Weekly docetaxel and cisplatin with capecitabine and bevacizumab (AVDCX) in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer: Results of a phase Ib/II study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15078-e15078
Author(s):  
Ofer Purim ◽  
Yulia Kundel ◽  
Udi Sadeh Gonik ◽  
Efraim Idelevich ◽  
Gal Medalia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Weekly Docetaxel ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Dose Levels

e15078 Background: Many efforts are being made to improve treatment options for advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC). The aim of this phase Ib/II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen, AVDCX, consisting of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin together with capecitabine and bevacizumab, in AEGC. Methods: Patients with AEGC received treatment with different dose levels of AVDCX (cisplatin and docetaxel 25-35 mg/m2, days 1,8, capecitabine 1,600 mg/m2days 1-14, bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, day 1, Q:21 days). To assure regimen's safety a short phase Ib part, with three dose levels, was planned. The study's primary objectives were to establish the recommended phase II doses of docetaxel and cisplatin in AVDCX and to determine the tumor response rate. Results: The study was closed early, after the accrual of 22 patients, due to accumulating toxicity-related deaths. The median age was 59 years and 77% of patients had gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. Grade ≥3 adverse events were documented in 18 patients (82%) and these were usually neutropenia (36%), fatigue (54%) or diarrhea (23%). There were three fatal toxicities (14%): mesenteric thromboembolism, gastric perforation and pancytopenic sepsis. Eventually, the recommended phase II doses of cisplatin and docetaxel were determined to be 25 mg/m2 and 30 mg/m2, respectively. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for response: 12 (54%) had partial response (PR), 4 (18%) had stable disease (SD) and none had complete response (CR). The objective response rate (CR+PR) was 54% and the disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 72%. Eighteen patients (82%) derived a clinical benefit: improvement of pain, weight or performance status without a deterioration of any of these factors, from treatment. The median overall survival was 11.3 months (range, 1.5-39.2+ months) and median progression-free survival was 8.7 months (range, 1.3–26.6 months). The 2-year OS rate reached 22.7%. Conclusions: AVDCX was associated with bevacizumab-related fatal toxicities. It seems to reproduce the efficacy of bevacizumab regimen AVAGAST trial, without a clue for significant improvement over common docetaxel regimens in AEGC.

Phase II study of irinotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18011-18011
Author(s):  
T. K. Owonikoko ◽  
S. Ramalingam ◽  
J. Forster ◽  
Y. Shuai ◽  
T. Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Version 2.0

18011 Background: Recurrent SCLC has a poor prognosis and is devoid of treatment options that improve overall survival. Irinotecan and paclitaxel are both active agents against SCLC, and have synergistic preclinical interactions. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent SCLC. Methods: Patients with SCLC who relapsed following one prior chemotherapy regimen were eligible. Other pertinent inclusion criteria were: ECOG performance status 0–2, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function and willingness to provide informed consent. Patients with untreated brain metastasis were excluded. Paclitaxel (75 mg/m2) and irinotecan (50 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 & 8 of every 3-week cycle. Treatment was continued until progression up to a maximum of 6 cycles or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate. Toxicity was graded by CTC version 2.0. The simon two-stage design was utilized and the estimated sample size was 55 patients (stage I - 23 patients; stage 2 - 32 patients). The study has a 90% power to detect a response rate of 30%, with an alpha error rate of 10%. Results: 55 patients have been enrolled and complete data are available for 32 patients at the time of this report. Patient baseline characteristics are: male 53%, PS 0–44%; PS 1–47% and PS 2–6%. The median age is 61 years. Fifteen patients received ≥ 4 cycles. Salient grades 3–5 toxicities seen: neutropenia (13%), fatigue (13%); diarrhea (3%), hypersensitivity (3%) and hyponatremia (3%).The objective response rate is 37% (95% CI 19%-55%) with 9 PRs and 1 CR. Additional 8 patients (24%) had stable disease. The median survival is 19.6 weeks (95% CI 15.1–29.4) and the 1-year survival rate is 15%. Conclusions: The combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel is well tolerated and has promising anti-cancer activity in recurrent SCLC. Updated data on all 55 patients will be available at the time of the presentation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized phase II trial of weekly docetaxel plus either cisplatin or oxaliplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer: Preliminary results

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4566-4566
Author(s):  
S. Sym ◽  
S. Park ◽  
J. Park ◽  
K. Kwon ◽  
I. Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Weekly Docetaxel ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Significant Difference

4566 Background: Docetaxel, in combination with cisplatin or oxaliplatin, has demonstrated efficacy against AGC. This randomized phase II trial evaluated two weekly docetaxel-based regimens to see which would be most promising according to objective response rate (ORR) as first-line therapy in AGC. Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and a performance status ≤2 were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (35 mg/m2) weekly on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle plus either cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1) (arm A) or oxaliplatin (120 mg/m2 on day 1) (arm B). Toxicity was assessed on days 1, 8, and 21 of each cycle, and response was evaluated every 2 cycles. Results: Between March 2007 and December 2008, 61 eligible patients entered. In Arm A, 29 patients were evaluable for objective response and 31 for safety. In Arm B, 28 patients were evaluable for objective response and 30 for safety. Median age was 52 years and disease status was comparable for both arms. Ten of 29 (34.5%) patients had a confirmed objective response in the arm A (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1–51.8%) and 11 of 28 (39.2%) patients had a confirmed objective response in the arm B (95% CI 21.1- 57.2%). No significant difference was noted between the arms both for ORR (p=0.202) or for disease control (58.6% and 82.1%, respectively, p=0.082). Median progression free survival time was 4.4 month in the arm A and 4.3 months in the arm B (Hazard ratio = 0.936; 95% CI, 0.503–1.744; p = 0.836). There was no relevant difference in the occurrence of overall grade ¾ toxicity between the two arms (51.6% vs. 46.6%, respectively; p=0.800). Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity (32.3% vs. 36.6%, respectively). There was one treatment related death in Arm B. Conclusions: The preliminary results showed that both treatment arms have similar clinical efficacy as front-line treatment in AGC. Each regimen has a manageable tolerability profile. The accrual is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Apatinib in patients with recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: a single-arm, phase II prospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110136
Author(s):  
Guopei Zhu ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Shengjin Dou ◽  
Rongrong Li ◽  
Jiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Adenoid Cystic ◽  
Fatal Hemorrhage

Background: Apatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) blocker, has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activities and tolerable toxicities in various cancer types. Recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck (R/MACCHN) carries a poor prognosis, and treatment options are currently limited. This study was conducted to explore the antitumor activity and safety of apatinib in patients with R/MACCHN. Methods: In this phase II single-arm, prospective study, patients aged 15–75 years with incurable R/MACCHN received apatinib at a 500 mg dose once daily until intolerance or progression occurred. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate based on RECIST version 1.1. The secondary endpoints included response rate, overall survival (OS), and safety. Efficacy was assessed in all dosed patients with at least one post-baseline tumor assessment. Results: Among 68 patients treated with apatinib, 65 were evaluable for efficacy analysis, with a median follow-up time of 25.8 months. The 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month PFS rates were 92.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 83–97.5%], 75.2% (95% CI: 61.5–84.0%) and 44.7% (95% CI: 32.3–57.5%), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), as assessed by investigators, were 46.2% (95% CI: 33.7–59.0%) and 98.5% (95% CI: 91.7–100.0%), respectively. The median duration of response was 17.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 14.0–20.9]. The 12-month and 24-month OS rates were 92.3% (95% CI: 83.0–97.5%) and 82.3% (95% CI: 70–90.4%), respectively. The most common adverse events of grades 3–4 were hypertension (5.9%), proteinuria (9.2%), and hemorrhage (5.9%). One patient developed a fatal hemorrhage. Conclusion: An encouraging PFS, a high ORR, and a manageable safety profile were observed in this study. It seems that the administration of apatinib in R/MACCHN is likely to have a clinically meaningful therapeutic benefit and warrants further investigation. This study was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02775370; date of registration: 17 May 2016; date of first patient enrollment: 25 May 2016)

A phase II study of amrubicin as palliative chemotherapy for previously treated malignant pleural mesothelioma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kageaki Watanabe ◽  
Yusuke Okuma ◽  
Shoko Kawai ◽  
Makoto Nagamata ◽  
Yukio Hosomi
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Number Of Treatment

Abstract Background Treatment options for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are limited. Anthracyclines are considered key drugs for treating MPM. However, their use is limited by severe cardiac toxicities. Amrubicin (AMR) is a next-generation anthracycline that is commonly used to treat lung cancer. We conducted a phase II trial of this drug in patients with previously treated MPM.Methods Eligible patients with MPM having adequate organ function and a performance status of 0–2 were enrolled after disease progression following pemetrexed/platinum therapy. Patients received 35 mg/m2 AMR on days 1–3 every 3 weeks until tumor progression or the appearance of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), number of treatment cycles, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated as secondary endpoints.Results This trial was discontinued because of low accrual. From September 2013 to July 2018, five patients with MPM were enrolled. Stable disease (SD) was observed in three patients (60%), and progressive disease was noted in two patients (40%). The median PFS was 2.4 (range, 1.2–11.2) months, and the median OS was 9.1 (range, 6.2–22.0) months. The median number of treatment cycles was three (range, 2–11). Grade 1/2 toxicities were observed in all patients. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in four patients (80%), but there were no cases of febrile neutropenia.Conclusion Despite the absence of the responders, the observation of SD in three patients suggests that AMR could have potential for treating MPM.Trial registration number and date of registrationUMIN000010739, May 16, 2013, retrospectively registered

A phase II trial of first-line FOLFIRINOX for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 89-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haeseong Park ◽  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Rama Suresh ◽  
Caron E. Rigden ◽  
Manik A. Amin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

89 Background: Standard first-line regimens for patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas have an approximate 40% objective response rate (ORR). FOLFIRINOX has been used in first line therapy in other GI cancers (i.e pancreatic and CRC) with impressive efficacy signals. Methods: This is a phase II study of first line combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric, esophageal, or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (NCT01928290). Starting doses were 5-FU 400mg/m2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours with leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2. Trastuzumab was administered as 6 mg/kg loading dose then 4 mg/kg every 14 days if patients had HER2+ cancer. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and duration of response. Enrollment of 41 patients with HER2- disease was planned to reach one-sided = 0.10 and power 0.90 with goal of detecting true ORR60%. No enrollment goal was planned for HER2+. Results: From Nov 2013 to July 2017, 58 patients were enrolled, 25 out of 58 (43%) had HER2+ disease. Forty-nine patients were evaluable for response as they completed at least one restaging scan. ORR was 78% (38/49) in all patients, 67% (18/27) in HER2-, 91% (20/22) in HER2+. One patient (2%) had complete response, 37 (76%) had partial response, 7 (14%) had stable disease > 6 months; therefore, CBR was 92%. Median PFS is 11.9 months, median OS is 17.4 months and median follow up time 16.1 months. 41 (83.7%) had dose modification or delay during treatment. There were no unexpected toxicities. Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX with or without trastuzumab showed remarkable ORR and PFS in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in the first-line setting. This regimen may be a reasonable therapeutic option for patients with preserved performance status. Further investigation in larger population is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01928290.

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1948-1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Zalcberg ◽  
M Millward ◽  
J Bishop ◽  
M McKeage ◽  
A Zimet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) and cisplatin are two of the most active single agents used in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A recently reported phase I study of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin recommended a dose of 75 mg/m2 of both drugs every 3 weeks for subsequent phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years with a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2 and life expectancy > or = 12 weeks, with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC proven histologically or cytologically. Patients were not permitted to have received prior chemotherapy, extensive radiotherapy, or any radiotherapy to the target lesion and must have had measurable disease. Concurrent treatment with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) or prophylactic antibiotics was not permitted. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) in 250 mL 5% dextrose was given intravenously (i.v.) over 1 hour immediately before cisplatin (75 mg/m2) in 500 mL normal saline given i.v. over 1 hour in 3-week cycles. Premedication included ondansetron, dexamethasone, promethazine, and standard hyperhydration with magnesium supplementation. RESULTS A total of 47 patients, two thirds of whom had metastatic disease, were entered onto this phase II study. The majority of patients were male (72%) and of good (WHO 0 to 1) performance status (85%). All 47 patients were assessable for toxicity and 36 were for response. Three patients were ineligible and eight (17%) discontinued treatment because of significant toxicity. In assessable patients, the overall objective response rate was 38.9% (95% confidence limits [CL], 23.1% to 56.5%), 36.1% had stable disease, and 25% progressive disease. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 29.8%. Median survival was 9.6 months and estimated 1-year survival was 33%. Significant (grade 3/4) toxicities included nausea (26%), hypotension (15%), diarrhea (13%), and dyspnea mainly related to chest infection (13%). One patient experienced National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade 3 neurosensory toxicity after eight cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was common and occurred in 87% of patients, but thrombocytopenia > or = grade 3 was rare (one patient). Significant (grade 3/4) abnormalities of magnesium levels were common (24%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 13% of patients and neutropenic infection in 11%, contributing to two treatment-related deaths. No neutropenic enterocolitis or severe fluid retention was reported. CONCLUSION Compared with other active regimens used in this setting, the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced NSCLC is an active regimen with a similar toxicity profile to other combination regimens.

Association of statins and nivolumab activity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Results from the phase II nivoren—GETUG AFU 26 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 359-359
Author(s):  
Emeline Colomba ◽  
Ronan Flippot ◽  
Cécile Dalban ◽  
Sylvie Negrier ◽  
Christine Chevreau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Modulation ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Metabolic Reprogramming ◽  
Oncogenic Signaling ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

359 Background: Statins are HMG-CoA inhibitors that regulate several mechanisms involved in tumor growth, including mitochondrial metabolism, activation of oncogenic signaling pathways, and immune modulation. Population-based studies showed that statin intake may be negatively associated with RCC onset. The impact of statins on response to immunotherapy in mRCC is unknown. Herein we study the association between statin administration and outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the NIVOREN-GETUG AFU 26 phase II trial (NCT03013335). Methods: Patients with mRCC who failed previous VEGFR inhibitors were included. We assessed nivolumab activity, including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) according to statin intake at baseline. Toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v4.0. Results: Overall,133 patients were treated with statins at baseline among 702 evaluable for concomitant therapies (19%). Among them, median age was 68 (49-90), 84% were male, 85% had a performance status ≥ 80%, 42% were overweight and 20% obese. Patients treated with statins had mostly good (23%) or intermediate (58%) IMDC risk, 64% had grade 3 or 4 tumors, and nivolumab was given in a third line setting or more in 55%. Median follow-up was 23.9 months (95%CI 23.0-24.5) in the overall cohort. The ORR was 26% in patients treated with statins, PFS 5.0 months (CI95% 3.0 – 5.5), OS 27.9 months (CI95% 19.4-30.3). Outcomes of patients with or without statins did not differ significantly. Similar rates of grade 3-5 TRAE were reported in patients with (20%) or without (18%) statin intake. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate statin intake and outcomes with nivolumab in patients with mRCC. Despite numerically higher ORR, statins were not significantly associated with improved outcomes. These data require other analyzes considering other factors such as BMI and other comorbidities. Further studies may help better understand the interplay between immunity and metabolic reprogramming in RCC.

scholarly journals Phase Ib/II Study of Pembrolizumab and Pegylated-Interferon Alfa-2b in Advanced Melanoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (35) ◽  
pp. 3450-3458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diwakar Davar ◽  
Hong Wang ◽  
Joe-Marc Chauvin ◽  
Ornella Pagliano ◽  
Julien J. Fourcade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pegylated Interferon ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Phase Ib

Purpose Objective responses are reported in 34% to 37% of patients with programmed death-1 (PD-1)–naïve advanced melanoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Pre-existing CD8+ T-cell infiltrate and interferon (IFN) gene signature correlate with response to PD-1 blockade. Here, we report a phase Ib/II study of pembrolizumab/pegylated (PEG)-IFN combination in PD-1–naïve advanced melanoma. Patients and Methods PEG-IFN (1, 2, and 3 μg/kg per week) was dose escalated using a modified toxicity probability interval design in three cohorts of four patients each, whereas pembrolizumab was dosed at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks in the phase Ib portion. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the phase II portion. Primary objectives were safety and incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary objectives included objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Results Forty-three patients with stage IV melanoma were enrolled in the phase Ib and II portions of the study and included in the analysis. At the data cutoff date (December 31, 2017), median follow-up duration was 25 months (range, 1 to 38 months). All 43 patients experienced at least one adverse event; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21 of 43 patients (48.8%). Objective responses were seen at all three dose levels among 43 evaluable patients. The objective response rate was 60.5%, with 46.5% of patients exhibiting ongoing response. Median PFS was 11.0 months in all patients and unreached in responders, whereas median overall survival remained unreached in all patients. The 2-year PFS rate was 46%. Conclusion Pembrolizumab/PEG-IFN demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile with promising evidence of clinical efficacy in PD-1–naïve metastatic melanoma. These results support the rationale to further investigate this pembrolizumab/PEG-IFN combination in this disease.

Sorafenib With Interferon Alfa-2b As First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Carcinoma: A Phase II Study of the Southwest Oncology Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (22) ◽  
pp. 3296-3301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Ryan ◽  
Bryan H. Goldman ◽  
Primo N. Lara ◽  
Philip C. Mack ◽  
Tomasz M. Beer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Renal Carcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Interferon Alfa

Purpose This phase II study evaluated the activity of combined treatment with interferon alfa-2b and sorafenib, a Raf and multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced renal carcinoma. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had metastatic or unresectable renal carcinoma with a clear-cell component, no prior systemic therapy, performance status 0 to 1, and measurable disease. Treatment consisted of interferon alfa-2b 10 × 106 U subcutaneously three times weekly and sorafenib 400 mg orally bid. The primary end point was confirmed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response rate. Results Twelve (19%) of 62 assessable patients achieved an objective confirmed response. An additional 31 (50%) had an unconfirmed partial response or stable disease as best response. The median progression-free survival was 7 months (95% CI, 4 to 11 months). The most common adverse events were fatigue, anorexia, anemia, diarrhea, nausea, rigors/chills, leukopenia, fever, and transaminase elevation. Von Hippel-Lindau gene mutations were detected in four (22%) of 18 archival tumor specimens. Conclusion The confirmed response rate for the combination of sorafenib and interferon in advanced renal carcinoma is greater than expected with either interferon or sorafenib alone. The toxicity of this combination is dominated by adverse events common to interferon that limit further development of this regimen.

scholarly journals Phase II California Cancer Consortium Trial of Gemcitabine-Eribulin Combination in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Final Report (NCI-9653)

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (29) ◽  
pp. 2682-2688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarmad Sadeghi ◽  
Susan G. Groshen ◽  
Denice D. Tsao-Wei ◽  
Rahul Parikh ◽  
Amir Mortazavi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

PURPOSE Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma are often ineligible for cisplatin-based treatments. A National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program–sponsored trial assessed the tolerability and efficacy of a gemcitabine-eribulin combination in this population. METHODS Patients with treatment-naïve advanced or recurrent metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, ureter, or urethra not amenable to curative surgery and not candidates for cisplatin-based therapy were eligible. Cisplatin ineligibility was defined as creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min (but ≥ 30 mL/min), grade 2 neuropathy, or grade 2 hearing loss. Treatment was gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously followed by eribulin 1.4 mg/m2, both on days 1 and 8, repeated in 21-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. A Simon two-stage phase II trial design was used to distinguish between Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 objective response rates of 20% versus 50%. RESULTS Between June 2015 and March 2017, 24 eligible patients with a median age of 73 years (range, 62 to 88 years) underwent therapy. Performance status of 0, 1, or 2 was seen in 11, 11, and two patients, respectively. Sites of disease included: lymph nodes, 16; lungs, nine; liver, seven; bladder, five; bones, two. Median number of cycles received was four (range, one to 16). Of 24 patients, 12 were confirmed responders; the observed objective response rate was 50% (95% CI, 29% to 71%). Median overall survival was 11.9 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 20.4 months), and median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.5 to 6.7 months). The most common treatment-related any-grade toxicities were fatigue (83% of patients), neutropenia (79%), anemia (63%), alopecia (50%), elevated AST (50%), and constipation, nausea, and thrombocytopenia (42% each). CONCLUSION Gemcitabine-eribulin treatment response and survival for cisplatin-ineligible patients compare favorably to other regimens. Additional research is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document