A phase I study of lapatinib (LPT) and cetuximab (CTX) in patients with CTX-sensitive solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2590-2590
Author(s):  
John F. Deeken ◽  
Hongkun Wang ◽  
Jimmy J. Hwang ◽  
John Marshall ◽  
Deepa Suresh Subramaniam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Preclinical Research ◽  
Oncogenic Pathways ◽  
Pathway Activation ◽  
Rash Management

2590 Background: Preclinical research has shown that one mechanism of acquired resistance to CTX is via EGFR-ErbB2 heterodimerization, which can reactivate oncogenic pathways. LPT is a dual EGFR and ErbB2 intracellular tyrosine kinase inhibitor. A phase I translational clinical study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and clinical activity of CTX and LPT in patients with EGFR-driven solid tumor malignancies that can be treated with CTX. Methods: Patients (Pts) were enrolled in a 3+3 dose escalation trial. Prior CTX therapy was allowed. CTX was given at 400mg/m2 on Cycle 1, Day 1 (C1D1), then 250 mg/m2 weekly. LPT dose levels (DL) were (1) 750mg, (2) 1000mg, and (3) 1250mg orally daily. Rash management included daily sunblock, steroid cream, and doxycycline. Cycle length was 21 days, and patients were assessed for toxicity through the end of C2, and for efficacy after every 2 cycles. Fresh tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline and at the end of C1 to compare EGFR and ErbB2 expression levels and EGFR related pathway activation. DNA from blood samples was analyzed for pharmacogenetic (PGx) variations and correlations with toxicity and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: Between October, 2010 to January 2012, 13 pts were enrolled, with colon (4), lung (3), head and neck (3), and anal cancers (3); 10 were evaluable for toxicity. Treatment-related toxicities of any grade included: rash (67%), diarrhea (42%), fatigue (33%), nausea/vomiting (17%), and dehydration (8%). DLTs included G3 rash in 1 of 6 pts on DL1, and G3 diarrhea despite optimal therapy in 1 of 4 pts on DL2. Enrollment to DL2 continues. Of 7 pts evaluable for response, 1 had an uPR, 3 had SD, including 1 with SD of ≥4 cycles, and 3 had DP. Both patients with uPR and prolonged SD were treated on DL1. Tumor EGFR-ErbB2 and EGFR pathway phosphorylation analyses and PGx results will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of CTX and LPT is well tolerated with expected toxicities. Efficacy was seen even on DL 1. Phase II clinical studies in CTX-sensitive diseases such as colon and head and neck cancer are planned.

Phase I study of irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) with sunitinib for advanced gastroesophageal cancers (EGC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15569-e15569
Author(s):  
Sarbajit Mukherjee ◽  
Christos Fountzilas ◽  
Patrick McKay Boland ◽  
Kristopher Attwood ◽  
Wei Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Free Survival

e15569 Background: Sunitinib (S) is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against VEGFR, PDGRF, KIT, FLT-3, and RET. S is synergistic with chemotherapy in preclinical models. We hypothesized that S+FOLFIRI combination will have increased efficacy in advanced EGC. Methods: This was a phase I study for patients with advanced chemo naïve EGC. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability and safety of S+FOLFIRI. Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: Twenty-three patients participated in the study (Male 78%, Female 22%). Median age was 60 (Range: 37-77) years. Median follow up time was 67.5 (95% CI: 58.9, 76) months. The most frequently reported adverse events were neutropenia (78%; G3/4: 43%), nausea (74%; G3/4:13%), diarrhea (65%; G3/4: 4%), vomiting (61%, G3/4: 9%) lymphopenia (52%; G3/4: 13%) and fatigue (52%; G3/4:17%).Two dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were noted each at dose level (DL) 1 and 1A, one at DL 1B and 3 at DL 2 (Table 1). Maximum tolerated dose was determined at DL 1B. At the time of data reporting 21 patients had died. Two patients came off the study per investigator request. All patients were evaluated for efficacy. The median OS and PFS were 12.4 (95% CI: 8.9, 16.5) months and 6.2 (95% CI: 3.4, 13.5) months, respectively. Conclusions: S+FOLFIRI was reasonably tolerated, with a manageable safety profile and signs of clinical activity in patients with advanced EGC. This study was supported by a research grant from Pfizer, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT00524186. [Table: see text]

A phase I study of MK-2206 in combination with lapatinib in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2607-2607
Author(s):  
Kari Braun Wisinski ◽  
Amye Tevaarwerk ◽  
Maria Bell ◽  
Mark E. Burkard ◽  
Jens C. Eickhoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Combination Methods

2607 Background: The AKT protein kinase is a key mediator of signaling in the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) pathway. HER2 inhibition can result in feedback regulation of signaling, leading to high AKT activity. Preclinical studies demonstrate activity of combined HER2 and AKT inhibition. Lapatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER2. MK-2206 is an oral selective inhibitor of AKT with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 60mg qod. Both agents cause rash and diarrhea. This study was designed to determine the MTD, dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), adverse events (AEs), clinical activity and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of the combination. Methods: This phase I study evaluated the safety of MK-2206 (30-60 mg qod) and lapatinib (1000-1500 mg qd) continuously. Cycles were 28 days, except cycle 1 (35 days), due to a 1 week MK-2206 lead-in to evaluate for PK interactions. Because of the continuous nature of therapy, protocol-specified intolerable grade 2 AEs were considered DLTs during cycle 1. Results: 23 pts (median age 59 [range 22-72];15 female:8 male) were enrolled. The most common malignancies were colorectal (8 pts), lung (4 pts), and breast (3 pts). 4 pts were unevaluable per protocol; 19 evaluable pts were on study a median of 8 weeks (range 3-35). 3 pts experienced DLTs. At dose level one, 1 pt had grade (gr) 3 hyponatremia and fatigue. At dose level four, 1 pt had gr 4 hyponatremia, gr 3 rash and hypocalcemia and 1 pt had intolerable gr 2 mucositis with delivery of <75% of drug. The most common AEs at least possibly related to therapy included diarrhea (gr 3-4 in 3 pts; gr 1-2 in 16 pts), nausea (gr 3 in 2 pts; gr 1-2 in 14 pts) and rash (gr 3 in 2 pts; gr 1-2 in 12 pts). The MTD was 45mg po qod of MK-2206 with 1500 mg po qd of lapatinib, exceeding biologically active doses for each agent. One pt with adrenal cortical carcinoma was on study for 6 months with stable disease (SD) and 1 pt with colorectal cancer was on study for 5 months with significant tumor marker decline and SD. PK analyses are ongoing. Conclusions: MK-2206 in combination with lapatinib is well-tolerated at biologically active single agent doses. Anti-tumor activity will be evaluated further in a dose expansion cohort in pts with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01245205.

A phase I pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of the selective aurora kinase inhibitor GSK1070916A.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2525-2525
Author(s):  
Iain McNeish ◽  
Alan Anthoney ◽  
Paul Loadman ◽  
Dan Berney ◽  
Simon Joel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Functional Imaging ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Healthy Skin ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Phosphohistone H3

2525 Background: GSK1070916A is a potent and selective inhibitor of Aurora B and C. This phase I study in collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline was part of the Cancer Research UK Clinical Development Programme. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic solid cancers for whom there was no standard therapy, with adequate performance status and organ function were eligible for GSK1070916A (1 hour i.v. infusion days 1 – 5, every 21 days). The primary objectives were to determine the safety profile, dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of GSK1070916A. The starting dose was 5mg/m2/day, with initial single pt cohorts, followed by “3 + 3” cohorts and expansion at the MTD. DLTs included prolonged (> 5 days) or complicated grade 4 neutropenia; the MTD was the highest dose at which < 1 of 3 - 6 pts experienced DLT. Cycle 1 blood and healthy skin biopsies were obtained for PK and PD assays. The expanded cohort included 6 pts having pre- and post-treatment functional imaging studies (FDG PET-CT and MRI), and a further 6 having paired tumour biopsies for PD studies. Results: Nine single pt cohorts received up to 73mg/m2/day of GSK1070916A with no grade 3 or 4 related adverse events. At 102.2mg/m2/day, 1 pt had a DLT (febrile neutropenia) and 2 pts non-DLT grade 4 neutropenia; this dose was considered unacceptably toxic and 23 pts received a lower dose of 85mg/m2/day; 7/23 pts had prolonged/complicated grade 4 neutropenia, 5 of whom continued GSK1070916A with dose reduction +/- delay. There were no treatment related deaths. A pt with ovarian cancer (102.2mg/m2/day) had a RECIST PR; 19 pts had stable disease for < 223 days. GSK1070916A PK were linear with a strong correlation between exposure (AUC) and reduction in neutrophils (r2 0.91). At the 85 mg/m2 dose, mean day 1 t1/2 was 8.98 hours and Cl 9.2 l/h; AUCinf was 10% higher on day 5 than day 1. PD results in healthy skin (phosphoHistone-H3, Ki 67 and cleaved caspase-3) were inconsistent. Conclusions: The MTD of GSK1070916A as a 1 hour i.v. infusion on days 1 – 5, every 21 days is 85mg/m2/day, with predictable and manageable neutropenia as the DLT and evidence of clinical activity. Serum levels of cytokeratin-18, tumour PD and functional imaging data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01118611.

Phase I/II Study of Ipilimumab for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (36) ◽  
pp. 5950-5956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S. Weber ◽  
Steven O’Day ◽  
Walter Urba ◽  
John Powderly ◽  
Geoff Nichol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Profile ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Multiple Doses ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

PurposeThe primary objective of this phase I/II study was to determine the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of either transfectoma- or a hybridoma-derived ipilimumab. Secondary objectives included determination of a maximum-tolerated dose and assessment of clinical activity.Patients and MethodsEighty-eight patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma with at least one measurable lesion were treated. Mean age was 59 years, with 65% male and 35% female patients, and 79% of patients had received prior systemic therapy. Single doses of ipilimumab up to 20 mg/kg (group A, single dose), multiple doses up to 5 mg/kg (group A, multiple dose), and multiple doses up to 10 mg/kg (group B) were administered.ResultsSingle dosing up to 20 mg/kg of transfectoma antibody was well tolerated, as were multiple doses up to 10 mg/kg without a maximum-tolerated dose. In group B, dose-limiting toxicity was seen in six of 23 melanoma patients. Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were observed in 14% of patients (12 of 88 patients), and grade 1 or 2 irAEs were seen in an additional 58%. The half-life of ipilimumab was 359 hours. In group B, there was one partial response (23+ months), one complete response (21+ months), and seven patients with stable disease (SD), for a disease control rate of 39%. Two patients in group B with SD had slow, steady decline in tumor burden that was ongoing at 1 year of observation.ConclusionIpilimumab has activity in patients with metastatic melanoma. Late responses were observed in patients with prolonged SD.

scholarly journals Overcoming Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas V. dos Santos ◽  
Carina M. Abrahão ◽  
William N. William
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinomas ◽  
Clinical Activity

Preclinical data suggest that head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) may evade immune surveillance and induce immunosuppression. One mechanism of immune evasion involves the expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in tumor and immune cells, which is, to date, the only biomarker routinely used in clinical practice to select patients with advanced HNSCCs more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy. Nonetheless, PD-L1 expression alone incompletely captures the degree of sensitivity of HNSCCs to PD-1 inhibitors. Most patients exposed to anti-PD-1 antibodies do not respond to therapy, suggesting the existence of mechanisms of de novo resistance to immunotherapy. Furthermore, patients that initially respond to PD-1 inhibitors will eventually develop acquired resistance to immunotherapy through mechanisms that have not yet been completely elucidated. In this article, we will provide an overview of the immune landscape of HNSCCs. We will briefly describe the clinical activity of inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in this disease, as well as biomarkers of benefit from these agents that have been identified so far. We will review pre-clinical and clinical work in cancers in general, and in HNSCCs specifically, that have characterized the mechanisms of de novo and acquired resistance to immunotherapy. Lastly, we will provide insights into novel strategies under investigation to overcome resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

scholarly journals Phase I Trial of Copanlisib, a Selective Pi3k Inhibitor, in Combination With Cetuximab in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grégoire Marret ◽  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
Keyvan Rezai ◽  
Jocelyn Gal ◽  
Esma Saada-Bouzid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pi3k Inhibitor ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Disease Stabilization

Abstract BackgroundThe phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase pathway is often altered in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and is involved in the resistance to EGFR inhibitors. ObjectiveWe investigated the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of copanlisib, an intravenous, pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, with the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab in recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC patients in a phase I dose-escalation trial. Patients and methodsCopanlisib was given intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles at the dose of 45 mg and 30 mg, in combination with standard doses of weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m² loading dose followed by 250 mg/m² on days 8, 15, and 22, and weekly thereafter). ResultsThree patients received copanlisib 45 mg, of whom two experienced grade 3 hyperglycemia during Cycle 1 that met the DLT criteria. Eight patients were then treated with copanlisib at the dose of 30 mg. Because of the occurrence of hyperglycemia, a premedication with metformine was introduced on the day of the injections. No DLTs were reported at this dose level. The trial was stopped early because of the unfavourable toxicity profile of the combination. Among eight evaluable patients for response, four patients (50%) had disease stabilization according to RECIST1.1 as best response.ConclusionCopanlisib combined with cetuximab demonstrated unfavorable toxicity and limited efficacy in heavily pretreated recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC patients. NCT02822482, Date of registration: June 2016.

Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of weekly cisplatin combined with weekly irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 3858-3865 ◽  
Author(s):  
L B Saltz ◽  
D Spriggs ◽  
L J Schaaf ◽  
G K Schwartz ◽  
D Ilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Irinotecan Dose ◽  
Pharmacologic Study

PURPOSE In vitro synergy between cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) has been reported. We designed a combination schedule of these agents to maximize the potential for synergistic interaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS To maximize the opportunity for synergy, we divided the cisplatin into four consecutive weekly treatments, followed by a 2-week rest. Each dose of cisplatin was immediately followed by a dose of irinotecan. The dose of cisplatin was fixed at 30 mg/m2/wk. The initial irinotecan dose was 50 mg/m2/wk and this was escalated by 30% increments in successive cohorts of three to six patients to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), were analyzed. RESULTS Of 35 patients with solid tumors enrolled onto this trial, 30 were assessable for toxicity and response. The MTD for this regimen was 30 mg/m2/wk of cisplatin plus 50 mg/m2/wk of irinotecan in previously treated patients and 30 mg/m2/wk of cisplatin plus 65 mg/m2/wk of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naive patients. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) encountered in this trial. Diarrhea was infrequent and rarely dose-limiting. Seven of 30 assessable patients achieved a partial response. No alteration in irinotecan, SN-38, or SN-38G pharmacokinetics resulted from the administration of cisplatin with irinotecan. CONCLUSION The administration of cisplatin and irinotecan on this weekly schedule provides a practical and well-tolerated regimen that has the potential to maximize any clinical synergy between the two agents. Evidence of substantial clinical activity was seen in this phase I study.

Phase I Trial of 72-Hour Continuous Infusion UCN-01 in Patients With Refractory Neoplasms

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 2319-2333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward A. Sausville ◽  
Susan G. Arbuck ◽  
Richard Messmann ◽  
Donna Headlee ◽  
Kenneth S. Bauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Protein Binding ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Plasma Protein Binding ◽  
Plasma Protein ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the novel protein kinase inhibitor, UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine), administered as a 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion (CIV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with refractory neoplasms received UCN-01 during this phase I trial. Total, free plasma, and salivary concentrations were determined; the latter were used to address the influence of plasma protein binding on peripheral tissue distribution. The phosphorylation state of the protein kinase C (PKC) substrate alpha-adducin and the abrogation of DNA damage checkpoint also were assessed. RESULTS: The recommended phase II dose of UCN-01 as a 72-hour CIV is 42.5 mg/m2/d for 3 days. Avid plasma protein binding of UCN-01, as measured during the trial, dictated a change in dose escalation and administration schedules. Therefore, nine patients received drug on the initial 2-week schedule, and 38 received drug on the recommended 4-week schedule. DLTs at 53 mg/m2/d for 3 days included hyperglycemia with resultant metabolic acidosis, pulmonary dysfunction, nausea, vomiting, and hypotension. Pharmacokinetic determinations at the recommended dose of 42.5 mg/m2/d for 3 days included mean total plasma concentration of 36.4 μM (terminal elimination half-life range, 447 to 1176 hours), steady-state volume of distribution of 9.3 to 14.2 L, and clearances of 0.005 to 0.033 L/h. The mean total salivary concentration was 111 nmol/L of UCN-01. One partial response was observed in a patient with melanoma, and one protracted period ( > 2.5 years) of disease stability was observed in a patient with alk-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Preliminary evidence suggests UCN-01 modulation of both PKC substrate phosphorylation and the DNA damage-related G2 checkpoint. CONCLUSION: UCN-01 can be administered safely as an initial 72-hour CIV with subsequent monthly doses administered as 36-hour infusions.

Maximum tolerated dose in a phase I trial on adaptive dose painting by numbers for head and neck cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Indira Madani ◽  
Fréderic Duprez ◽  
Tom Boterberg ◽  
Christophe Van de Wiele ◽  
Katrien Bonte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Painting
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document