How oncologists adhere to evidence-based G-CSF-guidelines to prevent febrile neutropenia: A sample survey in hospitals and practices in Germany.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6591-6591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut Link ◽  
Josef Nietsch ◽  
Markus Kerkmann ◽  
Petra Angelika Ortner ◽  

6591 Background: Primary G-CSF prophylaxis after chemotherapy is recommended in evidence based guidelines (GL), if the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) is high (≥20%), or intermediate (≥ 10% - 20%) in case of risk factors. The aim was to evaluate, if G-CSF is used as proposed by GL, to identify determinants of GL implementation and adherence. Methods: The sample size was calculated at 2% of the incidence of malignant lymphoma, breast and lung cancer in Germany. Pts who had received 3-9 cycles of chemotherapy with a FN risk ≥10% between 5/2011 to 4/2012 were documented retrospectively. Results: 286 lymphoma, 666 lung cancer and 976 breast cancer pts were collected from 87 hospitals and 59 oncology practices with 195 physicians participating. Adherence to GL was higher in physicians up to 10 than over 10 years of experience. Conclusions: The adherence to and acceptance of GL for G-CSF may not be sufficient. Patient risk factors are underestimated therefore resulting in a possible underuse of G-CSF. Physicians may underestimate FN risk in pts who have an intermediate risk of FN and they overestimate their adherence to the GL. [Table: see text]

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam K Stanley ◽  
Ashton Barnett-Vanes ◽  
Matthew J Reed

Over a billion Peripheral Intra-Venous Cannulas (PIVC) are used globally every year with at least 25 million sold annually in the UK.1,2 The NHS spends an estimated £29m of its annual acute sector budget on PIVC procurement3 and around 70% of all hospitalised patients require at least one PIVC during their stay.4 Despite their extensive and routine use, PIVC failure rates are reported as high as 50-69%.5-7 In addition, many PIVCs remain unused following insertion, particularly in the Emergency Department (ED).8,9 The risk factors for PIVC failure are not well understood and the literature has found extensive regional variation in practice when it comes to PIVC insertion and management.1,7,10 While various technologies have been developed to address these issues, there remains a need for standardised, evidence-based guidelines.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6089-6089 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. I. Mayordomo ◽  
A. López ◽  
N. Viñolas ◽  
J. Castellanos ◽  
S. Pernas ◽  
...  

6089 Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN), a dose-limiting event for many myelosuppressive chemotherapy (CT) regimens, often causes subsequent CT dose delays (DD) and reductions (DR), lengthens hospital stay and increases monitoring, diagnostic and treatment costs. No studies are known to date on economic costs of FN in common clinical practice in Spain. Methods: This is a multicentre, retrospective, observational chart review of adult patients with breast cancer, lung cancer or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) who suffered from at least one FN episode related to cytotoxic CT from 16 Spanish hospitals. Resource use and subsequent costs including days of hospitalization, number of RBC transfusions, number and type of complementary tests, use of colony-stimulating factors (CSF), antibiotics and other drugs to manage FN were assessed. Potential impact of FN on planned CT dose and/or schedule was also analysed. P-value was obtained by one-way ANOVA using the Bonferroni correction. Results: A total of 194 medical charts including 238 documented FN episodes were reviewed. Women, 59.8%; age > 60 yrs, 49.5%; breast cancer, 43% (83% treated with taxane or anthracycline-based CT); lung cancer, 22% (95.5% treated with platinum-based CT); NHL, 35% (58.2% treated with CHOP-like CT). Hospitalization due to FN lasted a median of 7 days. During the episode, 32.3% of pts needed 1 or more RBC transfusions, 97.9% required a blood test and 87% a blood culture. CSFs were used in 67.6% of pts. All pts were treated with antibiotics and 78.2% with other drugs. 58.4% of FN episodes had an impact on planned CT dose and/or schedule: DR was observed in 34.9% of cases, DD in 28% and CT withdrawal in 14.7%. Conclusions: Main drivers of cost of FN are hospitalization and antibiotic treatment. FN is more costly in NHL pts than breast or lung pts (statistically significant in lung pts). FN episodes have a relevant impact on planned CT dose and/or schedule. In each row statistically significant differences ( p<0.05) were obtained between values with the same letter. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette Ward ◽  
Glenys Rikard-Bell

We conducted interviews with 85 randomly selected general practitioners (GPs) in Central Sydney to examine patterns of referral of women with breast cancer, satisfaction with local services, awareness of evidence-based guidelines and suggestions for local support.Previous experience was the most frequently cited factor influencing choice of specialist (n=80, 94%)followed by personal knowledge of the consultant's expertise (n=72, 85%). Only one third of respondents agreed women wanted to be more involved in choosing the specialist (n=28, 33%). Of 79 women recently diagnosed with breast cancer, the majority (96%) had been referred to a male surgeon (n=71, 96%).While only 35% of the GPs rated the care received by women with breast cancer in local facilities as 'excellent', significantly fewer rated communication between GPs and specialists as 'excellent' (35% v19%, p<0.01). Younger GPs were less likely to rate communication as 'excellent' compared with GPs aged 55 years or older (p=0.01). Only 18% of GPs considered their patients as having been 'very well informed' about their treatment choices. Younger GPs were more likely than older GPs to recall all available breast cancer guidelines (p=0.02). Significantly more GPs (68%) requested seminars with experts than any other types of educational support (p<0.001).To improve outcomes for women with breast cancer, mechanisms to support communication between GPs and specialists are recommended. Seminars for GPs with experts who emphasize evidence-based guidelines should be funded and evaluated, especially for impact in meeting the needs of older GPs.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5904-5904
Author(s):  
Ankit Shah ◽  
Stuthi Perimbeti ◽  
Sumera Bukhari ◽  
Michael Wismer ◽  
Jordan Senchak ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Febrile neutropenia is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, healthcare resource utilization and associated cost. However, data regarding the relationship of specific cancers with admission for febrile neutropenia and their outcomes is lacking. Methods: Using the ICD-9 codes 288.00 and 288.04, we identified all adult admissions with primary diagnosis of febrile neutropenia during the interval of 2006-2013 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Hospitalization information regarding mortality rates, length of stay and total charges was extracted for each year. Total cost was adjusted for inflation using data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Differences in these variables in teaching and nonteaching institutions were evaluated. ICD-9 codes for esophageal, colon, rectal, liver, pancreatic, bladder, prostate, cervical, renal, thyroid, lung, and melanoma skin cancers were selected and the percentage of admissions attributed to each malignancy was determined. Results: We identified 48,253 admissions (weighted N = 233,116) with a primary diagnosis of febrile neutropenia from 2006-2013. Most of these admissions occurred at teaching institutions (n=28,902, weighted n=139,574). In-hospital mortality rates for febrile neutropenia had a downward trend over the time period of 2006-2013 although the difference was not statistically significant (p=.082). Specifically, the in-hospital mortality rate was 2.73% in 2006 and 1.35% in 2013. Mean length of stay (days) has decreased from 5.67 (±.16) in 2006 to 5.32 (±0.06) in 2013 (p=.0001) while total charges have increased from $29,113 (±1089) in 2006 to $41,713 (±726) in 2013 (p=.0001). This is greater than the expected inflationary change from $29,133 to $33,641 over the same time period. Mean length of stay (days) was found to be higher at teaching (5.89±.03) than at non-teaching (5.25±.04) hospitals (p=.0001). Similarly, mean total charges were higher in teaching ($41,577±364) than in non-teaching ($34,176±345) institutions (p=.0001). When comparing teaching vs. non-teaching institutions, in-hospital mortality was not found to have a statistically significant difference (p=.2688). Of the 13 malignancies queried, lung cancer (11.06%) and breast cancer (8.40%) accounted for more admissions for febrile neutropenia than the other malignancies selected. Breast cancer (3.62%, p=.0001) and lung cancer (16.11%, p=.0001) were also associated with much higher in-hospital mortality rates compared with the other malignancies selected. Conclusions: Breast and lung cancer account for a significant number of admissions for febrile neutropenia, which is consistent with their national prevalence. Of particular note,breast and lung cancer patients who were admitted for febrile neutropenia had a higher risk of mortality. In lung cancer, the frequently associated smoking-related comorbidities may be contributing to this finding. While in breast cancer, patients with advanced disease have an increase in cumulative lifetime dose of chemotherapy due to prolonged survival and this may result in a weakened bone marrow, a more susceptible patient, and consequently an increase in febrile neutropenia and mortality rates. Thus, given the greater mortality rate and significant number of patients affected, patients with these two malignancies should receive special attention to ensure they receive prophylaxis with granulocyte stimulating agents and/or antibiotics after treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bum-Joo Cho ◽  
Kyoung Min Kim ◽  
Sanchir-Erdene Bilegsaikhan ◽  
Yong Joon Suh

Abstract Febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the most concerning complications of chemotherapy, and its prediction remains difficult. This study aimed to reveal the risk factors for and build the prediction models of FN using machine learning algorithms. Medical records of hospitalized patients who underwent chemotherapy after surgery for breast cancer between May 2002 and September 2018 were selectively reviewed for development of models. Demographic, clinical, pathological, and therapeutic data were analyzed to identify risk factors for FN. Using machine learning algorithms, prediction models were developed and evaluated for performance. Of 933 selected inpatients with a mean age of 51.8 ± 10.7 years, FN developed in 409 (43.8%) patients. There was a significant difference in FN incidence according to age, staging, taxane-based regimen, and blood count 5 days after chemotherapy. The area under the curve (AUC) built based on these findings was 0.870 on the basis of logistic regression. The AUC improved by machine learning was 0.908. Machine learning improves the prediction of FN in patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer compared to the conventional statistical model. In these high-risk patients, primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor could be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document