Retrospective mathematical analysis of serial prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurements for patients with M0 prostate cancer treated with intermittent androgen suppression (IAS).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15201-e15201
Author(s):  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Yoshito Hirata ◽  
Koichiro Akakura ◽  
Nicholas Bruchovsky ◽  
Kazuyuki Aihara
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Similar Distribution ◽  
Castration Resistance ◽  
Group I ◽  
Intermittent Androgen Suppression ◽  
The Individual

e15201 Background: Recently a phase III trial demonstrated that IAS was non-inferior to continuous AS in men with M0 disease after primary or salvage radiation and quality of life was better in the intermittent arm (Crook ASCO 2011). In that trial, men were treated with 8 months of AS followed by a variable time off AS driven by the absolute PSA value. The Hirata mathematical model describes the dynamics of prostate cancer treated with IAS (Hirata et al, J of Theoretical Biol 2010). In the model, there are three classes of cancer cells: a class of androgen dependent (AD) cells and two classes of androgen independent (AI:X1 and AI:X2) cells. During AS, AD cells will change to the two AI classes, and during the off treatment period, AI:X1 cells will revert to AD cells whereas AI:X2 cells cannot revert to either AD or AI:X1 cells. Methods: After IRB approval, we applied the Hirata model using serial monthly PSAs from men with M0 disease treated with IAS from Japan, Canada, and the United States. The proportions of men from each country who fell into the 3 categories of patients previously defined by the Hirata model were compared. Results: Serial PSAs from 26 men from Japan, 72 from Canada, and 79 from US were put into the model. The 3 categories of patients from the model include: (i) those with disease that will remain androgen sensitive and will respond to IAS without development of castration resistance (CRPC) (ii) those who will benefit from IAS but will develop CRPC sooner than those in group (i), (iii) those for whom continuous AS is superior to IAS. The datasets from each country show a similar distribution among the categories, and overall there were 42%, 51%, and 7% falling into groups i, ii, and iii respectively. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis shows that men with M0 disease treated with IAS fall into the 3 categories predicted by the Hirata model in similar proportions, regardless of country of origin. The ability to apply this model to the individual patient in the clinic is currently under development. The model may ultimately be able to optimize both the on and off treatment durations of IAS and to predict those patients who will most benefit from this approach.

scholarly journals Apalutamide in the treatment of castrate-resistant prostate cancer: evidence from clinical trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 445-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim S. Koshkin ◽  
Eric J. Small
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Progression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castrate Resistant

Apalutamide (ARN-509) is a second-generation androgen receptor (AR) antagonist that was developed to inhibit AR-mediated prostate cancer cell proliferation. Following the initial promising clinical efficacy results in phase I and II clinical trials of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), apalutamide has been investigated in several phase III trials. Particular interest has focused on the development of effective therapy for the prevention of disease progression in patients with nonmetastatic (nm or M0) CRPC, especially patients who have a rapid prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time that is indicative of shorter bone metastasis-free survival and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The results from the phase III SPARTAN trial were recently published and reported a significant benefit of apalutamide relative to placebo in patients with nmCRPC and a high risk of metastatic progression. The study noted marked improvement in the primary endpoint of metastasis-free survival as well as several relevant secondary clinical endpoints, including time to symptomatic progression. These results led to the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) approval of apalutamide in the nmCRPC setting in February 2018. This review summarizes the clinical development of apalutamide, culminating with the pivotal SPARTAN trial as well as other phase III trials which may further expand potential indications for this agent in the near future.

Healthcare resource use (HRU) in men with metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) only or no treatment in the United States (US).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19138-e19138
Author(s):  
Xuehua Ke ◽  
Marie-Hélène Lafeuille ◽  
Hela Romdhani ◽  
Frederic Kinkead ◽  
Peter St. John Francis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
The United States ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Castration Resistance ◽  
Diagnosis Code ◽  
The Us

e19138 Background: mCSPC is clinically complex. Although consensus on treatments are evolving, ADT remains the backbone of therapy. This study assessed the proportion of mCSPC patients treated with ADT only or remaining untreated and their HRU during the mCSPC period in the US. Methods: The Optum Clinformatics Extended DataMart was used to identify men with ≥2 claims for prostate cancer (PC), ≥1 claim for metastasis, ≥1 castration sensitivity (CS) indicator (CS diagnosis code [dx]; castration and no prostate-specific antigen [PSA] rise; or hormone/castration naive for ≥18 months [mo] before index [date of 1st metastasis dx on or after 1st PC dx and between 2015-2018]). Patients were excluded if they had a pre-index castration-resistance (CR) indicator (CR dx; castration within ≥90 days pre-index or with PSA rise; or a claim for a drug solely recommended for metastatic CRPC). mCSPC period (F/U) was defined as time from index until CR (i.e., any post-index CR indicator or initiation of abiraterone acetate or docetaxel ≥12 mo after post-index ADT initiation or ≥12 mo post-index for those with no ADT) or end of data. The proportion of patients receiving ADT only or no mCSPC treatment during F/U was reported. Per-patient-per-year (PPPY) all-cause HRU were evaluated during baseline (12 mo pre-index) and F/U. Descriptive statistics were used: n (%) for binary and mean [SD] for continuous variables. Results: A total of 2,825 mCSPC patients were identified (age: 75 [9] years). Of these, 2,181 (77%) received ADT only or no treatment in a F/U of 10.9 [9.0] mo. Among them, there were more patients with ≥1 inpatient (IP) stay or ≥1 emergency room (ER) visit (F/U vs. baseline; IP: 50% vs. 20%; ER: 57% vs. 44%), and patients had more IP stays and ER visits (IP: 2.0 [4.0] vs. 0.3 [0.7] stays; ER: 3.2 [7.1] vs. 1.1 [2.2] visits) and more IP days (27 [61] vs. 3 [11] days) PPPY in F/U vs. baseline. Trends were similar among patients receiving ADT only (N=1,252 [44%]; F/U of 12.6 [9.0] mo; Table). Conclusions: The majority of mCSPC patients were treated with ADT only or remained untreated and incurred substantial HRU. These findings suggest that improvements in therapy and prompt treatment initiation in men with mCSPC are needed to improve outcomes. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals 177Lu-PSMA Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 430
Author(s):  
Yasemin Sanli ◽  
Duygu Has Simsek ◽  
Oner Sanli ◽  
Rathan M. Subramaniam ◽  
Ayse Tuba Kendi
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Meta Analyses

The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the current status of 177Lu-PSMA (prostate specific membrane antigen) therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the light of the current literature. We also addressed patient preparation, therapy administration and side effect profiles. 177Lu-PSMA therapy efficacy was assessed by using prospective trials, meta-analyses and major retrospective trials. Predictors of efficacy were also mentioned. Although there are some different approaches regarding the use of 177Lu-PSMA therapy in different countries, this type of therapy is generally safe, with a low toxicity profile. From the oncological point of view, a PSA (prostate specific antigen) decline of ≥50% was seen in 10.6–69% of patients with mCRPC; whereas progression-free survival (PFS) was reported to be 3–13.7 months in different studies. Consequently, 177Lu-PSMA therapy is a promising treatment in patients with mCRPC, with good clinical efficacy, even in heavily pretreated patients with multiple lines of systemic therapy. Currently, there are ongoing clinical trials in the United States, including a phase III multicenter FDA registration trial.

scholarly journals The Role and Significance of Bioumoral Markers in Prostate Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 5932
Author(s):  
Traian Constantin ◽  
Diana Alexandra Savu ◽  
Ștefana Bucur ◽  
Gabriel Predoiu ◽  
Maria Magdalena Constantin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Blood Test ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
The United States ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Internal Organs ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Oncology Treatment

The prostate is one of the most clinically accessible internal organs of the genitourinary tract in men. For decades, the only method of screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has been digital rectal examination of 1990s significantly increased the incidence and prevalence of PCa and consequently the morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. In addition, the different types of oncology treatment methods have been linked to specific complications and side effects, which would affect the patient’s quality of life. In the first two decades of the 21st century, over-detection and over-treatment of PCa patients has generated enormous costs for health systems, especially in Europe and the United States. The Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) is still the most common and accessible screening blood test for PCa, but with low sensibility and specificity at lower values (<10 ng/mL). Therefore, in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies, several screening tests (blood, urine, or genetic) have been developed. This review analyzes the most used bioumoral markers for PCa screening and also those that could predict the evolution of metastases of patients diagnosed with PCa.

Association of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) variations with biological biomarkers for patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (MCRPC) treated by abiraterone/prednisone combination or prednisone.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 54-54
Author(s):  
Morgan Goujon ◽  
Amelie Anota ◽  
Alexandre Frontczak ◽  
Emilie Charton ◽  
Tristan Maurina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castrate Resistant

54 Background: A potential link between Health-Related Quality of life (HRQoL) and oncologic outcomes such as overall survival or progression-free survival has been underlined for endocrine therapies in patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Other surrogates such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or PSA can be used to evaluate disease control. This study explored the associations between HRQoL and biological biomarkers for patients with mCRPC treated by abiraterone / prednisone or prednisone within registration phase III trial COU-AA-301. Methods: Baseline differences of HRQoL evaluated with FACT-P total score (FACT-P TS) according to biological parameters (including CTCs and PSA) and links between HRQoL's change and variations of these parameters were assessed. The primary objective was to estimate the association between improvement or deterioration in FACT-P TS and the variations of CTCs and PSA. All analyses were conducted using clinically meaningful improvement and deterioration in FACT-P TS and subscales. Results: Among 1130 patients enrolled, 1111 (98.3%) had a baseline FACT-P TS available. At baseline, a favorable CTCs count was associated with higher FACT-P TS compared to unfavorable CTCs (difference in means 8 points, [95% CI, 4 to 12] p < 0.001). At 3 months, there were differences in mean change from baseline FACT-P TS favoring patients with biomarkers response, with clinically meaningful difference for CTCs (12.7 points, [95% CI, 6 to 19.5%] p < 0.001) and PSA (11.64 points, [95% CI, 9.3 to 14] p < 0.0001). Biological progression was associated with higher risk of FACT-P TS worsening for PSA (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.8 [95% CI, 1.9 to 4.2]) with more frequent FACT-P TS improvement in case of response for CTCs (OR 3.14 [95% CI, 1.3 to 7.7]) and PSA (OR 2.9 [95% CI 2.1 to 4]). Significantly longer time until definitive deterioration was observed for patients with CTCs or PSA response (p < 0.001) and shorter time in case of progression (p < 0.001). Conclusions: QUA-lify is the first study to show an association between HRQoL and biomarkers outcomes in patients with mCRPC treated with endocrine therapy in a post-taxane setting. This concept is reinforced by the consistency of the association for all analyses carried out.

A phase III, randomized, open-label, study (CONTACT-02) of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus second novel hormone therapy (NHT) in patients (pts) with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS190-TPS190
Author(s):  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Arun Azad ◽  
Joan Carles ◽  
Simon Chowdhury ◽  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Cancer Aggressiveness

TPS190 Background: Cabozantinib inhibits multiple tyrosine kinases, including MET, VEGFR, RET, and TAM kinases (Tyro3, AXL, MER), involved in tumor growth and angiogenesis, and whose mutations and expression are associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness and poor prognosis. Targeting these kinases with cabozantinib may promote an immune permissive tumor environment and may enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In the ongoing phase 1b COSMIC-021 study of pts with solid tumors, cabozantinib plus the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab, showed preliminary meaningful clinical activity in soft tissue disease and a tolerable safety profile for 44 pts with mCRPC (Agarwal et al., ASCO 2020; abstract 5564). We present the study design of a phase 3 trial of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus second NHT in pts with mCRPC. Methods: This randomized, open-label, controlled phase 3 study (NCT04446117) evaluates the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus second NHT (abiraterone or enzalutamide) in pts with mCRPC who previously received one NHT to treat metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC), non-metastatic CRPC (M0 CRPC), or mCRPC. Additional eligibility criteria include histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate, measurable visceral disease or measurable extrapelvic adenopathy per RECIST 1.1 by investigator, prostate specific antigen progression and/or soft-tissue disease progression, ECOG 0 or 1, and age ≥18 years. Key exclusion criteria include prior nonhormonal therapy for mCRPC and uncontrolled significant illness. Eligible pts (N = 580) are randomized 1:1 to receive cabozantinib (40 mg PO QD) + atezolizumab (1200 mg IV Q3W) vs abiraterone (1000 mg PO QD) + prednisone (5 mg PO BID) or enzalutamide (160 mg PO QD). Designated NHT will differ from previous NHT taken. Randomization is stratified by: liver metastasis (yes, no), prior docetaxel treatment for mCSPC (yes, no), and disease stage for which the first NHT was given (mCSPC, M0 CRPC, mCRPC). Treatment will continue until there is no longer clinical benefit as determined by the treating investigator, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The multiple primary endpoints are progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC) and overall survival. Additional endpoints include objective response rate per RECIST 1.1 by BIRC, safety, correlation of biomarkers with outcomes, quality of life and pharmacokinetics. Patient enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04446117.

scholarly journals Cabazitaxel for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Retrospective Data Analysis from an Indian Centre

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 506-515
Author(s):  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Vamshi Krishna Muddu ◽  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Kumar Prabhash
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Retrospective Data Analysis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Named Patient Programme

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients from the named patient programme (NPP) at our centre. Methods: mCRPC patients who progressed on docetaxel were given cabazitaxel intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Overall survival, progression-free survival, prostate-specific antigen response, quality of life (QOL) changes, and safety were reported. Results: Nine men received cabazitaxel (median: 7 cycles; range: 1–27) under the NPP and were followed until death. Median survival was 14.07 months (1.07–23.80) and progression-free survival was 2.67 months (1.07–20.27). QOL was stable for most patients. Common adverse events (grade ≥3) were neutropenia (n = 8), anaemia (n = 4), and leucopenia (n = 4). Conclusion: These data from 9 patients are consistent with the results reported in the TROPIC study with a manageable safety profile.

scholarly journals Prostate-Specific Antigen Density: A Measurement to Differentiate Benign Hypertrophy of Prostate from Prostate Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Chandan Kumar Nath ◽  
Bhupen Barman ◽  
Pranjal Phukan ◽  
Stephen L. Sailo ◽  
Biswajit Dey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen Density ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Set Up ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Background Determination of isolated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in asymptomatic individuals has not demonstrated sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be useful in the routine evaluation of prostate disease. To enhance the accuracy of serum PSA we have used a proportion of serum PSA and prostate volume, which we refer to as prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD). Prostate volume in this study was calculated using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Materials and Methods A total of 106 patients with prostatic disease clinically confined to the prostate glands were evaluated. Results and Observation The mean PSAD for prostate cancer was 0.15 ± 0.01 while that for benign hypertrophy of the prostate (BPH) was 0.11 ± 0.02 (p < 0.05). Significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted in the prostate volume in these two groups with the mean prostate volume measured by TRUS in the BPH to be 53.85 ± 9.71 mL compared with 58.14 ± 7.48 mL in the carcinoma. PSA density of 0.13 ng/mL can be used as a cutoff for the individual in our set-up who should go for prostate biopsy with sensitivity and specificity of over 90%. Conclusion These results suggest that PSAD may be useful in distinguishing BPH and prostate cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document