ◽  
A. Van Erkel ◽  
L. Van Doorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Patient ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Ca Antagonist ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3040 Background: BAY 57–9352 is a potent competitive inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 (IC50: 6 nM), VEGFR-3 (IC50: 4 nM), PDGFR-β and c-KIT tyrosine kinases. BAY 57–9352 showed tumor efficacy in colon, breast, pancreatic and NSCLC models. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors received oral BAY 57–9352 on a continuous basis, in escalating doses. One cycle was defined as 21 days of treatment. Extensive PK and PD (dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [DCE-MRI]) evaluations were performed. Plasma biomarkers (e.g. VEGF)were also evaluated. Results: Forty patients (median 54 yrs) were enrolled at seven dose levels from 20 mg solution once daily to1500 mg twice daily (bid; 150 mg tablets) for a total of 169 cycles (range 1–17). The most frequent drug-related adverse events were nausea, hypertension, headache, vomiting, hoarseness, rash, dry skin and anorexia. One patient treated at 600 mg bid had a dose-limiting toxicity defined by an increase from grade 2 to 3 hypertension, despite the addition of an ACE-inhibitor and Ca-antagonist on day 8 of cycle 2. Another patient at that same dose level and also on day 8 cycle 2, had grade 3 AST/ALT increase, however this was not assessed as dose-limiting. Both patients continued treatment after dose reductions. Treatment was well tolerated, even at the highest dose levels. One patient with a hemangio-endothelioma (600 mg bid) had a clinical response and one desmoid tumor patient (900 mg bid) had a 53% reduction in tumor volume. BAY 57–9352 AUC increased dose proportionally up to 900 mg bid. The target AUC, based on animal models (5 mg × h/L) was reached in all patients at 900 mg bid. Dose levels exceeding 900 mg bid had similar plasma VEGF biomarker levels. Conclusions: BAY 57–9352 was well tolerated in doses up to 1500 mg bid. Based on safety, PK, PD and biomarker assessments, the recommended dose level is 900 mg bid. A 300 mg tablet is being tested for patient convenience. Combination chemotherapy studies have been started. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of BAY 57–9352, a VEGFR-2 inhibitor, in cycles of 14 days on/7 days off in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3089-3089
Author(s):  
D. Strumberg ◽  
K. Mross ◽  
M. Scheulen ◽  
A. Frost ◽  
S. Hedbom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
Plasma Biomarkers ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Favorable Safety ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

3089 Background: BAY 57–9352 (BAY) inhibits the VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 tyrosine kinases, in addition to PDGFR-β and c-kit. BAY showed anti-tumor activity in colon, breast, pancreatic, and NSCLC preclinical models. Methods: This study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of oral BAY in 14 days on/7 days off treatment cycles until discontinuation due to toxicity or progression. PK was assessed on days 1 and 14 of cycle 1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) was performed at baseline and in cycles 1–3. Plasma biomarkers (VEGF, sVEGFR-2) were assessed at each cycle. Results: 77 patients (pts) were enrolled at doses from 20 mg once daily to 1500 mg twice daily (bid). Common tumor types were CRC (31%) and RCC (16%). Frequent drug-related adverse events (≥5% pts) were hypertension (all grades, 11 pts [14%]; grade 3, 10 [13%]), hoarseness (10 [13%], only grade 1/2), anorexia (7 [9%], only grade 1/2), myalgia (6 [8%], only grade 1/2), fatigue (5 [6%], only grade 1/2), and diarrhea (all grades, 4 [5%]; grade 3, 1 [1%]). Hypertension in cycle 1 caused a dose reduction/interruption in 3 pts. One pt had diarrhea in cycle 7 requiring a dose reduction. One pt discontinued due to fatigue in cycle 8. BAY AUC increased dose-proportionally up to 900 mg bid. As measured by DCE-MRI, pts with CRC showed the greatest decrease in iAUC60 of Gd-DTPA, a parameter related to tumor blood flow and permeability. One pt with RCC achieved a partial response (PR); another had significant tumor shrinkage not reaching formal criteria (RECIST) for PR. PD responses (VEGF and sVEGFR-2 levels) increased in a dose-dependent manner up to 900 mg bid. Conclusions: The MTD was not reached for BAY up to 1500 mg bid in a 14 days on/7 days off schedule. BAY had a favorable safety profile. Tumor efficacy was shown in individual patients. The PD effect of BAY was demonstrated by DCE-MRI and plasma biomarkers. The recommended dose for Phase II evaluations is 900 mg bid. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of bortezomib plus cetuximab in patients with tumors expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18143-18143 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Dudek ◽  
P. Gada ◽  
K. Mulamalla ◽  
N. Shehadeh
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Human Antibody ◽  
Chimeric Mouse ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

18143 Background: Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that augments EGFR inhibitor activity (Cancer Research 2007; 67:(2),1–8). Cetuximab is a chimeric mouse-human antibody against EGFR that has been found to induce tumor responses in patients with colon cancer and head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study was to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination of bortezomib plus cetuximab in patients with EGFR-expressing epithelial tumors. Methods: A 21-day treatment cycle was given with a maximum of six cycles per patient. Bortezomib was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 via dose escalation, beginning with a minimum dose of 1.3 mg/m2 and increasing in one-tenth increments to 2.0 mg/m2 for a total of eight dose levels. Cetuximab was delivered with an initial dose of 400mg/m2 on day 1 cycle 1, with subsequent doses of 250mg/ m2 on days 1, 8 and 15. Results: Twenty patients (13 male and 7 female) with an ECOG PS <2 were enrolled in this study from November 2005 to December 2006. The median age was 59.5 (range: 41- 68), and the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 5 (range 1–7). Primary tumor sites included lung (9), head and neck (4), kidney (3), pancreas (2), bladder (1), and ovary (1). A total of 54 cycles of chemotherapy were administered; the median number of cycles per patient was 2.5 (range 1–6). Thirteen patients discontinued therapy because of disease progression. Two patients completed all six cycles of therapy. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen at dose level 4 (bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2), which included grade 3 nausea, vomiting and dysphagia based on evaluation using CTCAE (version 3.0). Level 4 was expanded to enroll 3 additional patients, and no further grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. Grade 3/4 non- hematological toxicities were observed in 14 patients after their first cycle of therapy. Nine patients had delay in treatment. Conclusions: MTD for bortezomib plus cetuximab was not achieved at dose levels 1–6. This combination therapy has shown limited clinical activity in our extensively pretreated group of patients with solid tumors. Complete results for all dose levels, including dose levels 7–8, will be reported at the 2007 meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of BAY 73–4506, a multikinase inhibitor, administered for 21 days on/7 days off in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3593-3593 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hedbom ◽  
S. Steinbild ◽  
A. Frost ◽  
M. Büchert ◽  
C. Unger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Parent Drug ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Exposure Level ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
Grade 3

3593 Background: BAY 73–4506 is a multikinase inhibitor targeting both the tumor and its vasculature. BAY 73–4506 inhibits VEGFR-2 and -3, and tumor cell signaling kinases (RET, KIT, PDGFR, and Raf). This drug shows potent, oral activity in a wide variety of preclinical xenograft models. Methods: This phase I dose-escalation trial investigated the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of BAY 73–4506 given orally in 21 days on/7 days off cycles, until discontinuation due to toxicity or tumor progression. PK was assessed on days 1 and 21 of cycle 1. PD markers included dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and circulating sVEGFR-2 and VEGF levels assessed at each cycle. Tumor response was evaluated per RECIST criteria. Results: 22 patients (pts) with documented progressive disease were enrolled at doses of 10 mg to 120 mg once daily. Tumor types included CRC (27%), RCC (18%) and pancreatic cancer (14%). Pts had received a median of 3 prior therapies, including anti-VEGF agents in 5 pts. BAY 73–4506 PK appeared linear with dose; the AUC target exposure level of 13 mg*h/L (from preclinical models) was reached at 30 mg. The major metabolite of BAY 73–4506 (active in vitro) reached a similar AUC(0–24)ss as the parent drug at 120 mg. Commonly reported drug-related adverse events (=10% of pts) were hoarseness (7 [32%], all CTC grade 1), hypertension (5 [23%], all CTC grade 1–2), fatigue (3 [14%], CTC grade 3 in 1 pt [5%]), hand-foot-skin reaction (HFSR) (3 [14%], CTC grade 3 in 1 pt [5%], mucositis (3 [14%], all CTC grade 1). Maximum tolerated dose was exceeded at 120 mg with dose-limiting toxicities including fever without documented infection, HFSR, fatigue, and leukopenia. 2 pts (RCC & osteosarcoma) achieved RECIST partial response. 4 pts had stable disease, one of them a cervical cancer pt with extensive tumor cavitation. PD parameters (decrease in sVEGFR-2 levels, decrease in iAUC60s of Gd-DTPA by DCE-MRI) correlated with drug exposure. Conclusions: BAY 73–4506 was well tolerated at 60 mg with report of dose-limiting toxicities at 120 mg. 6 (28%) of 22 pts demonstrated antitumor activity. Optimal dose and regimen are under evaluation in preparation for phase II trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document