Phase II trial of volasertib (BI 6727) versus chemotherapy (CT) in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer (OC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5504-5504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Pujade-Lauraine ◽  
Beatrice E. Weber ◽  
Isabelle Ray-Coquard ◽  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
Frédéric Selle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Platinum Refractory

5504 Background: Volasertib (V) is a potent and selective cell cycle kinase inhibitor that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis by targeting Polo-like kinases. This study investigated V vs CT as 3rd- or 4th-line therapy in patients (pts) with platinum-refractory or resistant OC. Methods: Pts were randomized to V 300 mg IV Q3W or investigator’s choice single-agent CT (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, paclitaxel, gemcitabine) until progression or intolerance. Primary endpoint was 24-wk disease control rate (DCR; % of pts with complete/partial response [PR] or stable disease [SD]). Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), best overall response (RECIST 1.1) and explorative biomarkers. Results: 109 pts received V (n=54) or CT (n = 55) for a median (range) of 95 (22–716) and 114 (7–351) days, respectively. Demographic data were balanced between the treatment arms. Overall, median age was 62.0 yr; ECOG PS 0–1: 103 pts; 2 prior CTs: 51 pts; ≥3 prior CTs: 57 pts; platinum-resistant: 78 pts; platinum-refractory: 31 pts; measurable disease: 89 pts. 24-wk DCR (95% CI) for V vs CT was 31% (18–43) vs 43% (30–57), and median PFS was 13.1 vs 20.6 wks (HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.66–1.53). Six V pts vs 0 CT pts are ongoing for PFS 1 yr after randomization. Best overall response in pts with measurable disease (V/CT) was: PR, 7/8 pts; SD, 24/24 pts. Adverse events (AEs) led to discontinuation in 20 pts (V, n = 5; CT, n = 15); no V pts and 8 CT pts discontinued due to treatment-related AEs (including neuropathy in 3 CT pts). Most frequent all grade AEs (% of pts) regardless of relatedness were neutropenia (61%), anemia (54%), thrombocytopenia (46%), nausea (37%) and asthenia (33%) with V, and asthenia/nausea (47% each), abdominal pain (38%), anemia (36%) and neutropenia/vomiting (31% each) with CT. There were 3 fatal AEs per arm. Conclusions: Single-agent V showed antitumor activity in OC in a range similar to CT. AEs with V were mainly hematologic and manageable, with fewer non-hematologic AEs than CT. Exploration of potential predictive biomarkers for V activity is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01121406.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2811-2818 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Mutch ◽  
Mauro Orlando ◽  
Tiana Goss ◽  
Michael G. Teneriello ◽  
Alan N. Gordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
End Points ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose Ovarian cancer (OC) patients experiencing progressive disease (PD) within 6 months of platinum-based therapy in the primary setting are considered platinum resistant (Pt-R). Currently, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is a standard of care for treatment of recurrent Pt-R disease. On the basis of promising phase II results, gemcitabine was compared with PLD for efficacy and safety in taxane-pretreated Pt-R OC patients. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 195) with Pt-R OC were randomly assigned to either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8; every 21 days) or PLD 50 mg/m2 (day 1; every 28 days) until PD or undue toxicity. Optional cross-over therapy was allowed at PD or at withdrawal because of toxicity. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Additional end points included tumor response, time to treatment failure, survival, and quality of life. Results In the gemcitabine and PLD groups, median PFS was 3.6 v 3.1 months; median overall survival was 12.7 v 13.5 months; overall response rate (ORR) was 6.1% v 8.3%; and in the subset of patients with measurable disease, ORR was 9.2% v 11.7%, respectively. None of the efficacy end points showed a statistically significant difference between treatment groups. The PLD group experienced significantly more hand-foot syndrome and mucositis; the gemcitabine group experienced significantly more constipation, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and neutropenia but not febrile neutropenia. Conclusion Although this was not designed as an equivalency study, gemcitabine and PLD seem to have a comparable therapeutic index in this population of Pt-R taxane-pretreated OC patients. Single-agent gemcitabine may be an acceptable alternative to PLD for patients with Pt-R OC.

Volasertib Versus Chemotherapy in Platinum-Resistant or -Refractory Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Groupe des Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers de l'Ovaire Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 706-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Pujade-Lauraine ◽  
Frédéric Selle ◽  
Béatrice Weber ◽  
Isabelle-Laure Ray-Coquard ◽  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Volasertib is a potent and selective cell-cycle kinase inhibitor that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis by targeting Polo-like kinase. This phase II trial evaluated volasertib or single-agent chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory ovarian cancer who experienced failure after treatment with two or three therapy lines. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive either volasertib 300 mg by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or an investigator’s choice of single-agent, nonplatinum, cytotoxic chemotherapy. The primary end point was 24-week disease control rate. Secondary end points included best overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), safety, quality of life, and exploratory biomarker analyses. Results Of the 109 patients receiving treatment, 54 received volasertib and 55 received chemotherapy; demographics were well balanced. The 24-week disease control rates for volasertib and chemotherapy were 30.6% (95% CI, 18.0% to 43.2%) and 43.1% (95% CI, 29.6% to 56.7%), respectively, with partial responses in seven (13.0%) and eight (14.5%) patients, respectively. Median PFS was 13.1 weeks and 20.6 weeks for volasertib and chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.53). Six patients (11%) receiving volasertib achieved PFS fore more than 1 year, whereas no patient receiving chemotherapy achieved PFS greater than 1 year. No relationship between the expression of the biomarkers tested and their response was determined. Patients treated with volasertib experienced more grade 3 and 4 drug-related hematologic adverse events (AEs) and fewer nonhematologic AEs than did patients receiving chemotherapy. Discontinuation resulting from AEs occurred in seven (13.0%) and 15 (27.3%) patients in the volasertib and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Both arms showed similar effects on quality of life. Conclusion Single-agent volasertib showed antitumor activity in patients with ovarian cancer. AEs in patients receiving volasertib were mainly hematologic and manageable.

scholarly journals Predictive Biomarkers and Patient Outcome in Platinum-Resistant (PLD-Treated) Ovarian Cancer

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 525
Author(s):  
Isabel J. Dionísio de Sousa ◽  
Durval S. Marques ◽  
Catarina Príncipe ◽  
Raquel V. Portugal ◽  
Sule Canberk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Vimentin Expression ◽  
Resistant Refractory ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Prognostic Implications ◽  
E Cadherin

Identification of predictive biomarkers for ovarian cancer (OC) treatment, particularly in the platinum-resistant/refractory setting, is highly relevant for clinical management. E-cadherin, vimentin, and osteopontin (OPN) are proteins associated with tumor microenvironment (TME) remodelling that play key roles in cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the staining patterns of these proteins with survival outcomes in a series of OC patients, namely in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory disease. Low E-cadherin expression and high vimentin expression in all patient groups (as well as for E-cadherin in the platinum-resistant arm) were significantly associated with longer overall survival (OS). Low cytoplasmic OPN expression (and cytoplasmic and membrane OPN in the platinum-resistant arm) were significantly associated with longer OS. In patients that responded to treatment (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or other), low cytoplasmic OPN expression was also associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS). In the other hand, high nuclear OPN-c expression in patients that respond to treatment was associated with longer OS and longer PFS. Longer PFS was also associated with high expression of both nuclear and cytoplasm OPN-c, in platinum-resistant patients and in those that responded to PLD. Our study indicates that the expression of E-cadherin, vimentin, and OPN may have prognostic implications. Nuclear OPN-c and cytoplasm OPN expression are putative predictive markers in platinum-resistant (PLD treated) ovarian cancer patients.

Randomized Phase III Study of Canfosfamide in Combination With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Alone in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 772-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
Neil J. Finkler ◽  
James B. Hall ◽  
Ostap Melnyk ◽  
Robert P. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Platinum Refractory

Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of canfosfamide in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (OC).Methods:Patients with platinum-refractory or -resistant (primary or secondary) OC were randomized to receive canfosfamide at 1000 mg/m2 and PLD at 50 mg/m2 intravenously or PLD alone at 50 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 28 days until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Other end points were objective response rate and safety. The study was originally planned for 244 patients. The trial was temporarily placed on hold after 125 patients were randomized while the results of another trial were being reviewed and the sponsor decided not to resume enrollment. The interim analysis became the final analysis.Results:The median PFS was 5.6 months for canfosfamide + PLD (n = 65) versus 3.7 months for PLD (n = 60) (hazards ratio, 0.92; P = 0.7243). A preplanned subgroup analysis showed that 75 patients with platinum-refractory or primary platinum-resistant OC had a median PFS of 5.6 months for canfosfamide + PLD versus 2.9 months for PLD (hazards ratio, 0.55; P = 0.0425). Hematologic adverse events were 66% on the canfosfamide + PLD arm versus 44% on the PLD arm, manageable with dose reductions. Nonhematologic adverse events were similar for both arms. The incidence of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and stomatitis was lower on canfosfamide + PLD (23%, 31%, respectively) versus (39%, 49%, respectively) on PLD.Conclusions:Overall median PFS showed a positive trend but was not statistically significant. The median PFS in the platinum-refractory and primary platinum-resistant OC patients was significantly longer for canfosfamide + PLD versus PLD. Canfosfamide may ameliorate the palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and stomatitis known to be associated with PLD. Further study of this active well-tolerated regimen in platinum-refractory and primary platinum-resistant OC is planned.This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00350948.

scholarly journals A Machine Learning Decision Support System (DSS) for Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Treated with Somatostatin Analog (SSA) Therapy

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 804
Author(s):  
Jasminka Hasic Telalovic ◽  
Serena Pillozzi ◽  
Rachele Fabbri ◽  
Alice Laffi ◽  
Daniele Lavacchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Site ◽  
Somatostatin Analog ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Classification Models ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Bayes Algorithm

The application of machine learning (ML) techniques could facilitate the identification of predictive biomarkers of somatostatin analog (SSA) efficacy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We collected data from 74 patients with a pancreatic or gastrointestinal NET who received SSA as first-line therapy. We developed three classification models to predict whether the patient would experience a progressive disease (PD) after 12 or 18 months based on clinic-pathological factors at the baseline. The dataset included 70 samples and 15 features. We initially developed three classification models with accuracy ranging from 55% to 70%. We then compared ten different ML algorithms. In all but one case, the performance of the Multinomial Naïve Bayes algorithm (80%) was the highest. The support vector machine classifier (SVC) had a higher performance for the recall metric of the progression-free outcome (97% vs. 94%). Overall, for the first time, we documented that the factors that mainly influenced progression-free survival (PFS) included age, the number of metastatic sites and the primary site. In addition, the following factors were also isolated as important: adverse events G3–G4, sex, Ki67, metastatic site (liver), functioning NET, the primary site and the stage. In patients with advanced NETs, ML provides a predictive model that could potentially be used to differentiate prognostic groups and to identify patients for whom SSA therapy as a single agent may not be sufficient to achieve a long-lasting PFS.

scholarly journals The role of abemaciclib in treatment of advanced breast cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 175883591877692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia McCartney ◽  
Erica Moretti ◽  
Giuseppina Sanna ◽  
Marta Pestrin ◽  
Emanuela Risi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Until recently, the mainstay of treatment in the majority of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) has consisted of single-agent endocrine therapy (ET). However, as understanding of endocrine resistance has grown, newer targeted agents have come to the fore. Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase complexes 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) combined with ET has shown significant activity in HR+ HER2− ABC, with impressive results in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) when compared with ET alone. This review summarizes the seminal findings pertaining to CDK4/6 inhibition in this population, specifically focusing on abemaciclib, contrasted with palbociclib and ribociclib. Potential directions for future studies are discussed, as a way of addressing outstanding issues such as establishing optimal treatment sequencing and agent combinations, appropriate patient selection to derive maximal benefits, predictive biomarkers and the employment of CDK4/6 inhibition beyond the ABC setting.

Single-arm phase II study of low-dose paclitaxel and pembrolizumab in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 433-433
Author(s):  
Rhonda L. Bitting ◽  
Donald Charles Vile ◽  
Janet A. Tooze ◽  
Christopher Y. Thomas ◽  
Morgan Neve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Platinum Refractory

433 Background: Single agent checkpoint inhibition is effective in a small proportion of platinum-refractory UC patients but improvements are needed. UC is highly inflammatory, and low-dose chemotherapy may enhance the response to immunotherapy. We evaluated whether combination therapy with low-dose paclitaxel and pembrolizumab is more efficacious than single-agent pembrolizumab which had an objective response rate (ORR) of 21% in a similar patient population in the KEYNOTE-045 study. We also incorporated multiple novel biomarker studies to explore immune regulatory mechanisms in UC. Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm phase II trial (NCT02581982) of pembrolizumab combined with low-dose paclitaxel in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic UC. Key inclusion criteria included measurable progression of disease within 12 months of platinum therapy and ECOG ≤1. Patients received pembrolizumab 200mg day 1 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle for up to 8 cycles unless clinical or radiographic disease progression or unacceptable adverse events (AEs) were observed. Responding patients could remain on pembrolizumab maintenance for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was ORR; key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), 6-month progression free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: Twenty-seven patients were treated between 4/2016 - 6/2020, with a median follow up of 9.9 months. At baseline, the median age was 68 years (range 49-80), with 81% men and 78% non-Hispanic white. The majority (59%) were ECOG 1. Twenty-one of 27 (78%) received prior definitive therapy: chemoradiation in 24% and surgery in 76%. The majority (78%) of patients received prior cisplatin. 70% progressed on a cisplatin-based regimen while 30% progressed on carboplatin-based regimen within 12 months of study entry. The ORR by intention to treat was 9 of 27 patients (33%) and in patients evaluable for response by imaging was 9 of 25 (36%), including 3 with complete response. Disease control rate in evaluable patients was 72%. Six-month PFS was 46.8% (95% CI: 27.2%, 64.2%) and median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI: 8.7 mo, NR). Common ≥ grade 2 AEs were anemia (44%), lymphopenia (37%), hyperglycemia (33%), and fatigue (33%). Possible treatment-related at least grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 56% of subjects, including 2 immune-mediated AEs (pneumonitis and nephritis) resulting in therapy cessation but a durable partial response. There were no grade 5 events. Conclusions: This study illustrates that the addition of low-dose paclitaxel to pembrolizumab improves outcomes in patients with platinum-refractory UC, relative to single-agent pembrolizumab. No unanticipated safety signals emerged. Exploratory analyses including PDL1 status, tumor mutational burden, and change in circulating microRNAs and in immune cell populations are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02581982.

Response to selpercatinib versus prior systemic therapy in patients (pts) with RET fusion+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9032-9032
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Drilon ◽  
Oliver Gautschi ◽  
Benjamin Besse ◽  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Daniel Shao-Weng Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Systemic Therapies

9032 Background: Selpercatinib, a first-in-class highly selective, potent, CNS-active RET kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for treatment of RET fusion+ lung or thyroid cancers. Selpercatinib demonstrated durable antitumor activity in previously treated pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC in an ongoing Phase 1/2 trial, LIBRETTO-001 (Besse et al., ASCO 2021). Methods: Pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC enrolled in the global, multicenter, LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128; 16 countries, 89 sites). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, and safety. This post-hoc intrapatient analysis was based on a 30 March 2020 data cutoff date. Historical physician-reported best overall response (BOR) from last systemic therapy received prior to enrollment was compared with selpercatinib BOR by independent review committee per RECIST v1.1, with each patient serving as his/her own control. Results: In efficacy-evaluable pts (N = 218) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo), median pt age was 61 years, the majority with ECOG of 0/1 (37%/61%), with a median of 2 (range: 1-15) prior systemic therapies. Overall, 57% of patients responded to selpercatinib while 16% responded to the immediate prior therapy. ORR improvements with selpercatinib were observed regardless of prior therapy: chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (57% vs 14%), single-agent ICI (48% vs 3%), or chemotherapy (58% vs 15%). A total of 108 patients (49%) did not respond to immediate prior therapy but responded to selpercatinib. Fewer patients had progressive disease as their BOR with selpercatinib (2%) compared to the immediate prior therapy (28%). The median duration of therapy for selpercatinib was notably extended compared with that of the immediate prior therapy (11.8 vs. 3.4 months, respectively). Conclusions: In pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC treated on LIBRETTO-001, systemic therapies administered prior to enrollment achieved less meaningful clinical benefit than selpercatinib. Selpercatinib demonstrated consistent efficacy regardless of the type of prior therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128.

Subgroup analysis of rucaparib versus chemotherapy as treatment for BRCA-mutated, advanced, relapsed ovarian carcinoma: Effect of platinum sensitivity in the randomized, phase 3 study ARIEL4.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5517-5517
Author(s):  
Amit M. Oza ◽  
Alla Sergeevna Lisyanskaya ◽  
Alexander A. Fedenko ◽  
Mikhail Dvorkin ◽  
Andreia Cristina de Melo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitivity ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

5517 Background: In ARIEL4 (NCT02855944), rucaparib significantly improved the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy (CT) in patients with advanced, relapsed ovarian carcinoma (OC) harboring a deleterious BRCA1/2 (BRCA) mutation (median PFS 7.4 [95% CI 7.3–9.1] vs 5.7 [5.5–7.3] months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.64 [95% CI 0.49–0.84]; P=0.001). This prespecified exploratory analysis investigated the effect of platinum sensitivity on the efficacy of rucaparib vs CT in ARIEL4. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to oral rucaparib 600 mg twice daily or CT and stratified based on progression-free interval (≥1 to <6 months = platinum resistant; ≥6 to <12 months = partially platinum sensitive; ≥12 months = fully platinum sensitive). In the CT group, patients with platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive disease received weekly paclitaxel 60–80 mg/m2; patients with fully platinum-sensitive disease received investigator’s choice of platinum-based CT (single-agent carboplatin or cisplatin, or platinum doublet). Patients could crossover from CT to rucaparib following radiologic disease progression. Efficacy endpoints were explored in patients with a confirmed BRCA mutation (patients with a reversion mutation were excluded), based on the randomization strata of platinum sensitivity. Results: The visit cutoff date was September 30, 2020. PFS and objective response rates (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 for rucaparib vs CT across subgroups are presented in the Table. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the rucaparib group were anemia/decreased hemoglobin (platinum-resistant patients: rucaparib 47% vs CT 40%; partially platinum-sensitive patients: 63% vs 27%; fully platinum-sensitive patients: 58% vs 20%) and nausea (52% vs 21%; 51% vs 23%; 60% vs 68%). In the intent-to-treat population, 74/116 (64%) patients in the CT group crossed over to receive rucaparib: 39/59 (66%) with platinum-resistant, 25/31 (81%) with partially platinum-sensitive, and 10/26 (38%) with fully platinum-sensitive disease. Conclusions: Results from this exploratory subgroup analysis suggest that rucaparib is a reasonable treatment option for heavily pretreated patients across all platinum sensitivity subgroups. Safety was consistent with prior rucaparib studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02855944. [Table: see text]

Phase II Study of Bevacizumab in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer or Peritoneal Serous Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (33) ◽  
pp. 5180-5186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Cannistra ◽  
Ursula A. Matulonis ◽  
Richard T. Penson ◽  
Julie Hambleton ◽  
Jakob Dupont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Wall Thickening ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Resistant

Purpose We evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) or peritoneal serous carcinoma (PSC) who had experienced disease progression during, or within 3 months of discontinuing, topotecan or liposomal doxorubicin. Patients and Methods No more than three prior treatment regimens were allowed. Patients received single-agent bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. Response was assessed by computed tomography (CT) scan every 6 weeks using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Results Of 44 patients treated, 83.7% were primarily platinum resistant, 59.1% had received liposomal doxorubicin, 25% topotecan, 15.9% both agents, and 47.7% had received three prior chemotherapy regimens. A median of five (range, two to 16) bevacizumab doses were administered. Partial responses were observed in seven patients (15.9%). Median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.1 to 5.5 months), with a median survival duration of 10.7 months at study termination. Bevacizumab-associated grade 3 to 4 events included hypertension (9.1%), proteinuria (15.9%), bleeding (2.3%), and wound-healing complications (2.3%). The incidence of GI perforation (GIP; 11.4%) was higher than reported in bevacizumab trials of other tumor types. GIP occurred in 23.8% of patients receiving three prior chemotherapy regimens, compared with 0% of patients receiving two prior chemotherapy regimens (P < .01). A trend toward higher risk of GIP was observed for patients with bowel wall thickening or bowel obstruction on CT scan. Arterial thromboembolic events occurred in three patients (6.8%). Three deaths were related to bevacizumab treatment. Conclusion Bevacizumab has single-agent activity in patients with platinum-resistant EOC or PSC. A higher than expected incidence of GIP was noted in these heavily pretreated patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document