A risk-based individualized follow-up after complete surgery as an effective procedure to reduce the relapse (R) impact in GIST patients (pts).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10552-10552
Author(s):  
Erica Palesandro ◽  
Danilo Galizia ◽  
Lorenzo D'Ambrosio ◽  
Paola Boccone ◽  
Sandra Aliberti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Final Outcome ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Negative Prognostic Factor ◽  
Appropriate Therapy ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

10552 Background: FU care poses a burden on both pts and health system. FU aims to precociously identify recurrences, metastases or treatment-related adverse events so to undertake the appropriate therapy as soon as possible. Guidelines (NCCN, ESMO) admit lack of knowledge on optimal surveillance, but suggest FU based on experts’ opinion and risk stratification. Moreover, tumor burden (TB) is a well known negative prognostic factor (Van Glabbeke 2005). Therefore, low-TB at R might affect final outcome. To identify the impact, if any, of regular FU, we examined our prospectively collected database looking for Rs in which the early detection affected both clinical management and, likely, the outcome. Methods: 140 pts were stratified (AFIP classification). High risk (HR) pts had complete history + physical examination (H&P) and CT every 3 mos for 2 years, 4 mos in 3rd year, 6 mos in the 4th and 5th yrs, yearly thereafter; intermediate (IR), low (LR) and very low risk (VLR) pts had H&P + CT every 4 mos for 2 years, every 6 mos up to the 5th year, then yearly. Rs were divided in: low-TB + completely resectable R (Group 1) and high-TB + disseminated R (Group 2). The number of CT needed to detect (NND) one R and the incidence of early (<6 mos) R was calculated. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In 73 male and 67 female, median age 63 (23-82), risk stratification was: HR 73, IR 31, LR 28, VLR 8. After a median FU of 63 mos we observed 58 Rs: 25 (43%) and 33 (57%) in group 2 and 1, respectively. Relapsed pts genotype was KIT Ex11 72%; Ex9 10%; Ex13 3%; wild-type 15%. Median time to R was 16 mos (1-120). 21 pts underwent surgical resection of their R. 16 pts remained free from progression for a median of 90 mos. We detected 15 (26%) early Rs. NND was 17 and 32 CT for HR and non-HR pts, respectively. Group 1 and 2 median estimated OS was 112 and 87 mos (p=.05), respectively. Conclusions: Though retrospective, this series shows that FU may detect low-TB Rs. In principle, this might affect pts final outcome and, therefore, justify this costly effort. Since it is difficult to foresee a prospective randomized trial, a confirmation of these data in a different series might increase their reliability.

scholarly journals The Impact of Switching from Short-Term Teriparatide Treatment to Denosumab Therapy Compared with Denosumab Alone for Patients with Osteoporotic Hip Fracture: A 1-Year Follow-up Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan Ho Park ◽  
Jun-Il Yoo ◽  
Chang Hyun Choi ◽  
You-Sung Suh
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
T Score ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: Switching the prescription from bone-forming medication to resorptive agents is reportedly effective for patients with severe osteoporosis. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of implementing short-term teriparatide (TPTD) intervention before denosumab (DMab) therapy compared with DMab therapy alone for 1 year after hip fracture.Methods: TPTD was administered to 24 patients for an average of 12.1 weeks after which the intervention was switched to DMab therapy for 12 months (group 1). DMab alone was administered to 16 patients for 12 months (group 2). Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated before and after treatment at the 1-year follow-up. The improvement of BMD and T-score in hip and spine was compared with the levels of bone turnover marker.Results: The difference of hip BMD after osteoporosis treatment was -0.0081±0.03 in group 1 and 0.0074±0.04 in group 2 (p=0.180). The difference of spine BMD was 0.0819±0.04 in group 1 and 0.0145±0.03 in group 2 (p<0.001). BMD and T-score of the spine improved significantly in groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in C-terminal telopeptide and osteocalcin level. Conclusion: Short-term TPTD administration followed by DMab alone was effective only in improving spine BMD. Short-term treatment with TPTD caused mild improvement in femur neck BMD compared with DMab alone. However, further research with a longer duration of TPTD treatment is warranted, as our findings lack statistical significance.

Impact of Length of Stay on Functional Outcomes of TBI Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 920-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Hawkins ◽  
F.D. Lewis ◽  
R.S. Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Inpatient Care ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of two groups of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) with attention to the impact of reduced length of stay (LOS) in the trauma center (TC) and rehabilitation hospital (RH). From 1991 to 1994, 55 patients, Group 1, with serious TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥3) were admitted to a level 1 TC and subsequently transferred to a comprehensive inpatient RH. These results have been previously published. From 1996 to 2002, 64 similarly injured patients, Group 2, received inpatient care at the same TC and RH. These patients had a marked decrease in length of stay. Functional Independence Measures (FIM) were obtained at admission (Adm), discharge (D/C), and at 1 year follow-up for both groups. The average length of stay at the TC dropped from 36 days in Group 1 to 26 days in Group 2. In addition, the average length of stay at the RH dropped from 46 days (Group 1) to 25 days (Group 2); overall, an average reduction of 31 days of inpatient care. Group 2 had significantly lower FIM scores at the time of RH discharge for self-care, locomotion, and mobility compared to Group 1. At the 1 year follow-up, however, there were no significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 in these FIM scores. FIM scores at 1 year were higher in Group 2 for communication (90% vs 71%) and social cognition (77% vs 49%) compared to Group 1. Over one-fourth of each group returned to work by the 1 year follow-up. Socially disruptive behavior occurred at least weekly in 28 per cent (Group 1) and 23 per cent (Group 2) of patients. The outcome for serious TBI is better than generally perceived. Reduction of inpatient LOS did not adversely affect the ultimate functional outcome. The decreased LOS placed a greater demand on outpatient rehabilitative services as well as a greater burden on the family of the brain-injured patient

P1031The impact of the duration of atrial fibrillation persistence for arrhythmia free survival in patients undergoing catheter ablation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Furukawa ◽  
T Yamada ◽  
T Morita ◽  
S Tamaki ◽  
M Kawasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Af Recurrence ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a curable treatment option. However, AF recurrence after CA remains an important problem. Although the success rate has been improved after catheter ablation (CA) in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF), outcome data after CA for persistent AF (PeAF) are highly variable. Previous studies showed the PeAF is one of independent predictors for AF recurrence in comparison to PAF. However, there are little information available on the prognostic significance of AF duration after CA for AF. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of AF duration on long-term outcomes of AF ablation in patients with PeAF compared with PAF. Methods We enrolled 778 consecutive patients, who were referred our institution between August 2015 and December 2017 for undergoing the first time CA for AF. We divided 5 groups (Group 1; PAF (n=442), Group 2; PeAF duration ≤6 months (n=198), Group 3; PeAF duration of 6 months to 2 years (n=87), Group 4; PeAF duration of 2–5 years (n=30) and Group 5; PeAF duration ≥5 years (n=21)). All patients followed up for at least 1 year. Outcome data on recurrence of AF after ablation were collected. Results There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics before CA among 5 groups, except for the prevalence of congestive heart failure, left atrial diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction. During a mean follow-up period of 511±298 days, 217 patients had AF recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that AF recurrence was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (31% vs 20%, p=0.002) and in group 4 compared to group 3 (83% vs 30%, p<0.0001). However, AF recurrence was no significantly differences between groups 2 and 3 (31% vs 30%, p=0.76) and between groups 4 and 5 (83% vs 81%, p=0.45). Of 217 patients with AF recurrence, 154 patients had undergone multiple procedures. After last procedures, during a mean follow-up period of 546±279 days, 61 patients had AF recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that AF recurrence was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (10% vs 3%, P=0.0005) and in group 4 compared with group 3 (35% vs 10%, p=0.0001). However, AF recurrence was no significantly difference between groups 2 and 3 (10% vs 10%, p=0.91) and between groups 4 and 5 (47% vs 35%, p=0.47). AF Free Survival Curve Conclusion Although patients with PeAF within 2 years had significantly higher AF recurrence compared to PAF, AF ablation might still be a good contributor as the first line approach to improve outcomes in patient with PeAF within 2 years.

Evaluation of the Impact of Three Different Pre-Transplant Strategies On the Outcome of Myeloma Patients Candidates to High-Dose Therapy.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1223-1223
Author(s):  
Alessandro Corso ◽  
Silvia Mangiacavalli ◽  
Luciana Barbarano ◽  
Annalisa Citro ◽  
Paola Brasca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Flow ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Dose Therapy ◽  
Oral Dexamethasone ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Abstract 1223 Poster Board I-245 Introduction This study aimed at evaluating the impact of three different pre-transplant therapies on the outcome of patients (pts) eligible for high-dose therapy. Methods two-hundred sixty eight newly diagnosed MM pts aged £65 years, Durie-Salmon stage III, II, or I in progression, were consecutively enrolled from 2000 to 2007 in three different protocols, with three different pre-transplant therapy: Group 1: (145 pts) 3 pulse-VAD cycles; Group 2: (67 pts) 3 pulse-VAD cycles plus 3 Thal-Dex cycles (thalidomide at the dose of 100 mg/day orally at bedtime, continuously for 3 months, oral dexamethasone at the dose of 20 mg on days 1-4 and 14-17 every 28 days); Group 3: (57pts) 4 Vel-Dex courses (Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, 11; oral Dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4 and 8-11 every 3 weeks). After induction all pts received two DCEP-short cycles as mobilization (oral Dexamethasone 40 mg/day on days 1-4 + Cyclophosphamide 700 mg/m2/day i.v., Etoposide 100 mg/ m2/day i.v., cisPlatin 25 mg/m2/day for 2 days) with peripheral blood stem-cell (PBSC) collection prompted by G-CSF followed by one or two transplants (Tx) with melphalan 200 mg/m2 as conditioning regimen. Response was defined according to IMWG uniform criteria. Pts were considered responsive when obtaining at least a PR. Results pts in the three group were similar for age, gender, Ig type, ISS stage. A significant higher percentage of Durie and Salmon stages III was found in group 3 (83% vs 68% in group 1 and 67% in group 2, p=0.0002). The median follow-up was 46 (1-150) months for group 1, 43 (1-68) months for group 2, and 29.7 (1-79) months for group 3. At the time of this analysis in the three groups 51%, 65%, 90% of transplanted pts respectively were still alive, and progression after transplant was registered in 84%, 80%, 50% respectively. Patient flow before Tx was similar (p=0.45): 19% in group 1, 27% in group 2, 23% in group 3. In group 1, 2% of pts went off-study after VAD, and 17% after mobilization phase. In group 2, patient flow was equally distributed: 7% after pulse VAD, 10% after thal-dex, 9% after DCEP. In group 3, 12% of the pts went off-study after Vel-Dex, 11% after DCEP. Table 1 summarized responses. In group 3 (Vel-Dex) response was better along all protocol phases with respect to group 1 or 2 (p<0.00001). The number of responsive pts progressively increased from 87% after Vel-Dex (CR 31%), to 96% after transplant (CR 38%). Response rates of group 1 and 2 patients were not significantly different either after induction (p=0.6), after DCEP (p=0.5), and after Tx (p=0.65). On intention to treat basis, vel-dex induction produced a better, although not significant, PFS (34.6 months vs 29 in group 1 and 26.8 in group 2, p=0.56). OS were not statistically different among the three groups, event though the different follow-up could affect the analysis (median OS 110 in group 1, 66 months in group 2, and not reached in group 3, p=0.37). In multivariate analysis PFS was improved only by the achievement of CR (p=0.001). No significant difference was observed between VGPR or PR (p=0.43). Conclusion In this study, only CR not VGPR impacts on the outcome. Vel-Dex producing a significant high CR rate after TX (38%), seems to improve survival of MM patients candidate to high-dose therapy with respect to conventional pre-transplant strategies. Disclosures Morra: Roche:.

Outcome of Patients Aged ≥60 After Allogeneic Hematopoietec Cell Transplantation: Age Has No Impact on Survival

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3540-3540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Federmann ◽  
Christoph Faul ◽  
Wichard Vogel ◽  
Lothar Kanz ◽  
Wolfgang A. Bethge
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Allogeneic Hct ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Abstract 3540 Historically, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been offered only to patients with good performance status and below the age of 60. However, the peak incidence of most hematologic malignancies is above 60 years of age. The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens enabled successful allogeneic HCT in patients with considerable comorbidities and older than 60 years. The impact of age on outcome of allogeneic HCT in patients ≥60 years has not been evaluated extensively. We retrospectively analyzed 109 consecutive patients (f=43, m=66) aged≥60 who received allogeneic HCT 2000–2010 at our institution. Median age of the patients was 65 years (range, 60–76). Patients were grouped in two cohorts depending on age: group 1 aged 60–65 years (n=60, median age=63) and group 2 aged 66–76 years (n=49, median age=68). Diagnoses were acute leukemia (AML n=65, ALL n=1), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=14), osteomyelofibrosis (n=7), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=9), multiple myeloma (n=8), aplastic anemia (n=1), chronic myeloid leukemia (n=2) and chronic lymphatic leukemia (n=2). At time of HCT, 41 of the patients were in complete remission (CR), 68 in partial remission (PR) (group 1: CR 21, PR 39; group 2: CR 20, PR 29) and 18 patients had a preceding HCT, 14 in group 1. Conditioning regimens were grouped in high (TBI/Bu+Cy, n=5, all group 1), intermediate (FLAMSA, Flu/Mel/BCNU, n=28, group 1=11, group 2=17), low (FLU+alkylans, n=48, group 1=32, group 2=16) and minimal (2GyTBI/Flu, n=28, group 1=12, group 2=16) intensity. Intermediate intensity conditioning was particularly used for high risk patients in PR (25/28). 22 patients were transplanted from matched related (MRD), 46 from matched unrelated (MUD) and 41 from mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 45% for all patients, 32% for group 1 and 62%, for group 2, respectively (p=0.02), with more patients with high risk constellation in group 1. 3-year OS for patients transplanted with MUD was 57%, with MMUD 46% vs. with MRD 0% (p=0.01). Non-relapse-mortality was 28% for all patients, 40% in group 1 and 12% in group 2, probably due to the higher intensity in conditioning in group 1. The outcomes with intermediate, low and minimal intensity conditioning were comparable, while all patients after high intensity conditioning died. Table 1 describes Kaplan-Meier estimated 3-year-OS and statistical univariate analysis by log-rank test in the different subgroups. Table 1. 3-year OS (in%) All Group 1 Age 60–65 Group 2 Age 66–76 Remission CR 52 p=0.25 31 p=0.76 77 p=0.15 PR 40 32 50 Conditioning high 0 p=0.5 0 p=0.08 – p=0.38 intermediate 52 50 53 low 48 43 57 minimal 45 17 67 Donor MRD 0 p=0.01 0 p=0.06 73 p=0.45 MUD 57 53 65 MMUD 46 40 33 GVHD acute no 18 p=0.003 13 p=0.008 33 p=0.27 ≥II 43 53 58 chronic no 39 p=0.25 36 p=0.70 52 p=0.08 limited 52 30 100 extensive 50 30 67 In group 1 the outcome of minimal conditioning was inferior compared to intermediate and low conditioning while patients in group 2 had a better outcome with minimal vs. low and intermediate conditioning. Incidences of acute GVHD ≥II, limited and extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) were 10%, 28% and 13%, respectively. In group 1, acute GVHD ≥II occurred in 13% and cGVHD in 35%, in group 2 in 5% and 41% of the patients, respectively. Acute GVHD ≥II was associated with inferior outcome (3-year OS of 18% vs. 43%, p=0.003) while cGVHD had a positive impact on OS. In group 2 patients with limited cGVHD showed better 3-year OS than patients without cGVHD (67% vs. 52%, p=0.12). Age alone had no major impact on outcome of allogeneic HCT. Patients aged ≥60 seemed to benefit from the use of MUD rather than an older MRD. Chronic GVHD had a positive influence on survival. Our data indicate that the regimen used should be tailored to disease risk and patient performance status. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Carboplatin, ifosfamide, and mesna (CIM) for the treatment of gynecological carcinosarcoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16539-e16539
Author(s):  
N. Walji ◽  
A. Zachariah ◽  
C. Yap ◽  
S. A. Hussain ◽  
C. J. Poole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Response ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
The Common ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Abdominal Irradiation ◽  
Toxicity Criteria ◽  
Group 1

e16539 Background: A GOG trial comparing cisplatin/ifosfamide/mesna chemotherapy versus whole abdominal irradiation for FIGO stages I-IV carcinosarcoma (CS) showed an estimated median survival (MS) of 50 months for chemotherapy but high toxicity. This study investigates the efficacy and tolerability of a novel regimen using carboplatin AUC 5, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 and mesna 1 g/m2 (CIM) in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Methods: Retrospective analysis of women with CS treated from May 1997-May 2007 with CIM (group 1) versus other chemotherapy regimens (group 2). Toxicity was graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria and MS estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 51 eligible women (median age 71 years) 35 (69%) had stage 3 or 4 disease. 35/51 (69%) received chemotherapy; 2 with stage 1c disease received pelvic radiotherapy (pRT) alone whilst the remaining 14 were unfit for any treatment. Median follow-up for the treated patients is 45 months. 11/35 patients (31%) received CIM as first-line chemotherapy. Other regimens included: carboplatin (n = 14); carboplatin/paclitaxel (n = 3); carboplatin/epirubicin (n = 3); carboplatin/doxorubicin (n = 2); doxorubicin/ifosfamide (n = 1); cisplatin/ifosfamide (n = 1). 20/35 (57%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) of which 8 received CIM; 11/20 patients also received adjuvant pRT. MS in the CIM AC group is 54.7 months compared to 37.4 months for other regimens. 3/8 patients (37.5%) in the CIM arm developed recurrent disease compared to 9/12 (75%) for other regimens. 4/16 patients received CIM as first- or second-line palliative chemotherapy. All patients responded of whom 2 achieved clinical and radiological complete response (CR). One woman subsequently relapsed and achieved a second CR with CIM. MS for all chemotherapy-treated patients is 54.7 months (group 1) versus 20.6 months (group 2) (p = 0.07). No patients in group 1 experienced any grade 3/4 toxicity and all patients completed the prescribed treatment. There were 2 unexpected treatment-related deaths in group 2, one of whom received carboplatin/paclitaxel and the other carboplatin/epirubicin. Conclusions: CIM appears to be efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of CS and merits further investigation in clinical trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals The Role of the Psychooncology Team in the Multidisciplinary Team Management of Breast Cancer Patients - From Diagnosis to After Treatment: A Qualitative Study at MISR Cancer Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 114s-114s
Author(s):  
I. Sallam ◽  
G. Amira ◽  
A. Youssri
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Team Management ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Background: According to the cultural and socioeconomic factors, breast cancer patients (BCP) experienced a relatively low health-related quality of life (Qol) during the journey of breast cancer treatment, that influence patient adaptation to the situation from diagnosis to after treatment. And the further effect on either starting the treatment or its continuation. This merited conducting a qualitative study to explore the importance of the psychooncological approach to BCP and the impact on commencing and continuation of treatment and follow-up. Aim: To describe the impact and importance of the psychooncology team in the cancer center and the effect of their approach on the BCP's Qol. Methods: The study involved 114 interviewed participants, excluding patients with wide variety of chronic illnesses, only 91 patients are the focused study group. Of which 11 patients group (1) refused to join the psychooncological approach due to cultural, and socioeconomic issues, and 80 patients group (2) joined and followed up by the team. Both groups are regularly surveyed. Qualitative and quantitative measurements were used. Data were collected as follows, at time of diagnosis, after surgery and after chemo-radiation therapies from group (1) and for group (2) after the psychooncology team management and care. Developing the psychooncology team for the cancer center. 2 psychooncologists, 5 psychoeducating nurses and a group therapy sessions at a world standard levels of care with ethics committee approvals, and caring for patients' privacy. Close follow-up and evaluation of the performance and Qol of our BCP, raising the awareness about psychoeducation and psychological approach importance for BCP that would help them cope with daily life challenges to improve Qol. Results: Category Group N. Diagnosis related depression N. Surgery related depression N. Treatment related depression Free of depression Group (1) No= 11 3 (27%) 2 (18%) 5 (45%) 1 (10%) Group (2) No= 80 12 (15%) 9 (11.3%) 23 (28.7%) 36 (45%) Conclusion: Results indicate that the most critical depressing points is at time of diagnosis and chemo-radiation therapy. Group (2) has positive indication and alternation on the level of Qol and a significant improvement on level of depression when compared with group (1). This study highlighted the importance of psychooncology team in BCPs' survivorship. It also brings to attention the important role of the government, health policy makers and health plans toward enriching all cancer centers with the psychooncology team. To maximize health and health care for BCP.

P1962Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy duration on clinical outcome after stent implantation for coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the Euro Bifurcation Club - P2BiTO - registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Di Serafino ◽  
H Gamra ◽  
P Cirillo ◽  
M Zimarino ◽  
I J Amat-Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) following Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) or Stable Coronary Artery Disease (SCAD) treated with coronary stenting is still debated. Although current guidelines consider several “clinical” criteria to decide for short DAPT (<6 months), standard DAPT (12 months) and prolonged DAPT (>12 months), the relationship between DAPT duration, treatment of bifurcations and its impact on clinical outcome has been poorly investigated in real world registries. Purpose We evaluated the impact of DAPT duration on clinical outcomes in consecutive all-comers patients treated with stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions included in the Euro Bifurcation Club -P2BiTO - registry. Methods Data on 5036 consecutive patients who underwent PCI on coronary bifurcation at 17 major coronary intervention centres between January 2012 and December 2014 were collected. The primary endpoint of the study was the cumulative occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACCE), defined as a composite of overall-death death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stroke during the follow-up; the secondary endpoints were the single occurrence of any of the above mentioned events. Results Data on DAPT duration was available for 3992 patients (79%). Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1) DAPT <6-months (n=720); Group 2) DAPT >6-months but <12-month (n=1602); Group 3) DAPT >12-months (n=1670). Follow up was completed in 3935 (98%) patients with a median of 20 months (C.I.=12–28). At 24 months after the index procedure, MACCE occurred more frequently in the DAPT <6-month group (Group 1) as compared with both Group 2 and 3 (respectively, 102 (14%) versus 154 (10%) and 164 (10%), HR: 0.72 (0.64–0.82), p<0.001). This difference remains after adjustment for clinical and angiographic characteristics (HR: 0.66 (0.58–0.77), p<0.001). On the contrary, no significant difference was found between Group 2 and Group 3 patients. At the Kaplan-Meier analysis (Figure 1), freedom from MACCE survival was significantly lower in patients receiving DAPT for less than 6 months (Log-Rank: 29.5, p<0.001). Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves Conclusions In the P2BiTO registry, short DAPT duration of less than 6 months was associated with a significantly higher risk of MACCE compared to longer DAPT in a real-world registry of patients treated for coronary artery bifurcation stenosis.

Expression of P-selectin, von Willebrand and endothelin-1 after carotid artery stenting

VASA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xia ◽  
Yang ◽  
Qu ◽  
Cheng ◽  
Wang
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Endothelin 1 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
One Year ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Background: This study was designed to investigate the impact of carotid artery stenting (CAS) on plasma levels of P-selectin, von Willebrand (vWF) and endothelin-1. Patients and methods: Sixty-seven patients who received CAS were divided into group 1 (one stent for a simple lesion, n = 38) and group 2 (two stents for complex lesions, n = 29). The levels of P-selectin, vWF and endothelin-1 were measured before CAS, 1 h, 6h, 24 h and 2 weeks after the stenting. Results: Sixty-one patients completed one-year follow up. Restenosis was noted in 14 (23 %) patients, among these three (4.8 %) had a restenosis of > 50 % of the vascular lumen. In all patients, the levels of P-selectin, vWF and endothelin-1 increased immediately after CAS (P < 0.05 or < 0.01). The levels of vWF and endothelin-1 in group 2 were higher than in group 1 (P < 0.05 or 0.01). There was no significant difference in P-selectin and endothelin-1 between the restenosis and non-restenosis group (P > 0.05). The 24 h vWF in patients with restenosis were higher than in non-restenosis group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: CAS results in a significant increase in plasma P-selectin, vWF and endothelin-1. The post-CAS levels of P-selectin, vWF and endothelin-1 are related to the extent of endothelial injury. Whether they are associated with restenosis 12 months after the treatment requires further investigation.

Do pancreas cancer stem cells play crucial role in survival outcome?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15721-e15721
Author(s):  
Gokce Askan ◽  
Ibrahim Halil Sahin ◽  
Marinela Capanu ◽  
Mesruh Turkekul ◽  
Kenneth H. Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cancer Stem Cells ◽  
Lung Metastasis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Survival Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

e15721 Background: Recent studies indicate that pancreatic cancer stem cells (CSC) may predict disease behavior and survival outcomes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) patients (pts). Several CSC markers have been reported in PDAC (Fitzgerald, TL, 2014). We herein evaluated the impact of CSC markers including CD44 and Epithelial Specific Antigen (ESA) on survival outcome of PDAC pts who had liver or lung metastasis after initial surgical resection (IR). Methods: Clinicopathologic features and survival of 59 PDACs were analyzed. Pts with IRB approval, and whom had available primary tumor tissue, were included. All neoplasms were immuno labeled with CD44 and ESA. Staining intensity was scored as weak (1), moderate (2), strong (3), while the staining pattern was scored as: few (1), patchy (2), and diffuse (3). The expression for CD44 and ESA was accepted positive if total score ≥4. Time from relapse to death (TRD) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method censoring patients that were alive at the last follow up. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test Results: Of 59 pts, 42 (71 %) had liver, 10 (17%) had lung and 7 (12%) had both liver and lung metastasis. M/F = 34/25; mean age = 64.2 (range, 34-90). Patients were subcategorized as follows; thirteen cases were CD44 (+)/ESA (-) (group1) and 13 were CD44 (-)/ESA (+) (group 2). Eight (61.5%) of group 1 tumors and 2 (15.3%) of group 2 were poorly differentiated. At last follow-up, except one with 63 months survival, all pts died of disease with 23.3 months (range, 3-67) median OS. No significant difference in TRD was observed between group 1 (6.9 months) and 2 (13.8 months) (p = 0.62). However, we observed group 1 tumors had worse OS (12 months) compared to group 2 (36 months). Conclusions:A worse outcome trend was observed for pts with CD44 (+)/ESA (-), albeit not statistically significant and likely limited by small numbers. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the robustness of this observation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document